Rouhani announces discovery of new oil field with huge reserves in Iran

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani made a statement that did not go unnoticed by the main producers and exporters of oil. While on a visit to the city of Yazd, Rouhani announced the discovery of the country's largest oil field, the existence of which was not previously reported.


Rouhani announces discovery of new oil field with huge reserves in Iran


The political leader of Iran noted that the discovered field is located in the province of Khuzestan - in the southern part of the country.

According to Hassan Rouhani, the field was discovered by specialists from the National Iranian Oil Company and the research team of the country's oil ministry.

Hassan Rouhani:

The proven oil reserves in this field are huge. They amount to at least 53 billion barrels of oil.

The Iranian President emphasized that this is the so-called easily-produced oil. It is noted that the depth of "black gold" does not exceed 80 m. The total area of ​​the deposit in Khuzestan is about 2,4 thousand square meters. km

Thus, the explored oil reserves in Iran are now estimated at approximately 150 billion barrels. Despite the embargo by a number of Western countries on the purchase of Iranian oil, Tehran is developing a program to develop the oil sector until 2025. The approximate cost of this project is 500 million dollars. In addition to China, Iranian oil continues to be actively purchased by individual European countries.
Photos used:
http://en.nioc.ir (Национальная иранская нефтяная компания)
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 20 New
    • 14
    • 6
    +8
    Such a statement could cause a collapse in oil prices. Shale oil will become unprofitable for production, Iranians will strengthen their position in the region. ..
    1. cniza 10 November 2019 14: 27 New
      • 12
      • 1
      +11
      Well, the collapse may not cause, but some will scratch their turnips.
      1. Sky strike fighter 10 November 2019 14: 34 New
        • 10
        • 10
        0
        And it’s for sure that someone will decide to attack Iran. Iran is digging a grave for itself. By God. Are they crazy there or they think that the USA is already like a global force? And what kind of collapse should it be mined and made so that it can to buy, but did not refuse to buy Iranian oil as now everyone refuses.
      2. TermNachTer 10 November 2019 15: 12 New
        • 5
        • 8
        -3
        Well, it’s not profitable even now. Its threshold, somewhere between 80 and 90, is now keeping prices lower.
        1. cniza 10 November 2019 15: 43 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          It depends on where and whom, for shale in the USA, yes.
          1. TermNachTer 10 November 2019 16: 14 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Well, they and Canada are the main "engines" of shale oil, the rest are waiting. Regarding the collapse in prices - a big question. If the deposit was anywhere. and not in Iran - perhaps. But while Iran is under sanctions, it is unlikely.
        2. Nenie Lynn 10 November 2019 17: 06 New
          • 3
          • 11
          -8
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Well, it’s not profitable even now. Its threshold, somewhere between 80 and 90, is now keeping prices lower.

          Now the cost of production is about 20 bucks, pipelines to ports have been laid and infrastructure has been improved. What do you think the detonation of the refinery did not affect the price at all? States have provided for themselves and enter the global market.
          1. TermNachTer 10 November 2019 21: 39 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            20 bucks is in the Persian Gulf. In other countries it will be more expensive.
      3. Piramidon 10 November 2019 15: 54 New
        • 22
        • 4
        +18
        Quote: cniza
        Well, the collapse may not cause, but some will scratch their turnips.

        Yankees now all feathers in his bird
        pulled out of the tail.
        1. cniza 10 November 2019 15: 57 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          In full face, Bush Jr. recalls ...
      4. Lelek 10 November 2019 18: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        Well, the collapse may not cause, but some will scratch their turnips.

        hi
        Some do not turnips and sweaty little hands will begin to rub. IMHO, this will push the United States, the Saudis and the Emirates to intensify provocations against Iran, and possibly military operations.
      5. Nyrobsky 10 November 2019 21: 02 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Thrifty
        Such a statement could cause a collapse in oil prices. Shale oil will become unprofitable for production, Iranians will strengthen their position in the region. ..

        Quote: cniza
        Well, the collapse may not cause, but some will scratch their turnips.

        Now the mattresses will slap themselves on the forehead and remember that at one time the daughter of former US Secretary of State John Kerry married the son of the Iranian foreign minister, and they say, “Yooo, MAAAEOO! Well, how can that be ?! fellow We are almost relatives! " love Who remembers the old, that eye is out! Half yours, half ours and down with all the sanctions and embargoes. " yes
        P / S - Here almost the other day, the Saudis decided to allow privatization of their oil industry. There is an opinion that this was done for the reason that the declared volumes of explored oil reserves in the SA do not correspond much to the real volumes and in the foreseeable future will be exhausted to a level that will remove the CA from the leading position. And then Iran found a deposit on time, and the volume is quite appetizing. what
    2. Nikolay Ivanov_5 10 November 2019 14: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      But you can only rejoice at the Iranians for how lucky they are.
      1. ltc35 10 November 2019 16: 18 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Lucky in what? That now the hegemon with even greater zeal will begin to prove to the world about the new threat of terrorism? It will be so. Would download quietly ...
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 10 November 2019 16: 18 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Who else believes in American lies?
          1. ltc35 10 November 2019 16: 29 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Taki have not believed for a long time. But everything goes like this - it’s more profitable to pretend that you believe. This is like with Iraq. They will find chemical weapons, a nuclear bomb in London or they will open a network of martyrs who are preparing an assassination attempt on the president wassat
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 10 November 2019 16: 34 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Now it will be difficult for Americans to deceive countries other than those that are members of NATO or controlled by pro-American puppet authorities.
              1. ltc35 10 November 2019 16: 35 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Ah, tricking me is not difficult ... laughing
              2. Chaldon48 10 November 2019 23: 33 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                The USA does not deceive its vassals, somewhere they grossly press on them to agree, and sometimes, though less and less, they simply order.
            2. Leonard Kabachkov_2 11 November 2019 15: 57 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              In London, by the way, they found a Hezbollah warehouse with several thousand bags of potassium nitrate
    3. svp67 10 November 2019 15: 13 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: Thrifty
      Such a statement could cause a collapse in oil prices. Shale oil will become unprofitable for production, Iranians will strengthen their position in the region. ..

      No, Iranian oil is banned and now they can speak and produce anything, but so far they can’t put strong pressure on world prices
      Rouhani announces discovery of new oil field with huge reserves in Iran

      Very careless saying
      1. Greenwood 10 November 2019 15: 24 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: svp67
        Very careless saying
        Overseas "friends" will not go to Iran with democracy. Iran, like the DPRK, is too dangerous an adversary whose military potential is not fully understood. There is too much risk of attacking this country.
      2. Tank jacket 10 November 2019 17: 39 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        I like this. So the Iranians will have something to pay for deliveries of Russian air defense systems, which means that not only air defense can be delivered, but tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, grenade launchers, small arms, etc.
    4. Tank jacket 10 November 2019 17: 24 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Shale oil is stolen Syrian oil, so there will be no collapse. Very happy for the Iranians. Black gold will help them develop a missile program. Iran's missiles will fly further, more precisely and faster ...
  2. Operator 10 November 2019 14: 21 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The world's annual oil consumption is 30 billion barrels.
    1. rich 10 November 2019 14: 48 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      The proven oil reserves in this field are huge. They amount to at least 53 billion barrels of oil.

      This is a plus for Iran,
      “minus, this region is Iran’s hotbed of separatism. During the Iran-Iraq war, local Arab separatists maintained ties with the regime of Saddam Hussein. The government of the so-called“ free Khuzestan ”settled in Holland
      1. Operator 10 November 2019 15: 57 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        In which case, the Persians will cut / deport the Khuzestan Arabs and close the question.
  3. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 14: 22 New
    • 13
    • 32
    -19
    I translate from the Ayatollah language to the generally accepted one: “There are a lot of oil, honest Islamist. Well, buy at least somebody” belay
    1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 32 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Zeyevzeev, the Persians have been living under sanctions for a very long time, your state also once was under an embargo, so your joke is unsuccessful. ..
      1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 14: 33 New
        • 5
        • 25
        -20
        I will not sympathize with the regime that wants to kill me.
        1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 40 New
          • 15
          • 3
          +12
          Zeevzeev, and you want to feed them with matzo free? Do you know such a truth “if you want to use your tongue, don’t give free rein to your hands”? It’s not reproachfully said, your state speaks a lot of language, and, figuratively speaking, a bomb will give hands to the weak like Syria and Lebanon. ..
          1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 14: 46 New
            • 4
            • 24
            -20
            We do not send our soldiers to launch rockets on Yazd, we do not sponsor or arm the organization for the liberation of Al-Ahvar. On our streets they do not shout "Death to Iran," and our leaders do not yell from the stands "We will destroy Iran." Moreover, Israel and the Jews have nothing against Iran and the Persians, after all, during the time of the Shah, we had excellent cooperation with them. So far, the Islamists have not come to power.
            1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 52 New
              • 15
              • 2
              +13
              Zeyevzeev, you simply bomb without shouts and calls from someone else’s airspace wherever you want and whom you want. ..or the Syrians and Lebanese themselves will bomb your bombs and missiles? ??
              1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 15: 01 New
                • 5
                • 18
                -13
                Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. We are talking about the Iranian regime, which is fighting against Israel. Should I regret that Ayatollah Khamenai has no money to build a nuclear bomb that he wants to drop on my house? Walla?
                1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 15: 37 New
                  • 5
                  • 3
                  +2
                  Zeyevzeev, if the Persians were eager to get atomic weapons urgently, they, like the Saudis, could have paid for its creation by the same Pakistanis, for example. ... atomic weapons today are partly a guarantee that your country will not be attacked with impunity. ... and you don’t need a lot of money to buy or create atomic weapons. If the Persians would definitely want to destroy you, they would have had such a weapon for a long time. ... walla? ????
                  1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 15: 46 New
                    • 0
                    • 7
                    -7
                    The attempt to create nuclear weapons is now a guarantee of sanctions and a collapse of the economy. Especially if this is done by a country that has openly declared other countries to be its enemies.
                    1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 15: 52 New
                      • 8
                      • 2
                      +6
                      Zeevzeev, and that the Persians are not under sanctions? But how did your Israel get atomic weapons? You created it South Africans, is that right? And how long did the Israelites live under sanctions after that? They didn’t live at all, right, because the United States actively entered for you, is that right? Why then are the Iranians worse than you?
                      1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 16: 44 New
                        • 1
                        • 7
                        -6
                        Israel has no nuclear weapons. Officially. And everyone knows very well that if it were, then Israel would use it only in case of real danger to the Jewish state. There is nothing to impose sanctions on Israel. Our state does not arrange gas attacks, massacres of civilians and does not touch the one who does not threaten us. The only "sanctions" that were imposed on Israel were the US arms embargo in 1948 and the ban on arms sales to Israel from France in 1968.
                      2. Thrifty 10 November 2019 17: 11 New
                        • 7
                        • 2
                        +5
                        Zeyevzeev, the fact that you can get out of any accusation against your Israel does not mean that your state is peaceful and harmless. This means only one thing - you are good at juggling the facts, and bring down all the problems from a sore head to a healthy one. Your lack of atomic weapons does not officially mean that you have not considered options for its reconciliation. .. while you have common sense, you understand that radiation may not be the worst evil that you inadvertently can get yourself. ..
                      3. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 17: 26 New
                        • 1
                        • 3
                        -2
                        A simple question is how many Jews are in the "peace-loving" Arab countries. And how many Arabs are in Israel?
                      4. Thrifty 10 November 2019 18: 00 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Zeyevzeev, and it’s not the number of Jews in a particular country, it’s your foreign policy. For you, there is no state that is not part of your circle of interests; you, just like the United States, want to dominate the world. If in any country in the world there are no your countrymen, you immediately make every effort to make them appear in this country. .... live wherever you want, but stop the habit of commanding the whole world. Humanity owes you nothing.
                      5. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 18: 10 New
                        • 1
                        • 3
                        -2
                        It is strange how Indonesia or Bolivia are not in Israel’s area of ​​interest. Even Slovakia and Andorra are not. Tunisia, Chad, Zimbabwe ... Do you even read what you write.
                      6. Thrifty 10 November 2019 18: 28 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Zeyevzeev, this is unofficially so, or so far so. .it is any of these countries, for example, to buy your weapon, everything will change dramatically and instantly. ..so think what you write. ...
      2. Incvizitor 10 November 2019 22: 07 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Let’s not equal Iran, which is not bombing anyone, and the Israeli regime, which is constantly aggression.
      3. Demon_is_ada 11 November 2019 01: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So you want to say that Iranian soldiers are fighting with your country? Present at least one prisoner as evidence to the world community? No? Ahhh, you have it, but you don’t show it ... everything is clear ... yeah ...
        And with proxy handles, so this is a progressive global trend, what kind of discontent can there be? Your government itself has officially recognized aid to the Kurdish separatists ... Maybe you lack democracy there? And Iran is trying to bring it to you, to give you freedom at last ...
  • asv363 10 November 2019 16: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Zeev Zeev
    I will not sympathize with the regime that wants to kill me.

    Iran does not recognize Israel’s right to exist as a state, but Iran has no questions about Jews as a nation, which is enshrined in the constitution. One thing is slogans from the stands, another thing. What losses do you have in Israel among civilians from Iranian attacks this year?

    And so as not to get up twice. Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa banning nuclear weapons, as well as work on creating nuclear weapons, the use of nuclear weapons, etc. From a technical point of view, at the moment, Iran is far from creating nuclear weapons, and, moreover, they are not in a hurry.
    1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 16: 49 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Yeah, there are no questions for the Jews. Therefore, immigration of Jews from Iran to Israel is prohibited. That is why the Iranian proxies shout "Death to America, death to Israel, curse of the Jews, victory for Islam." That is why 50 Jews remained in Syria allied with Iran.
      But fatwas are such a thing ... The lie told by a Muslim to a non-Muslim for the sake of jihad is not a lie.
      1. asv363 10 November 2019 17: 05 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Again. If the Islamic Republic of Iran does not recognize the existence of Israel, how can there be direct immigration from Iran to Israel? And how many times has Iran participated in wars against Israel, can you tell me?
        1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 17: 27 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Missiles launched by the IRGC fell in Israel this year.
          1. asv363 10 November 2019 17: 58 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Were there any victims?
            1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 18: 06 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Were not. "Iron Dome" shot down. But did you have to wait until there are victims?
              1. asv363 10 November 2019 18: 26 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Of course not. Do not compare with the Donbass, you dramatize the situation too much.
                1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 21: 27 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  I advise you not to recall the Donbass. There's a civil war there, right?
      2. Thrifty 10 November 2019 17: 15 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Zeyevzeev, what do the Israelis shout in response to - Long live Iran and its Ayatollah? You, too, in response, probably not shouting eulogies to the Persians. ..
        1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 17: 22 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          But in Israel they’re not shouting anything. We have neither state nor private demonstrations against Iran and the Persian people.
          1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 17: 26 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Zeyevzeev, you don’t need to shout, because you have recorded Iran as your enemy, this mantra helps you to get out of any situation that is unpleasant for you. ...
            1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 17: 28 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              No. This ayatollah regime has recorded us as its enemy. In 1979.
              1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 18: 04 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Zeyevzeev, if so, then there were reasons. .. probably helped the anti-people Shah regime. ..and since 1979, the Persians have not destroyed you precisely because they do not want it. Call the enemy, and firmly decide to destroy two huge differences.
                1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 18: 08 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Come on. Not destroyed, because they can’t.
                2. Thrifty 10 November 2019 18: 13 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Zeyevzeev, they did not destroy, because they do not need it. ..persons have fought over their history, want to live peacefully, so leave them alone with your usa. ..
                3. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 21: 29 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Hmm. That is, the number of ksirovites who died in Syria from Iran "fought" for someone is a secret ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • Rostislav Prokopenko 10 November 2019 18: 12 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Zeev Zeev
    A lie told by a Muslim to a non-Muslim for the sake of jihad is not a lie.

    I just heard something like that about gentiles and non-gentiles ...
    1. Zeev Zeev 10 November 2019 21: 29 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      I heard a jingle ...
  • yustas 10 November 2019 23: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I’m afraid you won’t be surprised, but they’re screaming not only in Iran, but also in many countries, I think that your government should think about it
  • Ptrz 10 November 2019 15: 10 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Is Iranian oil not sanctioned, or am I mistaken?
    1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 15: 39 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Money doesn't smell. ... cheap oil too. ... So sanctions are nothing when you want to earn. ..
  • abrakadabre 10 November 2019 14: 25 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Iran needs to build refineries according to the most modern projects. And to trade oil redistribution products.
  • knn54 10 November 2019 14: 32 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    It is necessary to help master.
  • Atlant-1164 10 November 2019 14: 35 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    "Rouhani announced the discovery in Iran of a new oil field with huge reserves"

    sounds like an invitation to the West to "democratize" Iran.
    1. Yura 10 November 2019 15: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Atlant-1164
      sounds like an invitation to the West to "democratize" Iran

      Or as a warning, bring down the price of oil. Effects?
      1. Brturin 10 November 2019 15: 24 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Jura
        Or as a warning, bring down the price of oil. Effects?

        To bring down prices is somehow ... And today's prices are already a problem for shale workers in the states - since the beginning of the year the number of rigs has decreased by almost 20%, not fatally, but in the long run ... Trump will benefit from cheap oil before the election - low prices at gas stations, which pleases voters, but this is bad for shale workers .... This is a statement, maybe for the states (your oil will be expensive to produce and will run out, but we have a lot with cheap production), or it can be measured with the Saudis ...
        1. Yura 10 November 2019 15: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: BrTurin
          And today's prices are already a problem for shale workers in the states - since the beginning of the year, the number of rigs has decreased by almost 20%, not fatally, but for the future.

          good Well understood, one of the probable and possible messages.
        2. Nenie Lynn 10 November 2019 17: 11 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          Quote: BrTurin
          today's prices are already a problem for shale workers in the states - since the beginning of the year, the number of rigs has decreased by almost 20%, not fatally, but in the long term ... Trump is prone to cheap oil before the election - low gas station prices, which pleases voters

          your information is already rotten 10 years ago laughing you this, manuals often change.
          1. Brturin 10 November 2019 20: 41 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Do not trust the data for 10 months of this year, the oil service company Baker Hughes. Give your version, and then everyone writes "However, before the shale industry, it did not bother them, they just canned the equipment until better times. But now everything is different, World Oil notes. Patterson-UTI Energy Inc. and RPC Inc. are decommissioning trucks, pumping units and other equipment used to destroy shale rock. It is taken apart for parts or sold for scrap. " No one has yet said that oil shale is caput, but low prices create problems, and this despite the fact that, as the US sanctions calculated, one third of the world's oil reserves and one fifth of production - Iran, Venezuela and Russia ....
  • Cut Samshitov 10 November 2019 14: 36 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    The United States can forgive everything except oil uncontrolled for itself. We look forward to another scream about the suffering Iranian homosexuals .... and Afro-Iranians!
    1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 44 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Saw cut Samshitov-the United States will try to play more actively on the differences between the countries of the region so that they can weaken Iran with their hands as much as possible, right up to the development of events according to the ukroin variant.
      1. Cut Samshitov 10 November 2019 14: 49 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Thrifty
        Saw cut Samshitov-the United States will try to play more actively on the differences between the countries of the region so that they can weaken Iran with their hands as much as possible, right up to the development of events according to the ukroin variant.

        Well, why "try"? The USA always acts according to the ancient Roman formula - “divide and conquer”. In Ukraine, including.
    2. Good_Anonymous 10 November 2019 18: 36 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Cut Samshitov
      The United States can forgive everything except oil uncontrolled for itself.


      You have oil - some kind of fetish. Calm down, there’s a lot of oil in the world. And even oil that is not under the control of the United States is also a lot.
  • askort154 10 November 2019 14: 42 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Zeev Zeev .....I will not sympathize with the regime that wants to kill me.

    What is he for you? crying And here I am, not afraid.!
    1. Thrifty 10 November 2019 14: 46 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Persians do not want to be at home in third roles. ..and Israel together with the usa want to dominate the region ...
  • opuonmed 10 November 2019 14: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    soon democracy with its bombs will come to them))))))
  • NF68 10 November 2019 14: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The more oil in any country, the less democracy there is in it. The United States has another reason to tighten sanctions against Iran.
  • anjey 10 November 2019 15: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Rouhani decided to push their geopolitical enemies in this way, they will also salivate and throw even more forces and means into the fight against Iran, so there are minuses in this statement ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • Nycomed 10 November 2019 15: 30 New
    • 0
    • 9
    -9
    One said nonsense, and the others clapped their hands. fool negative
  • Yaro Polk 10 November 2019 15: 51 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Trump already tweeted there, not that this is an American oil field that accidentally fell into Iran? laughing
  • Aleks2000 10 November 2019 16: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everyone is already used to the fact that Iran always says something loud ...
    Because there will be nothing, IMHO ...
  • evgen1221 10 November 2019 17: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It would be silent, maybe the American oil industry workers in uniform will start to hurt that he should leave))) and so on and so
  • Gennady Fomkin 10 November 2019 18: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t believe that until today they didn’t know about such a field with such reserves, and even at a depth of only 80 meters. laughing laughing
    1. NKT
      NKT 10 November 2019 19: 08 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Just such a depth does not raise doubts, since there are analogues: the region of Baku and Grozny, Udmurtia, Bashkiria, Mexico, the island of Trinidad, etc. True, in most cases it is oxidized oil.
  • Gennady Fomkin 10 November 2019 18: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/service/7/اقتصادی Вот ссылка на оригинальную статью. Если вы понимаете фарси - переведите.
  • Igorpl 10 November 2019 18: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They would be more careful with such statements.
  • forester1971 10 November 2019 21: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    After such a statement by Iran, the hawks from the United States will even more strongly condemn the absence of any democracy and the need to deliver it to Iran using Tamogavk peaceful missiles.
  • cat Rusich 10 November 2019 22: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "... Discovered a" new "black gold" deposit at a depth of 80m ... ". My opinion: the land of Persia was explored "along and across" several times during the Shah. Now they are going to “squeeze” “black gold” even out of stone (they recently boasted to V. Putin). There is no "new" easy-to-get oil left, maybe they extended a pipe from Iraq and "discovered" an oil "source" ...