Military Review

The submarine "Prince Vladimir" conducted underwater firing in the White Sea

40
The latest Russian nuclear submarine K-549, Prince Vladimir, undergoing state tests, conducted test firing, hitting a torpedo underwater target in the White Sea. This was reported by the press service of the North fleet Russia.


The submarine "Prince Vladimir" conducted underwater firing in the White Sea


According to the report, the Prince Vladimir nuclear submarine fired at an underwater target at a test site of the Ministry of Defense in the White Sea as part of state tests. Before that, the submarine hit a surface target with a torpedo and checked its main weaponhaving made a test launch of the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile at the Kamchatka training ground.

The shooting was carried out by a torpedo without a warhead on an underwater target

- said in a statement.

As previously reported by the Ministry of Defense, the nuclear submarine Prince Vladimir is undergoing state tests, including tests of various types of weapons. The submarine missile cruiser will enter its first official combat duty before the end of this year.

Strategic nuclear project "Prince Vladimir" of the modified 955A Borey-A project was laid down at Sevmash in Severodvinsk on 30 on July 2012 of the year, and the conclusion from the workshop took place on November 17 of 2017 of the year. The Borey-A project is notable for less noise, more advanced systems for maneuvering and keeping at depth, as well as weapon control.

At present, four more serial ARPXNs of this 955 project are being built at Sevmash: Prince Oleg (officially laid on July 27 2014), Generalissimus Suvorov (laid on December 26 2014 of the year), Emperor Alexander III (laid on December 18 2015) year) and "Prince Pozharsky" (founded December 23 2016 of the year).

Currently, the Navy is serving three nuclear missile submarines of the 955 (Borey) project of the 4 generation — the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh.
40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. freejack
    freejack 9 November 2019 16: 31
    +15
    submarine missile cruiser will enter before the end of this year

    Pleases!) And let you, divers, the number of ascent will always be equal to the number of dives!)) hi
    1. Harry.km
      Harry.km 10 November 2019 00: 02
      0
      Quote: freejack

      Pleases!)

      A great New Year gift can work!
      1. Grits
        Grits 10 November 2019 02: 51
        -2
        Quote: Harry.km
        A great New Year gift can work!

        It's no secret that the factory workers always rent a new or refurbished boat just for the New Year. And the signing most often takes place, as they say at the "Under the Christmas tree" plant. Because if the act is signed on January 1, then it will officially be not the planned year of the transfer - 2019, but 2020. With all the penalties that come with the industry and the absence of bonuses for the plant workers.
  2. ancestors from Don
    ancestors from Don 9 November 2019 16: 31
    +8
    Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth.
    1. Sergey39
      Sergey39 9 November 2019 16: 49
      0
      They now just have a question, what to do with aircraft carriers, repair or write off. Let them think.
    2. Ros 56
      Ros 56 9 November 2019 17: 24
      +2
      And to hell with us, foreign territories, we can’t really decide on our own. request
    3. Dude
      Dude 9 November 2019 17: 28
      0
      Quote: Ancestors from the Don
      Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth.

      Only now, the SSBN, about which the news, is geared towards knocking out teeth larger than an aircraft carrier wink
      To use pr. 955A against AUG is to thresh not even from a cannon at sparrows, but from "Tornado" at caterpillars of cabbage butterflies)))
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 9 November 2019 20: 12
        +4
        Quote: Dude
        To use pr. 955A against AUG is to thresh not even from a cannon at sparrows, but from "Tornado" at caterpillars of cabbage butterflies)))

        And on the other hand, given the RPKSN ammunition fellow , one of the "pencils" can be sent to the group target - they will not have time to scatter. It seems that in special cases the use of nuclear ballistic missiles for tactical purposes is permissible. Something like this. request
        1. Dude
          Dude 9 November 2019 20: 33
          +5
          one of the "pencils" can also be sent to the group goal - they will not have time to scatter.
          If possible targeting and the availability of need - Varum and niht? yes
          It seems that in special cases the use of nuclear weapons for tactical purposes is permissible. Something like this. request
          Undoubtedly. If the need to hammer a nail with a microscope is a matter of life and death - it is necessary to hammer. Especially if there are plenty of microscopes. Neither the hammer nor the microscope are needed for the dead. yes
          1. Old Michael
            Old Michael 9 November 2019 23: 26
            0
            If the need to hammer a nail with a microscope is a matter of life and death - it is necessary to hammer.

            Technically, you can pervert and use strategic nuclear forces to solve a tactical task. But the CBU system is not sharpened for this. Perversion will come out excessively expensive in every sense.
            1. Dude
              Dude 10 November 2019 00: 04
              +2
              Technically, you can be perverted <...> But the CBU system is not tailored for this
              Which, in fact, I had in mind. Purely speculative. Of course, to solve tactical problems, it is preferable to use appropriate means hi
          2. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 10 November 2019 01: 04
            +2
            Yes, do not even hammer that nail. After all, it is possible to tighten a screw 10x200mm neatly in the crotch (exactly between the causal places). With a big step. On wood. For lenn oo and with special cynicism.
            For an AUG, the detonation of a single charge of 100 kt at an altitude of 30-50 m within the order is where it will be enough for the AUG to become at least sky-ready for the next month. No? And this is just one (read on the lips - ONE Gauge)
            Well, for fidelity there will be more than one in the salvo - about five. And volleys - at least a couple, or even more.
            Five through 100 will break through - wonderful! Break through one - great! And who exactly launches it, the nuclear cruiser, Varshavyanka or a bomber - it does not matter.
    4. Grits
      Grits 10 November 2019 02: 55
      +1
      Quote: ancestors from the Don
      Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth

      Borea is not intended to knock out teeth. And do not even smash the skull. And immediately turn the carcass into minced meat. Well, or in extreme cases - to ferment into a thin pancake with one hit.
  3. Armata T-14
    Armata T-14 9 November 2019 16: 44
    -6
    I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington
    1. Ros 56
      Ros 56 9 November 2019 17: 26
      +7
      So what's the matter, a bunch of scrap metal, a file in your hands and go for it, sir. lol
      1. AVA77
        AVA77 9 November 2019 17: 38
        +4
        Better get a loan! laughing (Bank scene) What are you going to spend money on?
        On the acquisition of the Borei-K submarine with zircons! wassat Ahh ... what do you have as a guarantee of
        property? Well ..... then if I give it back to the aircraft carriers, well, when I drown it, so to speak. wink
    2. Dude
      Dude 9 November 2019 17: 30
      +5
      Quote: Armata T-14
      I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

      And can a sacramental question - what for??? belay
      1. Armata T-14
        Armata T-14 9 November 2019 22: 58
        -2
        To be able to strike at the decision center within minutes
        1. Dude
          Dude 9 November 2019 23: 53
          +1
          Quote: Armata T-14
          To be able to strike at the decision center within minutes

          I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington
          All information, in open sources, states that Zircon - anti-ship rocket, besides with a range 350 ... 600 km.
          So I thought: I wonder why you need 200 anti-ship missiles (200 anti-ship missiles on one nuclear submarine are unscientific fiction, of course, oh well) that can hit a surface target located at a distance of 400 to 1600 km from the US coast? request lol And besides, placed, for some reason, not on MAPL, And SSBN? feel
          I think that the Americans' "decision-making center" is located somewhere else. request feel
    3. Grits
      Grits 10 November 2019 03: 03
      +1
      Quote: Armata T-14
      I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

      For these purposes, Antaeus ("Batons") are better suited. Boreas just will not cope with the task under the conditions that you drew. It is geared specifically for ballistic missiles. Which are 1000 km. they cannot shoot.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 9 November 2019 17: 32
    +5
    And KUZMA MININ when / if there will be? After all, a noticeable, heroic FIGURE in the history of the preservation of OUR STATE!
    There was such a cruiser in the Imperial Navy! Is it really not worth capturing the name of an outstanding person in a modern Russian fleet by naming a warship.
    1. ABM
      ABM 9 November 2019 17: 48
      0
      "Vladimir Monomakh" was
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 9 November 2019 18: 18
        +3
        Quote: ABM
        "Vladimir Monomakh" was

        Princely, upper class! Minin merchants, consider a commoner .....
        1. ABM
          ABM 9 November 2019 19: 09
          +1
          The semi-armored frigate Minin was also
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 9 November 2019 21: 04
            0
            Quote: ABM
            The semi-armored frigate Minin was also

            Anything happened .... worked on the KIROV cruiser .... then on its completion, only he was then called ANDROPOV .... Brezhnev, Chernenko, Gorbachev and Yeltsin successfully passed by, and now this is our one and only PETER THE GREAT!
        2. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 10 November 2019 01: 11
          0
          Let there be Minin! We have a hundred more in history - there is only another glorious governor. This does not include princes. And the noble and merchant classes, and even just from the people. It would be something to call - there are names, believe me!
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 10 November 2019 07: 28
            0
            Quote: Vlad.by
            It would be something to call - there are names, believe me

            Exactly, there would be what to call.
    2. 1976AG
      1976AG 9 November 2019 18: 10
      +2
      Quote: rocket757
      And KUZMA MININ when / if there will be? After all, a noticeable, heroic FIGURE in the history of the preservation of OUR STATE!
      There was such a cruiser in the Imperial Navy! Is it really not worth capturing the name of an outstanding person in a modern Russian fleet by naming a warship.

      Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy, and now ... just to give
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 9 November 2019 18: 24
        +2
        The names gave DIFFERENT! There were not enough outstanding naval / nautical names for everything.
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 9 November 2019 19: 42
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          The names gave DIFFERENT! There were not enough outstanding naval / nautical names for everything.

          Kings and princes are always more important than heroes ..
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 9 November 2019 20: 56
            0
            At different times, preferences are also different.
      2. Sergey Valov
        Sergey Valov 9 November 2019 19: 39
        +3
        "Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy" -
        Suvorov, Borodino, Tsesarevich, Oleg, Boyarin, Novik, Empress Maria, Dzhigit ... Continue?
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 9 November 2019 19: 41
          0
          You started in tsarist times, as you however ..)
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          "Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy" -
          Suvorov, Borodino, Tsesarevich, Oleg, Boyarin, Novik, Empress Maria, Dzhigit ... Continue?
          1. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 9 November 2019 20: 16
            +3
            Quote: 1976AG
            from the tsarist times began

            Duc, your "earlier" is, however, a loose concept. yes
        2. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 9 November 2019 20: 15
          +5
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          Continue?

          "Peresvet", "Oslyabya", "Don't touch me!", "Three glasses" and yes, "Goto Predistinatsiya". laughing
  5. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 9 November 2019 18: 54
    +2
    good news, seven feet under the keel
  6. bald
    bald 9 November 2019 19: 08
    +2
    This is the best news
  7. Eroma
    Eroma 9 November 2019 22: 59
    -3
    Just curious, strategists after a salvo of missiles, how can a regular apl be able to fight?
    It is clear that after a volley it’s kind of like fighting, it’s not why, there’s a question of pure survival, but suddenly the war will continue after the thermonuclear apocalypse, are these submarines capable of anything else? what
  8. Resistance
    Resistance 10 November 2019 11: 44
    0
    Tests are ship. Testing weapons is a different topic, a different time and a different place. So, they hit, did not hit, this is for the romantics of the sea. Ammunition left - offset.
  9. Old26
    Old26 10 November 2019 12: 50
    -3
    Quote: Vlad.by
    Yes, do not even hammer that nail. After all, it is possible to tighten a screw 10x200mm neatly in the crotch (exactly between the causal places). With a big step. On wood. For lenn oo and with special cynicism.
    For an AUG, the detonation of a single charge of 100 kt at an altitude of 30-50 m within the order is where it will be enough for the AUG to become at least sky-ready for the next month. No? And this is just one (read on the lips - ONE Gauge)
    Well, for fidelity there will be more than one in the salvo - about five. And volleys - at least a couple, or even more.
    Five through 100 will break through - wonderful! Break through one - great! And who exactly launches it, the nuclear cruiser, Varshavyanka or a bomber - it does not matter.

    The order is most often ships located tens of kilometers around the aircraft carrier. Shooting the intercontinental at AUG - well, very creative. But also very stupid. There are no guarantees that this 100-ct charge will fall into the order at all. Even during the Soviet era, when we created such an anti-ship missile, the power of its heads was about 1,5 MT. And you want to get by with a hundred.

    Well, "Caliber" - oh yes, this is a supervunderwaffe. True, with a range of about 400-500 km and subsonic speed. But he will definitely break through to the AUG. Can't help but break through. He is "CALIBER" !!!!

    Quote: Armata T-14
    I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

    Want is not harmful. Until "Borea-K" so far in general, as before Beijing, sorry "cancer". Voice acting does not mean that someone will build them.
    You will probably have microscopic zircons, since there will be a couple of hundred. True, when "Zircon" is tested from a ship or a boat at all, it remains a virtual weapon ...