Military Review

The Ministry of Defense posted on the web a video of the shooting of ships of the Northern Fleet

22
A video of firing ships of the Arctic grouping of the North appeared on the Web fleet in the area of ​​the Franz Josef Land archipelago in the north of the Barents Sea. The large anti-submarine ship Vice Admiral Kulakov and the BDK Alexander Otrakovsky and Kondopoga took part in the firing exercises.


The Ministry of Defense posted on the web a video of the shooting of ships of the Northern Fleet


According to the Ministry of Defense, the grouping of ships of the Northern Fleet worked out on exercises to repel an enemy air attack from various heights. To repulse the conditional enemy’s attacks, the crews of the Vice Admiral Kulakov and Alexander Otrakovsky and Kondopoga BKK used the Dagger anti-aircraft missile systems, AK-100, AK-725 artillery systems and the AK-630 anti-aircraft system. Shooting took place in stormy conditions with sea waves up to 4 points and gusty wind.

The crews of the large anti-submarine ship "Vice Admiral Kulakov", the large landing ships "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Kondopoga" worked off the reflection of airborne attack assets of a conditional enemy from various heights and directions

- said in a statement.

In addition, the ship's crews worked out the production of passive and active jamming by electronic warfare systems, and the crew of Vice Admiral Kulakov worked out deep-bomb rocket firing at a conditional enemy submarine.

22 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Voyager
    Voyager 22 September 2019 08: 28
    +8
    I still can't get used to the fact that we now have several "Daggers". Sleep is dangerous to read laughing
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 September 2019 08: 29
    +7
    It looks very convincing. Yes, against the backdrop of such weather!
  3. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 22 September 2019 08: 37
    +5
    Impressive!
  4. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
    SERGEY SERGEEVICS 22 September 2019 09: 00
    +1
    An excellent indicator of strength, fire and power.
    1. novel66
      novel66 22 September 2019 09: 39
      0
      yes .. but in the phrase "to reflect the attack from the ZRAK" you hear something indecent lol
      1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
        SERGEY SERGEEVICS 22 September 2019 09: 58
        +2
        Quote: novel xnumx
        yes .. but in the phrase "to reflect the attack from the ZRAK" you hear something indecent lol

        There is a laughing
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 22 September 2019 09: 03
    +4
    What can I say? If you shoot badly, they will sink you. Therefore, the study should be constant, and brought to the machine.
  6. lopuhan2006
    lopuhan2006 22 September 2019 09: 30
    -10
    Everything is fine and beautiful, of course, but only the logs, and the stealth, accompanied by false targets and tricks, will only fly on the ships at first. And there will be no chance against that. Only accompanied and undercover. In the meantime, we have a surface fleet against Romania, Poland, and so on. And with Japan, there are already sooooo big problems. Let's hope.......
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 22 September 2019 09: 45
      -5
      Quote: lopuhan2006
      Everything is fine and beautiful, of course, but only the logs, and the stealth, accompanied by false targets and tricks, will only fly on the ships at first.

      Worse than our KC did not see anyone in IKO, and this is tin
      1. RideMaster
        RideMaster 22 September 2019 15: 38
        +1
        To decrypt, otherwise I remembered about kin dza dza.
  7. Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 22 September 2019 09: 43
    +3
    Quote: lopuhan2006
    Everything is fine and beautiful, of course, but only the logs, and the stealth, accompanied by false targets and tricks, will only fly on the ships at first. And there will be no chance against that. Only accompanied and undercover. In the meantime, we have a surface fleet against Romania, Poland, and so on. And with Japan, there are already sooooo big problems. Let's hope.......

    It is for this that nuclear weapons exist. What problems will Japan have if it attacks us? How many rockets do you need? Two? One? This of course does not mean that it is not necessary to develop the rest of the armaments - it is necessary, even as it should. But it doesn’t always work out as you want, despite the fact that not only with us, but with everyone.
    1. RideMaster
      RideMaster 22 September 2019 15: 41
      -6
      You are not logical cheers patriots.
      If the hope is only for yao, then is this shooting just a show? Outdated weapons.
      I don’t understand today. Does anyone really think that artillery is useful in modern combat?
      The Gorshkovs still can go a lot. And these BPCs are not residents and confusion at the moment.
      1. lopuhan2006
        lopuhan2006 22 September 2019 17: 57
        -5
        A frantic and with bulging eyes will yell Khibin, nuclear weapons, Dagger ...... Only carriers Daggers 10 pieces, Khibiny on the Su-24 was not S-400 without long missiles, the latest minesweepers with old trawls, etc.
        1. bayard
          bayard 22 September 2019 18: 40
          +1
          Quote: lopuhan2006
          Only carriers of Daggers 10 pieces,

          This year ago there were so many of them, and during this time a lot of things happened.
          1. lopuhan2006
            lopuhan2006 22 September 2019 19: 15
            0
            What happened? 3 more added? Were they just embarrassed? The fact that the fleet does not have its own aviation, that there are no minesweepers and PLO aircraft, that there is no submarine detection system at distant approaches, I am generally silent about submarines.
            1. bayard
              bayard 22 September 2019 20: 32
              +2
              Quote: lopuhan2006
              What happened? 3 more added?

              Why three? Last year, the troops received 31 MiG-20s. How many of them in the "K" modification were not reported, but definitely not three. It is necessary to have 4 such special-purpose squadrons (South-West direction, North-West (SF), Primorye and Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky). And nothing prevents these squadrons from deploying. Presumably, one such squadron will be deployed every year.
              And the fleet has a lot of things missing. And for a long time to be missed - the fleet will be built for a long time. But the fact that exercises are underway in the operating fleet, ships in service, improve their combat skills, conduct firing, and military campaigns — that’s good.
              Both minesweepers are being built, anti-submarine aircraft undergo modernization (and are returning to the practice of searching for enemy submarines by the ring effect), and new warships are being laid ... I will not repeat about the fact that all programs got up due to the lack of their own power plants for ships under construction - This topic has eaten through all my ears, since the question is now almost (everything is not clear so far on diesels of the entire assortment) it has been resolved.
              And what are the problems in maritime aviation? New air regiments are being restored and formed, the Su-30 and the unfused Tu-22M3 enter service. If the RF Ministry of Defense has an American military budget, of course everything went happier, but if there is something and what is spent rationally, the army is progressively re-equipping ... and the naval programs have been slowed down since 2014 (and also on the construction of new nuclear submarines ), because the probability of a real war arose. On the European theater. And the Army is more important for us than the fleet for a future conflict ... Well, sanctions did their job - ships without a power plant cannot be built.
              1. lopuhan2006
                lopuhan2006 23 September 2019 02: 35
                -6
                Right now I’ll pay with happiness, as beautifully written) 20 pieces that lose their direct functions as an interceptor, but become the carrier of 1 (one) missile ..... against 200 that are of the 5th generation, moreover, combatant, and not experienced. Then we go: minesweepers in the current configuration without full-fledged unmanned systems are simply armed boats, Novella is far from a panacea, the typical composition of the ships being laid down and recently entered shows a complete discord in the minds of admirals (some 386s are standing), Su-30 in the amount of two squadrons for 3 fleets ?!, with the Tu-22M without question (they finally gave the boom, etc.), but there are no naval Su-34s, there are simply no words about the Be-12 modernization, but the Mi-14 and Ka-29 seem to have flown away, although it was their characteristics You can still give an example, but this is an endless list! Your comment as a doctor’s words for your grandmother - everything will be fine, just don’t worry!))) What you tried to translate into positive turned out to be alas unconvincing.
                1. Crimean partisan 1974
                  Crimean partisan 1974 23 September 2019 09: 01
                  +1
                  .on contrast to 200, which are the 5th generation, and drill, ..... according to the performance characteristics of the so-called 5th generation, you can only laugh. The EPR signature is known, so there are no invisibility in nature, especially since the air defense tasks are carried out in a complex
                  minesweepers in the current configuration ..... I dare to assure you that since the appearance of hydrophones, minesweepers haven’t changed anything, which is at least 100 years in the afternoon, you know how much you’ve improved the mover but the nuclear reactor makes a whistle from pumping outboard water for an okhl reactor, moreover, long antennas with thermal sensors tightly track the thermal footprint from the pumped water of the nuclear submarines, no need to dramatize, diesel-electric submarines are somewhat more complicated but they are coastal
                  but there are no naval Su-34s, ...... I don’t know how you have it, but we have it in the Crimea, and according to the developers, there is X-29 from the weapons rating, evil tongues say that they are cooler in the ratings than X-29, there is no smoke without fire
                  but the Mi-14 and Ka-29 seem to have flown off, ...... I don’t know, the Mi-14 cannot be distinguished from the Mi-8 in the air, but Kasiki fly regularly, it can even be a bearing from 4 cars, and when the Ka-52 go shoals generally an indescribable sight
    2. lopuhan2006
      lopuhan2006 22 September 2019 18: 04
      -4
      Are you seriously? Those for the Su-24 had to be erased by Ankara? You are already with your nuclear weapons like Porthos with your transport, the outside is gold, and the back is a rag. For people like you, they’re letting out such videos. Clinic....
  8. glk63
    glk63 22 September 2019 10: 25
    +2
    So everything is beautiful) It is not clear only whether all this has got to where? .. And yes, it’s impressive.
  9. senima56
    senima56 22 September 2019 12: 48
    0
    It is finally shown that our Navy can shoot not only in calm weather! hi
  10. 3vs
    3vs 22 September 2019 14: 40
    +2
    Sharp rockets! yes