Military Review

Russia plans to increase defense spending

62
The draft federal budget for the three-year period from 2020 to 2022 implies an increase in defense spending. If it is adopted, this will be the first increase in defense spending in Russia after a substantial reduction in the past few years.




So, it is assumed that the level of expenses in comparison with the 2019 year will be increased by approximately 6,6%. If you call the sum in absolute terms, then this is about 1,9 trillion rubles. Currently, the prescribed amount of defense spending is 1,776 trillion rubles.

The draft budget notes that more than half of the funds planned for the allocation should go to national defense. We are talking about the amount of 1,056 trillion rubles in the 2020 year. By 2022, this amount will reach almost 1,1 trillion rubles.

At the moment, the level of increase in spending on Russia's defense is higher than inflation. Recall that, according to the forecast of the Central Bank, inflation following the results of the 2019 of the year will be from 4,7 to 5,2%. Previously, the peak forecast was 5,5%. If the inflation threshold at the end of the year reaches the value of 5-5,2%, then increasing the level of defense spending in 6,6% will more likely mean that the government is trying to keep it at the existing level.

For comparison, US spending on the military industry in 2020 will amount to more than 750 billion dollars, which exceeds the defense spending of all countries of the world combined.
62 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 26 September 2019 06: 17
    +6
    If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...
    1. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 26 September 2019 06: 22
      0
      There is nothing to be done, the vast territory of Russia is pushing for this.
      1. Prisoner
        Prisoner 26 September 2019 07: 02
        0
        Not just the territory. "Partners" are also fussing a lot. Named to ghouls. hi
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather 26 September 2019 06: 23
      0
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...
      kudrina - prepare a separate VIP room ... it will definitely be a "kondrat" from such news ...
      1. Andrey Chistyakov
        Andrey Chistyakov 26 September 2019 06: 25
        0
        Quote: Dead Day
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...
        kudrina - prepare a separate VIP room ... it will definitely be a "kondrat" from such news ...

        Shoigu go and "blame" -Kudrin then ...
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 26 September 2019 06: 28
          -7
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          Quote: Dead Day
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...
          kudrina - prepare a separate VIP room ... it will definitely be a "kondrat" from such news ...

          Shoigu go and "blame" -Kudrin then ...

          certainly not "world imperialism". and Kozhugetich, cho, retire soon, he is generally not interested in curls.
          1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
            SERGEY SERGEEVICS 26 September 2019 06: 49
            +2
            and Kozhugetych, retiring soon,
            They have removed these restrictions.
            1. Grandfather
              Grandfather 26 September 2019 06: 57
              -2
              Quote: SERGEY SERGEEVICS
              and Kozhugetych, retiring soon,
              They have removed these restrictions.

              instincts then remained ...
        2. Chaldon48
          Chaldon48 26 September 2019 15: 23
          0
          If only everything went into business, lovers of stuffed feed for a state account should be sent for life.
    3. Pravodel
      Pravodel 26 September 2019 07: 35
      +1
      Not only Kudrina, but the whole liberal company that settled down to live comfortably in Russia ...
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 26 September 2019 07: 49
        +2
        They all have one thing no matter how much military spending grows, their wallets will not suffer from this. hi
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 26 September 2019 08: 48
      -1
      It is possible to increase defense spending, but there will be no pensioners in the country. And who needs them in liberal Russia? winked
      1. Roman070280
        Roman070280 26 September 2019 09: 50
        +1
        So protect it is not pensioners .. and not us with you ..
        There is a direct analogy .. when the United States will fight until the last Ukrainian ..
        And our government will protect us .. until the last Russian ..
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 43
        -4
        Your defense-related pensions are not connected at all.
    5. Civil
      Civil 26 September 2019 08: 50
      0
      For comparison, US spending on the military industry in 2020 will amount to more than 750 billion dollars, which exceeds the defense spending of all countries of the world combined.

      Still need to add on the costs of NATO and all sorts of Japan with Australia, in general there will be an astronomical figure.
      The entire budget of Russia is 1611 billion US dollars.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 45
        -2
        "The entire budget of Russia is 1611 billion US dollars" - Not the budget, but the annual GDP. The budget is 18 trillion rubles.
    6. kapitan92
      kapitan92 26 September 2019 11: 13
      +3
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...

      Russia plans to increase defense spending

      What a catchy article title! It should be mentioned that it does not increase, but compensates for the inflationary process.
      Dates 2020-2022gg. Now inflation is around 5%, so 6% will be from 2020, or even higher.
      This money will be "devoured" by an increase in salary. servicemen, and an increase in the price of equipment, so that in the "specific" expression the amount will not change.
      I'm not sure that Kudrin will be "upset"! Now, if you "hand" the saw "Friendship" to him, yes ...
    7. svp67
      svp67 26 September 2019 12: 29
      0
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      If only Kudrin "felt sorry" .. Again "upset" ...

      But he will have another reason to "be smart"
      So, it is assumed that the level of expenses in comparison with the 2019 year will be increased by approximately 6,6%. If you call the sum in absolute terms, then this is about 1,9 trillion rubles.
      Well, here it is "payment" for the termination of the INF Treaty
    8. cormorant
      cormorant 26 September 2019 13: 19
      0
      I will keep my fingers on the cross so that nothing interferes with these plans. good
  2. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
    SERGEY SERGEEVICS 26 September 2019 06: 25
    -3
    Russia plans to increase defense spending

    What the whales do, it will be the most correct decision. Yes, and the territory, with the water itself, wishes and demands it.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 26 September 2019 08: 53
      +2
      "Stripes" are doing the same thing after 1945, so what? And who among us has appointed himself the "people" on behalf of whom ... is that the question? winked
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
        SERGEY SERGEEVICS 26 September 2019 10: 33
        0
        "Stripes" are doing the same thing after 1945, so what?

        And to prevent this from happening, for this they increase defense spending. That would somehow happen and thereby save their country, as was done since the 1945 of the year.
        what?

        Then it follows from your logic that it is unnecessary to resist them, and it’s better to give this money back to them, since they have been doing it since 1945, I can tell you a little secret, we will increase military spending until we can stop this dirty trick.
        And who among us has appointed himself "the people"

        The people, as it always has been, speaks of one name about it.
        on whose behalf

        On behalf of the people.
  3. Astra wild
    Astra wild 26 September 2019 06: 40
    0
    If this happens, soon Kasyanov and Ksenia Sobchak and others will begin to flood with tears: common people. And abroad, everyone will be in touch: Russian
    1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
      SERGEY SERGEEVICS 26 September 2019 06: 47
      -4
      Kasyanov and Ksenia Sobchak and others will begin to burst into tears: common people

      It will be their personal problems, and not the common people. There will be many like them, who will shed their tears, just to prevent this. But defense spending needs to be increased, current is not too late yes hi .
    2. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 26 September 2019 07: 09
      0
      Quote: Astra wild
      If this happens, soon Kasyanov and Ksenia Sobchak and others will begin to flood with tears: common people. And abroad, everyone will be in touch: Russian

      don't get distracted from driving ... fraught.
  4. demo
    demo 26 September 2019 06: 56
    -1
    Honestly, the photo for the article was perplexing.
    "LIMIT 3" - is it a cause or effect of increased costs?
    Okay. Joke.
    It would be necessary for the authors or proofreaders to select the appropriate photo.
    Fortunately, the choice is huge.
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 26 September 2019 07: 32
    +2
    I hope they will send enough funds for SCIENTIFIC research and development !!! because otherwise, "effective managers" from saving \ ki will leave our army without advanced weapons!
    And finally, I don’t understand how the "mines of economic development" can be combined into one whole ??? If they SAVE, then what kind of development can there be ??? Especially with us, especially now, when they, in addition to saving, optimization, reduction ... in short, finish off what else works!
    Br -r - some sort.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 26 September 2019 09: 32
      +3
      But I don’t understand something else — there is no economic development, but is there a ministry? And the staff. And what about labor productivity? Should there be any criteria?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 September 2019 10: 10
        0
        Common sense should be clear goals .... in short, the program \ development plan.
        Hi Dmitry soldier
        In general, all the bodies that advocate for savings, optimization, and so on .... the most dangerous structures in the state system! their goals / objectives, this stomp on the spot, the ultimate dream, will not be rolled back in development !!! We have everything that tip-top, everything is developed by the most I can not ???
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 26 September 2019 11: 01
          +2
          hi Hello, Victor! fellow saving and optimization on the most important state and national needs is disgusting to me. Those who call for one could set an example of personal savings? No way! You write---- dreams --- do not roll back ?? here, I don’t agree, because everything has been declining gradually, which year am if there was a goal --- do not roll back, but it does not exist at all.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 September 2019 11: 10
            +1
            Quote: Reptiloid
            dreams --- do not roll back ??

            The ultimate dream ... and not the fact that they can achieve it! Stomping on the spot, this is in the end a rollback, it always turns out that way.
            By the way, yes, save on anyone, just not loved by yourself!
            Well I say dangerous, in our case worse than the obvious enemy!
        2. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 26 September 2019 11: 06
          +2
          Such a topic is interesting --- states, after the destruction of the USSR, what --- began to save on arms? No way! True, there were unsuccessful projects, but the lack of confrontation and the socialist camp did not lead to thoughts about saving, but rather
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 September 2019 11: 12
            +1
            Quote: Reptiloid
            states, after the destruction of the USSR, what --- began to save on arms?

            They didn’t save, but the cost structure changed ... it affected the quality of preparation of everything and everything!
            More expensive does not mean better.
            1. Reptiloid
              Reptiloid 26 September 2019 12: 42
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              .... They didn’t save, but the cost structure changed ... it affected ....

              The options can be different, including from the joy that they destroyed the USSR ---- it hit the head, or they began to saw more and the possibilities to create this
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 48
        +2
        If there is two percent annual growth, then there is development. All the same, 2,5 trillion rubles are not small money.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 26 September 2019 11: 16
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          If there is two percent annual growth, then there is development. All the same, 2,5 trillion rubles are not small money.

          It all depends on the structure of development !!! Where and in what kind of way the climb goes, where not ah, where is the complete seam.
          If you interview all the MANUFACTURERS that are present here on the site, you can get some approximate picture !!! Everything is simple, everything is complicated.
          1. Reptiloid
            Reptiloid 26 September 2019 13: 29
            +2
            Surprisingly, Victor ---- you turned out to rhyme. lol
            Where? And in what?
            It seems like a climb?
            Where ---- not ah!
            Where ----- full seams!
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 26 September 2019 13: 56
              +1
              He was not, not noticed ... in romantic inclinations. It happened.
  6. wt100
    wt100 26 September 2019 07: 40
    -1
    We don’t forget about Yevkurov, we somehow zealously put him back into operation, isn’t Shoygu to be replaced? Suddenly Kuzhigetych on a demobilization, oh, wanted to retire. feel
  7. midshipman
    midshipman 26 September 2019 07: 49
    +1
    Common sense won, and the situation in the world requires this. This is a good answer with all sorts of curls.
  8. Ros 56
    Ros 56 26 September 2019 08: 02
    -3
    Here they are, then we will reduce, then we will add. What kind of confusion and stagger? The costs should be sufficient to show everyone who is against us where the crayfish hibernate. Usually, after a hundred years, everyone does not want to look askance in our direction. This time it is necessary to increase the term five times. fellow good negative soldier
  9. Sergei 23
    Sergei 23 26 September 2019 09: 01
    -1
    For comparison, US spending on the military industry in 2020 will amount to more than 750 billion dollars, which exceeds the defense spending of all countries of the world combined. Yes, just their printed products are in great demand all over the world.
  10. Antidote
    Antidote 26 September 2019 09: 06
    0
    Guns instead of oil. Mmmm, a blooper. Some in the race with soybeans tore their stomach, now try #2.

    Meanwhile
    The government wants to once again increase the tax burden on the population and private business (VAT, excise taxes and duties). This is done in order to reduce the tax burden for oil and gas companies that have agreed on large-scale benefits.

    So tighten the belts, cheers.
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 26 September 2019 09: 55
      0
      in order to reduce the tax burden for oil and gas companies

      So gasoline will rise in price too ..
      But, as Putin said, we cannot offend our oil and gas sector ..
      1. AU Ivanov.
        AU Ivanov. 26 September 2019 10: 34
        -1
        Quite the opposite. Our oil industry is crushed by taxes, duties and excise taxes. Hence the rising gasoline: no one will work at a loss. The price of gas is rising due to the greed of the state, but not of the oil industry.
        1. Roman070280
          Roman070280 26 September 2019 10: 54
          +1
          On the contrary, what ??)
          as Putin said-we can’t offend our oil and gas sector ..

          Well, try this phrase "on the contrary" ..

          Gas price rises due to state greed

          What a horror .. And who is the state, let me ask ??

          Here I see only two options .. or is it the people themselves (as a representative of the state) greedy .. and forcing the oil workers to work at a loss (although the definition of "poor oil workers" in itself only leads to a stupor)
          Or Putin should be read as "we cannot offend our oil and gas sector, they are already crushed by taxes, duties and excise taxes because of my greed."

          PS .. I’m silent about the fact that you can offend ordinary hard workers and pensioners a priori ..
          because I have never heard of them "it is assumed that the level of expenses in comparison with 2019 will be increased by about 6,6%."
          1. AU Ivanov.
            AU Ivanov. 26 September 2019 12: 07
            -1
            The tax burden can also drive miners into minus, not only oilmen.
            1. Roman070280
              Roman070280 26 September 2019 15: 07
              0
              If the tax burden on mining is so high .. probably the state (represented by the people) should be fine .. But something I personally don’t notice this money .. neither from state employees, nor from pensioners ..
              Gasoline is rising in price, taxes are rising .. and is this all flowing to where ?? The question is rhetorical ..

              PS .. similarly, you can say about cigarettes, which have already passed for a hundred, and about a bunch of everything else ..
              They tear on all fronts .. but in return for some reason only a shish with oil ..
              1. AU Ivanov.
                AU Ivanov. 26 September 2019 15: 14
                0
                And you will divide all the fees from the hydrocarbon trade by the number of citizens. There will not be so much for everyone, after the allocation of funds for defense and other expenses. Everyone shouts about the example of Norway, they just forget that the Norgs produce oil and gas exactly 6 times more per capita.
                1. Roman070280
                  Roman070280 27 September 2019 09: 29
                  0
                  Everyone shouts that the Norgs produce oil and gas 6 times more per capita, they just forget that in our country there is not only oil and gas ..
                  Unlike Norway, we have everything ... from the word at all .. Starting from wood, coal (yes, some even have to buy it), water, gold, diamonds, iron, nickel, and ending with the sale of weapons, Rosatom, etc. .p .. It’s easier to find what we don’t have ..

                  Well, after that you can still compare yourself not with Norway, but with the same Ukraine, where:
                  1 - almost none of this is for export
                  2 - much still has to be bought even for yourself, importing (this already doubles the cost, in comparison with the exporting country)
                  3,4,5-10 - do not work, jump, jump, burn, blow up, fight, rally ..

                  Summarize, multiply .. and by the end they live only a couple of times worse than us ..
                  Here she is .. entertaining mathematics ..
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 52
      +1
      "This is done in order to reduce the tax burden for oil and gas companies, which have agreed on large-scale benefits." For oil and gas companies, all taxes have gone up as well as for everyone, their cost of raw materials is growing, there is no point in making concessions.
  11. EvilLion
    EvilLion 26 September 2019 09: 33
    0
    What nonsense, what are the reductions in the last few years? The military budget grew all 2000 17 years in a row, some of the cuts were EMNIP on 2019.
  12. Lexus
    Lexus 26 September 2019 09: 40
    +1
    If you call the sum in absolute terms, then this is about 1,9 trillion rubles

    $ 30 billion. It seemed to me alone that Michelson's "budget" is larger?
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 26 September 2019 10: 00
      +3
      You don’t understand anything .. Someone’s soup is thin, and some’s pearls are small ..
      The tsar looks at Michelson's "budget", and rightly believes that if 30 billion. spread over 150 million people ... then every michelson will not suffer so much ..
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 55
        0
        From the beginning, you sell all his property movable and not movable - and then you will receive 30 billions, already in money, and not the estimated value of all that he has.
        1. Roman070280
          Roman070280 26 September 2019 11: 34
          -1
          Why do I need this ?? Or do you really expect him to have to sell his property ??)
  13. Tavrik
    Tavrik 26 September 2019 09: 47
    +1
    The defense industry begins to joyfully rub his sweaty palms in anticipation of buns and gingerbread ... wink
    Do not throw minuses - I’m sitting here, rubbing myself ...
  14. Potato
    Potato 26 September 2019 10: 37
    +1
    This means that there will be less on education and medicine. Well, great, what ...

    Infrastructure would be developed. They made the economy more efficient. Why is inflation so wild? And the refinancing rate from the Central Bank? It’s necessary to treat the economy and not to rivet the guns
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 September 2019 10: 59
      0
      Budget items go separately from each other, medicine and education, including how much is planned for the next year’s budget and will be spent. The question is how effectively each of the 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation uses this money.
    2. Roman070280
      Roman070280 26 September 2019 11: 43
      +1
      Look how arrogant you are ... he doesn’t like inflation ..))
      And some yesterday said the opposite:
      President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with members of the government noted that one reason for lower inflation in Russia - the twist that the Central Bank (CB) made in anticipation of the arrival of 700 billion rubles in the economy. But this money is delayed due to insufficient work on national projects, the president said.


      So, we usually refer to the current state of inflation as "decreased."
      But when the "twist" is still unscrewed .. let's go dive ..))


      PS .. As they say, the main thing is not the form, but the content (s)
      1. Potato
        Potato 26 September 2019 15: 08
        0
        And why does this not surprise anyone? Why is inflation high, purchasing power and the ruble falling all the time?
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 September 2019 21: 06
        0
        And you know inflation in Russia does not affect the price increase anymore - speculators influence all prices.