The last Soyuz-FG launch vehicle was assembled at Baikonur

42
On Baikonur, the assembly of the last Soyuz-FG launch vehicle was completed, which is due to launch on September 25 into orbit with the Soyuz MS-15 manned spacecraft with astronauts on board. This was reported by the press service of Roscosmos.

The last Soyuz-FG launch vehicle was assembled at Baikonur




According to the state corporation, in the installation and test building of the cosmodrome the installation of the propulsion system of the emergency rescue system to the space head of the launch vehicle was completed, and work was also done on its docking with the third stage. At the final stage, a complete docking of all stages of the launch vehicle was carried out.

The Russian Space Agency said that the launch of the Soyuz-FG launch vehicle is scheduled for Wednesday. The rocket should put into orbit the Soyuz MS-15 manned spacecraft with the crew on board, which will include Russian Oleg Skrypochka, American Jessica Meir and the first cosmonaut of the United Arab Emirates, Khazza al-Mansouri.

The planned launch will be 70 and the last one for the Soyuz-FG launch vehicle with Ukrainian analog control, then all manned launches will be carried out on Soyuz-2.1 launch vehicles with a Russian-made digital control system.

It should be noted that Soyuz-FG launch vehicles are among the most reliable. During 18 years of operation, only one launch was unsuccessful when in October last year an accident occurred due to a malfunction of the first stage. Then the emergency rescue system worked and the crew survived.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 September 2019 09: 16
    Another small economic blow to the brothers.
    1. +7
      22 September 2019 09: 28
      Pessimist22 (Igor) Today, 09: 16 NEW
      +1
      Another small economic blow to the brothers.

      So they will put it out as I can! Clinic, in a word. wink
      "Well, crazy - what can you take!" V. Vysotsky.
    2. +11
      22 September 2019 09: 28
      Quote: Pessimist22
      Another small economic blow to the brothers.

      Let the Kazakhs fly into space. laughing .And then all of their rent was not enough, they were constantly blackmailing me with closure. How many things were abandoned there, you would have seen men .. They squeezed us out (not out in the open, but still)
      1. -1
        22 September 2019 10: 01
        And what about the Kazakhs? You are probably hinting at what I am writing from Kazakhstan?
        1. +3
          22 September 2019 10: 42
          Quote: Pessimist22
          And what about the Kazakhs?

          Well, I wrote above that the blackmail was a permanent lease of the spaceport (as it sounds RENT !!)))))
          Quote: Pessimist22
          You are probably hinting at what I am writing from Kazakhstan?

          Honestly, I didn’t know, but I also seem to be familiar with the Kazakhs and have many friends, but if something happens, it’s better not to turn your back ..
          In Soviet times this was not a sensation, but now alas soldier
          When I get angry (they poison us) and "imperial chauvinism" rushes out of my soul .. I watch and listen to this video .. And somehow I calm down hi

          Well, we live and do not separate us anyway ..
      2. +2
        22 September 2019 10: 30
        Quote: Kontrik
        Quote: Pessimist22
        Another small economic blow to the brothers.

        Let the Kazakhs fly into space. laughing .And then all of their rent was not enough, they were constantly blackmailing me with closure. How many things were abandoned there, you would have seen men .. They squeezed us out (not out in the open, but still)

        Let the Kazakhs fly into space
        Not their profile, and why do they need it if they do not set any tasks in space.
        .And then all of their rent was not enough
        Due to this, they supported their economy.
        constantly blackmailed by closing

        And what will it give them now, nothing. After leaving us, they will not be able to implement their projects anyway. If only they find someone to rent it out to, and then who needs it now, if China has already implemented cheap shipments, and besides them, there is someone who can do it.
        How many abandoned things would you see men

        As in other countries, after the collapse of the USSR.
        .. They squeezed us out (not in the open, but still)

        And it all began, back in the 90s.
        1. -1
          22 September 2019 20: 36
          Nonsense. See statistics. The budget of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 25 billion, and the rental of ALL objects by Russia in Kazakhstan is 115 million, incl. Baikonur, Sary-Shagan, etc. .. If you know how to count, then this is less than 1%. RK's GDP is more than 150 billion .. So what are you writing about?
          Well, and if you aren’t in the know, Kazakhstan is investing more than $ 0,5 billion in Baikonur and space projects .. By the way, where are our 220 million dollars that Roscosmos received for Baiterek, since you are so knowledgeable? It turned out that our satellite, which we ordered from you, worked much less than Russia gave guarantees - and so we had to work with the French in this direction.
          See also the Sunkar project (Soyuz-5), if you are so informed. hi
          1. +1
            23 September 2019 09: 04
            Complete nonsense.

            I completely agree that you are going further in the text.
            The budget of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 25 billion, and the rental of ALL objects by Russia in Kazakhstan is 115 million, incl. Baikonur, Sary-Shagan, etc. .. If you know how to count, then this is less than 1%. RK's GDP is more than 150bn ..
            And only you ships, you forgot to include all of our military units that are located there and the indicator increases immediately, but they also receive a large percentage of private launches, no need to distort the words.
            So what are you writing about?

            About what a person wrote above.
            Well, and if you are not in the know, Kazakhstan is investing over $ 0,5 billion in Baikonur and space projects.
            At the expense of the money that we give.
            By the way, where are our 220 million dollars that Roscosmos received for Baiterek, since you are so knowledgeable?
            Where they should be.
            It turned out that our satellite, which we ordered from you, worked much less than Russia gave guarantees - and so we had to work with the French in this direction.
            We ourselves are now at odds with how your companion could be if we sold you to him. And he worked much less because there was less flattery needed. And for his constant work professionals are needed.
            if you are so informed.

            There is one.
    3. +1
      22 September 2019 09: 30
      It’s rather Ukrainians
      themselves one more time with a head against the wall hit.
    4. +2
      22 September 2019 10: 12
      Quote: Pessimist22
      Another small economic blow to the brothers.

      Due to our part and the spaceport, they supported their economy.
      1. -3
        22 September 2019 10: 48
        Quote: SERGEY SERGEEVICS
        Due to our part and the spaceport, they supported their economy.

        Oil, gas, uranium and other rare-earth metals (explored and built by the Russians) .. Due to this, they live and pile up there (the rest is abandoned, especially the north of Kazakhstan)
        Without Russia, Kazakhstan would have long been devoured and slaughtered ... So it’s better to keep Kazakhs together!
        1. +2
          22 September 2019 10: 54
          Quote: Kontrik
          Quote: SERGEY SERGEEVICS
          Due to our part and the spaceport, they supported their economy.

          Oil, gas, uranium and other rare-earth metals (explored and built by the Russians) .. Due to this, they live and pile up there (the rest is abandoned, especially the north of Kazakhstan)
          Without Russia, Kazakhstan would have long been devoured and slaughtered ... So it’s better to keep Kazakhs together!

          Only now, all this, China has already acquired, and they are only losing interest.
          Without Russia, Kazakhstan would have long been devoured and slaughtered.

          Well, if you yourself write that they push us away, then it turns out that they themselves go about it and then this will be their problem, forcibly them, no one will keep.
          So it’s better to keep together Kazakhs!

          Everything is correctly written, but by force, there is no sense in keeping them.
          1. -3
            22 September 2019 12: 02
            If this happens, it will be a worse problem for Russia than Ukraine. And if you do not understand this, then look at the map and roughly estimate the options. and if it doesn’t reach you again, then I think the leadership of Russia understands this perfectly.
            1. -2
              22 September 2019 12: 49
              Quote: Quper
              If this happens, it will be a worse problem for Russia than Ukraine. And if you do not understand this, then look at the map and roughly estimate the options. and if it doesn’t reach you again, then I think the leadership of Russia understands this perfectly.

              If this happens, it will be a worse problem for Russia than Ukraine.

              What exactly will happen, specifically write about it? What’s worse will happen to them, but they themselves will not have problems from this, probably in the first place, they, the worse themselves will have problems.
              . And if you do not understand this, then look at the map and roughly estimate the options.

              What is it?
              then look at the map
              here is a map for more details please.
              roughly estimate options.
              Which ones? There are many options, write specifically what.
              and if it doesn’t reach you again, then I think the leadership of Russia understands this perfectly.
              What exactly ?
              Write specific words, not the rumors that come from you, here are comments, not a guessing from obscure words.
              1. -1
                24 September 2019 21: 26
                You don’t give a penny of money. Your "money" came in the form of barter. For example, for the lease of Baikonur, "killed" Su-27s received, which were then repaired. Your pilots were ashamed to hand over this stuff to us, because they were hired to fly them. There weren't any of our own back then.
                Do you offer me to read Kontrik’s comments (aka Mikhan, etc.)? He has already reincarnated ten times in VO. I’m not even going to comment on such a stupid person. And you become like him. All the best.
                1. 0
                  25 September 2019 18: 03
                  Quote: Kasym
                  You don’t give a penny of money. Your "money" came in the form of barter. For example, for the lease of Baikonur, "killed" Su-27s received, which were then repaired. Your pilots were ashamed to hand over this stuff to us, because they were hired to fly them. There weren't any of our own back then.
                  Do you offer me to read Kontrik’s comments (aka Mikhan, etc.)? He has already reincarnated ten times in VO. I’m not even going to comment on such a stupid person. And you become like him. All the best.

                  Personally, I don’t propose anything to anyone or impose anyone’s comments, these are your fantasies and nothing more.
          2. 0
            22 September 2019 20: 41
            Why comment, if not in the know, Sergey Sergeyevich? They receive less than 2 million tons of oil from us. Any questions? They buy uranium and coal, but practically do not own any deposits. Still need information? hi
            On Baikonur your power since the collapse of the Union. Laws, power, incl. prosecutors and the police. Even number 94 is available - the code of the territorial unit of the Russian Federation (vehicles under this number are registered).
            1. -1
              23 September 2019 08: 43
              They receive less than 2 million tons of oil from us. Any questions? They buy uranium and coal, but practically do not own deposits
              I wrote about this a little higher, you write again not in your own words, but mine, which were taken higher from the text.
              Still need information?
              Sure! just not in my words from my text, but come up with something of your own.
              Why comment, if not in the know, Sergey Sergeyevich?
              Write always in essence and then to you, in general there will be no complaints.
              On Baikonur your power since the collapse of the Union. Laws, power, incl. prosecutors and the police. Even number 94 is available - the code of the territorial unit of the Russian Federation (vehicles under this number are registered).
              Naturally, all this will be, because, all military units there are assigned to us. These are our military units and our laws are there, it cannot be otherwise.
              1. -1
                23 September 2019 20: 13
                Site 45 has already been transferred to Kazakhstan for repair and modernization. Most likely, the launch of heavy and super-heavy launch vehicles will be at Baikonur. Arguments of the Week of 21 August. Interview with Vitaly Aleksandrovich Lopota (General Designer of RSC Energia) wink
  2. 0
    22 September 2019 09: 25
    The planned launch will be the 70th and the last for the Soyuz-FG launch vehicle with Ukrainian analog control, further, all manned launches will be carried out on Soyuz-2.1a launch vehicles with a Russian-made digital control system.

    We got rid of the unnecessary in this industry. Let them prepare their "analogue" for Mars ... well, or for the Moon as a last resort. laughing
  3. 0
    22 September 2019 09: 29
    It is high time. Let them jump on. Still to them to block gas and coal. It is necessary to offer the pan-cookers to give Donbass and Lugansk for debts. Anyway, we won’t see the money ..
    1. +6
      22 September 2019 11: 20
      It is high time. Let them jump on

      You can ask a question, this article is about a Russian spaceship on board which is a Russian, an Arab, and a US citizen.
      Well, tell me, WHY ?, where does Ukraine, Donbass and Lugansk?
      Are you familiar with the concept of "semantic word field"? tell me, where is at least some kind of relationship between the words "assembly of the last launch vehicle" and "Ukraine"?
      We go further, from simple to complex forms of speech utterance.
      Tell me, are the complex syntactic structures or semantic inversions of this article at least somehow related to the pots on the head except that they are vaguely reminiscent of a space helmet, albeit very remotely, if we allow a clearly effective type of perception?
      About such things as understanding the components of a speech utterance, understanding the meaning of a complex sentence (text and subtext), and even more so about discursive thinking and inference operations, I don’t even want to stutter.
      But on the merits of the topic I’ll talk with pleasure:
      Let’s say about Khaz al-Mansouri. How is he to you?
      For example, I liked him: he is an F-16 pilot, all the time he has been assembled and attentive, he is very serious about business, has an excellent education, is comprehensively developed, at the same time is very contact and simple. In addition to his native Arabic, he speaks English and Russian (though at the household level, but does not require translator work if complex explanations are not given). He loves National Geographic magazine in Arabic - by the way, it was very interesting to look through it, although it is not clear.
      If we talk about Al-Neyyadi, it is much simpler and compared to Mansouri it is somewhat carefree, although it also has a degree and is well prepared.
      If the Arabs continue their program, Neyadi will be next, but he is actually ready, if there would be money and a political decision by the emirates to continue cooperation.
      If you don’t want about the Arabs, let’s talk about Jessica Meir, about the FG Union or any other topic related to astronautics, otherwise you have the impression that you have nothing more to discuss besides Ukraine.
      1. +2
        22 September 2019 11: 43
        Hi

        Neuilly understudy? Also from aviation?
        1. +2
          22 September 2019 13: 20
          Neuilly understudy? Also from aviation?

          Hi, yes, Neiyadi understudy, but they prepared equally if today is Mansuri training, then tomorrow Neiyadi. And then the hierarchy is according to unwritten rules: at launch N1 you are an understudy, which means that at N2 you are basically a crew. In addition, there are rumors that the Arabs will continue to cooperate with us, and this, accordingly, new launches.
          Mansouri is definitely an F16 pilot, but Neyadi is no longer there; he is like an IT programmer. Therefore, the aviation and military past of the astronauts is immediately visible to the naked eye, even in their relation. It’s the same with the Americans, take the same McClain with her combat experience in Iraq as a helicopter pilot. From that mile away I felt hostility and a strange chill, either in the shower or on the back. In addition, a lesbian about (what everyone knows) and an exhibitionist - take my word for it))))
      2. 0
        22 September 2019 13: 03
        It’s very cool how people of different specialties look at the same news. Personally, as a techie, I saw this information in this article, although for me it’s not new:
        1. So far, the management system in the Unions has been analog
        2. This system was produced in Ukraine (that's where the word Ukraine comes from)
        3. As you know, Russia has certain problems with Ukraine - this is not in the article, but as if implied
        4. Developing the old analogue system of Russia in production is useless - this is also not in the article, but techies understand this
        5. A new digital control system has been developed.
        6. This system is designed and manufactured in Russia
        7. Ukraine has lost another small piece of real participation in space programs

        Tell me, complex syntactic structures or semantic inversions of this article are at least somehow connected with pots on the head

        I answer - if there were no pots on the head, there would be no p. 3 and, accordingly, p. 7. It seems to be all. How do you like this semantic inversion?
      3. -1
        22 September 2019 15: 34
        You apparently do not know that Ukraine supplied a lot of equipment for Roscosmos. And only after a series of Proton falls and the failures of the Unions, they began to refuse their products. But they did not compensate the damage, as did the loan. Anestand Yu?
        1. 0
          22 September 2019 20: 59
          Quote: Dzafdet
          And only after a series of Proton falls and the failures of the Unions, they began to refuse their products.

          fool
          A bit of feminine logic:
          - Damn, what should I tell him now?
          - The truth.
          - Which one?
          - Well, I don’t know ... Think of something ...
  4. 0
    22 September 2019 09: 31
    Purchased "with a margin" ... Why waste? Let it fly. Last time. There is no reason to simply write off good devices and systems. We are not VNA, which, for the sake of politics, constantly "shoots itself in the foot" and "freezes ears"!
  5. +2
    22 September 2019 09: 51
    EXPLANATORY, electronics gathered at the SOVIET element base. We won everything (with the permission of the military representatives), wherever we found it.
    Now there are not many enterprises that produced all this.
    1. 0
      22 September 2019 10: 33
      Now there are not many enterprises that produced all this.

      But then there were others who replaced them. sad
  6. 0
    22 September 2019 10: 22
    "The right way" and "wide strides", the "non-brothers" are jumping to the "beautiful far away" hoping to turn into a great "agrarian superpower"!))
  7. 0
    22 September 2019 10: 24
    Quote: Kontrik
    Quote: Pessimist22
    Another small economic blow to the brothers.

    Let the Kazakhs fly into space. laughing .And then all of their rent was not enough, they were constantly blackmailing me with closure. How many things were abandoned there, you would have seen men .. They squeezed us out (not out in the open, but still)


    While the "great" Nazarbayev needs to hang noodles on the ears of his people that Kazakhstan is not just a great country But the space power Baikonur will live. Then I think the Chinese will take away their credit debts, well, as usual Russia will leave him sooner or later. I think the terms have already been determined in the Kremlin. We simply will not know them until the very fact of leaving. It seems to me these screams about the Eastern That everything was lost there everything was plundered This is a tricky move To calm down both the Kazakhs and all the rest Type with space in Russia
  8. -1
    22 September 2019 10: 35
    "Soyuz-2.1a" with a Russian-made digital control system

    I would like to know, Russian-made or Russian assembly? On whose element base is this digital control system made?
    1. +1
      22 September 2019 10: 46
      Quote: Piramidon
      "Soyuz-2.1a" with a Russian-made digital control system

      I would like to know, Russian-made or Russian assembly? On whose element base is this digital control system made?

      In exactly the same way as the Stripovskaya assembly is now underway, striped ones are probably made at their base, and Chinese parts go straight.
    2. 0
      23 September 2019 10: 44
      Something NGOA riveted there, which rivets for the ICBMs. So it’s clearly made from our element base ...
  9. +3
    22 September 2019 12: 14
    Quote: Bshkaus
    You can ask a question, this article is about a Russian spaceship on board which is a Russian, an Arab, and a US citizen.
    Well, tell me, WHY ?, where does Ukraine, Donbass and Lugansk?

    Well, Ukraine, as it were, AND WHY. This carrier is the last with the UKRAINIAN analog control system. Well, then, how can you talk about Ukraine and not go to Donbass and Lugansk. Tradition however

    Quote: NN52
    Hi

    Neuilly understudy? Also from aviation?

    Techie. Information Security Specialist
  10. +1
    22 September 2019 12: 20
    Interestingly, the planned transition from one type of launch vehicle to another in manned launches is presented here as a rejection of foreign components. Yeah
    1. 0
      22 September 2019 13: 05
      Probably a little bit wrong. If Ukraine has experience in the creation and production of analog systems, they could participate in the creation of digital. And they won’t. Personally, as I understand it.
      1. +1
        22 September 2019 13: 43
        Quote: mister-red
        Probably a little bit wrong.


        The Soyuz-2.1a rocket was created more than 10 years ago. There, initially SU was made by NGOA.
  11. +1
    22 September 2019 13: 20
    Well done guys, clear skies! good
  12. -2
    22 September 2019 13: 45
    "Leap" from the "damned" Soviet legacy to the "Rogozinsky trampoline". But once "Unions" were the most reliable in the world.
  13. 0
    23 September 2019 16: 17
    Is the Soyuz-FG a moss-colored rocket? laughing