The fourth "Rook" for the protection of the Crimean bridge launched

43
A ceremony of launching the fourth anti-sabotage boat Grachonok for the Kerch brigade of the Russian Guard guarding the Crimean bridge was held at the Vympel shipbuilding plant Vympel. This was reported by the press service of the shipyard.

The fourth "Rook" for the protection of the Crimean bridge launched




The fourth and last in the Grachonok series of anti-sabotage boats, built in the interests of the Federal Service of the Russian Guard under the contract for the supply of four boats for the Kerch Brigade, guarding the Crimean Bridge, was launched at the Rybinsk Shipyard. The contract was concluded at the end of the 2017 year with the delivery date for the boats by November 1 2019 year.

As stated in the brigade, all boats will be commissioned before the end of this year.

A special team of the Russian Guard, created to protect the Crimean bridge, is deployed in Kerch and has a large arsenal of funds designed to prevent sabotage from both water and land.

The 21980 anti-sabotage boat "Rook" is designed to combat submarine sabotage forces and means to support the actions of combat swimmers in the water area of ​​the basing station and on the approaches to it. Able to be autonomously at sea for up to five days with a cruising range of up to 200 nautical miles. Crew - 8 man.

Displacement - about 140 t, length - 30 m, width - 7,3 m, draft - 1,8 m
Full speed - knot 23
Navigation range - 200 miles
Autonomy - 5 days
Crew - 8 man
Armament: one 14,5-mm MTPU machine-gun unit, one DP-64 anti-sabotage grenade launcher, one DP-65 anti-sabotage grenade launcher, four Igla-type MANPADS.

Electronic weapons: NRS MP-231, GAS Kalmar, OGAS Anapa.
  • http://www.rybinsknote.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    20 September 2019 09: 26
    Well handsome. good As far as I see, I admire so much. Yes and TTX in perfect order
    1. +3
      20 September 2019 09: 33
      Yes and TTX in perfect order

      But I found the interesting information on import substitution from Wiki:
      The power plant of the boat consists of two diesel-gear units based on diesel engines of a German company MTU Friedrichshafen. After the German company stopped delivering its engines to Russia at the end of 2014, the engine supplier became Chinese company Henan Diesel Engine Industry Co. Ltd.. Two sets of engines for boats under construction at the Rybinsk Shipyard "Vympel" under the head. No. 01221 and 01222 have already been delivered through Marine Propulsion Systems LLC. The new power plant consists of the main engines TBD620V12, two reverse gears and two elastic couplings for connecting to the engine flywheel [1]. Auxiliary diesel generators DGA-100-V-A1-MPS from Marine Propulsion Systems LLC were installed.

      The Germans were replaced by the Chinese, that's the whole tale about import substitution sad

      The funny thing is, DG is sold on alibaba:
      https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.russian.alibaba.com/amp/p-detail/60402315499.html

      And it was possible to adapt the Kolomna 12CHN26 / 28 for the sea ...
      http://www.kolomnadiesel.com/catalog/detail.php?ID=1069
      1. +5
        20 September 2019 09: 37
        Quote: Sharky
        The Germans were replaced by the Chinese, that's the whole tale about import substitution

        You know, I still believe that we will learn how to make our engines no worse. After all, we have talented people
        1. -3
          20 September 2019 09: 42
          But there are no such people in the State Duma
          1. +2
            20 September 2019 09: 43
            Quote: Mylenef
            But there are no such people in the State Duma

            Well, after all, they will not be made there
            1. -5
              20 September 2019 09: 46
              To do something, you need a will to create, but it doesn’t exist
              1. 0
                20 September 2019 23: 43
                And the will to build is visible in the liberal party a la NAVALNYATA? Give us power, and we will FIND you ????? You are some kind of dumb :(
          2. -2
            20 September 2019 09: 45
            Is the State Duma a branch of the engine design bureau?
        2. +3
          20 September 2019 09: 48
          You know, I still believe that we will learn how to make our engines no worse. After all, we have talented people


          So the funny thing is that I already have my own, I brought the link above to Kolomna 12CHN26 / 28.
          We do our own, but we buy Chinese. Why?
          1. +1
            20 September 2019 09: 49
            Quote: Sharky
            We do our own, but we buy Chinese. Why?

            This is beyond my understanding lol
            1. +3
              20 September 2019 11: 24
              This is beyond my understanding

              That's above mine drinks
              1. 0
                20 September 2019 11: 46
                Quote: Sharky
                That's above mine

                Well tady flinched drinks
          2. +5
            20 September 2019 10: 01
            Because Kolomna to the eyeballs has been contracted with Russian Railways, there are no physical capacities there to increase volumes.
            1. -1
              20 September 2019 11: 47
              Because Kolomna to the eyeballs is contracted with Russian Railways

              I always thought that the “defense industry” is more important. Who prioritized this?
              1. +4
                20 September 2019 15: 18
                Quote: Sharky
                I always thought that the “defense industry” is more important. Who prioritized this?

                Market decided. ©
                The private trader is interested in what makes a profit. Sculpting serial engines for Russian Railways one by one is profitable. And to do it in small series or even single orders of a diesel engine for the fleet with its epic requirements - they need it, such hemorrhoids for their own money? So they rolled out the "diesel" 16D49 in the naval - either take it or leave, there will be no other. At 20380 with Kolomna diesel engines, 5 years after the delivery to the fleet, the power plant was being finalized - and still there were failures and fires.
                Actually, the MTU in the fleet appeared precisely after the close acquaintance of the surface troops with the products of Kolomna.
                1. 0
                  20 September 2019 21: 40
                  And to make a small series or even single orders of diesel for the fleet with its epic requirements - do they need it, such hemorrhoids for their own money?

                  You write correctly. In such cases, the state needs to subsidize and assist in the production of marine ICEs. Order development in the end. They decided not to create an engine in an empty field. This is logical from my point of view. Moreover, in the future this ICE can be modified for ordinary ships. The price will be lower than for the Navy. But why support domestic production? It is not necessary at all from their point of view ... And when the rooster pecks (relations with China, for example), then they will cry with a broken trough. And no one will be imprisoned for this, mind you.
            2. +3
              20 September 2019 15: 53
              So power needs to be developed. Do we have enough territory for this?
              But I think that, first of all, desire is not enough for this. And it usually appears after a magic kick from the Kremlin.
          3. +2
            20 September 2019 10: 17
            We do our own, but we buy Chinese. Why?

            either by performance characteristics are not suitable or by the timing of production. the latter is found all the time - it seems that the price may be normal and the logistics convenient. But the timing of production is inconsistent. As usual, you need it yesterday, and they promise you in a couple of years, and then on condition (and then the list is on 2 sheets of A4 format)
          4. +1
            20 September 2019 11: 10
            Not so straightforward .... equality of declared characteristics does not mean similarity.
            Zaporozhets is also "a five-seater car with four wheels." But ...
            1. +2
              20 September 2019 11: 51
              equality of declared characteristics does not mean similarity.

              I understand you. But, when they trumpeted about import substitution on every corner ... did this mean adapting domestic developments to a specific task with the consequent modifications and alterations for their own, and not for Chinese ... or do I not understand something about import substitution? request
        3. +1
          20 September 2019 12: 14
          Quote: Lipchanin
          that we learn how to do our engines no worse.

          We have been studying since the beginning of the last century and still nothing. A stone flower does not come out in the form of a worthy internal combustion engine, whether it is an automobile or any other. People are really talented, but everything breaks down on "market relations".
      2. +1
        20 September 2019 10: 33
        I wonder why "rooks" are still not "named". "Give joy and a name to each launch!" - we are now being taught to do this.
      3. +1
        20 September 2019 21: 26
        On the A40 there should be two * Scania * standing. What-in fact, how to bring-tell.
    2. +1
      20 September 2019 09: 38
      Quote: Lipchanin
      Well handsome.

      good
      Quote: Lipchanin
      Yes and TTX in perfect order

      but not here ..... he needs speed more
      1. +1
        20 September 2019 09: 41
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        but not here ..... he needs speed more

        But it seems to me not so critical. He will be guarding the bridge, and not chasing poachers across the seas. And to protect primarily from saboteurs of submariners.
    3. 0
      20 September 2019 12: 19
      Quote: Lipchanin
      Well handsome. good As far as I see, I admire so much. Yes and TTX in perfect order

      The only strange thing is that the coloring is borderline. They want to intimidate Ukrainians in advance after Kerch’s last time? Could have come up with something of your own.
      1. 0
        20 September 2019 12: 23
        Quote: Marconi41
        last time at Kerch?

        So they were going to do a similar number. Nat was invited. Merkel sent them a forest, and they calmed down
  2. +2
    20 September 2019 09: 29
    And call this "Rook" "Krymchonok" .. And let it always be 7 feet under the keel.
  3. -2
    20 September 2019 09: 31
    Is it a non-magnetic body? And then you can expect everything from our "druzhbanov"! angry
  4. -2
    20 September 2019 09: 33
    I would also like to add a depth bomb, the radius of defeat of swimmers will be more serious.
    1. +3
      20 September 2019 09: 59
      Yeah. It’s better to suspend Poseidon right away ... Bridge protection ship = to undermine your bridge deep?
    2. +2
      20 September 2019 10: 40
      So he has grenade launchers, why else store GB?
  5. +3
    20 September 2019 10: 43
    So the question is, why is this division of the National Guard on boats needed? It turns out that we have a fleet in the Crimea, it has its own ships for gullies, there are border guards with its ships for gullies, and now the National Guard with its ships for the same gullies. Well, why is it?
    1. +3
      20 September 2019 11: 45
      In order not to find responsible in case of something. And then create a single center to coordinate the actions of all security structures. The official on the official and the official drives.
    2. +2
      20 September 2019 15: 28
      Quote: Meliodous
      So the question is, why is this division of the National Guard on boats needed? It turns out that we have a fleet in the Crimea, it has its own ships for gullies, there are border guards with its ships for gullies, and now the National Guard with its ships for the same gullies. Well, why is it?

      Then, why in the USSR there were two naval detachments of patrol ships (boats) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR — for the complete closure by the forces of exclusively of the perimeter of naval facilities guarded by explosives. So that there is no streamer: the Vovans nod at the border guards, the border guards - at the screws, the screws - at the Vovans, As a result, no one is to blame - but there is no object. smile
      "Wet" vovans guard bridges on the Amur and nearby, the Atomflot base in Murmansk and the nuclear power plant in Sosnovy Bor. Now they have also hung the Bridge on them.
  6. 0
    20 September 2019 11: 04
    Quote: Lipchanin
    Quote: Sharky
    The Germans were replaced by the Chinese, that's the whole tale about import substitution

    You know, I still believe that we will learn how to make our engines no worse. After all, we have talented people


    You don’t have to believe in it. We can design the engines more accurately and we can do it very well. But the trouble is that we can’t do anything worthwhile by profucing machine tools. And we don’t sell the machines and equipment we need for this. The whole circle closed
    1. 0
      20 September 2019 11: 49
      Quote: Vzdrincher
      But the trouble is that profukav machine tool industry

      We had such a machine tool ....
      1. +2
        20 September 2019 12: 17
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Quote: Vzdrincher
        But the trouble is that profukav machine tool industry

        We had such a machine tool ....

        And there were so many of them in Moscow! Everything, not one has been working for a long time. Now there are shopping centers and amusement parks, and the automatic plant (a branch of the "Red Proletarian") on the street. Butlerov was given out in parts for rent, since the beginning of the 90s.
        1. +2
          20 September 2019 12: 20
          Yes, everything was destroyed then, to which the handles reached am
      2. The comment was deleted.
  7. -2
    20 September 2019 11: 39
    The 21980 anti-sabotage boat "Rook" is designed to combat submarine sabotage forces and means to support the actions of combat swimmers in the water area of ​​the basing station and on the approaches to it. Able to be autonomously at sea for up to five days with a cruising range of up to 200 nautical miles. Crew - 8 man.

    It will fit the poachers (Koreans) in the Far East to drive.
    But what about his seaworthiness?
    1. 0
      20 September 2019 15: 45
      Quote: lucul
      It will fit the poachers (Koreans) in the Far East to drive.

      Whom to drive? This is not a border guard, but a Russian guard. Its main task is to guard the Crimean bridge. In the Navy - This is a boat against PDSS. FSB FS refused this boat.
  8. +1
    20 September 2019 15: 12
    Quote: Sharky
    They replaced the Germans with the Chinese, that's the whole tale about import substitution :(

    This data is 5 years old, a lot is changing. Work on creating their own engines for ships of all classes is progressing at a good pace. A large part of the needs are already covered by domestic products.
  9. +2
    20 September 2019 15: 16
    Quote: Sharky
    You know, I still believe that we will learn how to make our engines no worse. After all, we have talented people


    So the funny thing is that I already have my own, I brought the link above to Kolomna 12CHN26 / 28.
    We do our own, but we buy Chinese. Why?

    Because the Chinese engine is a copy of the German Deutz. The manufacturer of boats claims that a commission was created, went through many engine options, stopped while on this copy of a German.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"