Next-generation Arleigh Burke type destroyer launched in the US

72
The U.S. Navy will soon begin to receive the Arleigh Burke type destroyers of the next, third generation. As transmits "Warspot" with the reference to the portal janes.com, at the Huntington Ingalls Shipyard in Virginia, the ceremony of laying the new modernized generation III destroyer was held.

Next-generation Arleigh Burke type destroyer launched in the US

Visualization of the destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125)




At the Huntington Ingalls Shipyard in Virginia, the laying of the lead destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125) of the Arleigh Burke Flight III type, which will be the first ship of a new generation, took place. Formally, its construction began in May last year, and this was the official connection of the first modules of the case.

As explained in the command of the US Navy, the destroyers of the third generation will be similar to the ships of previous generations only externally. The main innovation of the Flight III project was the installation of the new Advanced Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) AN / SPY-6 radar system, which will replace the SPY-1 type radar.

Thanks to the new radar, the crew will have improved target detection capabilities. Developers indicate that AN / SPY-6 is 30 times more sensitive than AN / SPY-1. In addition, the combat system of the ship will be able to work with F-35 fighters in a passive mode, which will allow it to remain unnoticed by the enemy.

New destroyers will receive a modified superstructure, as well as enhanced power plant and some changes in the hull design, increasing the survivability of the ship. In addition, the Flight III destroyers of the Flight III project will be staffed with a larger number of personnel.

Key Features: Displacement at full load 9300 tons. Length 160 meters, width 20 meters, draft 10 meters. 31 knot speed.

Propulsion: four General Electric LM2500-30 gas turbines with a total power of 75000 kW (100000 hp). The total crew will be 380 people.

Armament: 2 universal launchers Mk41 on 32 (bow) and 64 (feed) missiles. The composition of the ammunition, types and number of missiles transported should be determined in accordance with the features of the upcoming military service.

One Mk 45 installation with an 127 mm gun, a pair of Mk 38 anti-aircraft guns with 25-mm guns and one Phalanx CIWS system with 20 mm guns. Artillery weapons to combat surface or air targets are supplemented by four large-caliber machine guns M2HB. Missile anti-submarine weapons reinforced by a pair of three-tube torpedo tubes of caliber 323 mm.

Two helicopters type SH-60 Sea Hawk
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    9 November 2019 13: 53
    MASTERPIECE. We would have twenty such pieces for each fleet!
    1. -8
      9 November 2019 13: 56
      Why do we need such volumes? We are not separated by the ocean from the main theater of political productions.
      1. +26
        9 November 2019 14: 08
        We need them so that the audience in this theater doesn’t climb onto the stage ... and so that overseas theatergoers do not get bored ..
        1. -13
          9 November 2019 14: 11
          To do this, we have 4 magic letters - Strategic Rocket Forces)
          1. +10
            9 November 2019 17: 51
            Here it is, but the ships are still needed. For each work - its own tool.
          2. +2
            11 November 2019 08: 31
            In other words, if you accidentally push someone in the crowd, then you need to demolish your head from the sawn-off shotgun with a doublet, right?
    2. +21
      9 November 2019 13: 59
      But here we have new sketches of RTOs and IPCs from RTOs ..
      1. +24
        9 November 2019 14: 02
        Rook forgotten. and mock-ups in general cause horror in all vorogs
    3. -13
      9 November 2019 14: 00
      Quote: Destiny
      We would have twenty such pieces for each fleet!

      No, we need ships and submarines that will sink these log trucks.
      1. -5
        9 November 2019 14: 14
        Oh, oh, offended Great Omeryga. laughing Bgg.
        1. -5
          9 November 2019 14: 24
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Oh, oh, offended Great Omeryga. laughing Bgg.

          Sergey, if only I offended .... And you are a naughty man, however ... wink
        2. -5
          9 November 2019 22: 31
          Yes, there are a lot of fans of theirs, especially from Warship (a computer game)
        3. +1
          11 November 2019 08: 32
          No, you are not in a position to offend the states, but let your stupidity go to the show.
          1. 0
            11 November 2019 08: 55
            Quote: Cyrus
            No, you are not in a position to offend the states, but let your stupidity go to the show.

            What is the stupidity? Since you are smart and I’m a fool, so enlighten me.
    4. -4
      9 November 2019 14: 22
      The navel will unleash at the economy
      1. +7
        9 November 2019 18: 09
        Quote: Eskobar
        The navel will unleash at the economy

        If there was economy - would not have unleashed. But we, alas, have kleptonomics.
    5. -3
      9 November 2019 14: 31
      Where will the ships moor? At the Yankees bases all over the world are inundated, and even a couple in Ukraine are being modernized.
      And money is needed. First of all, for the development and development of diesel engines and turbines for the same frigates.
    6. 0
      9 November 2019 15: 41
      Yes ...
      Nice boat ...
    7. -7
      9 November 2019 22: 23
      MASTERPIECE

      And where in this masterpiece is a radio-transparent case? And how much does he carry supersonic anti-ship missiles? )))
      1. +1
        11 November 2019 08: 34
        and how many cells will carry so many.
        1. +1
          11 November 2019 10: 10
          No, at least half of all cells will go under air defense needs. These are approximately 24 long / medium range + 96 short-range missiles.
          Well, 48 cells remain on axes / harpoons and other unprecedented crap.
  2. +7
    9 November 2019 14: 00
    I'm nothing, but the toad is choking. ... belay
  3. +21
    9 November 2019 14: 02
    For all the obvious and controversial disadvantages of Arlie Burke, the very concept of mass construction of relatively light (10 kt, +/-) multipurpose destroyers looks much more successful than domestic "fairy tales" about plans for 8-12 atomic wunderwaves in almost 20 kt of living weight.
    What was bad for pr.21956 for its time? Only a small shock potential in 16 cells UKKS? It is not a problem, in fact, to double or even triple them without making global changes to the project. But no, we’d better compose tales from year to year about how our Leader (his plastic model, apparently) will be able to stand alone against the entire American fleet
    1. +4
      9 November 2019 14: 20
      Well, the power plant - there are Zorev marching D090 + DT59 afterburners. These engines can only be repaired with grief in half and then it’s the turn for a five-year plan for repairs. They do not plan to put them into production.

      Well, everything else needs to be changed. Radar fixed blades. Throw drums to the junkyard of history. Etc.
      1. +10
        9 November 2019 14: 35
        About seven years ago, I probably began to get involved in the military-industrial sector, mainly with regard to the navy. As seven years ago, one of the main problems of our Navy was the lack of engines, so it is now. And not the fact that in the next seven years something will change dramatically. And the problem here is not that our defense industry engineers cannot show the world something intelligible and working, but, in most cases, in a simple and banal lack of funding.
        This is not a computer strategy game where you press the button on the shipyard, choose the boat you like and wait a couple of minutes for it to be built. And our "top" it was according to this scheme and thought to revive the fleet. They made a model of the ship in the design bureau, brought it to the exhibition, showed it to everyone, gave interviews to all federal channels and that's it, the people are happy. And do not care that there are no engines, the air defense system shoots by (although it is serially installed on other ships), the radar will provide illumination not in a state, there are no catapults (hello to the Krylov Storm!) And so on, and so on, and so on. The main thing is to say on the news "unparalleled in the world", and then we'll figure it out in the place
        1. -13
          9 November 2019 14: 49
          Quote: Wiruz
          About seven years ago, I probably began to get involved in the military-industrial sector, mainly with regard to the navy. As seven years ago, one of the main problems of our Navy was the lack of engines, so it is now

          I’ve heard out of the corner of my ear (never once for seven years) about some new test benches, gearboxes ... didn’t you hear anything like that, by any chance? For seven years? wink
          1. +8
            9 November 2019 14: 59
            I heard how. The last couple of them say that the domestic power plant for frigates pr.22350 promises to be, and I personally sincerely hope that it will be. They just realized it late, when they realized that ordering in Ukraine would no longer be possible. As a result - for six whole years there were no new bookmarks according to these frigates. Even semi-official rumors went about plans to put nuclear weapons on ships of the second rank, obviously not from a good life
            1. -9
              9 November 2019 15: 01
              Quote: Wiruz
              I heard how. Last a couple of people say that domestic powerplant for frigates pr.22350 promises to be, and I personally sincerely hope that it will be

              In more detail, and with the facts... about engines exactly. And then in seven years of "interest" - it will be somehow liquid ...

              Smacks of criticism (c) laughing
        2. +3
          9 November 2019 20: 14
          Quote: Wiruz
          And the problem here is not that our defense industry engineers cannot show the world something intelligible and working, but, in most cases, in a simple and banal lack of funding.

          If you agree with your statement of the question, and I simply don’t see another statement, it turns out that the government, knowing about the problem and not financing the work to remove the problem from the agenda, simply boycotts the solution to the question.
    2. -12
      9 November 2019 14: 29
      Alexei, a memorial service is good for us to sing. Yes, even if a barge with cells, we have Che, Shtirlitsy mocked?
      1. -6
        9 November 2019 14: 32
        Quote: sabakina
        what, Stirlitzi funded?

        Um ... Vyacheslav, laughing hi
        1. -4
          9 November 2019 14: 37
          Golovan Jack, translated .... I think you should have written? Oops, Saturday however ... drinks Moreover, at the same time I watch REN TV ..... laughing
          1. -6
            9 November 2019 14: 41
            Quote: sabakina
            at the same time watching REN TV

            laughing good laughing
      2. +8
        9 November 2019 14: 38
        we have, Shtirlitsy had fun?

        Well ... I do not think at all that they have died out, but what "Center" they serve - alas, I don't know
        1. -6
          9 November 2019 14: 45
          Alexey, I know what I should not know. But I know, because I know what I don’t know ... In general, I am confused who I am .... recourse
          1. -3
            9 November 2019 15: 30
            I know that I don’t know anything!
  4. +2
    9 November 2019 14: 11
    as the people say .. "well-fed, the hungry will not understand" .. although there is another saying. "there will be a holiday on our street." I could not find other words for this news.
  5. -14
    9 November 2019 14: 19
    "In addition, the ship's combat system will be able to work with F-35 fighters in a passive mode, which will allow it to remain unnoticed by the enemy."
    And the guns will not turn on the radar, so as not to "shine" and will wait for the "illumination" from AWACS laughing Some crazy scheme comes out))) Either light up the "stealth", which cost a lot of dough just because of "invisibility", or light up the destroyer)))
    1. +7
      9 November 2019 14: 21
      Well, you compare the approximate EPR of the destroyer and the distance from which it can be detected by the enemy’s aircraft, and the F-35 EPR with its enemy detection range. The scheme seems quite logical, as for me. But whether it will be sensible in practice is unknown.
      1. -6
        9 November 2019 14: 27
        You did not take into account such a factor as the radio horizon))) As a result, the guns may be in the sight even BEFORE the Burke is detected. Height, height))) This is with regard to the radar of ground complexes. For an airborne radar, the situation is different, but in any case, the Fu-35 that turned on the radar is a corpse.
        1. +2
          9 November 2019 14: 39
          I won't say anything for the ground ones. Here, as I understand it, it meant a combination of "destroyer + aviation" against just aviation
  6. +3
    9 November 2019 14: 19
    Arleigh Burke Flight III is the Zumwalt funeral.
    1. -1
      9 November 2019 23: 48
      Hardly. Sue and his two friends, these are floating stands for testing new systems and new concepts for their operation. And apparently the US is in no hurry. New ships such as Sue distant perspective.
  7. +9
    9 November 2019 14: 24
    Right now, of course, hurray the patriots will drag out the song about "calibers" and "zircons", tomorrow there will be an article about how many anti-ship missiles are needed to sink this ship, but it must be admitted that the ship, judging by its characteristics, is a worthy and dangerous enemy.
    1. -12
      9 November 2019 14: 52
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      but we must admit that shipjudging by the characteristics worthy and dangerous opponent.

      ... for the ship. Yes Offshore, this is an ordinary ship with weapons:

      It is the Americans who are worried about their quantitative presence in the Eastern Hemisphere. Take it easy. Russia is not going to conquer America, but we will meet the "uninvited guests" with dignity, do not even hesitate. There will be "Calibers", and "Zircons", and "Daggers" ...
      Recognizing an adversary’s advantage does not mean admitting your own defeat ...
      hi
    2. +2
      9 November 2019 16: 00
      Oh yes, we’re zirconing in caliber, oh yes, there’s light according to Orly, and Burke-ooo.
    3. +2
      9 November 2019 16: 12
      Leader .. You forgot to mention Khibiny ... - there will be enough of them to make all the adversaries run away ...)))
    4. +1
      9 November 2019 16: 43
      In fact, you are right. Hurray farts jerk in ecstasy.
  8. -1
    9 November 2019 14: 25
    Quote: Stroibat stock
    backlight from AWACS

    ... based on an aircraft carrier laughing
    1. -2
      9 November 2019 14: 58
      You are mistaken. He will start with the Premier League laughing hi
  9. -7
    9 November 2019 14: 28
    Next-generation Arleigh Burke type destroyer launched in the US

    But what about "Zamvolt"? All? Bobby dead? lol
    1. +5
      9 November 2019 14: 40
      It’s not bad that the cow died, but that the neighbor’s is alive. Yes? winked
      1. +7
        9 November 2019 15: 09
        It’s bad that the neighbor, instead of expensive elite cows that eat only elite fodder and all that is so painful and choosy, decided to breed a whole herd of ordinary burenki, which can be used for burdocks and don’t care where to graze.
  10. +1
    9 November 2019 16: 13
    Yes friends. It is necessary to recognize this fact. I would like to hear from my own. Well, where is ............. our dog rummaged ?????? We can ..... ??? !!!!!!!!! .. soon the Soviet backlog will end, we are getting old ...... I want good news ...... so ...... let bryubzhat .......... I do not want to offend anyone ..... boiling ........ I apologize .......!
    1. +1
      10 November 2019 00: 15
      In order to please such news, we need a strong science and good financing, which relies on a strong economy. But the latter will not be without the rule of law.
  11. -9
    9 November 2019 17: 44
    Jack H. Lucas - what is it about Vasya?
    1. +7
      9 November 2019 18: 48
      Quote: Charik
      what is Vasya

      Instead of writing this complete disrespect for an unknown person, the comment could be independently verified, it's a matter of a second. And this is not "Vasya", but a Marine, who with his body saved three comrades from the explosion of two Japanese grenades during the battles for Iwo Jima, for which he received the Medal of Honor (the highest US military award) at the age of 17.
      1. -3
        9 November 2019 22: 28
        A. Matrosov, Ch. Tuleberdyev, these are the Heroes defending their land, the Americans are constantly attacking everyone, what kind of hero was Macain, the same ship with his name, bushes in general, maniacs-avik with his name, campaign and in warps for striped drown “What about you?” - from where does the knowledge of Amer heroes come from?
        1. +4
          10 November 2019 00: 11
          Quote: Charik
          that’s where the knowledge of Amer’s heroes comes from, yes?

          I was not too lazy to check in whose honor this destroyer is named, which I also wish you.

          I don’t see the point in answering anything else, and I don’t accept familiarity and personalization.
        2. +2
          10 November 2019 00: 12
          Well, we had our own heroes in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan - are they also killer maniacs?

          Quote: Charik
          a campaign and in a warps for striped drowning, but Vasya? that's where the knowledge of Amer heroes, yes?

          Do you use only things created and produced in the Russian Federation and allied countries? Kristallik what brand does your computer have?)))
        3. 0
          11 November 2019 08: 51
          Charik you and this is not treated.
  12. +3
    9 November 2019 19: 17
    Next-generation Arleigh Burke type destroyer launched in the US

    A good karablik, the previous generation was stamped in large numbers - we are not in a hurry to implement our projects yet.
  13. +1
    9 November 2019 20: 21
    380 people are not too much for the destroyer?
  14. -2
    9 November 2019 20: 28
    Quote: Chit
    Yes ...
    Nice boat ...

    Yes. Moreover, out of 9 ships of the IIA + series in service, they have only 3 (another 6 in construction), and they are already starting a new series ... Envy takes from their shipbuilding program ...
  15. +4
    9 November 2019 22: 29
    What kind of garbage, why not warned in advance. We always voice all fantasies and projects 5 years before the start of assembly. Sneaky Yankees.
  16. 0
    9 November 2019 23: 11
    Comrades, specialists!
    Please tell me a more or less likely scenario for this ship using this thing:
    Mk 45 mount with 127 mm gun

    Is he going to roam somewhere alone, or in the company of "mosquitoes"?
    1. 0
      11 November 2019 08: 52
      Shoot RTOs, such an answer would suit ?.
    2. 0
      11 November 2019 11: 15
      And why should this RTO approach the distance of an artillery shot?
  17. 0
    9 November 2019 23: 21
    And the Yankees take over our experience. We also once loudly announced the creation of the S-400 (and so that it looked like the S-300). It’s not even clear that the first time they drove in the parade. And then another 8 years finished the system before starting deliveries to the troops and selling abroad.
    And with the locator it’s even more interesting. Increasing sensitivity in the locator is not difficult. It is difficult to then drop false targets. And if it is the receivers that have been finalized, will EW not burn them.
  18. 0
    10 November 2019 01: 34
    Quote: NordOst16
    In order to please such news, we need a strong science and good financing, which relies on a strong economy. But the latter will not be without the rule of law.

    These are all fairy tales for children. The economy is ruled by the dollar and the states. As long as this is so, unwanted countries and regimes will be in the fifth point. And if you add corruption to this. No matter how hard-edged "finanists" tried, and what 200 years ago and now the Americans are buying up resources from local "aborigines" for beads. And the aborigine is happy. Only breaking the dollar world hegemony can somehow "raise" the economy of the countries disloyal to the United States and its vassals. It is corny and uryak - but it is a fact.
    1. -2
      10 November 2019 03: 58
      Quote: KJIETyc
      it is a fact


      This is just a hypothesis.
  19. +1
    10 November 2019 11: 52
    We also designed and built good buildings: 1135 and 956. There is also nothing to bother with, improve the filling and put it on the high-speed conveyor in the case.
    I remember a specialist talking about his young years. So they worked out so that the turbine compartment of the 675th brigade was assembled in 2 weeks.
    Clearly state the tasks and timely finance, ours will do everything