Military Review

National Interest: Russians have big plans for MiG-31

130
Russian VKS have big plans for MiG-31 interceptors, write the American media. In addition to their main tasks, these aircraft must now launch dagger missiles and fight with enemy satellites. Recently, the Russian Ministry of Defense showed footage of exercises in the stratosphere, revealing the main features of the new modification of the MiG-31BM.




The published video demonstrates the protection of the country's air borders. During the exercises, the MiG-31 interceptor of the basic modification monitored airspace and helped ground-based radars. After the intruder was discovered, two modernized MiG-31BMs flew to intercept. They found the target and carried out a training attack from 150 km.


Fighter aviation regularly conducts such exercises. But recent events had an important feature: flights took place at altitudes of 18000 m and at speeds of 2800 km / h.

According to the TASS news agency, 10 crews participated in the flights - probably they alternately played the roles of interceptors and intruders. Since the events were attended by the upgraded MiG-31BM, their goal could be to train pilots and test equipment.

Thus, the MiG-31 service continues. Conservation and modernization of interceptors contribute to their high flight data and carrying capacity. The latter has recently been used for carrying dagger aeroballistic missiles. 12-16 aircraft with such weapons have been on duty in the Black Sea since the middle of last year. Thus, the MiG-31 is now not only an interceptor, but also an attack missile carrier.


The latest modernization of the MiG-31БМ from 2010 follows the favorite Russian tradition of updating equipment. The finished platform is equipped with modern electronics and weapons, which gives the desired result at a reasonable cost. The MiG-31BM retains not the new but successful D-30F6 engine, but also receives the Zaslon-M radar, a “glass cabin” and digital controls.


In the meantime, it is planned to create a new complex of on-board equipment with enhanced characteristics for the promising MiG-41 interceptor, which can enter the troops by the end of the 20's. It is expected that this aircraft will be hypersonic and will be able to rise into the near space. However, before its appearance, the interception of intruders and the launch of the “Daggers” will be the task of the MiG-31BM aircraft.
130 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sentinel-vs
    Sentinel-vs 8 November 2019 10: 07
    +23
    In the military museum in Verkhnyaya Pyshma exhibited MiG-31. Oh, and he is huge when you are standing nearby. In photos, size is not transmitted.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 8 November 2019 12: 34
      +1
      Su27 no less ... I saw in the courtyard of the Red Army Museum. Mig21 is just a kid
      1. Avis-bis
        Avis-bis 8 November 2019 14: 59
        +5
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Su27 no less

        Formally, in size, maybe not less, but the MiG-31 relative to the Su-27 really looks more massive for obvious reasons - hefty side airbags, a wide classic fuselage and so on. A protruding parachute container visually does not add size to the Su-27.


        But what does the MiG-21 have to do with it? No one mentioned him.
        1. Sentinel-vs
          Sentinel-vs 8 November 2019 16: 36
          +6
          Apparently, a friend watched in the museum of the Su-27 near the MiG-21, and here it reports that the MiG-21 looks like a kid, not in relation to the comparison with the MiG-31.
          1. Zaurbek
            Zaurbek 8 November 2019 19: 47
            +1
            Exactly. .and MiG29 is also a baby next to them
          2. Avis-bis
            Avis-bis 9 November 2019 06: 51
            -1
            Quote: Sentinel-vs
            Apparently, a friend watched in the museum of the Su-27 near the MiG-21, and here it reports that the MiG-21 looks like a kid, not in relation to the comparison with the MiG-31.

            Then the meaning of his posting is completely incomprehensible to me.
            "Wow, what a big carriage!"
            "And the locomotive has an engine!"
    2. svp67
      svp67 8 November 2019 18: 05
      +5
      Quote: Sentinel-vs
      Oh, and he is huge when you are standing nearby. In photos, size is not transmitted.

      Oh, and loud on take-off .... Photography does not transmit sound ...
  2. Invoce
    Invoce 8 November 2019 10: 09
    +19
    The MiG-31 is the best aircraft in its class. There are no analogues in the world. No end for modernization. The United States expects to operate the B-52 until the middle of the 21st century! belay Despite the fact that the aircraft was released in the late 50s of the 20th century! So the MiG-31 will be in demand for another 50 years!
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 8 November 2019 10: 37
      +4
      Well .... 50 years will not work ... request
      1. VO3A
        VO3A 8 November 2019 12: 46
        +5
        Guesses out loud do not need to be voiced. 140 Mig-31 remained in the arsenal of the VKS. Airplanes were produced before 1994 and more than 500 aircraft were produced ... There is an upgrade to the Mig-31BM level ... Started in 2013, 2016 cars were intensively executed from 20 about a year per year ... According to some sources, the resource of cars will reach 30 years, according to others they will add 15 years after modernization ... Information on the first option is erroneous, probably, and on the second too advertising ... The truth is somewhere in the middle, and the resource extension as of each side individually .... The aircraft is high-speed, operation is difficult, problems with the flashlight and engines are not very ... After 2025 problems will arise with the need to replace .... And with the B-52 iron you do not need to compare, it’s rather crawling through the sky than flying, like the Tu-95 ....
        1. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 8 November 2019 14: 03
          +4
          Quote: VO3A
          more than 500 machines were produced ... Upgrading to the Mig-31BM level is ongoing ...

          I cannot argue about the total number of aircraft produced, but at present infa claims about 250 "pieces" in service and storage ... The total number of "in service", indeed, can be, somewhere, 140 cars ... but the number of MiG-31BM and MiG-31K is slightly less ...
        2. Su24
          Su24 9 November 2019 17: 41
          -1
          Quote: VO3A
          From the open press, 140 Mig-31 remained in service with the VKS


          This is 140 pieces of the MiG-31BM. In total there are 250-300 of them, together with machines in storage.
          1. okko077
            okko077 9 November 2019 22: 06
            0
            Just for you, enjoy!
            https://militaryarms.ru/armii-mira/vvs-rossii/#h2_3
            Dream further about BM .. A contract for 60 cars has been signed and is being implemented ...
            MiG-31K we have 10 pieces on duty ...
    2. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 8 November 2019 10: 44
      +2
      Yes, the plane still has great prospects. And it is good that during the Soviet Union they were "riveted" enough - you can gradually modernize.
    3. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 8 November 2019 12: 35
      +1
      And who else is in his class in the world?
      1. Sentinel-vs
        Sentinel-vs 8 November 2019 12: 46
        +1
        There are probably no analogues. At one time, in some way, these functions were performed by the F-14, providing cover for the AUG, but now they have been written off, and I do not even know other long-range interceptors.
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 8 November 2019 13: 53
          0
          Well then, how can he be the best in his class? Moreover, F14 with phoenixes was in something worse, and in something better!
          1. Avis-bis
            Avis-bis 8 November 2019 15: 12
            +3
            Quote: Zaurbek
            F14 with phoenixes was in something worse, and in something better!

            What's better? The missile launch range (Phoenix and R-33) is approximately the same, the MiG-31's speed of reaching the launch line is higher. The F-14 is better only because, unlike the MiG-31, it can be based in two environments at once? :)
            1. Zaurbek
              Zaurbek 8 November 2019 19: 46
              +2
              It seems that the Phoenix had an active GSN and a computer with advanced modes.
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 8 November 2019 10: 10
    +11
    Our ancestors created the PLANE!
    Effectively serve the descendants.
    It’s just interesting, but when and what similar \ is it better to create?
    1. knn54
      knn54 8 November 2019 11: 06
      +3
      I agree. Prospects have not yet been exhausted.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 8 November 2019 11: 19
        +1
        If you look closely, read ... now the scandal is on the scandal, because manager-accountants run the modern designers !!! Who and where now has created something so that on the CENTURY ???
        Disposable deshovs ... however, NOT CHEAP, but still disposable!
        Itself was convinced, at a new GRANTA a hood with two fingers washed, closing it .... the acquaintance nearly bit me !!! What am I to blame? The car should not miss this ... it seems?
        1. Ros 56
          Ros 56 8 November 2019 13: 05
          0
          There are different fingers, I have an older finger at Shuryak, my fingers are almost two, I had a healthy man.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 8 November 2019 13: 14
            +1
            Quote: Ros 56
            There are different fingers, I have an older finger at Shuryak, my fingers are almost two, I had a healthy man.

            So then, I, not weak, but in any way an epic hero. At least, wrenches and bolts do not break often.
            Here is my NIV - SHEVIKOV, hoods do not wrinkle ... though they were not released yesterday, therefore we can be strong!
            1. Ros 56
              Ros 56 8 November 2019 13: 22
              0
              Well, everything is clear here for iron, in our club the pilot-instructor had a BMW of the Stirlitz type, so he welded the body with electric welding, even kissed the PAZ once, the dent was dented, and only scratched his paint. hi
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 8 November 2019 13: 36
                +2
                It seems that the time has run out for cars, on the hood of which could girls, light ... weight, dance.
                1. Ros 56
                  Ros 56 8 November 2019 13: 40
                  0
                  What kind of girls, I almost knocked the wing on Megan’s knee, it was plastic well, springed. So I ride on the UAZ, as it is more familiar.
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 8 November 2019 13: 45
                    +1
                    Volga M 21 .... my friend will not let his wife go to her, my daughter too, and my trembling half could quite, quite be able to, because really half of me ... "mutton weight" and nothing else.
                    1. Leopold
                      Leopold 8 November 2019 15: 38
                      +3
                      Victor hi I beg you to interfere. I had 2121 - I walked on the roof boldly (I got the cat from the entrance visor), then 21213 - the experience was not successful, cost a dent on the "forehead" of the roof, now 21214 - I don't even dare to repeat the previous experiments. 81st, 96th and 11th year of release. This is the trend. recourse
                      1. rocket757
                        rocket757 8 November 2019 16: 23
                        +1
                        Quote: Leopold
                        . 81st, 96th and 11th year of release

                        I have about the same, now shevik seven-year ...
                        Not armor, but definitely stronger than the new AvtoVAZ crafts.
                        They save on metal. It’s easier, it’s possible to push a grant from one place, but there is no fortress.
                      2. Leopold
                        Leopold 8 November 2019 19: 52
                        +3
                        No comments. recourse Bumper on the first - atas was generally. I did not bend, but ruled for two hours. I was ready to kill, we are a hangover, and they .... a sledgehammer for iron. crying
                    2. Demon_is_ada
                      Demon_is_ada 8 November 2019 15: 58
                      +2
                      No, M21 is not it, my father had a favorite M20 car. Victory, by the way, is still alive, needs a little repair, so they trusted me to wash her, but she was tall to the roof, took and climbed laughing ... And inside the back seat - a sofa of increased comfort, for convenience and comfort I have not seen more of these cars ...
                      1. rocket757
                        rocket757 8 November 2019 17: 18
                        +3
                        Quote: Demon_is_ada
                        No, M21 is not it, my father had a favorite M20 car. Victory, by the way, is still alive, needs a little repair, so they trusted me to wash her, but she was tall to the roof, took and climbed laughing ... And inside the back seat - a sofa of increased comfort, for convenience and comfort I have not seen more of these cars ...

                        What can I say, VICTORY is a wonderful car. I have a hood from it ..... if you need to cover it more firmly. I can’t say that there are no traces of rust, where there are scratches, and it’s quite strong.
              2. Avis-bis
                Avis-bis 8 November 2019 15: 16
                +2
                Quote: Ros 56
                Well, everything is clear here for iron, in our club the pilot-instructor had a BMW of the Stirlitz type, so he welded the body with electric welding, even kissed the PAZ once, the dent was dented, and only scratched his paint. hi

                Well so ... The era was such. According to legend, during the Brussels auto exhibition GAZ-21 went to show off on the streets of the city and ran into a tram. The tram had to be put on the rails. GAZ-21 also had to ... To tint a little scratch paintwork. Even if the bike, then such from scratch do not arise.
  4. Fantazer911
    Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 11
    -9
    Handsome, a successful interceptor with a decent speed of 46.6 km per second
    1. Crash_117
      Crash_117 8 November 2019 10: 17
      +5
      Quote: Fantazer911
      at a decent speed of 46.6 km per second

      What kind of nonsense? what
      1. Fantazer911
        Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 25
        -10
        2800: 60 = 46.6 is this really crazy? hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. kjhg
          kjhg 8 November 2019 10: 29
          +16
          Quote: Fantazer911
          2800: 60 = 46.6 is this really crazy? hi

          Really nonsense. Do not be offended by the question, but how much did you have at the math school?
          1. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 34
            -3
            I did not count correctly?
            Correct me please and tell me unless 2800 divided by 60 is not 46.6?
            1. Crash_117
              Crash_117 8 November 2019 10: 47
              +11
              At your calculation - this is the speed in MINUTES!
              March to school. fool
        3. lucul
          lucul 8 November 2019 10: 29
          +6
          2800: 60 = 46.6 is this really crazy?

          Kghm .....
          And at 3600 (just that many seconds in 1 hour) do not want to divide? ))))
          And then you get 46km / minute ....
          1. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 32
            -13
            The article says 2800, if 3600 then this is another figure
            3600: 60 = 60
            1. Crash_117
              Crash_117 8 November 2019 10: 36
              +9
              Yeah ... Here people have trouble with elementary school mathematics, and I still wonder why there is sometimes all sorts of nonsense written about the backward west and the like.
              1. Nasrat
                Nasrat 8 November 2019 10: 45
                -5
                It is strange that no one exam has yet recalled the victims of it ... laughing
                Although, comrad clearly studied under the USSR ... then everything was better than now fellow
                1. seregin-s1
                  seregin-s1 8 November 2019 11: 00
                  +14
                  nobody is written together))
                  1. Nasrat
                    Nasrat 8 November 2019 12: 47
                    -5
                    It is true that they did not finish learning the Russian language in the USSR ... again, the USE in flight !!! laughing
                    Although there are exceptions to this rule:

                    Examples
                    We did not know who this man was, nor who sent him to us with this assignment.

                    In the New Year's mess, the children did not see, neither who brought gifts, nor who hid them under the Christmas tree.
                    It is unclear who neither called the night before, nor who is now knocking on our door.

                    After the snowfall it is impossible to establish, neither who left their traces here, nor who broke the branches from the tree.

                2. rocket757
                  rocket757 8 November 2019 11: 30
                  0
                  Quote: Nasr
                  It is strange that no one exam has yet recalled the victims of it ... laughing
                  Although, comrad clearly studied under the USSR ... then everything was better than now fellow

                  There has always been ... someone is studying, and someone is driving the bulldozer.
                  But the truth is that in an hour of 60 minutes, in a minute of 60 seconds. ... then the speed of the aircraft turns out like an average fast bullet \ projectile 777 m / s., Or 0,77 km / h!
                  One would like to make a riddle about whether the MIG will catch up with the bullet \ projectile fired from the gun \ machine gun, which has the same speed ??? winked
                  1. ser56
                    ser56 8 November 2019 14: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: rocket757
                    having the same speed ??

                    will not catch up, because of air resistance a bullet or a shell quickly lose speed ... hi
                    1. rocket757
                      rocket757 8 November 2019 16: 06
                      0
                      Quote: ser56
                      doesn’t catch up, because of the air resistance a bullet or a shell quickly lose speed

                      In principle, yes, the air resistance will quickly extinguish the speed of the bullet, it does not fly straight for a long time, and then it flops down a gentle steep path, however, the earth’s attraction.
                      We change the introductory .... machine-gun fire in aerial combat is conducted at distances of 100 meters, plus a little more, depending on the caliber of the machine gun and the power of the ammunition. So will she catch up with the plane from 100 - 300 meters?
                      1. ser56
                        ser56 9 November 2019 13: 43
                        +1
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Change the introductory

                        tsifiri is not .... bully
                        Quote: rocket757
                        How will she catch up with a plane from 100 - 300 meters?

                        1) if the speeds are equal, then no hi
                        2) the rest depends on the acceleration of the fall in the velocity of the bullet / projectile and the initial ratio of speeds and distance ... task of the 4th class - water is poured and poured into the pool ... bully
                      2. rocket757
                        rocket757 9 November 2019 13: 59
                        0
                        Equal speeds WHAT?
                        We make a clarification - this is an air battle between two flying objects that "play the game of catch-up".
                      3. ser56
                        ser56 9 November 2019 15: 13
                        0
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Making a clarification

                        announce the whole list, pzhl hi
                      4. rocket757
                        rocket757 9 November 2019 17: 15
                        0
                        Two planes fly at the same speed, one after the other at a distance of 100 ... 300 meters. Catching up fires a machine gun. The initial velocity of a bullet is equal to the speed of aircraft. Catch a bullet catching up with a plane?
                      5. ser56
                        ser56 9 November 2019 18: 17
                        +1
                        no bullet braking speed ....
                      6. rocket757
                        rocket757 9 November 2019 18: 32
                        0
                        Airplanes fly in air / gas. In an airless space, planes do not fly ... not a pepelats all the same.
                      7. ser56
                        ser56 9 November 2019 18: 48
                        +1
                        Quote: rocket757
                        not pepelats all the same.

                        under the indicated conditions, aircraft can be considered standing, so the relative movement of the bullet will be almost the same when the aircraft shoot standing in the lane ... the bullet will catch up hi
                        Of course, if the scope is correctly taken request
                      8. rocket757
                        rocket757 9 November 2019 20: 52
                        0
                        Logical and correct.
                        Children have such math in school !!! On the floor guesses instead of clear logic and common sense! ..... sometimes I get into a stupor, from a modern program, textbooks.
                      9. ser56
                        ser56 10 November 2019 13: 23
                        0
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Children have such math in school !!

                        it is more a physics - relativity of motion and coordinate system ... hi
                      10. rocket757
                        rocket757 10 November 2019 19: 45
                        0
                        Quote: ser56
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Children have such math in school !!

                        it is more a physics - relativity of motion and coordinate system ... hi

                        Mine hasn’t reached physics yet .... I suppose that there too many surprises await me.
                      11. ser56
                        ser56 11 November 2019 14: 27
                        0
                        Quote: rocket757
                        multiple surprise

                        of course - if the plane is flying at 2M, the projectile has 2,5M at the exit from the barrel, then the absolute speed is already 4,5M - braking like a hypersound .... request
                      12. rocket757
                        rocket757 11 November 2019 17: 32
                        +1
                        This is an ideal task in which many factors must be taken into account!
                        Air density i.e. flight altitude, braking surface area, i.e. caliber and shape of the projectile / bullet, etc.
                        Not a solution for asking, the interest was, would someone want to be interested in the task?
                      13. ser56
                        ser56 12 November 2019 12: 36
                        +2
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Not a solution for asking, the interest was, would someone want to be interested in the task?

                        I think the problem has already been solved, but the solutions are marked ... request
                      14. rocket757
                        rocket757 12 November 2019 12: 40
                        0
                        Quote: ser56
                        I think the problem has already been solved, but the solutions are marked ...

                        I don't think they survive so much under the "stamp". The introductory conditions are somewhat different, but the problem was solved back in that First World War!
                      15. ser56
                        ser56 12 November 2019 13: 31
                        +1
                        I believe you are mistaken, the task of firing at speeds of more than 2M arose in the late 50s ... hi
                      16. rocket757
                        rocket757 12 November 2019 13: 49
                        0
                        Quote: ser56
                        The task of firing at speeds of more than 2M arose in the late 50s ...

                        I will not say anything, I did not look very deep into the topic.
                        In theory, there are no big differences, but in fact, you need to understand.
                        In any case, the task was not of applied value, purely for interest.
                      17. ser56
                        ser56 12 November 2019 14: 12
                        +1
                        Quote: rocket757
                        In theory, there are no big differences,

                        the flow around depends on the flow rate, and there are qualitative leaps ... hi
                      18. rocket757
                        rocket757 12 November 2019 14: 33
                        0
                        It is necessary to read, remember, it was painfully long ago, about something like that, I solved the problems.
              2. Fantazer911
                Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 58
                -11
                You re-read the article, do the analysis and after the conclusions, and not whip up, the article says 2800 km / h and not otherwise, and if this speed is divided by one hour, then 46.6 km / min
                If 2800: 3600 = 0.777 m / s and what is wrong? Maths!
                0.777 × 60 = 46.62, double-check yourself before hitting the cons!
                1. Crash_117
                  Crash_117 8 November 2019 11: 02
                  +3
                  You first re-read your koment before you call all the Tolerasts.
                  1. Fantazer911
                    Fantazer911 8 November 2019 11: 09
                    -3
                    He did not call Tolerasts!
                    But tolerant, yes, referring to your attacks and tacit consent!
                  2. Oyo Sarkazmi
                    Oyo Sarkazmi 8 November 2019 11: 10
                    0
                    Even such a plane would fly from Saturn !!! In ours do.
                    But with the dimensions of a comrade serious problems. Because, if you believe its numbers, the MiG-31 can fly from Saturn, but it moves more slowly than a pedestrian (1m / s = 3,6 km per hour).
                2. Charik
                  Charik 8 November 2019 12: 59
                  0
                  2800km divided into 60 minutes - got a speed of 46km per minute
                3. Piramidon
                  Piramidon 8 November 2019 13: 26
                  0
                  Quote: Fantazer911
                  If 2800: 3600 = 0.777 m / s and what is wrong?

                  What you divide kilometers (2800km/ hour), and you get meters (0.777 м/ sec) how so? Take the speed in meters per hour and divide by the number of seconds per hour. Those.
                  2800000: 3600 = 777,77 m / s. or 0,777 km / s. Arithmetic 5th grade.
                4. Vlad.by
                  Vlad.by 8 November 2019 15: 19
                  +2
                  If 2800: 3600 = 0.777 m / s and what is wrong? Maths!

                  So in this statement again a mistake!
                  Don't be friends with orders.
                  0,777 KM per second, but not M / s
                5. tovarich-andrey.62goncharov
                  tovarich-andrey.62goncharov 8 November 2019 21: 49
                  0
                  770 m / s, not 0,77 m / s ... Somehow.
            2. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny 8 November 2019 12: 48
              +1
              Divide by another 60, then it will be per second. You are being hinted at.
          2. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 41
            -13
            Here come the tolerant minus signers, mathematicians in one word hi
            1. Crash_117
              Crash_117 8 November 2019 10: 50
              -4
              It is better to be an educated, tolerant minus signer than a brainless cheers patriot who puts a plus sign on everything about Russian.
              1. Fantazer911
                Fantazer911 8 November 2019 11: 03
                -8
                Well, yes, you are one smart and foolish fools, re-read the article carefully
              2. kapitan92
                kapitan92 8 November 2019 12: 03
                +4
                Quote: Crash_117
                Better to be an educated, tolerant minus signer than a brainless cheers patriot,

                laughing laughing good I immediately remembered. "Better a revolutionary syphilitic than a healthy counter-revolutionary!" "Optimistic Tragedy".
              3. Vlad.by
                Vlad.by 8 November 2019 15: 27
                -1
                Well, if you were "educated", you would put a hyphen between URA and PATRIOT.
                And so, I'm sorry, but you seem to be just critical, and nothing more!
                I can not judge about brainlessness - the actual material is not enough, though, the presentation style
                and the nickname with the number from the designation of the failed iron - rather correspond.
                1. Crash_117
                  Crash_117 8 November 2019 17: 08
                  -5
                  If you did not know that the slogan URAPATRIOT is intentionally written together, this is a kind of rofl, these are your problems. And if the number 117 brings to mind only F-117, this again, only your problems.
                  1. Vlad.by
                    Vlad.by 8 November 2019 17: 51
                    0
                    I don't care about your "rofl" (this is, apparently, rushing out of education ??) and your nickname - do not care, by and large, from the high bell tower.
                    Your nickname, your rofl - your problems too.
                    But the rules of the Russian language have not been canceled yet. And their observance shows education. Including.
                    Learn, "you are our educated" ...
                    1. Vlad.by
                      Vlad.by 8 November 2019 17: 54
                      -1
                      By the way, the word "pro-Russian" - on the contrary, is written together))
                    2. Crash_117
                      Crash_117 8 November 2019 21: 10
                      -5
                      I don’t care for the nickname, but for the number 117 the trigger worked, which automatically indicates your bias towards everything Western. And as usual in the classics, if there is nothing to answer, always jump to spelling - swim, we know.
                      1. Vlad.by
                        Vlad.by 12 November 2019 10: 56
                        0
                        117 is a number, sorry. Not a number.
                        How exactly is a "trigger" able to work on a "digit" ??
                        As for the bias towards everything Western - it is curious how one can not be biased towards a specific iron, which was quickly removed from service immediately after the failure of a broad advertising company?
                        I would be very happy if this prodigy continued to occupy a place in the hangars of a potential enemy.
            2. Crash_117
              Crash_117 8 November 2019 11: 12
              0
              Someone else has problems with math. I can not... crying
          3. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 49
            -6
            In a second actually
          4. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 11: 05
            +3
            Yes a minute
        4. lwxx
          lwxx 8 November 2019 10: 30
          +5
          You have trouble with arithmetic. 0,777 per second. In an hour of 3600 seconds. hi
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Fantazer911
            Fantazer911 8 November 2019 10: 46
            -8
            And per second, the article says per hour
            1. Crash_117
              Crash_117 8 November 2019 10: 54
              0
              In one hour 3600 seconds.
              46.6 * 3600 = 167 760 km per hour according to your calculations.
            2. Sky strike fighter
              Sky strike fighter 8 November 2019 11: 06
              0
              3600 km / h = 60km / min = 1km / s = 3 Mach. This is based on 3600 km / h.
              Quote: Fantazer911
              And per second, the article says per hour
        5. Izotovp
          Izotovp 8 November 2019 10: 33
          +6
          Absolutely real.
          That's right, like this: 2800 km / h: 3,6 = 777,78 m / s.
    2. Dmitry Potapov
      Dmitry Potapov 8 November 2019 10: 32
      0
      Per minute. Slightly mistaken.
      1. vanavatny
        vanavatny 8 November 2019 10: 41
        +13
        fellow citizens, I feel among you an effective manager, courage no worse than Rosstat laughing
        1. Dmitry Potapov
          Dmitry Potapov 8 November 2019 11: 15
          +1
          What does courage have to do with it? I just corrected the person who was a little mistaken with hot! As for management, I am very far from this profession.
          1. vanavatny
            vanavatny 8 November 2019 11: 36
            +2
            I'm not about you, good man hi : just, in the morning I looked, and here laughing
        2. Revival
          Revival 9 November 2019 00: 52
          0
          )))))))))))))))) +++++ ×
    3. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 8 November 2019 10: 40
      +6
      Quote: Fantazer911
      at a decent speed of 46.6 km per second

      Such even a space rocket cannot achieve. Only after a bunch of gravitational maneuvers. And in the atmosphere in general, it will turn into plasma instantly. However, in school physics comes after arithmetic ...
      1. Moskovit
        Moskovit 8 November 2019 11: 01
        +4
        I remember at the institute they calculated the rate of penetration of a coal combine in the mine. One of our girls came out 400 meters per second. The teacher tells her - this is supersonic! She, slamming her eyes - so it turned out according to my calculations!
        But everyone forgave her, she was very beautiful, but at the men's faculty).
        1. Avis-bis
          Avis-bis 8 November 2019 11: 10
          +3
          Quote: Moskovit
          beautiful, but at the men's faculty).

          Oh yes, this is an eternal theme. :) In "my" alma mater there was no blended learning, but a friend who studied in construction, told how in their practice in geodesy the girls got a 15% slope at the level of the railway station. :)
    4. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 8 November 2019 11: 00
      +4
      Quote: Fantazer911
      Handsome, a successful interceptor with a decent speed of 46.6 km per second

      At such a speed, you can accidentally fly outside the solar system ...
      1. Avis-bis
        Avis-bis 8 November 2019 11: 11
        +1
        Quote: Captain Pushkin
        Quote: Fantazer911
        Handsome, a successful interceptor with a decent speed of 46.6 km per second

        At such a speed, you can accidentally fly outside the solar system ...

        Nope, it doesn’t shine on the plane - at such a speed the atmosphere will really turn into the firmament of heaven, about which it will split into atoms. :)
    5. Sentinel-vs
      Sentinel-vs 8 November 2019 11: 03
      +2
      The second cosmic velocity for the Earth = 11,2 km / s. A body reaching this speed leaves the limits of Earth's gravity.
      And about the same speed as you indicated = 48 km / s was developed by the Galileo apparatus, which went to Jupiter.
      1. Fantazer911
        Fantazer911 8 November 2019 11: 06
        +3
        Wrong in a minute
        1. lucul
          lucul 8 November 2019 11: 32
          +2
          Wrong in a minute

          Come on, forget it. It happens to everyone .
          1. Captain Pushkin
            Captain Pushkin 8 November 2019 16: 31
            0
            Quote: lucul
            Wrong in a minute

            Come on, forget it. It happens to everyone .

            Once my kitten slept next to me on the couch, and when he woke up, he realized that he didn’t reach the toilet (he went to the toilet), rushed about in search, saw an empty shoebox and pushed into it. I reproached him: "What are you, Vaska, a grown man and suddenly such an incident?" (And the "guy" was 3 months old) The kitten sat on its hind legs in the corridor, bowed its head and sits for 5 minutes, 10, 15 ...
            That seems to be enough. I told him: "Okay, Vaska, who does not happen to ..." Immediately the kitten came to life and cheered up.
            I hope that our frowning interlocutor will come to life a little after your comfort.
    6. Fantazer911
      Fantazer911 8 November 2019 11: 07
      +1
      Error per minute
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 8 November 2019 11: 36
        +2
        QUESTION - will a bullet \ shell catch up with a speed of the same 777 m / s MIG flying at a speed of 2800 km \ hour ???
        There are no leading questions, but clarifications are welcome.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 8 November 2019 13: 37
        -1
        Quote: Fantazer911
        Error per minute

        Finally! And then, thanks to you, a bunch of illiterate "tolerant minus players" have already appeared, to whom one could apologize.
    7. Ros 56
      Ros 56 8 November 2019 13: 25
      0
      Per minute just right, about 2800 per hour.
  5. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 8 November 2019 10: 15
    +3
    However, before its appearance, the interception of intruders and the launch of “Daggers” would be the task of MiG-31BM aircraft.
    And the MiG with the letter "K" then where, if the BM can also launch the "Dagger"?
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 8 November 2019 11: 21
      +5
      Actually, the MiG-31BM is not for the "Dagger"! This is a "long-range" interceptor ... "long-range" air-to-air missiles are the main weapon! For the "Dagger" there is a MiG-31K ... (although the first tests were carried out with the "participation" of the MiG-31BM ...) In the near future, the MiG-31D will probably be relevant for an anti-satellite missile ... MiG-31S (or MiG-31I ...) to launch satellites ... I don’t know ... is it worth mentioning the "crazy" idea of ​​launching a mini-spaceplane using the MiG-31?
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 8 November 2019 11: 41
        +4
        That's right, it was I who spun our "respected NI" for his incompetence. wink )))
        Here's a dilemma: the more "K" we have, the fewer interceptors. And this idea is not reflected in the article, as if he is a Swiss and a reaper rolled into one.
        1. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 8 November 2019 12: 08
          +4
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Here's a dilemma: the more "K" we have, the fewer interceptors. And this idea is not reflected in the article, as if he is a Swiss and a reaper rolled into one.

          I agree with you! yes
    2. Ros 56
      Ros 56 8 November 2019 13: 26
      0
      As there is never too much money, so an extra plane is never superfluous. lol
  6. kit88
    kit88 8 November 2019 11: 24
    +3
    MiG-41, which can enter the army by the end of the 20s. It is expected that this aircraft will be hypersonic and will be able to rise into the near space

    Thanks NI for the compliment. For food for publishing glossy magazines.
    And so it’s good that they sent the MiG to the near space, which means that it will not need a second space speed, it’s easier for the designers. And in the troops by the end of the 20s. Wow, how Russians will defeat everyone, fear everyone, hands up!
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 8 November 2019 12: 34
      +1
      The main thing is that work on the creation of the Mig-41 is underway.
      “The PAK DP project is at the development stage,” said Tarasenko.

      He also noted that the new fighter will have to replace the MiG-31, whose life cycle will end in 10 years, after which he will need a replacement. This replacement will be the new PAK DP aircraft, which is also called the MiG-41.
      According to TASS, earlier the beginning of development work on the creation of a new interceptor was announced by the former Commander of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) of the Russian Federation, Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security Viktor Bondarev.
      Later, MiG Corporation confirmed this information, adding that in addition to the manned version of this aircraft, the creation of an unmanned vehicle that can perform combat missions even in outer space is also being considered.

      https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2018/08/18/mig-41-rossiyskaya-korporaciya-sozdaet-perehvatchik-novogo-pokoleniya
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 8 November 2019 11: 35
    +1
    Russian VKS have big plans for MiG-31 interceptors, write the American media.

    Who cares about "our plans"? “This is our cow and we milk it!” “Lethal Force” is a Russian television detective series based on the works of Andrey Kivinov.
  8. gregor6549
    gregor6549 8 November 2019 13: 13
    +1
    MIG 31 was created at one time to detect and intercept air attack weapons of a potential enemy over those regions of the USSR where there were large gaps in the country's radar field. For this, the MIG 31 was equipped with a very decent airborne radar and air-to-air missiles at that time. In addition, the fighter received data transmission equipment allowing it to exchange its radar information with the same fighters. This allowed a link of 3 fighters scattered along the front to create the so-called. flying radar field up to 400 km wide (I don't remember the exact numbers because of old age and the accompanying sclerosis. Moreover, during the tests, the MIG31's ability to work on low-flying targets of the "Ax" type as well as on satellites was revealed. participation in the creation of a ground-based complex for control automation of this fighter, for which a number of employees of our enterprise were awarded state awards and prizes of the USSR, i.e. the machine turned out to be a very worthy interceptor of the country's air defense.
    Now, in addition to interception tasks, they are trying to impose on its steel shoulders the tasks of the "Dagger" carrier aircraft, i.e. one single missile, after the launch of which the MIG31 becomes unarmed. In addition, MIG31 has traditionally been part of fighter aviation, and with the Dagger, it seems to be organizationally part of long-range aviation, And whatever one may say, there are two different subspecies of aviation (albeit as part of the same aerospace forces), which differ in both tactics of use and methods pilot training and much more. How beneficial it is with a limited number of MiG31 in the VKS is a big question. Maybe it would be easier to equip the Daggers with acceleration stages and equip them with long-range aircraft TU160, TU95, etc.?
    What do citizens think experts?
    1. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 8 November 2019 15: 48
      +2
      Quote: gregor6549
      link of 3 fighters

      Four.
      800-1000km according to advertising data.
      the carrier of the "Dagger", i.e. one single missile, after the launch of which the MIG31 becomes unarmed.

      ... like the Tu-22, for example.
      no matter how you twist two different subspecies of aviation (albeit as part of the same aerospace forces), which differ in tactics of application, and in the methods of training pilots and many others.

      F-14 fighter at sunset career also managed to visit the IS.
      equip daggers with booster steps

      How does one exclude the other? :)
  9. Old26
    Old26 8 November 2019 13: 36
    0
    Quote: rocket757
    But the truth is that in an hour of 60 minutes, in a minute of 60 seconds. ... then the speed of the aircraft turns out like an average fast bullet \ projectile 777 m / s., Or 0,77 km / h!

    Victor! 777 m / s is not 0,77 km / h. It is 0,77 km / s

    Quote: Fantazer911
    You re-read the article, do the analysis and after the conclusions, and not whip up, the article says 2800 km / h and not otherwise, and if this speed is divided by one hour, then 46.6 km / min
    If 2800: 3600 = 0.777 m / s and what is wrong? Maths!
    0.777 × 60 = 46.62, double-check yourself before hitting the cons!

    Namesake! do not get into the bottle if you are not right. Everything is considered very simple. The conversion of km / h to m / s is obtained by dividing the speed in km / h by 3,6. As a result, we get 777, (7) m / s. Divide not by 3600, but by 3,6.
    You just need to present the speed of 2800 km / h first in the form of speed m / h, and this is 2 800 000 m / h. If then this value is divided by 3600 (the number of seconds per hour), we obtain the desired 777 m / s.

    Quote: rocket757
    QUESTION - will a bullet \ shell catch up with a speed of the same 777 m / s MIG flying at a speed of 2800 km \ hour ???
    There are no leading questions, but clarifications are welcome.

    The speed of the MIG is not 777 m / s, but 777,78 m / s. if a bullet flies at a speed of exactly 777, then it will not catch up. Of course, if at the same time they didn’t shoot from the same MIG going at such a speed laughing
    1. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 8 November 2019 15: 52
      +3
      Quote: Old26

      The speed of the MIG is not 777 m / s, but 777,78 m / s. if a bullet flies at a speed of exactly 777, then it will not catch up. Of course, if at the same time they didn’t shoot from the same MIG going at such a speed laughing

      If only from a distance of tens of meters. At greater - the projectile will begin to catastrophically lose speed. The gun, even in a three-swing aircraft, is designed for relatively low speeds.
  10. bars1
    bars1 8 November 2019 15: 49
    0
    Quote: gregor6549
    It might be easier to equip daggers with booster steps and equip them with airplanes

    Rumor has it that Daggers want to arm the Tu-22M3 ...
  11. egor1712
    egor1712 8 November 2019 16: 34
    -1
    Afraid of poverty and fear. We still have gifts for you.
  12. 7,62x54
    7,62x54 8 November 2019 21: 26
    +1
    Characteristics of mig31 meet the requirements of reality, mig41 in the future will be launched into production. When will effective managers come up with something new. and not eat up the remains of a great heritage.
  13. Chaldon48
    Chaldon48 9 November 2019 00: 17
    +1
    So speed and altitude are relevant in our days.
  14. storm
    storm 9 November 2019 04: 27
    -1
    . The latter has recently been used for carrying dagger aeroballistic missiles. 12-16 aircraft with such weapons have been on duty in the Black Sea since the middle of last year.

    The main question is why at least missile-bearing regiments in the Northern and Pacific fleets have not yet been restored?
    Now none of the fleets is able to withstand the fleets of the United States, Japan or Euro-NATO, even for several hours of active hostilities, and given the complexity of the transfer of naval forces from one fleet to another due to the huge distances, the complexity of navigation and control by the "enemy" of all strategically important straits, inter-naval maneuver of forces is virtually impossible.

    To create a balance of forces in the North and East of Russia, it is necessary to form powerful strike groups in the form of two missile-carrying air divisions armed with the Dagger complex.
    The missile division should include two MiG-31K regiments + Tu-22M3M "Dagger" regiment.

    To provide air cover for Pacific Fleet and Northern Fleet, it is necessary to form two more fighter air divisions in each of which there are two Su-30SM regiments and one MiG-31BM regiment.
    The Su-30SM can also be carriers of the new Onix-M anti-ship missiles with a range of 800 km and are able to form another defense line or be used to destroy less significant targets for which it is too expensive to spend dagger missiles.
  15. Old26
    Old26 9 November 2019 10: 22
    -2
    Quote: assault
    To create a balance of forces in the North and East of Russia, it is necessary to form powerful strike groups in the form of two missile-carrying air divisions armed with the Dagger complex.
    The missile division should include two MiG-31K regiments + Tu-22M3M "Dagger" regiment.

    As a result, there will be almost no MIG-31 interceptors in the Aerospace Forces, and there will be no TU-22M3 bombers. All of them will be used with the "Daggers", and if necessary, we will drive the Barmaley either the SU-25, if they remain, or the SU-34 maximum