The American media included the future B-21 among the worst bombers in the world

49
The US Air Force is the world's most powerful combat air fleet, writes Sohu, a Chinese publication. Even Russia and Israel cannot compare with them. The first place is associated with the economy and other factors, which leads to advantages in numbers. By the number of aircraft, the United States surpasses Great Britain, France, Germany, etc.





The US and Russia do have a “nuclear triad” and can strike. In the field of strategic bombers, the United States has specific views. Previously, they led to the appearance of the stealth aircraft B-2 Spirit, which was very different from the three types of Russian long-range bombers. Obviously, the success of a strategic bomber depends not only on flight performance and load. Such an aircraft will not be able to use nuclear or conventional weaponwhile enemy air defense radars or early warning aircraft can spot it. The "invisible" American B-2 has an advantage in this area.

Work on a new generation of American invisible bombers began in 2010. After ten years of different work, the new B-21 Raider is preparing for its future service. Recently, the Pentagon announced the start of assembly of the first B-21 aircraft. The ultra-modern bomber should take the US Air Force to a new level - it will be the basis of strategic aviation. An interesting fact: the Pentagon spokesman said that the new B-21 Raider will be cheaper than the current B-2 Spirit, but will receive advantages in invisibility in other areas.

According to the publication of the American magazine Business Insider, since the start of the B-21 Raider project, the Pentagon has carefully and carefully stored information about it. It is known that it will be similar to the current B-2. In essence, Spirit is being upgraded. B-2 had an extremely high price of 2 billion dollars, and the cost of operation is extremely high. For its storage, a special hangar with a climate system is required - if the conditions are not met, the radio-absorbing coating of the aircraft loses its properties.


The Pentagon plans to build for the US Air Force 100 B-21 aircraft, while B-2 are available in quantities less than 20 units. Because of such plans, the military faces public doubts and criticism from lawmakers.

B-21 Raider has already received a blow to reputation. Business Insider previously called the F-35 Lightning II fighter as one of the worst US aircraft. Now the B-21 bomber is on his list of worst vehicles. The reason is simple: the Pentagon keeps secret information about this aircraft, but, according to various estimates and rumors, it will be more expensive than planned. The same thing happened with the F-35. This car was created as a cheap "invisibility" in addition to the F-22 Raptor, but it is still too expensive.

Business Insider also appreciated the strange weaponry features of the B-21 bomber. According to the military, an invisible plane will be able to defend itself and for this will receive air-to-air missiles. The American magazine asks: if it is a bomber, then what remains to the fighters? The Pentagon is too brave to combine the functions of a long-range bomber and a fighter.

B-21 Raider is too expensive and has “useless” features. Of course, even before its appearance, such a machine was included in the list of worst US vehicles.
  • http://www.ifuun.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    8 October 2019 20: 21
    No wonder. Only the best minds to inflate financial bubbles continue to run to America.
    1. -2
      8 October 2019 21: 53
      That’s for sure, capital markets have already completely degraded.
      Just today in Germany, another American f-16 collapsed, and on the calendar it’s only Tuesday ... until Friday, even celebrate drinks with this event.
  2. -1
    8 October 2019 20: 28
    Well, basically. Mother Russia has a simple antidote. Tracking devices calmly tracks them and gives the command 31 Migam to take off. What Makar the thirty-first machine will shoot down Ryder?
    1. +3
      8 October 2019 20: 37
      At 31 cars the resource is not endless, but there is nothing to replace
      1. +4
        8 October 2019 20: 43
        Quote: urik62
        At 31 cars the resource is not endless, but there is nothing to replace

        I think PAK DP will appear very unexpectedly soon. The main technology of the three fly-type interceptor is and the technology of ultra-long weapons is being finalized.
        1. +1
          8 October 2019 21: 02
          Well, thank God!
      2. -5
        8 October 2019 21: 09
        Do we have more? Maybe enough urry .... I yell?
        1. +5
          8 October 2019 21: 28
          Quote: Observer2014
          Do we have more? Maybe enough urry .... I yell?

          What immediately Urya then, Sergey? hi Normal routine. When they were very behind, Sushi Dupa was on duty for 4 hours in pairs. Now we see further, the pilots immediately respond to the threat. It was once when the new Crimean divisions allowed up to 45 km of removal to the border. And it will fly. Are there daredevils now approaching closer than 75 km to the border?
          Not well allowed by all international laws. But! Excuse me. The Paramilitary Ochien has a full equipment. We fix the violation at 75 and around the bird
          1. +4
            9 October 2019 13: 15
            Quote: 29dest
            What will you shoot down? Wretched r-33? Know what the results of efficiency with guidance and highlighting radar? The MiG-31BM is now a boxer without panties. It does not have effective missiles to destroy explosive targets at such ranges.

            29dest (29dest), naive literate! RVV-BD R-37M with a range of 300 km - I forgot, and already KS-172 on the way with a range of 400 km. This is you without panties and brains, not Mig-31BM.
    2. -7
      8 October 2019 22: 06
      The comments are so striking. What will you shoot down? Wretched r-33? Know what the results of efficiency with guidance and highlighting radar? The MiG-31BM is now a boxer without panties. It does not have effective missiles to destroy explosive targets at such ranges.
      1. +6
        8 October 2019 22: 22
        Quote: 29dest
        The comments are so striking. What will you shoot down? Wretched r-33?

        Do you often see an unresponsive target in the IKO, at least 45 km from the border? Personally, I often see articles about "unprofessional" interception at a distance 75. Don't say that NATO pilots are cowards. I had the honor in 1990 to be on duty for 14 hours with three meals a day opposite the TR-1, where there is one flyer, in a diaper, against the entire Guards brigade with the MiG-29 and Su-27 regiments.
        So why are fly-ins closer than 75 removal so rare? Are rockets thin? You yourself believe what you said hi
        1. +1
          8 October 2019 22: 33
          I do not dispute at all, but this is not a database, but interception and escort at the borders or over neutral waters in peacetime. There Kaliningraders almost make selfies often. Like NATO. With the situevine 27e, they will no longer drive the "flies" away from the Shoigu plane, but will do business at maximum ranges
          1. +5
            8 October 2019 22: 51
            Quote: 29dest
            but this is not a database, but interception and escort at the borders or over neutral water in peacetime.

            And who primarily protects Peacetime? Simple combat duty on the VKS, and military campaigns of the Navy, which have constant contact with NATO. Strategists are already the northern polar fox. So to say control shot to the whole world.
            So for us this is a simple routine database. And somehow NATO does not dispute, but really wants to
            With the situevine 27e, they will no longer drive the "flies" away from the Shoigu plane, but will do business at maximum ranges

            Since the entih flies will not be driven away, we will ground the hedge when the flyers blink. Our pilots really save their asses. It is a fact hi
      2. SSR
        +2
        9 October 2019 06: 12
        Quote: 29dest
        The MiG-31BM is now a boxer without panties. He has no effective missiles to hit targets

        Ah ha ha !!! laughing
        Comrade, be careful with allegories!
        In your opinion, it turns out who has the most beautiful cowards and is stronger! lol
        A boxer and without panties creeps into a goofback in his underwear.
        hi
      3. The comment was deleted.
  3. +16
    8 October 2019 20: 28
    "Trust in God, but do not make a mistake yourself" - says a wise proverb.
    Do not rely on the fact that the Americans will make a bad bomber. You need to make your own good.
  4. -1
    8 October 2019 20: 30
    B-2 was extremely high price of $ 2 billion

    So that's its main advantage! Those. the more expensive the equipment, the more you cannot "knock it down" ?!
    Brilliant!
    The Pentagon keeps secret information about this aircraft, but, according to various estimates and rumors, it will be more expensive than planned.

    And that means more powerful, higher, further, bigger, more inconspicuous ... shorter than the sumermegapuperfundervaflya!
    1. +1
      8 October 2019 20: 36
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      Those. the more expensive the equipment, the more you cannot "knock it down" ?!
      Brilliant!

      There is still a principle. Away from the Russian borders and no one to shoot down
  5. +6
    8 October 2019 20: 40
    B-21 Raider is too expensive and has “useless” features. Of course, even before its appearance, such a machine was included in the list of worst US vehicles.


    Not born, but already bad, someone is fighting with someone ...
    1. 0
      8 October 2019 20: 51
      Quote: cniza
      Not born, but already bad

      Technology Vitya hi Russian and Chinese technologies are prescribed to such poor before birth bully
      For others, it’s a very powerful pepelats. It will turn any other country into ashes
  6. +2
    8 October 2019 20: 49
    Ah, the worst of being dear?
    Then Harrier seems to be in the best laughing
    It goes for 25-30 million new and 1.5 million apiece used.
    The Pentagon can buy thousands of them instead of the expensive R-21s.
    1. -1
      8 October 2019 20: 59
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It goes for 25-30 million new and 1.5 million apiece used.

      Good pepelats for the Falkland War, better than Our YAK - 38
      1. 0
        10 October 2019 11: 44
        on the Falklands, the British were very lucky that their Argentina did not roll out.
        Harrier is not a bad plane for his year of creation, but still too weak.
    2. 0
      10 October 2019 11: 32
      jokes as jokes, but even for Americans with their bottomless budget, the price of new planes is a little dumb, which will inevitably affect the number of really combat-ready cars.
      1. 0
        10 October 2019 11: 40
        Everything is relative.
        The price of the F-35 was lower than that of Typhoon or Rafal.
        On the F-35, there is a turn for 15 years ahead for hundreds of aircraft, and Typhoons and Rafali can hardly sell small quantities of 20 each.
  7. +1
    8 October 2019 20: 58
    the idea of ​​making an airplane full of all all all all is generally logical with an abundance of all kinds of missiles, it confuses only the ability of all kinds of all to carry out all all all
    1. SSR
      +1
      9 October 2019 06: 22
      Quote: poquello
      the idea of ​​making an airplane full of all all all all is generally logical with an abundance of all kinds of missiles, it confuses only the ability of all kinds of all to carry out all all all

      Well, yes, it looks logical in the sense that electronic components, all kinds of high-pressure hoses for cables, composites, engines, while maintaining the dimensions, can reduce the weight of the aircraft - why not try to shove something updated there because even the Tu-95 has protection.
      1. -2
        9 October 2019 20: 59
        Quote from S.S.R.
        Quote: poquello
        the idea of ​​making an airplane full of all all all all is generally logical with an abundance of all kinds of missiles, it confuses only the ability of all kinds of all to carry out all all all

        Well, yes, it looks logical in the sense that electronic components, all kinds of high-pressure hoses for cables, composites, engines, while maintaining the dimensions, can reduce the weight of the aircraft - why not try to shove something updated there because even the Tu-95 has protection.

        Naturally, even tactical stealth buns are possible when a bomber drops a long-range missile and immediately changes course, and the rocket engine does not turn on immediately, but even with the Americans, then the anti-torpedoes do not counter-torpedo, then the anti-missiles do not anti-missile, it’s too arrogant to rely on paper long distances, and in short this chicken coop is not a tenant
  8. +3
    8 October 2019 20: 58
    They themselves do not know what he is. Fly - they will find out. There was a story with f22 too: the first published data were very good even for today. After 15 years, the data were clarified and it turned out to be much worse. Capitalism - the doctor is interested in making the patient sick.
  9. 0
    8 October 2019 21: 16
    It’s unpleasant when they shoved you into the "King of the Hill" and you sculpt at the foot of the mountain and others climb the hill along you ... to come up with so that wallowing in a ditch does not seem so shameful ...
  10. -1
    8 October 2019 21: 20
    That's why my military-industrial complex is prettier to me ... no one announces anything and does not rush with loud presentations. At first they will do then show. Without pathos and cries. Already there is already working and farts American sets fire ... respect
    1. 0
      8 October 2019 21: 29
      Cartoons about non-existent weapons? No, I haven’t.
      1. +1
        9 October 2019 02: 34
        Better cartoons, from which the mattress changes diapers together with you at 4pcs per hour, than a "documentary" about a penguin (if you don't kick it, it won't fly), an iron (it's dumb for him alone, just by the handle with tugs), a patriot (wow, and then what did it fly?), etc.
    2. -1
      8 October 2019 21: 37
      Quote: Azazelo
      At first they will do then show. Without pathos and cries.

      Well still smoker, American intelligence. Our buns are the first to tell us. Otherwise, the military-industrial complex would not have shown more than half of the brand new Goodies
    3. -6
      9 October 2019 02: 39
      And what about the regular statements of various officials and the president himself about "having no analogue in the world" about every second wunderwolf, which is only in the process of testing, not put into service, and even more so not participating in the database ?!
  11. +1
    8 October 2019 21: 51
    As I understand it, at VO someone learned Chinese using the "express method of Ilona Davydova" laughing
    In general, the Chinese again talk about what they do not know. By the way, as far as I remember, the P-60 was planned for self-defense at the Tu-160.
  12. +1
    8 October 2019 22: 03
    The main direction is the desire of the USA, which is being seen today, to create almost completely protected combat vehicles, invisible, inaudible, sitting in which, almost in complete safety, they could crush any enemy. However, this is not possible in principle, any combat unit falling into the combat zone becomes vulnerable, and whether it will perform the combat mission or not depends primarily on the person managing it, how smart he is trained and cold-blooded in the most dangerous situation, only this gives him a chance, after completing the task, to leave the battle alive. If the commander exclude
    1. +1
      8 October 2019 22: 07
      If the commander reliably hopes for armor and high quality equipment, he and the crew entrusted to him are doomed to defeat, which is a striking example of the military of Saudi Arabia.
  13. -5
    8 October 2019 22: 18
    The MiG-31 in the near future does not anticipate explosive missiles with active guidance at least close in range to the r-33. A dagger with a niche in the CF is more from poverty than to efficiency
    1. +2
      8 October 2019 22: 33
      Quote: 29dest
      The MiG-31 in the near future does not anticipate active missiles BB

      Miga-31 has the highest speed of all operating. Weapons are different and you can’t fasten the Su-30. It works differently. Tell me, did you fly a MiG-31? Missiles launched at the training grounds? Why such pessimism?
      1. -2
        8 October 2019 22: 44
        30ki has a hint at least on the rvv-ae, which, however, is not far from p77. The second question is not about salary. Look at BM at least in Kansk. Do they often carry at least a layout
        1. -2
          8 October 2019 22: 45
          P-60 and P-73 are not taken into account for obvious reasons
        2. 0
          8 October 2019 23: 04
          Quote: 29dest
          30ki has a hint at least on rvv-ae

          I repeat. You are looking at the armament of the Su-30. The armament of the Mig-31 is a top secret and you can’t screw it on a finger click on the T-10 (Flanker). A flashlight can launch and accompany a rocket for a certain time. I say, Mach 3 is a very big opportunity. It’s not for nothing that they call him special forces of air defense
          1. -2
            8 October 2019 23: 19
            Quote: Tusv
            Quote: 29dest
            30ki has a hint at least on rvv-ae

            I repeat. You are looking at the armament of the Su-30. The armament of the Mig-31 is a top secret and you can’t screw it on a finger click on the T-10 (Flanker). A flashlight can launch and accompany a rocket for a certain time. I say, Mach 3 is a very big opportunity. It’s not for nothing that they call him special forces of air defense

            What is the top secret in the armament of the MiG-31BM? Accompanying the rocket (and which one?) Can "not only everyone." 3 max speed under what conditions? MiG-25PD is even faster, but nevertheless he was "fired". Speed ​​doesn't mean invincibility. For the first time I hear about "special forces" air defense)
            Missiles, of course, can’t be screwed; in the same OMS, like heaven and earth.
            1. -2
              8 October 2019 23: 32
              Quote: 29dest
              For the first time I hear about "spetsnaz" air defense)

              You have some superficial ideas.
              Fought against Miga-31? Once the scan is two and no. Gone Where will it come from again? Well think. Guess hi
              Well, it’s easier to land it with a dagger. But He is not alone, but will come with a blacksmith. Why is NATO a blacksmith?
              Here we come to the formula. The Russian threat does not bomb itself with crap bombs
  14. +2
    8 October 2019 23: 43
    S-500 is on its way, just in time for the appearance of the raider put into service
    1. -5
      8 October 2019 23: 53
      S-500 is not an air defense system, but a missile defense system. Long-range missile against BR and
      low-flying satellites.
      An ordinary S-400 should deal with aircraft.
      1. -1
        9 October 2019 01: 59
        Quote: voyaka uh
        An ordinary S-400 should deal with aircraft.

        Fig figs ordinary. The Chinese on the export version banged their BR at a distance of 270 and said this ears. Himself in shock. Not well, two hundred and fifty and the aerodynamic is already too much for export. And here recourse
      2. +1
        9 October 2019 06: 01
        Why? The same 40N6M from the S-500 aerodynamics works. So let him bring down the enemy letaks on distant approaches.
  15. 0
    9 October 2019 05: 50
    It is strange that they were not included in the list of the best. laughing
    I don’t know what the Americans will succeed in doing, but to attach air-to-air missiles to a strategic bomb seems a rather dubious idea. A radar for them to rummage through the sky? Well then, what kind of invisibility is it? Glowing over the horizon will be. In optics suggest? Well then, what kind of strategist is it if you climbed into the air defense zone?
  16. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"