Missiles or museum exhibits? How will Russian fighters fight against the West

84
Russian media often talk about re-equipping the Air Force, with particular emphasis on deliveries of new aviation technicians. There is some truth in this: supplied the troops of the Su-35С, Su-30СМ and Su-34 are indeed machines of a new construction, although all of them are purely structurally modernized Su-27. Moreover, even far from modern aviation, it is clear that any modern combat aircraft is a complex. In every sense of the word. And without modern weapons there is absolutely nothing for the fighter to do in the sky, apart from reconnaissance missions. Most of all, we are interested in medium-range air-to-air missiles - the main weapon of a modern fighter in aerial combat. How can the videoconferencing respond to a potential adversary?





P-27P / ER


Numerous photo and video materials allow us to say with a high degree of certainty that even now the main air-to-air missile in the Aerospace Forces is the P-27.

“R-27 are the main missiles of Russian aviation, at one time a large number of them were produced,” military expert Anton Lavrov told Izvestia in the 2019 year. We see no reason to doubt his words: we are observing this missile on separate sides flying in Syria, and it also appears on images taken during exercises in the Russian Federation itself.

Much more interesting details. In open sources you can find information about a wide variety of modifications, including the P-27P with the passive radar homing 9Б1032 and the semi-mythical P-27AE with the active radar homing, that is, the conditional analogue of AIM-120 AMRAAM. However, it is rather from the category of fiction.

The main modification of the rocket is the P-27P / ER with a semi-active radar homing head. At the time of adoption in the 1987 year, it was fully consistent with the requirements of the time, although it did not constitute anything revolutionary. However, now it can no longer be considered modern. A semi-active radar seeker catches the tracking radar signal reflected from the target. Thus, the pilot must “lead” the target until the moment of its defeat, having relatively modest angles of permissible maneuvering. At the same time, modern missiles, such as AMRAAM, have active radar homing, which allows the product to independently aim at the target at the end of the route, without restricting the pilot in maneuver.

This year it became known about the modernization of the R-27. “Now the R-27 is capable of hitting complex targets, including cruise missiles, Drones and fifth-generation aircraft," Izvestia wrote. These general phrases do not give an idea of ​​the real potential of the upgraded missile. However, from the outside, the modernization of the R-27 looks like a necessary measure in the face of a lack of funds, technologies and experience in using modern missiles.

Moreover, the experience of using the P-27 missile during the Ethiopian-Eritrean conflict showed the relatively low efficiency of such missiles. On the Web, you can find data with reference to Chinese experts: allegedly from 100 missiles fired, about five hit the target. This is not surprising: during the Vietnam War, American AIM-7 Sparrow showed a similar result, but not so with AIM-120, which have long been proven to be effective.

P-27T / ET


As you can see in the shots from the Syrian air base Khmeimim, the Russian Air Force fighter planes Su-35С flew with R-27Т missiles. This is a version of the P-27 with an infrared homing head and the principle of "shot-forgot", in general, the same as that implemented on short-range air-to-air missiles.



Inherited P-27T and the shortcomings of its "younger" brothers. In open sources, the launch range of the P-27T is mentioned in the 50 km region, while for the “energy” P-27ET this figure is already 70. However, in real conditions, such an indicator can only be achieved by launching a rocket into the rear hemisphere: when launching into the front hemisphere for a small target, the range will probably not exceed the launch range of short-range infrared seekers like P-73 and AIM-9.

The launch range into the front hemisphere for later versions of AIM-9 is approximately 20 kilometers: most likely, the P-27ET has similar indicators. Given the growth in the effectiveness of medium-range missiles and the withdrawal of short-range missiles, the meaning of the "hybrid" in the person of the P-27T / ET is incomprehensible. In fact, this is an old rocket, which it is high time to take a place in the aviation museum: it is large, heavy, with a low launch range and limited maneuverability. Now it has no advantages either over modern short-range missiles or over medium-range products.

P-77 (RVV-AE)


A domestic medium-range missile (more than 100 kilometers) with an active radar homing head was officially adopted in the 1994 year, however, this step had nothing to do with reality. The product, if seen, then at international exhibitions and in the framework of contracts concluded with partners of the Russian Federation.



Positive changes in this sense partially coincided with the appearance of modernized Su-27 (Su-27СМ, Su-30СМ, Su-30МК2, Su-35С, Su-34) and MiG-29СМТ capable (at least in theory) apply such products. One of the first more or less reliable proofs of the presence of P-77 missiles in the arsenal of the Russian Aerospace Forces was shots shown in the 2016 year: then experts noticed Su-35С fighters with P-77 missiles (aircraft side numbers: 03, 04, 05, 06 )



And in 2015, it became known about the purchase with the number 0173100004515001647, information about which can be found on the Main procurement portal. This is a tender for the supply of an 170-1 product, also known as RVV-SD. This is a further development of the RVV-AE rocket. The RVV-SD variant was introduced ten years ago: the missile has a range of up to 110 km.

There is also information on the development of the “Product 180” (K-77M) and “Product 180-BD” missiles, partially optimized for use by Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57.

P-77 prospects for the Russian Air Force are unknown, especially given the financial difficulties in the country and information about the modernization of the old Soviet P-27 (despite the fact that the Americans sent their Sparrows a long time ago).

What are the reasons that the new missile did not supplant old products in the Arsenal of the aerospace forces? Perhaps there are technical problems with the P-77 family. Recall that in 2019, the Indian television company NDTV stated that the claimed launch range of the P-77 in 80 kilometers could not be confirmed in a real air battle with the Pakistanis, while the latter attacked Indian aircraft with AIM-120 missiles at a distance of about 100 kilometers.



However, this kind of information should also be treated with caution. Firstly, when launching a medium-range air-to-air missile from a distance of 100 kilometers on a fighter target, the chance to get by default is modest. Especially if the target will maneuver. Secondly, Indians like to criticize their partners supplying them with weapons. Both Russian and, for example, the French. But India did not have and does not have its own military-industrial complex, which would meet the requirements of the 21st century.

As for Russia, the difficulties with medium-range missiles are obvious. At the same time, it is important to understand that without the full re-equipment of the aerospace forces from old Soviet products to modern missiles with an active homing radar, the supply of new equipment has a rather limited meaning. In fact, this is only the support of the Air Force at the level of past decades.

Perhaps in future materials we will analyze Russian (and not only) short-range and long-range air-to-air missiles. Moreover, there are no less myths around than around RVV-AE.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -28
    17 October 2019 05: 30
    "In fact, this is an old rocket, which is long overdue to take a place in the aviation museum: it is large, heavy, with a low launch range and limited maneuverability." Well, well, everything is old, morally outdated, in short, once again .. . the chief usё disappeared. What can we do, we rake the legacy of Perestroika and world integration. Here, as always, there is a dilemma: a lot and cheap or a little, but expensive. And as a result of the latest events India-Pakistan, there was no strong difference, the pilots determined everything.
    1. +44
      17 October 2019 05: 50
      When will you stop restructuring everything? Thirty years have passed. The Soviet Union managed to live half of its life during this time. Now we are not raking the consequences of perestroika, but the consequences of creating a mafia-oligarchic state and the unwillingness of this state to fight corruption. In the India-Pakistan conflict, it is generally impossible to say whether there was a difference or not, and who determined what - because not only about the events, but even about the loss of accurate information, there was and is not.
      1. -11
        17 October 2019 06: 12
        "When will you stop writing off everything for perestroika?", So its ideology, live for yourself at the expense of the state, has not gone anywhere over these decades, "the consequences of the creation of a mafia-oligarchic state and the unwillingness of this state to fight corruption" is its legacy.
        1. +9
          17 October 2019 08: 42
          In that case, why say "we rake", no one was going to do this. Those who came to power during perestroika dug in there, so that nothing can be taken out of there.
          1. -10
            17 October 2019 08: 52
            And so I want to take these away and give them away, right?
            1. +11
              17 October 2019 08: 57
              And apparently you are satisfied with these? I am not.
              1. +5
                17 October 2019 11: 05
                if you created your company with honest money, then you don’t have to take anything away from you, but the person meant people sitting on national estates and not even honestly received
      2. -2
        17 October 2019 15: 27
        Author! And where is the data about our new RVV-BD: R-37M, KS-172 and other developments ... I understand that they do not exist in your understanding. However, the R-37M is in service with Russia. The article simply does not stand up to criticism! Everything is lost?
        1. +4
          18 October 2019 00: 33
          Quiet, did you try to read before writing?
          The author writes: "We are most interested in medium-range air-to-air missiles - the main weapon of a modern fighter in aerial combat."
          And here RVV-BD: R-37M, KS-172?
      3. 0
        20 October 2019 10: 50
        And what do you dislike about the state?
        Good peaceful state.
        It is necessary that 60 tanks and serve for 000 years urgent? And so that the turn of the oil for 4 hours?
    2. +10
      17 October 2019 06: 00
      We do not have everything "unparalleled" .... There are problems, they can and should be solved. The main problem is in the economy, the weakness of which does not allow allocating more funds for the development and testing of promising ASPs and purchasing those already developed in the required quantities.
      For short-range B-B missiles, a new small-sized missile is needed that has a multi-spectral matrix guidance head that implements principles including capture the target after launch and the ability to search for re-interception of the target during the initial miss.
      We need a new medium-range missile with the ability to aim at interference, with the ability to target in active, passive (i.e., in addition to radio, and infrared guidance within the same GOS), semi-active modes with in-flight correction received from various sources (aircraft carrier, AWACS, other aircraft), you need to move on to the principle of hitting a target with a direct hit, which will allow you to abandon the high-explosive fragmentation warhead and reduce the mass and size of the rocket.
      It’s clear where to go, but we need financing and competition from manufacturers. As a rule, the Defense Ministry takes from us what the defense industry offers, which, for example, differs greatly from the USA practice, where competitions between developers are held within the framework of established technical tasks, and the winner is AWARDED (as they say) with a contract for industrial production.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. Hog
      +6
      17 October 2019 08: 14
      Yes, no matter what scientists are, and the R-27 from this will not become a modern rocket.
      1. -12
        17 October 2019 09: 57
        And what is bad about this rocket? Look at the F35, the maneuverability of this aircraft is not very, will not dodge the P27. Most importantly, a powerful radar should be on the plane launching this missile. I’ll say in advance about the F35 EPR that it will be guided by a ground-based radar or a drone plane, free hunting remained in 1945. So with a competent approach, this missile oh how relevant.
        1. Hog
          +4
          17 October 2019 10: 01
          Oh well, why then a rocket at all, it’s plastic, a couple of hits from the cannon and that’s all)))
        2. -3
          17 October 2019 12: 07
          Quote: Pivot
          And what is bad about this rocket?

          PARLGSN. Back in the 80s, the Americans conducted a series of exercises to determine the real capabilities of air-to-air missiles. The result turned out to be predictable, but shocking: in practice, it was confirmed that when launched from a distance of more than 10 miles, onboard electronic warfare systems of 4th generation fighters almost in 100% of cases take even the latest versions of Sparrow into milk. In short, it turned out that in aerial combat with an adversary of a comparable technical level, the USAF can only rely on sidewinder.
        3. 0
          9 December 2019 15: 22
          Everything is written there correctly. The bad thing about p-27 is that it’s an old rocket like shit of a mammoth. She does not know how to properly select goals. That p-27 p / Er / et / t - t - means thermal. Now ask yourself when will the AIM-120 start working, and when will this R-27?
    2. +4
      17 October 2019 09: 20
      "And you should not rely on the data of the Chinese forum" club.mil.news.sina.com.cn ", which reports on the terribly low efficiency of the R-27R missiles in the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea, amounting to 4%. It is necessary to take into account not the highest qualifications Somali military pilots, as well as the lower EPR of the MiG-29 fighter, for which these missiles were fired, the lower the EPR, the greater the likelihood of failure of the target “capture.” The avionics of those modifications of MiGs and Sushki were outdated, and when using PARGSN, the noise immunity of the radar is of paramount importance. " Army Bulletin from 5 Sept. 14 g, article "Does the P-27 family meet the criteria of modern warfare in the air?" From the article it follows that yes, it is very much even at that time, especially when compared with the outdated but still in service with the adversaries' missiles. But today, thank God, it is about the 20th year soon. The adversary is already armed with might and main with new missiles, such as Meteor, and we are all continuing on the old, which is by the way the same author (Damantsev) is talking about now.
  3. +8
    17 October 2019 08: 44
    Well, the su35 with p27 and p73 is like a t90 with a gun from t55. It can be said for a long time that there is no money, that there are many 100 mm shells left, that such a gun has no analogues in the world, that although it is old, it is reliable, that new shells were developed for it and the abrams can be pierced easily from a kilometer away .. Well and so on engage in self-deception.

    It's not even that as a fighter without new Su35 missiles it will be weak. And that defenses are in danger. War with NATO will not be all the same.

    But the fact is that this is an indicator of the weakness of our industry, namely, it is not capable of mass production of high-tech products. And this is strange. It doesn’t happen in the world that the same country normally makes missiles for air defense systems, and cannot equip its fighters with a modern air-to-air missile. It is simply incomprehensible to the mind.

    And, most importantly, the basis of the country's air defense is precisely fighters, and not air defense systems for object air defense. If the sky over Syria was covered by the 35th, then there would not have been any stabs in the back from tomato partners, or a shot down il20, or bombing by Americans and Jews, even from the territory of neighboring states or from the Mediterranean Sea. A 35x patrol would take them to escort before they would fly to the spot, as well as cover their bombers.
    1. -15
      17 October 2019 08: 55
      Quote: Potato
      But the fact is that this is an indicator of the weakness of our industry, namely, it is not capable of mass production of high-tech products. And this is strange.

      Another is strange.
      It is strange that people like you shout here on the basis of the writings of the same "everything is gone."
      Nothing more is needed for you, no evidence.
      1. +4
        17 October 2019 10: 18
        The rocket is ancient. Her productivity is low - verified by the war. What other evidence is needed? Or lay down at all costs?
        1. +1
          17 October 2019 13: 18
          Not verified. No reliable statistics on E-war exist in nature. Even the number of Eritrean planes shot down is not really known, especially the number of launches - who and how, in your opinion, recorded them.
          1. 0
            18 October 2019 08: 36
            There are no reliable statistics. But there are observations of our and Sumerian military specialists and technical specialists, as well as their conclusion - the air war, at its high intensity, showed the extreme ineffectiveness of firing rockets at the enemy competently. Losses on both sides are very low with proper and proper use of technology. The effective firing range of dryers at Khokhlyatsky moments is much less than declared for missiles p27 and even for p73. In order to at least bring down something, it was necessary for the enemy to make a mistake and the distance was ridiculous for modern missiles.
            1. 0
              18 October 2019 10: 40
              So this will apply to all medium-range explosive missiles, unless one of the opponents has enormous numerical or technological superiority
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +1
                  18 October 2019 22: 33
                  Will be . For most of the trajectory, the missiles will be controlled identically, i.e. by inertia + RK, and restrictions on carrier overload will also be the same. and at the end - yes, PARL will be limited, but with a long range - not so significant. Another thing is if the capture were supposed immediately after launch, as in the R-23 or R-40. So there is nothing to blame on the semi-active control system. By the way, for staff members the picture is about the same Dmax much less than stated and usually for goals or not at all, or malfunctioning or with a numerical advantage.
                  1. 0
                    19 October 2019 10: 34
                    Only now, in the first 120s, the capture of the GPS was stably taking place no less than 15 km from the target. If the effective firing range is about 30 km, then this is half the range! And spin after starting as you want. That is the whole point.

                    R27et is a normal rocket if the GOS is replaced by a multi-channel and more sensitive-noise-immune. In good clear weather, she is deadly due to surprise, power supply and power. Only here are places where there is almost no cloud or haze for many miles around.
    2. -6
      23 October 2019 21: 09
      Ah Potato, and such oddities in our industry a dime a dozen (((
  4. +3
    17 October 2019 08: 48
    The article gives an incorrect fact and makes one dubious assumption.
    First, the Russian Federation has had a budget surplus for a long time. Those. money from the state of the Russian Federation at least eat booty. Overwhelmed with dough. It's another matter that the "liberal financial and economic bloc" (tm) of the Russian government categorically does not want to spend money on the defense industry. Another thing is that the government is going to strip the next skins from the population ... But this has nothing to do with the fact that the Russian Federation has huge amounts of money.
    Secondly, it is completely incomprehensible on what basis the author claims that there are not enough missiles in the Russian Aerospace Forces with ARLGSN and that supposedly the main missiles with PRLGSN remain the main ones. Does he have access to arsenal / warehouse data? I doubt it. Is there a tolerance to the figures of the final purchases? I doubt it.
    Well, you understand ...
    But the whole pathos of the article on these two is built.
    1. Hog
      0
      17 October 2019 10: 11
      The conclusion is that no matter where our planes are lit, in 95% of cases they will be with the R-27. If the R-77 was mass then it would be on suspensions, with the same interceptions of NATO aircraft or in Syria, and this (R-77 under the wing) is a rather rare occurrence.
      1. +4
        17 October 2019 11: 35
        I thought so. And so I, right now, asked in Google search for "su35s" and went to look at the pictures. And, here are the times! All the photos of the Su-35s that came across to me with missiles in-in is from the R-77 (K-77)! hi Am I doing something wrong? belay
        Or does the author have the opportunity to collect pictures of various air regiments of the Russian Air Force during their combat training? bully
        1. +3
          17 October 2019 12: 14
          Quote: Private-K
          All the photos of Su-35s I got with missiles in-in precisely with the R-77 (K-77)!

          March 2019, Shoigu arrives in Syria, accompanied by the Su-35S:

          It is difficult to confuse the "Maltese cross" R-27 with something.
          1. +1
            17 October 2019 12: 44
            Su-35S SR-77


            Mig-29/35 with R-77

            Su-30SM with R-77

            Well, we’ll continue to throw pictures or we will conclude that based on the photo for far-reaching conclusions about the presence of certain missiles in service not worth it?
            1. +3
              17 October 2019 15: 22
              Quote: Private-K
              Well, will we continue to throw pictures, or conclude that it is not worthwhile to rely on a photo for far-reaching conclusions about the presence of certain missiles in service?

              So you need to look not at advertising photos from the Moscow Region, but at photos from areas of military use. So far, in most photographs from the same Syria, Su-shki carry the R-27.
              1. 0
                17 October 2019 16: 56
                Russia with whom is the war? Who threatens her over Syria? Israel? Turkey? Decks USA? belay
                In such areas DO NOT include air battles - For there is no one. Only a rare interception (just in case) and missile defense (against the Kyrgyz Republic) defense. For this, R-27 missiles are enough.
                Are you sure anyone other than
                1. 0
                  17 October 2019 17: 37
                  Quote: Private-K
                  Russia with whom is the war? Who threatens her over Syria? Israel? Turkey? Decks USA?

                  Threaten just all of the above. It’s just that for the time being, the conflict is in the stage of the Cold War (more precisely, proxy war), when all parties for the most part are fighting through their puppets or attacking other people's puppets.
                  However, there were precedents when the owners of proxy fighters directly intervened in the conflict, including against our armed forces. And the presence on our airplanes for the most part of the R-27 can just provoke one of the parties precisely to forcefully resolve the issue at any of the points of intersection of interests - for example, to shoot down our attack aircraft, which threatens their proxy troops. All the same, the Russians will not even be able to adequately respond technically, so you can try.
                  Quote: Private-K
                  In such areas DO NOT include air battles - For there is no one.

                  Yeah ... MO also thought so at first. And then we had to abruptly transfer the Su-35S - because our attack aircraft trampled on Turkish blisters, with a predictable result.
              2. +2
                17 October 2019 18: 29
                In Syria, ancient bomber bombers throw, but this does not mean that they are the basis of weapons.
            2. Hog
              +1
              17 October 2019 17: 11
              4 out of 4 advertising photos of MO (the first is possible from MAKS or a similar exhibition) is not an indicator of the word at all.
              Look at the vidos where our dryers are shot while intercepting NATO aircraft and what kind of missiles they have under their wings or from the same Syria.
              PS: How would you not like but the R-77 is not the main RVV SD and will not be fast (if it becomes at all).
              1. -3
                17 October 2019 18: 01
                It will not go anywhere. It just takes a while, i.e. Now it’s not a war and nobody will work around the clock
              2. -1
                18 October 2019 10: 43
                I don’t understand something, you go so that in a couple of years the R-77 riveted as much as the R-27 in 15-20? By the way, is your minus?
                1. Hog
                  0
                  18 October 2019 13: 49
                  1) In one koment there was not enough space?
                  2) If you want, I can deliver.
                  3) If you are not in the know, then the R-77 was put into service in 1994, for 25 years (well, a little more than a couple of years).
                  1. -1
                    18 October 2019 14: 51
                    Actually, I'm talking about production, not formal acceptance
                    1. Hog
                      +1
                      18 October 2019 16: 38
                      The Dux plant has been producing them since 1993.
            3. 0
              18 October 2019 16: 21
              Ahahahaaaa. One photo from the magazine military parade for 1994))))
          2. 0
            17 October 2019 15: 35
            Look at this photo in normal resolution, two missiles are superimposed on each other, the near 27T, and the far one is not at all 27 ...
            1. Hog
              0
              17 October 2019 17: 06
              Well, yes, if the plane of the Minister of Defense was still covered by the 35th, only with the R-27, it would be generally funny.
              1. +2
                17 October 2019 17: 51
                It would be generally funny.

                It's funny that the plane of the Minister of Defense is being "covered". This is a guard of honor, not a cover. laughing The sense of cover is zero, and the bird is small.
    2. 0
      17 October 2019 16: 47
      liberal financial and economic block, the Russian government categorically does not want to spend money on the defense industry


      You perfectly understand that the systemic liberals do not decide anything, the ruling elite itself is preparing for a crisis, collecting a "money-box".
      Therefore, defense spending is reduced, education and medicine are growing by about 1%, no additional funds have been pledged for retirement.
      The tax burden as a whole will increase.
      The draft budget 2020-22 is in the public domain, you can take a look.
  5. +6
    17 October 2019 09: 24
    Despite my malignancy, as a result of which I try, if there is a reason, to criticize the authors; in this case, the opinion of the Author about the R-27 coincides with mine ... Maybe the R-27 was really a good weapon at one time, but that time has passed ... And anyway ... RVV with a semi-active radar seeker never , in my opinion, were not in the "trend"! Although . there are cases when the R-27R "fits" well into the situation: B-52, S-130, KR, U-2 reconnaissance aircraft, reconnaissance drone, stratospheric balloon ... But for maneuverable air combat, so more with the participation of a "decent" number of aircraft, the R-27R rocket, in my opinion, is "vobche" is not suitable ... Therefore, the decision of the party and government to modernize the R-27 was quite surprising! also costs money ... if there is "a lot" of money, then it is still worth spending it on production, for example, the R-77; and not on modernization ... Let the Air Force get a small number of P-77s at the beginning, but they will be (!) than there are almost none of them now!
    1. +2
      17 October 2019 11: 29
      I ask you to pay attention to the fact that I did not compare the types of missiles, but expressed doubts about the knowledge of the author regarding the presence of certain missiles in the arsenals of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

      As for the R-27 (and its clones), I ask you to pay attention to the massive purchases of such missiles by some reputable states, including India. Those. - this horse can still show itself - they think so.
      And you rightly noted: the fight against CD (very important! And resource-intensive) may well be carried out by fundamentally cheaper missile launchers with PRL GOS or R-27 with IR GOS. Again, the computer centers that you indicated that do not require an UR with ARLGSN are very numerous, and why spend many times more expensive UR ​​with ARLGSN on them if you can reliably "shoot" a cheap UR with a PRLGSN or with an IR GOS ???
      In addition, the production of R-27 has long been mastered, the rocket is cheap (relatively) - let it be. Well, due to the modernization of the GOS, engine, fuel change - you can get a significant improvement in performance.
    2. 0
      17 October 2019 18: 03
      So, there have already been contracts, one, if sclerosis does not change - by 200 pieces
  6. -12
    17 October 2019 09: 33
    Missiles or museum exhibits? How will Russian fighters fight against the West

    As soon as the doctrine changes to offensive, we will change the missiles. In the meantime, we, with a defensive doctrine, and fly under the "home umbrella" from the S-300 / S-400.
    In addition, if before the planes performed a missile defense, making it difficult for a missile to defeat. Now, Stealth NATO aircraft fly like irons, and are not adapted to maneuver, which greatly facilitates their defeat for our old missiles.
    1. +1
      17 October 2019 20: 21
      Quote: lucul
      defensive doctrine, and fly under the "home umbrella" of the S-300 / S-400.

      this umbrella has not shown itself anywhere, except for the staging of exercises in exercises.
      Quote: lucul
      Now, Stealth NATO aircraft fly like irons, and are not adapted to maneuver, which greatly facilitates their defeat for our old missiles.

      these "irons" withstand 9G and fly with rockets in their inner compartments. Are you seriously so brainwashed uryashki that you think they fly like a passenger Boeing ???
      1. -8
        17 October 2019 20: 27
        these "irons" withstand 9G and fly with rockets in their inner compartments. Are you seriously so brainwashed uryashki that you think they fly like a passenger Boeing ???

        Aha-ahah these God-chosen me are so touched by their predictability)))
        1. -2
          18 October 2019 00: 27
          How are you and your "Russian weapons are the best in the world"
          1. -5
            18 October 2019 00: 31
            How are you with your

            Yes Yes Yes
            Red Army ( Tsakhal ) all the stronger - we know this propaganda since the 30s ...
      2. 0
        18 October 2019 10: 51
        Did you organize these exercises yourself to write that they are staged? Or simply by the principle - I don’t know for sure, but I want to think so? So far, the S-300/400, even without real launches, still has an effect. And instead of insults, it would be better to bring a diagram of maximum overloads depending on mass, speed and altitude. Togla can be compared with other aircraft. So far, they write that maneuverability, rate of climb and accelerating are quite average - at the level of the late Vipers
        Just in case, I’ll clarify - this is an answer to the post of Adon Arturov
  7. +3
    17 October 2019 10: 08
    And who is this Anton Lavrov?
    https://public.wikireading.ru/89827
    https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2F%2Fbmpd.livejournal.com%2F3249183.html
    And this is the maximum of some useful information that I found about this person. Maybe someone will educate what makes him such a fucking expert who can identify all LTH from a photo?
  8. +1
    17 October 2019 10: 21
    Quote: Mestny
    And so I want to take these away and give them away, right?

    Bravo and thanks. While there are such comments, I at least believe in something else.
  9. +3
    17 October 2019 10: 55
    The arctic fox has already knocked on the doors of opponents of the Russian Aerospace Forces - at the Army-2019 forum, the Russian Ministry of Defense signed a contract with the Agat Research Institute for serial production of AGRLS with AFAR to equip a wide range of domestic air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles


    Features 9B-1103M2:
    radio range - centimeter or millimeter, diameter - 100 mm, length - 230 mm, weight - 3,5 kg, range of detection of air targets (EPR) - 12 km (5 sq.m), 5 km (0,1 sq.m) and 2 km ( 0,03 sq.m).
    1. +2
      17 October 2019 11: 38
      A very good message! Such a GOS is "arch-needed"! Moreover, the given characteristics are quite good ...
      1. +4
        17 October 2019 11: 42
        As I understand it, a whole series of similar ARGSNs for each model of aircraft missiles differing in case diameter will go into the series.
        1. +1
          17 October 2019 12: 05
          "The presence of such a" small-caliber "seeker will make it possible to create" small-caliber ", rather, light missiles with good data on range and altitude (if we mean missiles ...). Of course, it will be useful for both RVV and RVP ... Do not forget about ATGMs ... self-propelled, helicopter.
          1. +4
            17 October 2019 12: 32
            Secondly, ARGSN type 9B-1103M2 are designed to equip anti-aircraft missiles, including for intercepting over-the-horizon air targets with external target designation from ZGRLS "Container" and "Sunflower".
  10. +5
    17 October 2019 12: 05
    The logic is beautiful. "There are old missiles, they are backward. But they seem to be buying new ones, their performance characteristics are unknown. But there is no difficulty or money in the economy. Therefore, we can conclude that they are also backward."

    I remember there was a "military observer Pasha Felgenhauer". He worked for Western grants, for these grants telling us what a backward army we have. And so he misled his own sponsors that the events in Ukraine and Syria were a complete surprise. I am sure that Pasha, by secret decree, received the Order of the Battle Red Banner "for his successes in misinforming a potential enemy."

    So - go on!
    1. 0
      17 October 2019 13: 21
      I remember there was a "military observer Pasha Felgenhauer".
      Well, now he's gone? I even started to worry recourse
  11. +2
    17 October 2019 12: 14
    Author, so where do you get these dense formulations?
    how will Russian fighters fight against the west?

    Why mix countries into a heap, declaring the enemy countries that have never thought of fighting at all? Do you plan to fight with Serbia? or with cuba? or with Finland?
    Maybe you plan to defeat the Air Force of Malta or Andorra?
    These are the stupid rash stuffing and set against our country.
    Personally, I do not consider the whole west to be potential enemies. It’s necessary not to throw foam at everyone’s mouth, but to save strength for real opponents.
    Now on the subject matter.
    without a detailed analysis of the weapons of potential opponents, the analysis of our weapons is not complete.
    and it’s not limited to AIM 120D missiles.
    The Americans have substantially changed the entire range of missiles and in fact they now have an advantage in both short-range and medium-range missiles, our range at distances of 100-200 km looks no worse,
    but it is extremely small in warehouses, which again leads to the advantage of the NATO Air Force. This is especially important, given the advantage of NATO aircraft in the configuration of radars and the use of stealth fighters,
    as well as the general factor of using large echeloned groups of aircraft with AWACS, electronic warfare and other functions.
    Well, the last. Missiles that have not been fundamentally developed for decades inevitably become weak against electronic warfare and other countermeasures. Ignoring this factor already has serious consequences and they will only increase.
  12. +5
    17 October 2019 13: 35
    30 years of the commodity economy have not passed without a trace. in a country where they closed everything that produced, everything that taught youth professions. Only effective managers and edrosovtsy remained. and links to the USSR which betrayed its own citizens. and rulers.
    do not justify their miscalculations and mistakes. in building a new industrialized state.
  13. 0
    17 October 2019 14: 08
    The correct answer is that they will not fight in anything, because there will be no war with the West
    1. -1
      18 October 2019 02: 04
      The West has already defeated the USSR in the 90th year, why should it fight with a state that is de facto its satellite?
  14. +3
    17 October 2019 14: 36
    Hmm, I read the article, as Professor Challenger would say, with surprise mixed with less flattering feelings. So, Su-30, Su-34 and Su-35 - it turns out to be just modernized Su-27s. If this definition can still be added to the Su-30, then in the Su-34 and Su-35 the airframe is new. But, since the article refers to explosives, it is much more important that the equipment is new, or rather, of a new generation.
    Further, we read - The main modification of the missile is the R-27R / ER with a semi-active radar homing head. Only the R / ER does not have semi-active radar guidance, but radio command + semi-active in the final section, which is far from the same. Those. , most of the flight time, that Amraam, that R-77 fly by inertial and are adjusted if necessary according to the Republic of Kazakhstan. And only in the final section the pilot who released the amraham can breathe a sigh of relief and screw it back and down. Advantage? Yes, of course, but, as always, there are nuances - after all, the power and diameter of the GOS antenna are more than limited and so far these antennas are ordinary SCAR. So it is still unknown what is better, especially if you need to grumble on a stealth aircraft.
    References to Chinese experts (which simply did not exist in the Ethiopian-Eritrean war), of course, inspire. Not that the technical condition of the planes and missiles, even the number of planes shot down, is not really known. At the airbase, one mum swore that they hadn’t shot anyone down.
    R-27T - when launched into the front hemisphere for a small target, the range will probably not exceed the launch range of missiles with an infrared short-range seeker such as R-73 and AIM-9.
    In fact, ZPS is also important and here the advantage of the 27T is undeniable. But in PPP, it’s not at all a fact that the range will not be better than Sayda. In addition to the range of the GOS capture, depending on the type of target, its height (the higher the better), the angle you need to look at the rocket engine’s operating time, generator’s operating time and other boring details. As for maneuverability, the sources give the target overload the same 8-9 g.
    As for the R-77, for such a scanty time — 3-4 years, they simply cannot displace missiles from the R-27, all the more so even now there are aircraft in service that cannot use the R-77. And the shelf life of rockets with solid propellant rocket engines cannot be extended indefinitely.
    1. -1
      18 October 2019 09: 53
      I completely agree with what you said. And I want to add from myself. To compare the tabular characteristics of the R-27 and AIM-120 given in open sources, you need to know the test methods for which this data was obtained. You also need to know how much and what is the difference between the R-27 rocket of 1987 and 2017.
  15. 0
    17 October 2019 15: 28
    It is clear that Russian fighters on clay feet, Hitler knew this.
  16. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      18 October 2019 10: 55
      Well, you yourself understand that real experts will not answer such questions even in PM.
  17. 0
    18 October 2019 02: 45
    Some individuals are inclined to believe that the Su-35e, being most likely initially noticed by the F-35mi stealth, will somehow come close to them and, twisting a variety of loops and bells, shoot them from aircraft guns. But this is fantastic. In reality, stealth, radar and missiles decide an air battle, and the fact that the fighters have air guns is approximately the same as the soldiers are still being taught hand-to-hand combat, which will take place in isolated cases. And just in all of the above, the Americans so far are unconditionally leading + and also in the number of leaders.
    1. 0
      18 October 2019 11: 00
      Do you think that the same 35th will detect other aircraft, carry out A / S, launch and go unnoticed? so it’s also fantastic. Not to mention that the WB is likely to pass not over the Atlantic or the Arctic Ocean, but on a certain theater of operations. And most likely, the 35th will be in a foreign radar field, and not vice versa
      1. +1
        18 October 2019 15: 25
        I do not compare with the theater, I do not even compare both aircraft, but the concept itself. The Americans put on stealth, radar and rockets, and in Russia they continue to tell what Su twist wonderful loops. I have little idea what is going to happen to make this close combat at air guns happen.
        1. 0
          18 October 2019 22: 40
          That is, do you seriously consider the military to be dense retrograde towns that are supposed to fight exclusively in the BVB? (although with high-quality electronic warfare, this is quite possible)?
          What is going to happen ? Well, for example, the work of the 35th radar will be detected even before it starts launching missiles (be the radar at least three times the LPI) and, therefore, it will not work with impunity and the active heads of the missiles can be drowned out - their energy is not very powerful, after which the BVB will happen
      2. -4
        22 October 2019 21: 21
        Quote: sivuch
        Do you think that the same 35s will detect other aircraft, carry out A / S, launch and go unnoticed?


        Why is science fiction? The F-35 EPR is less, therefore, ceteris paribus, they will detect the enemy earlier and launch earlier. And in order to catch a stealth plane with open hatches, you need to know where it is (as the Serbs caught the F-117).

        Quote: sivuch
        for example, the operation of the 35 radar will be detected before it starts launching missiles (be the radar at least three times the LPI)


        This statement is based ... on what exactly?
        1. 0
          23 October 2019 09: 00
          On some knowledge of materiel and tactics. Well, Northrop has been boasting for more than 20 years that its ALR-93 (V1), which is located on the F-16 C Block 50/52 and a number of other machines, completely discovers LPI.
          here from the Northropp site about AN / ALR-93 (V) 1
          https://web.archive.org/web/2011010...g … ALR-93.pdf
          Emitter types detected and processed, pulse wavelength, pulse doppler, pulse compression, jitter / stagger, pulse compression, pulse repetition interval (i.e., agile-frequency), agile frequency, and agile-frequency agile.
          So, ancient Birch, of course, will not detect radar operation in LPI mode - there is simply a different logic - all signals below the threshold are eliminated as noise. It’s hard to say about Pastel, but rather modern electronic warfare stations (where RTR is an integral part) are quite. Moreover, ground-based RTR stations, like Valeria.
          1. -3
            23 October 2019 12: 01
            Well, that is, F-16s will be able to detect LPI signals (your link has broken, so the conditions under which they are detected are not clear). But it's not about the F-16.
            1. 0
              23 October 2019 12: 41
              Well, yes, that's why I was reinsured by writing that Pastel may be will be able to detect LPI signals, and m. - no . Although there were allegations that the L-150-14 is also capable of such feats, but who really knows, it won’t write here. So I would have relied more on terrestrial RTR, especially if, God forbid, the databases begin, it is most likely not over the Arizona region and not over the Arctic Ocean. Those. - in its RL and RTR field
              1. -4
                23 October 2019 13: 14
                Quote: sivuch
                Those. - in its RL and RTR field


                Well, I think that the tactics of using the F-35 against unsuppressed ground air defense will be the same as the F-117 against Iraq - in complete radio silence, not including the radar (which was not on the F-117, EMNIP).

                But to face the F-35 with Su, in general, nowhere. I don’t believe in a global war, but local wars, where on the one hand F-35s will appear, and on the other - Su, there is no and is not expected
  18. -3
    20 October 2019 10: 47
    The Russian army will NOT fight the West.
    He will not even fight with Ukraine.
    Because it can’t.
    Could not defeat even bearded sheep farmers.
    But the population is quite capable of fighting.
  19. 0
    1 November 2019 21: 16
    And from what years in the US use aim-9? Not a museum piece? R-27 is quite a good rocket, a powerful warhead of 39 kilograms, dimensions allow you to place a good internal filling, a more powerful guidance head for example. Of course, modernization will not hurt, this is understandable. But the question is more about the outdated stuffing than the rocket itself. With a modern filling, this rocket will be more dangerous than the p77.
  20. 0
    8 December 2019 10: 22
    Only a complete or dispatched Cossack woman (in the words of Sidor Luty from the movie "The Elusive Avengers") can argue that Russia will fight the West with fighters. If such a war happens, then missiles with thermonuclear, well, in extreme cases, with nuclear warheads will be used