Peskov answered the question about the possibility of publishing transcripts of conversations between Putin and Trump

Journalists asked the Russian president’s spokesman whether the Kremlin was ready to publish a transcript of conversations between Russian and US leaders. Recall that in the camp of the Democratic Party of the United States of America they previously demanded that Donald Trump and his administration publish decryptions of his conversations with Vladimir Putin. Such demands were made to Trump after the President of the United States published a transcript of a telephone conversation with Vladimir Zelensky.

RIA News cites a statement by Dmitry Peskov on this issue.

According to the head of the Kremlin’s press service, such a publication is possible, but only by mutual agreement of the parties.

Peskov noted that Russia did not intervene and has no right to interfere in the political processes that are taking place in the United States. Thus, Dmitry Peskov made it clear that he was not going to publish the recordings of Trump and Putin’s conversations unilaterally, if only because in the USA they could themselves declare in the usual manner for them that this was “interference in American affairs.”

At the same time, Dmitry Peskov added that, in fact, diplomatic practice does not provide for such publications.

Earlier, supporters of Trump, whom the Democrats are trying to put pressure on deciphering the negotiations, noted that in this case, representatives of the Democratic Party need to expose all their negotiations with representatives of foreign authorities, including the negotiations of Joe Biden when he was US Vice President with the then leadership of Ukraine.

Comments

[parkello]

they are trying to rip up the tramp and gobble up Putin ... they will break their teeth, however.

[Greg Miller]

Trump is a threat to the US Democratic Party, but Putin is not. And therefore no one will "gnaw" and "devour" Putin in the United States ...

[parkello]

in the states they are trying to crack Trump, and with Putin they dream of sorting out Russia itself. dear swimmer. and therefore they will let down all the dogs that have not yet been let down upon him. they are liberoids and Mensheviks (in the sense of not revolutionaries there are Socialist-Revolutionaries and Trotskyists, but those whose party is little supported), so they need any reason. publish a dialogue ... based on what right? curiosity? it’s clear that they will be looking for something to cling to.

[Kronos]

Let honest people publish nothing to hide

[Lexus]

honest people have nothing to hide

Snag, as I understand it, we have just all the information about the "honest people" classified. But ordinary people were confronted with the fact that "the leadership has the right" to eavesdrop, peep and sniff.

[Kronos]

I agree the bourgeois will always buy special rights

[Lexus]

You don't have to go far, there are almost all cool cars with the sign "Disabled" in paid parking lots.

[Svarog]

Earlier, supporters of Trump, whom the Democrats are trying to put pressure on deciphering negotiations, noted that in this case, representatives of the Democratic Party need to expose all their negotiations with representatives of foreign authorities

It’s hard for me alone to imagine that in our country any of the parties could put pressure on the Russian president? In general, it would be interesting to listen to what they agree there ..

[The popuas]

We have everything kneeling, it is impossible on the upper bark even if it deserves it.

[Lexus]

Rather, they will hang collars on mere mortals.

[dauria]

In general, it would be interesting to listen to what they agree there ..

Diplomacy is dead. The next step is a live TV broadcast from the president's bedroom. And from the toilet. It’s interesting. Suddenly, something "anti-democratic".

[Evdokim]

Quote: dauria

The next step is a live TV broadcast from the president's bedroom. And from the toilet. It’s interesting. Suddenly, something "anti-democratic".

Yeah, on-line broadcast, like "White House 2" - squabbles, farting, scandals, and live layoffs.

[carstorm 11]

these are still flowers. they completely broke the system. so why should the presidents meet and talk about something serious if their conversation will be known to everyone tomorrow? now they will stupidly ignore each other and everyone from this will certainly not be well. those who believe that diplomacy is dying are right. the way it is. well, it’s wildness asking the president to publish what he is talking to others about. if they are printed without our consent, consider the world one step closer to disaster.

[syndicalist]

Quote: carstorm 11

these are still flowers. they completely broke the system. so why should the presidents meet and talk about something serious if their conversation will be known to everyone tomorrow? now they will stupidly ignore each other and everyone from this will certainly not be well. those who believe that diplomacy is dying are right. the way it is. well, it’s wildness asking the president to publish what he is talking to others about. if they are printed without our consent, consider the world one step closer to disaster.

Stupidity is complete. On the contrary, international activity with openness will only increase. Anyway, what should they actually hide? How do they share our grandmas? Why should we trust them if so far not a single politician has escaped a scandal? I went into politics, so I must be ready to open all my ins and outs. The world is approaching this sooner or later, but there will be complete openness.

[Major Yurik]

Quote: dauria

In general, it would be interesting to listen to what they agree there ..

Diplomacy is dead. The next step is a live TV broadcast from the president's bedroom. And from the toilet. It’s interesting. Suddenly, something "anti-democratic".

In, exactly, and agreements with the Yankees, if any, to sign with sympathetic ink, so that signatures would disappear from daylight if some regular odd president from mattress opens a document to be revised or canceled!

[Edik]

Quote: dauria

It’s interesting. Suddenly, something "anti-democratic".

Al spot what

[Dietmar]

Now so: no calls, met in the woods, frayed, parted. The translators, if any, shot themselves.

[not main]

Quote: Dietmar

Now so: no calls, met in the woods, frayed, parted. The translators, if any, shot themselves.

Hardly! Most likely, the translators will be "cleaned up" with the help of "cleaners"! In general, this is sarcasm.

[carstorm 11]

but do you think this is bad? that in the bipartisan system, one of the parties, instead of working for several years, has only been doing that the president is wrinkling? _))) you certainly excuse me but it's a circus) and why do you need to know what they are talking about? here for what purpose? because you want to? well, let's at the same time lay out the transcripts of the meeting of defense ministers and intelligence representatives too. this pandora's box did not need to be opened. it will come to everyone very soon.

[Edik]

Quote: Svarog

It’s hard for me alone to imagine that in our country any of the parties could put pressure on the Russian president?

It is such a policy, not everyone is given the opportunity to understand (imagine).

Quote: Svarog

In general, it would be interesting to listen to what they agree there ..

It’s clear what !! How to fool your brother

[Ural-4320]

Because our parties are toothless. At least one has support from the people? All voting is based on the principle: "Well, can they bring order?" The people themselves do not trust any of these people "chosen by the people".

[Edik]

Quote: Ural-4320

Yes, because we have toothless parties. At least one has popular support?

Someone forced the people to vote like that? The people themselves vote and then others who

Quote: Ural-4320

does not trust any of these "chosen by the people" people

Outraged

[Ural-4320]

For, so the point "against all" is long gone. Failure to appear for voting gives an opportunity to register votes. So they choose the lesser of 2 evils.

[Nycomed]

That's right, such veschi can be done only with the consent of the other side. These are the rules of elementary ethics and decency.

[Botanologist]

Quote: Nycomed

such veschi can only be done with the consent of the other party

Such things cannot be done. Generally. The talk of the presidents is not a show with Malakhov, not a reason for political debate. This is the death of politics. You’ll still broadcast on YouTube.

[syndicalist]

. This is the death of politics.

If by politics we mean conspiracy, deceit, bribery, fraud behind the backs of the people, then such a policy will really die. It will be replaced by an open, honest policy in which everyone can see who is hu.

[Botanologist]

Quote: syndicalist

It will be replaced by an open, honest policy in which everyone can see who is hu

Will you publish a conversation about a new military base in Vesuela? in Cuba? Rebel Support

[syndicalist]

That is precisely so that there are no military bases and support for the rebels (on either side) and full openness is needed.

[Botanologist]

You believe so much in fairy tales

[Kurare]

Such pressure from the Democratic Party became possible only because the Republicans themselves, i.e. party members of Trump, sharpening a tooth on him. He is an upstart and should not have become a Republican candidate.

Correctly GDP says that it is their internal showdown. Let them bite and have already become the laughing stock of steel.

[Dym71]

Quote: Kurare

because the Republicans themselves, i.e. party members of Trump, sharpening a tooth on him.

Rather like this:
When there is no agreement in the comrades,
In the mood their business will not go,
And it will not come out of it, only flour. (with)

[Kurare]

... only the fable ended with the cart not being pulled out, and here the whole world was being dragged into a swamp!

[HAM]

So who will talk with the person who will spread the essence of the conversation to everyone? to gossip, even if you don't lie a little from yourself .... "what two know, knows _______!"

[Cube123]

Quote: HAM

So who will talk with the person who will spread the essence of the conversation to everyone? to gossip, even if you don't lie a little from yourself .... "what two know, knows _______!"

Especially if it guarantees something at 1000%. Usually this means that he will not execute even one.

[gabonskijfront]

The second consecutive is not a system president in the United States (Abama, no matter what anyone says, is not a child of the system). So the system is dying, and that America that we knew will never be.

[Cube123]

Quote: gabonskijfront

The second consecutive is not a system president in the United States (Abama, no matter what anyone says, is not a child of the system). So the system is dying, and that America that we knew will never be.

You are wrong. Read:
https://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/2499929.html
Genealogy: Are All But One US Presidents Relatives?

"To my surprise I found out that all US presidents (including Barack Obama) with the exception of Martin Van Buren are descendants of King John (John) Landless. He is the brother of King Richard the “Lion” Heart, he is the king with whom, according to legend, Robin Hood fought.

Among other things, they are all related to each other by distant and close relatives. If you believe Wikipedia, then Obama is generally one of the coolest in terms of relatives. He is a descendant of Brian Boru (King of Ireland), Edward I (King of England, John's grandson) and William I (King of Scotland). "

“It should be noted right away that, unlike the overwhelming majority of African Americans, there is not a drop of the blood of American black slaves in the veins of Barack Obama, but there is a lot of royal blood. 1607) and Martha Eltonhead (1684-5), through whom Barack Obama is a descendant of the King of Scotland William I (1628 - 1689), King of England Edward I (1143 - 1214), who, in turn, were the descendants of Yaroslav the Wise (1239 - 1307). Also among the ancestors of Barack Obama is the King of England Alfred the Great (978 - 1054) and even the King of the Franks Charlemagne. "

It's just that he is not a child of the system that the Democrats tell about.

[Masha]

Publicity! And again, publicity! she is so !!!

[Evdokim]

Quote: Masha

Publicity!

In-in, then acceleration, perestroika, etc. .. They are that from the Democrats to the Communists overstepped.

[cniza]

Do you think they will soon have their own "Gorbachev"?

[Masha]

I wish! Let them have their own "Gorbachev"!

[cniza]

It’s better to have two at once, so that it does not drag out for a long time.

[rocket757]

Diplomatic culture ??? They didn’t hear about this in stripes .... however, they forgot about this in the old geyrop, some of them! The costs of liber-dermocratic raskoryachok. Here they are, what else to take from them? Everything entrusted or with chapter ......

[Geo]

I would love to read

[Cube123]

Quote: Geo

I would love to read

I think you will have such an opportunity. Fifty years later

[Private-K]

Why is it RF "has no right interfere in the political processes that are taking place in the United States "? (c) Peskov. What kind of curtsy with bowing?