Four overseas 29Б6 “Container” radars deployed in Russia

The first over-the-horizon radar of the new generation “Container” will be handed over to the Russian Armed Forces by the end of this year; it is currently undergoing state tests. About this in an interview with RIA News"said the director general of" NPK "Research Institute of Long-Range Radio Communications" (part of the RTI), who developed this station, Kirill Makarov.

According to Makarov, the first Container radar will be handed over to the military at the end of this year after passing state tests. In total, four such stations are planned to be deployed: one each in the west and east of the country, two more will be deployed in the north-west and south directions.

Now, given that backlog, we are creating a family of over-the-horizon radars of the "Container" type. The first station has passed preliminary tests and is undergoing state tests, we hope that by the end of 2019 of the year the first "Container" will be transferred to the Armed Forces

- he said.

The Director General explained that the radar data are designed to detect all types of aerodynamic targets, including airplanes, cruise missiles, hypersonic aircraft and so on. "Container" is able to control flights of any air targets at a distance of about 3 thousand kilometers in the sector 240 degrees. A radar can simultaneously track over 5 of thousands of airborne objects of various types, including small ones.

At the same time, according to Makarov, the station has a "dead zone", so it was decided to build such stations in the interior of the country.

The radar has a so-called dead zone. It is 900 kilometers, so it was decided that the station was located in the interior of the country, this allows the station to be safe and to control the airspace of neighboring states

- explained the general director.

At present, on experimental combat duty from December 1 last year, there is one new generation 29Б6 "Container" radar. The receiving complex of the station is located in Mordovia near the village of Kovylkino, and the transmitter of the station is located in the Nizhny Novgorod region. The radar controls the airspace over Europe to great depths.

Comments

[Tiksi-3]

a transmitter is located next to Gorodets .... I drive every exit nearby

[Egorovich]

"I will strictly follow, - I can see everything from above, - You just know ..." - song "Time to go, road"

[askort154]

A beautiful "fence". And the alarm is decent.

[YOUR]

This fence is 1300 m long, 200 m wide and each "post" is 34.15 m high.
Large building.

[Valery Valery]

Really powerful thing! As for the 5000 goals - in principle, these are ALL GOALS that fell into the review sector.

[Konstantin Shevchenko]

Now it remains for the small. To master the refueling with missiles in the SU-27P air and click like seeds F- .. and B- ..

[asv363]

Interview text (not only about RPS "Container"): https://ria.ru/20191030/1560349595.html

[Operator]

Great news - like an aspen stake in the skull of Russophobes - members of the VO, who fought in an epileptic with a squeal: "ZGRLS cannot provide external target designation for missiles with ARGSN."

Do not forget to insert the wick in their ass as soon as they start yelling at the "Container" again.

[ss-n-22]

Quote: Operator

Great news - like an aspen stake in the skull of Russophobes - members of the VO, who fought in an epileptic with a squeal: "ZGRLS cannot provide external target designation for missiles with ARGSN."

Do not forget to insert the wick in their ass as soon as they start yelling at the "Container" again.

Tell the difference between detection and targeting? Why are the firing radars three-coordinate - bearing, distance, elevation, and the navigation "vaygach" - 2 coordinates?

[Operator]

Catch the third coordinate - ARGS 9Б-1103М2

[Vlad.by]

And I will tell you so - paraphrasing the famous Latin wisdom - notified, then armed.
Own means of reconnaissance of anti-aircraft missiles are often quite sufficient for detection, tracking and missile defense.
Especially if you know in advance which sector and what to look for.
This is exactly what is required from the ZGRLS and passive reconnaissance stations.
Nobody expects them from the exact TSU, and the autopsy of the intent of the raid and the concept of disposition of the IOS are very useful. Again, concentrate in advance the means of reconnaissance and destruction on the threatened area ...
IA tighten if necessary.

So - more "Containers", different and different!
Preferably in combination with "Murmansk", "Moskva", "Borisoglebsk" and "Sunflowers".
Well, "Vega" and "Valeria", too, will not be superfluous!

[Doctor]

Well this is you, aircraft carriers, hang on there.
Under the hood from the Aleutians to the Philippines, Iceland, the Mediterranean Sea.
In conjunction with medium-range missiles ...

[saygon66]

- Isn't that kind of thing ("brain burner") worth it in Pripyat?

[Operator]

Such is the design of the 1980's, of course.

[saygon66]

- The power consumption is crazy there! According to conversations, she was in Pripyat and stood because the nuclear power plant was nearby ...

[Operator]

The power consumption of the Russian OGRLS "Container" is more than an order of magnitude less than that of the Soviet ZGRLS "Duga" - technical progress plus a reasonable reduction in the detection range of air targets from 9000 km (threefold reflection of the sounding radio signal from the ionosphere) to 3000 km (single reflection).

[Eragon]

Quote: saygon66

- Isn't that kind of thing ("brain burner") worth it in Pripyat?

She, darling. Rather, the ancestor of the "Container" is "Arc".

[ss-n-22]

Quote: Operator

ARGS 9B-1103M2

Yeah. According to the preliminary target designation of the air defense system for reaching the target location of the target. 2 kilometers, according to your own advertiser. And to this distance who will direct it? So what is the difference between the three and two coordinate radars in the context of target designation?

ARGSN 9B-1103M provides:
search, capture and tracking of moving targets on preliminary target designation of radar air carriers or anti-aircraft systems"

[Operator]

This is not an advertising murzilka, but an information stand of NPO Agat, which, within the framework of the Army-2019 forum, signed a contract with the Russian Ministry of Defense for the serial production of ARGS 9B-1103M2.

The accuracy of determining the position of the air target of the OGRLS "Container" is 1 km.

The minimum ARGS detection distance in 2 km is given for the case of operation in the millimeter range for an air target with an EPR of 0,03 sq.m. In the centimeter range, when working on targets with EPR from 0,1 sq.m (LRASM, F-22, F-35, B-2, etc.), the minimum detection distance starts from 12 km.

Wick does not bake?

[ss-n-22]

You have an enchanting school idea about the work of air defense systems))

[Operator]

You have a corporal view of over-the-horizon guidance of anti-aircraft missiles.

[sabotage]

Quote: Operator

You have a corporal view of over-the-horizon guidance of anti-aircraft missiles.

So far, not a single SAM is capable of working together with ZGRLS. Can you imagine the level of the task? In order for everything to work correctly, it is necessary to collect data from all 4 air defense systems, transfer them to the air defense headquarters and to the KP of specific air defense systems in real time. Configure algorithms for the operation of air defense systems in joint modes with ZGRLS and another million questions. Our valiant staffers will never be able to organize this due to intellectual limitations.

[Operator]

It is, of course, super-efficient to collect data from all four ZGRLS (this will ultimately be done), but it is by no means necessary - each radar is completely self-sufficient in its coverage area.

In the operational work of air defense systems, and even more so in the adjustment of algorithms, staff officers are not at work with the word at all, their task is to correctly plan the placement and order of interaction of the radar, air defense systems, command centers and communication lines. After that, command posts and combat crews come into play.

You are completely unfamiliar with the officers of the General Staff of the Air Defense Forces of the Air Defense Forces of the Russian Aerospace Forces, so your statement about their intelligence indicates only your IQ.

[sabotage]

Quote: Operator

You are completely unfamiliar with the officers of the General Staff of the Air Defense Forces of the Air Defense Forces of the Russian Aerospace Forces, so your statement about their intelligence indicates only your IQ.

I look at the results of their activities. And they are depressing. Similar results can produce ducks or porcelain blanks.

[Vlad.by]

Those. a single zrbr, only with attached detection tools (rtb), is not operational even theoretically ???
Well, like, since there is no notification information from above and secondary information from neighbors?
I am begging you...
How did we, the "poor", carry that alert ?!

As for the operation of the air defense systems with ZGRLS, we do not need an exact control center from it. Nobody is going to shoot rockets into milk.
Let them just say - where is the enemy, what he is planning, from where he is sneaking. As in that joke - "you are not smart of yourself, you show the direction with your hand."
And in our area of ​​responsibility, we will find it, accompany it, target it ...
Will "gnaw" the earth like a sweetheart.
Well, if it’s so tricky that it won’t work in the RFP, we will ask the flyers for help.
Those for the joy of the "sworn friend" with a rocket.
Something like this.

[sabotage]

Quote: Vlad.by

As for the operation of the air defense systems with ZGRLS, we do not need an exact control center from it. Nobody is going to shoot rockets into milk.
Let them just say - where is the enemy, what he is planning, from where he is sneaking. As in that joke - "you are not smart of yourself, you show the direction with your hand."
And in our area of ​​responsibility, we will find it, accompany it, target it ...
Will "gnaw" the earth like a sweetheart.
Well, if it’s so tricky that it won’t work in the RFP, we will ask the flyers for help.
Those for the joy of the "sworn friend" with a rocket.
Something like this.

Well, how much can you? The process of indicating directions for aviation and air defense systems from ZGRLS imagine? Or is all consciousness at the level of a squad leader?

[Vlad.by]

I, in general, am a professional air defense ASUshnik. And, yes, he was once the commander of the cadet department. In MVIZRU air defense, 4 ph. 1982 graduation
And, you know, "... The process of indicating the direction for aviation and air defense missile systems from ZGRLS ..." I quite imagine ...
As well as the conduct of hostilities as part and combination of air defense, too.

So there is no need for "sabotage"

[sabotage]

Quote: Vlad.by

I, in general, am a professional air defense ASUshnik.

ASUshnik in the sense of a developer or just repair and maintenance?

[Vlad.by]

Quote: Vlad.by
I, in general, am a professional air defense ASUshnik.

ASUshnik in the sense of a developer or just repair and maintenance?

The main thing is not a saboteur))

[Alexey RA]

Quote: ss-n-22

Yeah. According to the preliminary target designation of the air defense system for reaching the target location of the target. 2 kilometers, according to your own advertiser. And to this distance who will direct it?

The control cabin of the firing division - RCTU, according to data from external sources (yes, the dog is buried big here ).
Yes, the accuracy is not the same, but SAM also does not need to be displayed tightly to the target at the range of the fuse. Active GOS to capture enough to get into the area 2 km from the target.
In principle, medium-range RVS have been working like this for a long time: they go to the ANN with the correction for RCTUs for the main part of the trajectory, and when approaching the target they include ARLGS.

Quote: ss-n-22

So what is the difference between the three and two coordinate radars in the context of target designation?

But from an elevation angle - yes, an ambush. There is a chance that when you turn on the ARLGSN, the target will be higher than the petals of the DOS of the GOS or lower - and there will be no capture.

[DimerVladimer]

Small-caliber "Russian woodpecker" :))

In many countries around the world, “Russian Woodpecker” rained thousands of complaints from companies and ordinary hams. Since the Russian Woodpecker knocked on frequencies protected by international agreements for civilian use, the governments of the USA, Great Britain and Canada protested to the Soviet Union. But the USSR did not even recognize the fact of the Woodpecker. The world community of radio amateurs even made an attempt to suppress the Russian Woodpecker by trying to broadcast rectangular pulses in the opposite phase at the same frequency in order to prevent the Soviet woodpecker-receiver. However, this attempt was unsuccessful.

As for the appointment of the Russian Woodpecker, there were a lot of theories. So, even at the highest level, the theory of mind control was considered. One of the US Department of Defense consultants wrote: “The Russian Woodpecker signal is the most powerful source of electromagnetic radiation ever created by man. 10 pulses per second, 40 million watts, it is psychoactive! It is emitted from the Soviet Union and permeates everything in the USA. It is caught by electric wires and flows into our homes through them. ”In 1988, the US Federal Communications Commission conducted an investigation and finally found out the purpose of the Russian Woodpecker. It turned out that the Russian Woodpecker was a powerful over-the-horizon radar of the Soviet missile attack warning system (SPRN). He tracked the changes in the state of the ionosphere that occur when rocket engines are turned on (the effect of deionization of the ionosphere and a decrease in the reflectivity of HF radio waves).

Western intelligence agencies actively studied other possible effects of the action of the Russian Woodpecker, from weather changes to the destructive effect on people's consciousness, seriously considering the Russian Woodpecker as an experimental weapon of the USSR.

https://www.ruqrz.com/zagorizontnaya-radiolokatsionnaya-stantsiya-zgrls-duga/

[Operator]

Quote: DimerVladimer

"Russian Woodpecker" pounded on frequencies protected by international agreements for civilian use, the governments of the USA, Great Britain and Canada protested to the Soviet Union

Overwhelmed: after the protest, the United States deployed two ZGRLS on its territory, France and Australia - one at a time, China at the moment - two.

[bars1]

Quote: Operator

Catch the third coordinate - ARGS 9Б-1103М2

Operator, I always wanted to ask you why you think that ARGS 9B-1103M2 is with AFAR? You have repeatedly stated this. Judging by the appearance of the 9B-1103M2, it is equipped with a PAR. But not in one booklet the type of antenna is indicated, especially since it is an AFAR. I think that not only I will be grateful to you for the answer!

[Operator]

In another topic, I already gave a detailed description of ARGS 9B-1103M2 from a report from the Army-2019 forum, in the text of which the type of antenna was indicated. The modular AFAR is most likely covered with a radio-transparent cover.

The Internet is full of photos of ARGSN NPO Agat, developed over the past 10-15 years, which show open modular AFARs.

[Armata T-14]

The director general explained that the radar data is designed to detect all types of aerodynamic targets, including aircraft, cruise missiles, hypersonic aircraft and so on. The "container" is capable of controlling flights of any air targets at a distance of about 3 thousand kilometers in a sector of 240 degrees. The radar can simultaneously track more than 5 thousand air objects of various types, including small

Get fucked up. Goodies

[bars1]

Operator, thanks for the answer!

[pafegosoff]

In Pripyat something similar stood. Otherwise, live next to the transmitter ...