Opponents of the legalization of "gunshot" have new arguments after the shooting of the military in Transbaikalia
For tomorrow, November 6, a meeting is scheduled between Salim Shamsutdinov and his son, who is in the pre-trial detention center as the main person involved in the case of the shooting of servicemen in one of the parts of Transbaikalia.
Recall that we are talking about the drama that unfolded in the military unit 25 on October, when a conscript soldier Ramil Shamsutdinov shot 8 other soldiers of the same unit, including two officers. Two more were injured and were sent to the hospital.
Salim Shamsutdinov previously commented on the description of his son, published with reference to the investigation, which states that during the service he was conflicted, aggressive, intolerant of forms of subordination. The father of the serviceman Shamsutdinov said that all this does not correlate with the nature of his son and that in a strange way, no commission revealed any aggressive signs of behavior in his son before he was called up for military service. Recall that earlier Shamsutdinov Jr. applied for admission to the military school.
The very case of the shooting of servicemen in Transbaikalia became the reason for new conversations about whether it makes sense to legalize gunshot weapons in Russia. Opponents of legalization of the so-called "short-barrel" use the described case for their own purposes. In particular, it is noted that if a soldier who has the right to carry firearms, who has passed a number of medical commissions, can rip off the roof, then in the civilian environment there will be many dubious individuals who will have access to weapons, and when in their heads “Something closes”, they also decide to use it immediately - for example, against offenders or those with whose opinion they disagree.
A case in Transbaikalia is used by opponents of the legalization of the “short-barreled” and in terms of this kind of logic: other military personnel, including officers, also had weapons, but the moment for the actual execution was chosen in such a way that they simply could not dispose of it - played a role surprise factor. Representatives of the side of the opponents of the legalization of short-barreled weapons in Russia continue the idea: if citizens have the opportunity to keep weapons at home, does this mean that in case of an emergency they will have time to dispose of them for self-defense?
Meanwhile, the investigation into the high-profile case of the massacre of servicemen in Transbaikalia continues.
Recall that we are talking about the drama that unfolded in the military unit 25 on October, when a conscript soldier Ramil Shamsutdinov shot 8 other soldiers of the same unit, including two officers. Two more were injured and were sent to the hospital.
Salim Shamsutdinov previously commented on the description of his son, published with reference to the investigation, which states that during the service he was conflicted, aggressive, intolerant of forms of subordination. The father of the serviceman Shamsutdinov said that all this does not correlate with the nature of his son and that in a strange way, no commission revealed any aggressive signs of behavior in his son before he was called up for military service. Recall that earlier Shamsutdinov Jr. applied for admission to the military school.
The very case of the shooting of servicemen in Transbaikalia became the reason for new conversations about whether it makes sense to legalize gunshot weapons in Russia. Opponents of legalization of the so-called "short-barrel" use the described case for their own purposes. In particular, it is noted that if a soldier who has the right to carry firearms, who has passed a number of medical commissions, can rip off the roof, then in the civilian environment there will be many dubious individuals who will have access to weapons, and when in their heads “Something closes”, they also decide to use it immediately - for example, against offenders or those with whose opinion they disagree.
A case in Transbaikalia is used by opponents of the legalization of the “short-barreled” and in terms of this kind of logic: other military personnel, including officers, also had weapons, but the moment for the actual execution was chosen in such a way that they simply could not dispose of it - played a role surprise factor. Representatives of the side of the opponents of the legalization of short-barreled weapons in Russia continue the idea: if citizens have the opportunity to keep weapons at home, does this mean that in case of an emergency they will have time to dispose of them for self-defense?
Meanwhile, the investigation into the high-profile case of the massacre of servicemen in Transbaikalia continues.
Information