Absolute Evil Towards a Bright Future

For twenty-eight years there has been no Soviet Union, a country in which many of the living people were born, took a solemn oath, joining the Komsomol, the CPSU, and the ranks of the armed forces. There is no longer the world pole of socialism, the core of which was the USSR. A new reality has come, about which I would like to speak.




New reality


On September 19 of 2019 of the year, the European Parliament (535 of votes in favor, 66 of votes against and 52 abstained) adopted a resolution on the importance of European memory for the future of Europe.

What turned out to be important for Europe in its memory? This was eloquently stated in the resolution of the European Parliament, blaming the outbreak of World War II on fascist Germany and the Soviet Union. Europe has such a memory now, such a "independent" policy from the USA ...

The present cannot be understood without the past; you have to look back at historyas the last president of the Soviet Union used to say, who is who.

A look into the past


You will have to start from afar, mentioning the XV-XVI centuries, when capitalism was born in Holland and England, becoming the starting point of competition for leadership in the new social system. Roman politician Marcus Thulius Cicero said: "Money is the driving force of any war." In the emerging capitalism, money has become a driving force on a much larger scale. The basis of enrichment is minimum costs and maximum profit. The meaning of enrichment is influence and power.

It is no coincidence that the rapid development of capitalism began in countries actively exploiting the colonies, the leader among which was England. Capitalism began to quickly turn into a global social system, the core of consumption of which was the metropolis, and the periphery and colonies became the largest object of exploitation. Ultimately, this scheme was to give rise to the world leader of the system, and all the rest be attributed to the host colonies. The struggle for leadership gave birth to applicants who are able to challenge the rapidly growing rich UK.

With the first serious contender, Napoleonic France, England dealt in many respects with the hands of Austria, Prussia and Russia. With the second, who seriously dared to challenge the dominion of the English crown, Kaiser Germany, the issue was solved with the help of the Entente, Russia was again involved in this alliance, and after all almost all the Russian tsarina were German, and the emperors were mostly half-blood Germans. It seemed that we had to share with the Germans, why again harness ourselves to England, when it was eternal for Russia that the "English woman was shitting"? But money solved a lot, with their help it was possible to successfully rake in the heat with the wrong hands, to bribe, to plant on a loan interest, making huge profits on it, gaining world influence. In this, the treacherous Anglo-Saxons turned out to be unsurpassed virtuosos. As a result, Kaiser Germany did not just fall, but lost its colonies, fell under the restrictions of Versailles, having received sharp restrictions and bans on weapons and, in general, on the army and navy.

As a result of the First World War in Europe, one super empire remained - the British. In addition to the German one, the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires fell into the flames of the First World War and sunk into oblivion.

The only owner of the system, the British crown, has matured on the planet, and their overseas “miscarriage” - the North American United States, in which large capital found loopholes inaccessible to Europe. In the United States, at the dawn of their "democracy", there was a slave trade, indigenous genocide, gangster laws of the Wild West. In the United States, almost everything was possible, for the sake of money, for the sake of gigantic profits.

The Fifth Republic, France, could no longer compete with the Anglo-Saxons, like other developed European countries.

In Europe and in the world as a whole, it turned out to be the only force that poses a threat to world capitalism. This is a young Soviet country - the USSR, with a social system independent of the West, its human morality, its own politics, its own idea.

Only power


After the abdication of Nicholas II in February 1917 of the year with the monarchists, liberals, other “right” and “left”, it was the Communists who were able to save Russia by creating the USSR and not allowing the collapse of the country. Moreover, they were able to eliminate illiteracy, carry out industrialization, and build a powerful country by the 30 years of the last century. The Soviet Union became a threat to world capitalism, and the West had to solve this problem.

The Anglo-Saxons learned to fight with the wrong hands, make money. To this end, they began to actively make anti-USSR from Germany defeated and bound by restrictions, and from Nazism - the antipode of communism. So Hitler appeared, so the Third Reich appeared.

It should be emphasized here that without the connivance of the same England and the USA, who played the main violin, the formation of the Third Reich from the defeated and bound by the restrictions of Versailles Germany in principle would have been impossible.

It should also be emphasized that the leaders of world capitalism did not need a strong and united Russia in any form, both with the monarchy, in the form of an empire (which the West itself actually destroyed in February 1917 of the year), and with any other power under which Russia would remain strong. If after the collapse of the USSR, the new liberal power went to the cosmic and nuclear superpower, with the most educated population, then Kerensky and his ilk were a completely different Russia. After the First World War, with tsarist debt on loans, with full technological dependence on the West, low education of the population to the complete illiteracy of many of the lower strata.

Would such a Russia become a superpower with pro-Western Chubais and Yeltsins already in 1917? Unlikely. It is unlikely that Russia would have been able to maintain the integrity with the active intervention of the West in governing the country. What happened after the 1991 year is evidence of this. Only the Soviet margin of safety saved the country, hurt from a superpower that tsarist Russia did not have. In addition, the monarchists and liberals could have unleashed a civil war, the rebellion of General Kornilov is an example of this.

This can not and does not want to understand how home-grown monarchists, accusing the Communists of all mortal sins, of the "collapse" of Russia, and, by and large, the current European Parliament (see above).

If the Communists were to blame for anything, it was only because the Anglo-Saxons' hopes for world hegemony did not materialize that after the First World War they had to create a continuation, the "second act" of the world massacre. The Soviet Union developed rapidly, turning into a powerful, self-sufficient power, into a new, independent and dangerous pole of power for world capitalism.

But let us return to the events of 1938 of the year when the Second World War had not yet begun and as if it should not have begun.

“I brought you peace!”


“I brought you peace!” British Prime Minister Chamberlain said in 1938, waving a piece of paper in front of the public with a promise from Hitler not to start a war with Britain.

Chamberlain then returned from the Munich Conference, where he and Daladier fed Hitler Czechoslovakia, even earlier Britain closed her eyes to the Anschluss, according to which Austria entered the Third Reich. Eyes were closed to all violations of Versailles restrictions, allowing Germany to arm himself.

Austria and Czechoslovakia, Germany was not enough for a war with the USSR, for the necessary potential the Germans were given almost all of Europe, including France. The “strange war” - only strange at first glance, is that Hitler allowed the British to evacuate from Dunkirk, stopping Tanks Guderian for almost three days, allows us to suspect that Hitler is a protege of the Anglo-Saxons, who subsequently completed his task. Let us recall what Harry Truman said: “If we see that Germany wins, then we should help Russia, and if Russia will win, we should help Germany, and so let them kill as much as possible, although I would not want to see Hitler a winner under no circumstances. ” Hitler was not supposed to be a winner, and he fulfilled his role, inflicting huge damage on the Soviet Union.

The evil of capitalism


The Second World War finally approved the Anglo-Saxons as masters of the world capitalist system, eliminating Japan in the east as an empire and yielding tremendous profits in the war. Post-war Western Europe was virtually enslaved and occupied by the Anglo-Saxons, the dollar became a world currency, gold reserves from many countries migrated to the United States for storage. However, there was one significant “but”: the main task was not solved, the Soviet Union not only survived, it had already created a whole block of socialist countries, created an independent world pole of socialism, turned into a cosmic and nuclear superpower.

Under Stalin, capitalists were never considered friends, world capitalism was understood as the antipode, the enemy with which “peaceful coexistence” is possible only on the balance of containment. That was the only thing right. Miguel de Lewis said about capitalism that capitalism is a religion where banks are churches, bankers are priests, wealth is paradise, poverty is hell, rich are saints, poor are sinners, wealth is blessed, money is God. Capitalism has reached its zenith and has become an absolute evil for mankind, turning into a planetary virus, corrupting morality, absorbing resources.

The indisputable plus of capitalism, competition, is a thing of the past. With the final establishment of transnational monopolies, competition turned into fiction, and with the disappearance of the world pole of socialism, the core of which was the Soviet Union, the external competition of the two systems also disappeared, leaving capitalism no positive for humanity in consumer morality and the cult of money.

For a jar of jam and a packet of cookies


The same monarchists in modern Russia and other bad boys who rejoiced at the bourgeois “jar of jam” and the “packet of cookies” gloatingly note that the USSR died because it was originally unpromising, initially utopian.

No, not because the Soviet Union died, not because "the menacing squad fell in battles without drawing swords,". Flirting with the West, the hope of peaceful coexistence with the antipode is the main reason that began in the era of Nikita Sergeyevich, which gave the first crack in the foundation of ideology, in the strength of morality. The era of "dear Leonid Ilyich" with the unconditional recognition of the American landing on the moon, the "cosmic triumph" of the USA made it possible to sow the seeds of worship of the West, to raise doubts about socialism in the first place among the party nomenclature itself, which became the main traitor of socialism, true Soviet achievements in space, a traitor the very idea of ​​communism.

The Kremlin chatterbox and dreamer Mikhail Sergeyevich only completed what was started. Friendship with a deadly enemy ultimately led to the death of the Soviet Union.

Socialism did not lose because it was weaker or worse, our politicians lost to inveterate hypocrites, duplicity and hypocrisy, the vile political cheaters of capitalism. Soviet diplomats and officials were the first to become admirers of the golden calf, figuratively speaking, they sold their souls for material wealth.

We have what we have. Russia in capitalism, in the alien pole, under the rules of others. Those in power keep their treasures in foreign banks and foreign currency. There is a brisk trade in resources and the sale of Soviet military developments. Their “misfortune" is the Soviet legacy of the space and nuclear superpower. The global masters of capitalism do not need such a potential. The frank betrayal of the country, as under Boris Nikolaevich, was pleasant to the Anglo-Saxon masters, but lowered the ratings of the ruling "democracy" below nowhere.

The paradox is that the West itself pushes capitalist Russia out of its capitalist “sandbox” only because the authorities in Russia are forced to raise their rating among the people, somehow to maintain the image of a great country dependent on the West in front of the people.

The fact that Europe, which is under the heels of the Anglo-Saxons, accuses the USSR at the beginning of World War II, in one way or another, the Russian "elite" supports, renaming the Soviet street names, misinterpreting the Soviet past in television and movies, destroying many of the cynical achievements of socialism for the people reforms in the failures of health and education, science and culture.

Is there a bright future?


Is there a bright future for capitalism in Russia? Honestly, this is hard to believe.

Russia must remain strong, and when it is at a different pole, playing by the rules of others, this is impossible. It turns out that either a foreign lobby will destroy Russia as a great power, or Russia must return the second independent pole of world power, revive socialism, a renewed Soviet Union.

Capitalism is doomed. He survived his appointment, becoming a cancer of humanity, an absolute evil that Russia needs to part with, and the sooner the better.

Perhaps the Germans, with whom the Anglo-Saxons have repeatedly confronted the Russians, need to realize this (there is the experience of the GDR). Russia and Germany could create a new social system by defeating absolute evil together.
Author:
Photos used:
felsefetasi.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

177 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. eagle owl 4 October 2019 05: 14 New
    • 14
    • 11
    +3
    Is there a bright future for capitalism in Russia?
    The fact is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere, including in Europe, and even more so in the United States. This is easy to understand, realizing that, for example, the bankruptcy of Areva or the shipyards that built the Mistral are called nationalization, and the U.S. trade war with China or the recent sanctions on agricultural Europe over Boeing (!!! - is it anyway?) - protectionism. Those. having nothing to do with the free market and the inviolability of private property situations.
    And the most important thing was said yesterday in Valdai - "we all entered an era when there will be no world order at all." Therefore, one should not dream of either capitalism or traditional socialism. There will be something third, most likely what is now called state or centralized capitalism. Which is devoid of many features of the traditional, such as direct competition. and took centralized management and state planning from socialism - this is in China, the Russian Federation, the USA ... Not in Europe - and they famously pass overseas abroad
    1. eagle owl 4 October 2019 05: 51 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Tfu. Sanctions, of course, because of Airbus. Although it will be more correct - precisely because of Boeing wink
    2. Mikhail Drabkin 4 October 2019 05: 54 New
      • 17
      • 3
      +14
      You uhu write
      The thing is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere ...
      ...Those. having nothing to do with the free market and the inviolability of private property ...
      And most importantly - "we have all entered an era when there will be no world order at all." Therefore, one should not dream of either capitalism or traditional socialism.

      —- The ebbs and flows of nationalization and privatization of industry is not new ... existed no later than from the middle of the XNUMXth century (France, Great Britain, USA (Chrysler)
      -The basic rule of the ideology of capitalism is the omnipotence of money. Free market and private property are an expression of this omnipotence. And the fragmentation and atomization of society which is EASY (not just “easier”) to control the power of money. “Divide and conquer” is the rule at the heart of the fetishization of “personality” .... to children like Greta Tunberg.
      —- The basic rule of the ideology of socialism is development in the interests of society.

      —- “The absence of world order” is not proof of the end of capitalism or socialism. This more likely confirms the thesis of uneven development under capitalism, and the thesis of the struggle between the two systems.
      —- In China, they build socialism by the way, and take advantage of the two systems. What they did to varying degrees in Hungary, East Germany, SFRY, Poland, (and even in the USSR, collective farm markets, plots of land and artels)... And at the parade on October 1, in honor of the 70th anniversary of the People's Republic of China, one of the three banners over Tianyanmen is the Soviet, the scarlet, the Sickle and the Hammer !!
      1. eagle owl 4 October 2019 06: 08 New
        • 5
        • 11
        -6
        -The main rule of the ideology of capitalism is the omnipotence of money.
        This is called private property. In which, upon nationalization, for example, Areva, the state creeps in, forcing private individuals who have absolutely no relation to citizens to rescue the bankrupt private owner by force of private property, i.e. violating exactly what you called "the power of money." Which by the way is regulated by free competition, which Areva lost. The double negation of capitalism is only one example. And a lot of examples, i.e. there is NO capitalism. Chtd
      2. Chaldon48 4 October 2019 12: 29 New
        • 11
        • 1
        +10
        China does not build socialism; it is only to strengthen and perpetuate Chinese civilization, to make it strong and invincible. Russia must do the same, before it’s too late, until the human resource is exhausted.
        1. Alena Frolovna 4 October 2019 15: 26 New
          • 17
          • 2
          +15
          4 October 1993.

          Note of the murdered


          “Brothers, when you read these lines, we will no longer be alive. Our bodies, shot through, burn out in these walls. We appeal to you who are fortunate enough to come out alive from this bloody massacre.

          We loved Russia. We wanted the order that was finally determined by God to be restored to this earth. His name is collegiality; inside it, every person has equal rights and duties, and no one is allowed to transgress the law, no matter how high he is.

          Of course, we were naive simpletons, for our gullibility we are punished, they will shoot us and in the end they will betray us. We were only pawns in someone's well-designed game. But our spirit is not broken. Yes, it's scary to die. However, something supports, someone invisible says: “You purify your soul with blood, and now Satan will not get it. And perishing, you will be much stronger than the living. "

          In our last minutes we appeal to you, citizens of Russia. Remember these days. Do not look away when our disfigured bodies will, laughing, demonstrate on television. Remember everything and do not fall into the same traps we fell into.

          Forgive us. We also forgive those who were sent to kill us. They are not to blame ...

          But do not forgive, curse the demonic gang that has sat down on Russia’s neck.

          Do not let trample the great Russia.


          Our souls are with you.

          Russia is invincible.
          House of Soviets, 04.10.93».

          In the days of sorrow unquenchable
          In the days of robbery and gulba -
          God save my Russia
          Do not cross out her fate.
          She slandered, crucified
          Eroded ... Raven circles.
          She, as a mother, is not to blame
          That the children left her.

          Gleb Gorbovsky
    3. Civil 4 October 2019 07: 27 New
      • 14
      • 35
      -21
      No, not because the Soviet Union died, not because "the menacing squad fell in battles without drawing swords,". Flirting with the West, hope for peaceful coexistence with the antipode


      1. The generations of citizens of the USSR who were 1991-18 years old in 60 are to blame. None of them defended the homeland. Infantiles grown by the last real communists.
      2. Only real big-growing young people blame Gorbachev's “dad”, who for them, for millions, had to decide and protect everything.
      3. Well, how is chewing gum? Jeans? And then in the 90s, you also profiled Soviet industry.
      4. In general, if people had 1991-18 years old in 60, if they have a conscience, they should refuse pensions. You did not deserve them and did not earn.
      1. BAI
        BAI 4 October 2019 09: 13 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        Generations of citizens of the USSR to whom in 1991 were 18-60 years old are to blame.

        Citizens who were invited to consider 1989-25 in 45 as a preferential category are “citizens affected by perestroika”.
        1. Tatyana 5 October 2019 17: 20 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Civil
          1. Generations of citizens of the USSR who in the 1991 year were 18-60 years are to blame. None of them defended the homeland. Infantiles grown by the last real communists. 2. Only real big-growing young people blame Gorbachev's “dad”, who for them, for millions, had to decide and protect everything.

          Silent, Civilian, if you yourself were personally standing in the backyards aside from the then history - those desperate and bloody days of the 1989-1993 years - and you yourself did not see anything and did not understand what was happening!
          Only a blind cynic from the depths, like you, can say such things as you say!

          You yourself, go ahead, did not fight for the country and did not fight either in St. Petersburg or in Moscow during those “perestroika” and counter-bourgeois years — and they condemned everyone else in a row with your insult! They poured on their working people their speculative "slops" and now mock compatriots!
      2. Svarog 4 October 2019 09: 19 New
        • 28
        • 6
        +22
        Quote: Civil
        4. In general, if people had 1991-18 years old in 60, if they have a conscience, they should refuse pensions. You did not deserve them and did not earn.

        It is not necessary to so categorically blame those who are cynically deceived and betrayed. As then and now, not everyone understood the essence of what was happening.

        Quote: Civil
        Is there a bright future for capitalism in Russia? Honestly, this is hard to believe.

        Russia has no future under capitalism and a 20-year history has clearly shown this. The stratification of society is only growing, as is the number of people who are not happy, the demographic situation is terrible, industry, education, science, medicine, everything breaks another bottom ..
        The future can only be in a state where the vast majority of citizens feel confident in the future ...
        1. My address 4 October 2019 10: 23 New
          • 20
          • 0
          +20
          good afternoon hi , Vladimir, svarog! I will continue your comment with two statements and three jokes:
          - We are withdrawing money from the economy, and all developed countries of the world, such as the United States, are dumping trillions into the economy. And we withdraw hundreds of billions. This is a targeted government policy ... Our economic financial policy is determined by a liberal team that lives within the framework of the Washington Consensus and continues to implement its provisions in a situation where they are no longer used even by the IMF. Mikhail Khazin, economist.
          - I refuse to understand why privatize profitable companies. If a company makes a profit - why privatize it? <...> Here you can see the analogies with privatization in 90 - then profitable companies also privatized. In general, I see only one reason for the privatization of profitable enterprises: those who today are at the helm of these companies or informally supervise them in power, they want to receive additional transfers (this is transfer, transfer of funds, objects, entities from one state to another) facilities. Further - even though the grass does not grow. Especially when it comes to infrastructure companies, monopolies and those who dominate the market. Nikita Krichevsky, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute of Economics, RAS.
          - With age, my vision deteriorated completely and now I see no prospects at all.
          - The most common phrases in Russia years through 20-25: 1. How could we know? 2. Time was like that ... 3. What could we do? 4. I myself have always been against it.
          - Well, Seryoga? How are you? - Yes, and do not ask, that with work, that with health and treatment, that with the study of children - And what is the reason? - How in what? Obama and Trump are to blame! belay
          1. Svarog 4 October 2019 10: 25 New
            • 15
            • 2
            +13
            Quote: My address
            - With age, my vision deteriorated completely and now I do not see any prospects at all.
            - The most common phrases in Russia in 20-25 years: 1. How could we know? 2. The time was such ... 3. And what could we do? 4. I myself have always been against it.

            I agree with every word hi
        2. Vadim237 4 October 2019 14: 07 New
          • 4
          • 23
          -19
          "The demographic situation is terrible, industry, education, science." There is no need to thicken the paint, in Russia only with medicine it’s bad, there is positive dynamics in everything else, including demographics, since 83000 people died more than the figure for a 150 millionth country was born is rather meager.
          1. Lannan Shi 4 October 2019 14: 59 New
            • 18
            • 4
            +14
            Quote: Vadim237
            in everything else there is a positive trend including demographics as 83000

            You're lying. Insolently. January-July of this year is minus 220 thousand. There will be statistics for August soon, minus will increase. Even the import of Tajiks no longer covers extinction. Of. numbers. Rosstat website.
            1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 20: 07 New
              • 4
              • 10
              -6
              You're lying. Insolently. January-July of this year is minus 220 thousand. No, recently, by presidential decree, all residents of LDNR, of whom 1500000, began to be issued with Russian passports - why is it not an option for you to eliminate demographic bias, but also plan B - a simplification for all our compatriots, of whom more than 25 million who are abroad, to get Russian citizenship - the time will come and the authorities will use it.
              1. bar
                bar 4 October 2019 20: 30 New
                • 12
                • 3
                +9
                And if the Chinese are allowed to receive the “Far Eastern hectare”, the demography will immediately recover.
                1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 22: 31 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  The Chinese will not go to live with us - they already live very well along the coast of the South China Sea, and our marshy mosquito impenetrable tundra, with temperatures in winter, in places more than 60 minus, is not needed by anyone - and even their grandmothers.
          2. bar
            bar 4 October 2019 15: 01 New
            • 14
            • 3
            +11
            It is not necessary to thicken paints, in Russia only with medicine it’s bad

            Apparently, you have not yet managed to come across anything other than medicine in Russia. But judging by the categorical nature of your judgments, your age is still youthful, and you still have ahead. Just do not forget to wipe the glasses, pink.
            Or didn’t I understand your subtle irony?
            1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 19: 32 New
              • 2
              • 10
              -8
              I’m no longer youthful, I participate in production quite extensively and follow science, there are achievements and not small ones - I declare this to you without rose-colored glasses.
              1. bar
                bar 4 October 2019 19: 35 New
                • 9
                • 1
                +8
                I don’t know you personally, I haven’t heard about your achievements, so my impression of your personality was based solely on your posts. As it is.
        3. Observer2014 4 October 2019 19: 34 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Svarog (Vladimir) hi
          ... Russia has no future under capitalism and a 20-year history has clearly shown this .....
          Absolutely correct! hi No. With this, do not understand that. No. There is no future .. What are we building?
          1. Svarog 4 October 2019 19: 42 New
            • 10
            • 3
            +7
            Quote: Observer2014
            What are we building?

            Sergey, I think that WE aren't even there anymore .. THERE ARE THERE and there is a population. They have their own primitive goals, to boil over US and natural resources and dump the families on a hill ... For this reason, we are not building anything .. THEY have built a kingdom for themselves, where they can rob the country and people with impunity and nothing more . Well, or as in a joke .. they still would not refuse serfs ..
            hi
          2. Doliva63 5 October 2019 18: 50 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Observer2014
            Svarog (Vladimir) hi
            ... Russia has no future under capitalism and a 20-year history has clearly shown this .....
            Absolutely correct! hi No. With this, do not understand that. No. There is no future .. What are we building?

            We build confidence in the satisfying past day of the so-called "oligarchs" and the generation of their children.
      3. Mcar 4 October 2019 09: 48 New
        • 14
        • 3
        +11
        Quote: Civil
        1. The generations of citizens of the USSR who were 1991-18 years old in 60 are to blame. None of them defended the homeland. Infantiles grown by the last real communists.

        Words not of husband, but of youth. I'm not talking about passport age.

        That's interesting, what would you do if you were then over 18? Describe a couple, three scenarios - how exactly one could "stand up for the Motherland".
        1. Civil 4 October 2019 12: 51 New
          • 6
          • 11
          -5
          Quote: McAr

          Words not of husband, but of youth. I'm not talking about passport age.

          That's interesting, what would you do if you were then over 18? Describe a couple, three scenarios - how exactly one could "stand up for the Motherland".

          Yes, and grandchildren are almost such - weak and cowardly.
          1. For example, how China tanks crush chewing gum and privatization in August 1991.
          2. Support the Supreme Council to leave in October 1993, when Gaidar made you beggars as church (then) mice.
          3. In July 1996, go out to resolve the issue by voting against Bori drunk.

          You had a lot of chances. But as you sat adhered to the TV, sit on. Looking at empty skeletons of a bygone era.
          1. Mcar 4 October 2019 13: 20 New
            • 14
            • 6
            +8
            Quote: Civil
            1. For example, how China tanks crush chewing gum and privatization in August 1991.

            No need to feint. “China tanks” and “generations of citizens of the USSR” are two different things. Tanks in August 1991 could only Gorbachev. So who are the "overgrown undergrowths" - generations or you?

            Quote: Civil
            2. Support the Supreme Council to leave in October 1993, when Gaidar made you beggars as church (then) mice.

            And what prevented your generation from doing the same when you were used with VAT to completely eliminate any high-value-added production? Or what prevented you from doing the same when you were pulled with pensions?

            Quote: Civil
            3. In July 1996, go out to resolve the issue by voting against Bori drunk.

            You need to learn so that stupidity is not frozen.

            In the capitalist system, in the bourgeois elections, only the bourgeois class wins. This is an axiom. And this must be known in our information age.
            1. Civil 4 October 2019 13: 43 New
              • 4
              • 12
              -8
              And what prevented your generation from doing the same when you were used with VAT to completely eliminate any high-value-added production? Or what prevented you from doing the same when you were pulled with pensions?

              Since the beginning of my career, 4 pension reforms have already passed, looking at the older generation at the helm, it was immediately clear that there was nothing to rely on.
              Next - now it's too late to download. The point of no return was reached in the early 2000s. Now you can only sit and watch how everything collapses.
              1. bar
                bar 4 October 2019 15: 10 New
                • 12
                • 4
                +8
                The point of no return was reached in the early 2000s. Now you can only sit and watch how everything collapses.

                How, and you there too? Also sitting at the TV, looking at empty skeletons? Well, and what was the revolutionary impulse, and how did you breathe (s).
                1. Doliva63 5 October 2019 18: 56 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: bar
                  The point of no return was reached in the early 2000s. Now you can only sit and watch how everything collapses.

                  How, and you there too? Also sitting at the TV, looking at empty skeletons? Well, and what was the revolutionary impulse, and how did you breathe (s).

                  He is right, and you - ... - just to make a sound? For example, I do not see anything good ahead. Even with glasses, even with a microscope.
                  1. bar
                    bar 5 October 2019 19: 58 New
                    • 1
                    • 3
                    -2
                    What is he right about?
                    Generations of citizens of the USSR to whom in 1991 were 18-60 years old are to blame. None of them defended the homeland. Infantiles grown by the last real communists.

                    Yes, and grandchildren are almost such - weak and cowardly.

                    In this he is right? I, too, do not see much good at point blank range, but this is not a reason to blame it on everyone who lives now, and those who still have to live. And another question begs - but what did you do? You yourself defended the homeland? Or, too, weak and cowardly? And if so, then why make sounds?
          2. bar
            bar 4 October 2019 15: 07 New
            • 8
            • 2
            +6
            Yes, and grandchildren are almost such - weak and cowardly.

            Another incubator without a clan without a tribe, which was unlucky with the people.

            You had a lot of chances. But as you sat adhered to the TV, sit on. Looking at empty skeletons of a bygone era.

            Well, you're not one of those? You don’t sit stuck to the monitor? Are you surely doing something for the future of your country? To know something else. I would give an example.
          3. TokarevT 4 October 2019 17: 43 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            My dear, you are so brave that pride takes directly for you! Please, share, please, here your personal data, so that we all know our hero. A photo of the spread of the passport, information about registration, marital status and the availability of children will be enough.
          4. bar
            bar 4 October 2019 19: 44 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            That's interesting, what would you do if you were then over 18? Describe a couple, three scenarios - how exactly one could "stand up for the Motherland".

            Yes, and grandchildren are almost such - weak and cowardly.

            Well, quite self-critical.
      4. Old Orc 4 October 2019 10: 35 New
        • 11
        • 5
        +6
        Unfortunately, you are partially right. The citizens of the USSR are to blame. It was they who executed the criminal order to disperse the strike in the city of Novocherkassk. It was they who began to join and accept people in the party for personal gain. It was they who began to believe that everything that the USSR had was something obligatory. not the result of many years of struggle. With nature, with external and internal enemies, with ourselves. And as a result, phase separation. The inert people went down monolithically, and the fact that they did not sink went up. And as a result .... We got what we deserve.
        1. nikvic46 4 October 2019 16: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Andrei. And what prevents you from fighting the current injustice? Bold at all times
          people. But keep in mind you will have to work for the family, and at the same time your impulse.
          1. Old Orc 4 October 2019 16: 37 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: nikvic46
            And what prevents you from fighting current injustice?

            Lack of understanding of how this can be done systematically and efficiently, rather than effectively
        2. Chaldon48 4 October 2019 17: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          You want to say that he was nobody and nobody remained, he was before everything, he is now the king!
        3. nikvic46 5 October 2019 07: 03 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Andrei. Accusing people of inertia is the road to nowhere. If you remembered Novocherkassk, why didn't you remember General Shaposhnikov? It’s only because such a person doesn’t want any kind of power. The people have always raised the motive force for any struggle and war.
          1. Old Orc 5 October 2019 08: 41 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: nikvic46
            Accusing people of inertia is the road to nowhere.

            A refusal to admit guilt is a refusal to find the reason why people became inert. This is the first step to repeat. To my deep regret, it is the inertia of most people that always leads to the death of the country. And the Soviet Union was no exception. What is particularly perplexing is that until the last hour, the Union was indeed under the control of the people. It can be said the only democratic state on planet Earth
            1. Tatyana 5 October 2019 18: 03 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Old Orc
              Which is especially strong puzzling, this is until the last hour, the Union was really under the control of the people.

              You are mistaken. This has not happened already, starting with Khrushchev.

              Andrei Fursov on the causes of the collapse of the USSR. Published: April 19 2014 of the year.
              1. Doliva63 5 October 2019 19: 06 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: Tatiana
                Quote: Old Orc
                Which is especially strong puzzling, this is until the last hour, the Union was really under the control of the people.

                You are mistaken. This has not happened already, starting with Khrushchev.

                Andrei Fursov on the causes of the collapse of the USSR. Published: April 19 2014 of the year.

                Yes, it all started with Khrushchev, I said it a thousand times. But there is also a share of Stalin's guilt - he did not provide for a successor or a mechanism for transferring power. But maybe I want too much from him, he already did everything for the country that he could.
                1. Tatyana 5 October 2019 20: 21 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Yes, it all started with Khrushchev, I said it a thousand times. But there is also a share of Stalin's guilt - he did not provide for a successor or a mechanism for transferring power. But maybe I want too much from him, he already did everything for the country that he could.

                  Yes, there is no fault of him. There then, such a struggle for power "above" was on the part of the party and Soviet nomenclature that Stalin was simply essentially killed. And he was preparing to replace Kirov, as far as I know.
                  The Party-Soviet nomenclature did not like the procedures under Stalin for imposing criminal liability for slovenliness and negligence of officials, as well as for dismissing workers from their posts. So Khrushchev canceled all this - and all the officials were that very. satisfied!
      5. Victor N 4 October 2019 12: 02 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Your youthful maximalism is busy, but no more: everything is much more complicated.
      6. Vadim237 4 October 2019 14: 02 New
        • 4
        • 9
        -5
        In the 90s, these same guys almost all the factories themselves pulled away - the leadership waved, one sent a new German machine unpacked for scrap, the other 30 trucks and special equipment were sent there, the third gave all the dairy herd under the knife and scored it all. let it be so worth it "and now they are sitting there and whining - Putin is to blame for them and there have been tens of millions of such cases. All this has already passed.
        1. nikvic46 4 October 2019 16: 24 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Vadim. Everywhere it was different. And they sold out chairs from the red corner. And the other head of the shop, so as not to pull the equipment, sealed the shop. For which he was almost sent to court.
          Remember the prophecy. Today you are laughing at someone. And tomorrow you will be even worse.
      7. frog 4 October 2019 14: 41 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        If it's not a secret, how old are you yourself?
        1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 19: 37 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          The third ten went - but eyewitnesses of those events work for me and me, and the dofig chronicles were told and shown more by thousands of people.
          1. frog 4 October 2019 20: 04 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Eeee .... You have two .... callsigns and you are both simultaneously broadcast? Funny .... Oh well.
            You point by point or you can "slice"?
            1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 01: 57 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Everything that I described was actually in all the former republics - all were stolen and plundered exclusively by their own.
          2. bar
            bar 4 October 2019 20: 34 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            I had no doubt. Your youth certainly justifies your optimism. Wisdom comes later with experience. With my own experience, not from eyewitness accounts.
            1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 00: 52 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Wisdom about the USSR came long ago - even when I learned how to count and calculate where to invest it, and where it doesn’t cost — alas, the USSR leadership didn’t have this, half of the world was planted on its neck, and finally the “neck” broke.
              1. bar
                bar 5 October 2019 07: 13 New
                • 5
                • 2
                +3
                Under socialism, the hucksters had no place. Wisdom then apparently came when the USSR was already over, and the revelry of the market began. And now, let’s say something to you.
                1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 22: 38 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  To sell something - from the beginning you need to create something, then what will be the demand. "Under socialism, the hucksters had no place." Well, yes - they were all underground and they all ran to them in order to get the necessary goods or products, including from abroad.
                  1. bar
                    bar 8 October 2019 12: 02 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    To sell something - from the beginning you need to create something, then what will be the demand.

                    Now this is no longer necessary. Most of what will be in demand is created by the Chinese. A minority are our Euro-American "colleagues." It remains only to sell. I do not say that it is simple. This is difficult, this is marketing, this is logistics, etc. But this is not what the economy should be based on.
      8. saigon 4 October 2019 15: 29 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Yes, no, Vadim is a civilian and we earned them and earned (those who were 18-60 in their 91s).
        Chewing gum, jeans, everything at your level is to eat and chew, but to put on desks for the tailbone, what do you know about civilian times?
        Yes, about conscience, it is very much pushed back, right to tears.
        I just suspect that it’s not you and people like you who wound around me and people like me in Transcaucasia, Central Asia and other beautiful places (otherwise you can listen to our conscience, though we see our conscience differently)
      9. nikvic46 4 October 2019 16: 05 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Vadim: One must assume that you were not involved in any of those times, but you still have everything ahead.
        1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 19: 41 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          The truth is not involved - because I create, but not destroy, and I will not destroy, since they bring me money
      10. aybolyt678 4 October 2019 18: 59 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Quote: Civil
        None of them defended the homeland.

        The year 91 was preceded by 6 years of perestroika. During which systematically public consciousness was formed in such a way that everything that the Soviet system of education relied on was subjected to destruction, ridicule, shame. The chaste Soviet consciousness was introduced by the idea of ​​the norm of pornography. Who incidentally financed the AIDS-Info newspaper? The fight against alcoholism ended with the cessation of the state’s monopoly on the production of alcohol, and Marxism ended with the postulate that the market would destroy everything .... The impact was systemic, at the state and individual levels, they could not resist this. And the KGB apparatus became the main roof of Perestroika.
      11. Campanella 5 October 2019 11: 50 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Isn't it harsh? Is that a role model in everything?
        91 is only the time of X, when all previous mistakes and the time of the last drop converged and formed.
      12. The comment was deleted.
    4. Stas157 4 October 2019 07: 48 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      Quote: Uhu
      Is there a bright future for capitalism in Russia?
      Thing oh that capitalism as such does not exist today nowhere, including in Europe

      Where did he go? Now it is capitalism, and in Russia it is still with a bad peculiarity, originally from the feudal system - Capitalism is for YOURS.

      For reference, the main feature of any capitalism is the exploitation of wage labor, and private ownership of the means of production. Russia is just right for these characteristics.
      1. aybolyt678 4 October 2019 19: 01 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Stas157
        For reference, the main feature of any capitalism is the exploitation of wage labor,

        Can i ask you? - Are single entrepreneurs self-employed capitalists or self-employed proletarians?
    5. To be or not to be 4 October 2019 12: 41 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Uhu Today, 05: 14

      The thing is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere .. "
      Urr aa !!
      1. There is no longer private ownership of fixed assets wink
      2. The distribution of profit is made evenly among all members of the company wink (Miller weeps ..)
      3. The work of every citizen became the need of his life. And not a means of survival. The labor market and unemployment as its basis disappeared.
      4. The capitalist countries of the world even in the era of its global stage. they do not squabble among themselves for raw materials markets and strong markets do not lower the weak (and Europe is just fooling around with US strokes wink )
      5. The crises of the world capitalist system have disappeared on their own. True, the world is now on the verge of another. But this is no longer capitalistic (China is to blame wink )
      6. The militarization of economies does not happen .. All funds are spent on raising the level of poor countries (Europe, how is it with your 2% nVFP to maintain the US military-industrial complex?)
      "State or centralized capitalism" is just a mask on the capitalist world masquerade ..
      Capitalism goes further. It erases the borders of states and statehood itself. And nations and peoples ... ...
    6. IS-80_RVGK2 4 October 2019 22: 48 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Uhu
      The fact is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere, including in Europe, and even more so in the United States.

      The fact is that this is a banal demagogy. Has private ownership of the means of production gone? Nowhere to go. So capitalism has not gone anywhere.
    7. vvnab 7 October 2019 11: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The fact is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere


      So him never was not in the form as it is declared by Western countries. Tell the Indians about "free competition" or the Chinese, the time of the Opium Wars!

      Capitalism is:
      - everything is a commodity
      - the goal of economic relations is profit

      The rest is from the evil one ...
      1. brat07 11 October 2019 02: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: vvnab
        The fact is that capitalism, as such, now does not exist anywhere


        So him never was not in the form as it is declared by Western countries. Tell the Indians about "free competition" or the Chinese, the time of the Opium Wars!

        Capitalism is:
        - everything is a commodity
        - the goal of economic relations is profit

        The rest is from the evil one ...

        Based on the "classical" definition of capitalism, then you are wrong.
        And if from today's realities, then you are not absolutely wrong.
        1. Leonid Anatolevich 13 October 2019 13: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          American Indians were not destroyed by capitalism, just like China or Palestine and Syria - this is the working name for fooling Soviet citizens with chauvinism
    8. Leonid Anatolevich 13 October 2019 13: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Capitalism was invented by Marx as a stage of development, and therefore some non-Marxists quite dispense with it.
  2. Mikhail Drabkin 4 October 2019 05: 18 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    Would such a Russia become a superpower ... in 1917? The country (in 1991) was saved only by the Soviet margin of safety, hurt from a superpower ...
    This can not and do not want to understand ...

    -The political, ideological and media war of the West with Russia is waged EXACTLY because the West understands the origins of the power of the USSR, and because the West is afraid of the Russian genetic need for justice.
    —— This war may fade, but it is “permanent.”
    -“Peaceful coexistence based on a balance of power” was the best state of relations with the West for Russia.
    —- It kept the vector and the moment of the civilizational development of the USSR, world leadership .. industrial, intellectual and defense potential, and gave the Soviet people a predictable future and confidence in the future.
    —-... but they lost the gains of socialism (not only for themselves, but for the whole of humanity!) Due to the well-known betrayal, the Cold War ....
    -and because the Soviet people got used to the achievements of socialism, took them for granted, unlearned how to work and bear responsibility for what they had learned, and was ideologically corrupted, became politically infantile and believed in the promises of the Sirens of Westernism about capitalism with flaws “which are still no worse than now. . ”
    —- The Soviet people could live as before, but they were tired of it. I wanted to "accelerate."
    1. Grandfather 4 October 2019 06: 49 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      —- The Soviet people could live as before, but they were tired of it. I wanted to "accelerate."

    2. bar
      bar 4 October 2019 08: 44 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      the Soviet people got used to the achievements of socialism, took them for granted, unlearned how to work and bear responsibility for what they had learned and was corrupted ideologically, became politically infantile and believed in promises

      Are you out of luck with the people? Are you from another nation? You stood apart from debauchery and infantilism? Have you ever believed anyone's promises?
      Do you take too much on yourself, blaming the whole people, dear? Is it not this people who created everything that we are now eating up? Is it based on the achievements of that people our modern little successes in some places?
      1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 14: 15 New
        • 1
        • 10
        -9
        "What are we eating now?" Still in the 90s it was eaten up and high .. but - by your friends from the Communist Party and not only with a high-class Soviet education.
        1. bar
          bar 4 October 2019 14: 52 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          Perhaps you are not quite up to date on infancy, but come on point by point. In what places in the modern economy of Russia is life still warming? I will list - oil and gas production, military-industrial complex and nuclear energy. And what these industries are now living on was created by the depraved, infantile people in the USSR, and it was with a high-class Soviet education. The military-industrial complex in the USSR was generally a priority, and all the foundations for the success of modern weapons were created then.
          1. Vadim237 4 October 2019 19: 53 New
            • 0
            • 8
            -8
            "In what places in the modern economy of Russia is life still warming?" I will say more - it’s not warm in everyone, but life goes on and it develops in its own way - changing equipment, using new programs for development, new materials, new production technologies — 30 years have passed since the USSR, everything that was created then was physically and mentally outdated.
            1. VeteranVSSSR 4 October 2019 19: 59 New
              • 8
              • 1
              +7
              All-all ???, and T72, and MiG / SUSHKI. You only use what was done in the USSR. ''
              1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 01: 44 New
                • 0
                • 7
                -7
                From the USSR I got a GAZ 21-61 model year, restored in the procession, a collection of cameras, shotguns and a P18 milling cutter manufactured by Czechoslovakia - all this can be put under glass no more, all the equipment is in German and Russian production. From T 72, MiG and Sushki - only the hull and glider remained - all the guts are new and modernized in Russia.
                1. Campanella 5 October 2019 12: 00 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  You are an amateur! Do you think modernization of the old is a success?
                  Where are the fundamentally new solutions? Where are the design new developments? And where do they come from if the fundamental and branch sciences are killed? You are talking nonsense ...
                  1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 22: 44 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    "You are an amateur! Modernization of the old do you think is success?
                    Where are the fundamentally new solutions? Where are the design new developments? And where do they come from if the fundamental and branch sciences are killed? You’re talking nonsense here ... "The amateur is just you - since the equipment is now considered new, there are plenty of new design developments, there’s nothing that you produced 30 years ago - that's why you are talking nonsense.
            2. bar
              bar 4 October 2019 20: 27 New
              • 7
              • 1
              +6
              May I disagree with you? I am also not a boy, I have worked in mechanical engineering for almost 40 years, and I do not have such an enthusiastic opinion about our economy. Radio electronics has died, machine tool industry has died, the automotive industry has switched to a full-cycle screwdriver assembly, it’s sad to remember about astronautics, the training of qualified specialists has recently been discussed. With the exception of certain places where life is "warming" the whole economy is buy / sell and banks / finance.
              1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 01: 53 New
                • 1
                • 6
                -5
                "Radio electronics has died" - "KRET", "Roselectronics". "Machine tool construction has died" - STAN and 46 factories throughout Russia - the last word for the client that he wants and will buy. "Automotive industry switched to screwdriver assembly" - Localization of at least 50% is completely screwdriver nowhere. Cosmonautics - the development of methane: LRE, DRRE and YaERD continues, and the manufacture of satellites, too. So finish the panic.
                1. bar
                  bar 5 October 2019 07: 29 New
                  • 6
                  • 2
                  +4
                  I understand that you are not aware that industry in the USSR was developed by "clusters." For example, in the Penza region there was a cluster of radio electronics. It was an excellent prestigious university, which trained classy specialists. Throughout the region there were a bunch of factories in different cities. Now there is none of this. In the Samara region there was an aerospace cluster. There was a bearing plant, Kuznetsov Design Bureau with a motor plant, an aircraft factory. Now there is none of this either. About cosmonautics without tears, it’s better not to remember. Automotive in the same Togliatti was sold to the French and switched to a screwdriver assembly of logans from imported components, with "localization" in the logistics gaskets that re-stick foreign labels in several neighboring hangars. Dozens of factories that actually once worked on the VAZ conveyor are closed, personnel are fired. And you can go on forever.
                  I can understand your optimism of a successful businessman who successfully fit into the market and seized fate by his beard. But I can’t share it. The real situation in the Russian economy is far from your pink snot.
                  1. IS-80_RVGK2 6 October 2019 11: 47 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    Do not try to prove something to him. Do not feed the horse. This effective manager has fierce euphoria from the more or less successful introduction of foreign technologies in the country. And he does not care deeply for fundamental and other applied science. And most importantly, he has a completely motivated hatred of the USSR. For the order of things that at least was preached then implies the impossibility of squeezing the surplus value in his favor, which is now the source of his well-being.
                    1. Cat man null 6 October 2019 11: 50 New
                      • 2
                      • 5
                      -3
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      This effective manager has fierce euphoria from the more or less successful introduction of foreign technologies in the country

                      Makar, Vadik - supposedly a millionaire. Like a dollar one.

                      The fact that he is not too smart is well known, but - that's how lucky, judging by the Russian classical literature )))

                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      the order of things that at least was preached then implies the impossibility of squeezing surplus value in his favor

                      In it - yes, it is impossible (the Angles cry from such a construction of a phrase fellow ) But in favor of the “Socialists” just got off the palm of their hand, what kind of thread is there in Angola - yes, easily.

                      If you think that then it was much better than now - let me disagree with you laughing
                      1. IS-80_RVGK2 6 October 2019 11: 56 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        If you think that then it was much better than now - let me disagree with you

                        It was better in some ways. Something worse. But in general, turning off the objectively correct path is a high probability of another rake jumping.
                      2. bar
                        bar 6 October 2019 12: 12 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        I’ll clarify - someone is better, someone is worse. Vadik, everything is super, and everything is in a rainbow light. But, as it seems to me,% of those who are worse now are higher than they were in the USSR.
                      3. Cat man null 6 October 2019 13: 19 New
                        • 1
                        • 6
                        -5
                        Quote: bar
                        it seems to me,% of those who are worse now are higher than they were in the USSR

                        Ahem ... a difficult question. I also think a lot. For good - pulls on an article, but writing it is extremely lazy request
                      4. Campanella 8 October 2019 08: 33 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        It is obvious. Supporters of modern Russia are trying to measure everything in things .... But can you really measure everything in them? Man is more than guzzling and s, um. But they have all their life in rolls of toilet paper.
                  2. Vadim237 6 October 2019 23: 57 New
                    • 1
                    • 4
                    -3
                    No, you’re a cat - a fool who is writhing himself as smart trying to show - but it doesn’t work, because you sculpt bullshit on those topics that you don’t understand at all.
                  3. Cat man null 7 October 2019 00: 08 New
                    • 2
                    • 5
                    -3
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    this is you cat - a fool writhing himself smart trying to show

                    Vadim, it’s somehow not clear, but what did you want to say? wink

                    Quote: Vadim237
                    sculpt bullshit on topics that you don’t understand at all

                    Yeah. Especially about corrosion of welds.

                    Vadim, there is such a discipline, ahem, called - "corrosion and metal protection." Once upon a time I was released from the institute on it)))

                    And tell you about the physics of metals and electrochemistry - oh well, what for, not a horse)))

                    Enjoy what has been achieved, and do not meddle ... incomprehensible things to you. And you will be happy yes
                  4. Vadim237 7 October 2019 22: 55 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    “Once upon a time they let me out of the institute.” And that was what you had to start with - what’s you. “Once upon a time they released you.” “Cat - time and technology do not stand still, including welding, and there are electrodes from ESAB and BOHLER which just for welding anti-corrosion seams: in shipbuilding, chemical, industry and boilers. "But telling you about the physics of metals and electrochemistry - well, what the hell, not a horse)))" Yes, you won’t be able to, because you have already forgotten all these disciplines, and you yourself haven’t been engaged in welding - theoretician practice.
            3. Vadim237 7 October 2019 00: 43 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              "And he does not care deeply for fundamental and other applied science." They invest the same money in it, since in the country more than 800 research institutes and design bureaus work. “And the most important thing is that he has a completely motivated hatred of the USSR” - Fully motivated, the Soviet economy squandering all resources, left and right, in the form of expensive one-time projects and helping half the world for “coconuts” and loyalty, but for the ball itself , the country had almost no money from this, but the Soviet people would do everything, including to their own detriment - but to fools like you standing in line and bartering for acquaintance, for everything you needed - that was all acceptable. In the USSR, they created a lot of things, but unfortunately most of the breakthrough and revolutionary projects and solutions did not see the light, all this remained on the shelves of oblivion, and in the 90s the guys who created all this opened the shelves, brushed away dust from their developments and took them away abroad - for a better life, taking with him more than 2000000 developments and patents in all areas: science, industry and the agricultural sector. In this scenario, bankruptcy and the subsequent collapse of the USSR was not inevitable - all people strive for the best, the half-wretched egalitarianism, as well as gagging on topics of economic policy and other things that have been in the USSR for decades - people are tired of the same thing, however, like fairy tales about bright communism. And if I had stayed the USSR, now I wouldn’t be able to create anything, since there would be no materials, no tools, or anything else, I would live in a state apartment and work at a zadrypanny factory on a CNC machine -75 of the year of manufacture, I would receive 150 rubles, stood in line for the deficit and would have led a gray uninteresting existence - since I can’t imagine any other life in the USSR, since it wouldn’t exist in principle otherwise.
              1. bar
                bar 7 October 2019 07: 31 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Fully motivated, the Soviet economy squandering all resources, right and left, in the form of expensive one-time projects and assistance to half the world

                Well, you won’t give anything as efficient as you. Everything in the house, everything in the house. A penny to a penny - and offshore. Nothing will be lost.
              2. Vadim237 7 October 2019 22: 59 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                This all at least brings money, and offshore companies are needed on their own, as an instrument of trade abroad, including when circumventing sanctions.
              3. bar
                bar 8 October 2019 12: 05 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I understand everything perfectly, no need to make excuses. Business is business. But it is not necessary to pretend to be the savior of the Russian economy. Modest need
          2. Campanella 8 October 2019 08: 58 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            You confuse the cause with the investigation. At first the USSR collapsed, and then the developments were dragged abroad to materialize.
            "Midnight leveling ..." and is a zoological competition for survival better?
            Modern Russia is a paradise for villains. Oligarchs, big business, bureaucratic mediocrity are those who succeeded in life. Burn all living things in pursuit of dough and power. They are zombies and drug addicts, and their goal is to receive a dose by defeating the enemy, strengthening their power and the amount of dough. Competition on who is cooler, whose watch is more expensive, whose woman is more expensive ... in general, the Papuans. And you serve this scumbag and at the same time "teach people" life, having a poor idea of ​​its diversity.
            I wonder what you created? Even curious? You are a Russian AlanMask, did you create a Mobile?
            Share what you have made the world happy?
            The fact that you pulled yourself out of the clutches of poverty and living, I realized.
            But what is useful to society for you is not clear, it is clear that you are taking a piece of bread from many others, depriving them not of salaries, but simply of a piece of bread.
          3. bar
            bar 8 October 2019 12: 07 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            You confuse the cause with the investigation. At first the USSR collapsed, and then the developments were dragged abroad to materialize.

            He does not confuse, he deliberately substitutes cause and effect. So he is calmer.
          4. Campanella 8 October 2019 12: 50 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This is even worse if it is. Support for the obviously rotten is a mine for future generations. An objective assessment of what is happening is progress for all of humanity.
            Capitalism, if not replaced, will eat the planet and itself. And so already dirtied the whole planet in the pursuit of profit. Wherever you look they need economic growth! Morons! Spiritually it is necessary to grow, and not increase the amount of toilet paper per capita!
  3. Vadim237 7 October 2019 00: 13 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    "Russia is far from your pink snot." The situation in the economy is normal - and the industry is the same, but at the expense of snot — they’re the main one for you — what a fright. ”There was an aerospace cluster in the Samara Region. There was a bearing plant, Kuznetsov Design Bureau with a motor plant, an aircraft plant. Now, nothing of the same no". - It still works, it is part of the UEC engaged in the production of NK 32 2, PD 14 in the production of gas turbines as well as rocket engines. “Dozens of factories that once worked for the VAZ conveyor are closed, personnel fired” - “You can’t say anything for the production of bolted buckets” There are now clusters and holdings and technology parks - everyone is working and building new ones across the country . You do not know that industry developed in the USSR in "clusters" - it developed on the bulk of the military orders, there was a modest development in the civil sector - the USSR never had competitive products in this segment - some of the production worked at a loss, but this is normal for a planned economy.
    1. bar
      bar 7 October 2019 08: 44 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      The situation in the economy is normal - and in industry the same

      Good for you in your virtual reality, dry and comfortable

      "In the Samara region there was an aerospace cluster. There was a bearing factory, Kuznetsov Design Bureau with a motor factory, an aircraft factory. Now there is none of this either." - It still works, it is part of the UEC engaged in the production of NK 32 2, PD 14 in the production of gas turbines as well as rocket engines.

      Where does the bearing plant work? There has long been a shopping center. The bearings remained only "Vologda" Chinese-made. Where is KB Kuznetsova? Dust off the drawings of the 70s and trying to make ancient engines for the overhaul of Tu-160? Does it convert used engines into gas turbines? What can I say, the flagship of engine building with the remaining hundred pensioners. PD-14 has nothing to do with Kuznetsov.
      I won’t say anything about “buckets with bolts,” I’m tired, and it’s useless to tell something to the generation of comediclab.

      Now there are clusters and holdings and technology parks - everyone is working and building new ones all over the country.

      laughing Yeah work. Legal tax evasion sites. Just what is inside these glamorous skins? Nearby is the Zhiguli Valley technopark, a beautiful facade, behind which are the very “logistic pads” that I have already written about a hundred times. And they are engaged in the "localization of production" of Renault by gluing labels on imported components. You still give Chubais Skolkovo as an example of the effectiveness of the Russian economy. And what, they have "well, a lot of money," and they also probably drown about the success of our economy and industry.
      1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 23: 45 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        "Dust off the drawings of the 70s and trying to make ancient engines for the overhaul of Tu-160?" And you need to spend a hundred billion rubles to create an entirely new engine for the Tu 160th — an idiotic solution, however, they are modernizing the NK 32, and they have the most direct relation to PD 14 since they are developing a line with other manufacturers up to PD 35, and still in the work of NK 361 for a gas turbine locomotive. “What can I say, the flagship of engine building with the remaining hundred retirees” - you generally say about Kuznetsov SNTK OJSC where almost 10000 people work - or about your former shabashka office. "Yeah, work. Legal platforms for tax evasion. Just what is inside these glamorous skins? You can find all the information on the official websites on the Internet who develops what and where you supply. You still give the Chubais Skolkovo as an example of the effectiveness of the Russian economy. Let me give you - 137 billion rubles, the turnover of all 46 companies that work there in 2018 - and for you, Chubais and Rusnano mainly invest in existing enterprises or projects - they themselves do not produce anything. "Here is the Zhiguli Valley technopark, a beautiful facade, behind which are the very “logistic pads” that I have already written about a hundred times. "There are 200 companies registered on the market for more than one year, the technopark itself provides them.
        development of business plans and financial and economic models;
        continuing education programs;
        participation in federal and regional exhibitions;
        registration of patents and certificates for computer programs;
        conference hall services for organizing business events;
        fundraising in projects and selection of loan programs;
        promotion of projects in the media;
        interaction with investors, visiting investment sessions;
        acceleration programs, hackathons;
        industrial design, physical and mechanical research;
        market research, internet promotion strategies;
        development of brand book and corporate identity;
        linguistic services. “Do you have something against all this?”
        "And they are engaged in" localizing the production of "Renault by gluing labels on imported components." VAZ has good sales and profits now - let them re-stick and pay taxes, as well as provide jobs. “Do you have the same thing against this?” "It's useless to tell a generation of comediclab something." And it’s even more useless to tell and prove to those who still have Soviet stereotypes and veneration of Soviet trash.
      2. Campanella 8 October 2019 09: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        What nonsense and foam. According to your statistics and state reporting, the average age has grown, but obituaries even of high-ranking comrades prove the opposite, people do not even live to retirement senators. And such successes in everything.
  • Campanella 8 October 2019 02: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All that you listed works for the defense industry for the most part, the civilian product is practically unknown to the consumer. But even in the defense industry there are a lot of problems with components - this is quality and technology. As far as I know, large microcircuits are cut out on imported crystals or simply ordered abroad.
    The technical solutions are also mostly Soviet, the only way they can be translated into a modern component base.
    And the assortment of this base is clearly inadequate with us, and therefore even in the defense industry we have to use imported element base, launching OCD for a possible further replacement with domestic analogues.
    You should never panic, but pink glasses must be removed. And this means seeing that the current economic and domestic policy has no future.
  • Vadim T. 4 October 2019 05: 22 New
    • 14
    • 2
    +12
    Quote: "Russia and Germany could create a new social system by defeating absolute evil together."
    The article is interesting, I liked it very much. Many thanks to the author. But with the thesis of a political or other alliance with Germany - this is unlikely. The Germans brought too much evil and grief to our land in two world wars. This is not forgotten and not forgiven. This is the first. And secondly, whichever Europeans you take, they are imbued to the bone with the spirit of profit and superiority over us. This spirit, as well as morality, has been planted for five centuries, so much so that it is already impossible to etch all this. So we have no allies and will not have, except our own army and navy. About this, Alexander III said. To survive in the fight against world evil, you must first have a patriotic power that does not creep in the west, and the reunification of all territories lost after 1991. Only in this way we will have a chance to survive and save the country for posterity.
    1. igor1981 4 October 2019 07: 42 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      Quote: Vadim T.
      To survive in the fight against world evil, you must first have a patriotic power that does not creep in the west

      I completely agree with this.
      Quote: Vadim T.
      and the reunification of all territories lost after 1991.

      Are you proposing to unite again with the countries of Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Baltic states? Well, I do not. Firstly, this is impossible; secondly, Russia hardly needs it. With the collapse of the USSR, remember what they were talking about Russia and Russians (not all, but still). And now they say the same Georgia and the Baltic countries. The only thing you need to reunite with Belarus and part of Ukraine.
      And yes, you need to return to the welfare state.
      1. Saul_Rhen 4 October 2019 16: 35 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Belarus and Ukraine are even worse in this regard. They have the genetic "Russia must ...". I had a chance to talk about working with a significant number of "refugees" from Ukraine.
      2. Vadim T. 4 October 2019 18: 18 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Igor, tell me, doesn’t there live a lot of people from Central Asia and the Caucasus in modern Russia? I do not even mean migrant workers, but quite respectable citizens with an eagle profile and a distinctive accent, who are already more in Moscow than Muscovites themselves. And they feel oh-oh-very freely. But this is me, I brought a small counterargument to your thesis. In fact, I had in mind the return of territories, primarily with the Slavic population. And unification itself is possible on the basis of the idea of ​​a social state, and Russia should set an example in this. Then everyone else will catch up if there are positive results. as for the one who said what, one must start from the ruling elite. This is where there is no plowed field for the work of the judiciary. But ordinary people tend to make mistakes and learn from their mistakes. So do not judge strictly the same Ukrainians: they are not all the same as their TV shows. There are black sheep in any herd.
      3. TokarevT 4 October 2019 19: 12 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        And why do Russians need those who say so in their relation in these territories?
  • samarin1969 4 October 2019 05: 35 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    "The paradox is that the West itself pushes capitalist Russia out of its capitalist" sandbox "only because the authorities in Russia are forced to raise their rating among the people, somehow to maintain the image of a great country dependent on the West before the people ..." - In this respected author is right.

    “Perhaps the Germans, with whom the Anglo-Saxons have repeatedly confronted the Russians, need to realize this (there is the experience of the German Democratic Republic). Russia and Germany could create a new social system by defeating absolute evil together ...” - no more chances than the “world Revolution "in 1917m.

    I respect the views of the author Per se, although I do not share. I would like to see a forecast in the article in the spirit of its “ideological inspirers” of the XNUMXthth centuries.
    1. Uncle lee 4 October 2019 06: 08 New
      • 16
      • 4
      +12
      That's when this thorn in the eye disappears, then there will be a chance to restore the USSR!
      The article is thoughtful, weighty, to the author hi
      1. Svarog 4 October 2019 07: 41 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        That's when this thorn in the eye disappears, then there will be a chance to restore the USSR!

        For the revival of the USSR, the disappearance of the dollar is not enough .. of course, if I understand you correctly. In my opinion, first of all, there should be a society’s request for socialism, an active leader who will be able to unite the communists, socialists and other patriots of the country .. Then it will be a thorn and disappear. I am sure that such a chance will soon appear in our country, we just need to not miss it.
        1. Uncle lee 4 October 2019 07: 52 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          The dollar is a symbol of what capitalism brought to us: man to man is a wolf! And all derivatives of this postulate ....
        2. Saul_Rhen 4 October 2019 16: 40 New
          • 1
          • 7
          -6
          Again you have Communists = patriots? Not tired of spreading this nonsense? These "patriots" have already plundered and ruined the country twice over the past 100 years, have taken to the stage of a total lag behind the normally developing countries in almost everything. Look at the former social camp, chat with people. In addition to a few old men and a group of notorious sectarians like you, everyone saw socialism and its “achievements” in the grave.
        3. Alexander Ra 4 October 2019 17: 14 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          I agree with your views.
          Comment. We are captive of capitalism, socialism, communism, investment, economics, patriots, inflation, means of production, .. and other mental inventions of others.
          Quote: Svarog
          will be able to unite communists, socialists and other patriots of the country

          It is necessary to have clarity and obtain physical certainty first of all at the biological level, and only then to formalize it at the ideological, mental level. We can adapt in the environment of our people, having our own image, but not the sum of the peoples. An image is unique, unique, significant. The absence of these signs is disgrace. Today, we Russians are in national disgrace. "Multinational people" - this is nonsense. “All people are brothers” - a deception imposed on the Russians, replacing the Russian property of being an edifier (builder) with permission to parasitize on his life forces. This is not a call for ethnic hatred, but a statement of the difference, a call not to forget the basic biological level of information. We must first rely on our people, always remembering that there are all other peoples, they have their own internal unity.
          1. TokarevT 4 October 2019 19: 31 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Good character, correct speech.
        4. nikvic46 4 October 2019 18: 58 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Vladimir. One wisdom says that it is impossible to enter the same river twice.
          1. Svarog 4 October 2019 19: 00 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: nikvic46
            Vladimir. One wisdom says that it is impossible to enter the same river twice.

            And another wisdom says that history develops in a spiral and everything repeats .. maybe not much has changed ..
          2. Alexander Ra 4 October 2019 23: 26 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            The principle of equifinality says that we will always strive and return to a healthy population development, no matter how we are periodically tried to mutilate.
            1. Cat man null 4 October 2019 23: 40 New
              • 0
              • 5
              -5
              Quote: Alexander Ra
              The principle of equifinality ...

              Quote: Alexander Ra
              ... I would like to do without such alien and vague terms of content

              Truly so yes

              Quote: Alexander Ra
              People, like all living things, live in populations.

              Animals, as a rule, do NOT live in populations.

              Friday evening wink request
      2. BAI
        BAI 4 October 2019 09: 14 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Instead of dlollar, the yuan will appear.
        1. Svarog 4 October 2019 10: 26 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: BAI
          Instead of dlollar, the yuan will appear.

          Only this will not make it easier for us .. hi
      3. Vadim237 4 October 2019 14: 19 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        “There will be a chance to restore the USSR” - This chance was 30 years ago, time was lost and no USSR was possible, except that the integration of Belarus into Russia, and even then Russia would need to invest trillions of rubles in this.
  • Alex66 4 October 2019 06: 14 New
    • 13
    • 5
    +8
    This would be an article and GDP with DAM in ears, but no, they will not believe if they hear it. They have a different task to negotiate with the old masters, so that they would be recognized out of the dirt as princes, they are at enmity with the old elite, seeking recognition, but they despise us as a mob capable of taking power from them. So they spin like snakes in a frying pan, both ours and yours.
    1. Svarog 4 October 2019 07: 45 New
      • 14
      • 5
      +9
      Quote: Alex66
      So they spin like snakes in a frying pan, both ours and yours.


      They were spinning before the elections, as they elected Putin, and they even stopped showing the appearance .. Now they are in a hurry to finish with the social component .. Yesterday Skvortsova said that soon all medicine would be paid, they had already been deprived of pensions, taxed .. So they’re not trying they are "spinning", they already directly show what side they are on and where the people of the country are located ..
  • samarin1969 4 October 2019 06: 26 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    That's when this thorn in the eye disappears, then there will be a chance to restore the USSR!
    The article is thoughtful, weighty, to the author

    ... and other "sources of problems" will appear. Powerful hostile systems will always exist as long as humans exist. hi
  • parusnik 4 October 2019 06: 59 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Russia and Germany could create a new social system by defeating absolute evil together.

    I asked the electrician Petrov:
    - Why did you wrap a wire around your neck?
    Petrov doesn't answer me,
    Hangs and shakes only bots.
  • Van 16 4 October 2019 07: 01 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Without going into terms, I’ll say simply: if we have capitalism now, then I am definitely for socialism.
  • Vitaly Tsymbal 4 October 2019 07: 18 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    For a long time there is neither capitalism, nor socialism in the categories and definitions that were given in the USSR. The collapse of the USSR gave rise to a new ideology - GLOBALISM, which makes it possible to use capitalists and socialists as achievements that have gone into oblivion. An example is the US-China interaction. This is in the economy. In the social sphere in many countries of Europe there are pronounced elements of the socialist. But “globalization” turned out to be beneficial not to a large circle of people whom we classify as “oligarchs,” and the oligarchs on our planet Earth are internationalists. Globalization has led to the fact that the social development of states has stopped; under globalism, states have turned from a social institution into a structure for serving the interests of the "oligarchs." Take a look at any country ... In the initial period when the ideology of "globalism" appeared, breakthrough achievements were made in the interests of all layers of mankind - I am talking about the Internet and mobile communications. It seemed that "globalism" should continue to work for all of humanity, but this did not happen. It is hard to say what will replace the "dying" globalism, and it is unlikely that it will die in the coming decades.
    It’s time to stop the debate about capitalism and socialism — they died and were buried in 1991, and they only speak good things about the dead or do not speak at all !!!!
    1. DEDPIHTO 4 October 2019 07: 49 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Congratulations, you came up with a new state-building globalist. Another of the isms is feudalism, monarchism, capitalism, socialism, communism, and finally progress-globalism. laughing
      1. Vitaly Tsymbal 4 October 2019 07: 59 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        For DEDPICHTO (ALEX)
        We must be more attentive))) And do not think of it yourself for another, passing off your "think-tanks" as strangers. I wrote about the ideology around which the states are formed, and not about the state system around which the ideology is formed)))
    2. Old Orc 4 October 2019 10: 43 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      A striking example of the modernity of globalism is OST INDIAN COMPANY. With cross-border movement of capital, labor, and goods. For the correct movement of capital, privateering, For the movement of workers' hands slavery. For the movement of goods colonial troops.
    3. Ajevgenij 4 October 2019 21: 27 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      "In the initial period when the ideology of" globalism "appeared, breakthrough achievements were made in the interests of all layers of mankind - I'm talking about the Internet and mobile communications."
      A complete lie. The global satellite communications system came from the Almasi et al. Surveillance satellite program. from our side and the same program from the American side. With Internet it seems.
      Read the Chertok.
      1. Vitaly Tsymbal 4 October 2019 21: 41 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I'm not talking about who and on what basis the Internet is made. I mean that it has become available to everyone !!!
  • Stas157 4 October 2019 07: 32 New
    • 14
    • 4
    +10
    . Capitalism is doomed. He survived his appointment, becoming a cancer of humanity, an absolute evil that Russia needs to part with, and the sooner the better.

    There is an apt expression that arose in the 90s when people suddenly began to see: "Everything that the Communists lied about capitalism turned out to be true."

    Although, admittedly, some are quite happy with capitalism - they constantly write to us how good it is under Putin and what was worse in the USSR. I never could understand where these come from?
    1. Revival 4 October 2019 10: 04 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      Well how?
      These are precisely those who are for 100 grades of sausage, and the main thing is even if only he has one, and the neighbors swell with hunger, moreover, that even if they swell because everything went to him alone.
      These people accept any conditions, if their plate is full.
      Yes, they even understand that a great country cannot be built like that, but it is not unnecessary for them if in exchange for this they will have to reduce their personal income from 100 rubles to 99 rubles (although rarely one of them has come to the stage to declare it openly).
      1. Stas157 4 October 2019 12: 36 New
        • 9
        • 3
        +6
        Quote: Revival
        These people accept any conditions, if their plate is full.

        A small, petty-bourgeois petty-bourgeois happiness thoroughly saturated with dull egoism. Such is the current image of the modern “cheers-patriot”, who is struggling to portray well-being in a swamp of pseudo-stability.
        1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 01: 35 New
          • 1
          • 7
          -6
          “Cheers of patriots” - usually bring money to the country, in the form of considerable taxes to the budget - unlike any empty whiners who drowned in a depressing life ditch - while someone waiting in it to get them out of there.
          1. bar
            bar 5 October 2019 20: 02 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Do not worry, do not appreciate. Our people do not like hucksters, even with taxes to the budget. Historically dislikes.
            1. Vadim237 6 October 2019 23: 52 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Well, this is a problem of the people and each individual - there is nothing to be done about it, such as I will envy everywhere and always.
              1. bar
                bar 7 October 2019 07: 25 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I wrote to you from the very beginning - you were out of luck with the people. You can sand him, and you can do loot on him, but he will not stopudov kiss you in the ass for that. Look durga, more grateful.
                1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 23: 53 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  You are only a small part of the people - constantly aching, but dividing nothing and still not trying to improve their position, sit and wait for someone to bring you everything on a silver platter.
                  1. bar
                    bar 8 October 2019 12: 12 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    You made a mistake on all counts. I have a good position, including material, in my life I have achieved all that I wanted, and even more. I do not expect anything, I personally do not need to bring anything, I have everything, what is not - I will buy it, and without loans.
                    "I just feel sorry for the state" (c)
    2. Revival 4 October 2019 10: 22 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      That's about the type of new “owners” here right here (“businessman”): “no one will pay you much. Because the owner has the right to pay at his discretion - the minimum wage from her and we dance. At the enterprise no one doesn't hold - you can leave. "
      And what do we want from those who are above? They have a wonderful replacement below, the same guardians for the people.
      That's all their "Chubais logic."
    3. Saul_Rhen 4 October 2019 16: 43 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      From reality.
  • Plantagenet 4 October 2019 07: 54 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    "Russia and Germany could create a new social system by defeating absolute evil together."


    “The Germanization of the East is not included in our tasks in the sense as previously understood, that is, Germanization, which consists in teaching the population the German language and German laws; we want to ensure that only pure German blood lives in the East.”
    G. Himmler

    "The Slavs must work for us. If we no longer need them, they may die. Therefore, the mandatory vaccinations and medical care by German doctors seem unnecessary.
    The growth of the Slavic population is undesirable. "
    M. Borman

    "You were sent there, not in order to work for the welfare of the peoples entrusted to you, but in order to deflate everything possible.
    ... I intend to rob and it is effective. Anything that may be suitable for the Germans in the East must be immediately removed and delivered to Germany. "
    G. Goering

    "The Slavs must work for us, and if we no longer need them, let them die. Vaccinations and health protection are unnecessary for them. Slavic fertility is undesirable ... education is dangerous. It is enough if they can count to a hundred ... Every educated person is our future enemy.
    All sentimental objections should be dropped. It is necessary to govern these people with iron determination. "
    A. Hitler
  • rocket757 4 October 2019 07: 56 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Is there a bright future for capitalism in Russia? Honestly, this is hard to believe.

    Does the world have a bright future under capitalism?
    Everywhere where a miracle is manifested, the state’s increased concern for citizens, EVERYONE starts to speak and compare with SOCIALISM !!! And this is THEIR press, politics !!!
    Interesting, but WHY so, and not otherwise?
    "capitalism with a human face" does not inspire many people, for example, "Swedish ... Scandinavian SOCIALISM" !!! Here is a paradox!
  • Keyser soze 4 October 2019 08: 40 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    In real life, socialism won. In Scandinavia. The concepts of "capitalism" and "socialism" remained in the 20 century. Now we and you have neo-feudalism. We only did this for 30 years.

    And the war in both East and West will be with neoliberalism / globalism - this is what kills our peoples - greed, oligarchy, world corporations. This is not the usual socialism of the 20 century and the concepts and categories of the past era that you will not explain and you will not defeat.
  • Karabas 4 October 2019 09: 06 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    You will have to start from afar, mentioning the XV-XVI centuries, when capitalism was born in Holland and England, becoming the starting point of competition for leadership in the new social system.

    It was born in Holland, in the dark ages, when witches and heretics were hunted throughout Europe. Some, for example, Spain tortured and killed 30% of their population. Mostly the intelligentsia fled to Holland, there were other orders, everyone is needed, who can bring at least some benefit. So in those days, it was a blessing and salvation for many.
  • Rurikovich 4 October 2019 09: 13 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    Capitalism is doomed. He survived his appointment, becoming a cancer of humanity, an absolute evil that Russia needs to part with, and the sooner the better.

    good But ... as long as people in power are committed to the ideas of capitalism, then he still has to live and live. In order to change something, it is necessary that those who held power would BELIEVE in the moral principles of another system and have the WILL to follow these principles. Like before the 53rd year. We really need a new "Stalin" (adjusted for the current reality), which is not afraid for its people to make changes, thanks to which people will not sell their mothers a green paper ... And for this we need to again create our own civilization with our moral rules, which will be denied access from the outside by elements negative for such a state (a kind of iron curtain), it is necessary to abandon globalism and again create an economy that will develop on internal resources ...
    Is this possible? I do not know. But while the authorities will look at oil prices, and the top will buy yachts and foreign football clubs, it is unlikely ...
    "You stay there - no money" ....
    Sergey, plus material! hi
  • Mcar 4 October 2019 09: 30 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    An article for its three-page format is balanced, informative, and good. In addition to the last sentence:

    Russia and Germany could create a new social systemdefeating absolute evil together.


    A new social system ... And how is it?

    Socialism is:
    - social means of production
    - lack of exploitation of man by man
    - fair distribution of public goods

    Capitalism is:
    - private capital goods
    - exploitation of man by man
    - unfair distribution of public goods

    Well, how to cross it, so that yours and ours? Exploit, but a little - a half cone? Distribute public goods, but a little unfair? Public production, but a little in the interests of some? AS?
    1. AU Ivanov. 4 October 2019 09: 46 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Like in Sweden, for example. There is private ownership of the means of production and an excellent social sphere.
      1. Mcar 4 October 2019 09: 58 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        Like in Sweden, for example. There is and private ownership of the means of production and an excellent social sphere.

        It is still there. Begin to get used to the past form of the verb - it was.

        All social nishtyaks in capitalist countries have been wrested by the proletariat from capital with meat in a constant bloody struggle. This time. And secondly, capital lost these very social buns to the proletariat only because of the very fact of the existence of the socialist system and its main stronghold of the USSR. The exploiting class was inferior to the proletariat for fear of being overthrown. Now there is no socialist system, there is no one to look back at, therefore, the nuts can again be tightened completely. The process of reducing social achievements is already in full swing, somewhere more, somewhere less.
        1. AU Ivanov. 4 October 2019 10: 01 New
          • 3
          • 12
          -9
          Tell me, when did the Swedes start this bloody fight? And, by the way, their social buns began to appear long before the October coup. The socialist system of the USSR for many countries served as an example of how NOT to do.
          1. Saul_Rhen 4 October 2019 16: 50 New
            • 0
            • 8
            -8
            A plus. Local communists and ideologists do not dream of a normal life, but of revolution, so that you can steal in full.
          2. nikvic46 4 October 2019 19: 02 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Andrei. The working-class movement was formed long before our Revolution. Why did the movement "Hands off Russia."
  • Nyrobsky 4 October 2019 11: 14 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The Kremlin chatterbox and dreamer Mikhail Sergeyevich only completed what was started. Friendship with a deadly enemy ultimately led to the death of the Soviet Union.
    At one time, US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said - "It’s dangerous to fight with the USA, and it’s mortally dangerous to be friends with the USA." It is a pity that this bastard made friends with them ...
  • BAI
    BAI 4 October 2019 13: 14 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Russia in capitalism, in the alien pole, under the rules of others. Those in power keep their treasures in foreign banks and foreign currency. There is a brisk trade in resources and the sale of Soviet military developments. Their “misfortune" is the Soviet legacy of the space and nuclear superpower. The global masters of capitalism do not need such a potential. The frank betrayal of the country, as under Boris Nikolaevich, was pleasant to the Anglo-Saxon masters, but lowered the ratings of the ruling "democracy" below nowhere.

    The curators of Russia from the United States have already made sure that not only the ruling elite of Russia are traitors. This opportunity is now provided to everyone:

    Spelling saved.
    If you know something that could harm Russia, merge and you will be happy!
  • Vadim237 4 October 2019 13: 37 New
    • 4
    • 14
    -10
    "The Soviet Union was rapidly developing, turning into a powerful, self-sufficient power, into a new, independent and dangerous pole of power for world capitalism." The USSR was never self-sufficient when there was a constant shortage of materials, food, equipment and civilian consumer goods, a confirmation of this, and it also squandered most of its exports for barter and the loyalty of all the world's social ministers, hence the domestic shortage. "Dangerous to world capitalism." - Well, yes, constantly hunting for currency, because as soon as it was possible to buy all the scarce, as well as modern equipment in the west. Sheer window dressing for foreigners, and socialist world states are more important for their cookies - while they stand in lines and meet each other. When you spend money to support everyone and at the same time earn a minimum - bankruptcy inevitably happened in the USSR in the 80s.
    1. SOVIET UNION 2 5 October 2019 00: 32 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      << permanent shortage: materials, food, equipment and civilian consumer goods is a confirmation of this, >> Is this about modern Russia? Note that one to one! << modern equipment in the west. Continuous window dressing for foreigners, and their cookie >>
      1. Vadim237 5 October 2019 01: 24 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        Is this about modern Russia? This is about the USSR. In Russia, window dressing for foreigners is not showing what we have in reality.
    2. Campanella 8 October 2019 09: 32 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      What rubbish you have on your head. If it were like you write, then you would not be. The West, of course, earned a lot))) Almost all my life I robbed the colonies and killed people your effective West, created concentration camps, not Stalin invented them, but your West! And you worship this humane system. And now the West is engaged in the sale of children .. civilized! Huh? You are healthy?
  • Vadim237 4 October 2019 13: 48 New
    • 4
    • 13
    -9
    "Is there a bright future for capitalism for Russia? Honestly, I can hardly believe it." The author go to DPRK there Juche socialism - the same window dress for foreigners that was in the USSR, a world closed to any external information full of scarcity, and there is also a hunt for currency.
    1. SOVIET UNION 2 5 October 2019 00: 37 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      After the collapse of the USSR, where did they build cool capitalism? And the Americans there put their paw! These are Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and Syria with territories under the control of ISIS. Here ISIS carried a new order. How did territories with this order explode economically?
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Radikal 4 October 2019 20: 31 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4

    The Kremlin chatterbox and dreamer Mikhail Sergeyevich only completed what was started. Friendship with a deadly enemy ultimately led to the death of the Soviet Union.

    He is not a dreamer, and not a talker - he is a demagogue, a coward, henpecked, and a criminal! The measure to him is the Highest !!! sad
    1. SOVIET UNION 2 5 October 2019 00: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And be in power strong-willed Dzhokhar Dudaev or another strong-willed? Dudaev pursued the same policy as Gorbachev. Simply, the republic was smaller than the territory of the USSR. And so very actively collaborated with the West. No less than Gorbachev and Ukrainians.
  • armata_armata 5 October 2019 08: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Capitalism is doomed. He survived his appointment, becoming a cancer of humanity, an absolute evil that Russia needs to part with, and the sooner the better.

    There is no one to doom him, then if the PRC is bent, then the world will descend into a new era of the Middle Ages, but not feudal, but capitalist
    The development that takes place in the 20th and 21st centuries due to the opposition of the poles is completely stopped (as well as space exploration after the collapse of the USSR), the powers that be are adjusted by the people in power and such a system will reign for more than one century
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Campanella 5 October 2019 12: 08 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Good correct article.
    Russia really has no place in the capitalist sandbox. Because there is not much sand and space. You need to build your own sandbox, if you want to play)))
  • Basarev 7 October 2019 21: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If the revival of socialism is possible, then the opposite is also possible: Russia will overthrow the United States and will itself lead the capitalist system. This is another option for the bright future of Russia under capitalism.
    1. Vadim237 7 October 2019 23: 56 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      This is vryatli, Russia has only one way for further development in capitalism, a difficult but possible way.
    2. Campanella 8 October 2019 09: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I do not see capitalism as a bright future; it is a myth that has been instilled into the fragile brains of Russians.
      But elements of a market economy are needed for the stable operation of socialism.
  • Pavel57 7 October 2019 22: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Alas, the Stalinist system generated both Khrushchev, and Brezhnev, and all the rest. So she concealed potential flaws in herself.
    1. Campanella 8 October 2019 09: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There are no perfect systems. Personnel policy is the second important condition after the idea.
      1. Pavel57 8 October 2019 10: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This is not a personnel policy, but the principle of forming elites.
        1. Campanella 8 October 2019 11: 16 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          It is politics, because the principle simplifies and makes the system incapable. Politics is a symbiosis and a balance of different approaches leading to the same goal.
          1. Pavel57 8 October 2019 11: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The damage of the red project was precisely that the national elites did not form, which led to the desire of the elite (unfinished elite) to be integrated into the western elite, and was deceived. And we have the pleasure to observe the consequences for the country on our own skin.
            1. Campanella 8 October 2019 12: 42 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              I agree, the Soviet elite was clearly not up to par. It is difficult to blame everything on Stalin, but it is obvious that his fault was also there. To build a living new whole state is extremely difficult. I hope that the experience of the USSR will be taken into account in the future.
  • wooja 9 October 2019 04: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    another agitation ...., some appeals and slogans ... Capitalism is another ism Marxism, in itself, has no value other than a slogan, but as Freud said, even bad literature and music make sense ..., K Unfortunately, Soviet-style socialism was not very viable, moreover, it was a side effect of the construction and development of state-monopoly capitalism as the basis for building socialism and communism, in the long term ...., but as an idea to revise the existing world order, it was very good, but unfortunately the ruling circles of the former union (including the Stalinist circle) were not the best politicians and even more than mediocre businessmen. Stalin was right ... he died without the theory of the USSR, but capitalism lives ... ... ...
    1. Pavel57 9 October 2019 09: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Another point to note is that the Red Project was essentially a by-product of one of the Western projects. Hence its logical development and its obvious return to the bosom of the West.
  • Stalnov I.P. 9 October 2019 12: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For the development of the country we need honest, professional people who love their country and respect their people. While there are none.