NATO responded to Putin’s missile offer

49
The North Atlantic Alliance has received an offer from Russian President Vladimir Putin to introduce a moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles instead of the INF Treaty, but will not accept it because they do not trust Russia. This was reported by NATO representative Oana Lungescu.

NATO responded to Putin’s missile offer




Lungescu said that NATO has received an offer from the Russian authorities, but they do not trust such an offer. According to her, this initiative ignores reality on the ground, since Russia has already deployed SSC-8 missiles (9M729 Novator missiles according to NATO classification) that are prohibited by the treaty on its territory.

Until Russia destroys the SSC-8 system, this deployment moratorium is not a real proposal. We again call on Russia to act as a responsible international entity

she said, adding that the alliance with its allies conducted its own evaluation of the SSC-8 missile and came to the conclusion that the missile violates the agreement on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles.

At the same time, Lungescu said that NATO will not “respond in a mirror” to Moscow’s actions and deploy its own missiles, including in an arms race. According to her, the alliance will respond in other ways.

We will not mirror what Russia is doing. We do not want a new arms race and do not intend to deploy a new nuclear force in Europe weapon ground based. (...) firmly committed to maintaining effective arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation

- she said.

Previously reported. that Russian President Vladimir Putin sent to NATO countries, as well as other non-member states, a proposal to introduce a moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles instead of the INF Treaty, which has expired.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    25 September 2019 19: 38
    Well, did someone doubt it? request
    They do not need binding (to execute) Contracts. Their main idea is that America rules the World.
    Well, why do we need it? Let the Geyropeytsy Soar ... they are in Nate!
    And We are in Mashi, Nastya, Kristina, Marina .... You can’t write so many names laughing
    1. +17
      25 September 2019 19: 42
      We do not want a new arms race and do not intend to deploy new land-based nuclear weapons in Europe.

      I do not believe! (c) Stanislavsky
      So Putin, perhaps, also does not believe NATO, and as far as he does not believe Shoigu, only Shoigu himself knows laughing
      1. -14
        25 September 2019 20: 47
        Quote: Honest Citizen
        We do not want a new arms race and do not intend to deploy new land-based nuclear weapons in Europe.

        I do not believe! (c) Stanislavsky
        So Putin, perhaps, also does not believe NATO, and as far as he does not believe Shoigu, only Shoigu himself knows laughing

        It’s not that NATO does not trust Putin; NATO is simply not afraid of it! The offshore aristocracy of Russia will NEVER shoot at their palaces and children in the West ...
        1. -3
          26 September 2019 07: 37
          I totally agree.
          1. +2
            26 September 2019 12: 55
            I totally disagree.
            The aristocracy is not an army ... it does not know how to shoot ... but a soldier or officer whose family will be aggressed by NATO and the United States does not hesitate to press the Kalash trigger or the rocket launcher button.
        2. +7
          26 September 2019 07: 48
          . It’s not that NATO does not trust Putin; NATO is simply not afraid of it!
          The offshore aristocracy of Russia will NEVER shoot at their palaces and children in the West ...

          Well yes. Right. Therefore, missiles and missiles are deployed along our borders. Just in case, probably. Or they are going to defend themselves from Iran. Or from igil. They are so aggressive. wassat
          1. -3
            26 September 2019 09: 12
            To produce and place is one thing, to decide on an application is another. Production is money; placement is a warning not to touch property abroad. And you can apply for your property only in one case. When they take him away. But here relatives remain hostage.
            1. 0
              27 September 2019 13: 34
              Quote: Souchastnik
              To produce and place is one thing, to decide on an application is another. Production is money; placement is a warning not to touch property abroad. And you can apply for your property only in one case. When they take him away. But here relatives remain hostage.

              So why don't they "defend" from Spain or Brazil or Germany?
              Well, we put Brazil and do not take into account wassat
      2. +6
        26 September 2019 00: 37
        But now Putin’s hands are untied. INF may be placed at your discretion.
    2. -6
      25 September 2019 20: 02
      Well, someone Doubted? [
      WILL Aleksey AleksandrovichI doubt it. It's all farce. And imitation. In short, super-duper operation "trumpnash" bully laughing good
      1. +10
        25 September 2019 20: 22
        Quote: Observer2014
        Well, someone Doubted? [
        WILL Aleksey AleksandrovichI doubt it. It's all farce. And imitation. In short, super-duper operation "trumpnash" bully laughing good

        I doubt it.
        Well, in vain! Stripes are very tricky, they do everything to fool people like you hiand then try to impose their conditions laughing
        1. -16
          25 September 2019 20: 27
          Stripes are very tricky, they do everything to fool people like you
          Yes Yeah. You tell my grandfathers. My grandfathers said that we would live under communism. Fathers that socialism is the door to a brighter future. I scratch like that. Your tongues are burning laughing My children do not comb your bullshit, you are liars ..... Yes
          1. +9
            25 September 2019 20: 40
            .You tell this to my grandfathers.

            You believe them, then the cards are in your hands.
            Our grandfathers said that we will live under communism. To the fathers, that socialism is the door to a bright future

            So it was necessary to preserve it, many of which took the oath to their country where it was said ** to preserve and protect their country. **
            Scratch me like this. That your tongues are burning laughing. My children don’t comb your bullshit, you are liars.
            Something you have already gone wrong.
            1. -15
              25 September 2019 20: 49
              Who is here about the oath rustled? On the site IN! And the oath of the USSR is not compatible with nicknames! laughing Yes good
              Something you have already gone wrong.
              This is where not: there feel ?
    3. -1
      25 September 2019 21: 39
      Yes, and there is no faith for you - NATO scoundrels! am soldier It’s time to water you, and in the toilet too !!! am wassat
  2. +4
    25 September 2019 19: 42
    NATO responded to Putin’s missile offer
    What could the messages intended for slaughter answer? On the other hand, what are we from them, hurray, Yankees out? feel water drop by drop ..... A sledgehammer is needed here.
  3. +33
    25 September 2019 19: 42
    YOU, the wretched Europeans and the USSR did not trust, but he took you and unified Germany and reunited unilaterally and withdrew the troops and the Warsaw Pact dismissed, only zero sense, the result - NATO F-16s in half an hour from Moscow, do not do good and you won’t evil ...
    1. +6
      25 September 2019 19: 56
      Why did you stop, go on with the list - you yourself have fallen into fifteen states, your army has also collapsed your economy so as not to scare your neighbors. Only all this was done not by the USSR, but by Judas
      Gorbachev
      1. +6
        25 September 2019 20: 37
        Judas the Spotted would not have had such brains, and everything turned out just so that the Liberdy blank, trained briefly for six months or a year in the West, took our whole pantheon so tightly that the elders had no choice but to agree .. .
      2. +3
        26 September 2019 05: 23
        The "domino principle" worked, but the idea of ​​general disarmament is not there, why did the NATO jackals consider virtue as weakness ???
      3. +2
        26 September 2019 09: 21
        In the USSR, there was a collegial government body. It is convenient to blame Gorbachev, especially since there is a reason. But they destroyed the Union with the connivance of the rest of the "comrades". Material benefits have been nurtured, but there is no opportunity to use it. What a first secretary would look like on his yacht in the ocean, or in a three-story villa on the Adriatic Sea. A maserati buy a complete ATAS. OBKhSS will be interested. So they went to capitalism to realize what they deserved. All the rich in the 90s are mostly party and Komsomol functionaries.
    2. +4
      25 September 2019 20: 24
      Quote: anjey
      YOU, the wretched Europeans and the USSR did not trust, but he took you and unified Germany and reunited unilaterally and withdrew the troops and the Warsaw Pact dismissed, only zero sense, the result - NATO F-16s in half an hour from Moscow, do not do good and you won’t evil ...

      Your-our feelings are clear. They did not trust, we opened, they got everything. So they and well done, got a good sense. (On a choice of 1. The VD was lowered, so it wouldn’t seem like a great deal, it was necessary to bash on the bash, but it’s impossible.
      2. "You don't need a knife on ....., you will lie to him in three boxes and do whatever you want with him. What a blue sky.")
      Here they are not supporters of robbery, they are robbers. And we are "guys, let's live together" It's high time for the tinsel. What are the pseudo-human laws. Here is Kosovo, here is Crimea, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, LDNR, if necessary (it can do it ourselves if they want)
  4. 0
    25 September 2019 19: 50
    Why are these letters ... and to whom ..., we show our weakness. It would be better to reveal a little secret to the "partners". If they twitch, then what and where, and most importantly, how much, according to average estimates, will burn in 1 MRNU. And let them maneuver ... more ... But apparently the GDP is better known ..
    1. +13
      25 September 2019 20: 15
      Quote: megadeth
      Why do these letters ... and to whom ... show our weakness. ..

      No, it's just "tossing the ball" to their side, putting them in a very awkward position. Look, we made them a concrete proposal to improve security in Europe, and they only managed to say "we don't trust Russia ..", like some first-graders. Well, if they don't trust, then let them not be offended ...
    2. +5
      25 September 2019 21: 19
      Quote: megadeth
      apparently GDP is more visible.

      However, the position is binding. Yes And yes, thus, by "attack on the forehead," the entire Western camarilla was brought to frankness, when half-hearted formulations (excuses) are no longer rolling, and you only need to answer in the key "yes-no." Which is what we had the opportunity to observe. And they said no. Well, their choice is their crap. Yes
  5. -2
    25 September 2019 19: 51
    Why was it so humiliating? It is already clear that the collective West needs a new vag. We will be appointed to them even against our will.
    1. 0
      25 September 2019 20: 44
      This is not humiliation, it was possible to get used to such mosquito injections for a long time, and most importantly, not to justify oneself, but with a call to accept such HOW would be weighty, but really empty, empty talk.
      And do not humble ourselves in excuses, but laugh at stupidity and weakness, poking at the stupid face of NAT, ineptitude, lack of assemble and indecision.
    2. AML
      +10
      25 September 2019 21: 05
      And why suddenly humble yourself? NATO is not the whole world and not even half. This is a promise to adequate countries that it is possible to agree with Russia, and the USA and the EC are simply irresponsible. I even wang that the UN will repeat the fate of the League of Nations.
  6. 0
    25 September 2019 19: 52
    It would be proposed and this is a fact, but there as they want. Now everyone can see who for what. They handed a straw, they do not want a poplar log.
  7. 0
    25 September 2019 19: 52
    I would just send NATO a message "do not forget what happened in Saudi Arabia, and more often look at the sky ..." let them puzzle over what we are talking about ... recourse
  8. +3
    25 September 2019 20: 14
    NATO responded to Putin’s missile offer

    This was to be expected from them, they are unreliable people, once again they have confirmed this.
    Lungescu said that NATO has received an offer from the Russian authorities, but they do not trust such an offer.
    From their own experience they say that they’re used to fooling and deceiving everyone and begin to equal others in their own right Yes
    1. 0
      25 September 2019 21: 11
      Hmm. Gone are the days when it was customary to take gentlemen's word. So lied there that now it’s normal.
  9. +4
    25 September 2019 20: 24
    Russia brazenly pushed its borders to NATO bases.
    Clinical liars about trust? Missile defense systems cannot shoot Tomahawks in the least bit. For a couple of weeks, we developed, produced and tested ground launchers and everyone was impressed and believed.
    However, it is not necessary to turn to NATO, but directly to future potential victims.
  10. +5
    25 September 2019 20: 35
    According to her, the alliance will respond in other ways.

    Who would doubt that!? winked We, even here, at VO, already feel these "State Department methods" in some of the more frequent comments Yes
  11. +2
    25 September 2019 20: 58
    Well, well, who will believe you, Ms. Lunescu? After all, NATO is the United States, and not some Europeans-archers. Your vileness in our relations will probably not be assured of your honesty. Bastards do not believe
  12. -2
    25 September 2019 21: 12
    Kindergarten.
  13. +3
    25 September 2019 21: 36
    Well, that is the choice of the West. I think that no one on our side expected anything else. But the formal side was observed, the West confirmed that it was he who was interested in the situation of destabilization. as they say, we did everything we could. Now do not be offended. The next negotiations will be on different conditions.
  14. 0
    25 September 2019 21: 39
    Anecdote from the Pacifist: After the campaign of 1812, Lieutenant Rzhevsky entered Paris as part of the tsarist army. During the general idle revelry, I decided to play with the local aristocrats in "Point". Sat down, play. And from time to time the situation is repeated when one of the players says "I have a point" - and everyone folds their cards at once. Rzhevsky in bewilderment asks: "Gentlemen, excuse me. Why does no one ask to show cards when one of the players says I have a" point "?" Rzhevsky, with barely concealed disdain, answer: "Lieutenant ... gentlemen are gathering here ... the gentleman's word is law ... if a gentleman said, then it is so ... your suspicion is insulting ..." POPPERLO ...
  15. +5
    25 September 2019 21: 54
    But do not believe or disbelieve, you just need to know that in the event of a US and NATO attack on Russia, the answer will be one: a nuclear strike on the attacking side, NATO forces in Europe and command and control structures in the USA. Wherever these points are located, in the Nevada desert or in densely populated cities. Only in this way can the Third World War be prevented so that people who are furious at the end do not speak there.
  16. +1
    25 September 2019 21: 59
    Well shit-eaters, you had a chance to save your worthless skins ...
  17. +2
    25 September 2019 22: 04
    It is better to negotiate with NATO from a position of strength. To say that yes, we have these missiles .... they are aimed at the following objects. In case of their application, incl. , as a preventive disarming strike, in such and such a time so many facilities and populations of NATO countries will be destroyed. And when they start to be afraid ... then we need to start negotiations.
  18. +2
    25 September 2019 23: 05
    Maybe there was a calculation ... Especially, taking into account the fact that in the first place the violin is played by the line, and the whole nature will say what will be ordered ...
  19. 0
    25 September 2019 23: 26
    We will not mirror what Russia is doing. We do not want a new arms race and do not intend to deploy new land-based nuclear weapons in Europe. (...) firmly committed to maintaining effective arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation

    Does anyone here somewhere see the TRUTH ????? belay
    I personally do not! laughing A typical Western lie ... Russia is the only one to blame. That simply is ...
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. +2
    26 September 2019 01: 42
    because they do not trust Russia. This was reported by NATO representative Oana Lungescu

    Whose cow would bellow, if only the Romanian was silent. Should 24 Aegis Ashore launchers, suitable for launching cruise missiles, inspire Russia's confidence?
  22. 0
    26 September 2019 03: 04
    Shaw NATATO then without a hitch)))
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    26 September 2019 07: 03
    I don’t understand something, but who needs this more? Everything is fine with our air defense, at least half of the gifts will be intercepted, but what will they intercept? laughing In a thousand years, Russian-Chinese archaeologists will be grateful for the strong glassy layer, thanks to which it was possible to preserve European culture so well. laughing
  25. +1
    26 September 2019 12: 32
    An obviously peace-loving offer was rejected. Now let them blame themselves. In vain they are so careless about their fate.
  26. -1
    26 September 2019 15: 40
    NATO spokesman Oana Lungescu

    Old pepper shaker BBC Schnitz.
  27. -1
    26 September 2019 21: 31
    Nui to him is Volodya Lyapnul