Zumwalt project: long-awaited final postponed again

29
The most daring project of the US naval forces at present is the construction of destroyers such as Zumwalt. This project uses the latest and most bold technologies, which leads to special complexity and numerous difficulties. The other day it became known that the lead destroyer again faces significant difficulties, and this again hinders the achievement of full operational readiness.


USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) in trials




Latest news


New messages about the failures and problems of the Zumwalt project on 9 were announced in October by Bloomberg news agency, citing the press service of the US Navy. The naval forces indicated the persistence of problems and another failure to meet deadlines. In addition, new plans for the first destroyer of the series were announced.

According to previous plans, the lead destroyer of the USS Zumwalt series (DDG-1000) was supposed to reach full operational readiness in September this year. However, these plans were not fulfilled. Testing and testing of on-board systems continues and faces some unnamed challenges. As a result, the Navy and industry are forced to continue to refine the ship.

The previously approved work schedule was disrupted, but the command approved a new one. Achievement of full readiness will not take place earlier than the second quarter of the 2020 calendar year. Due to the delay and the need to continue work, the Pentagon has requested additional funding in the amount of 163 million dollars.

No new information about the nature of the difficulties and problems was announced. According to earlier reports by the Navy and the media, the tests revealed numerous problems with overcomplicated computer systems, new weapons, etc.

Ship Record


The destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) is the lead ship of the project of the same name, whose task was to sharply increase the combat effectiveness of the American fleet. It was laid down in February 2011, and in October 2016 it was handed over to the naval forces. Since then, the ship has made several trips, but still has not reached a state of complete readiness for service and solving combat missions.



Against the background of real events, the initial plans for the program, which were formed in the middle of the 2000s, look extremely interesting. They planned to lay the lead ship in the near future and launch it in 2012-13. In the middle of the decade, he was supposed to begin his service. Due to subsequent problems in construction and testing, the schedule was revised, and all major events moved to the right.

In reality, it will take about nine years from the bookmark to the start of the ship’s full service - of which three and a half years have passed since the delivery of the Navy destroyer. To this you can also add the initial dates approved more than 10 years ago. The unacceptably long duration of construction, testing and refinement is a record and unpleasantly distinguish the current Zumwalt project from the rest of the American destroyers.

The anti-record is delivered not only in terms of time, but also in value. Early plans included the construction of 32 limited-cost ships. It was planned to spend 3,5 billion dollars on the lead destroyer, and not more than 2,5 billion dollars on serial ones

During the construction of the head USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000), the cost of the ship was constantly growing, which led to a reduction in the entire series to three units. The total cost of design and construction at the same time reached 22,5 billion dollars - an average of approx. 7,5 billion per ship.

The completion of the first destroyer was not completed, and new spending was planned for the next year. Thus, its value continues to grow. For the price, this ship with missile and artillery weapons has already caught up with the previous generation nuclear carriers.

Solving Problems


Over the past several years, the US Navy has regularly disclosed information on the progress of the development of the destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000). Recently in similar the news featured the first production ship USS Michael Monsoor (DDG-1001). USS Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG-1002) will soon join them.


USS Michael Monsoor Destroyer Baptism Ceremony (DDG-1001), 18 June 2016


Tests and refinement of the lead destroyer led to well-known results, and the Navy had to take the necessary measures. Together with several companies responsible for the construction of ships and the production of avionics, they conduct testing and development of the lead ship. Most of the shortcomings have already been fixed, and the elimination of the remaining takes only a few months.

According to various sources, the experience of testing and refinement of the head USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) was immediately taken into account in the construction of two other ships. The design was finalized, general ship and other systems were finalized, electronics was improved, etc. Thanks to this, as expected, the new destroyers will be deprived of a number of “inherent” shortcomings of their predecessor.

Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out yet that such an approach will allow timely elimination of all problems. First of all, it must be remembered that not all problems of the lead ship were identified and corrected before the testing of the following destroyers. Thus, shortly after delivery, the two ships will need average repairs to modernize the design and instrumentation.

The problem with artillery weapons remains unresolved. The Zumwalt destroyers carry two AGS 155 mm artillery mounts. The guns were developed for the use of guided projectiles of extended range LRLAP. Due to the complexity and lack of special commercial prospects, such a projectile was notable for its extremely high price - approx. 800 thousand dollars. As a result, in November 2016, the LRLAP project was closed. AGS installations were left without a single compatible ammunition and therefore stand idle on ships idle. There are no realistic plans for the return of artillery to service.

The long-awaited finale


And yet now the situation with the USS Zumwalt destroyer (DDG-1000) gives some reasons for optimism. This time, the achievement of full operational readiness was postponed for a shorter period, which indicates that there are fewer problems that need to be addressed. Thus, the ship can indeed begin full service after the first quarter of 2020.



The situation with the other two ships of the new project is not entirely clear. Their refinement may drag on for several years, but after the 2020, they will certainly enter the combat structure of the US Navy and will be able to solve the tasks.

Thus, in the Zumwalt destroyer project, the situation is characteristic of new and bold developments. Excessive technical courage leads to a mass of shortcomings, the search and correction of which requires time and money. However, no one is going to refuse new ships - and at any cost they will be brought to full service.

However, the appearance of only three revolutionary new destroyers will not have a significant impact on the combat effectiveness of the Navy. The main surface ships of the US Navy for the coming decades will remain the destroyers Arleigh Burke. Their construction continues, and they will have to serve for almost half a century.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    14 October 2019 18: 03
    I repeat - with the mass appearance of cheap drones - the entire expensive concept of stealth ship can be written off as scrap.
    1. +4
      14 October 2019 18: 19
      And already written off. Why is he generally stealth? Had to quietly go to the coast, CHEAPE to shell the coast with artillery and dump in the fog. The concept arose as a result of the use of battleships during the first Iraqi - it turned out cheaper than hollow aircraft carriers. But there is no art. Well, he will come to the shore, albeit imperceptibly, and what, bring laughter? winked There’s no art, I didn’t shoot rockets either - thank God too
      1. -1
        1 December 2019 13: 07
        There is no art ....- outplayed in tanks?
        1. 0
          2 December 2019 05: 39
          Video or photo of any shooting Zyama - rocket or art - from the training manual and into the studio! Never shot from anything. NO! Shells too - Н_Е_Т!
          Get ready for school. the cockerel sang for a long time laughing
    2. +3
      14 October 2019 21: 44
      Quote: lucul
      I repeat - with the mass appearance of cheap drones - the entire expensive concept of stealth ship can be written off as scrap.


      Why? What harm does a stealth ship get from penny drones and why don't these drones harm non-stealth ships?
    3. +1
      15 October 2019 10: 19
      Good luck with your errors).
  2. +2
    14 October 2019 18: 09
    hmm .... not just a golden Zumvolt ...
  3. +7
    14 October 2019 18: 13
    they built, they built ... well, they didn’t finish building ... there is where to cut further ... wink
  4. -2
    14 October 2019 18: 50
    We don’t need such ships, so we don’t have them.
    Toli case Poseidon, a unique weapon
    1. 0
      15 October 2019 10: 37
      Blessed is he who believes in a miracle weapon, he dies extremely disappointed).
      1. -2
        15 October 2019 10: 39
        Quote: Cyrus
        Blessed is he who believes in a miracle weapon, he dies extremely disappointed).

        But it goes to heaven, and the adversary just dies
        1. 0
          15 October 2019 22: 40
          Quote: Stils
          But it goes to heaven, and the adversary just dies

          I wonder who generally gives guarantees?
          To heaven and who the hell?
          To whom 40 virgins and who "just die" ...
          I understand that no one has complained yet (after death)
          but where is the guarantee? Nobody forbids to believe. Faith needs no explanation.
          And in guarantees too.
          But we are all here practical people of the 21st century. Words have little faith, but no guarantees!
          1. -1
            15 October 2019 22: 47
            You do not have enough words of the Guarantor? bully
            1. 0
              15 October 2019 22: 51
              Quote: Stils
              You do not have enough words of the Guarantor? bully

              I'm sorry, but how is it better than yours, mine, the words of any other person?
              What kind of person can guarantee at least something after life?
              And everyone can speak (and lie). Not everyone was lucky with the hierarchical ladder.
              1. -1
                15 October 2019 23: 03
                It remains only to believe, the other options are worse.
                In general, pure psychology, it is easier for a trained (believer) person to go to the other world, faith, hope, making his behavior more stable in special situations.
          2. 0
            8 December 2019 16: 12
            You do not very correctly interpret religion from the point of view of an atheist. There is hell. And paradise too. But he is in the heads of the living. Just like religion. Ka and god. Therefore, while people live, Hitler is in hell, Gandhi is in paradise, and God is in heaven. When people are gone, there will be no religion, no heaven and no hell.
  5. +1
    14 October 2019 20: 32
    [quoteо = Andrey VOV] hmm .... not just a golden Zumvolt ... [/ quote]
    It is not even gold, and not even platinum! Yes, and it’s hard to call it diamond! It’s hard to understand only one thing: from whom is it invisible? From the cowboy Joe? who was also uninteresting to anyone? He has never really left the base!
  6. 0
    14 October 2019 21: 45
    Quote: Good_Anonymous
    Quote: lucul
    I repeat - with the mass appearance of cheap drones - the entire expensive concept of stealth ship can be written off as scrap.


    Why? What harm does a stealth ship get from penny drones and why don't these drones harm non-stealth ships?

    Drones are the new eyes of the ship.
    What is incomprehensible here?
    1. +1
      14 October 2019 21: 57
      Quote: lucul
      Drones are the new eyes of the ship.
      What is incomprehensible here?


      Almost everything. "Eyes" - what is it: optics, radars, something else? How many of these drones can a ship carry? What is their range, ceiling? How is the set of sensors made "cheap"? Why should only stealth ships be written off, but not ordinary ones?
      1. -6
        14 October 2019 22: 02
        Just about everything

        Are you trolling something?
        Do you remember the cost of Zumwalt? And why is he so worth it? And the drone lowers him to the level of Arly Burke.
        What about the drone? Give him the opportunity to target designation and all.
        1. +1
          14 October 2019 22: 33
          Quote: lucul
          Are you trolling something?


          No and you?

          Quote: lucul
          Do you remember the cost of Zumwalt?


          Yes.

          Quote: lucul
          And why is he so worth it?


          Zumwalt is a whole range of new technologies. For example, he has a TSCI instead of Aegis, he has a new radar, a new sonar, a new gun, a new chassis (I don’t know how to tell propulsion more precisely). At the same time, he has a very small series - he must be expensive, with or without stealth. How much it costs stealth - we do not know.

          Quote: lucul
          What about the drone?


          So I ask - drone what? What is the penny drone equipped with, how far, high and long can it fly?

          Quote: lucul
          Give him the opportunity to target designation and all.


          First you need to give him the opportunity to see this goal - how will he do it? A radar is by no means a penny, that is, a drone is no longer a penny. Radar is also not grams, which means the drone needs an engine. The radar needs energy, which means the drone needs a powerful engine. Well and so on .. as a result, you will get (after several years of development) an unmanned analogue of an AWACS helicopter, not at all cheap and not massive.

          Or state your concept of a penny mass drone.
          1. 0
            15 October 2019 13: 43
            Zumwalt is a whole range of new technologies. For example, he has a TSCI instead of Aegis, he has a new radar, a new sonar, a new gun, a new chassis (I don’t know how to tell propulsion more precisely). At the same time, he has a very small series - he must be expensive, with or without stealth. How much it costs stealth - we do not know.

            Let's analyze the points?
            1. a new gun, well, first of all it should have been a railgun, does the fleet even need a new gun? Looks like no.
            2. A small series - so according to the plan, it was quite a rather big 32 ship.
            3.new chassis (I don’t know how to say propulsion more precisely) and it breaks all the time.
            4. Well, about the stealth that is not stealth, everything is clear.
            So it’s right: Zumwalt is a whole complex of new Deadlock Technologies.
            1. +2
              15 October 2019 20: 00
              Quote: bk316
              Let's analyze the points?


              Let's analyze it in bulk - your objections boil down to "it's their own fault" and "their tenology g *", and I answered the question "why is it so expensive." It's funny, but I see no contradiction between our statements.

              Quote: bk316
              Zumwalt is a whole complex of new dead-end technologies.


              Time will tell. Today, the TCSI, the undercarriage, and the new radars certainly don't look like a dead end. But the gun, of course, is an epic failure.
        2. 0
          15 October 2019 13: 37
          And the drone lowers him to the level of Arly Burke.

          DROPS? Yes, Burke is one of the most successful post-war ships. That is why such a large series. All tasks that the iron can solve could be easily and cheaply.
  7. -1
    15 October 2019 01: 18
    The author cited a lot of vague material.
    Meanwhile, the situation with the three Zumvolts has become very clear.
    1) It was decided to create three squadrons consisting of one Zumvolt
    and two Virginia submarines. Squadrons will operate independently of the AUG and
    attack enemy ships.
    2) It is possible to join 2-3 Littoral Ships to each of these squadrons,
    which are now undergoing amplification: on each mount two launchers
    Norwegian RCC with the new Lockheed GOS.
    1. 0
      15 October 2019 10: 25
      A reasonable decision, the US Navy is slowly preparing for war at sea.
      1. 0
        15 October 2019 13: 56
        I mean with China? Then an unreasonable decision. Reasonable at PRC destroyers 052d and destroyers 055
        12 pennants in China versus 6 in the USA over the past 5 years. This despite the fact that China has another 15 launched.
        1. 0
          15 October 2019 22: 45
          Quote: bk316
          12 pennants in China versus 6 in the USA over the past 5 years. This despite the fact that China has another 15 launched.

          quantity sometimes does not matter
          "In terms of the number of guns, yes," said Blood, smiling. "But in such matters, guns are not the most important thing."

          scares another. Once upon a time, the USA could easily launch a production conveyor (From AB to Liberty)
          And the Chinese is running quite well.
          Moreover, the traditions of conquering the seas have many millennia.
          But it was not in vain that the United States won its right as the mistress of the sea. And with blood and sweat.
          And now the US is the first to try new solutions. Although expensive, it may not be so inclusive. But how easy it is to criticize the first in failure!
          The pier is expensive, they say inefficient (and even compare with their previous ships)
          they say all this is a dead end!
          And who if not the Americans at all are trying risky new projects?
          Yes, they write off billions of paper candy wrappers - but moving progress (even sometimes terribly inefficient)
          But it’s easy for everyone to follow the leader along the beaten track!
          Although it is said about the Americans.
          Americans always find the only right solution. After everyone else has tried. - Winston Churchill

  8. 0
    28 December 2019 17: 34
    Lamborghini for the military did not go on sale lol

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"