British General: Russia is able to start World War III

52

The chief of the British defense headquarters, General Nick Carter, believes that Moscow could “accidentally” start the third world war. His words are quoted by The Telegraph.

According to a senior military official, there are more and more new threats in the world, and Russia is conducting a disinformation campaign regarding the US presidential election of 2020 and the African region.



Carter noted that the Russian authorities hardly want to start a war by traditional means, but "reckless behavior and disrespect for international law" can lead to this. “Similarly”, global conflict flared up in the 1914 year.

As an example of such activity, a recent raid of ten Russian submarines is mentioned, of which eight are nuclear-powered submarines that went on a campaign in October, passing Britain, Iceland and Greenland. According to the Norwegian secret services, this mission was designed to prove that Russia, if necessary, can strike at the east coast of the United States.

It is worth noting that many readers of the British media reacted to the article with a certain amount of skepticism, noting in the comments that it is not yet clear who exactly is capable of starting a full-fledged war. Others traditionally remembered Brexit and the desire to cover up the obvious difficulties on the way out of the EU with a “Russian” theme.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    52 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      11 November 2019 09: 32
      The chief of the British defense headquarters, General Nick Carter, believes that Moscow could “accidentally” start the third world war. His words are quoted by The Telegraph.
      Did you hear "highley like" in it?
      According to a senior military official, there are more and more new threats in the world, and Russia is conducting a disinformation campaign regarding the US presidential election of 2020 and the African region.
      And the question of "Brexit" as a subject of the English crown worries him least of all, it would be better if he accused us of this ... it would be more patriotic.
      As an example of such activity, the recent raid of ten Russian submarines, of which eight are nuclear-powered, that went on a hike in October, passing Britain, Iceland and Greenland, is mentioned.
      Alas, what about the "mighty" British fleet, something like that simply cannot be repeated ...?
      1. +4
        11 November 2019 09: 43
        Quote: svp67
        Did you hear "highley like" in it?

        If it didn’t sound, then “failed”!
        1. 0
          11 November 2019 09: 57
          They are simply afraid of increasing Russian authority in the world, and they are falling below the plinth.
          1. 0
            11 November 2019 11: 57
            Really see how disgruntled British people take to the streets.
            1. 0
              11 November 2019 12: 49
              Quote: knn54
              Really see how disgruntled British people take to the streets.

              I think that if the issue with "Brexit" continues to go "not shalko-not roll", then they will come out ... How long can you hang out, that that substance is in the hole
            2. +3
              11 November 2019 13: 09

              Really see how disgruntled British people take to the streets.

              Of course we will see ... especially on the streets of London.
              smile
        2. 0
          11 November 2019 10: 09
          Only one Moscow can start the third world?
          1. +4
            11 November 2019 10: 29
            Good old demonization. Red threat, Empire of evil and all that. Only before everything was more on the forehead, but even more decent. Now - full blast, no honor.
            1. +1
              11 November 2019 15: 54
              Quote: Voyager
              Good old demonization. Red threat, Empire of evil and all that. Only before everything was more on the forehead, but even more decent. Now - full blast, no honor.

              They understood that Russia should not be reaped indefinitely. Russia will respond to aggression. Do not rub off, and answer in full! Then the world war will begin, and therefore, do not touch, do not tease, do not pull Russia!
      2. +1
        11 November 2019 09: 43
        A series of articles with Russophobic cries "bloodthirsty Russians want to start a war" continues!
        1. -1
          11 November 2019 09: 49
          Slowly but surely, the incandescence of the dehumanization of Russia and Russians is growing. Signs of the moment when they begin to kill us in the name of peace are getting closer.
          I think at this pace there are about 5 years left, no more.
        2. +2
          11 November 2019 11: 13
          -General. you pack!
          -Not for you .and for you ..
          -And we don’t need it for hell ..

          So with the war, why Russia war and even a world war ...
          In the latter, they broke the European war machine.
          War is needed in the Western financial system and economy. Correct once again shaky health and nourish someone else's .. blood ..
          History shows that England is a "war ghoul" ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +5
        11 November 2019 11: 09
        hi maybe it didn’t sound, but the whole speech could be packed in one phrase - highly likely Russia is: ... further down the list.
        They would remove their mongrel from the borders of the Russian Federation and sleep peacefully. I think we will hear similar speeches repeatedly and each time sharpened for a specific order ..
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 11: 32
          Somehow it's all in the spirit of the Cold War. All of them, peaceful lambs, the evil bear wants to break !? fool And the provocation behind the provocation themselves is held at our borders. negative
          1. 0
            11 November 2019 13: 50
            but I thought and still think that in the West they live (political elite) in the realities of the 19th century! and in the yard 21 ... everything flows and everything changes, but not human stupidity.
    2. +1
      11 November 2019 09: 34
      Did you find a window and a floor? What you will know is shouting - "The Russians are coming" ...
    3. +2
      11 November 2019 09: 35
      A-Saxons openly voice their black Wishlist. They just assign them to the Russians.
    4. +3
      11 November 2019 09: 36
      Others traditionally remembered Brexit and the desire to cover up the obvious difficulties on the way out of the EU with a “Russian” theme.


      Favorite tactics and nothing new.
    5. +2
      11 November 2019 09: 36
      And under what international law did the little shaves of the folkland be taken away or bombed Libya (to fill up the full list for half a day)?
      1. 0
        11 November 2019 10: 27
        The UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1970, imposing sanctions against Gaddafi and his associates. Later, on the night of March 18, 2011, the Security Council adopted resolution 1973 (2011), which established a no-fly zone over Libya and permitted the use of any means to protect civilians, with the exception of “the possibility of foreign occupying forces in any form on any part of Libyan territory ". After that, objects controlled by Gaddafi's forces were subjected to air strikes.
    6. +10
      11 November 2019 09: 37
      British general: Russia is able to start a third world war

      It would be better if he clearly remembered and understood that Russia could end any war !!!
    7. 0
      11 November 2019 09: 38
      A strike along the east coast has nothing to do with it; the main task of these submarines is to intercept American convoys and strike groups.
    8. +2
      11 November 2019 09: 39
      Moscow may “accidentally” start the third world war
      Here who can start 3 MVs and not by chance, is the Anglo-Saxons historically hating Russia and Russians, in whom Russophobia is a sign of good form and a sign of intelligence.
    9. -12
      11 November 2019 09: 42
      The Briton is right, we are now actually somewhat similar to the "Third Reich" in its infancy
      1. +4
        11 November 2019 09: 47
        Quote: RUSS
        The Briton is right, we are now actually somewhat similar to the "Third Reich" in its infancy

        You speak for yourself. For all of us it is not necessary.
    10. +3
      11 November 2019 09: 44
      About ,, respect ,, to international law, the general would have been silent ..
    11. +5
      11 November 2019 09: 53
      Why do we need you? To start another war ... Do not touch us, otherwise

    12. 0
      11 November 2019 09: 56
      So. Stop. what kind of dese about the election of 20 years are we talking about?) impede Trump impeachment or what's new?)))
    13. 0
      11 November 2019 09: 56
      The chief of the British defense headquarters, General Nick Carter, believes that Moscow can “accidentally” start the third world war.

      If the chief of state defense headquarters is likened to balabol
      "experts" in the media, then why expect a relaxation of tension in the confrontation.
      A military of this level should not pump up horror stories with politics, but rather, call for agreements. Only the military knows the realities of the parties.
    14. +3
      11 November 2019 10: 04
      In fact, Russia always ended the war, but did not start. Two in history with the general.
    15. +1
      11 November 2019 10: 05
      Russia can indeed polish the snout of the overbearing Anglo-Saxons.
      However, only on the basis of their own aggression.
      But no one will start a world war because of a damp island.
    16. 0
      11 November 2019 10: 08
      It’s a pity you can’t swear here
    17. +2
      11 November 2019 10: 11
      British generals are a kind of narrower specialized British scientist.
    18. 0
      11 November 2019 10: 12
      And by the way .Britain began WWII. Churchill's speech after the war. Would be silent.
      .
      1. 0
        11 November 2019 11: 10
        Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
        And by the way .Britain began WWII.

        Did you attack Poland or anyone else?
        Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
        And Churchill’s speech after the war

        And what was Churchill’s speech after the war?
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 11: 33
          Who gave Hitler money for the war. Who sent to the USSR. In a speech, Churchill called Russia the axis.
          evil.
          1. 0
            11 November 2019 14: 16
            Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
            Who gave Hitler money for the war. Who sent to the USSR

            Who! And they planted the Barbarossa plan?
            Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
            In a speech, Churchill called Russia an axis.
            evil.

            Named that right? And who cares what the former politician says there? This was a private opinion of an English citizen.
    19. 0
      11 November 2019 10: 39
      Paranoia just rolls over! Overdose! Schizoid maniacs!
    20. AML
      0
      11 November 2019 10: 41
      Quote: askort154
      The chief of the British defense headquarters, General Nick Carter, believes that Moscow can “accidentally” start the third world war.

      If the chief of state defense headquarters is likened to balabol
      "experts" in the media, then why expect a relaxation of tension in the confrontation.
      A military of this level should not pump up horror stories with politics, but rather, call for agreements. Only the military knows the realities of the parties.


      I think that this should be read in the context of the recent articles on the NATO seizure of Kaliningrad. Like they will capture, and the Russians, not thinking that they can "accidentally" start World War III, will answer.
    21. 0
      11 November 2019 10: 43
      British General: Russia is able to start World War III

      StarO, but the campaign is not fashionable. So, shamelessly shit out of habit.
    22. +1
      11 November 2019 10: 43
      Britain "leaves" the EU with a big creak. And it is Britain that can start the third world war in order not to pay huge sums of money for the exit and to recreate the former empire. Russia, on the other hand, is on guard over Britain's aspirations to again become "the ruler of the seas." And as usual, the thief shouts the loudest "stop thief".
      1. 0
        11 November 2019 11: 03
        1536 (Eugene) Today, 10:43 NEW

        Britain "leaves" the EU with a big creak ..... "But it does not leave NATO ... and plays one of the main roles in it, not yielding to the aggressiveness of the United States in its desire to bomb someone: Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya .....
    23. 0
      11 November 2019 11: 06
      Probably all the politicians of the West, accidentally crazy ...
    24. 0
      11 November 2019 11: 42
      By the whistle to the attack.? .. You don’t confuse anything, in the Soviet army I did not see whistles ..., they went to the attack by voice command, but not by the whistle ..
    25. -1
      11 November 2019 11: 55
      British General: Russia is able to start World War III

      They scare themselves.
    26. The comment was deleted.
    27. 0
      11 November 2019 12: 04
      This British ukurok apparently does not know history at all. If anyone starts, then we are definitely not. For us, as always, on schedule, the ending.
    28. 0
      11 November 2019 12: 07
      The list of states capable of even "accidentally" starting the third world war is quite extensive.
      You can even say that it is already underway, only with local conflicts and you can’t ignore it, even as a British general.
      I think that such interviews are a continuation of the same topic, when Russia is trying to stick to all armed conflicts in any way, with scotch and snot, based on the guidelines released from Washington.
      But you should not relax, in any case.
      Of course, in recent years Russia has substantially strengthened militarily in introducing new weapons and modernizing existing ones, but it is not worth it to participate in the global armed conflict.
      So far, the state, taking care of strengthening its beloved in terms of taking money from people by any means and pursuing a stupid regional policy, completely ignores the interests of the country's population, and this, in case of war, guarantees the repetition of 1941.
      I hope this is somewhere out there, inside the polar bear should be understood.
    29. 0
      11 November 2019 14: 57
      I don’t know how about starting a war, these NATO generals are such truncheons, but we can end it, it’s not to go to the grandmother.
    30. 0
      11 November 2019 15: 33
      it is necessary to drive Kuzya through the lamanche once more, but now add fuel oil to the false pipes, it will be mega-aggression, as it is sung "by my mother-in-law's house, I don’t go jokingly to her ......" time,
    31. 0
      11 November 2019 16: 01
      vice versa-able to finish it
    32. 0
      11 November 2019 20: 03
      For the 3rd Russia will "untie" the 4th, XNUMXth, and so on. And so until Russia gets tired of this business. The general was either influenced so much by autumn, or something stronger than whiskey.
    33. +1
      12 November 2019 10: 56
      "reckless behavior and disrespect for international law." And who set the rules? General Nick Carter, the chief of defense of Great Britain, has probably forgotten that the times of Queen Victoria and the empire over which the sun does not "set" have long sunk into summer and are covered with mold.
    34. The comment was deleted.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"