Emperor Peter III. Way to the throne

71
So, on February 5 1742 the Crown Duke of Holstein-Gottorp and Schleswig, Karl Peter Ulrich arrived in St. Petersburg. Here he converted to Orthodoxy, received a new name - Pyotr Fedorovich, the title of Grand Duke and was appointed heir to the throne of the Russian Empire.


Portrait of the Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich. Type G.Kh. Groot. Not earlier than 1740's.




The most curious thing is that all the historians who describe the events of those years use the same sources. However, as if under hypnosis of the "Catherine tradition", most of them carefully choose from the memoirs and memoirs of contemporaries only facts that should confirm the established opinion about this Grand Duke and Emperor. Or they freely interpret in the same vein the facts testifying more likely in favor of Peter III. They treat other characters much more condescendingly. Here are some examples.

The French diplomat Claude Rühler in his Notes tells of a resourceful guard who says a senior official passing by him: “Who doesn’t recognize you? You illuminate all the places that you pass through” (you understand that the guard could not help recognizing, even in twilight, silhouette of a protected person).

For this simple flattery, the soldiers received a gold coin. One can imagine what a hail of ridicule and derogatory reviews would follow in the comments of historians if it were about Peter III. But Catherine turned out to be a lover of such compliments, and therefore this episode is interpreted as evidence of "the soldiers’ love for Mother Empress. "

And here is evidence that one of the Russian emperors (named Peter), at the sight of a cockroach, shied away and even fainted. Can you imagine what flurry of gnarliness would rise if this Peter were "third in a row"? But we are talking about Peter I, and therefore the fact passes through the category of "quirks of genius."

Another comparison of these emperors: one of them plays the violin very well (almost professionally), the other - beats the marching “fractions” on the drum. But, since Peter I is an amateur drummer, he’s not a soldier at all - how could you even think that? And Pikul will write about Peter III: he played along to Frederick II "on his stupid violinist."

But who is it about?

"Two of the favorites closest to him, promising to petition him for money, were severely beaten from his own hands; he took the money from them and continued to treat them with the same mercy."

(C. Rühler.)

About Peter III. Do you think the author admires? Do not wait! Firstly, it was written when the "Catherine legend" was already created and established, the French encyclopedists in correspondence with the "Semiramis of the North" consisted. Secondly, accustomed to the fact that everything is sold and bought at the royal courts, the courteous Frenchman comments on the emperor’s act as follows:
"A wonderful combination of justice and inveterate evil, greatness and stupidity was evident at his court."


And everyone happily repeats these words, pronouncing “justice” with a tongue twister and emphasizing “stupidity”.

Intellectual level of Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich


Often you have to read that the not too educated (to put it mildly) Empress Elizabeth was horrified by the level of development and education of the boy who came to Russia. What can I say? If she asked him about Parisian fashions and new ballroom dancing, then Karl Peter Ulrich could, of course, "fail the entrance exam."

But Peter's mentor in the secular sciences, academician J. Shtelin, wrote that the heir has high learning abilities and excellent memory - "excellent, to the smallest detail."

Emperor Peter III. Way to the throne

Portrait of J. Shtelin according to the original G.F. Schmidt


Soon Peter already "knew firmly the main foundations of Russian stories, could count on the fingers of all sovereigns from Rurik to Peter I "(Shtelin). In Russian, Peter spoke tolerably well after a year (the statement of N.I. Panin that" Peter almost did not speak Russian "is false and It serves the purpose of denigrating the deposed emperor.) But Catherine II, who loved to emphasize her patriotism at every opportunity, did not learn to speak plain Russian - a terrible German accent remained with her until the end of her life, you shouldn’t even speak about numerous mistakes in writing But she survived the murdered husband on 34 th Yes, the heir brought up in Kiel, of course, could not become Russian overnight. Catherine II didn’t become Russian, contrary to a widespread misconception. The difference between the spouses was that Peter felt like “a German in Russian service," Catherine a German who conquered Russia, hence the wild expenditures for the maintenance of her Court, and some crazy, perplexing disproportion, gifts for the “nights of love”, so that any favorite in a few days became a "cutoff". This also explains the transformation of the vast majority of the population of a foreign country for her into disempowered slaves, who had to pay for the "beautiful life" of Catherine and her favorites.

But back to Peter and his training in Russia. He preferred the humanities to the exact sciences, often asking Shtelin to replace a lesson in history, geography, or the study of the Latin language with a lesson in mathematics. But, most of all, he was attracted to fortification and artillery. According to the inventory of the heir’s library, books in German, French, Italian and English were stored in it, including the first French edition of Voltaire’s works. The book, printed in Russian, was only one, but what a! The first and only issue of the St. Petersburg scientific journal "A Brief Description of the Comments of the Academy of Sciences." There were no books in Latin, to which Peter had been abhorred from childhood.

Everyone knows about the great interest that Peter has shown since childhood to everything related to military affairs and the army. However, in St. Petersburg, the Grand Duke learned to play the violin and, according to Shtelin, could be a partner of professional musicians (although he sometimes faked in some, especially difficult, places). At least once a week large concerts were held with his participation. Memoirist A. Bolotov, who is extremely critical of Peter, also admits that he "played the violinist ... quite well and fluently." Then the heir "became the owner of a valuable collection of cremons of Cremona, Amati, Steiner and other famous masters" (Shtelin). And in 1755, Peter also opened a singing and ballet school in Oranienbaum to train Russian artists. So the stories of the enemies of the heir about the hopeless soldierhood of Pyotr Fedorovich, to put it mildly, are not entirely true

The systematic and regular training of the heir was hindered by the eccentric Elizabeth. The Empress demanded that Peter be present at all court balls and festivals (and they very often took place at night) and accompany her on trips to Moscow, Kiev, and for pilgrimage to various monasteries.

The scientific monk Simon Todorsky was appointed the mentor of Peter in Orthodoxy (he later taught the bride of the Grand Duke - the future Catherine II).


Simon Todorsky


With this teacher, the heir led real, and very emotional, theological disputes - literally for every dogma, which is also evidence of a good education and high erudition of the boy. But his wife, Ekaterina Alekseevna, did not argue with the mentor - either the level of education did not allow, or she was afraid that the teacher would speak badly of her under Elizabeth.

Probably, these disputes of Peter with his spiritual mentor served as a source of gossip that the heir intends to introduce Lutheranism in Russia. We are not aware of the content of these discussions, but they claim that very similar thoughts about reforming the Orthodox Church (and not faith) were expressed at that time by M.V. Lomonosov, whom no one has accused of betraying Orthodoxy. And we know about Lomonosov’s ideas: they are stated in his letters to the favorite Elizabeth II. Shuvalov. What did Lomonosov offer? Not to limit widowers in the number of marriages, to ban tonsure of people who are still able to have children, to baptize babies not in cold but in warm water. In addition, given the difficult climate of Russia, he proposed shifting the time of Lent to late spring or early summer, as "fasts were not established for suicide by harmful foods, but to abstain from excess."

The marriage of the heir


On 7 in May 1745, Peter, who had come of age, was officially declared the sovereign Duke of Holstein. And in August of that year, the wedding of Peter and the German Princess Sofia Frederica Augusta took place. Anhalt-Zerbst, received the baptism of the Russian name Ekaterina Alekseevna.


Antoine Peng. Portrait of Catherine II in her youth


From the point of view of Elizabeth, the main advantage of this candidate was her ingenuity: the empress hoped that the grateful girl would become a good wife and obedient daughter-in-law. Having come to power as a result of a palace coup, she was terribly afraid of a new conspiracy. Therefore, Elizabeth did not trust the heir to the throne, which she removed from any public affairs and, in fact, kept under house arrest (later, Catherine II would not trust her son in the same way). And therefore, Elizabeth rejected very interesting options for marrying Peter to a French or Saxon princess (whose father was also the Polish king), and "wrote out" to him, on the recommendation of Frederick II, a seedy German woman, the daughter of one of the king’s generals. And, as we know, she was cruelly mistaken in her calculations. The future Catherine II was grateful not to her, but to Frederick II. Here is what she wrote to him on the eve of the wedding from Moscow:
"Be sure that I will consider it glorious for myself only when I have the opportunity to convince you of my gratitude and devotion."


So, the heir to the Russian throne, Pyotr Fedorovich, only openly admires the talents of Frederick II (and he is not alone, Frederick is a very bright personality, a strong and extraordinary person, he has many admirers throughout Europe). And his wife, at the same time, sends secret letters to Frederick II, in which she gives the obligation to "be grateful." Which is worse, worse, more dangerous?

Peter and Catherine were familiar with 1739, and even had family ties - Sofia Frederick Augustus was a second cousin to Karl Peter Ulrich. In the first version of "Notes" by Catherine, about meeting Petr in 1739 (in Germany) it is written:
“For the first time I saw the Grand Duke, who was really handsome, amiable and well-mannered. Miracles were told about the eleven-year-old boy.”


About any boob and degenerate, as you see, not even a word. But, in the edited version, we read:
"Relatives said among themselves that the young duke was inclined to drunkenness, that his close ones did not allow him to get drunk at the table."


Let me remind you that we are talking about an 11-year-old boy. Which, according to the old Empress who edited her Notes, was already a complete alcoholic at this age.


Wedding portrait of Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich and Grand Duchess Catherine Alexeyevna (future Peter III and Catherine II). 1745 G. Attributed to G.K. Groot


The couple turned out to be very different people, the relationship between them did not work out. In her "Notes" Catherine did not hide that from the very beginning, she dreamed of one thing - to become the autocratic empress of Russia. Two people stood on the road to this goal - the ruling Empress Elizabeth and her nephew, the rightful heir to the throne, the husband of Catherine. Yelizaveta Petrovna had to reckon with and respect decency, but her “liveliness of character”, nevertheless, made her through Chancellor Bestuzhev enter into a risky relationship with the British envoy Williams (Elizabeth for some time was even close to sending her daughter-in-law from the country, saved her birth as an heir). But her husband Ekaterina Alekseevna, from the very beginning defiantly despised, and after the death of Elizabeth, immediately plotted, costing the emperor life. In order to justify herself and denigrate her husband in the face of descendants, Catherine created the myth of the emperor who hated everything in Russia. She presented herself as a meek sufferer, forced for many years to bear the unjust insults of an always drunken fool-husband. Which, moreover, was never a full-fledged man (it was necessary to somehow explain the presence of the "exemplary wife" of so many lovers). In particular, she claimed that, in her development, her husband was a child, and, after the wedding, she spent the night with him not in bed, but playing tin soldiers, remaining a virgin for either 5 or 9 years. However, written in French, a note by Peter addressed to Catherine came to our time:
"Madam, please do not worry that you will have to spend this night with me, because the time has come to deceive me."


It is written in 1746, a year after the wedding, Peter reproaches his wife for infidelity. What virginity has been preserved for 9 years!

Intimate relationships between spouses continued, at least until the beginning of the 1754 year, because before the birth of Pavel, Ekaterina became pregnant several times (these pregnancies ended in miscarriages). After the beginning of relations with Sergey Saltykov (who became the first of Catherine’s many favorites), the next pregnancy ended, finally, with the birth of her first child, Pavel (September 20 of 1754 of the year). Peter did not doubt the legality of the origin of this boy. In a letter to the king of Sweden (with which, incidentally, Count Saltykov was sent to Stockholm), announcing the birth of Paul, Peter calls him "my son." But the next child - daughter Anna, born of Catherine in 1757, he does not call “his” in a letter to the same addressee.

About the birth of Anna, Peter responded as follows:
"God knows where my wife gets her pregnancy from. I don’t know too much if this is my baby and whether I should take it personally."


Thus, Peter was sure that Paul was his son. But he was very doubtful that he was Anna's father.

The new title of Pavel granted to him by Emperor Peter III also speaks volumes: he became not just the Grand Duke, but the first prince in Russia - in France this title corresponded to “dauphin”, in Sweden - “crown prince”. Recall that, according to the law established by Peter I, the emperor was free to appoint a successor himself, not paying attention to the degree of relationship. Peter III indicated in advance to his subjects who would be their next emperor.


Portrait of Grand Duke Pavel Petrovich with arapon. Painting by an unknown artist


Catherine did not hide these pregnancies. But the pregnancy from Grigory Orlov hid it from everyone, and the birth was secret. This suggests that by this time she had not had intimacy with her husband for a long time, and, therefore, it was not possible to marry a child for her son Peter.

So, Peter Fedorovich himself had no doubts about the origin of Paul. But the court gossips attributed the birth of the first-born of the grand-ducal family to the “love of zeal” of Count Sergei Saltykov (and Catherine in her Notes gives very serious reasons to think about it).


Alleged portrait of S. Saltykov


Pikul in the novel "Feather and Sword" mistakenly calls the father of Pavel Stanislav Augustus Ponyatovsky, who took a place in the bed of the Grand Duchess later - in 1755.


Lumpy I.-B. Older. Portrait of Stanislav Augustus Poniatowski


Apparently, Anna became the daughter of Poniatowski (she died at the age of two). And Peter at that time was carried away by the maid of honor of Catherine - Elizaveta Vorontsova, who was younger than him by 11 years.


Portrait of Elizabeth Romanovna Vorontsova brush unknown master


Elizaveta Petrovna and her relationship with the heir


As for Elizabeth, who herself had called Peter to Russia, she immediately disliked her nephew, brought up in a foreign German environment. And this was felt by the court sneaks, who, in order to please the empress, told all kinds of nasty things about the heir. Elizabeth listened to these gossip quite favorably, and the heir to the Russian throne unexpectedly turned into an outcast in the royal palace, and maintaining a close relationship with him was dangerous for her career.

Peter did not like his aunt (and there was a reason) and despised her greedy favorites, insignificant court sneaks, ministers, whose venality was known to everyone. Elizabeth, her favorites, toadies and corrupt ministers claimed that the heir does not love and despises Russia. A formula that is very familiar and convenient for the rulers of any country, isn't it? If you don’t like “His Majesty” and the many “Highlands” and “Excellencies” who are wandering around him, it means not a patriot, and a citizen is worthless.

Unlike his wife Catherine, who, if necessary, could be flattering, obedient and obedient, Peter did not consider it necessary to engage in pretense. He, the only one, refused to dress up as a woman at Elizabeth's strange balls, where men were supposed to be in women's dresses, and ladies had to wear men's suits. Participation for the courtiers was mandatory, for failure to appear, they paid a large fine. Catherine, with pleasure, took part in these masquerades, as she believed that she was wearing a military uniform.

Suffering from a lack of love and attention, Peter yearned for his native Holstein, inadvertently expressing regrets about his fate, which had thrown him to a distant land where he was a stranger and no one needed. The court spies informed the empress about these moods of the heir, adding a lot from themselves. A vivid example of such slander is the memoirs of A.T. Bolotov, who writes that Peter, allegedly kneeling in front of the portrait of Frederick II, called him his sovereign. This lie is replicated in many historical works and near-historical novels. But Bolotov’s innocent reservation that he himself didn’t see anything like it, just “talk about it”, remains “behind the scenes”.

Chancellor of the Empire A.P. Bestuzhev actively traded the interests of Russia, taking money from the British and Austrians (involving Catherine in her dirty business). To divert attention from himself and his ward, he, at the same time
"inspired the Empress Elizabeth, as if Peter Fedorovich did not seize the throne, and contributed a lot to his removal from participation in Russian state affairs."


As a result of the constant denunciations of such "well-wishers," Elizabeth became increasingly hardened against her nephew. As we already said, he was in fact under "house arrest", not having the right to move freely - literally everyone had to ask permission from a suspicious aunt. Here, for example, an excerpt from the letter of the Grand Duke to the favorite of Elizabeth II. Shuvalov:
"Dear sir, I asked you for permission to go to Oranienbaum, but I see that my request was unsuccessful, I’m very ill and spleen, I ask you in the name of God, persuade Her Majesty to let me go to Oranienbaum. "



A.P. Losenko. I.I. Shuvalov


At the same time, Elizabeth also dared to accuse him of insufficient love and ingratitude. Naturally, Peter, whenever possible, avoided communicating with such a “benefactor” and her sneaks, becoming more and more distant from the “big” court, which only aggravated the situation. But the Grand Duke established good relations with the “attendants”, which his aunt didn’t like, who instructed the Obergofmeister of the court’s heir NN Choglakov to stop “games with rangers and soldiers ... all kinds of jokes with pages, lackeys and other worthless people " At the same time, Elizabeth herself freely communicated with singers, maids, breakers, lackeys and soldiers, and her addiction to English beer "was condemned as a manifestation of the meanness of origin." Apparently, deep down, she knew that she was behaving inappropriately, but did not want to change her habits. And, in compensation, she demanded that Peter become the "real" emperor.

After the death of Choglokov, it was entrusted not to anyone to look after the heir, but to the head of the Secret Chancellery, A.I. Shuvalov. Elizabeth demanded from him "reports on the behavior of the Grand Duke; she was enraged to learn that he was absent from Pyotr Fedorovich when he carried out maneuvers in the vicinity of Oranienbaum with his detachment."

It is curious that the other "wards" A.I. Shuvalov, about whom he also sent reports to Elizabeth, was at that time the "Shlisselburg Prisoner" - the legitimate Russian emperor John Antonovich, who was now ordered to call everywhere Grigory. Very significant, isn't it?


Count A.I. Shuvalov, head of the Secret Chancellery


The Empress was not afraid in vain: there is evidence that far from all were delighted with the endless balls and more and more new dresses of "merry Elizabeth." The country did not have an independent foreign policy, affairs fell into disarray and decline, people were impoverished, and many furtively began to glance towards the heir, hoping with hope for a new reign. So, the soldiers of the Preobrazhensky Regiment (whose colonel and chief was the Empress herself) once declared to Peter:

"God grant that you would rather be our sovereign, so that we do not be under the rule of a woman."


And such cases, which were immediately reported to the empress, were not isolated. So Elizabeth’s suspicions were not unfounded, she just looked in the wrong direction - she was afraid of a conspiracy from the side of Peter, who was always loyal to her, losing sight of the schemer Catherine.

Bestuzhev suggested that Catherine become her official co-ruler of Peter (but she wanted more). A lieutenant colonel of the life-cuirassier regiment M.I. In December 1761, Dashkov suggested that she remove from power both the seriously ill Elizabeth and her heir, Peter (but Catherine was pregnant at that time from Grigory Orlov, and did not dare).


M.I. Dashkov, husband of Ekaterina Dashkova. Unknown artist, 1760-ies.


Only once, after Bestuzhev’s resignation and arrest, did the clouds gather over Catherine’s head. But he understood the old cunning: for "simple theft", of course, they would not pat on the head, but for "politics" - right away, they would drag him to the Secret Chancellery, on the rack. And then, if she survives, she will not die from torture - to hard labor. And so, during interrogations about Catherine, he kept silent.

The empress began to treat the heir especially badly after 1755. At that time, she repeatedly publicly spoke in hindsight about him, including with foreign diplomats. Elizabeth jealously dismissed the heir from all state affairs; Petr Fedorovich’s participation in the Conference at the Highest Court (advisory body) created in 1756 was purely formal in nature, no one listened to his opinion; in 1757, he left her composition. The only case when Peter received at least some independent position was the appointment of his Director General of the Ground Gentry Corps (in February 1759). The position for a figure of this level is low, but the activity of Pyotr Fedorovich in this post proves that gossip about his mental inferiority has no basis. Under the leadership of Peter, the barracks of the building were expanded and reconstructed (now 5-6 people began to live in one room, instead of the previous 10), the food of the pupils and their uniforms were improved, a printing house was organized in which the books necessary for study began to be printed - in Russian, German and French.

On 25 of December 1761, Empress Elizabeth died, and Peter, after almost twenty years of rather humiliating life in Russia, finally was able to begin to realize his long-planned plans. The reign of Peter III, not the "obscene" world with Prussia and the 192 decrees and laws published by him, will be discussed in the next article.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    1 October 2019 07: 17
    It is unlikely that a simple change of the minus sign to plus (Petya - nyasha, Lizka and Katka - kaki) will triumph the truth. She, as always, is in the middle.
    1. VLR
      +3
      1 October 2019 07: 30
      The negative character traits of Peter III will also be discussed.
  2. +5
    1 October 2019 07: 30
    The personality of Peter 3 remains in the shadows, but he ruled at the turn of the era
    it's good that attention is paid
  3. +7
    1 October 2019 07: 57
    A very interesting look at Peter III. I will wait for the continuation. I hope the analysis of his death will be? Orlov or Schwanwich?
    1. VLR
      +4
      1 October 2019 08: 30
      There is also a third candidate. There will be a very interesting, even topical article "Emperor Peter III. Conspiracy".
  4. -5
    1 October 2019 08: 06
    and “discharged” him, on the recommendation of Frederick II, a seedy German girl, the daughter of one of the generals of this king. And, as we know, she was severely mistaken in her calculations.

    Should one consider the appearance in Russia of one of the best rulers in the history of the country? The author carries somewhere to the wrong place.
    Everything else is a free retelling of the television series "Ekaterina" 2014-2017.
    1. VLR
      +2
      1 October 2019 08: 15
      Catherine II is "one of the best rulers in the history of the country": read the following article to find out a little more about this empress.
      1. -12
        1 October 2019 08: 45
        in 1762, after the unexpected death of Elizabeth Petrovna, Peter III ascended the Russian throne. This ardent admirer of the Prussian king Frederick the Second refused all of Russia's acquisitions in the course of the won war, including East Prussia.
        In 1762, Emperor Peter III returned the Russian Koenigsberg to the Prussian king

        In addition to it, Russian lands voluntarily surrendered to enemies V. Lenin, M. Gorbachev, if they were damned three times.
        1. +16
          1 October 2019 10: 24
          What Lenin gave back was returned by his "faithful ally" and added. He returned what Nikol the Bloody had missed with "Count Polusakhalinsky".
  5. +8
    1 October 2019 08: 16
    When the predecessor was removed by force, then to prove the legitimacy of their entry into power. predecessor watered thickly with mud.
  6. 0
    1 October 2019 08: 16
    The article is interesting, but the author, in my opinion, of course, idealizes Pyotr Fedorovich too much.
    It is known that there is a negative approach to the personality of Peter III, which is based on the memoirs of Catherine II, Dashkova, and other contemporaries of that era. Peter, of course, was not so weak-witted, as the authors of the memoirs show him, but what were the results of the short reign of this ruler - he surrendered East Prussia, introduced the Prussian order in the army, conceived a ridiculous Danish campaign, began to carry out the same ridiculous church reform, and this not all of his eccentricities. Set up against himself - the army, the guard, the Church, the nobility, the court yard.
    Peter Fedorovich had no chance to stay alive.
    1. VLR
      +4
      1 October 2019 08: 22
      Not certainly in that way:
      Prussia did not pass.
      The army and the nobility did not set up against themselves.
      I set up against myself the corrupted guardsmen (and even not all), the Church (took slaves from the monasteries), the Senate (forced to work), the courtiers - yes.
      Further on this will be discussed in detail and with reason.
      1. -1
        1 October 2019 08: 31
        He enjoyed the trust only of the peasants (belief in a "good" tsar), which was later cleverly used by Pugachev.
        1. VLR
          +1
          1 October 2019 08: 34
          And the nobles were going to put him a golden statue.
          1. -2
            1 October 2019 08: 49
            In those days, the order of succession was determined by the guard, it decided who to reign.
            С Manifesto....., Peter III hurried, removing from the nobility stateth service.
            1. VLR
              +2
              1 October 2019 08: 55
              Yes, I agree on the manifest.
              And with the decision of the guard ... What happened in June 1762 was an incredibly absurd and even some kind of "operetta" conspiracy, probably only the Decembrists acted worse. But it was here that Peter's negative traits manifested themselves. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
              1. -2
                1 October 2019 09: 06
                Catherine was a dodgy female mind, Peter was certainly rustic, which ruined him.
              2. +1
                1 October 2019 16: 17
                probably only the Decembrists acted worse.

                well, worse than the Decembrists, only the Chernigov regiment acted. wink but about the conspiracy to murder Peter's son, Paul, all Petersburg spoke. True, Sablukov notes in his memoirs that it was impossible to make a single opinion out of all the speeches. But this may be the position of such an ostrich, "I see nothing", what do you think? request
                I look forward to continuing. drinks Valery, from your point of view: is Shtelin’s opinion authoritative? nevertheless, this is the opinion of the teacher about the student, practically, a native person. what
                1. VLR
                  +1
                  1 October 2019 16: 40
                  I got the impression that Shtelin is fairly objective. Only he was among those who were embittered on the day of the conspiracy - and, probably, partially guilty of the death of the emperor.
                  1. +1
                    1 October 2019 17: 36
                    and then who didn’t get scared? request Vorontsov, who was put under house arrest? or the seasoned Minich, who immediately proposed a reasonable solution - to sail to the troops in the Baltics? (an interesting fate for a person - twice "supported the losing side" in the struggle for the throne! Yes ) I’m distracted: Vorontsov’s estate (it was near the Leikhtenbergsky Own cottage and cottage, near Oranienbaum, and, naturally, belonged to other owners) was burned in 1917 the massesbefore October! fellow
                    Shtelin - fairly objective

                    his manuals, with which he taught the prince (and at the same time played with him), were interesting. Fortification took place together according to volume mock-ups, and the plan of the first amusing fortress - Yekaterinburg - was also drawn, apparently, together. hi
    2. +3
      1 October 2019 08: 41
      guard
      What the guard was by 1761 is now determined by the abbreviation of organized crime groups.
      1. +1
        1 October 2019 17: 43
        now defined by the gang abbreviation

        just as principled Thomas Dewey defeated Lucky Luciano, so Nikolai Pavlovich shot the last palace coup. fellow By the way, Anton, a film about the Decembrists is coming out soon, "The Union of Salvation". I already understand that this will be a terrible bullshit, but I would go! drinks
        1. +1
          1 October 2019 17: 54
          Director and actors?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +1
              1 October 2019 18: 18
              Thank you Nikolay! I'll see.
              1. +1
                1 October 2019 18: 29
                I said that the estate of Minich was opposite the entrance to the LEMZ? close to me. drinks
  7. -3
    1 October 2019 08: 50
    Elizabeth was not afraid of Karl Ulrich, she was his ashamed and no wonder:
    A large rat hung on a rope stretched from the ceiling. When asked by Catherine what this means, Peter said that the rat had committed a criminal offense, which was severely punished by military laws: she climbed onto a cardboard fortress on the table and ate two sentries from starch. The offender was caught, put on trial in a field court and sentenced to death by hanging.
    Elizabeth was desperate for the character and behavior of her nephew and could not spend a quarter of an hour with him without grief, anger, and even disgust. In her room, when she spoke of him, the empress burst into tears and complained that God had given her such an heir. Not pious reviews of him came off her pious tongue: “Damned nephew”, “my nephew, damn him!”
    Considering for himself a model of the army of Frederick II, Peter tried to learn the manners and habits of the Prussian soldier, began to smoke an exorbitant amount of tobacco and drink an unbearable amount of beer bottles, thinking that without this you can not become a “real brave officer”. Having ascended the throne, Peter rarely lived sober until the evening and sat down at the table, usually drunk.
    Before the accession to Prussia, who sent information about the Russian army to Frederick II during the Seven Years War, Peter became loyal Prussian Minister on the Russian throne IN. Klyuchevsky


    And what did the other great Russian historian S. M. say about him? Soloviev:
    “People who at first wanted and could support the government of Peter ΙΙΙ, make it popular, very soon saw that they were unable to do anything, and looked with despair at the future of the fatherlandheld in the hands of mediocre foreigners and ministers alien sovereignon the eve of the former sworn enemy of Russia

    Russian historian Bilbasov:
    Dumb, stubborn, intemperate, he, becoming an autocrat, was sincerely convinced that the whole world exists solely to satisfy his desires, whims, whims; he lost the ability to think correctly, began to act, like a tyrant, and until the last minute was blinded by his power, he only trusted her, only relied on her ... "

    Prussian envoy to St. Petersburg Baron A. von Mardefeld in the report on the Russian court in 1746:
    “And after a moment you will easily take him for a ten-year-old child who is naughty and disobeys General Repnin, who is generally despised by him. He is inferior to all his evil inclinations. He is stubborn, unyielding, not a stranger to cruelty, a lover of booze and love affairs, and for some time now began to behave like a rude dork. He does not hide disgust, he has something for the Russian nation

    Prussian envoy in St. Petersburg (then Minister of State) Count K.V. Fink von Finkenstein in a report to Frederick II in 1748:
    «He does not shine with either intelligence or character; is childless, speaks incessantly, and his childish conversation, the great sovereign is unworthy, and often very careless; he is resolutely committed to military affairs, but he knows only small things from it; eagerly rants against Russian customs, and sometimes even makes jokes about the rites of the Greek Church; Holstein constantly remembers his duchy, to which she clearly has preference; there is liveliness in it, but I do not dare to call it liveliness of the mind; he is sharp, impatient, inclined to tomfoolery, but he has neither such courtesy nor courtesy, an important person so needed. As far as I know, the only reasonable fun with which he indulges is music; every day for several hours playing with dolls and puppets;


    The opinion of psychiatrists is that Peter III suffered from bipolar disorder with a mild depressive phase
    Turning to the mental state of Peter III, we believe that he refers to third degree degeneration: mental abilities are below average, higher emotions are embryonic, and lower ones reign over the spiritual system of a person. http://www.psychiatry.ru/lib/1/book/83/chapter/25

    1. VLR
      +5
      1 October 2019 09: 00
      I already wrote that ALL historians use the same sources. The difference is only in interpretation. And therefore it is unreasonable to refer even to Solovyov, even to Klyuchevsky, even to Bilbasov. It is also unreasonable to refer to unscrupulous psychiatrists engaged in self-promotion, who, not seeing the "patient", make a diagnosis based on the works of the same biased historians. As for the reviews of contemporaries, for every negative there is a positive one. The only question is which one to use, and which one to put aside, and what assessment to give to this or that fact. At the beginning of the article, I gave examples.
      1. -4
        1 October 2019 10: 09
        Quote: VlR
        I already wrote that ALL historians use the same sources. The difference is only in the interpretation. And therefore refer even to Solovyov, even on Klyuchevsky, even on Bilbasov - is unreasonable

        Wow!belay
        And who is reasonable?

        Isn’t it for the slime-breeding of several emperors of Shtelin? He is clearly a PARTICULAR face, caressed and gifted by a German.

        Who else is your "authority"? "Some Justy? lol
        Quote: VlR
        . Also nunreasonably refer to unscrupulous psychiatrists engaged in self-promotion, who, without seeing the "patient",

        Great Russian historians are "unreasonable", specialists in psychiatry are "unreasonable" ..

        Aren't there many .... "unreasonable"? belay

        So far, in my opinion, they look much more reasonable and convincing.
        1. VLR
          +3
          1 October 2019 10: 22
          No matter how trivial, it is wise to work with the primary sources - the same Shtelin, Rühler, the English envoy Harris, the Prussian envoy Goltz, the secretary of the French embassy Kayyar, the Danish diplomat A. Schumacher and many others. Because all historians worked and work with them. And compilations from Klyuchevsky and Solovyov are made by students in their essays.
          1. -6
            1 October 2019 11: 15
            Quote: VlR
            No matter how trite, it’s wise to work with the primary sources

            To whom you obviously do not belong, but speak, nevertheless, with their categorization. .
            Quote: VlR
            the same Shtelin, Rühler, the English envoy Harris, the Prussian envoy Goltz, the secretary of the French embassy Kayyar, the Danish diplomat A. Schumacher and many others

            The ORIGINS are also given to you: the Prussian envoy to St. Petersburg, Baron A. von Mardefeld, the Prussian envoy to St. Petersburg (then Minister of State) Count K.V. Fink von Finkenstein, Catherine the Great, Panins, Bolotov, Vorontsovs and there are many, many others.
            Quote: VlR
            And compilations from Klyuchevsky and Solovyov are made by students in their essays.

            No, many great scientists and educated people allude to the great Russian scientists Klyuchevsky and Solovyov, for example, Matvey Lyubavsky, rector of Moscow University, academician Yuri Gauthier, corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences Sergey Bakhrushin, and many, many others.

            But even some, still uneducated, students and schoolchildren do not allow themselves to call these scientists .. "Unreasonable".
            1. +2
              1 October 2019 18: 09
              Olgovich, in many respects I agree with you, but let me make a remark: "Catherine the Great, Panins, Bolotov" they are just interested in "casting a shadow over the slab." Further I agree
              1. -2
                2 October 2019 10: 50
                Quote: vladcub
                Olgovich, in many respects I agree with you, but let me make a remark: "Catherine the Great, Panins, Bolotov" they are just interested in "casting a shadow over the slab."

                And the "academician" Shtelin, cited everywhere by the author, caressed and licked by Karl himself, is not an interested person ?!
    2. +3
      1 October 2019 11: 23
      It turns out that it is difficult for a person who finds himself, much more so for years, in a hostile environment, not only to show, but even to maintain the best qualities of his character. Usually become complete cynics and misanthropes.
      The apotheosis of a similar metamorphosis was described by Shakespeare.
      "Good play, in the finale - eight corpses."
      1. +1
        1 October 2019 16: 21
        "Good play, in the finale - eight corpses."

        or "the games are over - with things on the way out." hi
    3. 0
      30 June 2020 14: 39
      Well, of course, for you the best emperor Nicholas 2, whom the people affectionately clicked Bloody
  8. +1
    1 October 2019 08: 52
    In a non-parade portrait, the future Peter III looks completely degenerate

    1. VLR
      +1
      1 October 2019 09: 04
      Honestly, I do not see any signs of degeneration. Though I’m trying now. Replace the hairstyle with a modern one, dress accordingly according to our era - we will see an ordinary young man. Not handsome. and not a freak.
    2. +2
      1 October 2019 12: 43
      A portrait is not a photograph. Each artist brings his vision to the drawing. What I wanted to portray, then portrayed.
    3. +1
      1 October 2019 20: 01
      Quote: Operator

      In a non-parade portrait, the future Peter III looks completely degenerate

      So he does not look like a grand genius.
  9. +1
    1 October 2019 08: 59
    An interesting and fairly detailed article, as well as the previous one. Of course, there are controversial issues, but this is a story, not mathematics.
    1. +1
      1 October 2019 18: 17
      Correctly noticed
  10. -1
    1 October 2019 10: 11
    Probably, these disputes of Peter with his spiritual mentor served as a source of gossip that the heir intends to introduce Lutheranism in Russia.

    This and much more of the "slander" about Peter III should be taken easier than systemic propaganda, for one simple reason - Karl Peter Ulrich was born a German and grew up German for 13 years, and then came to Russia and became the heir to the throne there. Ordinary everyday chauvinism for that time was an absolutely ubiquitous phenomenon, and Russia is no exception. He was born and spent his childhood in a foreign land, while after arriving in his new homeland, he did not become 100% Russified - this is enough for him to start getting dirty at the household level. Little things, little by little. If the newspaper business and freedom of speech were more developed in Russia, he would have become a "star" of cartoons, as, for example, Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria, was for a long time the subject of ridicule and, to put it mildly, dislike from the townsfolk until he won their respect and recognition for their deeds. But this is 100 years later!

    I don't quite share your optimism regarding his Holstein education. I met information that his Kiel teachers were very ... peculiar, and therefore Elizabeth's assessment may be correct at the time of arrival. This does not at all negate Karl Peter Ulrich's ability to learn, success in mathematics and fortification seems to be not denied even by "Ekaterinists", although he met attempts to present it under the sauce "and the tsar is a stupid pedant, since he is fond of such things!"

    In many other ways, I do not share your enthusiastic accents.
    1. +2
      1 October 2019 10: 41
      Quote: arturpraetor
      For that time, ordinary household chauvinism was an absolutely universal phenomenon, and Russia is no exception.

      And not only that time. Starting from Socrates. And in historical retrospect - a holy cause! A striking example is Philip II.
    2. -2
      1 October 2019 11: 19
      Quote: arturpraetor
      He was born and spent his childhood in a foreign land, however, after arriving in their new homeland

      he was born and raised in his homeland, and arrived in a foreign land.

      Which remained for him forever.
      1. +2
        1 October 2019 11: 35
        I spoke from the point of view of the Russians. And for Russia, although he had the blood of the Romanovs due to dynastic ties, that is, claimed to be a Russian, but did not become such, having been born in a foreign country and still remaining a stranger to Russia. We are talking about the same thing with you, only I spoke from the point of view of the "local", and you have the same thing, but from the point of view of "come in large numbers."
      2. 0
        1 October 2019 18: 30
        Ol'govich, you noticed right here. And he himself confirms this: "They dragged me into this accursed Russia, where I must consider myself a state prisoner, while if they left me free, now I would sit on the throne of a civilized people." He PRESIRED Russia and did not try to hide it
      3. +1
        1 October 2019 20: 28
        Quote: Olgovich
        he was born and raised in his homeland, and arrived in a foreign land.
        Which remained for him forever

        Bravo, Olgovich! Exactly so, and no other way. (that rare case when I agree with you all 200%)
        Quote: arturpraetor
        We are talking about the same thing with you, only I spoke from the point of view of the "local", and you have the same thing, but from the point of view of "come in large numbers."

        In this particular case, the point of view of the locals, apparently, was directly proportional to the attitude towards them (local), on the part of the PanAhahil.
  11. +2
    1 October 2019 10: 42
    Well, what, the article is quite in a "trend", belittling the merits of the official Russian rulers and exalting their failed opponents. As they say, the blackening of Russian history "on the march" under the guise of restoring allegedly "historical justice".
    And what is there to talk about if you watch what films are being filmed at the official level. Recently I looked here "The Bloody Lady", about Saltychikha. A petty fool and a gas chamber that killed more than 100 people is represented there as a kind of victim of circumstances, unhappy love and persecution of the powerful. Fuck, don't get up.
    1. VLR
      0
      1 October 2019 11: 43
      Read the next article - there will be a small excursion into the "Golden Age" of Catherine: "open, easily verifiable data, all from official sources, no" conspiracy theories. "And decide whether I belittle Catherine's merits, or some other of these merits are exaggerating. don't jump to conclusions yet.
  12. 0
    1 October 2019 11: 17
    Quote: VlR
    I do not see any signs of degeneration

    Eyes popping out of their sockets, painful bags under the eyes, a disproportionately small chin. And all this at a young age.
    1. VLR
      -2
      1 October 2019 11: 39
      Look closely at people in the subway or somewhere else: 30 percent with such criteria in the "degenerates" write.
      1. -3
        1 October 2019 11: 52
        I now have work within walking distance, so I don’t use the metro, but even when I used people with a similar set of degenerative signs on my face I met very rarely.

        Yes: and how is the mental retardation of a particular Karl Peter Ulrich (noted by all foreign diplomats in official reports, who cannot be accused of political engagement) related to the IQ level of ordinary metro users - like "every cook should be able to steer the state"? laughing
        1. VLR
          -1
          1 October 2019 12: 00
          Still, it is better to judge the mental abilities of a working person not by bags under the eyes, but by his "performance". The activities of Peter III as Emperor of Russia will be discussed in the next article.
          1. -2
            1 October 2019 12: 07
            How would it have been known about the results of Karl Peter Ulrich as king and not previously? laughing
            1. VLR
              -1
              1 October 2019 12: 16
              Upon closer examination, it turns out that very many people do not know exactly, and what is known does not correspond to reality. The most striking example is the peace treaty with Prussia: whoever you ask, almost everyone will say that Peter III gave Prussia. Which is absolutely wrong. Below, just, a man writes about "a humiliating peace with Prussia." Some people know about the decree on "Liberty of the nobility." And what about the remaining 191 decrees?
              1. -2
                1 October 2019 12: 31
                And where does the peace treaty with Prussia - Catherine II was forced to conclude it on the fact of a crude throw by Peter III of Russia's allies in the Seven Years War (Austria-Hungary and France), when the Russian army suddenly not only sided with the former enemy, but also began to lead active fighting against former allies.

                It was necessary to smooth out such a feint with the ears of Karl Peter Ulrich for several years, for which it was necessary to conclude a peace treaty with Prussia following the results of the armistice and other failures in the foreign policy of the mentally retarded head of the Russian state.
                1. VLR
                  +1
                  1 October 2019 12: 33
                  Here, as they say, as required to prove. You also know nothing about peace treaties with Prussia concluded by Peter III and Catherine II. Read the following article.
      2. 0
        1 October 2019 21: 37
        Valery, about a thousand people go through the house every day (there were 730 people on Friday) and I have few with such signs. I specifically did not count, but probably% 10 maximum
    2. +1
      1 October 2019 19: 57
      Wiki:
      At the autopsy, which was carried out on the orders of Catherine, it was found that Peter III had severe heart dysfunction, intestinal inflammation and signs of apoplexy.
      A number of modern medical examinations based on preserved documents and evidence revealed that Peter III suffered from bipolar disorder with a mild depressive phase, suffered from hemorrhoids, and therefore could not sit in one place for a long time. Microcardia detected at autopsy usually involves a complex of congenital developmental disorders.

      bipolar disorder-manic-depressive psychosis, TIR; initially - circular psychosis) - an endogenous mental disorder, manifested in the form of affective states: manic (or hypomanic) and depressive (or subdepressive), and sometimes mixed states.
      In short, what the sovereign needs.
      1. VLR
        -2
        1 October 2019 20: 49
        Is it possible to believe the autopsy organized by the order of the murderer if the dissector does not see the strangulation groove on the neck of the murdered person at close range? Which, with the naked eye, is seen on the corpse by the Frenchman Rulier and the Dane Schumacher. Well, and the "examinations" based on the false words of the conspirators and murderers can only characterize the charlatans who undertook to carry them out.
        1. -1
          1 October 2019 22: 24
          I didn’t want to reproach you, I like your articles. Therefore, I wrote what was taken from Wiki, the same source, and wrote not to you, preferring not to read my comets.
  13. +6
    1 October 2019 11: 57
    Perhaps Pyotr Fedorovich, indeed, as a private person was not such a bad and vicious person as too biased sources describe him in truth, but if we turn to the facts, he was simply no statesman.
    So, fact 1. A sharp exit from the victorious Seven Years' War, the conclusion of a humiliating alliance with Prussia, where Russia was assigned not even a second, but a third role after Holstein, demonstratively causing the army and guards to switch to Prussian standards. Bottom line: the total discontent of the personnel of the armed forces.
    Fact 2. Again, a demonstrative public rejection of Orthodox Christianity as such with a statement and not only intentions to completely secularize not only the church-wide, but also the personal property of the clergy, which, of course, was perceived by the population as persecution of faith. Bottom line: for the first time the mood of the general public, in any case the capitals, was on the side of the conspirators. Prior to this, the general population did not care about guards pranks of the 18th century.
    Fact 3. Repeated dismissive remarks by the head of state in relation to the country as a matter of fact and its people.
    And this is not to mention to put it mildly, negligence as a politician whom Frederick himself warned about the danger of such actions ...
    The overall result: at first the man lost his crown, and then his life ... Does it then need to be discussed about the existence of a state mind in Pyotr Fedorovich?
    1. +2
      1 October 2019 18: 38
      I don’t see a relatively large mind, but it can’t be written down in stupid people. Rather, something in between
  14. +2
    1 October 2019 18: 34
    Interesting. I did not come across Lomonosov’s thoughts about reforming the Church.
    1. +1
      2 October 2019 11: 23
      It surprised me very much. In my opinion, Lomonosov couldn’t be bored even without the church refomirony
  15. 0
    1 October 2019 20: 21
    "The main advantage of this candidate was her artistry" well, let's put it not only that Elizabeth was guided by this motive. This has been done for a long time
  16. 0
    1 October 2019 21: 23
    Valery, Panin is almost right: "he hardly spoke Russian": then at the Court the foreign language was preferred. It is unlikely that the heir was eager to communicate with Panin and naturally he spoke more German
    1. VLR
      +1
      1 October 2019 21: 49
      No, the favorite and main language of Peter III was French. He corresponded exclusively in French. Frederick II, by the way, also loved French. But the German king considered rude and did not like, once said that he would rather release to the theater
      a horse scene than a German singer. But Peter spoke Russian well: in this article there is proof of this - Elizabeth’s discontent with the fact that the heir spends a lot of time with ordinary people from the servant — soldiers, rangers, lackeys, kitchen workers. He could communicate with them only in Russian.
  17. +1
    1 October 2019 21: 49
    Valery, I really like your story and look forward to continuing. On the whole, I can’t dispute and don’t want to, but in detail, based on logic and psychology, I will comment
  18. +3
    1 October 2019 23: 40
    The fact that Petra3 pretty much poured feces on his wife and her courtiers is beyond doubt. And the fact that he was not as he was painted was also understandable. He was quite intelligent and thought sensibly. And the habit of the German order against the background of motivation and the mess of Elizabeth was quite appropriate. But the fact remains. Catherine destroyed two centuries-old enemies of our state - the Crimean Khanate and the Commonwealth. She returned the Russian lands lost centuries before and eliminated the centuries-old threat of Tatar raids. This alone makes us forget how she ended up on the throne. request
  19. +1
    2 October 2019 09: 12
    To be honest, I still don't understand whether the author has a personal or "professional" dislike for Catherine the Great. To reshuffle the historical facts and subjective opinions of people of that era in the article is something! (The haberdasher and the cardinal are strength!) And in the end, reduce everything to one - Petya (if only they had given him - wow), and Katya - byaka, fu-fu-fu, the damned killer. The article belongs to the opinion section, because the historical facts cited by the author are already known. If I still read the first part, then I ran this one. Author, are you a historian or a politician?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"