Ukrainian coastal missile system "Neptune"

114 604 34
In the framework of the exhibition in KievWeapon and Security 2019" the Ukrainian defense industry presented its new product – missile the Neptune complex based on the chassis of KrAZ all-terrain trucks. The exhibition will last in the capital of Ukraine from October 8 to 11. The Neptune cruise anti-ship missile was first demonstrated in Kyiv back in 2015. But now the complex is increasingly being designed as a Russian analogue of the Bal mobile coastal missile systems, only on the chassis of the new Ukrainian four-axle KrAZ trucks.


Complex RK-360MC "Neptune"




Soviet legacy of Neptune


After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine got a fairly powerful military-industrial complex. True, as in the military-industrial complex of the Republic of Belarus, he had one peculiarity - a low proportion of finishing developments of weapons and military equipment. In the USSR, the share of Ukraine in such developments amounted to only 7 percent, the all-Russian weekly newspaper “Military-Industrial Courier” (issue of June 17 of June 2009) reports in the article “Choice for Ukraine”. Like the military-industrial complexes of other union republics, the military-industrial complex of Ukraine was primarily tied to cooperation with the Russian military-industrial complex to supply a number of components and components for assembling finished products. This, along with the general economic crisis and political instability in the post-Soviet period, caused the deplorable state of the defense industry of independent Ukraine.

At the same time, Kiev, of course, is able to independently develop and produce a wide range of weapons and military equipment: from automatic weapons and trucks to tanks and various light armored vehicles, as well as missiles of all types and even warships. Another thing is that the restoration of the military-industrial complex, as well as its development and the creation of new enterprises and design bureaus will require great efforts from the military-political leadership of Ukraine. In the meantime, many developments of Ukrainian military companies, one way or another, are based on the common Soviet heritage of our states. In this regard, the new Ukrainian anti-ship missile R-360 is no exception.

Like the Russian X-35 missile from the Bal coastal missile defense system, the Ukrainian Neptune is designed to destroy surface targets with a displacement of up to 5000 tons. That is, this cruise missile can be used to combat enemy destroyers, frigates, cruisers and transports, as well as landing ships and tank landing ships and barges, acting both as part of separate naval groups and landing squads, or independently. In addition, the Ukrainian side reports that the missile can also be used to strike coastal radiopaque targets. The use of the rocket does not depend on weather conditions and time of day.


Launch of the R-360 Neptune missile


One glance at the new Ukrainian missile is enough to understand that it has a lot in common with the Soviet anti-ship missile X-35, which was adopted by Russia already in 2003. At the same time, tests of this cruise missile continued from 1983 of the year. When looking at photographs of two products, a layman is unlikely to be able to distinguish one rocket from another. Today, the Russian X-35 missile can be used both from ships (the Uran missile system) and as part of the Bal coastal missile systems. It is also possible to use from air carriers. The Ukrainian side also claims that the R-360 missile is universal, the possibility of use from ground launchers (test launches are already underway), from ships and aircraft, has been announced.

Engineers from the state-owned Kyiv design bureau Luch are responsible for the creation of the new Ukrainian anti-ship missile. The Motor Sich association is responsible for the creation of the engine. Experts have no doubt that the new Ukrainian missile is an adaptation of Soviet and Russian developments on the Kh-35 to the new Ukrainian realities. Considering that the USSR expected to deploy the assembly of the new Kh-35 anti-ship missile bodies in Kharkiv on the basis of the Kharkiv aviation plant, and the Russian Federation, beginning in 1993, continued cooperation with Ukraine on the X-35 rocket project, there is no reason to doubt that the Ukrainian side had the necessary set of technical documentation. Moreover, back in 2002, Kyiv received from its Russian partners a reference model of the new Russian X-35 rocket.

If we talk about the power plant of the new Ukrainian missile, then it also leads its way from Soviet developments. The MC400 bypass turbojet engine manufactured by the Zaporozhye Motor Sich company is based on similar Soviet engines TRRD-50 and R-95-300, which were originally developed for installation on various types of subsonic aircraft: cruise missiles, target missiles and drones. Naturally, progress does not stand still. If for the R-95-300 the declared dry weight was 95 kg, then for the MC400 it decreased to 85 kg, while in principle these are the same engines with the same thrust and overall characteristics, simply made at a different technological level, primarily in terms of the materials used and how they are processed.



The composition of the rocket complex "Neptune"


The composition of the new coastal defense missile system is already known and published in Ukrainian publications. The RK-360MC complex includes:

1. Mobile command post RCP-360, designed for automated control of parts of the coastal defense complex, crew - 5 people. The maximum deployment time on the ground is no more than 10 minutes.

2. The P-360 anti-ship missile itself in the TPK-360 transport and launch container. For a rocket, the manufacturer declared the following characteristics: mass - 870 kg, warhead mass - 150 kg, missile diameter - 380 mm, firing range - from 7 to 280 km, flight height above the crest of the wave - from 3 to 10 meters. The missile features include the fact that it can be used for strikes and on ground targets.

3. The USPU-360 unified launcher based on the chassis of the four-axle KrAZ-7634НЕ vehicle with the wheel formula 8х8. The installation is intended for placement, transportation, temporary storage, as well as directly launches of the P-360 anti-ship missile. Each launcher has four such missiles.

4. Transport and loading machine TZM-360, which is designed for temporary storage, transportation and transshipment of four TPK-360. The declared deployment time is 10 minutes, the time of reloading missiles is up to 20 minutes, the calculation of the machine is 3 people.

5. Transport machine ТМ-360, designed for temporary storage, placement and transportation of TPK-360.

6. Set of ground equipment.


Mobile command post RCP-360


Estimated structure of the missile complex of coastal defense RK-360MC "Neptune": command post control; three launch batteries, two universal launchers in each (6 USPU-360 and 24 ready to launch missiles); technical battery and support units. The technical battery includes 6 transport-loading and 6 transport vehicles (one special machine for each launcher). Given the TPK with P-360 missiles available on them, the total stock of missiles of one complex with three starting batteries is 72 anti-ship missiles. Thus, the complex is able to simultaneously launch up to 24 missiles on surface targets, the launch interval in a salvo is 3-5 seconds. After a volley, the complex may change its location. The declared deployment time of the complex at new positions does not exceed 15 minutes.

Currently, the Neptune complex is undergoing a factory test phase. In April and May of the 2019 of the year, in the Odessa region firing of anti-ship missiles P-360 from universal launchers USPU-360 was carried out. Tests are conducted at the state test site of the Armed Forces of Ukraine "Alibey." According to a press release from the state-owned company Ukroboronprom, in May a missile equipped with a homing head was tested. However, the test missile was generally equipped with a homing head, they doubt the specialized military blog bmpd, which is an informal publication published under the auspices of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. The bmpd blog believes that the launch of the rocket, as in April of the 2019 of the year, was carried out along a predetermined path without pointing the P-360 to a real surface target.

KrAZ trucks for Neptune


The Ukrainian side chose KrAZ trucks as the base for its missile system. At the exhibition in Kiev, the new USPU-360 launchers were demonstrated on the basis of the four-axle KrAZ 7634НЕ chassis with the wheel formula 8х8. As well as the RKP-360 mobile command post and the TZM-360 transport and loading vehicle, the base for which was the well-proven three-axle KrAZ 6322 with the 6x6 wheel arrangement. A distinctive feature of all the vehicles presented is the presence of an armored cockpit, for the development of which the specialists of the Ukrainian Armored Equipment enterprise were responsible. We are talking about armored cabs similar to those that are installed today on Ukrainian wheeled armored vehicles with mine protection SBA "Varta". Reservation of “Varta” provides the crew with protection against small arms fire - up to and including armor-piercing bullets of caliber 7,62x39 mm.



Of greatest interest is the new Ukrainian KrAZ-7634НE chassis. For the first time, this model was introduced only in January 2014 of the year. The car is a four-axle off-road vehicle of a cabless layout with a rather unusual scheme, in which the cab is located in front of the engine. Managed are the first and second axles of the car. The cross-country chassis can be used both in the civilian sector and for military purposes, as a carrier of various weapons systems. In addition to the use of the "Neptune" missile system, it is known about plans to use this off-road chassis as part of the Ukrainian Alder missile system under development. The mounting length of the frame, which is 8080 mm, and high load capacity (at the level of 27 tons) make it possible to install various types of modern weapons on the KrAZ-7634Н chassis.

Initially, it was planned to install the Yaroslavl 8-cylinder diesel engine YaMZ-7511.10 with a power of 400 hp, working with a clutch and gearbox also of Yaroslavl production. However, such a version is likely to remain as an option for cars shipped for export and civilian versions of the car, while the Ukrainian military will switch to cars with foreign engines. In the 2019 year, KrAZ already presented these cars with a more powerful new engine (460-strong) and an automatic gearbox. In particular, KrAZ previously installed Ford-Ecotorq 9.0L 360PS engines and Weichai Chinese engines on three-axle truck models.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    10 October 2019 18: 51
    The third day of continuous advertising of the Ukrainian defense industry. What is it for? what
    1. 0
      10 October 2019 19: 14
      Obviously, a Wentorg will open again soon.
    2. + 14
      10 October 2019 20: 21
      And there’s nobody else to write about in. Like on television, Ukrainians have a better time. Tired.
    3. xax
      +1
      11 October 2019 02: 10
      Quote: Amateur
      The third day of continuous advertising of the Ukrainian defense industry. What is it for?

      Black and white says:
      In the framework of the exhibition “Arms and Security 2019” held in Kiev
  2. + 13
    10 October 2019 19: 17
    These are the consequences of the "brotherhood of the military-industrial complex" of the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Back in the late 80s, I had to deal with the RK "Yakhont" systems at our post office in Chernigov. The Petersburgers from another post office handed over some of the documentation and stands. It was planned that we would co-create this complex. After the disappearance of the USSR, this business died down. But the Ukrainians scraped together the remains of the CD, converted it to a new base and something might work out. Only they will no longer be targeting NATO. am
    1. -3
      10 October 2019 19: 32
      Okay, you panic. This complex will give Ukraine nothing but costs.

      Russia is not going to attack Ukraine, and if it suddenly comes down, this complex will not help them, like everything else.

      Subsonic missiles of the "Neptune" complex are shot down by both ship and ground air defense systems, and they know this very well.

      In addition, I have not yet seen this complex hit the sea target. It is likely that the GOS for these missiles is not there yet.

      This complex is more of a political move by the Ukrainian authorities to justify themselves for a series of failures and defeats, especially in the Navy, and of supporting the myth that Ukraine is preparing to repel Russian aggression.

      It will be necessary, our VKS will clean the coast to a depth of 280 km easily and drop off both landing and equipment.

      But we do not have such a need, since we have a huge land border with Ukraine)).
      1. 0
        April 15 2022 16: 36
        How old is this...
      2. -3
        April 16 2022 14: 30
        I accidentally came across your opus from 2019. See how it all happened. You called the Neptune complex political, but in fact (most likely) it is a working, combat complex that won a major victory. And most likely Neptune already has a ballistic trajectory.
      3. 0
        April 10 2023 10: 11
        Yeah ...
        What is called - "leafing through an old iPad."
        And how beautiful everything looked, and the Aerospace Forces and the landing, and Ukraine is not even a state, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine is just a parody of the army. Yes, I thought the same myself.
        Meanwhile, the second year of the war with the "under-state" and "under-army" is underway. Failed to throw hats
    2. +5
      10 October 2019 22: 38
      at our post office in Chernigov to deal with the systems of the RK "Yakhont"

      Dear Sir, have you got anything mixed up? Kharkov was the contractor for Yakhont (Onyx) for NPO Mash, and St. Petersburg and Chernigov have nothing to do with it. laughing
    3. +2
      10 October 2019 23: 10
      Quote: xomaNN
      After leaving the Soviet Union in oblivion

      Just do not forget that Russia has announced its independence and lack of solidity FOR THE YEAR BEFORE Ukraine.
      1. +1
        11 October 2019 17: 02
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        Just do not forget that Russia has announced its independence and lack of solidity FOR THE YEAR BEFORE Ukraine.

        Actually, the text "Declaration of State Sovereignty of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic of June 12, 1990"the word" independence "does not contain.
        And the following is stated in this declaration:
        1. The Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic is a sovereign state created by the peoples historically united in it.

        5. To ensure political, economic and legal guarantees of the sovereignty of the RSFSR, the following shall be established:
        the full power of the RSFSR in resolving all issues of state and public life, with the exception of those that are voluntarily transferred to the jurisdiction of the USSR;
        the supremacy of the Constitution of the RSFSR and the Laws of the RSFSR throughout the territory of the RSFSR; the acts of the Union of the SSR, which conflict with the sovereign rights of the RSFSR, are suspended by the Republic on its territory. Disagreements between the Republic and the Union are resolved in the manner established by the Union Treaty;
        the exclusive right of the people to possess, use and dispose of the national wealth of Russia;
        plenipotentiary representation of the RSFSR in other union republics and foreign countries;
        the right of the Republic to participate in the exercise of the powers delegated by it to the USSR.

        6. The Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic unites with other republics in the Union on the basis of the Treaty. The RSFSR recognizes and respects the sovereign rights of the Union Republics and the USSR.

        7. The RSFSR reserves the right to freely withdraw from the USSR in the manner established by the Union Treaty and legislation based on it.

        And the above does not contradict the Constitution of the USSR:
        Article 76. The Union Republic is a sovereign Soviet socialist state, which merged with other Soviet republics into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

        Outside the limits specified in Article 73 of the Constitution of the USSR, the Union Republic independently exercises state power on its territory.

        The Union Republic has its own Constitution, which corresponds to the Constitution of the USSR and takes into account the peculiarities of the republic.
    4. KCA
      -3
      11 October 2019 01: 48
      In the USSR, Ukraine did almost nothing, besides the marching engines of the Kyrgyz Republic (and even not at all for all) and the Armed Forces of Ukraine, everything else was done at the plants of the Russian Federation, straight X-35 Ukrainian is a serious challenge to Bal, all Russian ships and boats hid
      1. KCA
        0
        12 October 2019 13: 02
        I live in the city where the X - 35 was developed at the Raduga State Design Bureau and was produced at the DMZ, but I know little, little, the outskirts were on hand, I was engaged in little things, perhaps they had and still have CD, but the presence of CD and the production of missiles is a little Different things
  3. +8
    10 October 2019 20: 01
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    Subsonic missiles of the "Neptune" complex are shot down by both ship and ground air defense systems, and they know this very well.

    Not only subsonic "Neptuns", but also subsonic "Harpoons", "Tomahawks", "Uranus" and "Calibers" are knocked down by the ship and ground PVO ...
    1. +3
      11 October 2019 00: 58
      Everything that flies is always confused about it and everyone needs to remember, and besides there is electronic warfare.
  4. +4
    10 October 2019 20: 45
    Complex without radar original :-))))
    1. +5
      10 October 2019 21: 19
      If the range is indeed 280 km, then the radar is not enough, there must be some external target designation, the radar is only up to 30-40 km, then the radio horizon
      1. -1
        10 October 2019 21: 35
        Come on 30-40 a "monolith-B" ?? https://topwar.ru/11820-monolit-b-beregovoy-kompleks-dlya-razvedki-vozdushnoy-i-nadvodnoy-obstanovki.html
        1. +8
          10 October 2019 21: 49
          I know only some exercises with firing using an over-the-horizon radar, and this was not a monolith, and the firing was a clear show off for the authorities.
          I’m silent about military use.
          If you give a link where you can read the details of firing at over-the-horizon radars in general and a monolith or mineral in particular, I would be grateful.
          So far, I'm skeptical.
          And in any case, Ukraine does not have a Monolith.
          1. 0
            11 October 2019 08: 23
            Well, Ukraine does not have a Monolith, but there is the same thing called Melchior, created on the basis of the ship's Mineral. Google - manufacturer Quantum Radar. In general, you need to understand that the developments of the times of the USSR are extremely similar for us and for them. So to mock and throw caps in such matters should be careful.
            1. 0
              11 October 2019 09: 41
              I didn’t throw any hats, on the contrary, I feel skepticism
  5. 0
    10 October 2019 21: 04
    Well done! Keep it up!
  6. 0
    10 October 2019 21: 41
    The main question for the rocket is how resistant the head is to modern interference.
    1. +2
      10 October 2019 21: 50
      Quote: Pavel57
      The main question for the rocket

      No, to those who bring it to its logical end! There are the same heads as ours .... maybe after 3 years both range and noise immunity and + from all carriers will be able to launch it ..... and you won’t get rid of the caps ((
  7. 0
    11 October 2019 01: 53
    Here is the Russian X-35 in the variant of coastal defense.
    Really like
  8. 0
    11 October 2019 03: 10
    Quote: Old26
    but also subsonic "Harpoons", "Tomahawks", "Uranus" and "Caliber" ...


    I never expected that the speed under Mach 2 on the final leg of the "Caliber" flight is "subsonic". Here "Tomahawks" are 100% subsonic.
  9. +3
    11 October 2019 13: 32
    Quote: lopvlad
    Quote: Old26
    but also subsonic "Harpoons", "Tomahawks", "Uranus" and "Caliber" ...


    I never expected that the speed under Mach 2 on the final leg of the "Caliber" flight is "subsonic". Here "Tomahawks" are 100% subsonic.

    Supersonic 2,9M (if you are "correct", then correct more precisely) - only on the last 20 km of the Caliber flight. Up to this very place he goes on subsonic. It is not yet known how much this modification has been tested and whether it is in service. But even if it consists - 20 km - this is a minuscule. She will be spotted and shot down before the separation of the combat stage takes place.
    1. +1
      12 October 2019 07: 47
      Therefore, the Americans and the Swedes came to the conclusion that it is better to reduce the radar signature of RCC. Then it can be made subsonic, with a decent range and powerful warhead, with a small mass (NSM and LRASM).
    2. 0
      12 October 2019 09: 04
      Notice and bring down? If the RCC goes at a height of several meters above the water, it is hidden by the horizon.
    3. 0
      2 December 2019 00: 12
      It will be hard to bring down.
      At an altitude of 5-10 m, the radio horizon is in every way no more than 30 km. This means the detection, missile defense, control system, search, capture, launch and flight to the target of the air defense will be only 30 seconds. Not enough!
      And after shooting a step and gaining speed, it will be even more difficult to hit it - pointing errors increase many times.
      Only AWACS to help, but against it there are many options.
      So, although the caliber is considered subsonic, it’s still a little thing.
  10. 0
    11 October 2019 17: 02
    2 years ago they wrote that Ukrainians There is nothing and nothing will work.
    Happened? Or not?
  11. +1
    12 October 2019 07: 37
    Compared with the latest versions of the "Harpoon" (225 kg warhead and 280 km range, with a mass of 740 kg) it looks weaker.
  12. +2
    12 October 2019 12: 01
    Quote: abc_alex
    Notice and bring down? If the RCC goes at a height of several meters above the water, it is hidden by the horizon.

    So what? For example, our Caliber rocket is flying over the water at a height of about 16 meters. Provided that the radar on the ship is at an altitude of at least 20 meters, the radio horizon will be about 40 km. The same subsonic "Caliber" will cover this distance in about 2-3 minutes. "Caliber" with a supersonic warhead - in about 1,5 minutes.
    If an AWACS aircraft is involved, at least the same "Hawkeye" E-2D, which has a cruising altitude of 10500 meters, then its radio horizon will be about 440 km ...
    If the service is carried out as it should, then the chances of breaking through a subsonic anti-ship missile are extremely slim ...
    The chances may be with a subsonic missile, launched, for example, from an aircraft located at a distance of fifty kilometers. Or with a supersonic one... With a subsonic one, they are extremely insignificant