For the first time, the operation of the Palantin-K complex to counter UAVs is shown.

Armed with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the spring of this year, the Palantin-K electronic warfare complex was first shown in action. We are talking about the presented episode of the exercises at the Luga training ground in the Leningrad Region.




TV channel "Star" publishes footage with the use of "Palantina-K" by troops of the electronic warfare of the Guards Combined Arms Army of the Western Military District.

The complex was used to counter the drones of a conditional enemy.

The images show how a serviceman acting as the operator of an “enemy” drone equipped with an explosive device launches an UAV into the air.

Next, the work of calculating the Palantin-K complex is demonstrated. Radio-electronic systems of the complex detect the object and go to the control channel of the device. Information is displayed on the monitor of the operator on duty. The goal is set - the flight is carried out from the southwest. This information is reported by the operator after detecting the signal.

The video demonstrates the deployment of the Palantin-K electronic warfare system.

At the end of the video, the unit commander is shown with the rank of captain, who sets the task of suppressing the control channels of the “quadrocopter” target.



The use of the UAV counteraction complex was recognized as successful.

"Palantine" is, in fact, the integration of several electronic warfare systems. It allows you to suppress various enemy signals, including cellular signals. Automation of the complex allows you to choose the most optimal version of electronic countermeasures, which reduces the risk of human error.
Photos used:
frame from the movie "Star"
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Valery Valery 8 October 2019 06: 35 New
    • 6
    • 12
    -6
    We are ahead in the electronic warfare for the land component of the Armed Forces, the situation is about the same in the Navy, but the electronic warfare in the aerospace forces is lame, we are lagging behind both qualitatively and quantitatively. The VKS commander needs to think about this.
    1. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 31 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Why are we lagging behind? Give examples
      1. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 30 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Gentlemen accepted to take a word
      2. Valery Valery 8 October 2019 21: 29 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        EA-18 Growler
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Chaldon48 8 October 2019 17: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is sad, because it is the aircraft that is most sensitive to electronic warfare.
  2. Hammer 8 October 2019 06: 36 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Different complexes are important, different complexes are needed. The main thing is that the effect of them would be. wink
  3. rocket757 8 October 2019 06: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It's time to include this "sport" in the list of Olympic!
    There are more and more participants, the variety of equipment is growing !!!
    "Medals" are already giving out / awarding, quietly! And in public, advertising and contracts, respectively.
    Denushka is not small there concentrated.
  4. Mountain shooter 8 October 2019 06: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems that any "kamikaze drones" will be worth the haste. The system is fast. Well, right, the weak point of these devices is the control channels. And autonomous robots, self-managing - much more expensive!
    1. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 30 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Not more expensive. With an electronic inertial autonomous guidance system they are the same in price, only in accuracy much worse than GPS or with manual external guidance. A camera and a transmitting image are more expensive than a GPS module or electronic accelerometers.
  5. 3vs
    3vs 8 October 2019 06: 59 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    Well, where is the real work of the complex?
    An empty video, about anything!
    1. keeper03 8 October 2019 07: 17 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      The rest is vulture! yes soldier
      1. 3vs
        3vs 8 October 2019 07: 20 New
        • 11
        • 1
        +10
        What for then generally post such videos!
        Now, if they showed what’s going on with the drone’s operator when the Palantin-K is running,
        what visually happens to the drone itself, then it would be interesting.
      2. Angrybeard 8 October 2019 09: 22 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        'We have such devices,
        But we won’t tell you about them ")

        In general, in security systems, security by obscurity is considered the least secure implementation method. But the military has its own ... the main thing is that behind the veil of secrecy they do not hide significant shortcomings.
  6. Observer2014 8 October 2019 07: 17 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Judging by the size of this complex, what can it do except with one quadrocopter? Can a swarm of such machines stop? An attack of 200-300 pieces at the same time on the airfield for example? What is its range? Nothing is clear from the video. Well, apart from the fact that the complex is really impressive in size. As by modern standards ..
    1. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 32 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      The boss is all gone (c) If it is typical for the antennas to work in the corners of commercials of 360 degrees if it is a radio channel.
  7. Thrifty 8 October 2019 07: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yeah, that’s what I saw in motion, only the tented good
  8. Avior 8 October 2019 07: 33 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    It’s good that the “terrorist” turned out to be inept, did not guess to set the function of flight by points.
    And then suppress the control channels even until blue in the face, this will not hurt the automatic flight mode.
    The problem factor of drones will increase every year - they are becoming more accessible to a wide range and more perfect. What is now being sold to children is only a few years ago and the military was not available.
    Unfortunately, not all terrorists are short-sighted, poorly educated fanatics, there are those who will guess how to use it.
    The modern quadroopter is quite capable of covering several kilometers and reaching a point without control and satellite navigation, using a compass and a flight stabilization system.
    New devices are needed to deal with such threats ....
    1. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      To combat such threats, we must first of all fight against the fact that smart, literate people do not become social outcasts and do not follow the path of terrorism.
      1. Avior 8 October 2019 08: 29 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Who would know such a recipe ....
        1. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 33 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Building a socially fair society. There is a recipe, only real bandits and human greed spoil and pervert it
          1. Avior 8 October 2019 08: 38 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Very often, religious fanatics are at the heart of terrorism. And sometimes it’s not at all poor
            1. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 52 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              This is what the media inspire. It is always based on geopolitical interests and money. But the performers most often become fools fanatics.
            2. Oyo Sarkazmi 8 October 2019 13: 29 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Avior
              Very often, religious fanatics are at the heart of terrorism.

              Losing propaganda. If after each terrorist attack, the hype would rise, “Shaitan dogs killed dozens of righteous Muslims !!!” - And this was repeated 50 times a year, in many countries, in any languages ​​- supporters of terrorism would quickly diminish.
              Why did the British in BV calmly keep terrorists in check from 1920 to 1950? They collected the remains of the “martyr”, and solemnly, with honor, buried them ... sewn into pork skin.
    2. Lopatov 8 October 2019 09: 23 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Avior
      It’s good that the “terrorist” turned out to be inept, did not guess to set the function of flight by points.

      Cool. Well, he flies "point by point", but what is the point in such flights? While it lands, while it is found because of a muffled signal from satellites, the situation may change a hundred times.

      Do not forget, the main function of such a device is real-time intelligence.
      1. Avior 8 October 2019 09: 29 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        It was about terrorism, there was something with a blue electrical tape taped.
        For a modern drone, navigation is not necessary, just a compass and an inertial control system.
        Actually, now there is no big problem to make three control systems - by compass and altimeter, by satellite navigation and inertial.
        Do not drown all at once.
        Intelligence can also be at points along the line of contact, for example, or along a route, or combined with a point of interest.
        1. Lopatov 8 October 2019 09: 31 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Avior
          It was about terrorism, there was something with a blue electrical tape taped.
          For a modern drone, navigation is not necessary, just a compass and an inertial control system.

          Or the road will turn out and the manufacturer can be found at a time, or very large, or no accuracy, plus or minus a couple of hundred meters.
          Everything has a price.
          1. Avior 8 October 2019 09: 36 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            In ordinary children's toys, accuracy has long been higher
            1. Lopatov 8 October 2019 09: 43 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: Avior
              In ordinary children's toys, accuracy has long been higher

              When flying at a distance of no more than a hundred meters, maybe. Otherwise, constant correction according to global positioning data is required.
    3. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 34 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      your fantasies are inappropriate, from the area there is a rocket at 1 2 3 4 5 and 10 and 12 thousand km, the answer is right away! but not at 6 and 11))))
  9. Potato 8 October 2019 08: 01 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Here again ... When will our industry begin to make quadrocopters themselves for domestic use? Why is progress at the head of the progress only Chinese divisions, and we can only buy them? Where are the successes and achievements of our industry?

    The same applies to any other modern household gadgets - from the phone to the hoverboard. Here our industry is at zero compared to competitors ...

    Maybe the divisions from the Russian Defense Ministry are just as uncompetitive and stupid, by analogy with everything else? Just forced to produce and buy your own.
    1. MrFox 8 October 2019 09: 03 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      There is no point in buying. Look what is the procedure for obtaining permission for a UAV, this is not for the faint of heart

      1. Avior 8 October 2019 09: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I think this stupidity will sooner or later be canceled.
        To assemble such a quadroper is now capable not only of a student, but of an advanced student.
      2. Dikson 8 October 2019 09: 41 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Maybe this will work in the capital .. bans, fines and notifications .. a The country is huge. Who with a quadcopter in the taiga, on the river or in the mountains will fine me? Who should I notify there? Initially, the drone helps tourists and rescuers to get previously inaccessible photographs from a bird's eye view of various beautiful places .. hard-to-reach places .. It gives you the opportunity to get a video, which 10 years ago was inaccessible to ordinary people .. Then went children's toys, racing models, competitions .. Then terrorists became interested in quadrocopters, and, finally, the military .. The ban on the use of goods that stores are filled with .. this is so Soviet .. Why is this all the scribble on the diagram ??? Who will observe it? Already there are cracking programs for quadrocopters that bypass the ban on flying in closed areas of airports .. Forbidding you will not stop people .. I had to fly a quadric near the airport abroad. Yes, closed area. Yes, it does not fly. freezes and sits in 10 seconds. But! Registered DIRECTLY IN THE APPLICATION, agreed with the requirements and responsibility, entered his data, and fly to your health .. In the Yellow Zone .. Not in Krasnaya, where the runway and the airport are directly .. And do not call anyone ..
      3. dmmyak40 8 October 2019 09: 55 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        At first glance - nonsense. But knowing the slovenliness of our people ... maybe the threat of punishment and complicated regulations will somehow save us from the state of emergency. Here, small aviation constantly snoops around without working with ATS.
      4. cormorant 8 October 2019 10: 11 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, we can say the market of domestic, consumer UAVs is completely destroyed. With such horse restrictions, it makes no sense to produce them in Russia. Really it was impossible to simply limit the area of ​​application. Lawmakers, you at least sometimes look at the map in which vast country you live. I got permission for hell if I run it in the taiga or in the steppe.
      5. kventinasd 8 October 2019 12: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: MrFox
        There is no point in buying. Look what is the procedure for obtaining permission for a UAV, this is not for the faint of heart

        Bullshit is all that. Owners of drones both flew and fly. The law has not yet been worked out; on state services, the registration of drones will be introduced only after 120 days from the day the decision was entered in, and no one is going to notify the aviation department in writing about registering the drone. Google forums.
    2. fruit_cake 8 October 2019 11: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What is our industry? it’s all in private hands, they want to do it and take it, set up production, we have capitalism
    3. kventinasd 8 October 2019 12: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Potato
      Here again ... When will our industry begin to make quadrocopters themselves for domestic use?

      Never! Consumer microelectronics in our country was buried back in the dashing 90s and unfortunately for a long time, but unfortunately there is no strength or means to create something from scratch. The same applies to the auto industry. It’s easier to buy a finished product from those who can do.
  10. Avior 8 October 2019 09: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    No, more likely for kilometers, and at the same time in calm weather, with the help of a built-in compass and stabilization system with accelerometers and gyroscopes, you can achieve high enough accuracy, acceptable for a terrorist attack against a tank farm, for example.
    1. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      in this sense, it’s still a matter of people and not technology to throw mono and from a catapult from the bushes. biological weapons have been used for thousands of years, as well as chemical and volts massively and of course, and of course, having the whole bouquet themselves. Yes, and leather bags tend to either not have the desire or not be able to, and that's right, without exceptions, Wh for tens of billions (for centuries that is).
    2. Evil Booth 11 October 2019 17: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      trash and waste, but what about the flights NURS MLRS tens of kilometers dozens of years ago ....
  11. Shuttle 8 October 2019 11: 00 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    After the words "suppress all active channels" - even the video stopped. recourse

    In general, a cool piece of iron. But in my opinion a little too big. Indeed, to counter such a kid from a suitcase, a smaller appliance might have been enough.
    On the other hand, who said that Palantine is only against quadrics? ...
  12. Elephant 8 October 2019 11: 02 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    In the Donbass, such systems are very necessary, because banderlogs are already completely overgrown.
  13. MrFox 8 October 2019 11: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Modern drones already have an anti-sniper function, it will soon come to a complete imitation of biology - the flight of a fly. Try to aim.
    There is nothing to think of with such a slow antenna.
    The first third of the video is interesting, here it is the future, how is this supposed to be fought?
  14. kventinasd 8 October 2019 12: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeop down oooooochen!
    With such a speed of deployment, the drone will calmly fly where it is needed, discard or take a picture of what is needed and will return safely home.
  15. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 50 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    In fact, ZERO aircraft are now being produced during the war, and all of them are combat-ready and focused on the theater of war, here and now there are about a couple of hundred (maximum) out of a total of 1000 and this is the Russian Air Force or China (well, there may be 300-400 current far far away not everywhere). What are they doing? they carry bombs weighing 0,5 tons, while at the same range, at the same height and the same speed (flight and not maximum), the actual plywood-wood-fabric planes of the Great Patriotic War fly (among them there are a lot of technical or with a range greater than that of f25 / 35 combat limit radius with micro ammunition). So the boys .... knocking down a stick from 18-70 km will be "a little" expensive with a modern rocket from a modern airplane or an air defense of the same range, well, it can’t cost 140 kg of SAMs like 700 kg of boards suitable for use in an airplane, and a jet engine with with an extreme speed of 700m as an internal combustion engine with a limit of 2 M and a mass thrust ten times lower, however, both carriers will pull as much as two half-tones, by the way, the radar f0,4 is clearly not cheaper than UAV control equipment weighing a ton or less and it’s enough to steer wooden ailerons fabric airplane in which metal in motor and frame and all. Aluminum "grams." What is typical for producing the then machines in the hundreds of days is like then only a small fraction of the capacity of the industry, and this, by the way, is more than the reserves and the rate of production of on-range missiles. Naturally, suppressing electronic warfare with a laser control channel 16+ km away is not easy, but just putting one of the many unkillable as well as Himalayan su100 cards into the UAV will transfer 57 pieces of hunters / by-57 / pe 2 command to reach the discharge point (carousel one by one as it was in the attacks of attack aircraft, including helicopters and tanks), and then the bombs at the same time did not change their plan to their 2 km (they would fly to 70 but then give the unsuppressed JPS a high flight speed and the height is no longer 140 but the sun e 8+ km), withdrawal tanks do not need 14 current ZPUs and on those that have andromeda (receiving any information via t-12,7) a hundred-kilogram air gun with a small ammunition to balance light UAVs or dropping bombs going quadrotognezdovye to the industrial area according to the described scheme or the group of troops that was most riddled with tunguska heels with silks. and again, old carriers can drag new bombs and knock down carriers at timely ranges is categorically more expensive than the satire carrier, the more you get it WITHOUT a bomb, not bothering with a small ESR plywood machine with a small motor, which is always a hundred times smaller than the body sizes. And another nuance, I was told by the RF Ministry of Defense that we’ll handle the garbage, even with an official letter. Well, OK.
    1. Evil Booth 8 October 2019 13: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Otite take away a great beautiful article on this site?
  16. Mentat 8 October 2019 14: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Avior
    It was about terrorism, there was something with a blue electrical tape taped.
    For a modern drone, navigation is not necessary, just a compass and an inertial control system.
    Actually, now there is no big problem to make three control systems - by compass and altimeter, by satellite navigation and inertial.
    Do not drown all at once.
    Intelligence can also be at points along the line of contact, for example, or along a route, or combined with a point of interest.

    To do this, there are other systems that work on the principle of EMP. Their darkness is already.
  17. Mentat 8 October 2019 14: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: MrFox
    Modern drones already have an anti-sniper function, it will soon come to a complete imitation of biology - the flight of a fly. Try to aim.
    There is nothing to think of with such a slow antenna.
    The first third of the video is interesting, here it is the future, how is this supposed to be fought?

    Automated laser and EMR emitters. For small aircraft, a lot of power is not needed.
    1. MrFox 8 October 2019 15: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Again: laser and EMP emitters operate with a sharply focused beam. Aiming at an actively maneuvering small target is practically impossible
      1. Evil Booth 10 October 2019 13: 51 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I’ll tell you a damn about the oval of defeat on aircraft with a caliber of 107-128mm about 400 by 700 meters for a caliber 76 for small size oval such that it will take into account the projectile speed of 1 km and the UAV 0,083 km or less a couple of times .... ALWAYS in a radius of 1-3 km and so on ... KS-19 is not s-7 but it burns above all sorts of f16 with a micronload of 57-2 hundred, they are stored in the Assad 23-4 actvino and were widely used in 888, so not everything is as simple as you think. all the more so if the projectile sausage detonates from the burst of shell of the tunguska, there will be at least a kilometer if the shells detonate by the radio signal.
  18. Maxim Tkachev 8 October 2019 15: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is certainly wonderful that we have such complexes ... But how to deal with this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njW1KyaiI80 watch from 01:40 to 04:30. I was impressed
  19. Kaw
    Kaw 8 October 2019 16: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    On three eight-axle KaAZ trucks! Do the Americans have a similar complex, like it is located on Hamer, or do they have a different range of action?
  20. Valery Valery 8 October 2019 21: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Potato
    Why are we lagging behind? Give examples

    EA-18 Growler
    1. Evil Booth 10 October 2019 13: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Su24P)))
      Quote: Valery Valery
      EA-18 Growler
      1. Valery Valery 10 October 2019 15: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        To invent why ?!
        1. Evil Booth 10 October 2019 16: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          well ok c300 farther than
          1. Valery Valery 10 October 2019 16: 58 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Alas, the S-300 is not a panacea. That's why the growler (armed with active and passive jammers and Harm type anti-radar missiles) so that air defense systems could not hit air targets.
            Really - Growler (formerly Proler) was a unique electronic warfare aircraft and four of these aircraft can cover the attack of 90-100 aircraft in one hit and minimize losses by 1-5%.
            1. Evil Booth 11 October 2019 17: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I’ll even tell you more about what you don’t have in botomethods, f117 is more stealth than f22 and not just 1 but 0,5 (growler) and 89-101 the plane will be able to suppress not 1 but even 2 c333 I’ll just lie because I won’t. drinks
              1. Valery Valery 11 October 2019 23: 14 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I did not understand a word! ....
  21. Dikson 9 October 2019 09: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yeah ... While you are going to deploy this dysentery on three machines in working condition - kamikaze drones will already smash everything to smithereens ...
    1. Evil Booth 12 October 2019 09: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      wassat suddenly the subject will be deployed BEFORE the attack