Published a video with the latest armored vehicle Stryker A1 MCWS

General Dynamics Land Systems released a one-minute video about its latest wheeled combat vehicle, the Stryker A1 MCWS. The video shows the operation of the 30-mm gun, which demonstrated high accuracy in firing conditions when firing on the go.

The Stryker A1 MCWS is the new generation of the Stryker Dragoon (ICVD) armored personnel carriers, which are currently armed with the 2 Cavalry Regiment located in Europe. The updated system is already ready for use in the US Army and Navy units. In the meantime, the newest Stryker was again presented at the AUSA (Association of the US Army) exhibition in Washington, where this year three divisions of General Dynamics demonstrate their achievements in the defense sector at once.

The Stryker A1 wheeled platform allegedly provides unprecedented survivability against mines and improvised explosive devices.

The machine is equipped with an 450 horsepower engine, an 910 amp alternator and its own local digital network. This armored personnel carrier, according to popular belief, is one of the most versatile, most mobile and safest in the entire US Army fleet.

Comments

[Kunica]

You won’t miss this barn.

[Lexus]

They "shed" will equip KAZ. The decision has been made, the implementation has started. In addition, modular protection provides for a significant decrease in the effectiveness of the destruction of cumulative warheads, as well as protection against 30-mm shells in the frontal projection and large-caliber bullets in the rest.

[neri73-r]

Quote: lexus

They "shed" will equip KAZ.

Judging by the video and looking at the tower from above and from the side, KAZ is already standing on the presented sample.

[Vadmir]

In addition, modular protection provides a significant reduction in the effectiveness of cumulative warhead damage, as well as protection against 30-mm projectiles in the frontal projection and large-caliber bullets in the rest.

It seems that the time has come to change the caliber of our BMP to 57mm.

[Private-K]

That is, not only did they put an extra ton of turret with an autocannon on a heavily overloaded chassis (without the possibility of driving off-road with a hard surface and overcoming an ordinary roadside ditch), so they would weigh several hundred kg more KAZ and add armor to the forehead of the hull. The beauty.
But how can they now hang "anti-guerrilla" bars if the tower "ate" the weight?
And how will the 30-mm autocannon raise the firepower! No, of course it will raise, compared with a 12,7-mm machine gun ... pull the expensive Stricker to a cheap BTR-82 - that is, yes. But, somehow, finely. And belatedly.

[Evil echo]

the video shows the operation of a 30-mm gun, which demonstrated high accuracy in the firing range when firing on the go.

Something did not notice. Advertising cutting and only.

[Azazelo]

In in, From what distance the shot was not clear, on the move or stood not visible. The fact that it drives fast, well, the duck and the TIGER with 30 also drives fast and small, and it also costs 10 times cheaper. That's who is able to change the game, as it says at the end - this is a TIGER with 4 corets.

[Lexus]

Full wheeled BMP. A good option to enhance the capabilities of previously released machines. It is a pity that the domestic K-17 Boomerang is still hanging.

[Gray brother]

Quote: lexus

Full wheel BMP.

No, they have the BMP "Bradley".

[Lexus]

In the "heavy" brigades. In "light" infantry fighting vehicles will be on a wheelbase, which is quite logical.

[Gray brother]

Quote: lexus

In "light" infantry fighting vehicles will be on a wheelbase,

They do not reach the BMP for protection.

[Zeev Zeev]

Actually superior to the armor of the BMP.

[Gray brother]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Actually superior to the armor of the BMP.

That this bucket had better booking than Bradley? Even I doubt it.

[Lexus]

They are not going to fight with "Bradley". But with the BMP-1,2, incl. those who have undergone budgetary modernization without enhancing armor protection will be able to compete.

[Gray brother]

Quote: lexus

But with BMP-1,2,

Well, in principle, yes, they are similar in terms of booking, if we compare the Stryker with additional booking with a “bare” BMP.
But in terms of flexibility, the Stryker loses because it cannot swim.

[Zeev Zeev]

Than BMP-2 and BMP-3

[Gray brother]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

and BMP-3

On the BMP-3 is already dopbronirovanie put and she has 100mm fluff, which decides.

[Zeev Zeev]

Even with the additional armor of the BMP-3, the Stryker is not inferior.

[Private-K]

Bullshit idiotic. The BMP-3 frontal reservation in the sector of 30 degrees has a resistance equal to 100 mm of a homogeneous armor. Stricker has nothing close.
Your commitment is already stupidly annoying. You become disgusted in your stubbornness.
And at the same time, tell us why such a wonderful IDF Stricker refused to take even "on good terms" (tm) and preferred to start tedious development / testing of a machine with completely different parameters.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Actually superior to the armor of the BMP.

And the tank too, take it to Ukraine, then you will exchange it for grub from the DNR men!

[Zeev Zeev]

What do you drag to all Ukraine? Complexes?

[neri73-r]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

What do you drag to all Ukraine? Complexes?

Whose will you be? (with)

[Zeev Zeev]

We are our own. Israeli. Neither your country, nor Ukraine are not related by any side.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

We are our own. Israeli. Neither your country, nor Ukraine are not related by any side.

You are very similar in style to the Ukrainians, and you have one goal.

[Zeev Zeev]

And what is our goal? Shame Russia? Grab your resources? To humiliate the Russian people? Yes, my God, that you live like that ...

[neri73-r]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

And what is our goal? Shame Russia? Grab your resources? To humiliate the Russian people? Yes, my God, that you live like that ...

Taki knew there would be this question! The goal is because of which here, on the resource, you and Ukrainians have one minus! We will not specify, you understand everything.

[Zeev Zeev]

I somehow do not care about the cons. And I don’t care about politics either. My interests are weapons and history.

[Private-K]

Well, what kind of weaving are you weaving? Shame on you? Stricker is the worst in its class.
An armored vehicle that is unable to drive off paved roads or only on hard dry ground cannot (well, cannot!) Be considered at least somewhat "good" and "complete".
This is a full VBCI. Boxer is complete. Even Wolverine \ Patria is a full-fledged BBM. And Stricker is oligophrenic with cerebral palsy.

[Zeev Zeev]

Can the Stryker only ride on hard ground?

[Private-K]

Yes. Is this news for you? Try to find a video where Stricker rides on shit or at least on soft soils. 95% video Streaker on the pavement.

[Zeev Zeev]

https://youtu.be/9Tw_b1Mq6Js
https://youtu.be/qJvfuCBZilU
https://youtu.be/Pdbi18Gh07g

[Private-K]

Oh yes yes! A puddle on the ankle. The driver of a single car tries to fly it in training sessions. Good driver.
Well, you did it. Found as many as two videos. Now, find a video of the joint exercises of the Polish BMP-2 and Strikers. BMP bags advance along the shit-clay-sand and sand, and the Strikers gradually ride alongside ... along type asphalt in the community; and the attempt to move off the asphalt ended in a jam in the first meters.
But there was no reason for T-eshuk to bring the tank — there is a pit one and a half meters deep — not every driver can handle it.

[Zeev Zeev]

Well yes. And the dirt is not so, and the pit is not deep enough. And in general it is asphalt. Or hard ground.

[Private-K]

Yes, the dirt is not like that. Yes, in the video pokatushki single cars, and not the real daily work of many tens and hundreds of cars. And, once again, I immediately said - 95% of the videos and images are exclusively on the solid, and not on the meadow grass.
In any case, Stricker is a combination of backwardness and drank. The Americans themselves, until they were squeezed by powerful censorship, cursed the Strikers in awe.
Now there are only two ready-made really good wheeled BBMs - Boxer and VBCI. You can add some of the Patria to those. In the future, there will be Boomer as an analogue of VBCI. And Stricker - in the furnace.

[Zeev Zeev]

Keep believing in it

[Private-K]

Judging by the apparent initial bias, the inability to adequately perceive criticism - a believer in the ability of Amers to violate the laws of physics and designing BBMs we have ZevZev.

[Zeev Zeev]

I am not a believer, but knowing the difference between homogeneous and combined armor. And my friend didn’t experience it at all, because he didn’t penetrate the combined RPG armor.

[Private-K]

Combined armor of what? On what? Where? An extra 8 tons to Stricker's weight? Well, she was oriented towards the old Soviet RPGs. And precisely such kits have long been worked out in the Russian Federation, in the Czech Republic, in Poland, and many more.

[Zeev Zeev]

So this armor and thus opposes the RPG-7, the old Soviet. The Ukrainians burned BTR-82 in the Donbass.

[Private-K]

So we are talking about the fact that Stricker in the basic version has a reservation the same as BTR-82; but at the same time, 5-6 times more expensive. And the retention of KUBCH by the Stricker is achieved due to the ADDITIONALLY hinged armor increasing the weight of the machine by 40%. The same kit is hung on any APC with the same result.

[Zeev Zeev]

So no. In the basic version, the armor is spaced, combined, with ceramic inserts, protecting against 14.5 mm and 155 mm fragments. And only then the blocks were hung, which further increased protection.

[Alexey-74]

With RPG removed from the first shot .........

[marshes]

Quote: Alexey-74

With RPG removed from the first shot .........

May He not let a Shaitanturbist come to him.

[Zeev Zeev]

We were hit by 115 RPGs hit Strykers over the year we had here, not one penetrated a Stryker, not one. Not any — no machine gun fire penetrated a Stryker inside. We did have a soldier that was killed in a hatch by an RPG — standing up in a hatch, and they fired from a building on top, but not one RPG penetrated a Stryker; 115 hits, it's a fantastic vehicle.

[Potato]

Well, yes, yes ... Fantasy, not fiction. Old RPG takes up to 40cm mm of homogeneous armor steel, and does not penetrate BMP. And do not try to prove the opposite. Do not!

[Zeev Zeev]

Diversity Armor.

[Private-K]

Have you learned a clever word? I have known him since 1986.
We are talking about the Stricker hung with ADDITIONAL armor + trellised screens. But these are tons and tons of extra weight, the already horseradish pepelats.
In the standard version, Stricker does not have any advantages in booking over the cheap BTR-82. The huge barn of Stricker weighs 17,2 tons, and the BTR-82 without a tower is approx. 14 tons. Due to the enlarged hull, the Stricker physically cannot have much better armor protection.

[Zeev Zeev]

It can’t, but it has

[Private-K]

Well, yes, the main thing is to believe in violation of the laws of physics. The base Stryker does not have any particularly better protection, even compared to the BTR-82. She has nowhere to take on the banal and most obvious weight characteristics.

[Zeev Zeev]

According to the banal laws of physics, the T-62 should be cooler than the M60. But this is not so.

[Private-K]

What, as soon as you receive a factual in person, and we begin to apply the logic of an unflattering assessment, are you immediately trying to leave the topic?
And, yes, M60A1 arr. 1961, with a weight of 54 tons, nothing is better than the T-62 weighing 37 tons. Even the reservation is not very different.

[Zeev Zeev]

No numbers. In fact, yes.

[Private-K]

Ahaha! On what such facts? The facts of what?

[Zeev Zeev]

On the facts of the meetings of Soviet and American tanks on the battlefields.

[Private-K]

On the battlefields, the first fiddle is played by operational-tactical, then the tactical ability to use troops, some of which are tanks. You have only one real cluster of examples - from the Arab-Israeli wars. However, again - an unbiased analysis in advance will show the approximate equality of these two machines. Despite the fact that the M60A1 was and was considered such, the crown of Western tank building at that time, and the Russian T-62 was considered a temporary measure and was already T-64.
And enough to get away from the topic of squalor Stricker! Pozornyatsky machine for world hegemon.

[Zeev Zeev]

No, the analysis will show that the T-62 ("temporary tank", produced longer than the T-34, T-54, T-55 and in the amount of 20 thousand units) and the armor is thicker, and the gun is steeper and the mobility is higher. And no tactical skill should compensate for the total lag (according to figures) of the M60 from the Soviet tank. Nevertheless, the tankers of Syria and Egypt, trained in the best Soviet schools, most often could not win not only the M60, but also the M48 in tank-to-tank battles.
And the Stryker is a well-protected vehicle that has proven itself well in battle.

[Private-K]

Give tsiferki and other indicators and criteria for the "total lag" of the T-62 from the M60.
In 1941, the Wehrmacht's panzergroups, even in "kopeck pieces" and "Czechs", managed to smash Soviet tank units on T-34 and KV. Although the T-34 and KV were better, much better. Here's the answer - the impact on the result comes from top to bottom. First, the strategy, then the operational-strategic level, operational-tactical, tactical in several floors and only at the very bottom of the performance characteristics of the vehicle itself.
If the Syrian tank battalion commander idiot exposes his battalion to an almost unpunished flank and even when the enemy’s fire exceeds the terrain from prepared positions and loses all 31 T-62 burned out, this does not mean the quality of the T-62 and does not exalt the quality to heaven Centurion.

[Zeev Zeev]

In general, the T-34 and KV were much inferior to the "triplets" in terms of smoothness, reliability and convenience.

[yfast]

Um, maybe they were training shots?

[Zeev Zeev]

Yeah. "Training" PG-7V

[Potato]

So, dear Zevzev, tell me what ceramic armor of this armor you can stop the cumulative jet (strike core for your) of the cladding metal, flying at a speed of up to 5 km / s after the explosion of grenade PG7V. For your information - such a thing pierces BMP 2 right through at least from the bow to the stern, in any projection, through its bulletproof armor and any obstacles in its path inside the armored car. And if in the way of its movement there will be an explosive shell or a powder charge, then ignition or detonation is guaranteed.

[Zeev Zeev]

Impact core and cumulative jet are two big differences. I advise you to smoke a little materiel. The penetration capabilities of the PG-7V are large, but even BMP-2 it will not penetrate from the bow to the stern, the jet will dissipate before it reaches the rear hatches.

[Potato]

Yeah ... So, you should google the materiel, that there are modern cumulative ammunition, and that is formed during the explosion of the PG7V grenade, due to which it has such crazy armor penetration.

Maybe it will dissipate, if through MTO. And if through the crew and the fighting compartment - does not dissipate. It is checked repeatedly. No reasonable spaced reservation without significant thickness of armored barriers will save. And the gratings are a very small chance that the grenade will fall apart before its detonator detonates. Or that with a very sharp angle of impact, it will go along along the main armor protection ...

[Zeev Zeev]

As if in the first military specialty, I’m quite a grenade launcher. And surprisingly even with RPG-7. So I have some idea of ​​the principles of work. And about armor penetration, too, including BMP (not just deuces, but units that we had a target).

[Private-K]

In fact, the dofiga of the penetration of both BMP-1/2 and Soviet-type armored personnel carriers through through two "walls". Full of cases, even in the memoir literature, is described.
In short - nichrome cumulative "jet" does not dissipate from the penetration of thin armor.

[Zeev Zeev]

В flankswhich your infantry vehicles are subtle to indecent. Through a dense fighting compartment, where the stream simply does not have time to disperse. And this is more likely true for the APC, and not the BMP.

[Private-K]

Well, tell us about the miracle of how the armored sides of American armored vehicles! Wow! Wow! Enlighten the gentiles! Tell me about the miraculously armored sides of the M113, Marder, AMX-10R ...

[Zeev Zeev]

I can tell you about the BRDM-2 frontal armor pierced by a burst from the 7.62x51 caliber machine gun from a distance of 200 meters. Bullets are ordinary, not armor-piercing.

[Private-K]

Ahaha! I also have a secret!
So where is the light of enlightenment about the miraculously armored sides? Once again caught and moving out for another? Not on that!

[Magic archer]

Develop Piranha Americans. I like the approach to booking. It is modular. Yes, it makes it harder, but the crew and the landing party are not so scared. From Ptur and RPG there is the possibility of installing KAZ. As a result, the Americans have one of the best armored vehicles in the world. And unfortunately, for the time being, only something like this is at parades. Fas minusators

[Private-K]

At Stricker, the main reservation for the nefig hull is not modular, but the most common thing is the welded box. And what is ADDITIONALLY hung is modular in its original essence.
Now, tell us how a huge Stricker's shed can have fundamentally better protection than even the BTR-82, if the weight of the striker is 17 tons, and the BTR-82 without a tower is approx. 14 tons. The difference of 3 tons goes to cover the fundamentally increased volume of "one of the best armored vehicles in the world." At the same time, the BTR-82A, even with an autocannon, costs 5-6 times cheaper than a Stricker with a machine gun.

[rocket757]

What a high one. Maybe this is the reincarnation of "Sherman"? The back is so similar in silhouette.

[Saxahorse]

Quote: rocket757

High oh what.

The wheels are disproportionately small. The Spanish Piranha does not look like that, it is more like our armored personnel carrier.

[rocket757]

The higher the unit, the greater the chances of getting to the top of the field.
A narrow base, a tall silhouette ... not familiar, at least, but also, that one is also swaying on its side.

[Private-K]

Everything is simpler - Strikers do not drive where you can fall on your side. STRIKER DOES NOT overcome any obstacles at all - even an ordinary roadside ditch on which the BTR-82 jumps like a sparrow on a branch.

[rocket757]

Quote: Private-K

Everything is simpler - Strikers do not drive where you can fall on your side. STRIKER DOES NOT overcome any obstacles at all - even an ordinary roadside ditch on which the BTR-82 jumps like a sparrow on a branch.

It’s interesting to imagine a wild fantasy! Striped equipment somewhere in the forests of the middle zone .... Euro-Asia ??? ..... not, in any way, further than 50 - 100 meters from any highway! Shaw is nothing.
Sales in YouTube, an experiment like "tanks are not afraid of dirt" .... not our experimenters drive OUR equipment and foreign ones, but very much of the past years !!! Such a feeling, sho technique they have become like modern "SUVs" ... seemingly large, formidable, but from the track neither - nor.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: rocket757

Such a feeling, sho technique they have become like modern "SUVs" ... seemingly large, formidable, but from the track neither - nor.

And the staff love everything big.

[rocket757]

Here, too, where necessary ... the largest icebreakers in the world !!! there is more if you look carefully!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: rocket757

the largest icebreakers in the world !!!

Well, basically it is. He loves people to be measured, who has more and cooler. And at the state level, too. Like small children.

[rocket757]

Measure real achievements! Why not?
To be measured by any bullshit, this is garbage.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: rocket757

Measure real achievements! Why not?

Take the American Ford Expedition. I never understood why such a huge bandura is needed. And aligarchs are measured by yachts, who have more. This is not an achievement, but ... Ponte ... If they themselves built them, then yes, an achievement. And then in Germany they order.

[rocket757]

Quote: Mordvin 3

This is not an achievement, but ... show off ..

Measured by what is ...

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: rocket757

Measured by what is ...

I understand that the civilian version of Hammer began to be released at the request of Schwarzenegger, he is a healthy man. But when I see a peasant crawl out of a huge jeep with a cap, or the same girl is climbing, it becomes funny. In this way they increase their self-esteem, but for some reason it is ridiculous to me.

[rocket757]

Come on, there is a video like a "kolobok" meter with a cap, in all coordinates, trying to roll out, crawl out, teleport from a low "Ferrari" or "lambardzhinni" .... there is a joke, the whole process \ feat for 10 minutes !! !
I didn’t see how he got in there ... s ... they teleported, I think it was no less fun!

[Evil 55]

This toad obviously doesn’t swim .. The weight is beyond the limits, it is intended for walking around Iraq or Texas .. even in Europe at the first exit from the concrete it will sink so that you won’t pull out the tank ..

[Zeev Zeev]

But this "toad" protects its crew and troops. Moreover, it protects well, the Americans did not travel on armor in Iraq or Afghanistan, although there were enough RPGs and IEDs there.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

armored in Iraq or Afghanistan did not go

Of course, I don’t want to violate the insurance contract, there will be no kindred payments after death on the armor, and not inside.

[Zeev Zeev]

What does it have to do with it?

[Berkut24]

The Americans in Kosovo preferred to travel on a carrying BTR-80. As for Afghanistan and Iraq, they had light armor with them easily. And the fact that relatively few are due to the constant hover of aircraft over positions. And there is one more factor. If an American soldier did not wear a bulletproof vest or turned out to be on wheels without an order, then he would lose insurance, and in many cases disability pension, in case of injury or contusion.

[Zeev Zeev]

In Fallujah or Nasariah aviation bearded with RPGs caught? Well then, the Yankees have super-ventilation

[rocket757]

Any equipment burns! Especially the one that goes on assignments, and not on the base, is protected by everything that is possible.
And so, stripes have a different method of self-preservation ......

[yehat]

Quote: lexus

It is a pity that the domestic K-17 Boomerang is still hanging.

why feel sorry for the armored personnel carrier at the price of a starship

[Lapunevsky]

Something tall, with a huge tower, travels through the countryside and shoots a cannon with a car. In other matters, like our trough, the Boomerang is also a tall and also an excellent target for ATGMs. Thus, the only salvation is a very specific KAZ.

[Zeev Zeev]

KAZ for Strykers is already being purchased. "Hetz Dorban" is called.

[Graz]

Well, I don’t know this is not an armored personnel carrier, but not a BMP yet, what is a new intermediate class and is it a big question

[Military77]

It’s interesting to CPV him in the boom, if the BS-41 is shot from 500m, it will pierce through?

[armata_armata]

It’s interesting to CPV him in the boom, if the BS-41 is shot from 500m, it will pierce through?

"Reservation provides all-round protection against being hit by 14,5-mm armor-piercing bullets and fragments of 152-mm shells during air blasting"
And yes, as far as I remember, it’s very difficult to find an armored personnel carrier in NATO countries that breaks through the CPV, because from the 80s of the last century, according to Western standards, an armored personnel carrier must provide circular protection against this caliber

[Military77]

Patriot also had to provide ... We need to give the barmaley to practice

[Evil echo]

To Kubinka for shelling, and then we'll see ...

[rocket757]

Value for money - quality, nobody canceled! Because "Bradley" has not been replaced until now for everything and everywhere,
the rich save too!

[Private-K]

That's how you are right.
However, we look at the weight of the BTR-82A without a tower - approx. 14 tons.
Striker - 17 tons. But the Striker case is MUCH more than the BTR-82. Those. the armor is smeared over a larger volume.
So where does the resistance to 14,5 mm come from, and even circular?

[Berkut24]

Noble bell tower. And what is in the photo - the front wheel has already lowered?