Military Review

The S-300В4 air defense brigade kit entered service with the BBO anti-aircraft gunners

57
The Air Defense Forces of the Eastern Military District have been armed with a new S-300В4 anti-aircraft missile system. The equipment from the manufacturer was delivered to the Kapustin Yar training ground, where it will be accepted. This was reported by the press service of the BBO.


The S-300В4 air defense brigade kit entered service with the BBO anti-aircraft gunners


The new S-300В4 air defense brigade kit was handed over to the military air defense base at the Kapustin Yar training ground in the Astrakhan Region. According to the Ministry of Defense, at present, the air defense missile systems calculations have begun to study the material part, the order and basic principles of operation of the units and assemblies of the complex. The coordination of calculations is carried out.

After the training cycle, a tactical exercise with docking firing will be held, during which anti-aircraft gunners will show everything that they have learned. It is planned to work out the transfer of air defense systems from traveling to combat, detection, identification, target tracking and missile launches.

At the end of the exercises, the personnel and military equipment will be sent to the place of permanent deployment.

As the Ministry of Defense explained, the new S-300В4 air defense brigade kit entered the arsenal of the air defense air defense forces for the first time.

The S-300B4 anti-aircraft missile system manufactured by Almaz-Antey Concern East Kazakhstan Joint-Stock Company was created specifically for the Ground Forces and is designed to protect troops during defensive and offensive operations, air defense of military facilities. The complex has three types of weapons. When fighting against ballistic targets C -300В4 is capable of hitting 16 missiles flying at speeds of up to 4500 m / s and is the only missile defense system in the world that can effectively deal with ballistic missiles with a launch range of up to 2500 km. This is the fourth var Iant of modernization of military air defense missile systems S-300V.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. novel66
    novel66 25 October 2019 09: 32 New
    -2
    against the North Koreans deployed ??
    1. kjhg
      kjhg 25 October 2019 09: 43 New
      13
      Not against anyone, but to cover their own troops.
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 25 October 2019 10: 34 New
        +1
        I wonder how many Launchers are in the brigade kit?
        1. asv363
          asv363 25 October 2019 15: 29 New
          +1
          Good day, Sergey.

          Rather, from 3 divisions of 6 (or 8) cars to 4 TPKs. 2x6x4 = 48 PU (TPK), 3x6x4 = 72 TPK, 3x8x4 = 96 TPK or 4x6x4 - the same 96 TPK.
        2. bayard
          bayard 25 October 2019 18: 05 New
          0
          There are at least 4 divisions in the brigade (previously there were 6), but in each division something like this - 8 to 12 PUs.
    2. Victoria-V
      Victoria-V 25 October 2019 09: 43 New
      +2
      Something you have more minuses than readers)
      1. novel66
        novel66 25 October 2019 09: 47 New
        +1
        it's Eun ... there’s no one else like him .. lol
    3. Amurets
      Amurets 25 October 2019 09: 47 New
      +3
      Quote: novel xnumx
      against the North Koreans deployed ??
      In addition to the DPRK, there are enough ill-wishers in the Far East. Japan, USA. eg. The US bases in Japan, South Korea, and the Japanese Self-Defense Forces are full-fledged armed forces. Help for 2011 https://topwar.ru/3472-sootnoshenie-sil-rf-i-yaponii-na-dalnevostochnom-tvd.html
      1. novel66
        novel66 25 October 2019 09: 48 New
        0
        these teeth gave us nothing against us!
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 25 October 2019 09: 55 New
          +3
          Quote: novel xnumx
          these teeth gave us nothing against us!

          There is no one more insidious than the Japanese. They only believe in strength.
          1. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 25 October 2019 13: 51 New
            +3
            More insidious than the Japanese ...

            I traveled to many places
            And I realized not without sadness:
            Jews are loved only there
            Where they have never met.
            I. Huberman
            1. Amurets
              Amurets 26 October 2019 00: 46 New
              0
              Quote: Vlad.by
              More insidious than the Japanese ...

              I traveled to many places
              And I realized not without sadness:
              Jews are loved only there
              Where they have never met.
              I. Huberman

              To the place and very precisely, only the Jews must be replaced by the Japanese. And the Japanese began to show their essence in the REV during the capture of Sakhalin, and in the Civil War, bloody traces stretched from Kamchatka to Transbaikalia ..
    4. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
      SERGEY SERGEEVICS 25 October 2019 10: 12 New
      +3
      Quote: novel xnumx
      against the North Koreans deployed ??

      And what wasn’t necessary? Or you just need to complete the West, and let the East live by itself. The border is much closer to minke whales, and there are bases too.
    5. 1976AG
      1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 22 New
      -2
      Quote: novel xnumx
      against the North Koreans deployed ??

      Are you afraid of the DPRK ?? Found someone to be afraid of ...
      1. novel66
        novel66 25 October 2019 10: 23 New
        +2
        but who knows ... dogs, eat out ..
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 25 New
          +3
          That's just the point, they eat a hunt, not die
        2. Amurets
          Amurets 25 October 2019 10: 39 New
          +1
          Quote: novel xnumx
          but who knows ... dogs, eat them.

          The Chinese too. "Dog meat has long been a popular food in the northeast and south of China and has become popular elsewhere in recent years." https://pikabu.ru/story/kulturyi_narodov_sobaka_kak_eda_v_kitae_6133983
          The French eat frogs, and the Japanese play with death when they cook and eat fugu fish. Many examples can be cited, but it is better this way: "There are no comrades for taste and color."
          1. novel66
            novel66 25 October 2019 10: 46 New
            +1
            that’s how it is, but personally I can’t trust people who eat dogs
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 52 New
              +1
              Quote: novel xnumx
              that’s how it is, but personally I can’t trust people who eat dogs

              And the French generally eat frogs! Is this your normal ?? And blue cheese, God forgive me ..
              1. novel66
                novel66 25 October 2019 10: 53 New
                +3
                frogs and cheese are not human friends
                1. 1976AG
                  1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 55 New
                  +3
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  frogs and cheese are not human friends

                  If you want to live, you’ll not only eat dogs.
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 25 October 2019 10: 57 New
                    +2
                    God forbid so starving ...
                    1. 1976AG
                      1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 59 New
                      0
                      And they are starving that way. But the Americans, the Japanese do not eat like dogs, but do you believe them? Are they reliable partners? Do you believe Ukrainians?
                      1. novel66
                        novel66 25 October 2019 11: 01 New
                        +1
                        it’s intolerant to call Khokhlov Khokhlov ... they are not all bad, most are good
                      2. 1976AG
                        1976AG 25 October 2019 11: 27 New
                        +1
                        and I just do not tolerant and call a spade a spade. And then foreign policy you yourself know who it depends on, so I’m talking about them
                      3. mark1
                        mark1 25 October 2019 12: 10 New
                        0
                        Roman, with humor you are all right good
                      4. novel66
                        novel66 25 October 2019 12: 12 New
                        +1
                        this only saves lol
          2. Nikolaevich I
            Nikolaevich I 25 October 2019 13: 12 New
            +2
            Quote: 1976AG
            And the French generally eat frogs!

            And why are you hanging all the frogs on the French ?! Frogs are eaten in full in the countries of Southeast Asia, for example ... By the way, frogs are very tasty! You are still talking to the "green" about the French that they eat oysters alive! Remember what grandfather Shchukar said? "Oysters, poor things, squeak; and he swallows them alive ...!"
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 25 October 2019 16: 40 New
              -1
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              Quote: 1976AG
              And the French generally eat frogs!

              And why are you hanging all the frogs on the French ?! Frogs are eaten in full in the countries of Southeast Asia, for example ... By the way, frogs are very tasty! You are still talking to the "green" about the French that they eat oysters alive! Remember what grandfather Shchukar said? "Oysters, poor things, squeak; and he swallows them alive ...!"

              It isn’t mine to go crazy. It came to the dogs, I gave other examples. Are the frogs tasty? Koreans will probably say the same about dogs. I just wanted to say that trust cannot depend on a person’s diet (unless of course he is a cannibal). And here the topic was fanned ...
              1. Nikolaevich I
                Nikolaevich I 25 October 2019 17: 22 New
                +2
                Quote: 1976AG
                To go nuts is not mine

                Yes, I am "slightly joking"! When in Southeast Asia, "whom" only I did not eat! Starting from frogs, snakes, crocodiles, ostriches and insects in "assortment". And nothing ! An innate bias towards "food" makes itself felt only at the beginning of the "culinary story"!
  • Victoria-V
    Victoria-V 25 October 2019 09: 41 New
    +2
    But what about the famous statement of General Alexander Luzan? http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/
  • Observer2014
    Observer2014 25 October 2019 09: 47 New
    +3
    Who realties is able to clearly explain why in almost all Russian media outlets as conspirators compare the American "Patriot" with the S 400 and not with this S-300V4 air defense system, for example? What is so outstanding about their "Patriot" is that it is with the C 400 that in fact in all even the main news resources they compare what is generally difficult to compare.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 25 October 2019 10: 23 New
      +3
      Have you seen a lot of specialists in our media?
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 25 October 2019 10: 28 New
        +1
        Quote: 1976AG
        Have you seen a lot of specialists in our media?

        Really. hi
    2. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 10: 35 New
      +2
      Capabilities of the S-300V4:
      - ballistic missiles of tactical, operational-tactical classes (TBR, OTDB) and medium-range (BRRS) with a launch range of 2500 km or less and a flight speed of the warheads up to 4500 m / s (that is, a hypersonic speed of more than 12 M);

      - all types of aerodynamic targets at ranges up to 380-400 km, including those made using the Stealth technology (the minimum image intensifier of the affected targets is 0,01 m2).
      S-300B4 should be compared in theory with the THAAD system. Veda was once created in the USSR by the S-300B1 to intercept Pershing specifically, but the S-400 is just as popular as the Patriot MIM-104. And journalists in Africa are journalists. The idea is to compare Patriot with S-350. They have similar capabilities .
      1. san4es
        san4es 25 October 2019 11: 41 New
        +3
        Capabilities of the S-300V4: .....

        hi ... S-300V4 - brigade anti-aircraft missile system. The C-300B4 air defense system provides for the simultaneous destruction of 16 ballistic missiles and 24 aerodynamic targets at ranges of up to 400 km. Enhanced combat capabilities are achieved through new components, a modern elemental base and computing facilities.
        According to the Director General of Almaz-Antey, Jan Novikov, the new anti-aircraft missile system “has an expanded area that is two to three times hidden from air strikes and an increased range of the border of the zone of destruction of air targets. These parameters provide guaranteed interception of the warheads of medium-range ballistic missiles. "
    3. Amurets
      Amurets 25 October 2019 10: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: Observer2014
      Who realties is able to clearly explain why in almost all Russian media outlets as conspirators compare the American "Patriot" with the S 400 and not with this S-300V4 air defense system, for example?

      Short. "Patriot" and S-400 are object air defense systems, S-300V4 are army air defense systems. They have different tasks.
      The Air Defense Forces are assigned the following main tasks:
      carrying out combat duty on air defense;
      reconnaissance of the air enemy and the notification of covered forces;
      destruction of enemy air attack assets in flight;
      participation in missile defense in theaters of war. [1]
      Objective air defense: The objectives of the air defense missile defense are:

      repulsion of aggression in the aerospace sphere and protection from attacks by means of an aerospace attack of the enemy by command posts of the highest echelons of state and military command, troops (forces), administrative and political centers, and industrial and economic regions
    4. Out
      Out 25 October 2019 10: 58 New
      +1
      They have a different purpose - the C 400 changes the S300P and its modifications, while the S300V seems to be replaced by nothing
  • IAI-Azerbaijan
    IAI-Azerbaijan 25 October 2019 09: 59 New
    -1
    Quote: Observer2014
    Who realties is able to clearly explain why in almost all Russian media outlets as conspirators compare the American "Patriot" with the S 400 and not with this S-300V4 air defense system, for example? What is so outstanding about their "Patriot" is that it is with the C 400 that in fact in all even the main news resources they compare what is generally difficult to compare.

    Is the S-400 better than the B4 against missiles?
    Do they use the same missiles, or are they larger in B4? (Just the containers of the B4 missiles are visually larger.)
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 10: 53 New
      +1
      They (S-300B4 and S-400) generally have different missiles and even different principles for guiding these missiles. Opposite the missiles, the S-300B4 is better. Since this is a new version of the S-300B1 Pershing specially designed to intercept the Pershing.
      The representative of the concern clarified that the S-300V4 will be able to use a small missile 9M83M, a large 9M82MD and an "intermediate" 9M82M with a range of up to 200 km. According to him, the 9M82MD is designed to intercept aerodynamic targets at a distance of up to 400 km, as well as the main types of ballistic targets, including warheads of medium-range ballistic missiles flying at speeds of up to 4,5 thousand m / s.

      https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3608589
    2. Pavel57
      Pavel57 25 October 2019 10: 53 New
      -1
      Do not compare containers in the stowed position.))
    3. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 11: 02 New
      -2
      For comparison, the S-400 missiles are true export, but so that you understand the difference.
      Compared with the previous generation, the S-400 "Triumph" air defense system has significantly greater tactical and technical capabilities, providing more than a twofold increase in efficiency. Triumph is the only system that can selectively operate using at least 5 types of missiles (48N6E, 48N6E2, 48N6EZ, 9M96E2 and 40N6E), which have different launch weights and launch ranges, creating an echeloned defense.

      https://vpk.name/library/f/c-400.html
  • SERGEY SERGEEVICS
    SERGEY SERGEEVICS 25 October 2019 10: 04 New
    +1
    This is another matter that the East also began to replenish.
  • IAI-Azerbaijan
    IAI-Azerbaijan 25 October 2019 11: 06 New
    -1
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    They (S-300B4 and S-400) generally have different missiles and even different principles for guiding these missiles. Against missiles, the S-300B4 is better.

    So I think, why is it always praising the C400 that they forget about the B4 and Antei-2500? This also applies to foreign buyers of the C400, who either do not know that there are also B4 and Antey 2500, or they simply do not sell them, like the C400. Even in export version. (Although what exactly is the Export modification of Russian weapons - I am sure almost no one really knows for sure. In one case, it is truncated, in the other it turns out even better than those supplied to the Russian army. (That is, the amount offered by the buyer decides a lot, especially in time of crisis for the Russian Federation, and this, of course, concerns the Allies, and let's say Friends. Not all of course.)
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 11: 21 New
      -1
      So I think, why is it always praising the C400 that they forget about the B4 and Antei-2500? This also applies to foreign buyers of the C400, who either do not know that there are also B4 and Antey 2500, or they simply do not sell them, like the C400.

      This is how to ask why everyone wants to buy the Patriot MIM-104, and not the THAAD missile defense. Because until recently (Iran, North Korea tests) few people were interested in missile defense capabilities against missile defense. All needed air defense in the person of S-400, Patriot, and not a missile defense system in the person of THAAD and S-300B4, although I think the S-300B4 was offered to the same Iran, but he chose S-300PMU-2 (or S-300PMU -1) if I’m not mistaken. This is how generally rather poor countries prefer lightweight single-engine fighter, not a heavy Su-35, the capabilities of which are unnecessary for many.
      1. IAI-Azerbaijan
        IAI-Azerbaijan 25 October 2019 12: 09 New
        -4
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        So I think, why is it always praising the C400 that they forget about the B4 and Antei-2500? This also applies to foreign buyers of the C400, who either do not know that there are also B4 and Antey 2500, or they simply do not sell them, like the C400.

        This is how to ask why everyone wants to buy the Patriot MIM-104, and not the THAAD missile defense. Because until recently (Iran, North Korea tests) few people were interested in missile defense capabilities against missile defense. All needed air defense in the person of S-400, Patriot, and not a missile defense system in the person of THAAD and S-300B4, although I think the S-300B4 was offered to the same Iran, but he chose S-300PMU-2 (or S-300PMU -1) if I’m not mistaken. This is how generally rather poor countries prefer lightweight single-engine fighter, not a heavy Su-35, the capabilities of which are unnecessary for many.

        When I say among my own that Russia has C300 variants that are better than C400, they laugh.))
        And yet, I think all the same, the C300BM and B4 are not direct competitors to Thaad and Arrow3. The latter are exclusively kinetic missiles. And moreover, modern. But VM and B4 are the USSR’s last word in air defense (apart from the mine-based interceptors, of course, they cannot repulse a massive attack.) They deserve respect.
        But IMHO Putin's "bluff", under the name S400, in particular their "export modifications" - I don't understand.
        May God grant more than C300 on duty, as well as BM and B4. (By the way, Russia sent Syria to Syria, i.e., to its base in Syria, after the Israelis and others didn’t get scared of the S300, and continued to attack. This leads me to some thoughts about the USSR’s masterpiece, the S400 (the best modifications), and Putin’s S300. As I said above, everything is IMHO. No offense.
        1. Andy
          Andy 25 October 2019 12: 30 New
          -3
          Quote: IAI-Azerbaijan
          Russia sent Syria to Syria, i.e. to its bases in Syria, after the Israelis, etc., were not afraid of the Sy300, and continued to attack. This leads me to some thoughts about the USSR's masterpiece brainchild - the S400 (the best modifications), and the Putin S300.

          the matter is not masterpiece; the matter is permission for military use. gave the order to shoot or not. from here and still afraid of the enemy or outrageous
        2. Sky strike fighter
          Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 21: 00 New
          0
          Quote: IAI-Azerbaijan
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          So I think, why is it always praising the C400 that they forget about the B4 and Antei-2500? This also applies to foreign buyers of the C400, who either do not know that there are also B4 and Antey 2500, or they simply do not sell them, like the C400.

          This is how to ask why everyone wants to buy the Patriot MIM-104, and not the THAAD missile defense. Because until recently (Iran, North Korea tests) few people were interested in missile defense capabilities against missile defense. All needed air defense in the person of S-400, Patriot, and not a missile defense system in the person of THAAD and S-300B4, although I think the S-300B4 was offered to the same Iran, but he chose S-300PMU-2 (or S-300PMU -1) if I’m not mistaken. This is how generally rather poor countries prefer lightweight single-engine fighter, not a heavy Su-35, the capabilities of which are unnecessary for many.

          When I say among my own that Russia has C300 variants that are better than C400, they laugh.))
          And yet, I think all the same, the C300BM and B4 are not direct competitors to Thaad and Arrow3. The latter are exclusively kinetic missiles. And moreover, modern. But VM and B4 are the USSR’s last word in air defense (apart from the mine-based interceptors, of course, they cannot repulse a massive attack.) They deserve respect.
          But IMHO Putin's "bluff", under the name S400, in particular their "export modifications" - I don't understand.
          May God grant more than C300 on duty, as well as BM and B4. (By the way, Russia sent Syria to Syria, i.e., to its base in Syria, after the Israelis and others didn’t get scared of the S300, and continued to attack. This leads me to some thoughts about the USSR’s masterpiece, the S400 (the best modifications), and Putin’s S300. As I said above, everything is IMHO. No offense.

          Here you are wrong. The Soviet S-300V1 had a maximum range of damage of 100 km. The S-300V4 is not Soviet, but the newest Russian missile defense system, with a maximum range of 400 km. By the way, the military S-300V4 has no connection with the object S-300PMU. -1, S-300PMU-2. Absolutely different systems. The S-400 is also a relatively modern Russian air defense system. And not as you put it "bluff". Why the Israelis were not frightened in the quote below.
          And yet the S-300PMU2 lags far behind the more modern Russian S-300V4 and S-400 Triumphs, as well as the Chinese HQ-9B.

          The S-300PMU2 system is capable of detecting and striking stealth aircraft, but the more modern S-300V4 and S-400 cope with these tasks better. The ability of "Favorite" to shoot down the American fifth-generation fighter F-22 Raptor, which can boast of high speed, excellent maneuverability and the presence of electronic warfare systems, are questioned. Against the slower and less stealthy F-35, the S-300PMU2 has a much better chance. However, the "meeting" of the Syrian anti-aircraft missile systems with the F-22 is unlikely - most likely, they will have to collide with the F-35 and various aircraft of the fourth generation.

          So, the S-300PMU2 lags behind not only the S-400, but also the more modern S-300 variants. This suggests that Moscow is increasing the volume of military support for Damascus, but this situation is far from escalating in the early 1980s, when the USSR handed over to Syria one of the most modern air defense systems at that time. Yet the Favorite is a serious threat to the fourth generation aircraft, which, for the most part, comprise the Israeli and NATO air forces. In addition, they are dangerous for more modern F-35s.

          https://vpk.name/news/229671_favorit_protiv_triumfa_s300pmu2_i_s400_sravnili_mezhdu_soboi.html
        3. Sky strike fighter
          Sky strike fighter 25 October 2019 21: 16 New
          0
          Compare the capabilities of the S-300B1 with the capabilities of the S-300B4, the data on the latter I cited in the post above. The data on the S-300B1 in the quote below.
          Apparently, the answer to this threat is the S-300 B1, which can hit ground-to-ground cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as air targets traveling at speeds of up to 3 thousand m / s (about 11 thousand km / h). The range of this system can reach 100 km.

          http://argumentua.com/stati/gotova-li-ukrainskaya-sistema-pvo-k-polnomasshtabnoi-voine-s-rossiei
          In 1991, Ukraine had two missile brigades armed with S-300V1 air defense systems. 8 years ago they were disbanded, and the complexes were sent for storage. Storage was with the effect of "shrinkage and shaking." As a result, the most serious 9M82 anti-aircraft missiles, responsible for intercepting ballistic missiles, became completely unusable. And everything else, including the radar, was able to "refresh". That is, certain measures were taken, as a result of which the resource of the complexes was extended. Although it has already expired.

          As a result, the firing range of the complex decreased from the passport 100 kilometers (the 9M82 missile gave so much) to 72 kilometers. The absence of a farther and faster 9M82 missile significantly reduced the chances of hitting high-speed targets after them. The 9M83 rocket, upgraded by Ukrainians, develops a speed of 3,6 M. Whereas the 9M82 rocket has a speed of 5,7 M.

          The target interception altitude has also been reduced from 30 km to 22 km. This is again due to the absence of the 9M82 rocket, in which aerodynamic rudders work more efficiently due to their higher speed.

          Fully equipped with air defense systems, the S-300V1 was capable of intercepting Pershing-1 medium-range ballistic missiles.

          https://svpressa.ru/war21/article/215697/
  • Old26
    Old26 25 October 2019 14: 24 New
    +1
    Quote: 1976AG
    And the French generally eat frogs! Is this your normal ?? And blue cheese, God forgive me ..

    Fine. And their taste is quite normal. Unless, of course, do not turn around that this is a frog. And blue cheese - the taste is also normal. In our city in the late 80s, Roquefort was often on sale. So grandma tried to wash off the mold laughing
    So the taste and color - all the markers are different.
    The Chinese, for example, eat snakes and crawls flying around, such as silkworms or locusts. And we are cracking beef and pork, which from the point of view of Hindus and Muslims is generally blasphemy ...
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 25 October 2019 17: 22 New
      +2
      But for some comrades, the diet may turn out to be a criterion of trust in the people !!!
  • Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 25 October 2019 17: 28 New
    +2
    Well .... the S-300V4 is very good, especially with the 9M82MV missile defense system with an active "radar" seeker and a "range" of up to 350 km ...
  • shurik
    shurik 26 October 2019 09: 08 New
    0
    The complex is armed with three types.

    How's that?
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 26 October 2019 09: 56 New
      -1
      The S-300V4 has three types of missiles. Large 9M82MD (400km), "intermediate" 9M82M (200km), and small 9M83M ranges.
      1. shurik
        shurik 26 October 2019 10: 09 New
        0
        I know this (served in the S-300B1 ZRBr), BUT the article simply says there are three types. and DOT, that's what I mean.
        1. Sky strike fighter
          Sky strike fighter 26 October 2019 10: 55 New
          -1
          The complex is armed with three types. In the fight against ballistic targets, the S-300B4 is capable of hitting 16 missiles flying at speeds of up to 4500 m / s.

          Here is this segment? Forgot to add the word "missiles". That is, it should have been written: "The complex is armed with three types of missiles." Well, further there is a description of the capabilities of the system.
    2. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 26 October 2019 10: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: Shurik
      The complex is armed with three types.

      How's that?

      And the fick knows what is in the Author's head! For the S-300 V ... 2 types of missiles were created: 9M 82/83 ... By and large, there was only one "type": 9M83-single-stage "conical" zur ... 9M82 was obtained by adding an additional launch stage to 9M83 ... Then modifications of these missiles were created ...: 9M82M / 83M ... then 9M82MV / 83MV ... S-300V4 and left in service and in production largely due to the fact that the problems encountered in the development of the 40N6 air defense missile for the S-400 air defense system, the adoption of the mentioned SAM was delayed ..., and the 9M82MV air defense missile with a range of up to 350 km was ready much earlier! By the way, the option of arming the S-300 B4 with a 40N6 missile was also considered, later ... There is also an interesting option: control of the Buk-M3 complex with the S-300V PU ...