The Su-34 bomber regiment in the Far East was armed with X-35U anti-ship missiles

Front-line bombers of the Su-34 aviation regiment stationed in the Far East received anti-ship missiles X-35У. This is reported "News" with reference to the Russian military department.

Russian front-line bombers Su-34 from the 277-th bomber regiment stationed at the Khurba aerodrome near Komsomolsk-on-Amur received advanced anti-ship missiles (ASM) X-35U with an increased flight range of up to 260 km. Aircraft with anti-ship missiles capable of destroying not only enemy ships, but also ground targets, went on combat alert this fall.

According to military experts, putting on combat duty the regiment Su-34 with the Kh-35U will significantly increase the combat capabilities of the Russian Navy and VKS in the entire Asia-Pacific region. With the advent of a long-range anti-ship missile in the Su-34 arsenal, it will allow aircraft to effectively hit enemy naval targets, supporting Pacific ships fleet.

It should not be forgotten that the Su-34 themselves have a flight range of up to 4,5 thousand km, and with refueling it increases to 7 thousand, which allows bombers to meet the enemy at distant approaches, leaving the coastal zone defense to the Ball and Bastion missile systems .

Note that the RCC X-35U passed tests in Syria, following which it underwent modernization, which increased its range. It is possible that other characteristics have been changed, but so far there is no information about this.

Comments

[Saboteur Holuy]

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

In the seas and oceans alone is the AUG swimming? No other goals? Besides

capable of destroying not only enemy ships, but also ground targets

[Saboteur Holuy]

Almost none, there is a 7th fleet

[hrych]

Quote: Saboteur Holuay

Almost none, there is a 7th fleet

The range of the rocket and the flight characteristics of the carrier, not inferior to Hornet in speed and significantly exceeding it in combat radius, makes the attack inevitable. But for the low-altitude breakthrough, missile launchers of ships can not be forgotten and the range of detection of Hokai. The combat radius of Hornet is only 700 km and the range is two less, even without refueling and additional tanks of ours. The author of the article was mistaken, the range of 7000 km was not with refueling, but with an outboard fuel tank. With refueling, he will make a trip around the world Although certainly for such a goal as the AUG they will send not the Su-34, but the Tu22M3 or Mig-31K, which does not need to go into the air defense zone at all and the anti-ship missiles, of course, with nuclear warheads. Neither the air wing nor the latest SM-6 missiles can catch them, for the launch range of the Dagger and X-22/32 is greater than the Hornet combat radius, and the missile range. And they are stupidly faster.

[Saboteur Holuy]

I have doubts that the hypersound is accurate and will hit the target ... but that’s not the point. The distances there will not allow you to use your described tactics there Japan is close at hand ... and keep in mind that the range of the Kyrgyz Republic is greater than that of our anti-ship missiles ... they will strike directly at the airfields ... and there are doubts about the identity of our KR ...

[hrych]

Quote: Saboteur Holuay

the range of the Kyrgyz Republic is greater than that of our RCC

No, no more. The radius of the Dagger and X-32 plus the radius of their carriers. But Tu22 will generally meet a long-range bomb carrier and adversary far beyond the limits of an enemy attack. Here there is a chance to attack the KR, reaching the line of attack at the nuclear submarines, but here we will not watch indifferently. And there is a PLO. Considering the Syrian experience in repulsing a massive strike of the Kyrgyz Republic (for a hundred pieces) and the use of air defense missile defense systems for air defense developed in the Caspian, subsonic Tomogawks are not a panacea. Their whole chip is a low-altitude breakthrough due to the curvature of the earth, but the ZGRLS see them perfectly. It was at the Pacific Fleet that the Wave, Taurus and Sunflower worked out.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

I have doubts that the hypersound is accurate and will hit the target ... but that’s not the point. The distances there will not allow you to use your described tactics there Japan is close at hand ... and keep in mind that the range of the Kyrgyz Republic is greater than that of our anti-ship missiles ... they will strike directly at the airfields ... and there are doubts about the identity of our KR ...

Katz (Kholuy), offers to surrender, and constantly.

there is Japan at hand

Here. You contradict yourself, claiming that there is nobody except the 7th fleet.

they will strike straight at the airfields

Well, yes, and ours will stupidly sit on the ass and watch how airfields are destroyed?
These are the defeated Holoai and went to the enemies in the service. And now they are yelling in Bolotnaya Ploshchad that the adversaries will crush us anyway, and it’s better to lie under them with white flags (ribbons) in advance.

[Vlad.by]

he is not a defeatist, honestly he wrote - a saboteur.
He’s probably sitting somewhere in Tver, Oregon, or St. Petersburg, Wyoming, and is banging on the clave. In addition to the Russian language and Russian secondary education, there is nothing in the asset. We have to sell the soul to the devil.
Intellectual saboteur.
It’s necessary to ban such.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Vlad.by

It is necessary to ban such

Banning such years is not in our power with you. They are polite to hell (spelled out in the instructions for trolls), formally, they do not violate the site rules. The moderators have nothing to hook them with. Therefore, they here feel politely at ease, despite the fact that they have overgrown with "minuses", like hedgehogs with needles. They do not even answer the questions asked to them, because they themselves are dull, and they do not find these answers in the manuals.

They just got shovels and fans.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Vlad.by

he is not a defeatist, honestly he wrote - a saboteur.

From people like him, saboteurs, like a bullet from the crap. "Sabotage" is carried out only in the area of ​​the sofa-toilet.

[Escobar]

Which of NATO’s warships in general can be guaranteed to destroy the x-35? Judging by Vicki, they serve to destroy ships up to 5000 thousand tons of water supply. Any frigates / corvettes or transports.

[hrych]

Quote: Eskobar

Which of NATO's warships in general can be guaranteed to destroy the x-35

The Baltic, the Black Sea-Mediterranean and the Sea of ​​Japan are full of small ships. Rather, even say that there are practically no large vessels. They are too vulnerable there. A large ship and must be hijacked further for its own safety. X-35 Harpoon analogue - which is the essence of the core of NATO. When humiliating the X-35 you are talking more about the inferiority of NATO anti-ship missiles in comparison with ours, where the X-35 is the most lousy. Well, to each his own. You will not stick Granite into the boat. By the way, 5000 is a frigate. Frigates are the main ships of NATO without the United States, of course, where the main ship of 9000 tons is the destroyer. And if the X-35 enters Burke, then it will not sink it, but will cause unacceptable losses, with the exit from the battle definitely. And it is important where Uranus got. There are places that horror ...

[Vlad.by]

One of the American aircraft carriers at Midway, it seems Yorktown, sank a random 200 kg bomb. It just successfully broke through the flight deck and exploded near the fuel line, for three days, the poor fellow burned, the whales themselves drowned ...
So the deck of the aircraft carrier of that time was stronger than the side of the modern cruiser or destroyer 9-10 thousand tons, or even an aircraft carrier. The main thing is to put this rocket on board, preferably closer to the waterline.
And there it’s how the card will fall. The fact that the ship will be sky-ready for a long time is not necessary to go to the grandmother. And with a good confluence, Sheffield’s fate at the Falklands will be repeated. Also, there was just one Exocet aboard ...

[sivuch]

That is, in the event of a conflict, the flow of goods to Japan will immediately be interrupted? So, the Su-34 (along with others, of course) completed their task

[rocket757]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

Yes, yes, but you haven’t heard about such a thing, that there will certainly be a fighter cover ..... God knows how far from their airfields.

[Saboteur Holuy]

Any further than from AUG

[rocket757]

We proceed from the fact that the AUG does not have a foot to our shores, except perhaps as officially invited ... and that is doubtful!
How much should the AUG approach the database zone. so that deck aircraft can operate efficiently?
The question is: what is the difference between carrier-based aviation versus airfield-based aviation?

[Saboteur Holuy]

The fact is that there are not so many fighters there, there is nothing to trump, and the AUG can really come up, and not only deck aviation will cover it, but also ground aviation from Japanese bases ... they will crush us with quality and quantity! They can’t even take off from the bases ...

[rocket757]

Do you think someone will wait for the concentration of enemy forces, and if that, will not do anything?
The enemy will be able to fly to our bases, how to go on the lawn?
Everything is not simple there and no easy walk is expected ....
Everyone understands this and will not risk it.
It is not provided for by our doctrine of defense to sit on the loin and wait for what and how it will go.
In fact, you will not try and learn nothing, and all sorts of assumptions seem to be true until the first fatal shot!
An empty argument and will be convinced that, thank God, no one is foreseen ... bad dumb!

[Saboteur Holuy]

This is all a theory ... but the practice is that there is enough for the Japanese Air Force and Navy to take away the islands and inflict damage on us ... to say nothing of the US 7th fleet and its bases in South Korea and especially in Japan? We are still there and nothing ... with one machine gun artillery division ...

[rocket757]

Defeat a nuclear power NOT POSSIBLE!

[Saboteur Holuy]

I did not write about nuclear weapons ... this is another topic

[rocket757]

Can you imagine how to separate a vigorous power from its most effective potential, if it is in real danger of an attack by a weak enemy or a coalition of enemies .... it does not work.

[Vlad.by]

To comb a goat - only to spoil.
Do not waste time.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Saboteur Holuay

the practice is there the Japanese Air Force and Navy alone will have enough to take away the islands and inflict defeat on us

And where did you practice, "strategist"?

[Escobar]

Yes, yes, "we will beat the enemy on his territory, with little blood." Have already passed.

[rocket757]

The question is not about small blood at all ... A concrete armahide shines for someone, or even for everything else in one fell swoop.
No one will check.

[basmach]

And half of the combat load will be replaced by PTB.

[Ros 56]

Calm down uncle, in case of a serious skirmish, your AUGs will be covered with a copper basin first of all before going to the ocean.

[Escobar]

The nuclear bomb?;)

[svp67]

Quote: Saboteur Holuay

Aha, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ...

By that time, many of them will be looking at it from the bottom of the sea depths, struck by our long-range anti-aircraft missiles, looking at and letting bubbles ..

[rocket757]

Fighters, this is no longer an absolute weapon, everything is decisive ... at least in a dispute between powers that have serious nuclear-missile potential.

[svp67]

Quote: rocket757

Fighters, this is no longer an absolute weapon, everything is decisive ...

And did they really when they were? For this role, atomic weapons will also work, but not fighters.

[rocket757]

Well, well, all AUGs are afraid! These are colonial forces / troops, against one who cannot date a proper answer ...
In general, the topic is hackneyed, it will not show anything new.

[svp67]

Quote: rocket757

Well, well, all AUGs are afraid!

So AUG is not terrible for its fighters, but for strike aircraft, nuclear weapons carriers

[rocket757]

Quote: svp67

So AUG is not terrible for its fighters, but for strike aircraft, nuclear weapons carriers

So there are objects that have specially equipped missiles, their firing range is more than our coastal aviation can get!
Anyway, I don’t want to talk about such a final war ... not predictably.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

So you yourself always assure us that due to the fact that the Earth is round there is a horizon of visibility, or does this topic not apply to carrier-based aviation? Does it already see everything? The attacker has the advantage, since it is active, while the attack must still be detected in time and prepare for its reflection.
I agree with you that in today's realities aircraft carriers are an easy target.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

If the target is within the radius of the Su-34 with the X-35U suspended, then the cover fighters / clearing groups will also reach it.
Moreover, to meet the Su-34 AUG air defense fighters will not be over the target, but 100 miles before the launch of the anti-ship missile.

[Alexander Petrov1]

The most powerful and farthest air defense on ships has only 1 country in the world: Russia, sea S-300 and S400 with a range of more than 300 km, and others will not reach our SU-34, 35, 30 carriers of Kh-35U missiles.

[Escobar]

Excuse me, with 400 on ships?

[Alexander Petrov1]

On the cruiser Moscow ...

[Tommy]

Eskobar (Pavel)! "Polyment-Redoubt" with a new missile (in development?) With a range of 400 km will be correct ...

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

The most powerful and farthest air defense on ships has only 1 country in the world is Russia

Actually, the United States - because the depth of AUG air defense reaches 300-400 miles (it was calculated back in the days of the Soviet MPA to intercept carriers of heavy anti-ship missiles of the WB).

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

Sea S-300 and S400 with a range of more than 300 km

The devil - he is in the details. ©
300 km is a heavy missile for a target at high altitudes. At low altitudes, due to the radio horizon, the range is reduced to 30-40 km.
And the standard flight profile of the strike air group of a potential enemy back in the 80s provided for an approach to the target and launching anti-ship missiles at low and criminally low altitudes, beyond the radio horizon. At the same time, the drummers could not see their target - the group was guided by data from the inseparable Hawkeye - Growler pair.

[Alexander Petrov1]

The United States does not have long-range air defense ships on board ships, but Aegis missile defense, and this is a big difference ...

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

The United States does not have long-range air defense ships on board ships, but Aegis missile defense, and this is a big difference ...

US ships air defense stands on the decks of AB.
It’s only with us that the air defense of ships is understood exclusively as air defense systems.

[kit88]

Why didn’t the SM-2 please you? Just in case, they are already sawing the SM-6.

[Vlad.by]

And what, excuse me, is the numerical strength of the air defense of that indestructible, formidable, super-duper-hypo-nano aircraft carrier order, who wants to approach our sacred shore and "drive the Papuans"? What are they going to threaten us with?

In the air, a maximum of 2 pairs of F-18 with one or, at best, two Hokai.
And they hang out, of course, from the threatened direction, that is, from the shore.
Moreover, they are not armed to the maximum, they are loaded with fuel because they need to patrol them for as long as possible ...

And against them (we decided to drown the AUG, who criminally approached our shore!), A reconnaissance and distraction group (a couple, or even two) is formed, plus an air cleansing strike group (at least 3-4 pairs, but rather a squadron) , plus a cover group (another link, or even a pair of links). These are only fighters ...
Drummers - (Su34, Tu22M3, MiG31 with a Dagger, or even strategists) follow, coordinated in time and direction, and most likely also with cover (at least a couple for a couple).
Total, under two regiments of fighters with tankers and a regiment, or even two drummers, to the eyeballs of loaded anti-ship missiles.

And what can AUG set up to strengthen an air defense order? Not fools, they will begin to intensify after the discovery of an intelligence group.
- The time for the gain group to take off is ten minutes, and the gain group — two, maximum 3 pairs of Super Hornets, will not be in time anymore.
And this is the strongest air defense ???
Duty Hornets with the remaining fuel tending to zero, thinking how to escape as soon as possible, but 4-6 taking off (when they still fly ...) Total 6-8, maximum 10 "lame" Hornets against the regiment Su30, Su35 (24 or more cars) ...
And what does it shine for?
Ground attackers come with hanging tanks and after refueling from tankers. They are free to choose an attack profile. And the Hornets - they only need to keep the perimeter, but look at the pointer to the remaining fuel and cry for reinforcements ...
Shipborne air defense systems Berkov and Tikonderoger maximum will be able to shoot at the RCC when they appear due to the radio horizon, and some of the channels will be occupied by high-altitude X-32, by the way.
And whether Hokai will be able to give a preliminary TSU is a big question!
Will Dryers give them such an opportunity?
According to the anti-ship missiles, the ship’s air defense systems will definitely not work - it’s unrealistic.
The Hornets are not the tenants, since they are no longer destined to sit on the deck, or they will leave the warrant without cover and anyway bend over.
The morale of the pilots - naturally on the rise, they are not fools!

And this whole picture - if ours attack the AUG head-on, with a "crowbar" from the shore.
And according to the mind, at least one strike group will bypass the order and come from the ocean. And all this simultaneously with a blow from the shore. The "Ocean Group" on the MV will reach the anti-ship missile drop point by 80-90% unnoticed and not attacked, the Hokai will be occupied by the threatened direction, and that "strongest air defense" AUG will not have enough resources for a serious defensive battle - the notorious catapults in theory allow raise the wing in 30 minutes, but this is during an exercise, when all the aircraft are pre-fueled, loaded with ammunition, the pilots are in the cockpits ...
Yes, and how much of that magnificent air wing? maximum one third of the total composition i.e. from the strength of 20 cars out of 90 (if on the AV a full wing)
In reality, all 20, even 30 fighters will be raised well if in an hour and a half, when everything is over - anti-ship missiles have been shot, some of the air defense systems are feeding the fish, some are just getting ready.
No, you can, of course, keep that "air defense" in the air - but ... any navel will be untied after a few hours.

Well, and, of course, submariners, or even several corvettes / frigates, will shoot at the AUG along with aviation - this does not go to the grandmother! Beat it for sure.
Destruction of the AUG, which approached the distance of the shot - strategic task!

And which of this ugliness is the conclusion?
And no AUG will get closer than 3000-4000 km to our coast.
Under no circumstances!
The idiots are dumb there.

Well, he’ll climb - just a kayuk, there are no options.

[mvg]

Rare nonsense. We currently do not have ships with real air defense. Only Gorshkov. And on the Pacific Fleet one Varangian. With air defense 30 years ago. Missiles with a range of 90 km.

[Alexander Petrov1]

How is it not air defense, but the S-300 Fort with a range of up to 250 km?

[mvg]

This Fort is 30 years old. It is not known that the long-range missiles were integrated there. He has restrictions on the EPR of the target and height. Not all axes he will take. But Japanese RCC is too tough for him. Like the Chinese Caliber. And the number of Fort channels (3). This is far nn Burke with SM-2 and SM-6 with Aegis.

[Alexander Petrov1]

But how about the land S-300 and S-400, they also will not take either the Chinese or the Japanese, so they are recognized as leaders in the world and the Chinese and others would not buy them for a billion dollars, I wrote to you that Aegis from the USA is a missile defense against ballistic high-altitude missiles, and not airplanes and low-flying missiles like Caliber or Uranus or Onyx, and even more so Zircon, and their air defense on ships with a maximum range of 150 km and they are not rivals to our Dry and our low-flying missiles ...

[Vlad.by]

And Burke, excuse me, how many channels from the direction? 4? still a big difference!
And how are you going to use SM6 for low-rise anti-ship missiles? And indeed, Aegis has problems with MV goals, at least not less than the 30-year-old Fort. The Fort even has antennas twice as high, respectively, and a radio horizon a dozen and a half kilometers further. And not Fort alone, our naval air defense lives.
And it's not about our air defense, but about the air defense of an aircraft carrier warrant, which we will attack.

[mvg]

Well, then read how the SM-6 knocks down supersonic low-altitude missiles by 200+ km. And his maximum range is 460 km. Aegis has long been corrected for low-altitude goals.
AIR / PRO AUG is very strong. At least 3-4 beracks and a pair of Tikanderog .. plus aviation hornets and hokai. Their near missile defense and torture 100% result.
And in height, do you think that the 300 S-1983P (Fort) radar flies above the Hokai 2014 g / v? And also sees 400 km?

[Vlad.by]

Bring a checker to you, or do you cut everyone down? )
Our sworn friends, even stationary missile defense during exercises, knock down 30% of targets with pre-known trajectory parameters. But then you definitely know that Aegis at 200+ and even at low altitude hits the squirrel in the eye 100%. Cool!
Also tell us how exactly the Ajis was fixed for MV goals, did the frequencies change? Or did they begin to reflect the sea in a different radio wave?
You are not interesting to me as an opponent.
Learn physics first.

[mvg]

Since the modification AN / SPY-1D, this is 1992. And how you got it, find it yourself, I went to teach physics. Rather, remember.
I understand that they teach you to be rude at school?

[mvg]

http://www.oborona.ru/includes/periodics/navy/2017/0324/214221015/print.shtml
Can you use text search?

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

How is it not air defense, but the S-300 Fort with a range of up to 250 km?

Fort has a range of 90 km, and Fort M up to 150 km. Where did you get the figure of 250 km?

Unlike its predecessor, the Fort anti-aircraft complex, the Fort-M air defense system is capable of firing up to 6 targets simultaneously at a distance of up to 150 km and successfully fighting anti-ship missiles at altitudes up to 10 meters. The expansion of the affected area was achieved by improving the energy characteristics of the transmitter and the sensitivity of the receiving channels.

On the cruiser "Peter the Great" (pr. 1144.2), the S-300FM "Fort-M" bow complex is installed. Thus, the "Peter the Great" cruiser is armed with one S-300F complex with 48 48N6 missiles and one S-300FM complex with 46 48N6E2 missiles.

http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/fort_m/fort_m.shtml

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: mvg

Rare nonsense. We currently do not have ships with real air defense. Only Gorshkov. And on the Pacific Fleet one Varangian. With air defense 30 years ago. Missiles with a range of 90 km.

Well, not only Gorshkov, but also his classmates, and on some ships they delivered the S-300FM with a range of 150 km.

In Russia, the state tests of the Poliment-Redoubt anti-aircraft missile system for frigates of project 22350 were completed.
Poliment-Redut combines the new Poliment radar system with the Redut complex, which implements a vertical launch of anti-aircraft missiles. Its capabilities allow you to hit any existing and promising means of air attack.
The new complex is capable of hitting aerial targets within a radius of 150 kilometers and at an altitude of up to 30 kilometers.

https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/117084/

[Alexander Petrov1]

Recent modifications of the S-300 Fort M range up to 250 km, altitude from 10 m, and Redoubt height from 5 m range to 150 km and developed up to 400 km, the United States has such an air defense range, and even more so such a low altitude (you can even sink a ship or low-flying missile) and never dreamed of, they only developed the Aegis missile defense system up to 200 km in height, but we also have a new S-500 air defense and missile defense system with a range of 500 km, and the defeat height, like in the United States, will be 200 km also its ship version.

[Vlad.by]

Do not compare green with wet!
None of the air defense systems will work on targets beyond the radio horizon. All the ravings about over-the-horizon shelling so far have a place to be on exercises in ideal conditions and then 2 times a third.
Even with Hokai above the warrant.

They like to admire the advertising characteristics of enemy weapons and belittle the real possibilities of their own.

[Fitter65]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

Ogh, AUG exterminators will just watch without opposition ... but essentially an easy target ...

According to the rules of the Russian language, it is necessary to write "AGA" correctly, otherwise you should be firing with your Cambridge spelling, just like that daughter of a Russian officer from Sevastopol in 2014. And what the AUG "fighters" can do in 2000 was shown by the Su-24 MR from the 11th Air Force and Air Defense Army, who simply mocked the "Kitty Hawk"

And this is in 2000, the keros code for liters for each flight was filtered. Yes, and a comment to the author, it is necessary to write correctly 277 MAP BAP. All the same, the regiment from the foothills of the Caucasus and to Germany reached, and the name in those days was not just given.

eagles on keels in 2010 I drew. And the emblem of Seryoga Chernyavsky in 1999

[voyaka uh]

The rocket is good.
Modern.

[parkello]

and most importantly, there is a reason to drink

[Romario_Argo]

especially when on a link of 2 Su-34s: 2nd Kh-35U anti-ship missiles + 4th Kh-57MK2 + 4th Kh-31P + V-V missiles for self-defense
X-35U and X-31 immobilize and blind the ship - and X-57МК2 hit both on the surface - achieving the goal
* exercises were held in Primorye with 3-ya Su-34, there the potential is even higher

[bober1982]

Quote: Romario_Argo

especially when on a link from 2 Su-34

В FBA (Su-24, Su-34), the link is four aircraft.

[Fitter65]

Quote: bober1982

Quote: Romario_Argo

especially when on a link from 2 Su-34

В FBA (Su-24, Su-34), the link is four aircraft.

So a link in 4 aircraft in both air defense and fighter jets.

[demo]

According to military experts, the deployment of combat duty to the Su-34 regiment with the X-35U will significantly increase the combat capabilities of the Russian Navy and VKS throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
Paphos should be less.
And then they swung at our, so to speak, "William Shakespeare".

[svp67]

Quote: demo

Paphos should be less.

It is yes, but when "no shisha, and suddenly an arshin ..." So that the assessment is correct.

[Titus]

I agree with you, otherwise we will usually lay, modernize and other promises ... in fact, once and on duty.

[Fitter65]

Quote: demo

will increase the combat capabilities of the Russian Navy and VKS throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
Paphos should be less.
And then they swung at our, so to speak, "William Shakespeare".

William Shakespeare is not very popular in this region, Britain is on the other side of the globe from the Khurba airfield. But about the Asia-Pacific region, everything is true. 277 Mlavsky BAP is the only regiment in the Far East that has the Su-34 in service, and which is a BAP. The Far East is the eastern part of Asia, Khurba is a settlement that is administratively part of the Khabarovsk Territory. The coast of the Khabarovsk Territory is washed by two seas of Japan and Okhotsk which are part of the Pacific Ocean. So everything is right, the Asia-Pacific region. So let William Shakespeare teach geography

[demo]

277 Mlavsky BAP only regiment
You yourself answered all my messages.
So the great English poet and playwright, although he did not teach geography, did not recommend swinging sneakers at an elephant.
Therefore, I urge modesty.

[Vlad.by]

So "military danger" has not yet been announced !?
Why more then?
It will be needed - they will drive more, do not hesitate

[svp67]

This is good news.

[Zaurbek]

Need CR for tactical fighters with a range of 1000km. There, Japan itself is an unsinkable aircraft carrier. And you need to be able to inflict unacceptable damage before colliding with them and the US Navy.

[Sky strike fighter]

X-50 is right for you?

[Zaurbek]

If only Su30 / 34 ... and MiG35 came up. They planned something else there. X50 for Tu22, it seems.

[Sky strike fighter]

The X-50 will be able to carry tactical aircraft as well. Analogue of KR JAASM-ER.

[Zaurbek]

They did less there .. a square section for the Su57

[Sky strike fighter]

That range does not reach 1000 km, so the X-50.

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: Mikhail Kaverin

METALLOM.

scrap metal is what’s on Svidomo’s head

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Mikhail Kaverin

METALLOM.

Before the defeat of the X-35U missile, the ship, and after the defeat by METAL.

[mso.716]

Strategists in comments

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote from rudolf

Perhaps it makes sense to transfer all available S-34s to naval aviation.

all probably not worth it, but a regiment for each fleet is the right thing

[Alexey RA]

Quote from rudolf

Perhaps it makes sense to transfer all available S-34s to naval aviation.

Will the fleet pull the rebirth of MPA?

[steelmaker]

And I'm just happy. The main thing is rearmament, not collapsed!

[alexmach]

But what about more serious missiles. What about the aircraft-based Onyx-Yakhont? Vaughn India has long since adopted the aviation Brahmos ...

[sivuch]

But this was removed from the language. For a platypus, a more dimensional product is required, but also long-range.

[alexmach]

And not only for the Su-34 but in general for naval aviation.

[Operator]

"Kh-35U with a range increased to 260 km"- it will not be enough: given the combat radius of the Superhornets and the F-35C, at least a Dagger with 1000 km is needed as an anti-ship missile.

And even better is the mobile RS-26 with RGCHIN and a flight range of 5500 km - within the radius of detection of surface targets by ZGRLS "Container"

[Sky strike fighter]

A multifunctional latest X-59MK2 with a range of up to 500 km will be enough. Do not exaggerate the capabilities of carrier-based aircraft. Moreover, the radius of patrols and the maximum combat radius (there and back) are not the same.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Operator

[I]

And even better is the mobile RS-26 with RGCHIN and a flight range of 5500 km - within the radius of detection of surface targets by ZGRLS "Container"

And I and Stary26 already explained so much, by the way, in my opinion, it’s just for you, Andrei, that shooting ICBMs as RCC is impossible and why it’s impossible, but to you like water off a duck .. And also with real-time target designation from ZGRLS .. well, fantasies you..

moreover, the RS-26 is officially excluded from the weapons program

[Operator]

Well, if Vasyan N himself explained with the Old 26, then tady kaneshno without options

[2 Level Advisor]

Andrei, I’m not getting into authority - I haven’t earned it yet in VO, but about the Old26 you should not ...
Then tell us your vision - what is the order of the ICBM strike as RCC ..
Here ZGRLS caught AUG .. Next? how will the signal from the ZGRLS reach the ICBM installation and be recorded in the flight mission?
I'm just really interested, what do you think?
What, like in a Merikosov’s movie, a seated officer at the remote control will pick up the launch mouse, poke at the aircraft carrier in the picture that’s in the monitor .. and after a minute the ICBM is on the way .. and five minutes later from the AUG warrant there are only striped flags on surfaces with bubbles ..
Did I understand your idea of ​​this procedure correctly?

[Operator]

For ZGRLS, there is no problem to transmit the coordinates and motion vector of the AUG (with an accuracy of 1 km / 1 angular degree) via optical fiber to the command post of the RS-26 division and then via radio link to the mobile launcher. Then the coordinates are written into the memory of the onboard missile guidance system. The coordinates of the most mobile launcher are determined by the "milestones" placed along the route of movement. Therefore, the trajectory of the missile is calculated by the ballistic computer in less than a minute. KVO firing at a level of 100 meters is provided by astronavigation of the BB breeding stage.

The diameter of the shock wave from a thermonuclear charge of a megaton class superstructure of surface ships can be estimated at 15 km, therefore, four charges will cover an area of ​​at least 30x30 km (even more if we take into account the cumulative effect in the middle between the epicenters of the time-synchronized explosions).

[Vlad.by]

4 megatons, for one AUG ???
And what for ???
If it is 5000 km from our coast, why bother with it? And if it threatens our shores, then it is at a range of 500-600 km. And then she got a kayak without options without any fusion.
The massive raid of the Su-34 regiment + Tu-22 regiment while covering fighters and that’s all, there is no AUG.
Yes and no idiots there, no one will drive the AUG to death.
Only if the nuclear war has already ended and the AUG is still safe and sound, refueled and full of a healthy crew - then maybe ...
But this is from the category of erotic fiction.

[SETSET]

Quote: Level 2 Advisor

Andrei, I’m not getting into authority - I haven’t earned it yet in VO, but about the Old26 you should not ...

an advisor of the 2nd level, are you with Stary26 specialists here? Forgot your nickname! You here I remember trying to slander me with yours for a couple and carried nonsense about the radio horizon line, not knowing elementary things in physics! You and the listed comrades have problems with some knowledge. Learn materiel and do not write nonsense, spitting on others! Old26 carried nonsense about the S-300 and S-400 - not knowing the minimum height of interception of some anti-aircraft missiles, which is 5m, not 10m, while not knowing that usually: S-300, S-400 are usually used with Armor- C2, to intercept targets with a small image intensifier.

[2 Level Advisor]

Well, let's say this ... I served in the Strategic Missile Forces, Stary26 was related to the development of nuclear weapons ... and yes .. nothing more to the topic of the Strategic Missile Forces and ICBMs ... and commentators supporting the positions of the Operator (Andrey) above simply show a lack of knowledge about the practical use of ICBMs.
Because they write the theory, as you can do in theory, but in practice no one will ever do it for many reasons .. starting at least with the reason that to give an officer to the launcher an opportunity to launch a missile at his own discretion and for the purpose that he decides to hit or not, this is at least not clever, plus the enemies can also let Old via the communication channel from ZGRLS, plus why do we need an AOG for 5000 km, yes, and I’ll also note that the attack offered by Andrey is 4 BB for 1 MT using RS-26 possible even in theory, stupidly will not fly with such a weight, etc. ..
Therefore, through the Strategic Missile Forces command and control there is communication and management of strategic nuclear forces, which receives information from many sources, and then decides, but only this is not 5 minutes explicitly ..
And loading the coordinates of the target in real time at no complex in the world on the ICBM is carried out in a minute - this is several hours and the arrival of specialists with equipment .. because the target is always one, and the calculator calculates only the trajectory from the location of the launch to it .. this since it is in fact .. and letting rockets like in films sitting at a computer, having received information on the network, is impossible in any countries that own nuclear weapons, and thank God ..
In general, minus the gentlemen, as much as you want, this will not change reality, I cited the facts, and Andrei fantasies ..

P.S. Eugene, about what exactly you and I didn’t remember the discussion with Stary26, but in order to answer, I specially read my posts until May, I personally did not write anything about the S-300 and S-400, and this post about my proposal to use ICBMs as RCC nominated by Andrei ..

[Simfy]

subsonic (((

[san4es]

... placing on alert the regiment of the Su-34 with the X-35U will significantly increase the combat capabilities of the Russian Navy and VKS in the entire Asia-Pacific region.

Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers during practical combat missions at the Pacific Fleet's naval training ground completed practical launches of the latest aircraft-controlled Kh-35U anti-ship missiles.

[Operator]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

X-59MK2

The combined flight range of the aircraft anti-ship missile and the combat radius of its carrier aircraft must exceed the combined flight range of the LRASM air-to-ground cruise missile (1000 km) and the combat radius of the F-35C carrier-based aircraft (1140 km). At the same time, the line of air launch of anti-ship missiles should exceed the radio horizon of the Hokai deck-based AWACS aircraft (400 km) in order to prevent the departure of carrier-based aircraft with LRASM on board. Total 2540 km.

With a combat radius of Su-34 in 2000 km and a flight range of X-59МК2 in 500 km, the range deficit will be 40 km.

The hypersonic speed of anti-ship missiles (for overcoming the ship's air defense) is also preferable to the subsonic speed of the Kh-59MK2 or the supersonic speed of the anti-ship version of the "Caliber". Therefore, the "Dagger" drives in conjunction with the MiG-31 or, in the future, with the Su-34.

PS Again, the adoption of the RS-26 mobile MRBM with a nuclear RGCHIN in combination with the deployment of four Container ZGRLS along the perimeter of the national territory of the Russian Federation will make it possible to destroy the AUG and KUG at twice the range, essentially removing them from the American nuclear missile attacks.

[Sky strike fighter]

Forgive me, but in reality this is far from the case. For LRASM, you still need to make a flight mission, develop an operation, and only then act. So your theoretical calculations are useless. The dagger is essentially an air-based ballistic missile and it will be used against AUGs or other important targets. There will not be many daggers, unlike the X-59MK2.
RS-26 on AUG? To be honest, I have no words. Maybe immediately Voivode or Sarmatian?

[Operator]

AUG is not only an aircraft carrier, but about a dozen escort destroyers URO with up to 800 LRASM on board, i.e. more than an order of magnitude more than the number of carrier-based carrier aircraft.

Therefore, it is necessary to disable the AUG in a complex manner, for which the RGCHIN will be useful, covering the entire ship’s warrant with a distributed nuclear strike.

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: Saboteur Holuay

The fact is that there are not many fighters there, there’s nothing to trump

Since when, for the independent Russian fighters have become "ours" ???))))

[KJIETyc]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

This is all a theory ... but the practice is that there is enough for the Japanese Air Force and Navy to take away the islands and inflict damage on us ... to say nothing of the US 7th fleet and its bases in South Korea and especially in Japan? We are still there and nothing ... with one machine gun artillery division ...

If only 6 fleet did not sail from the coast of Belarus. It’s necessary to carry such nonsense. Let the Chinese first ask permission for an approach.

[Dmitry Schepachev]

For those who did not serve in the Far East, find out who their name is Kholulaevites, and then you will judge, he says everything correctly. And missiles in Khurb are a very necessary thing, according to the calculations of the General Staff of 2010, 2 AUGs of the enemy destroy everything !!! combat aircraft (in Primorye and the Khub territories), they suppress air defense both ship and land - while losing no more than 6-10 Khornets and that’s all !!!

[Aleks1973]

You did not answer the question!

[Operator]

Quote: Level 2 Advisor

the 4 BB hit on the 1 MT by means of the PC-26 is not possible even in theory, stupidly will not fly with such a weight

One warhead with a megaton thermonuclear charge weighs 320 kg

PS You served in the Strategic Rocket Forces?

[G. Georgiev]

This means that Russian aircraft can safely approach 250 km from the American ship without detection. I do not believe that everyone has a Khibiny REB system. Otherwise, the X-35 missile is a useless load.

[Aleks1973]

Quote: Romario_Argo

especially when on a link of 2 Su-34s: 2nd Kh-35U anti-ship missiles + 4th Kh-57MK2 + 4th Kh-31P + V-V missiles for self-defense
X-35U and X-31 immobilize and blind the ship - and X-57МК2 hit both on the surface - achieving the goal

And X-57mk2, what kind of organism is this?

[Aleks1973]

Quote: Dmitry Schepachev

according to the calculations of the General Staff of 2010, 2 AUGs of the enemy destroy everything !!! combat aircraft (in Primorye and the Khub territories), they suppress air defense both ship and land - while losing no more than 6-10 Khornets and that’s all !!!

Throw off the calculation of the General Staff of the Russian Federation 2010.! Have you come up with? Or was the calculation based on the fact that Serdyukov and Makarov would surrender everything?

[Dmitry Schepachev]

No Alexey, unfortunately at the exercises with V. Ivanov all these "tales" were confirmed

[Aleks1973]

How? And who is V. Ivanov? There are too many of them .... And what you wrote is possible only in one case, when all our aircraft will stupidly observe how they are being destroyed ....

[Dmitry Schepachev]

Valery Ivanov, former commander of 11 A Air Force and Air Defense, recently departed :(, good memory !!! as a leader, he was very strong and demanding, he knew him even by 8 K air defense. So all our air defense assets can be settled down on two MRAU, aviation will be saved very quick flight to spare, but the next two UIA will bury her too. Yes, and what is left of the aviation of the Far East ??? 3 regiments (Chernigovka cap does not count)

[Aleks1973]

Do you yourself believe that? And there will be no 2 and 3 hits, like the first, they haven’t even been trained on the Koreans yet ... If there is, then only a nuclear missile strike, mutual ...