Cooper: Russia prevents the United States from selling advanced weapons to other countries by palmming it with C-400

113
Russia seeks to impose its C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to the whole world, thereby preventing the United States from supplying its “advanced weapons”. This statement was made by US Assistant Secretary of State for Political Affairs Clark Cooper.

Cooper: Russia prevents the United States from selling advanced weapons to other countries by palmming it with C-400




Speaking at a briefing in Washington, Cooper said Russia was trying to impose its C-400 anti-aircraft system on other countries, thereby depriving the United States of its ability to supply "advanced weapons." He compared the C-400 with a Kalashnikov assault rifle, which the Soviet Union distributed to different countries with the goal of organizing various rebel movements.

A long way has been traveled since the AK-47 became a universal symbol of the Soviet-supported rebel movements from Southeast Asia to Africa. Today, Russia is working hard to impose various versions of its C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems around the world.

Clark said, adding that Russia is interfering with the United States.

He called the times ahead “difficult” and emphasized that it would be naive to believe that other countries have no choice but to “become America’s partners,” but at the same time, Russia takes advantage of other countries ’security needs and“ palm off ”them systems like C-400 instead of "advanced American weapons."

Through targeted sales of systems such as C-400, Russia seeks to take advantage of the security needs of partners to create barriers to our ability to supply them with the most advanced defense equipment

- said Cooper.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    113 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +47
      31 October 2019 18: 20
      "The leading Patriot" - "showed" itself in Saudi Arabia.
      No one to be offended.
      1. +45
        31 October 2019 18: 25
        Cooper: Russia is preventing the United States from selling "advanced weapons" to other countries by slipping them the S-400

        I would say it differently: Russia is preventing the United States from slipping "advanced weapons" to other countries by selling them the S-400! Yes
        1. +67
          31 October 2019 18: 37
          I wonder who paid Cooper how much for such a great S-400 ad.
          Compare the S-400 with a Kalashnikov assault rifle. Ease of use, reliability, efficiency - in terms of the combination of parameters, Kalash is unsurpassed.
          Now Cooper also works for us ... what
          1. +16
            31 October 2019 18: 48
            They are completely impoverished and all from impunity and the former without alternative.
            1. +12
              31 October 2019 19: 50
              Russia is doing everything right! If you want not to be "democratized", buy the S-400!
              1. +8
                31 October 2019 21: 53
                Russia not only does, but also helps to sort out its internal problems, which infuriates the United States and its grunting ones.
              2. +10
                31 October 2019 23: 14
                I still can’t understand whether they are mocking or are they really so fucking? Well, how can this be stated at the state level ?? Damn, there are no normal words ...
                1. +3
                  1 November 2019 07: 40
                  maxim947 (Maxim) Yesterday, 23: 14 NEW
                  +4
                  I still can not understand they are mocking or actually so fucking?

                  You can cast aside doubts - REALLY. wink
            2. +3
              31 October 2019 21: 18
              "Advanced weapons" ... "Advanced American weapons" ....
              You need to shove them in ...., and then understand what characteristics these systems must carry in order to compete with them.
              1. +1
                31 October 2019 21: 57
                Quote: Cutter
                "Advanced American Armaments"

                Sash soldier drinks
                In terms of price and unreliability, yes. wink
                1. +2
                  31 October 2019 22: 06
                  Sach soldier drinks
                  In terms of price and unreliability, yes. wink

                  In that and de hi lo, Pash! soldier They don’t know where to sell their junk already, they reached the point that they apply sanctions to their NATO ally (Turkey) in connection with the purchase of these S-400. Business and nothing personal ???? am
                  1. +2
                    31 October 2019 22: 10
                    Quote: Cutter
                    Business and nothing personal?

                    Worse: children's insults that they don’t buy their garbage at exorbitant prices. Moreover, a sandbox partner. Abydna, huh? lol
                    1. +1
                      31 October 2019 22: 28
                      Sach soldier drinks
                      In terms of price and unreliability, yes. wink

                      Pasha, kindergarten there.
                      It seems so in the Holy Scriptures: "... woe to the husband, who is ruled by his wife, Woe to the city, which is ruled by everyone ..."
                      And I'm honestly glad that they are buying Russian weapons very actively. And this politician cut his image (himself and his country) by comparing S-400 and AK. This machine is recognized as the best and most massive in the world.
              2. +2
                31 October 2019 23: 15
                Even a little bit, and this Cooper would have agreed to the fact that Russia S-400 palms in the dark. hi
                1. +2
                  1 November 2019 20: 23
                  "that Russia is slipping S-400s in the dark"
                  And esche pays to take!
          2. 0
            31 October 2019 20: 22
            Quote: Shurik70
            I wonder who paid Cooper how much for such a great S-400 ad.
            Compare the S-400 with a Kalashnikov assault rifle. Ease of use, reliability, efficiency - in terms of the combination of parameters, Kalash is unsurpassed.
            Now Cooper also works for us ... what

            Harry Cooper?
            1. +2
              1 November 2019 01: 48
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              Harry Cooper?

              No, which is James Fenimore, coupled with the union of six tribes. fellow laughing
          3. 0
            31 October 2019 20: 34
            Quote: Shurik70
            I wonder who paid Cooper how much for such a great S-400 ad.

            Guess once! He managed to do it here too!
          4. -1
            31 October 2019 20: 34
            Do you think this moron will ever get it !?
          5. +3
            31 October 2019 20: 39
            Sasha, salute! soldier drinks
            Quote: Shurik70
            I wonder who paid Cooper how much for such a great S-400 ad.

            Another thing is interesting: they paid for watering shit, but it turned out advertising. Zrada? (as they say south wink )
          6. 0
            31 October 2019 22: 58
            Quote: Shurik70
            Now Cooper also works for us ...

            Cooper is ours !!!! good
          7. +2
            1 November 2019 20: 28
            "Now Cooper also works for us ..."
            It is necessary to somehow thank all the same, at least toss a hundred or something - after all, the person is trying, otherwise he will take it and keep silent ...
            And where else can you find such an advertisement! ... angry
        2. 0
          1 November 2019 02: 43
          I think there are more people who want to buy now than those to whom our leaders would like to sell them, and I think this is right, weapons are not agricultural machinery.
      2. +5
        31 October 2019 18: 27
        Russia seeks to take advantage of the needs of its security partners to create obstacles to our ability to supply them with the most advanced defense equipment

        Is he talking about democracy? laughing
      3. -15
        31 October 2019 19: 13
        Well, the S-400 in Syria showed itself "well".
        1. +7
          31 October 2019 19: 21
          Quote: Alex_You
          Well, the S-400 in Syria showed itself "well".

          Yeah. China-Turkey is next in line India ...
          1. 0
            31 October 2019 23: 00
            Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
            Quote: Alex_You
            Well, the S-400 in Syria showed itself "well".

            Yeah. China-Turkey is next in line India ...

            I think others would buy, but so far they don’t have enough money.
        2. -1
          1 November 2019 19: 24
          This is how good, do not tell? Neither the S-300 ... nor the S-400 ever ever shot down real targets. What showed something, decrypt.
      4. +1
        31 October 2019 20: 24
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        "The leading Patriot" - "showed" itself in Saudi Arabia.

        If we continue the Cooper comparisons, then the Patriot, in comparison with the S-400, is a tandoor for baking fresh cakes of the times of the origin of Islam near the fast neutron reactor (to which the Yankees couldn’t get to their advanced brain - that’s why we have fresh weapons-grade plutonium are piled up (we don’t know where to put it, more than 80 tons!), and the Yankees sort their feces to scrape together at least a dozen nuclear weapons. laughing
      5. +3
        31 October 2019 22: 26
        The funny thing is, a hundred and 400 are purely defensive weapons, and the strong defense of any countries is not interesting to the United States
      6. +2
        31 October 2019 23: 03
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        "The leading Patriot" - "showed" itself in Saudi Arabia.

        It showed itself in Turkey, where it categorically refused to fill up the planes that bombed the Parliament building and the Presidential Palace. Because of what, it was decided to purchase our weapons.
      7. -1
        1 November 2019 19: 22
        Not for the sake of self-interest .... "Patriot" has shown itself in many places .... and on the good side and not very ... and is being modernized as a result of this "showed" .... And the S-300, S-400 .. . Can you tell me where you showed yourself? Not a single real target hit EVER! It's just in fact ..... in real conditions, what happens is no one knows.
        1. D16
          0
          2 November 2019 08: 24
          Not a single downed real goal at all NEVER! It's just in fact ..... in real terms, what happens will not be known to anyone.

          Well, you won’t get away No. . Whose missiles hit an UAV or RS Grad at the approaches to Khimki are completely unimportant. The optimal means of destruction for the target is selected. But the air defense system works, which includes observation stations, and ACS, and S-400, and Torah-Shells and men with MANPADS on the shoulder most likely too. wink All this works in a complex and complements each other. That is how reliable protection of objects is ensured. And a Patriot without an air defense system is simply delicious food for a variety of air attack weapons, to which he himself carries no threat. lol
          1. -3
            2 November 2019 12: 04
            You grind and grind everything! I repeat - neither the S-300 for decades ... nor the S-400 have ever shot down a real target. Object, but you can’t cover your mouth pliz ...
            1. D16
              0
              2 November 2019 17: 06
              S-400 takes part in the interception of targets in Khimki. There are no worthy goals for her GUNs. There will be goals, earn guns. No fools yet No. .
        2. -1
          20 January 2020 19: 42
          Well, you check it. Get on a plane and go to Moscow. There, all air defense is inoperative ...
    2. +3
      31 October 2019 18: 21
      Wow Wahahaha laughing Saudis in the know. that they were equipped with advanced defense means? The front end does not hurt them now? Or not the front end ...
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 23: 07
        Quote: Jerk
        Wow Wahahaha laughing Saudis in the know. that they were equipped with advanced defense means? The front end does not hurt them now? Or not the front end ...

        And those who have sold us buy another batch of "not advanced" RD-180s!
    3. +12
      31 October 2019 18: 22
      C400 can not be compared with AK with all due respect.
      C400 is currently a unique product on the market for a number of characteristics.
      Therefore, it is in demand.
      And the US air defense systems are just a "sniff" product, absolutely suboptimal in terms of price-quality ratio.
      1. +3
        31 October 2019 18: 45
        They are only for the price of advanced, so not very.
      2. 0
        31 October 2019 20: 37
        Quote: Livonetc
        And the US air defense systems are just "sniffed" goods

        But what an advertisement, with a sign (-)!
    4. +12
      31 October 2019 18: 22
      He called the coming times "difficult" ..

      But has he never heard of a market economy and competition? Or can the States only exist in the world of a monopolist?
      1. +3
        31 October 2019 18: 24
        "And he never heard about the market economy and competition."
        Do not swear"...
        1. +5
          31 October 2019 18: 42
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          Do not swear"...

          Oh yes, you shouldn't waste your energy on the unfortunate ... They have, you know, "hard" times have come! fool
          1. 0
            31 October 2019 20: 28
            Yes, after reading the article, I also got the impression that Mr. ... how is it ... naively decided that we are all tearing off sympathy here))
          2. 0
            31 October 2019 20: 40
            Quote: Kurare
            .. They have, you know, "difficult" times have come!

            Yes, not "difficult" times, but "critical" days! They don't know what to grab onto! Either for pads, or for pills!
            1. D16
              0
              2 November 2019 08: 27
              "Critical days" pass, and this is forever laughing .
      2. 0
        31 October 2019 23: 14
        States are losing ground in arms exports. At the end of 2017, China strengthened to third place in the list of arms exporters. Sales of Chinese weapons over the past five years have increased by 40%. France may remove Russia from second place in the list of arms exporters in 2018 and come close to the United States. In connection with the signing of the largest contract with Australia for the supply of 12 submarines. And there is a lot of money - 34 billion euros.
    5. +2
      31 October 2019 18: 26
      What problems? We live during capitalism. We sell and buy and sell who for what much. A donkey loaded with gold is able to take any fortress. No? Well, if not. Then, then you don’t fit that donkey laughing Need to vary gold and explosives bully We need a balance. We didn’t keep the balance. And here is the result. They prevent you from selling, even advanced weapons!
    6. +4
      31 October 2019 18: 26
      That is, Russia needs to sell advanced US weapons? Or buy? Or do not sell your own? Or do not interfere with the sale of US weapons?
      Does he hear himself, this sacrifice of exclusivity?
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 20: 42
        Quote: Wedmak
        is this victim of exclusivity?

        Aborted "exclusivity"!
    7. 0
      31 October 2019 18: 30
      Russia takes advantage of the security needs of other countries and sells them systems such as the S-400 instead of "advanced American weapons."
      Strangely, according to the text, it turns out that Russia should buy "advanced American weapons" and sell them to other countries instead of the S-400 ... request
    8. +5
      31 October 2019 18: 31
      after reading the article I immediately remembered Lavrov’s famous phrase
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 20: 45
        Quote: Oleg kubanoid
        after reading the article I immediately remembered Lavrov’s famous phrase

        An excellent way out from under the sword of moderators! "But Lavrov said ...!
    9. 0
      31 October 2019 18: 35
      Maybe it interferes. But not "advanced weapon", but "advanced" weapon. You may be Cooper, but not Fenimore Cooper. Some kind of fool. laughing
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 20: 14
        Quote: Captive
        Some dur ak

        just don’t know what is stopping the bad dancer .... wink
        1. +1
          31 October 2019 20: 28
          Quote: Mouse
          Quote: Captive
          Some dur ak

          just don’t know what is stopping the bad dancer .... wink

          Surely he has soft-boiled oyts !?
          1. 0
            31 October 2019 20: 33
            I can’t say for sure, I didn’t check .... laughing
      2. +1
        31 October 2019 21: 23
        How do you know?
        Maybe they also charge it from the breech? laughing
    10. +3
      31 October 2019 18: 37
      “When you say, Ivan Vasilievich, the impression is that you are delusional"
      X / F "Ivan Vasilievich changes his profession"
    11. -2
      31 October 2019 18: 39
      Under Trump, Americans are not shy in expressions. In Soviet times, such non-diplomatic rudeness would have been answered with sensitive compromising materials and special operations.
      Now there is no one to answer, there is no political will.
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 20: 46
        Quote: samarin1969
        Now there is no one to answer, there is no political will.

        Everything has its time!
        1. -1
          31 October 2019 21: 02
          Quote: Tol100v
          Quote: samarin1969
          Now there is no one to answer, there is no political will.

          Everything has its time!


          Sounds like a powerless spell, not an optimistic insider.
    12. +3
      31 October 2019 18: 39
      This is called the competition guy! What does it mean that Russia "tries to impose" the S-400, we do not impose, but offer its weapons and each country makes a choice consciously and independently. The Russian Federation, unlike the United States, does not twist anyone's hands and does not threaten with sanctions, promoting its interests in the world arms market.
    13. +4
      31 October 2019 18: 43
      supply them with the most advanced means of defense

      - said Cooper.


      The funny thing is, they sincerely believe in it. lol
    14. 0
      31 October 2019 18: 43
      He called these times "difficult" and stressed that it would be naive to believe that other countries have no choice but to "become America's partners

      Simple way out:
      At the first stage, we introduce sanctions against those who buy Russian.
      At the second stage, we introduce sanctions who do not take the American.
      Well, on the third, we impose sanctions against everyone who has something against our "free democratic market"
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 18: 45
        actually it’s done ..
    15. +6
      31 October 2019 18: 46
      And where should the countries go if advanced mattresses are compared to C-400 - a stone ax compared to AK-12
      1. +4
        31 October 2019 21: 03
        Quote: stock buildbat
        And where should the countries go if advanced mattresses are compared to C-400 - a stone ax compared to AK-12

        So, they have a small choice No. , or "cutting edge development", or winked ... "color revolutions" bully democratic hanging am , and ... again offering "first-rate developments" love
    16. +1
      31 October 2019 18: 48
      After all, Iran had to sell a couple of S-400 divisions. The best advertisement for the "Triumph" - a triumph over the downed F-35 ... Yes
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 18: 54
        it will still be small .. you need to understand that in this case not only air-to-ground missiles will be used. but also a variety of electronic warfare systems .. and the number of missiles will exceed at times the possibility of Iranian air defense. there is a way out, but Iran does not have the means to do so ..
      2. D16
        0
        2 November 2019 08: 35
        Still, Iran had to sell a couple of S-400 divisions.

        If Iran wanted, it could have been sold, but they had to restore the production of S-300 PMU2 for them.
    17. +6
      31 October 2019 18: 53
      Soon, the S-400 will appear on the flags of some developing countries as a symbol of the struggle for independence!
    18. +2
      31 October 2019 18: 55
      And the Hussites generally advance the Abrams with cardboard, set fire to - they prevent them from selling ...
    19. +1
      31 October 2019 19: 06
      Kalashnikov, after many years of production and various modifications, entered the US arms market. RPG also entered. C400 may also appear in the nomenclature of marines.
    20. +3
      31 October 2019 19: 07
      The question, apparently, is also in the "bookmark". Ie, the S-400 cannot be turned off like, for example, the F-35 or the Patriot
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 19: 32
        Yes, you are right, I recall the French air defenses of Iraq, which were turned off before the "desert storm".
    21. 0
      31 October 2019 19: 11
      Turkey's example shows HOW America trades in its "advanced" weapons.

      "You don't want to take it !!!? We're coming to you." (With their own sanctions).
    22. 0
      31 October 2019 19: 13
      Cry baby cry laughing
    23. +1
      31 October 2019 19: 18
      The toad is strangling !? that Russia has pushed you on the arms market. But it’s healthy competition. "Yours was ours."
    24. +1
      31 October 2019 19: 22
      Scolded himself. What a day today, no matter what the statement is from a comedian. Did Ze infect everyone?
    25. -1
      31 October 2019 19: 29
      The Yankees are banging their legs, nobody wants to buy their shit anymore))

      What's next? Not bought and sanctioned to cover in full?
    26. +2
      31 October 2019 19: 37
      Now anyone who has a C 400 can’t just bomb it.
    27. +1
      31 October 2019 19: 40
      Well, because apparently "Patriot" and advanced technologies, these are completely different concepts.
    28. +2
      31 October 2019 19: 49
      If these means of defense were advanced, they would buy. In the US, more or less advanced means of attack. But this is only for myself, my beloved. The rest of the trash - so that they could not fight back from these same Americans. That is the problem. Russia is selling real protection against the Americans.
    29. +2
      31 October 2019 20: 13
      There is a persistent feeling that patients with Down syndrome, for some reason, were released not only outside the walls of the yellow house, but also provided them with a platform and a microphone.
      Yesterday was Greta, today is Clark Cooper.
    30. 0
      31 October 2019 20: 22
      And what kind of "advanced weapon" is this? When in Israel I asked my friend, a former special forces soldier and a Shabak soldier, what small arms they take for the action, he replied without hesitation that, according to the charter, they had the latest Galil modifications, but just before the assignment the guys left them in the barracks and took the last modifications of AK. He says that "... even you have such things not everywhere in Russia ... if you want to live, take AK". And when I asked about the armament of their patrols on the streets of M-16, he just neighing: "... we often guard this junk during unloading. The cost per piece, you will not believe, is $ 4 ... !!!" FOUR DOLLARS !!! They get it straight from the States. And often used ... It is impossible to shoot from it, but it psychologically affects the crowd ...
    31. -2
      31 October 2019 20: 26
      Yes, and it interferes. So what. The business is called. Moreover, the S-400 has a competitive advantage over the Patriot. There was no way to be guessed.
      1. D16
        0
        2 November 2019 08: 46
        There was no way to be guessed.

        This you subtly noticed. laughing The complex has been in the war for four years and everything will not be decayed. Opportunities, you know, no. No one Khimki RSami and UAV attack wassat .
    32. 0
      31 October 2019 20: 27
      But aren't the USA themselves making copies of the AK-47 and shoving it wherever they can? It seems that we are not sculpting M-16 / M-4 for the market.
    33. 0
      31 October 2019 20: 31
      Does the American know nothing about competition? Nonsense.
    34. 0
      31 October 2019 20: 48
      Quote: Alex_You
      Well, the S-400 in Syria showed itself "well".

      Do not get in the way. It’s not possible here. Blow in the right direction, please ...
    35. 0
      31 October 2019 21: 03
      Speaking at a briefing in Washington, Cooper said that Russia is trying to impose its S-400 anti-aircraft system on other countries, thereby depriving the United States of the opportunity to supply "advanced weapons."

      "Advanced weapons" lol Is this, almost forty years old, "Patriot" advanced weapons?
    36. +2
      31 October 2019 21: 16
      Nonsense, with our education, our politicians will soon become impoverished laughing
    37. +1
      31 October 2019 21: 23
      At least, a strange whining sounds from the lips of an American official ...
    38. 0
      31 October 2019 21: 51
      Is this an advertisement?
    39. +1
      31 October 2019 22: 08
      Look how vulnerable !!! And the product of Mikhail Timofeevich, model 47, is remembered as our father !!!!
    40. +1
      31 October 2019 22: 32
      Comparing the S-400 with Kalash, he does not understand what makes the system good advertising.
    41. +1
      31 October 2019 23: 45
      It seems that what this Cooper said is called the word "concurrence". Poor Cooper must have fought back tears laughing
    42. 0
      31 October 2019 23: 47
      Great) well, yes, your doshirak is more energetic, but the bad Russians shove everyone beef, not EPT) how to live now :)
    43. +1
      1 November 2019 01: 13
      The State Department announced a competition for the most stupid commentator about the failure of American weapons?
    44. -1
      1 November 2019 03: 54
      Yes, our world has become saturated Amerovskaya democracy.
      The time comes for other countries and a lot of polar views.
      Cry exceptional senators and congressmen of a striped rag.
    45. 0
      1 November 2019 05: 33
      "advanced American weapons". --- well, damn it made fun))) pleased))
    46. 0
      1 November 2019 06: 51
      It does not interfere, but competes in some types of expensive and high-tech weapons. Such as C300 / 400 / Beech, Thor, Carapace and Su30 / 35.
      And people clearly see that restrictions on the sale cease to work. You will not sell, you will sell the Russian Federation, and control and permits for US exports do not apply to the Russian Federation. Unlike Western competitors. The same song with Asian rivals in industrial technology. This is a given and the West is just beginning to understand it.
    47. 0
      1 November 2019 10: 42
      "Slips" - and about such a word Competition never heard?
    48. 0
      1 November 2019 10: 46
      Lamerka prevents Russia from selling advanced weapons to other countries, slipping them a petriot!
      We are Russians, God is with us!
    49. 0
      1 November 2019 13: 16
      they are not worried about the supply of their "advanced weapons", but about what is now. Their aircraft carrier will not be able to shell the territories belonging to the countries that buy our defense systems with impunity.
    50. 0
      1 November 2019 17: 19
      Frankly neighing over such statements, it needs to be flattened by how they screwed up. Do they think that comparing something with the AK-47 indicate they are behind? Yes, you can only dream of such an advertisement ... idiots.
    51. 0
      1 November 2019 17: 33
      well advertised. S-400 is cool like Kalashnikov!
    52. 0
      2 November 2019 00: 06
      Listen funny laughing
    53. 0
      29 January 2020 15: 51
      Quote: maxim947
      I still can’t understand whether they are mocking or are they really so fucking? Well, how can this be stated at the state level ?? Damn, there are no normal words ...

      So transport so many opioids from Afghanistan.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"