In India, explained why the elite Su-35 can win a tender for 12 billion dollars

53
Su-35 can become not only a means of replenishing the Indian Air Force with a powerful "heavyweight", but also a unique opportunity to modernize the Su-30MKI fleet. Why the elite Su-35 can win a tender for 12 billion dollars, the Indian media tried to explain.





Unrivaled Heavyweight


According to Indian Defense News, which published special material, the Russian fighter for gaining air superiority of the “4 ++ generation” Su-35 “Flanker” stands out among seven bidders for the supply of an average multi-purpose combat aircraft of the Indian Air Force as the only heavy platform and the only machine specializing in airborne control battlefield.

Given its large mass, the Su-35, placed a line above, in the circle of the "elite", surpasses all other bidders in the entire spectrum of characteristics: in payload, range and altitude, and equipment power. For the same reason, it has increased maneuverability and speed (which MiG-35 has among the applicants only), since its dimensions made it possible to install an engine with a controlled thrust vector. This is the only aircraft participating in the tender that is able to carry hypersonic air-to-air missiles.

But, according to Indian Defense News, despite the relatively low cost and high performance, the key disadvantage of the Su-35 compared to lighter jet aircraft, such as the MiG-35 and Rafal, are increased maintenance requirements and operating costs. which possibly makes it less competitive compared to medium fighters.



Russia declared ready to transfer technology


However, according to the publication, if you link the proposal for the production of 114 units. Su-35 in India with the possibility of modernizing the existing fleet of more than 250 units in the country other "heavyweights" Su-30MKI, the Russian proposal may well compensate for the shortcomings of higher operating costs.

Allegedly, the KLA of the Russian Federation proposed to provide under the contract a number of Su-35 technologies that can be used to modernize the Indian Su-30 fleet, which will significantly improve their flight performance. Moreover, many of the systems will be produced in India itself.

As the publication explains, the potential contract stipulates that the engines and other systems installed on the Su-35 will be integrated into the Indian Su-30, which will make the two aircraft substantially similar and, accordingly, compatible. This, in turn, can lead to less burdensome maintenance and lower net maintenance costs fleet heavyweight fighters. This option cannot be offered by any other bidder, Indian Defense News believes.

Although Su-35 is likely to be one of the three main contenders, the unique opportunity to improve due to its existing Indian fleet of Su-30 India [...] may well make it a leading challenger

- concludes the edition.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    53 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +13
      20 October 2019 15: 14
      But what about the 5th generation gypsy ?!
      1. +16
        20 October 2019 15: 21
        They meant the Su-35. This will be their fifth generation!
        1. +4
          20 October 2019 16: 47
          All Indians like everything. A great reason to bargain for ten years ....
          1. +15
            20 October 2019 18: 10
            They will choose the option which will have a stronger lobby in India.
            And the statement regarding the expensive maintenance of the SU-35 regarding other options is very doubtful, it seems that everything is exactly the opposite.
            So if for garlic, then he has no competitors.
            1. +4
              20 October 2019 19: 50
              He eats more Kerasin, but this can’t be principle for spare parts, they are cheaper because they are made with us, and not with the French.
              1. +1
                22 October 2019 12: 07
                first, what is kerAsin?
                secondly, the cost of spare parts is weakly related to their selling value
                10-15 intermediaries, 70% of taxes and it doesn’t matter where they did what.
                thirdly, 2 engines are installed not only for power, but also for combat stability
                this is especially true for naval aviation - there is very little joy in being left without an engine.
                and moderate consumption, because A fighter is capable of flying over 1800 km without hanging tanks.
                1. 0
                  22 October 2019 12: 31
                  Well, if 15 intermediaries then it’s definitely not important. Rafal, he also has two engines, as well as f18 and eurofighter.
    2. +12
      20 October 2019 15: 15
      The Hindus, it seems, have already made their choice. But do not feed them bread - let bargain. What they, according to tradition, do all the time. For the benefit of myself, of course.
      1. +9
        20 October 2019 15: 54
        It seems that our manufacturers are perfectly accustomed to this feature of the Indians.
        And this skill is currently a non-competitive advantage.
        However, this is only verbal.
        We will observe the continuation of the next Bollywood story.
    3. +11
      20 October 2019 15: 15
      There is only one drawback; the Indians see both hands not only crooked, but also left. . planes need to be able to competently operate and maintain, and not hack, accusing Russia of the excessive complexity of aircraft for repairs. Fly on the Wimans, if you can build them. Or armored with three layers of colored straw deltoplana. ..
      1. +19
        20 October 2019 16: 14
        Actually, Berezhlivy, Indian pilots have one of the largest annual air raids in the world, up to 250 hours a year (hence a lot of accidents in the air). They "beat" in training battles Americans, British, etc. F-15, F-16, Typhoons, etc. lost practice battles to them. The Indians even managed to "beat" them on the MiG-21. hi
        1. +1
          20 October 2019 16: 18
          Quote: Kasym
          They "beat" Americans, British, etc. in training battles.


          They they saidthat were beaten in training battles of Americans, British, etc.
          1. +11
            20 October 2019 16: 27
            "CopeIndia 2004", "RedFlag 2008" in the USA, etc .. Search on the Internet, there are many articles from different authors. hi
            1. -3
              20 October 2019 21: 46
              Quote: Kasym
              "CopeIndia 2004", "RedFlag 2008" in the USA, etc .. Search on the Internet, there are many articles from different authors.


              I read them (not all, but some). Quote about Cope India:


              "the air engagements typically involved six Eagles against up to eighteen IAF aircraft with no chance to simulate any beyond visual range (BVR) missile shot (due to the Indian request of not using the AMRAAM). Furthemore, the Indians had sent their most experienced airmen to fight against the Americans whereas the latter belonged to a standard squadron (hence there was a mix of experienced and less experienced pilots) ".


              Here is what the American said about the composition of the pilots:


              Ours were a mix of 80-20 - 80 percent with low experience, less than 500 hours on the F-15, the remaining 20 were fairly experienced but they came back from a staff appointment so they really hadn't had a lot of time flying.


              Those. to put the enemy is put into deliberately losing conditions, and then talk about victory.

              And about RedFlag 2008 there is a very different "report" of the Americans from the Indian one. Who lies less is not clear.
        2. +2
          20 October 2019 16: 30
          250 a year, vague doubts torment me. NATO believes that 120 to 40 hours a year is enough to maintain a normal pilot qualification, but it is noted that this is a little expensive. Are Indians almost twice as big? What about motor resources? If four pilots fly on one airplane, does it mean average repair every year? Every three years - kapitalka?
          1. +5
            20 October 2019 18: 21
            I can’t say anything by the deadlines, but the appropriate equipment comes to our factory for capitalization regularly. But not three year old. So we feed to a large extent .....
          2. +10
            20 October 2019 19: 12
            Nikolai, served at the airfield at the Union. So, our school, which we served, had 300 days of combat a year (we served the regiments in Lugovoy, Kant, Tokmak and Frunze) in two shifts. That is, almost all working days. And this is only for application. But there are also flying skills, and aerial targets, and night flights. In short, it took at least 50 hours for the minimum possession of the technique. (in Ukraine until 14, for example). So that the pilot could do more than takeoff and landing - 150-170h., You can talk about flying skills at 200h .. The average flight time of an "ordinary" pilot at the peak of the power of the USSR was just over 300h .. "Good" pilots up to 400h., "Masters" up to 500h "Asy" up to 600h ..
            Now we only support the form. hi
            Take, for example, the Su-24. What ammunition can I use? Over 30 units of various ammunition (only 7 bombs and this is not adjustable). Try to train without flying.
            1. +1
              20 October 2019 19: 28
              Kasym (Dauren)

              Hi!
              Well, you buddy, "a little" bent about the raid of flight personnel in the USSR)))
              Less "slightly".
              1. +4
                20 October 2019 19: 42
                Nikolay, welcome! Once a major (assistant RP at the training ground) asked. He said that he had 350 hours. But this is an instructor.
                And so, that he dug in various articles with a slight decrease. And, of course, we are talking about pilots of fighter-bombers. It’s clear that there are fewer bombers.
                But I would not downplay the capabilities of the Indians. Those PRCs and Pakistan have borders and are forced to keep flight crew in good shape. hi
                You know better of course.
            2. +2
              20 October 2019 19: 40
              With all due respect, do not confuse warm with soft. Under the Union, they did not spare money on defense. Allocated as much as necessary. The Indians have a slightly different situation. Firstly, the budget is not bottomless, and secondly, engines are only capitalized in Russia, i.e. additional expenses. Despite the fact that it is necessary to have a sufficient number of boards in the ranks, if the situation goes into the hot phase.
            3. 0
              21 October 2019 09: 52
              If you do not use the simulators widely, then no raid will be enough to learn how to use the whole variety of modern weapons.
          3. +2
            20 October 2019 19: 17
            Indians fly a lot.
            Therefore, their su-30 engine kits are replaced 2-3 times
            during the service of the aircraft. Auditors cried and swore that the Su-30 costs them
            more than $ 100 million apiece, including engine overhauls.
            Hence the tender for single-engine fighter jets.
            1. -1
              21 October 2019 09: 53
              Quote: voyaka uh

              Hence the tender for single-engine fighter jets.

              But we cannot offer them anything.
        3. 0
          21 October 2019 00: 12
          but in non-teaching, somehow this is not realized ....
    4. +3
      20 October 2019 15: 17
      In general, the Indians are looking for a way out of the stalemate ...
    5. +4
      20 October 2019 15: 20
      Well then, why are they pulling the cat by the tail, they would have taken it and bought it, they’ll be late everywhere and will fly on the MIG-21, although this is a perfect fighter, but yesterday it can’t meet modern requirements by quite a few criteria.
    6. +5
      20 October 2019 15: 27
      Yeah ....... An airfield surrounded by "skyscrapers" is a discomfort not only for residents, but also for pilots. And the Su-35 is one admiration. good
      1. 0
        20 October 2019 21: 38
        Quote: askort154
        And the Su-35 is one admiration. good

        Yes, maneuvers in the air, as if turning off gravity! Peerless !!! good hi
    7. +3
      20 October 2019 15: 30
      If they were guided by logic, they would have long been armed with the best fighters.
    8. +7
      20 October 2019 15: 41
      It’s dangerous to buy something from Europe, if the Yankees impose sanctions, then the West will immediately support them with all the consequences for India .. I hope that the Indians understand this.
    9. +4
      20 October 2019 15: 41
      Well, Indians, as always, give that, give that, do the opposite laughing
    10. +4
      20 October 2019 16: 04
      Technology cannot be transferred! Only the finished product.
      1. +2
        20 October 2019 17: 18
        Does this mean not to sell?
    11. 0
      20 October 2019 16: 13
      And what is the joy? When in their army - 68 pieces ?? And it seems that there will be no more. Dodges on the sale of the English protectorate, and even with the transfer of technology - what are you, Indians? It seems so.
      1. +3
        20 October 2019 20: 11
        In terms of at least 90 should already be. There was an order for 48, it was completed, and then another 50 until 2020.
    12. +6
      20 October 2019 16: 13
      they will collect the curved-handed Indians of the su-35, which will fall, and then they will whine that the dryers are falling. so it was with the su-30mki
    13. -5
      20 October 2019 16: 20
      Su-35 can easily be upgraded to the 5th generation, and then it's not 4 +++ but 5+.
      Aircraft and a rating of 5+.
      There are simply no other options for India, if you discard the policy of course.
      1. +9
        20 October 2019 17: 02
        Su-35 can easily be upgraded to the 5th generation, and then it's not 4 +++ but 5+.
        how is it? stealth for the 5th generation has not been canceled yet, for this you need to redo the entire su-35 glider from scratch, in the end we get the su-57
    14. +3
      20 October 2019 16: 28
      "[Su-35] has increased maneuverability and speed (which is higher among the contenders only for the MiG-35)"

      The maneuverability and speed of the Su-35 is higher than that of the MiG-35, so the adjective “others” should be added to the word “challengers”.
      1. +1
        21 October 2019 18: 36
        It even comes to the Hindus that you need to have the same equipment, and not a zoo from different planes .. And yes, if the contract with the SU-35 burns out, then the MIG-35 can be closed .. Nobody needs it ..
    15. +1
      20 October 2019 16: 56
      Quote: Nycomed
      Technology cannot be transferred! Only the finished product.

      There’s no other way. They set the conditions .. recourse
    16. +1
      20 October 2019 18: 21
      Well, what kind of technology to sell if, if you want to take it, then let them buy ready-made cars, the West doesn’t squander technology in addition to technology. Oh yes, but what if the Indians don’t take it, and don’t care, others will take it. And so to each buyer to make such gifts, well it is ...
      1. 0
        20 October 2019 20: 15
        You can sell the wheel manufacturing technology, or screwdriver assembly.
    17. +4
      20 October 2019 19: 20
      Yes, sell at least 20 to Pakistan at a normal price and the Indians themselves will crawl on their knees !!!)))) Although they are our old friends!)
    18. +1
      20 October 2019 20: 12
      The country today-tomorrow war is possible, but they are still clever
    19. +1
      20 October 2019 20: 20
      I hope that the tender will still win in an instant, they need orders like air. Well, dry would not be bad
    20. 0
      21 October 2019 00: 02
      Quote: maxim947
      They will choose the option which will have a stronger lobby in India.
      And the statement regarding the expensive maintenance of the SU-35 regarding other options is very doubtful, it seems that everything is exactly the opposite.
      So if for garlic, then he has no competitors.

      agree drinks and the F-16 batch service will be the most expensive, they’ll get tired of paying for upgrades, as the minke whales deliberately delay delivery, which means accelerating the obsolescence of technologies
    21. +1
      21 October 2019 15: 46
      Is Rafaley's service cheaper?
      Killed laughing
    22. 0
      22 October 2019 12: 56
      Quote: Kasym
      "Asy" up to 600h

      there are some discrepancies. in long-range aviation, time is differently evaluated
      when you fly at a time of 8-11 hours, it does not equal 11 sorties on a fighter.
    23. 0
      22 October 2019 12: 57
      Quote: Samum
      Yes, sell at least 20 to Pakistan at a normal price and the Indians themselves will crawl on their knees !!!)))) Although they are our old friends!)

      give the link to pakistan to vparit india regiment)))
    24. 0
      22 October 2019 14: 47
      In fact, Indian Defense News stole this article from Military Watch Magazine, which was published on August 10, 2019. The article was titled "Why Russia's Offer to Build its Elite Su-35 Fighters in India Could be Very Tempting for Delhi". So it was explained in the USA about the Su-35, and not in India))))

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"