The submarine "Prince Vladimir" conducted underwater firing in the White Sea

The latest Russian nuclear submarine K-549, Prince Vladimir, undergoing state tests, conducted test firing, hitting a torpedo underwater target in the White Sea. This was reported by the press service of the North fleet Russia.

According to the report, the Prince Vladimir nuclear submarine fired at an underwater target at a test site of the Ministry of Defense in the White Sea as part of state tests. Before that, the submarine hit a surface target with a torpedo and checked its main weaponhaving made a test launch of the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile at the Kamchatka training ground.

The shooting was carried out by a torpedo without a warhead on an underwater target

- said in a statement.

As previously reported by the Ministry of Defense, the nuclear submarine Prince Vladimir is undergoing state tests, including tests of various types of weapons. The submarine missile cruiser will enter its first official combat duty before the end of this year.

Strategic nuclear project "Prince Vladimir" of the modified 955A Borey-A project was laid down at Sevmash in Severodvinsk on 30 on July 2012 of the year, and the conclusion from the workshop took place on November 17 of 2017 of the year. The Borey-A project is notable for less noise, more advanced systems for maneuvering and keeping at depth, as well as weapon control.

At present, four more serial ARPXNs of this 955 project are being built at Sevmash: Prince Oleg (officially laid on July 27 2014), Generalissimus Suvorov (laid on December 26 2014 of the year), Emperor Alexander III (laid on December 18 2015) year) and "Prince Pozharsky" (founded December 23 2016 of the year).

Currently, the Navy is serving three nuclear missile submarines of the 955 (Borey) project of the 4 generation — the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh.

Comments

[freejack]

submarine missile cruiser will enter before the end of this year

Pleases!) And let you, divers, the number of ascent will always be equal to the number of dives!))

[Harry.km]

Quote: freejack

Pleases!)

A great New Year gift can work!

[Grits]

Quote: Harry.km

A great New Year gift can work!

It's no secret that the factory workers always rent a new or refurbished boat just for the New Year. And the signing most often takes place, as they say at the "Under the Christmas tree" plant. Because if the act is signed on January 1, then it will officially be not the planned year of the transfer - 2019, but 2020. With all the penalties that come with the industry and the absence of bonuses for the plant workers.

[ancestors from Don]

Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth.

[Sergey39]

They now just have a question, what to do with aircraft carriers, repair or write off. Let them think.

[Ros 56]

And to hell with us, foreign territories, we can’t really decide on our own.

[Dude]

Quote: Ancestors from the Don

Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth.

Only now, the SSBN, about which the news, is geared towards knocking out teeth larger than an aircraft carrier
To use pr. 955A against AUG is to thresh not even from a cannon at sparrows, but from "Tornado" at caterpillars of cabbage butterflies)))

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Dude

To use pr. 955A against AUG is to thresh not even from a cannon at sparrows, but from "Tornado" at caterpillars of cabbage butterflies)))

And on the other hand, given the RPKSN ammunition , one of the "pencils" can be sent to the group target - they will not have time to scatter. It seems that in special cases the use of nuclear ballistic missiles for tactical purposes is permissible. Something like this.

[Dude]

one of the "pencils" can also be sent to the group goal - they will not have time to scatter.

If possible targeting and the availability of need - Varum and niht?

It seems that in special cases the use of nuclear weapons for tactical purposes is permissible. Something like this. request

Undoubtedly. If the need to hammer a nail with a microscope is a matter of life and death - it is necessary to hammer. Especially if there are plenty of microscopes. Neither the hammer nor the microscope are needed for the dead.

[Old Michael]

If the need to hammer a nail with a microscope is a matter of life and death - it is necessary to hammer.

Technically, you can pervert and use strategic nuclear forces to solve a tactical task. But the CBU system is not sharpened for this. Perversion will come out excessively expensive in every sense.

[Dude]

Technically, you can be perverted <...> But the CBU system is not tailored for this

Which, in fact, I had in mind. Purely speculative. Of course, to solve tactical problems, it is preferable to use appropriate means

[Vlad.by]

Yes, do not even hammer that nail. After all, it is possible to tighten a screw 10x200mm neatly in the crotch (exactly between the causal places). With a big step. On wood. For lenn oo and with special cynicism.
For an AUG, the detonation of a single charge of 100 kt at an altitude of 30-50 m within the order is where it will be enough for the AUG to become at least sky-ready for the next month. No? And this is just one (read on the lips - ONE Gauge)
Well, for fidelity there will be more than one in the salvo - about five. And volleys - at least a couple, or even more.
Five through 100 will break through - wonderful! Break through one - great! And who exactly launches it, the nuclear cruiser, Varshavyanka or a bomber - it does not matter.

[Grits]

Quote: ancestors from the Don

Nuclear submarines are a worthy response to US aircraft carriers, they are not suitable for capturing foreign territories, and you can’t imagine a better way for adversaries to knock out teeth

Borea is not intended to knock out teeth. And do not even smash the skull. And immediately turn the carcass into minced meat. Well, or in extreme cases - to ferment into a thin pancake with one hit.

[Armata T-14]

I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

[Ros 56]

So what's the matter, a bunch of scrap metal, a file in your hands and go for it, sir.

[AVA77]

Better get a loan! (Bank scene) What are you going to spend money on?
On the acquisition of the Borei-K submarine with zircons! Ahh ... what do you have as a guarantee of
property? Well ..... then if I give it back to the aircraft carriers, well, when I drown it, so to speak.

[Dude]

Quote: Armata T-14

I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

And can a sacramental question - what for???

[Armata T-14]

To be able to strike at the decision center within minutes

[Dude]

Quote: Armata T-14

To be able to strike at the decision center within minutes

I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

All information, in open sources, states that Zircon - anti-ship rocket, besides with a range 350 ... 600 km.
So I thought: I wonder why you need 200 anti-ship missiles (200 anti-ship missiles on one nuclear submarine are unscientific fiction, of course, oh well) that can hit a surface target located at a distance of 400 to 1600 km from the US coast? And besides, placed, for some reason, not on MAPL, And SSBN?
I think that the Americans' "decision-making center" is located somewhere else.

[Grits]

Quote: Armata T-14

I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

For these purposes, Antaeus ("Batons") are better suited. Boreas just will not cope with the task under the conditions that you drew. It is geared specifically for ballistic missiles. Which are 1000 km. they cannot shoot.

[rocket757]

And KUZMA MININ when / if there will be? After all, a noticeable, heroic FIGURE in the history of the preservation of OUR STATE!
There was such a cruiser in the Imperial Navy! Is it really not worth capturing the name of an outstanding person in a modern Russian fleet by naming a warship.

[ABM]

"Vladimir Monomakh" was

[rocket757]

Quote: ABM

"Vladimir Monomakh" was

Princely, upper class! Minin merchants, consider a commoner .....

[ABM]

The semi-armored frigate Minin was also

[rocket757]

Quote: ABM

The semi-armored frigate Minin was also

Anything happened .... worked on the KIROV cruiser .... then on its completion, only he was then called ANDROPOV .... Brezhnev, Chernenko, Gorbachev and Yeltsin successfully passed by, and now this is our one and only PETER THE GREAT!

[Vlad.by]

Let there be Minin! We have a hundred more in history - there is only another glorious governor. This does not include princes. And the noble and merchant classes, and even just from the people. It would be something to call - there are names, believe me!

[rocket757]

Quote: Vlad.by

It would be something to call - there are names, believe me

Exactly, there would be what to call.

[1976AG]

Quote: rocket757

And KUZMA MININ when / if there will be? After all, a noticeable, heroic FIGURE in the history of the preservation of OUR STATE!
There was such a cruiser in the Imperial Navy! Is it really not worth capturing the name of an outstanding person in a modern Russian fleet by naming a warship.

Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy, and now ... just to give

[rocket757]

The names gave DIFFERENT! There were not enough outstanding naval / nautical names for everything.

[1976AG]

Quote: rocket757

The names gave DIFFERENT! There were not enough outstanding naval / nautical names for everything.

Kings and princes are always more important than heroes ..

[rocket757]

At different times, preferences are also different.

[Sergey Valov]

"Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy" -
Suvorov, Borodino, Tsesarevich, Oleg, Boyarin, Novik, Empress Maria, Dzhigit ... Continue?

[1976AG]

You started in tsarist times, as you however ..)

Quote: Sergey Valov

"Previously, the names of the ships were assigned based on their involvement in the Navy" -
Suvorov, Borodino, Tsesarevich, Oleg, Boyarin, Novik, Empress Maria, Dzhigit ... Continue?

[Paranoid50]

Quote: 1976AG

from the tsarist times began

Duc, your "earlier" is, however, a loose concept.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Sergey Valov

Continue?

"Peresvet", "Oslyabya", "Don't touch me!", "Three glasses" and yes, "Goto Predistinatsiya".

[Vladimir1155]

good news, seven feet under the keel

[bald]

This is the best news

[Rome]

Just curious, strategists after a salvo of missiles, how can a regular apl be able to fight?
It is clear that after a volley it’s kind of like fighting, it’s not why, there’s a question of pure survival, but suddenly the war will continue after the thermonuclear apocalypse, are these submarines capable of anything else?

[Resistance]

Tests are ship. Testing weapons is a different topic, a different time and a different place. So, they hit, did not hit, this is for the romantics of the sea. Ammunition left - offset.

[Old26]

Quote: Vlad.by

Yes, do not even hammer that nail. After all, it is possible to tighten a screw 10x200mm neatly in the crotch (exactly between the causal places). With a big step. On wood. For lenn oo and with special cynicism.
For an AUG, the detonation of a single charge of 100 kt at an altitude of 30-50 m within the order is where it will be enough for the AUG to become at least sky-ready for the next month. No? And this is just one (read on the lips - ONE Gauge)
Well, for fidelity there will be more than one in the salvo - about five. And volleys - at least a couple, or even more.
Five through 100 will break through - wonderful! Break through one - great! And who exactly launches it, the nuclear cruiser, Varshavyanka or a bomber - it does not matter.

The order is most often ships located tens of kilometers around the aircraft carrier. Shooting the intercontinental at AUG - well, very creative. But also very stupid. There are no guarantees that this 100-ct charge will fall into the order at all. Even during the Soviet era, when we created such an anti-ship missile, the power of its heads was about 1,5 MT. And you want to get by with a hundred.

Well, "Caliber" - oh yes, this is a supervunderwaffe. True, with a range of about 400-500 km and subsonic speed. But he will definitely break through to the AUG. Can't help but break through. He is "CALIBER" !!!!

Quote: Armata T-14

I want Borey-K (Borey-Ts?), Stuffed with a couple of hundreds of Zircons, hiding in the depths of the ocean 1000 km from Washington

Want is not harmful. Until "Borea-K" so far in general, as before Beijing, sorry "cancer". Voice acting does not mean that someone will build them.
You will probably have microscopic zircons, since there will be a couple of hundred. True, when "Zircon" is tested from a ship or a boat at all, it remains a virtual weapon ...