Unknown pages of defense of Sevastopol: 35 coastal battery

40
Unknown pages of defense of Sevastopol: 35 coastal battery
German soldiers in battle in the area of ​​the 35th battery of Sevastopol. The Germans failed to crush our batteries with either artillery fire or with the help of aviation. On July 1, 1942, the 35th battery fired the last 6 shells with direct fire at the advancing infantry of the enemy, and on the night of July 2, the commander of the battery, captain Leshchenko, organized a battery detonation


At the beginning of the war, the defense of Sevastopol consisted of two armored 12-inch batteries, dozens of gun positions, many well-built defenses. Back in 1912, under the direction of engineer Cui, excavations for towers were dug, but construction was halted due to the revolution and the Civil War in Russia. In the thirties, the project was remembered and, with the help of military engineers, Sokolov and Vyshtkina were successfully completed. According to eyewitnesses, the amount of concrete work performed exceeded similar work in the construction of the Dnieper. The battery under the number 35 was located near Cape Chersonesos, and the battery under the number 30 was located near the village of Lyubimovka. The main part of the 35 battery is two gigantic reinforced concrete massifs with gun turrets. The first block housed ammunition depots, office space and barracks, and inside the second block was a post for controlling and adjusting the shooting and the power station. Not far from the blocks armored command posts were created. All the rooms were connected by underground passages. In extreme cases, there were two emergency exits to the sea. The armament of the 35 battery was based on two 305-mm turrets of two guns. Each shell weighed more than 450 kg, and the firing range exceeded 40 km. The towers could rotate 360 degrees by firing a roundabout. Initially, the 30 and 35 batteries were built to protect the city from the sea, but they soon had to become the center of defense from land.

G.A.Alexander and E.K.Solovyov


October 30 1941, the fascist troops tried to seize Sevastopol outright, but they were suddenly struck by an unprecedented power. The 30 battery under the command of George Alexander together with the forces of the Maritime Army fighters repelled the assault. Nevertheless, the Nazis took all the approaches to the city. 17 December 1941 after a powerful artillery preparation took place the second assault attempt. Five divisions went on the attack. The main task was to destroy the 30-th battery. But their efforts were in vain. And finally, on the morning of June 5, after the overwhelming fire of enemy artillery and mortars, the Nazi troops launched an offensive on the entire width of the front. Manstein wrote:
"In general, in the Second World War, the Germans never achieved such a massive use of artillery as in the attack on Sevastopol."
The self-propelled mortar "Karl" and the monstrous 420-millimeter stationary howitzer "Dora" were specially delivered here. But Russian troops fiercely repelled attack after attack. Over the next four days, the Germans lost about 20 thousands of people. The turning point occurred on June 17, when the 30 battery was surrounded. She shot all the shells, and the war survivors retreated to the tower massif. The fighting went into the inner rooms of the battery, the Germans poisoned the defenders with gas, there was no water or food. 20 and 21 June both towers were blown up. Many died a terrible death, the rest, as the commander of the battery Alexander, were captured by the Nazis and perished in the camps. After this, Manstein wrote:
“Despite these hard-won gains, there were still no signs of weakening the enemy’s will to resist, and the forces of our troops were noticeably decreasing.”


The German Dora super-heavy gun (caliber 800 mm, weight 1350 tons) at a position near Bakhchisarai. The gun was used during the storming of Sevastopol to destroy the defensive fortifications, but because of the remoteness (minimum firing range - 25 km) of the position from the targets, the fire was ineffective. With 44 shots with seven-ton shells, there was only one successful hit that caused an explosion of an ammunition depot on the north shore of the North Bay, which was at a depth of 27 m.


Since July 24, the defense of Sevastopol came to an end. With bloody battles, our troops and city residents went to the cape, to the 35th coastal battery. In black pea jackets and vests, sailors fought. Recklessly brave and courageous, they instilled terror into the hearts of enemies. The Nazis squeezed the ring, pushing the defenders of the city to the sea. There was nowhere to retreat. Every square meter of the Kherson Peninsula was abundantly watered with blood. Despite huge losses, Manstein decided to continue the infantry offensive and tanks with the support of aviation and artillery. The 35th battery constantly fired at enemy positions, being subjected to reciprocal reinforced bombing and shelling. As a result of a direct hit, the first tower was destroyed on June 23. When the shells ran out, the battery continued to shoot with cores, and then buckshot.

On 35 th BB

35BB, horizontal guidance post


At 22 hours on June 29, the Military Council switches to the 35th coastal battery on a reserve command post. The Coast Defense Command is being transferred there. fleet and the Primorsky Army. At night there is a regrouping of troops. From many battalions and regiments by this time only names remained. Aviation was completely destroyed, and a battalion of marines was created from the air force. June 30, Vice Admiral F.S. Oktyabrsky sends to the People’s Commissar of the Navy a report about the impossibility of holding Sevastopol. The letter contains a convincing request to evacuate the entire headquarters. On the night of July 1, the command staff of the military forces was shamefully taken out by arriving airplanes, leaving more than 80 thousand people for certain death! Over the past few days, about four thousand have managed to get out of them in various ways. For the further defense of the city, General P.G. Novikov. The general had one task - to fight to the end, and then try to go into the mountains.

After 1 July, Sevastopol was commissioned, at night at 0 hours 36 minutes by personal order of PG Novikov depth charges were exploded cellar ammunition and the first tower 35-oh battery. In 2 hours 31 the minute the second tower was blown up. But even more than ten days of the last forces of tens of thousands of people defended the approaches to it. The Germans burned them with flamethrowers, threw grenades and burned them with gas. Forces defenders declined by the hour. There was no water, ammunition, hope. Medical Lieutenant V.I. Luchinkina writes in her diary:
“It was already 5 or 6 July. After another attempt to break through to the partisans, we decided to bury our party and Komsomol tickets. There were five of us. It was decided: each of us would shoot himself in order not to be captured. I did not hear the shots because of the concussion. ”
Aviamekhanik V.N. Focuses:
"They tried to break through to the partisans, but there was no weapons.
We went under the rocks in the airfield. There were many wounded, moans, shouts, a huge mass of people. We waited for the ships, but then realized that we were abandoned to the mercy of fate. Terribly tormented by hunger, but especially thirst. They drank sea water and diluted it with sugar. ”
And here is a note from an unknown hero:
“During the fighting on July 1, almost half of the personnel failed. We were exhausted, we had no food, no fresh water, we drank the sea, and even that was difficult to get in the line of the day. We again took up the defense. Without sleep, without food, the last bullets were shot, and yet all day July 3 held back the onslaught of the enemy. At night the ships were waiting, but they did not arrive. ”
After capturing exhausted warriors on the surface, fighting continued in the casemates of the battery, where the most desperate brave men who did not wish to surrender to the Nazis gathered.




After the end of the war, the 30 battery was rebuilt. She was armed, and she is one of the active military units of Russia. The 35 battery was destroyed much more. In the 90s, the territory of the battery began to be built up with private houses, cottages, hotels. But the caring people of Sevastopol did not allow to build on bones. Now, on the site of the 35 battery, a memorial complex has been created, in which all the work was carried out only at the expense of public donations. On the territory of the complex there is a pantheon in which all the names of the defenders of the city known to date are carved.



German soldiers on the destroyed tower number XXUMX (western) 2-th coastal battery of Sevastopol.
From the first days of the defense of Sevastopol (from November 1 1941), the 30-i battery under the command of Captain G. Alexander fired in parts of the German X-Menxtein X. Numx-assaulting army, advancing to the main base. 11 June 26, the Germans broke into the tower block and took 1942 into captivity of its last defenders, all of them injured and exhausted from hunger and thirst.
After the war, the battery was restored. Now this object is in the composition of the coastal forces of the Black Sea Fleet


Broken equipment on the approaches to the 35-th battery of Sevastopol - the last line of defense, from which the advancing German troops fired to the last shell


Officers of the German army and navy on the broken Soviet armored battery No. XXUMX (BB-35) of Sevastopol


Destroyed turret gun installation №1 35-th coastal battery of Sevastopol
Fire battery Unknown drama of Sevastopol (Russia) 2011 year

In 1943, Leonid Utesov for the first time performed the song "The Covenant Stone" by Boris Mokrousov. And soon the whole country picked her up: "The wide waves of the Black Sea raise the cold waves. The last sailor left Sevastopol - he leaves, arguing with the waves ...." The song breathed mystery, excited by riddles. As if the authors knew more than what they could say at the time.
What treasured stone are we talking about? This movie - story the legendary 35 coastal battery, tragic and heroic at the same time. The 11 Army of Manstein, one of the best formations of the Wehrmacht, stumbled over the "Russian Gibraltar", and this significantly weakened the position of the Germans at Stalingrad.

It was here in June-July that 1942 received their last fight 80000 from the defenders of the hero city. It was here in those terrible days was the headquarters of the Sevastopol defensive area. It was here, in the cabin-battery campaign, that the last joint meeting of the Military Councils of the CPR and the Primorsky Army was held, which resulted in a decision to end the defense of Sevastopol and evacuate the commanders.

Thus, the territory of the battery has become a kind of quintessence of the people's feat and the people's tragedy.

In the post-war period, the 35-i coastal battery was not restored, however, part of its structures was used under the existing 130-mm coastal battery, due to which the appearance of the reinforcement was preserved for us almost intact.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cobra66
    +8
    12 July 2012 08: 07
    The men held on for a long time, the Germans rounded up decently then
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      -1
      12 July 2012 11: 06
      12 inch guns, the legacy of tsarism! am
      1. 755962
        +2
        12 July 2012 19: 28
        Quote: Yoshkin Cat
        12 inch guns, the legacy of tsarism

        And how relevant were also in the Second World War. Here I found a complete photo selection of the 35th coastal battery, I was very impressed. You will not regret it.http://users.livejournal.com/_iverson/104349.html
      2. +2
        12 July 2012 20: 05
        On the "thirty" there were towers from the "Empress Maria" that exploded in the bay of Sevastopol in 1915. On the 35th battery were already Soviet guns.
  2. +5
    12 July 2012 08: 31
    Here is another 1 page of history that we remembered. This is not written in history books, but it's a pity!
    1. Suvorov000
      +5
      12 July 2012 09: 50
      True, it was written for a long time in the journal "Technology of Youth", but I have never seen a written mention anywhere else
      1. 0
        12 July 2012 14: 50
        In the memoirs there.
        "On the fairways of Sevastopol", by .. Glushko or Glukhov, I could be mistaken.
        "Krasny Kavkaz" - memories of a cruiser commander.
      2. +1
        12 July 2012 15: 36
        Quote: Suvorov000
        True, it was written for a long time in the journal "Technology of Youth", but I have never seen a written mention anywhere else

        That's right, I have a binder with this magazine. It's just about firing cores, it's a spreading cranberry. Cores from rifled guns? The author burns. They even shot idle, and a stream of gases of enormous temperature and pressure swept away the German infantry.
        1. +2
          12 July 2012 17: 03
          Quote: revnagan
          about firing kernels is a spreading cranberry

          Probably practical shells - blanks are meant. Somewhere I saw such Old.
        2. 0
          16 July 2012 22: 37
          The blanks were under the cores, they really shot when the high-explosive Oscans ended .... I can’t understand for what purposes ...
          1. Askold
            0
            16 November 2013 21: 28
            training shells for guns of all calibers did not have an explosive charge and were ordinary steel blanks. Officially, these training shells have been called "steel core" since tsarist times. Although in the philistine understanding of the cores - that is, they were not balls, but had a completely normal streamlined shape of an elongated ordinary projectile, people far from artillery immediately forget the first word from the name of a steel ball, and call only the second, mistakenly thinking that they were shooting round balls.
          2. +2
            19 February 2014 20: 37
            Quote: Bosk
            The blanks were under the cores, they really shot when the high-explosive Oscans ended .... I can’t understand for what purposes ...
            In the already mentioned article from "T - M" "Land battleship Alexander" said that training blanks were fired at tanks. Crumpled into an accordion.

            They even shot light and blanks on infantry with 100m. They said that it swept away like leaves in October. As far as the truth, I will not say.

            But about the use of gases by the Germans in that article not a word. Strange why? Really silent for political reasons. Something is not believed. Most likely, they did not dare to use gases.
  3. +6
    12 July 2012 09: 03
    Eternal memory to those who fought to the last
    1. 0
      27 October 2013 17: 42
      Eternal memory, land in peace!
  4. +7
    12 July 2012 11: 06
    They didn’t write in Soviet times, apparently due to the fact that the entire command almost jumped off leaving their fighters and they kept on their own for several more days.
    1. CC-18a
      +1
      13 July 2012 07: 34
      They wrote that I remember somewhere off the page that was in the standard history textbooks. You see the pros put those who did not study in the USSR.

      The command left after they lost altitude without which defense was meaningless!
      Evacuation by sea was dangerous, for a couple of days of transports, 25% of the current remained. The remaining 25% during the last evacuation almost every 2 died, if I am not mistaken, the biggest catastrophe with the death of the ship was at that time and it was during the evacuation of fighters from Sevastopol.
      Even before the loss of altitude, the harbor was also lost more precisely, it let the enemies get close enough for shelling ships, because of which the supply of ammunition was minimized and it was not enough.

      In general, I consider the evacuation of command personnel in Sevastopol to be true, the commanders were necessary and sensible. But during the defense of Kerch, there it wasn’t worth the evacuation of the commanders, the Mehlis was there.
  5. +6
    12 July 2012 11: 27
    HEROES! EVERLASTING MEMORY!
  6. tverskoi77
    +2
    12 July 2012 12: 51
    Very well-known pages of the defense of Sevastopol for people who appreciate the feat of sailors and soldiers. Article +, it is necessary to talk about it ALWAYS!
  7. 0
    12 July 2012 12: 53
    ETERNAL MEMORY OF Fallen HEROES, HEALTH ALIVE.

    I liked the article very much. Just not a big clarification. The German Karl mortar was 420-mm, and the Dora gun was 800-mm.

    But to this quote "When the shells ran out, the battery continued to fire cannonballs, and then buckshot."

    If anyone knows, can he explain how a 305-mm gun could fire cores? As far as I remember, when the shells ran out of battery, it continued to fire with powder charges. When the infantry comes close it causes significant damage.
    1. +3
      12 July 2012 14: 53
      Well, overlap, okay.
      We will not find fault.
      Look, in Pirates of the Caribbean, the Black Pearl shoots with forks and spoons. Even a monkey.
      Nothing, look. Giggle.
      And here - it was necessary .. to hammer under a hat. Kernels and buckshot.
      Given the caliber - what kind of NUCLEA-A-A-A-A is that?
      And buckshot - respectively?
      1. 0
        12 July 2012 15: 41
        Igarr
        And here - it was necessary .. to hammer under a hat. Kernels and buckshot.
        Given the caliber - what kind of NUCLEA-A-A-A-A is that?
        And buckshot - respectively?


        Do not be lazy to google before you write posts, and even more so criticize! Cores are understood to be practical shells, such as iron blanks, and buckshot are shrapnel shells, if it’s simple, then these shells have a charge in the form of small (comparatively) balls that fly when shot in the form of a sheaf along the path of a shot, like in a hunting rifle!
        1. Brother Sarych
          0
          12 July 2012 16: 24
          Probably everything is right about practical shells, although the meaning of such a shot is not quite clear - half a ton of cast iron in a clean field? So what? The construction is sensitive. and infantry is pointless ...
          But were there shrapnel or buckshot shells in the ammunition of twelve inches? Do not forget that the barrels of guns of such a large caliber are extremely limited in the number of shots - it seems you can make only a hundred, and then change the liners, otherwise pieces of metal fly from the trunks. and the shells are flying quite the wrong way. where they are sent!
          1. 0
            16 July 2012 22: 49
            The laners went in a komplegte to the batteries and on one battery during the siege I know for sure what they changed, a veteran at school told us how he was in charge of security. For the night, they changed though by the standards more was needed. But as for buckshot ... rather they were shrapnel shots they really were included if I was unmistakable they were dummy as a progressive landing craft and they were also thought for firing at low-flying targets, by the way they shot and, with bare charges, burst into the enemy’s 300 meters burst clean.
        2. +2
          12 July 2012 16: 33
          Thank neri73-r
          I will definitely take your advice on googling.
          And even, I will not criticize. Only I will google.
          ".. By nuclei we mean practical shells .."
          Is this an article? Or a crossword puzzle? Or sudoku? Or a charade? Or a rebus?
          ".. and buckshot is shrapnel shells" - buckshot is buckshot, shooting with buckshot involves the use of - shells equipped with buckshot.
          Not what you write.
          Connoisseur.
          So ... google to help you.
        3. +1
          13 July 2012 13: 18
          Dear, do you know how buckshot differs from shrapnel? The fact that after the shot shrapnel flies a certain distance and only then explodes and hits. Russian "unicorns" are a vivid example when the elliptical shape of the barrel cut allowed to cover the infantry with dense fire. But I never heard about the shooting from a 305-mm cannon with buckshot. Probably the author made a typo.
          1. 0
            16 July 2012 22: 53
            I don’t know how the author is there ... but the Japanese had battleships, though I read that there was buckshot, but it seems to me that they meant shrapnel.
            1. +2
              19 February 2014 20: 43
              Quote: Bosk
              the Japanese had battleships, though I read that there was buckshot, but it seems to me all the same they meant shrapnel.
              Most likely shrapnel. I read somewhere (so as not in Pikul's "Requiem ...") that "Tirpitz" fought off one of the Allied air raids with shrapnel. And even the GK fired.

              I can not vouch for truth: for what I bought - for that I sold.
  8. loc.bejenari
    0
    12 July 2012 15: 15
    the author forgot to mention that they blew up the battery in the best Soviet traditions - with the people there
    moreover, the shells in one of the towers still remained — the battery was able to fire — though then there was no particular sense from that firing — the terrain did not allow
    though after the explosion of the Inkerman adits there was already nothing to be surprised
    and yet, it was from the 35th battery that the high command shamefully escaped through an underground adit going to the pier
    and then......
    some tears and emotions ....
    and 35000 abandoned people
    and also, the first photo with German sappers is the 30th battery before undermining the surviving tower
    and under the cores the author probably meant shells for practical firing - blanks
    buckshot by the way in 305 mm guns is missing a priori - so this is another fiction
    but in general Sevastopol - a symbol of heroism of a simple soldier and betrayal of high command - shamefully saving his skins
    1. +3
      12 July 2012 15: 42
      Quote: loc.bejenari
      the author forgot to mention that they blew up the battery in the best Soviet traditions - with the people there

      Well, what’s interesting is that it turns out that an evil red commissar crawled up and slowly set fire to the Bikford cord in order to kill more Soviet fighters in this way, in case they wanted to surrender. don't give it to the Fritz. SAMI, you see, not a Jewish commissar-communist bloodthirsty. What can I say to you ...
      1. Brother Sarych
        +3
        12 July 2012 16: 26
        But there’s no one to ask, who and how was undermining ...
        The heroic, and at the same time very bitter period of our history ...
      2. tverskoi77
        0
        12 July 2012 17: 09
        He forgot to say that this commissar was Putin))))))))))))
      3. 0
        13 July 2012 13: 45
        Sorry if I interfere with your conversation. There is not a bad film about this called "The Seekers. Invisible City". Look you won't regret it. And if the battery fired with practical shells, then the author should write so and not invent cannonballs for 305-mm cannons.
    2. +2
      12 July 2012 15: 43
      You better remember how you fled to the West in the 43 and 44 years after, or even ahead of your masters !!!
      1. 0
        12 July 2012 15: 47
        Quote: neri73-r
        You better remember how you fled to the West in the 43 and 44 years after, or even ahead of your masters !!!

        I don’t understand, who are you talking to?
        1. loc.bejenari
          -3
          12 July 2012 17: 07
          I understand, the keyboard will endure everything
          read better Vaneev -Chronicle of the defense of Sevastopol
          she is online online
          everything is painted according to the clock who and what did
          who fired back to the last cartridge
          who in a submarine escaped leaving their troops
          and if you do not know anything about the undermining of the Inkerman adits and the undermining of the 35th battery, then at least do not show your ignorance and do not write opuses about Bendera again (this is for clinical and ... comrade)
          and for revnagan, the evil Jewish commissar did not set fire to the Bickford cord
          the order was given by the runaway leadership who did not care about the people left there - for them it was a consumable
      2. loc.bejenari
        -1
        12 July 2012 17: 07
        are you pretending or true and .... t?
      3. +2
        19 February 2014 20: 49
        Quote: neri73-r
        You better remember how you fled to the West in the 43 and 44 years after, or even ahead of your masters !!!
        Well, thanks ... Such a passage, I think, is a reaction to the flag. And the fact that Oktyabrsky escaped, leaving Sevastopol, I'm sorry - a fact. Bitter, sad and shameful. It is precisely in his memoirs that he describes this episode more and more with general phrases, pressing heroism and patriotism more and more: look, you’ll look good yourself.
  9. Rikoshet
    0
    12 July 2012 15: 58
    The ships were waiting, but then they realized that we were left to the mercy of fate.
  10. Jib
    Jib
    +3
    12 July 2012 17: 44
    The other day I specially visited the Maritime Library of Sevastopol, where I got acquainted with archival materials of the military-historical conference held in May 1961 in the Sevastopol House of Officers. Published on October 25, 1961 by the Military Historical Society of Admirals, Generals, Reserve Officers and retired, the Collection of materials of the military historical conference dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the Heroic Defense of Sevastopol 1941-1942 contains three volumes of materials of 500 pages each (speeches, reports, reference material).
    Among the 800 people participating in this conference, 700 people were captured by the Germans. These people, having gone through Hersonissos hell, later survived the years of humiliation, deprivation and torture, the cruelty of German captivity and most of them the shame of Soviet imprisonment. The stigma of the “enemy of the people" for a long time passed from father to children. At the conference, this topic was held in the docks of almost every speaker.
    In general, it was not customary to talk about these real heroes in Soviet times.
    Of the 40 speakers at the conference, 20 admirals and generals spoke about their heroic deeds during the defense period. Only Chief of Staff 345 SD Colonel I.F. Khomich and Chief of Artillery 109 SD Colonel D.I. Piskunov, in their speeches, tried to touch upon the theme of history and the fate of prisoners of war in the region of the Kherson Peninsula, Cossack, Kamyshova, Feolente and generally in Sevastopol. In the last week of the city’s defense. Eternal memory and glory to the defenders and liberators of this glorious city. Respect for those people who do not give plow up the memory and history of the Second World War.
    1. +1
      12 July 2012 20: 22
      In fact, only the defenders of Sevastopol "were not put in the line" being in captivity, the command realized their guilt before the abandoned defenders of Sevastopol. After checking for cooperation with the Germans in captivity, all the prisoners of war were fattened and sent to the ranks (some still took part in the eviction of the Crimean Tatars in 1944, - I talked in the 80s with such a person from Sevastopol, who survived captivity, - pity to the evicted - was not! The eyewitness knew why they were evicting "the people who suffered from Stalin (??? not for their sins?)") And in confirmation of the rapid restoration of prisoners in the ranks of the Red Army who were there in Sevastopol - the example of A. Dubinda: from the spring of 1944 until the Victory Day (less than a year of war), the guy "came off" at the Germans so that he became a FULL CAVALER OF THE ORDER OF GLORY AND A HERO OF THE SOVIET UNION !!! And there were only 4 such people in the entire history of the WAR !!!
      1. Jib
        Jib
        +3
        12 July 2012 22: 24
        I agree with you. But unfortunately, 1 out of 7 - 10 fighters captured captured survived. About 1 out of 30 returned to the stand and was able to fight. The bulk of those who were able to survive after captivity hell did not fight.
  11. +1
    12 July 2012 20: 12
    Nuances in the "minus" article: on October 30, not the 30th battery opened fire on the Germans, but the 54th, under the command of II Zaika. It stood near Nikolaevka, and according to the order of the Oktyabrsky Black Sea Fleet, it was the first salvo of the 54th battery that initiated the defense of Sevastopol from October 30, 1941, to July 1942. The 54th battery for 3 days (!!!) delayed the movement of Tsygler's motorized brigade to Sevastopol (4 pcs. 100 mm cannon and 120 batteries against a whole motorized brigade !!!). And yet the "ochepyatka" not on July 24, but on June 24, the defense of Sevastopol came to an end (the paragraph in front of the photo of the personnel of the 35th battery sitting on the grass). We need more shield! Shielding !!!
  12. +4
    12 July 2012 22: 28
    Everything was. And rot, and heroism, and fear, and indifference. The main thing was people, there was faith, life was. Therefore, GLORY to the defenders. Despite the betrayal or betrayal or cowardice or something else, they completed their task. You don’t have to argue, but think that we could do it NOW?
  13. Egor
    +3
    12 July 2012 23: 28
    I am surprised how ??? we with such a command just won. Eternal memory to the dead. Glory to the heroes.
    1. CC-18a
      0
      13 July 2012 07: 40
      Which one? In Sevastopol, they normally commanded, well, maybe 1 tactical mistake was made for the whole time. In your opinion, if they were mediocre, did the Germans stagnate for so long with the overwhelming superiority and blockade of the city? there is no cane.
      An excellent example of Kerch, there are all conditions for holding the defense, but specifically because of the command’s actions, specifically the Mehlis, the defense fell in a couple of hours, and Sevastopol fought for months.
      1. +1
        13 July 2012 14: 02
        Dear, there is only a difference, Sevastopol was a fortress city and the main base of the Black Sea Fleet, and in Kerch, in addition to the steppes and the battery in the village of Chelyadinovo, there was practically nothing; the fault of the mehlis and the command was that they did not organize defense and reconnaissance , and the defense that was organized was unable to withstand the Germans. I did not read long ago that if during the Kerch-Feodosia landing operation our command would strike from Sevastopol, it could be such a blow that a group of German troops under attack from two the thoron would simply cease to exist. But it would be out of category if it were. And so the landing operation fulfilled its role, it distracted German troops from Sevastopol, though almost all the troops on the Kerch Peninsula either died or were captured.
        1. CC-18a
          0
          13 July 2012 14: 45
          Do not believe all sorts of tales.
          It’s funny to read you, the infantry divisions with almost no cartridges attacking the Wehrmacht’s tank divisions with full supply laughing . Thank God there was no one like you in the command of Sevastopol, but that the defense would have lasted a couple of hours, you are very similar in thinking to the Mehlis, he also believed that it was not necessary to build a defense, it was not necessary to plan, but he would stupidly break the enemy.

          PS: to defend a narrow section of the front in an open area is easier than a surrounded city.
  14. CC-18a
    +2
    13 July 2012 07: 23
    our sailors fight on land worse than the devil am
  15. GHG
    GHG
    0
    13 July 2012 23: 26
    Good selection http://www.bellabs.ru/30-35/Photos-35.html
  16. 0
    16 July 2012 23: 07
    I am quite interested in the topic of coastal artillery ----
    best and most detailed work ---
    http://www.bellabs.ru/30-35/30.html