Upgraded submarines Irkutsk and BPC Marshal Shaposhnikov will receive Zircons

Undergoing major repairs and modernization, the large anti-submarine ship (BOD) of the 1155 project Marshal Shaposhnikov and the multipurpose nuclear submarine of the 949 project (Antey) Irkutsk will be able to use the latest Zircon hypersonic missiles after returning to service. This was announced by Deputy Minister of Defense of Russia Alexey Krivoruchko.

Krivoruchko visited the Far Eastern shipbuilding cluster, where he checked the progress of modernization of the Marshal Shaposhnikov project at the Dalzavod Shiprepair Center in Vladivostok and the multipurpose nuclear submarine of the 1155 Project (Antey) Irkutsk undergoing modernization at Daln Zvezda factory in the Big Stone of Primorsky Krai.

According to the deputy minister, the upgraded BOD and nuclear submarines will receive universal launchers allowing the use of Zircon hypersonic missiles.

In 2020 year, we should get the modernized ship "Marshal Shaposhnikov". (...) The universal launchers this ship will receive will allow it to use the latest Zircon hypersonic missiles in the future

- Krivoruchko told reporters, adding that the submarine Irkutsk will also be able to use Zircons.

Earlier it was reported that the multipurpose nuclear submarine of the 949А project (Antey) Irkutsk will be upgraded to the 949AM level. During modernization, new universal launchers for modern Caliber or Zircon cruise missiles will be installed on the submarine, which will replace Granit anti-ship missiles. The return of the submarines to the Pacific Fleet is planned in 2022.

After the modernization, the BOD of the 1155 project “Marshal Shaposhnikov” will become a frigate, a decision on this has already been made. During the modernization, he will receive the anti-ship complex "Uranus" with X-35 missiles and universal launchers for cruise missiles "Caliber", "Onyx" or "Zircon". The return of the ship to the Pacific Fleet is scheduled for next year.

Comments

[aszzz888]

We are modernizing large ships, and introducing small ones into operation — small ones — corvettes, frigates. Perhaps at this time this is the best option. It's my personal opinion.

[kapitan92]

Quote: aszzz888

We are modernizing large ships, and introducing small ones into operation — small ones — corvettes, frigates. Perhaps at this time this is the best option. It's my personal opinion.

BOD displacement 7500tn. With the construction of new problems. God grant in 2027 we will see.
5000 tons, at the very least have mastered it, and even then "give it back" for 5 years.
Recently, this topic was discussed at VO.
The 1155 series is successful, after modernization, it will serve 10 years, there are only 8 of them. left.
Another question, the timing of repair and modernization, BPK "Shaposhnikov" from 2016. worth it if in 2020. the fleet will be given 4 years !!!

[Artemiy_2]

I don’t think for 10 years. Krivoruchko said that even 1234 modernized for another 16 years will serve

[Vladimir1155]

1155 only 4 pieces are ready, and the pair is under repair

[kapitan92]

Quote: vladimir1155

1155 only 4 pieces are ready, and the pair is under repair

Under project 1155, 12 large anti-submarine ships were built, a third of which were decommissioned and disposed of in the past.. Six or seven BODs of this type are in service, while Marshal Shaposhnikov has been under repair and modernization since 2016. After his return to service, the command plans to resolve the issue of updating the remaining BOD of the same type. So far, there are no clear plans of this kind.

https://topwar.ru/158541-modernizacija-bpk-proektov-1155-i-1124m.html

[antivirus]

a few more small spoons in the piggy bank - already good
partners are "happy"

[DarkMatter]

Six or seven BODs of this type serve

So six or seven? How can you lose a ship with a displacement of 7500 tons (the destroyer actually)?

In fact, 5 BODs out of 9 are currently in operation.
In the North: Severomorsk and Kulakov.
Chabanenko hung on to wait for repairs, which, according to the most optimistic estimates, will end no earlier than 23 years, that is, I would say no earlier than 24, taking into account our realities.
Levchenko has not been on the move for some time now and, apparently, in anticipation of a full repair (with modernization), which is not even clear when it will begin. Most likely it will begin no earlier than the same 22-23 years. And the same 3-4 years will most likely continue, that is, we will see it only + - in 7 years. Although we will hope for an earlier start of work. The duration may be due to the fact that the repair of both Tributs and Shaposhnikov revealed a huge amount of additional work on the hull (which partially led to puffs). For example, Tributs was sent for repair in 2013, and he returned only in 2016, and Shaposhnikov has been in repair / modernization for 4 years and he is not finished.

At the Pacific Fleet: Panteleev, Vinogradov and Tributs.
Shaposhnikova I doubt that they will hand over the next year, judging by the course of work. If only for the new year and then it is unlikely. I would say no earlier than 21 years.
Tributs only returned a couple of years after the repair with partial modernization. So they probably will not touch him yet.
Well, first look at the results of the modernization of Shaposhnikov, and they will plan what to do next.
What I want to note. Nevertheless, time has power over everyone, including the so-called fleet workhorses. What is now shown by inspections of repaired ships. We need normal maintenance and timely repairs throughout the service. The situation is not entirely critical, although delay can now cause irreparable damage, but also not entirely rosy, as many publications write about the repair / modernization of all BOD, which is about to begin and now consider it will end.

[Vladimir1155]

Kharlamov is gone forever, about Levchenko and Chabanenko, it’s not a fact that they will be repaired taking into account the wear and tear of the engines, it’s good if 6 pieces remain in service, and then no more than 10-12 years

[kapitan92]

Quote: DarkMatter

So six or seven? How can you lose a ship with a displacement of 7500 tons (the destroyer actually)?

Dear! I gave a link to the VO site. If you have any objections, this is to the author of the article on VO,

Quote: DarkMatter

Chabanenko hung on waiting for repairs,

12 were made, the 13th according to project 1155.1 this is "Chabanenko". Adopted by the fleet in 1999.
Still "young" in comparison with their predecessors. Officially under renovation since 2014
How long this repair will last, God alone knows!

Quote: DarkMatter

Levchenko has not been on the move for some time now and, apparently, in anticipation of a full repair (with modernization), which is not even clear when it will begin.

Will begin! After the completion of the modernization of "Shaposhnikov" in 2020-22, our admirals appraised the results of the modernization, project financing, etc.

Quote: DarkMatter

The situation is not entirely critical

I think you are an optimist!

[Artemiy_2]

5 same. 3 on Pacific Fleet and 2 on SF

[ser56]

Quote: kapitan92

Another question, the timing of repair and modernization, BPK "Shaposhnikov" from 2016. worth it if in 2020. the fleet will be given 4 years !!!

By the way, the ship was built in 3 years ...

[Alexey RA]

Quote: ser56

By the way, the ship was built in 3 years ...

But not to the end - there was no nasal AP "Dagger" in 1987 on "Marshal Shaposhnikov".

[ser56]

Quote: Alexey RA

nasal AP "Dagger"

Thank! I didn’t know ... as always - they didn’t fulfill the plan, they handed it over with deficiencies to a letter of guarantee ...

[kapitan92]

Quote: ser56

By the way, the ship was built in 3 years ..

Honor and respect to the Soviet shipbuilders!

[Marconi41]

Quote: kapitan92

With the construction of new problems. God grant in 2027 we will see.

The main thing is that they would not calm down. And then the BOD will be converted into strike ships and will be hammered for the construction of new ones for a long time.

[kapitan92]

Quote: Marconi41

And then the BOD will be converted into strike ships and will be hammered for the construction of new ones for a long time.

According to the info from our Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, the deadline may be postponed to 2021, then the command will review the results of the modernization and decide on further ships. Something like that.

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: aszzz888

Large ships are being upgraded

for good, all BOD and Antey need to be modernized

[soul]

Still, they would have taken on the unfinished Pike-B (NEA plant No. 519) for themselves. It may be necessary to drag her to Sevmash for this.

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: alma

Still for unfinished Pike-B took

+ all living Shuki-B is the same for modernization ..... the only question is in capacity and money .., it really is not permissible for us any modernization to last .....

[parkello]

7 feet to him under the keel ...

[Nycomed]

And when was Shaposhnikov built?

[kapitan92]

Quote: Nycomed

And when was Shaposhnikov built?

From 1980 to 1991, 13 BODs of project 1155 were built (one of them was for improved project 1155.1). To date, eight such ships have remained in service - four in the Pacific Fleet and the same in the Northern Fleet.
"Shaposhnikov" since 1986 in the ranks.

[Nycomed]

The Americans are already writing off the Ticonderogs of those years ...

[kapitan92]

Quote: Nycomed

The Americans are already writing off the Ticonderogs of those years ...

A total of 27 UIC-type Ticonderoga cruisers were built. 22 cruisers remain in service. 11 of them are in reserve. Years of construction since 1983. So they are not in a hurry to write off!

[Vladimir1155]

repair and re-equipment of nuclear submarines is much more important, nuclear submarines are very necessary

[Charik]

but where is this BOD-UVP in the bow? Are those oblique under X35?

[Alexey-74]

Perhaps the architecture will change, and launchers will change, make it vertical (for Onyx, Caliber, Zircon)

[Artemiy_2]

Instead of the second gun, they put two ZS-14s. Instead of uranium sockets

[alexmach]

Instead of a second art installation. It’s a pity they didn’t put a new one for him. At least 16 Calm cells would be just fine.

[Ros 56]

This is good for us and our allies, let potential rivals scratch their turnips before doing disgusting things.

[Old26]

Quote: Alexey-74

Perhaps the architecture will change, and launchers will change, make it vertical (for Onyx, Caliber, Zircon)

Not possible, but most likely to change. Surely they will remove inclined ones on anti-submarine missiles.

[Charik]

And where then to put X35

[Chicha squad]

Who is there only these Tsirokny will not receive, according to the news. Would have installed at least something.

[Ryaruav]

it’s good that a large number of ships will be armed with zircons, but so far even about testing these missiles the silence of the lambs

[Old26]

Quote: Charik

And where then to put X35

After your post, I re-read the note and suddenly realized that the last phrase in the note

In the course of modernization, it will receive the Uranus anti-ship complex with Kh-35 missiles and universal launchers for the Kalibr, Onyx or Zircon cruise missiles.

frank delirium. If "Caliber", "Onyx" and, in the future, "Zircons" are put on, then why are "Uranus" needed then?