US Congress opposed Russia's return to the G7

95
The US Congress strongly opposed Russia's return to the G-7 format and its transformation into the G-8. The resolution against the accession of Moscow was adopted by the US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs. This is stated in a message on the website of one of the authors of the document of Congressman Albio Cyres.

US Congress opposed Russia's return to the G7




The US Congress passed a resolution against Russia's return to the G-7 format. The document says that Russia should not have access to this format until it "respects the territorial integrity of its neighbors" and until it "adheres to the standards of democratic societies." According to congressmen, since 2014, when Russia stopped participating in this format, none of these conditions have been met. The decision was made unanimously.

Recall that the G-7 includes Germany, the USA, Canada, Japan, France, the UK and Italy, in 1998 the format was expanded to the G-8 due to the accession of Russia. In this form, it lasted until the 2014 year, when in connection with the return of the Crimea, Russia was excluded from the format.

Note that talk of Russia’s returning to G7 began with Donald Trump, who proposed inviting Vladimir Putin to the next G-7 meeting planned for 2020 in the United States. According to the American leader, it makes no sense to discuss some world problems without Russia. At the same time, in Europe they could not come to a common opinion on this issue, linking the return of Russia with the issue of a settlement in Ukraine.

In turn, Vladimir Putin said earlier that Russia does not seek to return to G7, since all issues are resolved in a completely different format - the "Big Twenty."
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    31 October 2019 09: 25
    The right congressmen.
    Russia does not need such a company.
    1. +2
      31 October 2019 09: 27
      This so-called "Big Seven" without Russia is just an empty phrase and nothing more.
      Against the backdrop of the political degradation of the United States and its vassals, Russia, on the contrary, raises its rating and does not need leniency on returning to this sandbox.
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 09: 49
        Well, the woman’s yaga is against ... what can I say ...
        1. +1
          31 October 2019 12: 03
          Russia itself is against the return of liars to this seven .. Without us, they lose weight.
    2. +2
      31 October 2019 09: 28
      Quote: Livonetc
      The right congressmen.

      The American Congress strongly opposed the return of Russia to the GXNUMX format and its transformation into the GXNUMX.
      Of course, the "Big Six" is more profitable for them, where the seventh, chief godfather, the United States, who would doubt
    3. +1
      31 October 2019 09: 31
      Quote: Livonetc
      The right congressmen.

      Let them prepare for the fact that they will be ranked as supporters of Putin ...
      Quote: Livonetc
      Russia does not need such a company.

      I think that it would not hurt our opinion to ask if we want to be in the US "six"
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 11: 24
        Quote: svp67
        I think that it would not hurt our opinion to ask if we want to be in the US "six"

        What for? We have already hinted to them that Russia is quite satisfied with participation in the G20 format, where, among others, representatives of the countries of the same "six" are also rustling.
    4. -3
      31 October 2019 09: 43
      Quote: Livonetc
      The right congressmen.
      Russia does not need such a company.

      Well yes, tell me.
      The Kremlin sleeps and sees when the sanctions cease, takes all efforts to do this, and returning to the Big Seven is one of the steps to ending the sanctions.
      1. +2
        31 October 2019 09: 47
        I don’t know what they are dreaming of.
        But you do not follow the information of the Kremlin itself.
        Repeatedly on such issues at the highest level, at least the need for the big twenty has been declared.
        And at the moment, Russia is developing a much larger project of global cooperation.
        1. -6
          31 October 2019 09: 50
          Quote: Livonetc
          Repeatedly on such issues at the highest level, at least the need for the big twenty has been declared.

          So there are the big twenty, as well as the big seven, there are also BRICS and a bunch of others.
          That's not the question.
          It is the GXNUMX that rules the world.
          Quote: Livonetc
          And at the moment, Russia is developing a much larger project of global cooperation.

          Yes? And what kind of project is this?
          1. +1
            31 October 2019 09: 59
            "He who has eyes, let him see.
            Whoever has ears, let him hear. "
            Observe the intensity and effectiveness of international contacts in Russia at the moment.
            This level has never happened in the history of Russia.
            I understand that there are always two views.
            Staaan is half empty or the glass is half full.
            Always and everyone wants everything at once.
            But this is from the realm of not even fantasy but fantasy.
            While we are observing systemic and progressive development.
            And the fact that an absolute breakthrough has not happened yet is a fact, alas.
            Will be working.
            hi
            1. 0
              31 October 2019 10: 01
              I would be your optimism! hi
              1. +1
                31 October 2019 10: 05
                Throughout my life I saw a lot of shit talking at a high level with different people.
                What I managed to learn from the primary sources should have led to the opinion that everything would definitely collapse.
                However, what I see now has nothing to do with the disaster.
                Break through.
                This is the strongest ability of the Russians.
                hi
            2. +3
              31 October 2019 10: 45
              Quote: Livonetc
              Will be working.

              You rush with a half empty glass, like a cat with a mouse. We saw this work. What do we need the Paris Club of Debtors for? Where can we get away from PACE? What have we acquired in the WTO?
              And the glass is half empty. There is no specifics that you could grab onto and say that for the sake of IT you can tighten your belts and tolerate.
              I don't like it when they try to find some rainbow pictures on a blank sheet of paper. True, there are some "successes" gained either by excessive funding or by mind-boggling deadlines ... Yes
          2. +3
            31 October 2019 10: 18
            Who rules the world there? What a 7. 90s stayed in the last century wake up. Now there are other processes. Does Canada rule the world? Ahaha, in which case it will block the screw with maple syrup and all the khan lol Italy? Which is in a state of "pre-bankruptcy" and does not know when to get out from there. England with Brexit? Which after January 31, 2020 it is not yet known what it will look like. Does France rule the world? They forgot to withdraw the special forces from Syria and they whined to the whole world that they were thrown, well, the world ruler is what you need. I am generally silent about Japan, the occupied islands with an official ban on having their own army, but with permission to have them, the same to me the rulers wassat Name at least one fateful decision that the Big Seven has made over the past five years. That's what would directly take and change the world. And if you want, I’ll tell you about Russia, I just went into Syria to the offhand and completely changed the global alignment, now it’ll start three pipelines and the world will change even more, the Northern Sea Route will be launched with the inclusion of the Chinese project of the new Silk Road and the world will never be the same . So your fetish about 7-ku is no longer relevant.
            1. -1
              31 October 2019 10: 25
              You say I'm stuck in the 90s? Well, then you were in the 80s with stamps about the decaying West.
              1. +1
                31 October 2019 10: 39
                What does the stamp rotting west!! Just the facts, the economic and political condition of Italy at the moment which? About France, did I invent something, French leaders spoke about it, and yellow vests, and immigrants? Brexit in England and rummaging in their parliament is a stamp from the 80s laughing Japan is not docked, and Germany has over 100 American military bases in Germany, what are you talking about, I didn’t say that they rot, you said that, I said that they are the rulers of the world like a bullet from "poop". And yes, you never said about the fateful decision for the whole world, made by the big 7th over the past 5 years. I will help you, the only decision is not fateful, but loud and useless that your rulers have made over the past 5 years, this is the exclusion of Russia from the 8 laughing Well, a strong move, just like PASS good those, too, stamped their feet, almost went bankrupt.
            2. 0
              31 October 2019 12: 19
              Quote: Air Force

              Who rules the world there?

              The world has been ruled by the "golden elite" for about 200 years.
              1. -2
                31 October 2019 13: 39
                Quote: tihonmarine
                The world has been ruled by the "golden elite" for about 200 years.

                And you REN-TV laughing
                1. +1
                  31 October 2019 15: 30
                  Quote: Vladimir16
                  And you REN-TV

                  Well, then, in your opinion, in Russia people live not in real reality, but in virtual. Or is socialism in Russia now ???
        2. -2
          31 October 2019 11: 08
          The question of the "twenty" was raised only because the way to the "seven" of Russia was barred.
        3. +4
          31 October 2019 11: 17
          It is necessary to develop the country, not large-scale projects of global interaction, from which the population has been impoverished for the sixth year in a row
      2. 0
        31 October 2019 10: 51
        Quote: RUSS
        Quote: Livonetc
        The right congressmen.
        Russia does not need such a company.

        Well yes, tell me.
        The Kremlin sleeps and sees when the sanctions cease, takes all efforts to do this, and returning to the Big Seven is one of the steps to ending the sanctions.

        The Kremlin does not need a seven, due to the irrelevance of this circle of interests. Russia is too big for that side chair, which Russia was previously offered and is now offered.
        The US Congress simply “blows” its cheeks, not hearing (traditionally) the opinion of Russia that the seven is unnecessary to it.
    5. +2
      31 October 2019 09: 47
      "Correct Congressmen.
      Russia does not need such a company in any way "
      I begin the insight with respect for the Amersan Senate - this is their second reasonable decision! ...
      The first blocking of the transaction for the purchase of Hohlak Dawn by the Chinese! ...
      Work further in the same spirit, guys - we cheer for you !!! ...
      dog
      for some reason it sometimes seems to me that the cheated congressmen also quite sincerely cherish daily for our our Duma thinkers from EP! ...
      Chur chur me - an obsession of course! ... - and how could I even think of our planed deputies who cannot live a day, even though a thread doesn’t care about the people! ...
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 10: 53
        I completely agree. Or stupid not childish. Now, if you take the nineties and the beginning of the two thousandth, you could have tamed Russia and bought with giblets, showing a bit of pliability. Under the then pro-Western government and the still not scattering perestroika illusions among the population.
        Oh, the card "peace, friendship, chewing gum" was not played completely. Which turned out to be good for us.
    6. +3
      31 October 2019 09: 51
      In this "big seven" ("port group" (Port 777) wink ) no CHINA ... So what?
      For a long time this seven has turned into lovers of evening ... tea ..
      1. +2
        31 October 2019 10: 00
        Yes, what for is this "seven" to us ... (\ just kidding! (for those who are in the "tank") laughing
        1. -2
          31 October 2019 10: 50
          Quote: Aerodrome
          Yes, what for is this "seven" to us ... (\ just kidding! (for those who are in the "tank")

          You watch this from 7:26 ...
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efLAWXPydSc
          right in the hole ... laughing
      2. +1
        31 October 2019 12: 05
        Quote: To be or not to be
        For a long time this seven has turned into lovers of evening ... tea.

        We sat, listened to "Uncle Sam (Trump), took pictures, settled down, sipped warm railway tea from a thermos on the path and went home. At least we went to a cafe, boredom.
      3. 0
        31 October 2019 12: 22
        Now this "big seven" is turning into an extra, praising the United States. So, gentlemen, you can somehow manage without Russia.
        By the way, if we consider in detail all the criteria for membership in this "big seven" that the US Congress is promoting, then the United States should be the first to be excluded from this club.
    7. -4
      31 October 2019 10: 00
      Quote: Livonetc
      The right congressmen.
      Russia does not need such a company.

      Well yes. She asked, asked, and when she was accepted, she participated and did not rush to leave. That's when they kicked out - "not needed."
    8. +1
      31 October 2019 12: 00
      Quote: Livonetc
      Russia does not need such a company.

      The company is still the same. And what to talk about with them? Everything is like the saying "Look blind, said the dumb, how the legless will run."
    9. 0
      31 October 2019 12: 48
      The people of Russia do not need any return to the "Big Seven", but the Russian leadership is dreaming of an early return to this gadyushnik ...
    10. 0
      31 October 2019 14: 01
      Quote: Livonetc
      Russia does not need such a company.

      The whole idiocy of the current Western policy is that they are trying to isolate one seventh of the land, which is located on all trade routes, and the most interesting thing is that the inhabitants in Europe, America again and again elect these idiots, after which they write comments on YouTube about how they love Russia.
      1. 0
        31 October 2019 15: 16
        it is economically possible to isolate China, and not that 3% of the world's GDP is like that of Russia, it worked with the USSR.
        Quote: NEXUS
        which is located on all trade routes.

        The main trade routes are maritime, and the US fleet controls them mainly.
        But I understand that you are one of the adherents of "sanctions for the benefit" ...
        1. 0
          31 October 2019 15: 19
          Quote: Arturov
          it is economically possible to isolate China, and not that 3% of the world's GDP is like that of Russia, it worked with the USSR.

          You, an adept - "I will sell my own mother for an iPhone", measure everything with green candy wrappers. How did humanity live before these candy wrappers?
  2. +2
    31 October 2019 09: 25
    Less money for business trips! Why should we attend this “wedding” meeting ???
    At Twenty - all serious issues are resolved!
    1. +1
      31 October 2019 11: 10
      Quote: Hunter 2
      Less money for business trips! Why should we attend this “wedding” meeting ???
      At Twenty - all serious issues are resolved!

      Neither the seven nor the twenty in the current realities solve anything.
      The world has broken up into different formats. Countries agree directly with each other, or groups of countries. And this has nothing to do with either 7 or 20.
      In my unenlightened view.
      1. -1
        31 October 2019 11: 22
        Quote: den3080
        The world has broken up into different formats.

        On the contrary, the world is becoming more globalized.
        1. +1
          31 October 2019 18: 04
          Quote: RUSS
          Quote: den3080
          The world has broken up into different formats.

          On the contrary, the world is becoming more globalized.

          Nothing of the kind, the world is breaking up in real life.
          Trade barriers, sanctions, double standards - all this creates distrust, deepens cracks even in “traditional” blocks and forces to negotiate “face to face”. What globalization is there? One migrant question in the EU is worth it. A brexit? Think about it.

          The so-called globalization exists on the Internet, that is, the speed of information transfer has increased by orders of magnitude, as well as the ability to create fakes.
          You can find out that a crocodile was grabbing a tourist’s ass in the suburbs of some Darwin in Australia a few minutes later, but 15 years ago you would never have known about this absolutely significant event, although it was going for you. And was that a crocodile ... and a tourist? Unknown
          Fake globalization in one word.
  3. -1
    31 October 2019 09: 28
    What are we going to do now ?! And how can we now live without the G-7 ???! crying lol
  4. -3
    31 October 2019 09: 29
    What the hell do we need a side chair for?
    That Yeltsin was happy with such an honor.
    Putin is still more proud.
    And it is not congress that decides this question.
    But I wonder if Trump will take and invite Putin?
    Will BB fly or not? (Here the bomb can turn out ...)
  5. -2
    31 October 2019 09: 29
    Will we worry much? I think not. If the number is so important to them 8, then instead of ourselves we can delegate someone from the CSTO or Venezuela with the DPRK to choose from. lol laughing
  6. -2
    31 October 2019 09: 30
    I wonder who they (Congress) scare. Myself or Russia?
    1. 0
      31 October 2019 09: 53
      They are trying to say that there is such a Sharashkin office Zh-7. Our on this canoe long waved a hand, these decided to remind. Suddenly, Russia will be interested. hi
  7. +4
    31 October 2019 09: 31
    I don’t remember something .. that Russia would ask for this Seven.
    1. -8
      31 October 2019 09: 39
      Russia did not ask, and Putin even asked for NATO.
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 09: 41
        A reference please.
        1. -6
          31 October 2019 09: 52
          To Siberia? I'm with a smartphone. So really with your fingers on the keyboard.
        2. -2
          31 October 2019 10: 04
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          A reference please.

          Hold on, analyst.
          In an interview with director Oliver Stone, President Vladimir Putin said that he proposed to Bill Clinton, when he was president of the United States, to consider the option of Russia joining NATO.

          https://ria.ru/20170603/1495759550.html
        3. 0
          31 October 2019 10: 04
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          A reference please.

          In an interview with director Oliver Stone, President Vladimir Putin said that he proposed to Bill Clinton, when he was president of the United States, to consider the option of Russia joining NATO.
          "I remember one of our last meetings with President Clinton, he came to Moscow. During the discussion, I said: maybe look at the option that Russia will join NATO. Clinton replied: I do not mind. But the whole delegation was very nervous." - Putin said in an interview.
          1. -4
            31 October 2019 10: 12
            Quote: Gardamir
            Putin even asked for NATO

            Quote: RUSS
            (Putin) I said during the discussion: maybe look at such an option that Russia will join NATO. Clinton replied: I do not mind

            From the text you quoted it does not at all follow that someone "asked for" somewhere.

            Was "Gardamir" wrong, or did you give the wrong text? wink
            1. -1
              31 October 2019 10: 27
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Was "Gardamir" wrong, or did you give the wrong text?

              Watch Stone's movie, his interview, etc.
              1. -1
                31 October 2019 10: 31
                Quote: RUSS
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                Was "Gardamir" wrong, or did you give the wrong text?

                Watch Stone's movie, his interview, etc.

                Thank. I have no more questions laughing
          2. -2
            31 October 2019 10: 29
            "I remember one of our last meetings with President Clinton, he came to Moscow. During the discussion, I said: maybe look at the option that Russia will join NATO. Clinton replied: I do not mind. But the whole delegation was very nervous." - Putin said in an interview.

            Well, the former intelligence officer probes the position of the Americans, guessing in advance what answer he will receive, since the Americans are clearly nervous. Like Putin didn’t behave, didn’t prepare Russia for NATO membership, and they don’t like him in the West. NATO has not dreamed of before. So this is not an argument. In the interview, Putin blames the conflict on the Americans, arguing that you quoted.
            Quote: abyssal
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            A reference please.

            Hold on, analyst.
            In an interview with director Oliver Stone, President Vladimir Putin said that he proposed to Bill Clinton, when he was president of the United States, to consider the option of Russia joining NATO.

            https://ria.ru/20170603/1495759550.html

            The answer in this post is higher.
            Quote: Gardamir
            To Siberia? I'm with a smartphone. So really with your fingers on the keyboard.

            I also write from a smartphone. But I provide links.
      2. -2
        31 October 2019 09: 50
        And where did you just not ask. Have you taken? what
      3. 0
        31 October 2019 10: 02
        Figured it out myself?
  8. -6
    31 October 2019 09: 38
    I support the decisions of Congress.
    1. +1
      31 October 2019 09: 44
      Congress doesn’t care whether you support it or not, just as Russia doesn’t care for this G7. So by the checkout. winked
      1. -2
        31 October 2019 09: 53
        of Russia
        Do not confuse the country and the liberals in power.
      2. 0
        31 October 2019 10: 07
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Congress doesn’t care whether you support it or not, just as Russia doesn’t care for this G7. So by the checkout. winked

        ZAKHAROVA WANTS TO OFFICIALLY TALK ABOUT RUSSIA'S RETURN TO G7.
        21.08.2019.
        Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the Russian side is waiting for concrete proposals on Russia's possible return to the GXNUMX. This is reported by the "Moscow Says" edition.

        "Proposals should be formed, if any, and submitted to the Russian side for consideration. Now it is difficult to understand what is at stake. Therefore, it is necessary to transfer the discussion of this topic from the public and entertainment sphere to the professional sphere, if the seven wants to position itself as a serious format," she said.
    2. 0
      31 October 2019 09: 45
      Quote: Gardamir
      I support the decisions of Congress.

      Strange, why are you being minus? Hurray patriots scream that we do not need the Big Seven, but at the same time do not support the decision of the Congress?
    3. +1
      31 October 2019 09: 55
      Yes, all do not care about the decision of Congress. . But what about the link about the request to NATO? winked Interested, however.
      1. -1
        31 October 2019 10: 04
        I agree about spitting, but not smart people do not understand jokes. As for the request, if you yourself do not find it, then I will only be at the computer in the evening.
  9. HAM
    +1
    31 October 2019 09: 40
    What big "seven" are we talking about? I only know the United States and its six ...
    1. -5
      31 October 2019 09: 53
      Quote: HAM
      What big "seven" are we talking about? I only know the United States and its six ...

      We are talking about countries whose economy is at least better than ours, well, if that.
      And it is still not clear who is more than six in front of the USA, Russia or the West.
  10. 0
    31 October 2019 09: 42
    And why do we even need to be among the Russophobic ghouls, if my will Russia left the hysterical anti-Russian organization called PACE, which regularly adopts frankly Russophobic resolutions, then give the Russian Crimea to the banderlogs, then they equated the USSR with the Third Reich.
    1. 0
      31 October 2019 09: 55
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      if my will Russia left the hysterical anti-Russian organization called PACE,

      According to Vladimir Bruter, a political scientist at the International Institute for Humanitarian and Political Studies, the work of the Russian delegation at PACE makes it possible to conduct discussions on this site during which all the most pressing problems of today are discussed. Given the continued sanction pressure on the Russian Federation and the frank reluctance of powerful Western forces, primarily the United States, to speak with Moscow, this assembly is an effective tool for upholding Russia's interests in the international arena. In practical terms, participation in the work of PACE gives Moscow the right to participate in the election of the organization’s secretary general, to vote on various resolutions of the assembly, as well as to accept conclusions on the candidatures of new member states and to monitor their implementation of the commitments made upon accession. PACE adopts conclusions on the draft of all international conventions developed by the Council of Europe.

      Separately, it is worth highlighting the right of PACE delegations to choose judges to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Commissioner for Human Rights. This institution is seen by many as the last hope in the struggle for the triumph of legal justice. However, according to the chairman of the Federation Council, Valentina Matvienko, without the participation of Russia in the work of the assembly, the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights would not be recognized by Moscow as legitimate.
    2. 0
      31 October 2019 10: 01
      Yes, not among ghouls, but among pro-American sixes. So for me, Russia's exit from the G8 is like raising the status of the country, since we have ceased to be a semi-colony, in the wake of the United States. A sign that the country began to follow the path (albeit at the very beginning of this difficult path, but still) of self-sufficiency, the country's solvency as an independent unit, and not as someone's appendage, serving someone else. All these sanctions, anti-Russian resolutions, attempts to return us to the so-called "civilized" community, serve the desire to return us to the stall of pro-American slaves. There are gentlemen Anglo-Saxons, and all the rest of the laborers.
  11. +2
    31 October 2019 09: 45
    China is not included in the G7, and feels great.
  12. 0
    31 October 2019 09: 50
    laughing So Russia didn’t even ask?
    1. -2
      31 October 2019 10: 09
      Quote: Captive
      laughing So Russia didn’t even ask?

      Requested
      1. +1
        31 October 2019 10: 13
        When did she ask for this?
        1. -2
          31 October 2019 10: 28
          Quote: Captive
          When did she ask for this?

          My comment above about Zakharova
        2. -2
          31 October 2019 10: 35
          Under Yeltsin.
  13. +1
    31 October 2019 09: 52
    ".... Recall that the" Big Seven "includes Germany, the United States, Canada, Japan, France, Great Britain and Italy ..."

    "big seven" - a stupid name that does not correspond to reality. Just a ponty club. tongue
    There are real big three - Russia, China and India. And in terms of area, population, and economy (already breathing in the back of the head "seven").
    1. -1
      31 October 2019 10: 51
      and in general I think that the "big seven" is a rudiment left to the world since the 19th century. and we live already at 21.
  14. 0
    31 October 2019 09: 55
    Yes, and their forest
  15. +1
    31 October 2019 09: 57
    It seems, after all, without Russia, even in anybody who does not need the G7, (there is the G20) nor in PACE.
    Otherwise, with what fright they rushed to refuse, even at the Congress level, although no one asked for them? Is this, according to Freud, probably a masochistic sexual subconscious? what laughing
  16. 0
    31 October 2019 10: 14
    ... "The US Congress opposed Russia's return to the GXNUMX ...
    There is a gag in every barrel!
  17. 0
    31 October 2019 10: 20
    Somewhere on the edge of the Earth there are hot battles that not only cost tens of millions of dollars, but also have no practical use, because we didn’t ask anyone for anything and are not going anywhere.
    What is this if not stupidity in some kind of parallel reality?
  18. 0
    31 October 2019 10: 21
    Summer 2018 said. "Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in turn, recalled that Russia never asked to return to the G7, and called the G20180614 a more promising format for multilateral diplomacy ..." https://ria.ru/1522668908/XNUMX.html
    1. -3
      31 October 2019 10: 29
      Quote: Captive
      Summer 2018 said. "Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in turn, recalled that Russia never asked to return to the G7, and called the G20180614 a more promising format for multilateral diplomacy ..." https://ria.ru/1522668908/XNUMX.html

      Good mine, with a bad game
  19. 0
    31 October 2019 10: 34
    The US Congressmen are against, but we probably still somehow side their opinion. There is currently no huge desire to increase the sevens on our part. They will press and forget about their vote. In general, this planetary chief was completely unbridled, having arrogated to himself the right to individually make decisions in the world and try to build everyone under American Wishlist and jurisdiction.
  20. -2
    31 October 2019 10: 50
    Zakharova should be advised to the American Congress to do business, and not empty exhaust, Russia refused and is refusing a place in the GXNUMX.
  21. 0
    31 October 2019 10: 56
    Announce the entire list of "standards of crap societies", please! Oops ...
  22. -1
    31 October 2019 11: 16
    And what, someone in Russia asked for the G7? A strange decision when they begin to prohibit entering where no one was going to enter. I can imagine if it were written on the trash can: "Don't get inside!" What a reaction this caused from passers-by and the public in general.
    The G7 has long lost its former influence. It would be logical to include Ukraine there, since, as it turned out, it is she who greatly influences the fate of the world and directly on the domestic and foreign policy of the US government. And it is not for American elders to tell how someone should behave with their "neighbors."
  23. 0
    31 October 2019 11: 27
    and how was it: one stupid person in Congress said that Russia wants the Big Seven, and the other swooning old man said that it was impossible? And both celebrated another victory over Russia?
  24. -1
    31 October 2019 11: 29
    The American Congress strongly opposed the return of Russia to the GXNUMX format and its transformation into the GXNUMX.

    Dumbheads !!!
    You asked Russia if she wants to go there herself? fool lol
    And if she wanted to, then none of the congressional elders could do anything against it. fellow laughing
  25. 0
    31 October 2019 11: 48
    To consolidate the "friendship", the Breten Woods agreements must be canceled.
  26. 0
    31 October 2019 12: 33
    "I was crying!"
  27. 0
    31 October 2019 12: 50
    If in the "big seven" Russia is given the place of the "little six", then there really is nothing to catch there.
  28. 0
    31 October 2019 16: 35
    Americans and their six sixes are not bad.
  29. +2
    31 October 2019 17: 25
    It's a rare occasion when I agree with the mattress congressmen. Russia has nothing to do in the "small seven", since the "gopnik and six" format does not suit us.
  30. 0
    1 November 2019 20: 33
    This is not a seven - this is the United States and its sixes.