Mamluks. Addition to the popular series “Knights and Knights of Three Centuries”

54
"Fight in the way of Allah with those who fight against you, but do not transgress the boundaries of what is permitted."
The second surah of the Qur'an "Al-Bakara" (ayn 190)


Warriors of Eurasia. Publishing cycle articles “Knights and chivalry of three centuries” aroused great interest among those site visitors who are interested in the topic of military affairs, armor and weapons past eras. Many expressed wishes to expand its chronological framework, which is understandable. However, no matter how one would like, far from always and not on all topics one can find quite interesting information, and, which is also very important, illustrations. The search for the latter sometimes takes many times longer than writing the material itself. In addition, not all photos of Internet resources can be used. But it also happens that there is a desire of readers to deepen the topic and ... there is everything to fulfill this wish. So, for example, in the previous material about the warriors of North Africa the Egyptian Mamluks were mentioned, but it was said that in the original source, the monograph by D. Nicolas, it was offensively little. But then he “corrected himself” and wrote an excellent study on them. True, within certain limits, it goes beyond the chronological framework of this topic. Well, no one bothers us to take them and expand them enough to describe them in detail, as well as consider weapons, armor and all their other equipment, by the way, very similar to knightly.




Horse games of Mamluk warriors. Fig. Peter Dennis.


The same "armed slaves"


To begin with, who are the Mamluks (as well as the Mamelukes, which in Arabic means “belonging”). This is the military feudal estate of medieval Egypt, originally consisting of young slaves of Turkic and Caucasian origin, among whom were Circassians, Abkhazians, and Georgians. They came to Egypt in a rather interesting way: they were ... abducted in their homeland, where a lot of people hunted it, and then they sold it. It happened that parents who had many children, but the poor, themselves sold "surplus" boys, because they knew that the future of their children in this case would be provided. The boys brought to Egypt were converted to Islam, taught Arabic and military art in closed boarding camps. At the same time, they were taken care of in every way and, compared with the “street children,” they lived in excellent conditions. Trained young soldiers were "released" and their social status changed: the former slave was declared a free Muslim. Then they took the oath of allegiance to their bei or emir and had to fulfill it! And that’s all! Even the children of the Mamelukes did not become Mamelukes, since they had already received home education! And, by the way, that is why new Mamluks needed to be constantly bought and constantly cooked. And that is precisely why they were so devoted to their “father-commanders” that they saw what courage and loyalty turn into.

Mamluks. Addition to the popular series “Knights and Knights of Three Centuries”

The weapons and armor of a Mamluk warrior of the 15th and early 16th centuries:
(1) Emir of middle rank of the end of the XV and the beginning of the XVI centuries, wearing a gilded helmet with a sliding bow arrow, a Kazakh man with a lining of chain mail and a scaly shell. Armed with a saber, dagger and bow with a stock of arrows.
(2а) Brigandine of the XV century from two layers of quilted canvas, a layer of metal plates and a top cover of red velvet.
(2b) Small steel plates that probably protected the shoulders.
(2c) Copper belt buckle on the front of the brigandine.
(3) A typical Yushman dating from the late 15th century. Rawhide straps are passed through the uppermost rows of chainmail weaving that form the collar of this armor to make it semi-rigid. The upper and lower parts of the armor consist of a chain hauber of large flattened rings, and the middle of gilded steel rectangular plates.
(4) Chain and plate armor for the hip and knee.
(5a) A gilded cone helmet with bolts and a movable platypus.
(5b) A bumpshield helmet without trimmings with cheek pieces and a movable platypus.
(5с) Helmet with head and movable spreader.
(5d) Helmet with engraving, cheekbones and movable platypus.
(5e) Fluted spherical helmet with engraved trim around eyebrows.
(6a) Appearance of an engraved steel shield.
(6b) The inside of the steel shield.
(7) Saber.
(8а) A dagger with a covered skin, a wooden handle and a bronze crosshair.
(8b and 8c) Both sides of the scabbard with bronze leather-covered trim.
(9а) A decorated battle ax with a crescent-shaped blade.
(9b) Battle ax with a “bearded” blade and the heraldic emblem of the Mamelukes.
(9c) A battle ax with a small head with gold-plated trim.
(10) Steel lance tip with a simple blade and a decorated sleeve.
(11) Engraved steel tip-shaped standard.
Fig. Peter Dennis


The forerunners of the Mamluks were ghouls in the Arab Caliphate, where the ruling elite very quickly realized how beneficial it was to use people without a clan, without a tribe, and not burdened by any national prejudices and clan interests. As a matter of fact, in ghouls and Mamluks in the first place there was always only one interest: you fight well - you have everything. Even betraying their masters to the same Mamluks was very difficult, because they knew no other life but their own, and it was clear that they did not trust any of the strangers. And what could they offer them? More gold, horses and women? All of this was enough for them, and besides, any act contrary to military honor was a shame for them. So they were brought up, therefore they fought bravely, and were fearless and incorruptible. That is, in fact, they were “knights without fear and reproach”, only Muslim ones. What could attract them and, of course, attracted them was power. After all, dying for the interests of others is not a hunt for anyone.


Turban helmet of the late 15th century. Helmets of this type are commonly called turban helmets because of their bulbous shape and bulges that mimic the folds of a turban. Since some groups of dervishes wore turbans wound with the prescribed number of folds, symbolizing an important mystical number, it is therefore likely that turban helmets were considered not only as armor, but also as a kind of religious insignia, their very form designated the owner as a fighter in the sacred the war. Together with chain mail armor, they were intended for heavy cavalry and were seen back in the 14th century. This helmet, apparently, belonged to the Ak Kuyunlu dynasty, which ruled in northwestern Iran and Anatolia in the 15th century. Inscriptions inlaid with gold and silver glorify local rulers, wish the owner good or give advice on how to achieve virtue. Helmet height 33.34 cm; diameter 24.13 cm; weight 1219 g. (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York)

Therefore, only the Mamluks in Egypt felt like a single estate, how in 1250 they overthrew the Ayyubid dynasty and seized power in the country. One of the rebel emirs - the commanders of large detachments of the Mamluks, Aybek, then proclaimed himself the sultan. The new elite replenished in the same way as before. Apparently this method seemed optimal to the new Mamluk nobility: children were bought in the Golden Horde, and then they were made of them warriors. There are two known “dynasties” of Mamluk sultans who ruled Egypt: Bahrita * (1250 — 1382) and Burjits ** (1382 — 1517).


Turkish helmet with aventile, the end of the XV - the beginning of the XVI century. This particularly attractive and well-preserved Turban helmet is interesting in that it completely retained its chain mail aventail, which protected the lower half of the warrior's face and his neck. It is believed that this helmet was made in Shirvan. Helmet height 34.6 cm; diameter 25.4 cm; weight with a barmini 3350.9 g; without chain mail 1616 g. (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York)

The elite of the medieval eastern army


Even such an example speaks of what kind of soldiers they were: at 1260, it was the Mamluks, led by Sultan Beibars, who defeated the army of the Mongol conquerors under Ain Jalut, and recaptured all of Syria from them, including its capital Damascus.

A year later, all Islamic shrines of Arabia fell under their authority: the cities of Mecca and Medina.

In the 1375 year, the Mamluks defeated the Armenian Cilician kingdom of the Rubenids, and so thoroughly that it no longer rose, and in the 1419 year, the emirate of Karamanids subjugated their power. True, after 100 years, the Turks of Sultan Selim I, using firearms that the Mamluks themselves underestimated, were able to defeat them at Marg Dabik and took control of Egypt. But then they also had the mind not to deprive the Mamelukes of their privileged status, although now they had to obey the Turkish Pasha.


Turkish turban helmet, end of the XV-XVI century. Made in Istanbul in the style of Turkmen armor. Height 36.8 cm; diameter 28.3 cm; weight 1715.1 g. The finish of the helmet is made by burnishing and gilding with silver inlay (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York)



Close-up silver inlay pattern


In the 1798 year, Napoleon in the famous battle of the pyramids, well, the one where he said: "Donkeys and scientists in the middle", managed to defeat the cavalry of the Mamelukes. But he also invited the Mamluks to go to his service. Many of them agreed to this, took the oath of allegiance to him, and ... became his personal bodyguards, whom he unconditionally trusted.


Another turban helmet from the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. It differs from ordinary turban helmets in the absence of convex curls on the surface. Instead, four-pentahedral-bordered surfaces are used to apply Arabic inscriptions to the helmet. Interestingly, the position of the scavenger is fixed with a special hook. The helmet is steel, inlaid with silver. It should be noted that similar helmets were used throughout the Middle East in all Muslim troops.


In 1806, the Mamluks once again rebelled against Turkish rule, but were defeated by the Turkish army. Is over story Mamelukes tragically. In 1811, 1 of March, Egyptian Pasha Muhammad Ali invited the most notable Mameluke bei to his gala dinner and ordered his guard to kill them all. After that, the Mamelukes began to be killed throughout Egypt. It is believed that in all about 600 thousand people were killed, but some of them still managed to escape to Sudan. It is hardly an exaggeration to say that the Mamluks were the elite of the medieval eastern army. In terms of their fighting qualities, they were practically inferior in no way to their Christian opponents from overseas Europe, and in some ways they even surpassed them!


Helmet of the 15th century with vertical grooves-flutes. Height 31,1 cm, diameter 24,1 cm, weight 1161 g.


Использованная литература:
1. Smirnov, V.E., Nedvetsky, A.G. Mamluks - fearless warriors and scouts of Egypt // Living History of the East: Collection. M., 1998. C.249 – 257.
2. Nicolle, D. Mamluk 'Askary' 1250 - 1517. UK. Oxford: Osprey Publishing (Warrior No.173), 2014.
3. Nicolle, D. The Mamluks 1250 – 1517 UK. L .: Osprey Publishing (Men-at-arms No.259), 1993.

* The name of the Bahri dynasty indicates the overseas origin of its rulers, since it is derived from the Arabic word "Bahr" ("sea" or, less commonly, "big river"). That is, we are talking about people from across the sea or from a large river, for example, the Volga.

** Burji comes from the name of the citadel (al-Burj) of Cairo, in which Sultan Kalaun placed his guard.


To be continued ...
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    22 October 2019 06: 20
    Thank you for the article
  2. +6
    22 October 2019 06: 27
    Turban helmets were considered not only as armor, but also as a kind of religious insignia, their very form designated the owner, as a fighter in a holy war.
    as I understand it, the letters on the helmet carry the same function
    1. +3
      22 October 2019 06: 41
      Well, there may be sayings from the Koran, or mottos like "cut the unbelievers." Something like the Mujahideen write on their foreheads, in the sense of green armbands. hi
      1. +8
        22 October 2019 11: 13
        There individual suras (if I translated correctly) were written, in the evening I will try to find their photo and translation from Arabic.
        1. +1
          22 October 2019 12: 53
          Try, colleague, it will be interesting to see.
          1. +4
            22 October 2019 23: 32
            Quote: Sea Cat
            Try, colleague, it will be interesting to see.


            There are a lot of inscriptions on the armor, but with the translation I found only 2 religious texts (I didn’t find any mottos), on the helmet in the photo of Ayat al-Kursi:
            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%8F%D1%82_%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C-%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8
  3. +5
    22 October 2019 06: 33
    Good morning friends! Hello everyone and best wishes. hi

    Thanks for the new article, Vyacheslav Olegovich. But I hardly associate Muslim horsemen with the very concept of "chivalry". That doesn't match, even though you crack. And who are the Mamluks, I, oddly enough, know from early childhood. At one time, "Georgia Film" released a film with the same name: "Mamluk". The film was colorful and very beautiful, it sunk into children's memory. The plot was simple: two little boys from a mountain village in Georgia were kidnapped by some abreks and sold in a slave market somewhere in the East to different buyers. One became a major military leader among the Mamelukes, and the second a lieutenant in the French army. They met during Bonaparte's African campaign. Quite tragic, by the way. That's when it was, but I remember it. smile
    1. +4
      22 October 2019 07: 08
      The two heroes met too late ...
    2. +8
      22 October 2019 08: 11
      I greet you Konstantin! And I first got acquainted with these wars after reading our famous Doyle’s Conan series about Brigadier Gerard, also in childhood. Then I learned that Napoleon had a personal bodyguard to Rostam, a mameluke, who was Armenian by origin from Georgia. And the first time he did not follow the order after Bonaparte’s abdication, he refused to leave the emperor. This is true devotion! Yes, yes! Vyacheslav Olegovich thanks for the article! Respectfully, I.
    3. +5
      22 October 2019 08: 21

      There was such a film in 1989.
    4. +3
      22 October 2019 16: 36
      Napoleon’s personal bodyguard Rustam (present on some canvases with the emperor), an Armenian stolen from Karabakh and became a Mameluke in Egypt, went to the service of Napoleon during an Egyptian company. After the emperor’s exile, he returned to Karabakh and lived there.
    5. 0
      23 October 2019 13: 07
      Of course, can they be compared? laughing - Mamluks surpassed the French knights of Saint Louis both in the quality of knives and armor and in combat training. As a result, the entire army of the crusaders, led by the King of France, Louis the Saints, was captured, having suffered a complete defeat ... it was the Mamluks who gave the Knights Templars, Hospitallers and Teutonic Knights a good kick, driving them from the Middle East. The whole West could not oppose anything worthwhile valor Mamluks Ayyubidov.
      1. +1
        23 October 2019 13: 58
        The West could not oppose anything? However... request
  4. +4
    22 October 2019 07: 03
    Good morning, Constantine! I also really liked this movie. And chivalry ... for the French - cheval - chevalier - flax, in the East - far - furusiyya - ikta. Even the dedication is similar: for the Franks, a blow on the shoulder with a sword and tying a belt and spurs, and in the east, where they also had their knightly orders - putting on special trousers and drinking a bowl of salt water. Even the coats of arms were washed, only in the East - round. In my book "The Crusaders" all this is described in detail.
    1. +5
      22 October 2019 07: 34
      And knighthood ... among the French - Cheval - Chevalier - linen, in the East - Faroe - Furusiyya - ikta.
      Chevalier (Fr.), He is a gentleman (Eng.), He is a Ritter (German) - a horseman. In this context, a heavily armed horseman whose main combat tactic is a hard contact collision with cold steel. First and foremost, a lance collapse. Everything else - flax, status, stems from the cost of equipment and training of such a fighter.
      While a single state (Ancient Rome) was able to equip, maintain and train such units at public expense, there were no flaxes and superhigh status (compared to other groups of citizens) - clianbaria / cataphracts. As soon as the single economy collapsed, all this turned into feudalism - the rider’s self-sufficiency through land grants. And there immediately, and the status soared.
      1. +5
        22 October 2019 09: 30
        The scheme is similar, but in details it’s not quite like that)))
        Without the emergence of the early German states on the territory of Western Europe, feudalism would hardly have appeared, as it had hardly arisen in Byzantium or the Roman Empire.
        And then it arose only after the settlement of the violent people-troops in the new lands, when the majority began to be weighed down by military service, extracting funds for living from the earth.
        But the East is generally a delicate matter)))
        However, Vyacheslavov Olegovich and I already exchanged opinions on this matter: he is more and more about arming the rider, in its pure form, in the west or in the east.
        1. +3
          22 October 2019 09: 40
          it arose only after the settlement of the violent people-troops in the new lands
          We must clearly imagine, despite the fact that in the Germanic tribes all the men were military men, real professionals, like other nations, made up a negligible minority as a percentage of the population. And if this military stratum could not and did not want to do anything other than war, the rest of the tribesmen were not very eager for battle. And at the first opportunity settled down to engage in ordinary peaceful activities.
          when the majority began to be weighed down by military service, extracting livelihoods from the earth.
          Not certainly in that way. Just the amount of military booty is not infinite. And she eats up one or two. Someone should reproduce material wealth. And this process is already very slow. Especially at that level of economic development.
          Therefore, the aforementioned majority can and would like to live from generation to generation with military booty. Yes it could not.
          But the East is generally a delicate matter)))
          Sure, there were differences. But not so large that it was impossible to distinguish the era of feudalism in Muslim countries or the Far East and Southeast Asia.
          he is more and more about the armament of the rider
          So I am about the same.
        2. 0
          28 October 2019 00: 27
          Feudalism is a castle. In the castles, the population was hiding during
          enemy raids, and in gratitude for this paid the feudal lord.
          Who were these enemies? Vikings, traders slave trade.
          The peasants did not want to fall into slavery - they sold them to Muslim
          country. They preferred their feudal lord.
          Simplified, of course, but approximately so.
          The Vikings themselves, settling in Europe, also necessarily built castles, turning
          from alien robbers to "native" peaceful feudal lords.
      2. +5
        22 October 2019 12: 47
        Quote: abrakadabre
        Everything else - flax, status, stems from the cost of equipment and training of such a fighter.

        Are you sure you did not harness the horse behind the cart? smile
        First - the property state of a person, from which his equipment stems and, in relation to the existing equipment, the corresponding combat skills are developed. The status of an equestrian warrior at all times was quite high (riders in ancient Rome, for example), and was determined by nothing more than the subject's property status, and in no way his skills and abilities. In Russia, there was even such a saying - "for the right and service." Even in Rome, only legionnaires, that is to say, heavy infantry, the city's militia, were equipped at state expense. The cavalrymen bought horses and weapons themselves, which few could afford. As a result, the sad situation in Rome with cavalry and the need to hire mounted soldiers outside the empire.
        A separate category of military personnel were personal squads of nobles and (or) rulers. The number of soldiers in them and their equipment depended on the personal condition of their commander and these soldiers served for salaries, not being knights in the original sense of the word, despite the similarity of weapons and, as a consequence, the methods of warfare.
        A knight is primarily a landowner. Without the coat of arms and the land allotment, no one would listen.
        Therefore, now some scholars (for example, A.A. Gorsky) are trying to revise the very concept of "feudalism" in the direction of its expansion, since in its classical, narrow understanding, this concept fits exclusively the Kingdom of France, according to which this term was actually calibrated. In Russia, for example, classical feudalism with a developed system of vassalage (king - duke - count - baron - knight) did not work out, and soldiers began to receive land allotments for service in large quantities only under Ivan III. This, by the way, immediately affected both the number of soldiers (it increased sharply) and the quality of their equipment (it fell, since servicemen simply could not collect money for high-quality weapons from their estates).
    2. +4
      22 October 2019 07: 37
      Somehow putting on "special trousers" reminded me of the difference in the color of the audience in the pants from "Kin-za-za". smile
      1. +5
        22 October 2019 08: 19
        Ha! And also the phrase of the Doctor from * Gangster Petersburg *: * On, now you have a pipe! * laughing hi
        1. +2
          22 October 2019 13: 01
          Hello, Sergey. hi I can’t evaluate - I didn’t look. request
      2. +6
        22 October 2019 13: 13
        No, genatsvale. When society has no color differentiation of pants, then there is no purpose! (from)belay
        1. +5
          22 October 2019 14: 43
          No, genatsvale. When society has no color differentiation of pants, then there is no purpose!

          Mr. Uef (in a penetrating voice, letting out a tear): "and you, Violinist, before thinking that you are the first Georgian cosmonaut, and you will be given the Nobel Prize .. return the spoon that you stole from the poor artists .." crying
          Colleagues, the question is: can samurai be conditionally ranked as an analogue of chivalry, or not? drinks
          1. +3
            22 October 2019 16: 12
            Hello, dear Nicholas! A counter-question, but Cossacks? Have they also * self-designated * selfishness *? lol But samurai? And then how is it that armor is available, a code of conduct is available.
            1. +4
              22 October 2019 16: 19
              A counter-question, what about the Cossacks? Have they also * self-designated * selfishness * lacquerism?

              hmm .. the question is very delicate .. what Sergei, I'm not ready to discuss the Cossacks, I can only say that I read Taras Bulba four years ago. As a teenager, it was one of my favorite books. Yes Romance, Cossack heroes and all that. fellow And then he began to re-read in adulthood about how Bulba, upon arrival in Sich, first proposed to go at least for someone by a campaign, and then he achieved a change of a cat’s one - yes, there’s just some hooliganism! request laughing Well, Gogol writes that the times were severe soldier drinks
              I still think that the samurai also belonged to the analogue of chivalry. "Servant nobles", if I may say so. hi
          2. +1
            23 October 2019 04: 12
            Where to him, poor fellow, against the enlightened Javropa. laughing
  5. +3
    22 October 2019 07: 39
    Quote: abrakadabre
    And there immediately, and the status soared.

    That's right, you can’t say better!
  6. +3
    22 October 2019 09: 33
    Vyacheslav Olegovich,
    Thanks for Mamlukov!
    By the way, the question, as a child in "TM" I read an article, it struck me, an article dedicated to the knights: where did the name come from, etc., that the French have chevaliers, and not knights, do you remember?
    1. +2
      22 October 2019 10: 09
      Well, then, I remember this article and its author. And then the article by M. Gorelik in AROUND THE WORLD for the 1975 year - it was a revelation!
    2. +4
      22 October 2019 15: 25
      Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
      the French chevalier

      Chevalier San Pere E San Repro smile
      1. +6
        22 October 2019 16: 01
        Chevalier San Pere E San Repro

        Michael, that he (the Chevalier) is there "lane itself"? not understood.. belay Did Chevalier do that? it seemed to me to rub something, they Sanchi Pansa usually had drinks laughing
        1. +5
          22 October 2019 17: 40
          Quote: Pane Kohanku
          they usually had sanchi panza

          Even the most illustrious were never shy. There was even such a Duke of Burgundy, a little, a lot of the grandson of King Jean the Good (the same one that the British captured at Poitiers), so everyone called him Jean Sanpeur. There is an opinion that he "stole" something in the battle with the Turks near Nikopol, after which they started to call him that, but there is also an opinion that he was not a "sanper", but a real "lyash", in other words, a coward, and "sanitary" him as a trolling.
          In Russian would be Ivan Filippovich Fearless - does it sound? - and in French please - Jean Sanper. And who said that French is harmonious? smile
          1. +3
            22 October 2019 18: 35
            Of course euphonious, in comparison with German! Try to tell the woman: "Their libe doo"!
            1. +5
              22 October 2019 19: 07
              "Their libe doo"!

              Better this way: "Look, sweep, diish, glitch, makhn!" wink
              1. +3
                22 October 2019 20: 00
                Damn, Nikolai! You are a victim of teaching and the predominance of "pijn-inglish" in their Russian schools! Well, the combination of letters "ch" is not read in German, like one of the sibilant consonants in Russian
                1. +3
                  23 October 2019 09: 17
                  Well, the combination of letters "ch" is not read in German, like one of the hissing consonants in Russian

                  it's all clear, but Ramstein also sings "Du hast mish"And not "du hast miH". As explained to me, now all of Germany is saying, and the correct endings -h, -dih - they say "high Berlin calm". request moreover, the person who had lived in the nemectina for several years explained! drinks
                  1. +2
                    23 October 2019 19: 04
                    Quote: Pane Kohanku
                    "high Berlin calm".

                    I join you Nikolai! We are in the army, in training, when they put the German language, they demanded exactly what, in the endings. Sorry, Good evening to you!
            2. +2
              23 October 2019 10: 43
              It will be impolite. "Their libe Zi" should be polite if. :)
          2. +3
            23 October 2019 11: 08
            And who said that French is harmonious?

            yeah, and the phrase "love is lost" in French it will sound "l'amour est perdu" wink beautiful! good drinks

            my old house, lanfren-lanfra ... something there, here and there ... "Chevalier, you also eat frogs in France! " laughing
      2. +6
        22 October 2019 18: 04
        Chevalier is always honored
        "San lane e san reporter",
        What if translated
        The bottom line: women, booze and brawl. laughing
        1. +6
          22 October 2019 18: 24
          * chevalier sans peur et sans reproche. Knight without fear and reproach.)
          1. +5
            22 October 2019 18: 43
            Anton's translation is more interesting laughing
            1. +5
              22 October 2019 19: 08
              Anton's translation is more interesting

              Anton himself is very original! wink is the phrase "pirates with mulattos" still valid? drinks
              1. +1
                23 October 2019 04: 14
                Well, of course it is valid, like the Tank, in general. drinks
            2. +5
              22 October 2019 19: 10
              "And what about us, curly-haired! Songs ?!"
  7. +3
    22 October 2019 09: 35
    "... in 1260, it was the Mamluks, led by Sultan Beibars, who defeated the army of Mongol conquerors at Ain Jalut ..."
    The sultan was Kutuz, and not Baybars, as I recall.
    1. +5
      22 October 2019 13: 16
      At the battle of Ain Jalut, Baybars commanded the reserve troops of the Sultan of Kutuz.
  8. +4
    22 October 2019 13: 34
    The forerunners of the Mamluks were ghouls in the Arab caliphate
    I would still clarify somewhat - in the Abassid caliphate, which included the territories of the modern Arab countries of Asia, part of Central Asia, Egypt, Iran, North Africa and India.
    The latter interests us for the reason that there were three dynasties of Mamluk sultans, two in Egypt and one in India - the Ghaznavids. In 962, Alp-Tegin, relying on faithful Gulam guards, proclaimed himself an independent ruler of the city of Ghazni. The state of the Ghaznavids occupied the territories of Khorasan, Afghanistan, Khorezm, Bukhara, Kurgan, the northern provinces of India, and Iraq.
    In 1249, Aybak will do exactly the same, relying on loyal Mamluk guards, having seized power over Egypt and ruled as al-Malik al-Muiz from 1250 to 1257, in the Mameluk state he founded.
  9. +3
    23 October 2019 10: 44
    The level is amazing ...
    As the ORIGINAL source, the monograph of a person is named.
    As they say yes ...
    1. +3
      23 October 2019 14: 31
      The level of the article is certainly below the plinth.
      Pictures with comments (I’m silent about them for now).
      But what a cult of personality of the author in VO is funny and sad)
  10. +3
    23 October 2019 17: 32
    Quote: Hunghouse
    The level is amazing ...
    As the ORIGINAL source, the monograph of a person is named.
    As they say yes ...

    For you, more than enough.
  11. +3
    23 October 2019 17: 40
    Quote: Dalton
    I’m silent about them

    And why? Express your competent opinion. It is always interesting to get a comment from a specialist.
  12. 0
    16 December 2022 10: 22
    I wonder why the Mamluks spoke Tatar? I read about this in Belinka in a shabby little book by some Arab historian. I don't remember how long ago it was, it was more than 40 years old.
    And here's something else strange - I remember my youth well, but now at lunchtime I sometimes don't remember what I had for breakfast ...