Landing without borders: parachutes and parachute systems

The development and creation of parachutes and parachute systems is today extremely demanded by the state and the armed forces. For more than ten years, no new parachute systems (PS) for special units have appeared in the Russian army. Today, this industry constantly receives government orders for the development and modernization of existing substations. Recently, there have been many new products. Parachutes that were created hundreds of years ago were transformed into high-tech products, and the army is most often the engine of progress in this case.

For both cargo and people, modern parachutes are wings that allow jumping from beyond heights and travel tens of kilometers in flight from the place of release, and high-precision heavyweight parachutes with which you can land with a mortar, and unusual dog trainers with dogs , heavy duty domes for launching spacecraft and other options. Without them, it will not be possible to safely and accurately descend, in the literal sense, from heaven to earth.

The program "Military Acceptance" will show many innovative parachute systems created on the instructions of the best special forces of the country. In the video, you can see a dozen parachute systems that were previously exhibited only at closed shows:

Comments

[raw174]

Yes, the specialists need systems through which they can get out of the board extremely high and land tens of kilometers away ... But I'm wondering when, over the past decades, a successful mass amphibious operation was carried out in combat conditions ... In other words, the concept " from heaven to earth and immediately into battle ", relevant? In my opinion, no ... I do not think that in modern conditions it is possible to parachute a more or less large unit, no matter how close to the enemy ...

[Prisoner]

You can safely take time intervals of more than a decade. Parachute landing of large units is essentially sending for slaughter. Probably, when it is required to quickly redeploy a unit on its territory from one theater of operations to another, while ensuring that the ejection is blocked both from the ground and from the air, it makes sense.

[Chaldon48]

And the man and equipment being suspended from the parachute’s bathtub become completely helpless, the maneuverability is practically zero and if the enemy is below, then surely many parachutists will be injured or killed in the air, and the equipment will become a welcome trap for him.

[stalki]

And the man and equipment being suspended from the parachute’s bathtub become completely helpless, the maneuverability is practically zero and if the enemy is below, then surely many parachutists will be injured or killed in the air, and the equipment will become a welcome trap for him.

In a row whether landing will be carried out on the enemy. And it goes without saying that there will be artillery preparation and cover on the bridgehead.

[raw174]

Quote: stalki

In a row whether landing will be carried out on the enemy. And it goes without saying that there will be artillery preparation and cover on the bridgehead.

I listened to an interview with one gallant colonel of the Airborne Forces, who smartly reported that in the event of a war, our Airborne Forces would be thrown into the rear of the enemy by air and there they would bring chaos and confusion ... And I immediately thought that the transport workers would not reach the rear of the enemy ... We were also taught, the coast is "ironed out" from the ships, the large landing craft lands a landing, and part of the landing is thrown into the rear, we take the enemy in ticks and that's it, it remains to put the squeeze on, gain a foothold and wait for the main forces to approach ... In the 20s - 30s , would have worked, but not now.

[stalki]

And I thought right away that the transport workers would not reach the rear of the enemy ... We were also taught, the coast is "ironed out" from the ships, the large landing craft lands a landing, and part of the landing is thrown into the rear, we take the enemy in ticks and that's it, it remains to put the squeeze on, gain a foothold and wait for the main forces to approach ... In the 20s - 30s, it would have worked, but not now.

Ironing can now be done not only from the ship, but also from airplanes and missile systems, and thoroughly. Jamming enemy radars, and intelligence technologies have changed, information can be received in real time. So landing can be quite relevant and effective, if wisely.

[Jerk]

The same Makar, we can say that the coast will also always be toothy than the ships. The ship is a healthy, iron fool, you can see it from afar, and one Ball machine - but figs you can see it! Technique on the water? Stupidly a target. Marines on the bare sand ?! Well, it’s not even buried, with all desire ...

[Chaldon48]

Anything can happen in the war, no one says that our command will do it on purpose, send people to certain death, but in the war everyone tries to outwit the enemy, and sometimes serious mistakes can happen in a hurry. So my father only miraculously did not die after falling under the bombs from our own aircraft. Part of it moved too far forward, but did not have time to tell the exact coordinates.

[tol100v]

Quote: raw174

But I’m wondering

The percentage of "Oaks" and "Crossbows" is just interesting !? It just tells about the speed of re-equipment and training in the troops!

[tso1973]

But the Crossbow is not a replacement for D-6 and D-10, it is in addition, but the replacement should be D-12 Listik, but nothing has been heard about him for a long time.

[Bogatyrev]

The use of VTA with more or less effective enemy air defense is impossible.
But still, such an operation is relevant. With appropriate training, reconnaissance and cover. It's just that the landing concept is completely different.

[kunstkammer]

Moreover, the engine of progress in this case is most often the army.

but I guessed ... it’s not just that, you know, the army is speaking! How, without a nanny, darling, to transfer the economy to civilian products?
Just now I thought, why, here and there, for the Red Army sophisticated equipment? Vaughn T-14 what a bang! Sit down, ride - I don't want to! Come and Wai-yo-fi is there? After all, every soldier (foreign) without this Yo-Fay ... well, just the edge will come. Fact! Though surrender, surrender. Fortunately, they say, in Moscow ... ts ... in the Metro ... it already exists! We saw him ... Well, not a soldier ...
And for my hard worker, I’ll say frankly, it will do. Do you know who he looks like? Yes, not a hard worker, but our tank? The most bumpy in the world and its environs. Well, if in profile of course? Right! Typically a potato harvester! He sat in it ... gently touched the joystick ... oh, oh well ... you are talking about something else! Twisted. like a little carousel and .... go, my dear, pick up potatoes in a string bag. Necha without slippers the collective farm dust in the iron house to drag ...
Progress.

[Ros 56]

The parachutes that were created hundreds of years ago,

Authors, but in more detail, how many hundreds of years ago parachutes were created (not the idea of ​​Leonardo da Vinci)?

[Donald72]

The last known to me successful disant operation of 2014. Crimean peninsula. Yes, a demon of powders, but landing from the sea, from helicopters. Both are beautiful targets. Lose no tasks completed. It is possible to prove to participants about impossibility of current in modern conditions.

[raw174]

Quote: Donald72

but landing from the sea, from helicopters

On a completely controlled bridgehead, with the full loyalty of the local ... Not an indicator ... In principle, the available base forces would have been enough, only specialists were needed, but decided to play it safe ...

[Donald72]

Who prepared the Pladzdarm? And the large population with bits and on a foreign land is not a very hindrance.

[raw174]

Quote: Donald72

Who prepared the Pladzdarm? And the large population with bits and on a foreign land is not a very hindrance.

History prepared this springboard, it also consists not only in the absence of means of defeating the enemy, but also in the warm welcome of the locals, our land there didn’t burn underfoot, it differs from the ukromaydannye ... I know the mood of the Crimeans firsthand, I know who they respect - Russian sailor, and if the flag, then ours, Andreevsky! It was not the military that returned the Crimea, they essentially ensured order, law and security, and the Crimeans returned it.

[Donald72]

No offense against the truth. The soldiers did not come to a foreign land and were welcomed. I just notice that the forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Crimea were and was a real disant operation. So there are situations in the modern world where disant is possible and necessary.