“The Turkish military is there, and here the Russian ones”: Kurdish stones began to fly selectively

96

Entertaining news came in the form of two videos from Syria. They clearly show how, after a short conversation with the military, the local Kurdish population missed the vehicles of the military police of the Russian Federation and began to throw stones at the Turkish armored vehicles, realizing that "the Turkish military are there, and here the Russians."

Previously, protesters attacked all the cars indiscriminately, which caused mocking comments from a number of media. Footage appeared of how the Kurds even used a sledgehammer, striking the Russian military police with equipment. Now the Kurdish aggression of the population has become more directed.



Joint Russian-Turkish patrolling began on November 1. According to the agreements, such events should facilitate the withdrawal of Kursk units from the border at 30 km.



Turkish authorities insist on their right to control the “security zone” on the Syrian side. Not only the official government in Damascus, but many countries of the world opposed the deployment of Ankara’s troops. In particular, Israel was willing to help the Kurds with the goal of preventing ethnic cleansing in the region. In response, Turkey accused Israel of trying to create a “terrorist enclave” in the north of the SAR.



Earlier, part of the Kurds, represented by the chairman of the executive committee of the Syrian Democratic Committee, announced their readiness to join forces with official Damascus, as a condition putting forward a demand for the reorganization of government troops and considering the possibility of wide autonomy of the Syrian Kurdistan.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    96 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -30
      11 November 2019 13: 14
      The question is when the Afghanization of this territory will begin. All conditions are there.
      1. +40
        11 November 2019 13: 27
        Quote: Civil
        The question is when the Afghanization of this territory will begin. All conditions are there.

        "Afghanistan," on the other hand, is now slowly ending, as Assad, with the help of Russia and Iran, regains control over the territories. But I would like to avoid "afghanization".
        1. +14
          11 November 2019 13: 53
          “The Turkish military is there, and here the Russian ones”: Kurdish stones began to fly selectively
          I suspected that the stones were flying from the "dark people", they do not care, strangers, throw it, they said throw it, throw it ... it's just a matter of time for people to understand. in the tribes, I am sure, they do not distinguish Russian cars from Turkish ones, women, children, all evil, all enemies around, they have grown so much, what is their fault?
          1. +1
            11 November 2019 13: 58
            Well sorry it really needs to be fool color, form, our armored personnel carriers in the world know how to look
            1. +4
              11 November 2019 15: 06
              A little off topic.
              And what kind of Kalash in the frame?

              Somehow it is very similar to the AK-47. Where did such an ancient specimen come from?
              1. +3
                11 November 2019 16: 04
                Quote: kit88
                A little off topic.
                And what kind of Kalash in the frame?

                Somehow it is very similar to the AK-47. Where did such an ancient specimen come from?

                From the warehouses that they had. The arsenals of the Syrian army have accumulated about two million units of small arms of Soviet and Russian production. 700 thousand trunks were in the hands of the civilian population.
              2. +10
                11 November 2019 16: 45
                Base officers have the opportunity, choice. Some choose a proven caliber) good old 7,62
              3. +2
                11 November 2019 18: 13
                Quote: kit88
                A little off topic.
                And what kind of Kalash in the frame?

                Somehow it is very similar to the AK-47. Where did such an ancient specimen come from?

                He is this, AK-47, you can see on the fly block, the window is large and the bevel is large
                1. 0
                  11 November 2019 21: 49
                  - "47" ... And then what?
                  1. +6
                    11 November 2019 23: 11
                    Apparently, Mikhail Timofeevich really holds in his hands a prototype of a 1947 assault rifle called the AK-47. After refinement in 1949, adopted by the official name AK.




                    It must be clarified that with a light hand of Western partners, everyone calls the AK-1949 Kalashnikov assault rifle adopted in 47, although it is correct to call it simply AK.
                    1. +1
                      11 November 2019 23: 34
                      - Americanisms, however ... smile
              4. +5
                11 November 2019 20: 28
                Bulgarian AK. without compensator and front sight maximum window. Shipka produced such hundreds, in Albania the plant also stood. AK was collected. it’s AK not AKM, with an aiming scale of up to 800m and P. in general, who just didn’t let out calli .. and Romanians and Czechs and Poles and Germans. but this one is very similar to the Bulgarian or Soviet AK before the introduction of the DTC and the receiver can to be milled. This is the best weapon. If you have access to all types of ammunition, then consider yourself a surgeon. without jokes, the most prestigious weapon of all time. now if you are asked what kind of weapon you have and you say fn or G-3 or Famas then garbage .. and if you say AK then they start to be afraid of you. they say this is completely saiko ... I have long begun to notice this. not because it is reliable and eternal, but simply AK is a very prestigious weapon, especially if it is an early-type AKC with 20 low-profile charging magazines. Previously, these were done for scouts.
              5. +1
                11 November 2019 21: 39
                - Egyptian or Chinese ... Romanian ... The clutch on the trunk raises questions?
              6. +1
                12 November 2019 19: 57
                Somehow it is very similar to the AK-47

                I had one in a military school in the 80s. AKM.
            2. +5
              11 November 2019 15: 49
              Quote: bondrostov
              form our armored personnel carriers in the world know how to look out

              This is our knowing technique. In other countries, there are hardly many specialists who know their identity and classification.
            3. +6
              11 November 2019 17: 15
              Quote: bondrostov
              Well sorry it really needs to be fool color, form, our armored personnel carriers in the world know how to look

              In Turkey, BTR-80 and 60 are in service with the gendarmerie



            4. +4
              11 November 2019 19: 39
              Turkey has more than 500 BTR-60 and BTR-80, in the gendarmerie.

              Well, besides, I do not think that the Kurds are very versed in technology and can distinguish between Russian and Turkish, especially when they patrol the territory together.

              It is good that they throw only stones, and not shoot ATGMs.
            5. +1
              11 November 2019 22: 08
              The Kurds came to their senses and began to shout: "Forgive bro, the shaitan has beguiled!"
            6. 0
              25 November 2019 13: 13
              There, people do not know how to read. And anyone who does not fight FOR them is an enemy.
      2. +8
        11 November 2019 16: 44
        It was just necessary to hang the Russian flag on our armored cars and the Kurds would figure out who to throw stones at ...
      3. +2
        11 November 2019 16: 58
        The Turks, considering that such selective hostility of the Kurds is offensive for them, may decide on some crude provocation, up to the "accidental" shot by some Kurd.
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 17: 59
          So the Turks also had to hang their flag on their armored car and everything would be honest ...
        2. +1
          12 November 2019 11: 39
          Quote: Chaldon48
          some gross provocation, up to the "accidental" shot by some Kurd.

          Yes, with such a crowd, no provocations are needed - someone will bounce off a stone in the head ...
    2. +3
      11 November 2019 13: 16
      general circus now. they throw stones, slippers, flip flops (a statement of contempt among the Kurds says that you are not a person to beat you humanly, like a cockroach with slippers) laughing
      1. +2
        11 November 2019 13: 32
        The classics from the Gentlemen of Fortune reminded me. The truth was that there was snow, not stones. You don’t go here, you go there, otherwise the stone will be completely dead in the head. wink laughing
      2. +21
        11 November 2019 13: 46
        Quote: parkello
        general circus now

        I agree, the circus, whose members I would not wish to be our military. On the face of the situation, which is not good for the Kurds. How long will the Turks endure if they are selectively stoned like this every time? And this time, the first Turkish armored vehicle by aiming its machine gun at the Kurds clearly warns that it can open fire. And they will open it, sooner or later. And what do ours do in this situation? Protect the Turks? Protect the Kurds? Or just watch?
        In my opinion, it is necessary to convey to the population of these villages that such provocations, when our troops are nearby, are unacceptable.
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 14: 46
          In my opinion, it is necessary to convey to the population of these villages that such provocations, when our troops are nearby, are unacceptable.

          And when ours is not there, is it possible? And so I agree with you.
          1. +15
            11 November 2019 15: 04
            Quote: Archivist Vasya
            And when ours is not there, is it possible?

            This should not concern us. Turks have been fighting the Kurds for hundreds of years. Russia did not sign up to reconcile them. Russia has committed to withdraw Kurdish armed formations from the border. If the Kurds themselves climb with provocations, then the Turks have the right to answer them. If the Kurds do not obey us and want to become victims of their own provocations, we cannot prevent them from doing this. We can only provide them with a calm life, without war, if they do not go beyond the framework of the agreements made by Russia before Turkey. No more and no less. A victim cannot dictate a condition to his protector and patron.
        2. +4
          11 November 2019 15: 41
          Quote: kjhg
          And this time, the first Turkish armored vehicle by aiming its machine gun at the Kurds clearly warns that it can open fire.

          It seems more like they wanted to save optics by spontaneous maneuvers upside down than to aim. Unlike the Tiger, they are remotely controlled there. Kurds have vast experience in mining track routes, and the head vehicles are Russian.
        3. 0
          12 November 2019 09: 02
          As in American ..... UNACCEPTABLE .... Or maybe just the North Scribe?
        4. +1
          12 November 2019 11: 47
          Quote: kjhg
          I agree, the circus,

          ... especially judging by the number of cameras ...
      3. +3
        11 November 2019 13: 47
        Well, the Kurds on one machine should understand where the Russians and where the Turks. they should know perfectly well the Kalashnikov assault rifle
        1. +4
          11 November 2019 13: 54
          Quote: vadson
          Well, the Kurds on one machine should understand where the Russians and where the Turks. they should know perfectly well the Kalashnikov assault rifle

          there is a "kalashmat" for everyone ...
          1. +2
            11 November 2019 13: 56
            the Turks too?
            1. +3
              11 November 2019 16: 53
              German, from the former GDR
      4. +2
        11 November 2019 14: 13
        Quote: parkello
        general circus now. they throw stones, slippers, flip flops (a statement of contempt among the Kurds says that you are not a person to beat you humanly, like a cockroach with slippers) laughing

        I’ll catch any provocateur, throw a grenade from behind the crowd - it won’t be a laughing matter ...
    3. -1
      11 November 2019 13: 17
      Kurdish stones began to fly selectively

      Hey turk
      Don’t go there, go here!
      The stone head will hit
      You’ll be completely dead ... lol
      1. +5
        11 November 2019 14: 08
        Or maybe so ...
    4. +5
      11 November 2019 13: 18
      Let the Kurds thank us again (before throwing stones at us) that there is a joint patrol, if there weren’t us, the Turks would have long ago (most likely) used weapons against them.
      1. -5
        11 November 2019 13: 48
        with paint bags they throw their loboviki and they won’t go far laughing
        1. +8
          11 November 2019 15: 42
          Quote: vadson
          with paint bags they throw their loboviki and they won’t go far

          And what will happen next? The cornered ones have little choice, either to sit and wait until they are set on fire, or to open aimed fire. And what do you think the soldiers who have full weapons and BP will do? And what, in this case, you order to do VP of the Russian Federation.
    5. +1
      11 November 2019 13: 18
      "the Turkish military is there, and the Russian military here."

      Well, so RT explained. tongue
    6. +7
      11 November 2019 13: 24
      Quote: Skay
      "the Turkish military is there, and the Russian military here."

      Well, so RT explained. tongue

      Listen, on the second video at the beginning, for 7-8 seconds, the question sounds from the Kurdish - Russia and after confirmation from our military, the Kurd gives an order and everyone runs to the Turkish cars. He who has ears, but hears.
      1. +2
        11 November 2019 13: 33
        Kurds, learn the materiel! -) Our ,, tiger ,, is hard to confuse with something.
        1. +4
          11 November 2019 13: 51
          and it’s always like, of course, who understood and not the first time they saw them, he immediately understood who was where and the salag from the aul? Yes, do not care for him
          1. -1
            11 November 2019 19: 11
            It seems to be done on its base. At least at first.
            1. +1
              11 November 2019 22: 46
              Confused with the Trot.
        2. +6
          11 November 2019 13: 56
          Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
          Kurds, learn the materiel! -) Our ,, tiger ,, is hard to confuse with something.

          for "children of deserts and ruins" the technical part is not interesting
          1. +2
            11 November 2019 16: 06
            Quote: Aerodrome
            for "children of deserts and ruins" the technical part is not interesting

            These children of deserts and ruins quite professionally treated with anti-tank systems and MANPADS.
            PMSM, they just had no such thing as friendly side technique: All vehicles were considered enemy by default. smile
            1. +1
              11 November 2019 18: 34
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Quote: Aerodrome
              for "children of deserts and ruins" the technical part is not interesting

              These children of deserts and ruins quite professionally treated with anti-tank systems and MANPADS.
              PMSM, they just had no such thing as friendly side technique: All vehicles were considered enemy by default. smile

              I think, "if water is not distributed, and a snack" - you can "extinguish" ... everyone in a row - this is how I see the line of thinking of the "regions" ... further, only DNA is corrected.
        3. 0
          12 November 2019 19: 46
          Did they see him before then ?!
          Do we have a lot of women and children in our home country, and some "M" also distinguish the armored personnel carrier -60 from the 70,80,90 osto ... for many of them an armored personnel carrier is generally a tank, and there will be those who confuse the H-1 Tiger!
          And what the Turks had with our Typhoon-K and -U is hardly distinguished. And you talk about the Kurds from the village in addition ...
    7. +10
      11 November 2019 13: 25
      All the same, there is nothing good in this news. Tigers did not beat and okay. But God forbid there comes to shooting, all the same, everyone will fall under the distribution.
      1. +9
        11 November 2019 13: 28
        Quote: alexmach
        But God forbid there comes to shooting, all the same, everyone will fall under the distribution.


        Sooner or later, they will provoke ...
        1. +5
          11 November 2019 13: 30
          If Syria succeeds in reconciling sooner or later, it will be a great victory.
          1. +4
            11 November 2019 13: 32
            And we have no other choice, and any war ends in peace.
    8. +8
      11 November 2019 13: 27
      The Turks themselves send on patrol a couple of times. The number of boys with stones will be less.
      1. +1
        11 November 2019 13: 46
        There, a car with water cannons is needed for the Turks
    9. +2
      11 November 2019 13: 32
      Very interesting. Curious, who explained to them where whose cars? The marks were always on the cars, and very readable, only now has the order not to touch our patrols come?
      1. -5
        11 November 2019 13: 48
        Yes, it’s difficult to confuse everything even in color. By the way, I didn’t see the video so they threw it at ours.
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 13: 51
          It was, it was ... the second patrol seems it was. There, the first Tiger going decently got so right in the frontal.
          1. +4
            11 November 2019 13: 59
            Quote: Wedmak
            the second patrol seems it was.

            Not only the second, but also the first. It's just that in the video of the first patrol, the part where our cars are thrown is cut by some hoopoe. As if from this, the very fact of the attack disappears. Uncut videos immediately appeared on YouTube.
        2. 0
          11 November 2019 15: 07
          http://avia.pro/news/kurdy-napali-na-rossiyskih-voennyh-i-seryozno-povredili-broneavtomobil-tigr?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2Fnews
          So take a look. They threw it. And they also used paint by the way.
      2. +2
        11 November 2019 15: 57
        Quote: Wedmak
        Very interesting. Curious, who explained to them where whose cars? The marks were always on the cars, and very readable, only now has the order not to touch our patrols come?

        I wonder if they are prevented from installing flags on cars? I stuck the Russian flag - and it all became clear to those who are not very versed in the types of equipment, uniforms, weapons and other things.
    10. +6
      11 November 2019 13: 43
      Gentlemen, you look but do not see.
      It doesn't matter, in fact, whose forces "MR" are in favor today, and whose ones are in disgrace, it is important - who ordered? (or "cui prodest").
      Look at the number of cameras, on tripods, expensive and good stream or action cameras, shooting a second video - professionally selects good angles, keeps confident and not forced (maybe this is an RT reporter), an expensive camera lens slipped a couple of times in frames. The protesters are well placed, do not interfere with the shooters, successfully throw stones at the car, and do not shoot down the shooters, even shout very intelligible phrases.

      Tomorrow, the customer will turn his eyes to the other side and will throw at other cars.
      Who is the customer? I don’t know, I can only assume Israel. Justify - I can’t, yet .... can anyone help?

      ZY Having watched the video again, I'll add a couple more notes - the protesters are throwing stones in the direction of the cemetery, is it real? Take a closer look, the road runs along the cemetery, a "spontaneous" meeting on the other side. They throw stones exactly at the windows (protected by special plastic) or into the armor, a couple of hits in the mirrors and almost none of the expensive equipment and weapons of armored vehicles ...

      Z.Z.Y. damn ... the impression is that the customer ...... YES WELL AT !!!! no ... this cannot be ...
      1. +2
        11 November 2019 13: 56
        protesters throw stones toward the cemetery, is that real?

        If the cemetery is not theirs, why not? By the way, houses are not visible in the district, what kind of desert place is this?
        a couple of hits in the mirrors and almost none in expensive equipment and armament of armored vehicles

        Yes, they just don’t know apparently. Windows - this is the first element, not covered by armor, which catches your eye, and they aim at it. To be sure. Until the machine gun still need to be thrown and you get it or not, another question. Optics and equipment also somehow do not particularly stand out.
        But you are right, the attackers have undergone some training or instruction, this can be seen.
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 14: 08
          Dear Denis, optics and weapons are not just "imperceptibly" put up for review, well, it's a combat vehicle, albeit lightly armored. I agree that women and children under the age of 9 do not understand, but men ?! And still - flying stones, not knowing the terrain and soils of northern Syria, I can only assume that they were brought / brought, the terrain is deserted, mostly shell rock (soft rock), but the stones stacked along the road, and in some places scattered along the road, were clearly brought.
          The place is really deserted, houses in the neighborhood are not visible, but cars are visible in the last frames of the video (No. 2), and this is just one more cent for the "custom rally".
          1. +1
            11 November 2019 14: 21
            Well this is a combat vehicle, albeit lightly armored. I agree that women and children under the age of 9 do not understand, but men? !!

            Well I do not know. I put myself in their place: when I saw an armored military car driving, where would I throw a stone in the first place, fiercely hating those sitting in it? It’s not possible to break through the window, they don’t take his bullets, but I’ll express my "phi" in this way (okay, maybe not my own, but custom, not the essence). You can, of course, try to knock down the optics, break the antennas, throw a crowbar at the wheel ... but it's easier to do this - a stone in your hand, threw it out the window.
            1. +3
              11 November 2019 14: 28
              well ... to each his own .... I would throw the "weapon of the proletariat" at the thing that is spinning all over the place ... I will break my cell ....

              but we agree on one thing - the action is staged, explicit, and well-planned, signs:
              1. Organized transport / tray of shells;
              2. Organized transportation of personnel (cars, even cars);
              3. The protesters are organized and on the one hand in order to exclude "friendly fire";
              4. The press is aware (there I have counted at least 7-10 reporters, not including filming), prepared and acts as written;
              5. The place was chosen successfully - the cemetery passes in the background, and this is already a plus in the treasury of protesters;
              6. The Russian peacekeeper did not even get a date in the forehead when he got out of the car to "solve" the problem.
              1. +4
                11 November 2019 17: 06
                Quote: The Stoker
                The Russian peacekeeper did not even get a date in the forehead when he got out of the car to "settle" the problem.

                This is the most important thing that I paid attention to. In addition, he explains with gestures - "don't throw here, throw there" - and they listen to him! Some kind of oxymoron!
            2. +2
              11 November 2019 16: 05
              Quote: Wedmak
              Well I do not know. I put myself in their place: when I saw an armored military vehicle riding, where would I throw a stone in the first place, fiercely hating those sitting in it?

              I would, having seen the armored car, be careful not to throw a stone - you never know what is on the mind of the pelemetik on the armored car. Maybe he ate stale fruit today and is puffed up by a desire to plant a nibul.
              It would be more useful to throw a grenade. But for this, it is necessary to provide for escape routes, and not a selfie angle.
    11. 0
      11 November 2019 13: 46
      Turks aren’t us, they can be crazy!
    12. +3
      11 November 2019 13: 49
      "........ as a condition, putting forward the demand for the reorganization of government forces and consideration of the possibility of broad autonomy for "Syrian Kurdistan".

      At the beginning of the war, Assad was not opposed, and ours, too. But no, seduce the USA
      who promised "statehood" together with the Iraqi Kurds.
      I wonder if a couple of American Hummers with a banner would be launched into this column? How these "stone throwers" would react to them.
      Actually, they are good at it. They are clearly organized - both old and young, and even women on a tray of "shells".
      1. +4
        11 November 2019 13: 57
        They threw these hammers when the Americans draped out of town.
    13. 0
      11 November 2019 13: 55
      Here you are not there
    14. +4
      11 November 2019 14: 09
      our guys have steel balls in their pants! the Kurds at first were taken aback when a Russian soldier came to them.
    15. +3
      11 November 2019 14: 18
      Savages, sir))

      It can be seen that they recognized the Russian cars, they were left alone, they threw the Turks.
    16. The comment was deleted.
    17. +3
      11 November 2019 14: 24
      Clean up, have you seen what size of cobblestones they launch, and at what distance ?? They don't need ATGMs "
      1. +2
        11 November 2019 14: 32
        Yes, they can launch RPGs from wind pipes. And if along a parabolic trajectory, the ATGM and the engine will not be needed. wink
        1. 0
          11 November 2019 16: 56
          And if the crowd is bigger, then here is the first Kurdish MLRS laughing
    18. 0
      11 November 2019 15: 57
      Yes, because ours were together with the Turks (well, how’s cooperation), so the subject is crazy
    19. +4
      11 November 2019 16: 01
      Let them throw stones as much as they want. The Turks need so that there are no people there who previously terrorized Turkey itself. As long as they are with the stones, all is normal. But if they are with weapons or bombs, then the Turks will punish without hesitation ...
    20. 0
      11 November 2019 16: 35
      Quote: kjhg
      Quote: Archivist Vasya
      And when ours is not there, is it possible?

      Turks have been fighting the Kurds for hundreds of years.

      Actually, the Turks with the Kurds (PKK) lived for hundreds of years without any Turks, and they have been fighting since 1978 (from the date the Kurdish Workers' Party was formed).
    21. +4
      11 November 2019 17: 10
      It should be noted that among the Kurds, several operators with good equipment were immediately found, several tripods with cameras were installed in advance, which remained intact and in place, and indeed the "attack" was clearly well prepared and planned. That is, pure provocation.
    22. -3
      11 November 2019 17: 17
      Earlier in the Russian press, the presence of small and large psychotronic generators was mentioned. Mr. Gorbachev said that they can also be used by satellites with directional effects on the earth. There are mini-options that also affect the human psyche. Why not develop, adapt and use them.
      1. +1
        11 November 2019 21: 02
        ... Mr. Gorbachev said ...

        Ha ha ha! Gorbachev spoke! He also said that right now he would arrange "socialism with a human face" for us, but such a mug of a capitalist ghoul came out, so much blood was drunk ... This one said ... namely, that Mr. ...
    23. 0
      11 November 2019 18: 21
      Indeed, it is very similar to the production. Judging by the tripods and cameras. Let's wait what will happen next. hi
    24. +2
      11 November 2019 18: 25
      Quote: kjhg
      And what do ours do in this situation? Protect the Turks? Protect the Kurds? Or just watch?

      Blame away. Otherwise, they will be raked from both sides. This is not our war.
    25. 0
      11 November 2019 18: 36
      Hide the "stick", poor ones. Bashar al-Assad is much more democratic than the Saudis and Qatari sheikhs you support.
    26. +1
      11 November 2019 18: 43
      Quote: Alexander Petrov1
      It was just necessary to hang the Russian flag on our armored cars and the Kurds would figure out who to throw stones at ...

      I guess, yes. Flags are not flags, but some kind of insignia are needed ..
    27. 0
      11 November 2019 18: 45
      Quote: Zaurbek
      The Turks themselves send on patrol a couple of times. The number of boys with stones will be less.

      It can happen this way and vice versa. They didn’t think that your Turks were hiding.
      And there, after all, no stones can fly. If the Turks themselves go.
    28. 0
      11 November 2019 19: 19
      There is no circus here and local entertain themselves as they can
    29. +2
      11 November 2019 20: 55
      Interestingly, what is the purpose of such a patrol? When our guys are fighting with bandits, this is one thing, and when they are forced to be moving targets, (thank God the savages throw stones, and not worse), it's another! What for?! If you really need patrol, let the Su-34 patrol ...
    30. 0
      12 November 2019 10: 53
      But I didn’t understand anything.
      That is, our patrols with the Turks, runs out and says the Turks throw in them.
      And how did the Turks react to this? Like, but normal, but the dude explained everything to them.
      Or can it still lead to some misunderstanding or even insult?
      In general, Nitsche is not clear. Why is this all?
    31. 0
      12 November 2019 13: 46
      Turks are patrolling with ours. Let the Kurds say that if they throw stones, then the Turks will patrol without us!
    32. 0
      13 November 2019 00: 07
      Something tells me that the Aborigines are all the same in whom to throw boulders. They are dark people, they have not seen the plug, what they will be told, they do. And the answer should be adequate. Throw the same bricks into them, or kick them with a sledgehammer. I don’t think that they could frighten the Russians or, God forbid, overcome them.
    33. 0
      13 November 2019 10: 54
      A visual aid for those who “choose” wrong allies)

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"