In the US, evaluated the project of the new Russian transport "Elephant"

42
Russia showed the aerodynamic model of the Elephant transport aircraft, designed to replace the old Soviet An-124 Ruslan. The new aircraft has little in common with previously demonstrated developments, such as the Il-106, writes The Drive magazine.





The aircraft model 5 November showed the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI). In the near future, the model will be tested in the T-106 wind tunnel and show its flight and take-off and landing characteristics. Next year, the model will be sent to the T-102 pipe for new studies. The model can easily be rebuilt in different configurations, which will simplify its testing. In particular, now she does not have a keel - the optimal plumage pattern will be determined during the purge.

A model can have a length of about 5 feet (1,6 m) and a wing span of 6 feet (1,75) m. A steel and aluminum product can have different weights, but not more than 364 pounds (120 kg).

TsAGI does not disclose the size and weight of the future Elephant aircraft. However, it is claimed that he will be able to transport 180 tons of cargo - 60 tons more than Ruslan. The flight speed will reach 850 km / h, range - 7 thousand km. This is noticeably higher than the characteristics of the An-124.

The aircraft will receive four PD-35 engines, created on the basis of the PD-14 engine. PD-14, in turn, was developed on the basis of the PS-90 engine, widely used on several aircraft.

Outwardly, “Elephant” resembles the development of the An-124 platform. Also, foreign experts note some similarities with the American C-5. Moreover, the “Elephant” is different from the old Russian developments. It does not look much like the Il-106, previously considered a promising replacement for the An-124.

The size, weight and part of the characteristics of the "Elephant" remain unknown. However, the data from TsAGI allow us to draw some conclusions. First of all, the declared characteristics of the new aircraft indicate that Russia wants to receive a replacement for Ruslan.

However, the Elephant project is still in its early stages. The variable configuration of the aerodynamic model indicates the search for the optimal look of the future aircraft. All its features will be determined only in the future.

However, Russia really has every reason to create its own replacement for the An-124 aircraft. At the moment, the Russian Air Force and Volga-Dnepr Airlines are operating about 35 Ruslanov engaged in various operations. Despite the small number, such a technique is of great value to Russia. However, the operation of aircraft requires the assistance of Ukraine, which has been impossible since the 2014 of the year due to the deterioration of relations between the two countries. Thus, the development of a replacement is completely logical and justified.

The TsAGI Elephant model indicates that Russian aircraft manufacturers have already taken up the issue of replacing Ruslan. At least one project of this kind has already reached research. Also, work is underway on the IL-106 - this aircraft can take off by the mid-twenties. Whether Russian industry will be able to create new technology, and what it will be, remains to be seen in the future.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    42 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      7 November 2019 10: 10
      Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...
      1. +5
        7 November 2019 10: 14
        This is not a name, but an OCD code, as well as a 4202 code for Sarmat.
        1. +3
          7 November 2019 10: 44
          4202 this is not the code "Sarmat" ...
          1. +11
            7 November 2019 12: 26
            it is alleged that he will be able to carry 180 tons of cargo - 60 tons more than Ruslan

            Syria has shown how much an extra-heavy transporter like Ruslan is needed. Components of the S-400 were also transferred by Ruslan. Those Americans have long been convinced that the An-124, in the field of transportation, simply does not have competitors for military operations. They transported them a Patriot. Thus, superheavy allows for unique military operations anywhere in the world. And in the civilian world, he carries all unique goods. I would not want to lose this niche.
      2. 0
        7 November 2019 10: 33
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

        weak vocabulary for those who named ... we already have raptors and terminators, so the elephant has come ... "jumbo" (savannah elephant) has been flying among Americans for a long time.Boeing 747 if that.
        1. AUL
          +6
          7 November 2019 11: 07
          Quote: Aerodrome
          we already have raptors and terminators, so the elephant has come ...
          ... falkout, derivation, punisher, bug ... Ugh!
        2. +3
          7 November 2019 13: 44
          Chief of the Redskins (Nazarius): Layouts with layouts, but the name (even tentative for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

          Do you think will eat a lot? request
          And on the other hand, for export, the name is suitable - Indians respect elephants Yes
      3. +8
        7 November 2019 10: 48
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

        Normal name. Not "Toad" was called. And not Slug.

        Well, by the way, about "you will name a yacht" - an example from the sailing era:
        Oliphant is a 32-gun sailing frigate of the Russian fleet. He participated in the Northern War of 1700-1721, in 1706 and 1707 he was flagship of the Baltic Fleet.

        The choice of the name Oliphant, translated from Dutch and German as “elephant,” was to symbolize the growing strength and power of Russia, as well as the greatness of the deeds of its monarch.
        In the collection of symbols and emblems widely used in Russia, the mottos corresponded to various images of the elephant: “my strength is equal to my good deed”, “evil is evil”, “considerable strength”, “time will come”. At the ship of the same name in the Petrovsky Azov fleet, the motto indicated in the collection was “evil dashing”. The explanation of the images on the triumphal gates erected in Moscow for the meeting of Peter I and his troops on November 11, 1703, indicated that the elephant standing among the dead animals symbolizes "his tsarist ... Majesty’s strength and prosperity in the braneha"


        Flagship. Let me remind you that in the indicated period the Baltic Fleet was the only military fleet of the high sea of ​​Russia.
        1. -2
          7 November 2019 11: 39
          You have forgotten "Ferdinand" ...
          1. +2
            7 November 2019 12: 03
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            You have forgotten "Ferdinand" ...

            Do not judge others by yourself. I limited myself to a domestic example ..
            1. -3
              7 November 2019 12: 57
              Domestic example with an overseas name ....
              1. +3
                7 November 2019 14: 47
                Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                with an overseas name ....

                What's the difference? "Elephant", "elephant", "oliphant", etc in any language means the same proboscis with large ears. It was just that the time was like that, with a fashion for everything foreign, even if there were own words for the same concept. Is a brig with an overseas ambiguous name "Mercury" also a "misnamed yacht"?
                In Soviet times, aircraft types were rarely named, but they all had nicknames. The nickname "Kukuruznik" did not prevent U-2 and An-2 from becoming legends loved by many generations of aviators and not only. And great flying planes, despite the botanical awkward nickname. "Antey" (another overseas name, yeah), unlike its mythical namesake, did not lose strength, taking off from the ground, but quite the opposite. (No, I don't need to talk about the disaster with him, it's not the name that matters). The agricultural aircraft with the "frivolous" official name "The Little Humpbacked Horse" was also a good aircraft. The call sign "Cedar", according to the principle "what do you call the yacht ...", made Gagarin wooden knee-deep?
      4. -5
        7 November 2019 10: 49
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

        Creatiff from "effective managers", damn it! Though not "Cuttlefish" ...
      5. +4
        7 November 2019 13: 22
        First you need to build a yacht, and then choose a name.
        1. -1
          7 November 2019 15: 54
          The first copy of the modernized version of the IL-76 aircraft, called the IL-76MD90A, was built in December 2011, in 2012, in the presence of Putin, a contract was signed for the supply of 39 data of the Russian Air Force aircraft until 2020. The first 2 serial boards were supposed to be transferred to the Russian Air Force back in 2014. However, only on April 2, 2019, the first serial IL-76MD-90A (serial number 0109) was transferred to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

          And this is not about a new aircraft from scratch, for which the engine is still only planned to be developed by 2025. This is just a deep modernization, with the installation of engines that have been serially produced for 30 years. I am sure that with such a pace of work in the Russian aviation industry, only a few of those who write comments here now and consider the chosen name for this layout unsuccessful will survive until the first flight of this "Elephant" ...
      6. -3
        7 November 2019 17: 18
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

        No need to panic, Nazarius. IS ALWAYS in our country, the preliminary developments of many military equipment were designated with conventional ciphers.
      7. 0
        13 November 2019 11: 07
        Aircraft loving awesome loads ...
    2. +1
      7 November 2019 10: 15
      Well, Ukrainians spit on copyrights (what the whole country did in the union, they attributed to themselves), so that we don’t spit on their already ex-An and make their slightly modernized copy? One figs for their VKS and not for sale, Yes, and flights to other countries of military transport with escort is often forbidden.
      1. -1
        7 November 2019 10: 50
        Quote: evgen1221
        Well, Ukrainians spit on copyrights (what the whole country did in the union, they attributed to themselves)

        Only all svidomity at the kitchen level in all sorts of FB and other consumer goods dormitories.
    3. +2
      7 November 2019 10: 19
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Layouts are layouts, but the name (even preliminary for the layout) is already losing. What do you call a yacht ...

      this is the preliminary name, the same with the UAV Hunter, where Hunter is a technology demonstrator and the name of the program, and nobody knows what the final drone itself will be called
    4. +2
      7 November 2019 10: 55
      The article is called:
      In the USA, they evaluated the project new Russian transport "Elephant"

      We read further:
      Russia showed ... TsAGI does not disclose ... data from TsAGI allow ... data from TsAGI allow ...

      And from the estimates of US specialists:
      ... foreign experts note some similarities with the American C-5 ... operation of the aircraft requires the assistance of Ukraine ... Russian aircraft manufacturers have already taken up the issue of replacing Ruslan ...

      And the apotheosis of the article:
      Whether Russian industry will be able to create new technology, and what it will be, remains to be seen in the future.

      How glorious it was before - Russian hunters shared the skin of an unbroken Russian bear ... Now, it turns out, when sharing, we need to take into account the opinion of foreign experts ...
      You know, something in such articles is annoying: either an inexhaustible topic of plans for the future, or an adequate replacement of those for life in the country, which Russia simply needs in terms of neighborhood ...
    5. 0
      7 November 2019 11: 36
      The model may have a length of about 5 feet (1,6 m) and a wingspan of 6 feet (1,75) m. A steel and aluminum product may have different weights, but no more than 364 pounds (120 kg).
      And that TsAGI is already moving to the English system of measures? Probably for foreigners, so that they don’t break their heads when translating centimeters and grams to their native one.
      1. 0
        7 November 2019 12: 20
        Quote: rotmistr60
        And that TsAGI is already moving to the English system of measures? Probably for foreigners, so that they don’t break their heads when translating centimeters and grams to their native one.

        The author of the article clearly simply translated the English-language article. TsAGI has nothing to do with it. All metric values ​​are a multiple of five or ten, unlike foot data.
    6. 0
      7 November 2019 11: 45
      Why look at everything in the USA ?! Keep your course and that's it.
      One thing only bothers me is the situation with the PD-35. What is known does not raise hopes, everything is far from the declared parameters. I apologize for my personal opinion, but there is something wrong in the design and manufacturing process. Rather, in the manufacturing process. Maybe they will, but when? And again, I apologize for pessimism, maybe not justified.
      1. 0
        7 November 2019 12: 21
        UEC-Aviadvigatel JSC puts forward the development of the PD-35 turbofan engine as the preferred engine for the CR929 Russian-Chinese wide-body airliner. China and Russia signed a memorandum of cooperation to create an engine ...
        Those. the situation is similar to the Indian-Russian one with the SU-57 and MiG-35 ... We are waiting for funding from the Chinese negative
        1. +1
          7 November 2019 12: 29
          We do not expect funding, we finance the development of PD-35 ourselves, just as we finance the development of Product 30 (a 2-stage engine) for the Su-57, without Indians. As far as I know, the Chinese decided to make their own analogue PD-35.
          1. +1
            7 November 2019 12: 35
            Well, not really, funding is allocated until 2020 ... we followed the "proven" path first to create at our own expense (as happened with the SU-57), and then try to enter the market, again like with the SU-57 ...

            China wants to pull the blanket over itself and announces the AEF3500. This engine can only be installed on the Russian-Chinese CR929, because neither Boeing nor Airbus will buy it.
            It is doubtful that China will be able to bring its engine to mind. It is impossible to take a leap in technology without going through all the previous stages (that is, creating a successful engine with less traction).
            Perhaps that is why Beijing decided to buy a Ukrainian Motor Sich - Soviet secrets and technologies can be bought almost like on a sale.
            Of course, all this will be framed as friendly competition with Russia. A "double" version is also possible - for some aircraft there will be a Chinese engine, for others PD-35.

            In any case, China is making an application for great technological success and it is still difficult to say what will happen in the end.
            1. +1
              7 November 2019 13: 00
              A "double" version is also possible - for some aircraft there will be a Chinese engine, for others PD-35.

              Most likely it will be so. Friendship is friendship, but tobacco is apart. PD-35 is needed for IL-96-400M, IL-476, IL-478 to get away from 4 engine circuits and withstand fuel economy conditions. For the same Elephant on Ruslan’s replacement. Well and PD-35 is the future of Russian engine building. It is an opportunity to gain new competencies. In the D-18T Series 3, the thrust in my opinion is less than 30 tons. This is the limit.
              On financing.
              Moscow. August 9. INTERFAX.RU - The state is allocating $ 3 billion to create a PD-35 high-thrust aircraft engine for a projected wide-body aircraft. This was announced by the managing director, general designer of JSC "UEC-Aviadvigatel" Alexander Inozemtsev to journalists on Friday.

              https://www.interfax.ru/russia/672167
              1. +2
                7 November 2019 13: 45
                To be precise, it’s not 3 million, but 180 billion rubles ... drinks
      2. 0
        7 November 2019 12: 50
        Quote: L-39NG
        I apologize for pessimism, maybe not justified.

        They say a pessimist is a well-informed optimist. The question is, where can the PD-35 be used now ... when will the new "carriers" be ready, the remotorization of the old ones ...
        1. +2
          7 November 2019 13: 08
          The question is, where can PD-35 be used now ... when will new "carriers" be ready, remotorization of old ones ...

          It will allow you to get away from the four-engine scheme on the IL-476, IL-478, IL-96-400, PAK TA Elephant and the latest Russian-Chinese wide-body. In general, without the PD-35, none of our wide-body can be competitive and even domestic carriers will not be without PD-35 to purchase such aircraft.
    7. 0
      7 November 2019 11: 55
      That’s as soon as we’ll praise / scold. I stopped playing modelki long ago ...
    8. 0
      7 November 2019 13: 23
      4xPD35 will turn out cool ... it’s more traction than Mriya’s
    9. +1
      7 November 2019 13: 54
      News from Warzone, plus an interview with the chief designer of PJSC "IL" Nikolai Talikov
      1. 0
        8 November 2019 12: 10
        IL-106 is up to 100 tons (80 without overload), and according to the replacement order AN-124, a load capacity of 150-180 tons is required.
    10. +1
      7 November 2019 14: 33
      And they could have called Mammoth .. There used to be a lot of them running across our north ...
    11. -4
      7 November 2019 15: 38
      For 30 years, not a single aircraft engine has been created, the "cornman" has also been "mutilated" for 30 years, never created, even the heritage of the already developed samples has not been brought to mind, although there were enough enthusiastic screams about "breakthroughs", but not a single liner was so crazy brought, and we fly on binges and airbuses, then the Americans interfere, then fleas are wound up, and now "bad dancers", but they have successfully ditched more than one legendary design bureau and Soviet aviation engineering school, and now they sent "stooltkin" to Everything, the legacy of the "dark and bloody Soviet regime" ends, as well as creatively thinking talented engineers and designers trained and brought up by the "totalitarian regime", and who received educational services, egesh "advanced consumers" without honor and conscience, with a bright and Democratic liberalism is only capable of carving up and selling power, but with creativity and professionalism, it is somehow tense. For some reason I will not be surprised that all this in 5-10 years will turn out to be zilch, but the cry Eastern neighbors or overseas "partners" are developing ideas in metal, as has happened more than once over the past 30 years.
      1. 0
        7 November 2019 17: 39
        A lot of text
    12. 0
      7 November 2019 18: 02
      In the photo there is a grave. It is just right to recall the words of A.N. Tupolev: Only beautiful planes fly.
    13. -1
      7 November 2019 18: 56
      Quote: 16112014nk
      In the photo there is a grave. It is just right to recall the words of A.N. Tupolev: Only beautiful planes fly.

      Aa it's not a plane yet
    14. 0
      7 November 2019 19: 17
      And where is the tail of the model?
      1. +1
        7 November 2019 21: 53
        Quote: capsid
        And where is the tail of the model?

        Is it too lazy to read the article?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"