At the Khmeimim airbase, protective hangars for the Su-34 and Su-35 were commissioned

67
The Russian Khmeimim air base is improving its infrastructure. One of the directions is the creation of protective structures for facilities aviation Russian Aerospace Forces. So, it is reported about the commissioning of protective systems for fighter-bombers Su-34 and Su-35 fighters, which are on alert in the Syrian province of Latakia.

At the Khmeimim airbase, protective hangars for the Su-34 and Su-35 were commissioned




Earlier, Russian aircraft were at the Khmeimim airbase in the open. At the same time, the location of Russian aviation was constantly shown in the pictures taken by foreign spy satellites. Sandstorms, air with a high salt vapor content due to proximity to the Mediterranean Sea, direct solar radiation did their job, causing damage to aircraft.

In the report of TC Zvezda, the deputy commander of the aviation regiment at Khmeimim, Lt. Col. Konstantin Dolgov talks about the created complexes for protecting aircraft.

The officer noted an important detail: the fuel supply to the aircraft is carried out in a centralized version, which significantly reduces the time for preparing fighters for combat missions.

Konstantin Dolgov about the shadow of the shelters:

A shadow affects the preservation of the technology itself: it does not fade. The climate here is quite hot, precipitation, all this affects the life of the equipment, including maintenance equipment. Well, the staff, of course, is easier to work with.

It should be noted that earlier, among experts, not everyone supported the need for the construction of protective hangars. However, as this plot shows, the Ministry of Defense made important conclusions for itself, taking into account the experience of operating equipment in Syrian conditions, and nevertheless came to an unambiguous conclusion: protective hangars are needed.

In total, at the moment there are 18 of these shelters for aircraft. The upper parts of the structure are reinforced with additional metal elements, which can protect, for example, from a falling drone- "kamikaze", if such a one suddenly "leaks" through the multi-stage system Defense air bases.



Separate issues from the point of view of security may remain, for example, to the integration of hangars in fact under a single roof.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    24 September 2019 17: 05
    Everything is fine, but to disperse it, it seems to me like that, maybe I'm mistaken.
    1. +4
      24 September 2019 18: 14
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Everything is fine, but to disperse it, it seems to me like that, maybe I'm mistaken.

      You are not mistaken.

    2. +1
      26 September 2019 14: 59
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      A shadow affects the preservation of the technology itself: it does not fade. The climate here is quite hot, precipitation, all this affects the life of the equipment, including maintenance equipment. Well, the staff, of course, is easier to work with.

      Here is an understanding of this, it seems, but it took years.. Now the question is, are similar structures not needed in our climate? How do our temperature differences affect equipment costing tens of millions of dollars, and how do the service personnel with their tools tolerate it, managing to service such complex and expensive equipment.. Isn't it time to build the required number of hangars for each unit in service, let's say a hangar of 1-2 million square meters per day for an aircraft costing 50 million square meters per day, and you'll see the service life will increase and combat readiness will increase, and equipment will run away less.. Saving on infrastructure (both for people and equipment, au "Ural" and submarine "Lira") is an old bad habit from the times of the USSR, it's time to tie it up.
  2. +10
    24 September 2019 17: 10
    To intercept 27 rockets fired at Khmeimim, 31 Shell rockets were used up.
    And how does the Israeli Dome hit rockets?
    1. +1
      24 September 2019 18: 35
      Also rockets. But they are with the STS.
      More expensive.
      We often attach a video to the interceptions of the Iron Dome.
      Were videos of the interception of missiles shells?
      1. -7
        24 September 2019 18: 50
        Along the way, I feel like a massive attack is planned on our base ..
        For the Saudis need to avenge the Russian VKS hehe heh
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Were videos of the interception of missiles shells?

        After all, so I understand you Alex?

        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Everything is fine, but to disperse it, it seems to me like that, maybe I'm mistaken.

        No, you sense the political situation correctly.. The Russian Aerospace Forces in the Middle East are already withdrawing some of their "comrades". We don't let them pirate in the skies of the Middle East.. That's how things are for the S-300 crews.
        1. 0
          24 September 2019 20: 27
          I have a video of some kind of missile system working on my phone. Rumor has it that this is the Shell in Hmeimim. I want to put the video here, but I can’t add, MP4 is not supported. If interested, please advise how to put it here
          1. -3
            24 September 2019 21: 38
            https://youtu.be/8JeDP7ObbFg

            Found a video on YouTube
            1. +1
              24 September 2019 22: 09
              Beautifully worked good
              1. -3
                24 September 2019 22: 59
                So is it an armor or not?) Did he seem to miss the rockets?)
            2. +9
              24 September 2019 23: 20
              Actually, this is a video from a computer game Arma-3. And the stelage is conducted from the Vulcan-phalanges))))
              1. +1
                24 September 2019 23: 40
                In bl, but I kept wondering what was the catch of this video, which was not published anywhere
                1. 0
                  25 September 2019 17: 02
                  Quote: jakson
                  In bl, but I kept wondering what was the catch of this video, which was not published anywhere

                  Do not worry, Eugene, it happens .. I caught myself several times on fakes. The main thing is that you are in the subject hi
            3. +2
              25 September 2019 02: 59
              Quote: jakson
              https://youtu.be/8JeDP7ObbFg

              my god, are you serious? can't tell the game from the real battle of the "shell"? graphics, and quite primitive ... wassat
      2. +3
        24 September 2019 18: 53
        I have not seen such videos.
        However, there is no doubt about this possibility.
        At one time, the Carapace had problems with the destruction of drones by artillery fire, then it was decided.
        Syria cured many technical failures.
        And about the video.
        If this happened over Russia, there would be a lot of video.
        Even the Chelyabinsk meteorite from all angles along the entire route was photographed.
        Glory to God does not fly over us.
        Therefore, it does not fly, because they destroy evil spirits at a distance.
        1. +3
          24 September 2019 18: 59
          I just heard that during the shelling of Khmeimim with rockets there were constant shortages. Therefore, it is difficult to judge what the Carapace intercepted, and what simply fell without reaching.
          So I asked ...
          1. 0
            24 September 2019 19: 24
            I have no reason not to believe the MO report.
            According to 27 rockets, 31 missiles were launched for destruction.
            Perhaps more shells were fired.
            It is quite reasonable that for shells that did not reach a certain distance to positions, missiles to kill do not start.
            It seems to me that any air defense system should work this way, otherwise there will not be enough missiles.
          2. +2
            24 September 2019 20: 32
            voyaka uh (Alexey)
            How well you heard and accidentally asked ...
    2. 0
      24 September 2019 19: 22
      [quote = Livonetc] And how does the Israeli Dome hit missiles?
      Rocket "Tamir"
      The length of the rocket is 3 m, diameter is 160 mm, weight is 90 kg.
      Guidance system - active radar. The missile hits the target by commands received from the radar, which is located on the rocket itself.
      There is very little information.
      It writes about potential plans to increase the range to 250 km
      1. -2
        24 September 2019 22: 10
        The press usually indicates the range of intercepted missiles.
        For the "Iron Dome" (up to 70 km, mines and rockets are meant)
        I doubt that the Tamir itself will fly more than 20-30 km.
        1. -1
          24 September 2019 22: 42
          Quote: lexus
          I doubt that the Tamir itself will fly more than 20-30 km.

          And what are your doubts based on?
          If you want to put MINUS, then I accept them because they do not affect the state of affairs.
          And Tamir does not know about it.
          1. +1
            24 September 2019 23: 05
            Close Wikipedia and look at serious specialized sites.
            Anti-missile - SAMIR "Tamir" determines the short range of the complex "Iron Dome" 17-18 km, the length of the rocket is only 3 m, weight 90 kg and warhead - 11 kg.

            And add MINUS as something without my help.
            1. 0
              25 September 2019 06: 39
              Quote: lexus
              Anti-missile - SAMIR "Tamir" determines the short range of the complex "Iron Dome" 17-18 km, the length of the rocket is only 3 m, weight 90 kg and warhead - 11 kg.

              Your information is somewhat outdated and there is a mistake that the media is reprinting.
              "Anti-missile - SAM" Tamir "determines the short range of the complex" Iron Dome "17-18 km, the length of the missile is only 3 m, weight is 90 kg and warhead - 11 kg."
              https://army-news.ru/2014/12/zheleznyj-kupol-caxala-preimushhestva-i-nedostatki/
              There are more reliable sources:
              "Iron Dome's Tamir missile knocks down incoming threats launched from ranges of 4-70 km"
              https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/irondome

              "Short-range defense of occupied areas, lowest tier of Israeli layered missile defense; Tamir interceptor missile: 4-70 km range"
              https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/missile-defense-systems-2/allied-air-and-missile-defense-systems/allied-intercept-systems-coming-soon/iron-dome-israel/
  3. 0
    24 September 2019 17: 12
    The technician’s radio in his hand on 0: 30 - Baofeng UV-5R, on aliexpress a little more expensive than 1 thousand rubles. And according to reviews, they work noticeably better than what is available in the parts of our alleged production.
    1. +1
      25 September 2019 02: 24
      Do they probably have closed frequencies? Or are Barmaley missiles aimed at them?
      1. 0
        25 September 2019 10: 08
        there are no "closed" frequencies there, this is an ordinary analog radio VHF and UHF bands, but the Barmaleev rockets are not guided at them either, it is much easier and more reliable to direct missiles in other ways
        but I still hope that on these walkie-talkies they don’t say anything secret and useful to barmaley
        they buy them themselves, for their hard-earned money, because they work better and cost a penny - it’s not a pity to smash, lose
        and sometimes, by the way, they use trophy ones, there is a completely different technique, more expensive by 1-2 orders of magnitude
    2. +1
      25 September 2019 09: 14
      Quote: _Ugene_
      The technician’s radio in his hand on 0: 30 - Baofeng UV-5R, on aliexpress a little more expensive than 1 thousand rubles. And according to reviews, they work noticeably better than what is available in the parts of our alleged production.

      Import substitution.
  4. 0
    24 September 2019 17: 16
    And now you can quietly and inconspicuously strengthen the hangars from the inside.
    It will be a surprise if a drone hits it, but nothing will happen to the planes.
    1. -1
      24 September 2019 17: 29
      Quote: bk316
      if the drone gets into it and there will be nothing to the aircraft.

      It's better to do without the "if"
      1. +5
        24 September 2019 18: 41
        It's better to do without the "if"

        Better is better. Only when, back in the USSR, I was calculating the algorithms for the interaction of missile defense units when repelling an attack on (attention) Moscow, the option that everything would be intercepted was not even considered. So air defense is good, and a shelter wouldn't hurt...
  5. -9
    24 September 2019 17: 24
    well, not bad, not bad, we don’t sit in the hole like hamsters, but cheer up the Yemenite Hussites so that they and the Saud continue playing war games just like in Syria, the Jews play with us through a certain igil of course
  6. +21
    24 September 2019 17: 27
    . At the same time, the location of Russian aviation was constantly shown in the pictures taken by foreign spy satellites.

    1. -1
      24 September 2019 18: 41
      Who would doubt that.....
    2. -4
      24 September 2019 18: 53
      laughing good It is correct that Russia is "pressing" towards Israel .. Everything will be decided there, if anything ... hi
  7. -5
    24 September 2019 17: 41
    The Ministry of Defense made important conclusions for itself, taking into account the experience of operating equipment in Syrian conditions, and yet came to an unambiguous conclusion: protective hangars are needed.

    But these conclusions apparently only concern "Syrian" aircraft; the Russian Aerospace Forces do not fade in the sun and the rain does not affect them.
    1. -1
      24 September 2019 17: 58
      Do not grumble - take the money and pay for the hangars. Believe it will be cool ...
  8. 0
    24 September 2019 17: 42
    But if the warhead from the ax hits, suppose, in some sort of middle section - all the rest will not work out? Maybe, what is better, inflatable shelters?
    1. +4
      24 September 2019 17: 51
      Quote: mark1
      But if the warhead from the ax hits, suppose, in some sort of middle section - all the rest will not work out?

      Agree, it is unlikely that these hangars were designed based on the possible hit of a warhead from an ax.

      Even the most frostbitten "friends" still have enough gray cells not to think of the launch of "axes" on "Khmeimim" - otherwise, you can grab at least from the "Calibers".
      1. +1
        24 September 2019 18: 00
        God saves a safe person ...
      2. 0
        24 September 2019 18: 00
        An axe is a generalized concept (although one shouldn't renounce it), but for example, the cruise missiles from the Houthis (and these could be either new ones, which are now being bred, or old Chinese ones based on, for example, the P-15). To be honest, it looks more like a motor pool.
      3. 0
        24 September 2019 18: 25
        Volodin (Alexey)
        Agree, it is unlikely that these hangars were designed based on the possible hit of a warhead from an ax.
        Even the most frostbitten "friends" still have enough gray cells not to think of the launch of "axes" on "Khmeimim" - otherwise, you can grab at least from the "Calibers".
        So then it is, but it will not be easier for us. Because the possibilities on TVV are different. Therefore, it was necessary to approach more seriously. Long-term concrete arches, they withstood shelling with axes and disperse planes, it’s not Russian chance, but the setup is obtained.
    2. +1
      24 September 2019 18: 02
      mark1
      Why not immediately vigorous warhead? That's better? :-(
      What is your garage made of? Will it withstand a drone hit? Or do you have an air defense system there?
      1. +6
        24 September 2019 18: 12
        You see, in one case I alone will grieve for my "Varka", and in the second even you (I dare to assume) will drop a mean man's tear.
        1. +1
          24 September 2019 18: 23
          Quote: mark1
          You see, in one case I alone will grieve for my "Varka", and in the second even you (I dare to assume) will drop a mean man's tear.

          Sorry, please clarify: "Varka" is this a whetstone on wheels or the girl Varka forgotten in the garage? belay
          1. +9
            24 September 2019 18: 26
            What difference does it make, believe me, both will be missed.
            1. +2
              24 September 2019 18: 30
              The second is urgently released from under attack. smile
              1. +3
                24 September 2019 18: 35
                If only on the first - they are both dear to me.
    3. +1
      24 September 2019 19: 21
      Quote: mark1
      But if the warhead from the ax hits, suppose, in some sort of middle section - all the rest will not work out? Maybe, what is better, inflatable shelters?

      If an ax reaches there, these walls will least of all excite you in this life.
      1. 0
        24 September 2019 19: 43
        Yes, it’s for me that I’ll be warm and light for the airplanes (I hope only for them)
    4. 0
      24 September 2019 22: 05
      They won't fit together, the metal will break, about three pieces will be cut out, the rest will stand.
  9. +1
    24 September 2019 18: 18
    I did not understand about air conditioners. What is the use of them? As can be understood from the video, the hangars on both sides are completely open. Is the air outside cooling?
    1. +5
      24 September 2019 20: 34
      If in mind, air conditioning is needed for the equipment of the aircraft and for the pilot sitting in the cockpit. And not for the technique under this "awning".


      The editor crookedly recorded the interview record most likely.
  10. +2
    24 September 2019 18: 36
    Quote: mark1
    If only on the first - they are both dear to me.

    Is suitable hi laughing
  11. +3
    24 September 2019 19: 33
    What was the problem so far? Why, for example, should airplanes stand at other airfields, and not just in Syria. They took the SPHERA-1000 and riveted hangars, we used to use American machines, and now Chelyabinsk is releasing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. +3
    24 September 2019 21: 09
    Quote: _Ugene_
    The technician’s radio in his hand on 0: 30 - Baofeng UV-5R, on aliexpress a little more expensive than 1 thousand rubles. And according to reviews, they work noticeably better than what is available in the parts of our alleged production.

    Technicians use them as walkie-talkies, which they are, in fact, because they have been tested in this quality for a long time, they are so cheap and workable that they are practically free, and not because they have some "noticeably better characteristics."

    What else do technicians need for operational communications? Pass the important phrase "Bob, bring the key for ten", not amenable to cracking? Transfer data, communication with ACS? Shock-proof, moisture-proof? What are you trying to fantasize about?
  13. +1
    24 September 2019 21: 27
    And now aviation hangars have forgotten how to do. (based on the motif of the entertainments S.t.a.l.k. I thought by name what the caponiers did for explosion-proof aircraft, as they used to. Meter concrete 5 meters of land.
    1. 0
      25 September 2019 02: 33
      Quote: garri-lin
      And now aviation hangars have forgotten how to do. (based on the motif of the entertainments S.t.a.l.k. I thought by name what the caponiers did for explosion-proof aircraft, as they used to. Meter concrete 5 meters of land.

      I see, you do not peck chickens money? Or do we stay there to live? In addition, there are Syrian capital caponiers.
      1. +1
        25 September 2019 08: 07
        Mortar shelling and several damaged aircraft Remember?
  14. +1
    25 September 2019 02: 24
    Fig they schumacher from the hangar cheerfully taxi out ..
  15. +1
    25 September 2019 02: 30
    Quote: APASUS
    What was the problem so far? Why, for example, should airplanes stand at other airfields, and not just in Syria. They took the SPHERA-1000 and riveted hangars, we used to use American machines, and now Chelyabinsk is releasing

    Where to look for your hangar from SPHERE-1000 later, when Sushka taxies out of it? where will it fly?
    1. +1
      25 September 2019 18: 15
      Quote: ROSS_51
      Where to look for your hangar from SPHERE-1000 later, when Sushka taxies out of it? where will it fly?

      And if you try not to think a lot?

      In Malaysia does not blow

      In Iraq, too, are

      Well, it’s necessary in Belgium!
      1. 0
        26 September 2019 16: 08
        what are you inattentive here is the scope
        what is not your sphere
  16. 0
    25 September 2019 08: 46
    Why were they blinded in one pile?

    The buildings themselves are flimsy, one wall is common.
    Apparently they really did only protection from the sun, but not from attacks.
    I can’t understand why it’s still not dug in properly, because so much time has passed?
    1. 0
      26 September 2019 15: 05
      There is no place for Khmeimim .. And for a long time because they did not know for how long there ..
  17. 0
    25 September 2019 09: 11
    Sandstorms, high vapor salt air due to proximity to the Mediterranean Sea, direct sunlight did their job, damaged aircraft.

    Well, how can this canopy save you from dust and salt?
    Where is the concrete roof? This projectile will also be pierced by Katyusha.
  18. amr
    0
    25 September 2019 14: 06
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Were videos of the interception of missiles shells?

    Well, America does not offer so much money to help, which is probably why we cannot afford such expensive missiles, most likely the Pentagon does not offer us to pay for the video either!
    But anticipating your answer, it’s hard not to agree that if our officials hadn’t stolen less gas and oil ...
  19. +2
    26 September 2019 02: 47
    Quote: APASUS
    Quote: ROSS_51
    Where to look for your hangar from SPHERE-1000 later, when Sushka taxies out of it? where will it fly?

    And if you try not to think a lot?

    In Malaysia does not blow

    In Iraq, too, are

    Well, it’s necessary in Belgium!

    Thank you for the work done, but what do these hangars in the photo have to do with the cans from SPHERE-1000, about which you spoke?