The "Ministry of Internal Affairs of Libya," announced the destruction of the ZRPK "Shell"

In Libya, one of the Russian-made Pantsir air defense systems has been destroyed, said Fakhti Bashag, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, in a recent interview. According to him, the complex was installed on a German-made chassis, as was done at the time by order of the UAE.

Information about the destruction of the Pantsir air defense missile system appeared in the Arabic-speaking resource Defense-Arabic.com.

Earlier it was reported that the troops of Khalifa Haftar had at their disposal one anti-aircraft missile-gun complex "Shell" of Russian production. It is believed that the ZRPK entered Libya from the United Arab Emirates.

Over the past few days, Mr. Bashaga has repeatedly turned to “Russian” topics. Not so long ago, he said that Moscow was "adding fuel to the fire" of the Libyan conflict, sending mercenaries to the country and weapon.

It should be noted that in Libya there is still no single authority, therefore the statements of Bashagi should be perceived only from the position of the so-called "internationally recognized" regime in Tripoli, which controls only the country's capital and some other territories.

The second government is located in Tobruk under the auspices of Marshal Khalifa Haftar, who in April this year launched an unsuccessful assault on Tripoli. It is with this government of the Russian Federation that it has the most strong contacts. Haftara is also secretly supported by some Arabian monarchies.

In addition, a number of tribal groups and real terrorists (including ISIS banned in Russia) operate in the field in Libya, which are not subordinate to any government, holding certain sections of the country's territory by force of arms.

Comments

[rocket757]

States NO! There will be a long bootleg, because none of the concrete, strong ones wants to get involved in this bootleg.

[Spartanez300]

Without evidence, this statement seems unfounded.
Libya most likely will not be able to recover from the intervention of American "democracy" for a long time.

[rocket757]

Quote: Spartanez300

intervention of American "democracy".

There, the entire dermocratic community has trampled down!
And when everyone destroys, to restore nobody, personally, is not!
In short, the business will not be "drunkard"!

[Narcolog]

Judging by the official statements, they are not going to. They ask the Americans, who have ruined and actually destroyed Libya, for "protection" from "Russian aggression" ... "More Hell !!!" (from)

[bessmertniy]

The West washed its hands here - it scoured Libya and abandoned it. Now it will be like Afghan smoldering indefinitely.

[Luvad]

How did the Union pummel Afghanistan in due time?

[Ivan 1980]

The USSR in Afghanistan built a lot of things for the local population, unlike all the nat and the usa.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Spartanez300

Without evidence, this statement seems unfounded.

Here it is already clear that this pepper is an Anglo-Saxon puppet bought with giblets. And the arms market is a very tasty morsel for any arms supplier. So he throws excrement on the fan ... only this man in the street can eat it, but the specialists meant his words.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: rocket757

States NO! There will be a long tramp because none of the concrete, strong ones wants to get involved in this bodyweight.

Everything there is behind the scenes and little by little. Russia and France are blowing towards Haftar, and mattresses, British and Turks are drowning for Sarajah. Here in the summer, the Haftarovites shot down the Sarajevo plane and captured the pilot, either a Belgian or a Dutchman, which suggests that NATO representatives are directly involved. As long as there is oil and no national leader, this Libyan garden will be plowed by all and sundry.

[rocket757]

That's when dad TRUMP says that he loves Libyan oil, then CASES go ... and for now, affairs, not under the account of any of the officials. Who, then, will refuse from the black mass ... of the box office?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: rocket757

That's when dad TRUMP says that he loves Libyan oil, then CASES go ... and for now, affairs, not under the account of any of the officials.

In this regard, with regard to Libyan oil, so far only small British have noted, when a couple of years ago they said that - "We warn the Russian bear that he would not stick his paws into Libya," to which Sergei Kuzhugetovich replied - "What's They are painted on the coat of arms? Tiger seems? So let them know that not every cat is given the right to point out something to the bear "(not literally, but somehow).

[Oyo Sarkazmi]

Quote: Nyrobsky

for Libyan oil, so far only the British have noted

Nope. In Libya, the oil is produced by the Libyan-American company (from Libya - the former state), the American special forces are guarding the oil fields .. There was a noise when the oil pipeline to the sea was blown up.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Oyo Sarkazmi

Quote: Nyrobsky

for Libyan oil, so far only the British have noted

Nope. In Libya, the oil is produced by the Libyan-American company (from Libya - the former state), the American special forces are guarding the oil fields .. There was a noise when the oil pipeline to the sea was blown up.

I’m not in terms of production, but in terms of the statements made ... If Trump was broadcasting about Syrian oil, then only the British have reported on Libyan oil. As for security, in my opinion the American special forces were withdrawn as soon as Haftar moved to Tripoli. The information that he was returned back, I have not yet met anywhere. You can read about what they dumped here.
https://inosmi.ru/politic/20190409/244914442.html

[Oyo Sarkazmi]

Oil is already "them", a pipe to the sea - "them", pumped and taken out without restrictions and control. So what's the noise?
In Syria, oil is "theirs", and Assad has a pipe. Turks do not allow Kurds to be taken out. Therefore, we must boast about our economy - we protect the oil, export it, and in return - only cookies for the Kurdish "degenerates".

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Oo sarcasm

Oil is already "them", a pipe to the sea - "them", pumped and taken out without restrictions and control.

For this, they eliminated Gaddafi. Ordinary racketeering at the state level, relying on the army, according to another classification-international robbery ..

[rocket757]

Quote: Nyrobsky

"We warn the Russian bear not to stick his paws into Libya."

So on the islands, the prime ministers and other ministers, the applicants, are changing at such a speed that you do not have time to get used to them.
It's time to get used to the fact that they have an accelerated "rotation of" faces ...
however, they all talk the same thing!
Probably because of the fact that their "cat, a formidable beast" has licked for a long time ... only crap, spoils the air, however, very "high quality", this cannot be taken away from them!

[Alexander Petrov1]

It is necessary for a very strong president to take power, such as General Al-Sisi, like their neighbor in Egypt.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

It is necessary for a very strong president to take power, such as General Al-Sisi, like their neighbor in Egypt.

If Haftar takes Tripoli, Libya will be headed either by his son (Seif) or his daughter (Aisha) Gaddafi since their candidacy will support the majority of the population of Libya. Haftar, in spite of the fact that he was in opposition to their father, will not mind taking the post of Minister of Defense, unless of course he manages to eliminate the forces behind Sarajah because sick old man.

[Alexander Petrov1]

Marshal Haftar is supported by Russia, so he is more likely to win ...

[Marconi41]

I wonder how they destroyed it? And how was it used? I would not be surprised if it was used as small-caliber artillery.

[tlauicol]

Quote: Marconi41

I wonder how they destroyed it? And how was it used? I would not be surprised if it was used as small-caliber artillery.

Shot down in the summer of l39. Intended use

[Fedor Sokolov]

Proofs in the studio, because talking is not to roll bags. This message does not inspire confidence especially against the background of the outdated Soviet and French military equipment in service with the "Trypillian government".

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Give the monkey ,, armor ,, ...

[Meliodous]

And what does the Russian Federation have to do with it? The complex was Emirate - they themselves wrote. We sold them, and what's next with him is their business.
And what they destroyed is not that he is bad, but that he fought. Only those weapons that are on display are not knocked out.

[Narcolog]

Some "Carapace" is being destroyed, others are "storming Kaliningrad" ... Too many storytellers have divorced.

[Kibl]

"Walk the field" of the Libyan bottling. Give the monkey a grenade, expect trouble! And then immediately "Shell"!

[Pavel57]

Photo of the wrong Shell.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Pavel57

Photo of the wrong Shell.

Yes, it is clear that KamAZ is not a "German production".

the complex was installed on a German-made chassis, as was done at the time by order of the UAE

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Pavel57

Photo of the wrong Shell.

Moreover, newer than the emirate - judging by the radar.
Here is the Emirati "Pantsir" (their photos are full on the network):

[AML]

How lovely. Destruction is, and how is not destroyed. Was the crew destroyed in battle or sloppiness? Or maybe the dogs were bitten by pencils? .

[aszzz888]

AML (Anatolii) Today, 10: 36 NEW
+1
How lovely. Destruction is, and how is not destroyed.

Yes. They drank the roofing felts to their fellow tribesmen, or for kalym - and then wrote off them as destroyed, burned the roofing felts nearby, and burned them by gouging, loaded roofing felts through the trunk .... infa so-so - you won’t guess.

[Old26]

Quote: Narcolog

Some "Carapace" is being destroyed, others are "storming Kaliningrad" ... Too many storytellers have divorced.

Why storytellers. Or in Syria, the same "shell" was not multiplied by zero? He's indestructible. They could well have destroyed.

[Dali]

Quote: Old26

Why storytellers. Or in Syria, the same "shell" was not multiplied by zero? He's indestructible. They could well have destroyed.

It is the storytellers ... And to cite the destroyed shell in Syria as an example is the height of demagogy ... it’s as a merit to write down, to the teeth of an armed bandit, an attack on an unarmed man!

[Lord of the Sith]

Instead of a thousand words

[Old26]

Quote: Dali

Quote: Old26

Why storytellers. Or in Syria, the same "shell" was not multiplied by zero? He's indestructible. They could well have destroyed.

It is the storytellers ... And to cite the destroyed shell in Syria as an example is the height of demagogy ... it’s as a merit to write down, to the teeth of an armed bandit, an attack on an unarmed man!

Why is the height of demagoguery? That, in Syria, the "Shell" was not destroyed. After all, we are not talking about the method of destroying this installation (by aviation or not, "empty" or fully combat-ready). It is about the very fact of destruction. What prevented in the mess, that now in Libya, shandarah on the same "shell" from a grenade launcher? Or cover with artillery fire (mortar). Or just make it go up in a mine?
What, do you seriously think that if these are weapons of Russian manufacture, but it is physically impossible to destroy?

And it will take a very long time to get "proof" from the mess that is now going on in Libya. Well destroyed that of this. The probability is very high

[Dimy4]

The minister of some kind of public utilities there has not yet announced the sunken Russian submarine?

[sivuch]

It is strange that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of this shop reports, and not the MO. You might think that their police (in the sense of another gang, but with epaulets) carried out a detention, and the Shell escaped and fired.

[sivuch]

Or maybe the minuser will express his complaints? Of course, there can be anything in the Libyan booth, and the same Shell can be destroyed with anything - even from an RPG. But such a statement should be made by the Moscow Region or the General Staff or similar structures and with at least some evidence.

[rotmistr60]

Over the past few days, Mr. Bashaga has repeatedly turned to the “Russian” theme ... should be taken only from the standpoint of the so-called “Internationally recognized” regime in Tripoli

Whoever has determined the legitimacy of the Bashag regime is the one who "dances the girl", so it is not surprising that the Russian theme is repeatedly mentioned. And such harsh and unsupported statements that Moscow is "adding fuel to the fire" are perfectly understandable.

[Old26]

Quote: Dimy4

The minister of some kind of public utilities there has not yet announced the sunken Russian submarine?

Guys, but do not scuff. There is a civil war, what’s going on there - only Allah will understand. Who is fighting with whom, too. And who and what voiced - it does not matter.
No, I certainly understand that very, very many do not want our weapons to be destroyed. But alas - war. Both Soviet T-72s and American Abrams can burn there.

[Pavel57]

Or maybe he wasn’t destroyed, but stolen and sold.

[Ilya_Nsk]

One line about destruction, why the rest of the text? One "Shell" in the field is not a warrior .. Maybe they "drank" it, and dumped it on the saboteurs or threw it into a ditch, like ours ...

[Alien From]

In the light of recent events, it seems to me that this is a deliberate discrediting of our weapons, again calls with mattress deeds ..... who thinks ??

[Grigory Gromov]

Alien From (Alien From)! Yes, you are Janus, "my friend"! All your comments are designed for fools and the illiterate, judging by your statements against Russia and at the same time for, so as not to minus!

[Alien From]

You obviously have a phobia ......

[Grigory Gromov]

Alien From (Alien From), you have not only a phobia, but an outright dirty lie ... From your comments, everything is visible! Janus, there is Janus!

[Alien From]

no comments)))

[K-36]

[quote = Old26] [quote = Dali] [quote = Old26] Why storytellers. Or in Syria, the same "shell" was not multiplied by zero? He's indestructible. They could well have destroyed

And it will take a very long time to get "evidence" from the mess that is now going on in Libya. Well destroyedthat of this. The probability is very high [/ quote]

Vladimir, "I'm in sorrow." After all, you and I seem to have discussed the topic untested info. I mean:
1. TASS. Army and defense industry.
2. GA (Global adventure).
3.Balancer.com.
4.bmpd
And only then ... Can you (for me) soundly explain why you do not ignore such an empty snowstorm like this?
Among those minuses that you grabbed, my minus is not. However in your "notebook" I put this minus sign. Precisely for the fact of getting into an outright "fornicator". There is no theme (in essence), there is only a cheap sketch. And you comment on it ... It's wrong ("I think so"). I will not deny that I am looking for sane and self-conscious interlocutors. I consider the ideological sects "urya-patriots" and "vsepros..alipolymers" to be radical and unconstructive. I hoped (and hope) to see you as a companion.
Regards,

[hydrox]

A rare sanity :: indeed, the topic of the harlot and the draft of a good word does not deserve - because the goal is indefinable ...

[Alien From]

Yes dear. I will join you in this matter! Kryakalschikov here more than necessary !!!

[EnGenius]

The United States is ready to turn the entire Arab-Iranian region into eternal Afghanistan.

[Shield]

As the saying goes: "Pulled - show the result" ... And then they learned to speak from the people, but no evidence

[Old26]

[quote = К-36] [quote = Old26] [quote = Dali] [quote = Old26] Why storytellers. Or in Syria, the same "shell" was not multiplied by zero? He's indestructible. They could well have destroyed

And it will take a very long time to get "evidence" from the mess that is now going on in Libya. Well destroyedthat of this. The probability is very high [/ quote]

Vladimir, "I'm in sorrow." After all, you and I seem to have discussed the topic untested info. I mean:
1. TASS. Army and defense industry.
2. GA (Global adventure).
3.Balancer.com.
4.bmpd
And only then ... Can you (for me) soundly explain why you do not ignore such an empty snowstorm like this?
Among those minuses that you grabbed, my minus is not. However in your "notebook" I put this minus sign. Precisely for the fact of getting into an outright "fornicator". There is no theme (in essence), there is only a cheap sketch. And you comment on it ... It's wrong ("I think so"). I will not deny that I am looking for sane and self-conscious interlocutors. I consider the ideological sects "urya-patriots" and "vsepros..alipolymers" to be radical and unconstructive. I hoped (and hope) to see you as a companion.
Regards, [/ Quote]
YOU are right, Victor. I got into this harlot, I repent.
The list, your written, is also far from complete and cannot serve as a standard. It’s always very difficult to talk about reliability and reliability. It happens that TASS carries a blizzard, and on Adventure grains of truth appear among the mass of garbage. And it happens and vice versa.
It’s just sometimes that the reaction of the bulk of the writers is surprising, which even theoretically cannot accept the fact that Soviet (Russian) weapons, like everything else, can be destroyed.
Moreover, in this case, the very fact of the destruction of the launcher is not something decisive. After all, these are not "classic" military operations, when one can speak of the "pluses" and "minuses" of this installation. It is more of a guerrilla warfare. And what and how is happening in the conditions of the civil war - no one will ever say.
Maybe there really was no destruction of the "Shell" and this information is fake. And maybe vice versa. One of the groups "banged" such an installation at its enemy. And it is not a fact that there are or will appear documentary facts confirming or refuting this event.
And this fact or fake - HZ. Personally, I think that this could well be there ...

By the way, their "sworn friends" have a well-built system of information designations, built on reliability and reliability. The most reliable and reliable information they have has the A1 index (absolutely reliable and constantly confirmed information). And the least reliable and reliable is F6 (when it is impossible to judge reliability and plausibility). Well, all the other intermediate options.

[quote = Schilda] As the saying goes: "Pulled-show the result" ... And then they learned to speak from the people, but there is no evidence [/ quote]
Alas, it is not always possible to document it. For example, today there was an infa that the Syrian troops have lost three so-called "assault tanks", created on the basis of the ARV (on the T-72 chassis) over the past few days. And there are photographs of the death of this third-largest assault tank. But I have not seen the photo of the previous two. Well, there are no more likely on the network. So what to do? Believe it without providing evidence or not. Here everyone decides for himself

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Old26

It’s just sometimes that the reaction of the bulk of the writers is surprising, which even theoretically cannot accept the fact that Soviet (Russian) weapons, like everything else, can be destroyed.

And not just anywhere, but in those very regions where they traditionally loved to lose our weapons in various ways.
One war in Chad was worth what - when the Libyan expeditionary forces, well armed with Soviet weapons, were defeated by partisans in Toyota.

[Oleg Salov]

Nonsense unproven!

[Dmitry Donskoy]

Quote: rocket757

States NO! There will be a long bootleg, because none of the concrete, strong ones wants to get involved in this bootleg.

I think that the hour of Libya has not come yet