Tehran accuses US of intervening in Syria and attempting to start a war against Iran

20
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi commented on publications by individual media outlets that pointed to possible negotiations between Donald Trump and Hassan Rouhani on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

Tehran accuses US of intervening in Syria and attempting to start a war against Iran




Earlier, the possibility of such a meeting was made by Trump himself, but after the attack on oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, the US president began to talk about the possibility of "taking military measures against Iran." Recall that messages from the Hussites (or supposedly from the Hussites) appeared in the network, in which they take responsibility for attacking themselves at the refineries in Saudi Arabia.

According to Abbas Mousavi, today there is no talk about the agenda of the meeting between the presidents of Iran and the United States. According to the Iranian diplomat, the Iranian president will meet with other world leaders.

Against this background, Hassan Rowhani himself accused the United States of violating international standards by provocations. According to the Iranian president, the US contingent has no right to be present in Syria. Rowhani recalled that Americans did not give such a right to either the UN or Damascus.

Rouhani before flying to Turkey, where the Turkish-Iranian-Russian negotiations will be held to resolve the situation in the SAR:

The US military presence east of the Euphrates is a manifestation of American interventionism. The United States is constantly violating international law and undermining the very possibility of peace returning to these lands.

Meanwhile, Iran accused the US of trying to start a military confrontation with Iran, to start a war:

At first there were provocations with the detention of our tanker. Now a provocation in Saudi Arabia, and they are trying to connect these attacks with Iran. They only need war.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    20 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      16 September 2019 10: 14
      The US does not want Syria or Iran - they want the whole world.
      1. +8
        16 September 2019 10: 22
        US policy for their economy. The whole world "owes" them ....

        Strength diplomacy ..
        “We will look for ways to maintain mutually acceptable cooperation with rival countries, carried out from a position of strength. To do this, the US Armed Forces should have no equal, rely on the potential of the allies and be used simultaneously with other instruments to ensure the security and prosperity of America. This will allow us to conduct diplomatic work from a position of strength. ”
        http://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2018-07-06/1_1003_tramp.html

        Politics from a position of strength (Positions of strength.)
        Foreign policy doctrine formulated by US Secretary of State Dean Acheson (1893-1971). On February 15, 1950, D. Acheson said: “As we have seen from difficult experience, the only way to do business with the Soviet Union is to demonstrate our strength” (to create situations of strength).
        Obviously, the expression has a predecessor - the “power politics”, known both in English (powers politics) and in German (Machtpolitik). The dictum “Strength above law” (Macht gent vor recht) is considered to be its primary source, as defined by the Prussian Chancellor Otto Bismarck’s domestic policy, his opponent, Maximilian, MP of Prussia, von Schwerin (speech dated January 27, 1863).
        POWER POLITICS-
        a kind of foreign policy in which the achievement of political goals is associated with the use of military pressure and the direct use of means of armed violence from one state against another, weaker militarily.
        https://psychology_pedagogy.academic.ru/13008/%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%9B%D0%98%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90
      2. +2
        16 September 2019 10: 36
        Quote: Valery Valery
        The US does not want Syria or Iran - they want the whole world.

        "For the Anglo-Saxons, the whole world is a chessboard on which only the Anglo-Saxons win."
        1. +1
          16 September 2019 11: 58
          And whom did this chess team win, or at least tactically surpass, lately these chess strategists only fail, but amuse everyone with their empty chatter and threats. Clowns.
          1. 0
            16 September 2019 22: 19
            Quote: yuliatreb
            lately, these chess strategists are just failing,

            Destroyed the USSR, Yugoslavia, Iraq Libya was born ISIS, the War in Syria, the Color Revolution in Egypt, Tunisia. Yemen, Africa in the war - this is not enough. About Georgia, Ukraine will not say anything. Millions of refugees. I will not continue anymore.
        2. 0
          18 September 2019 01: 48
          Sometimes they got this board at the end.
      3. +2
        16 September 2019 10: 49
        Quote: Valery Valery
        The US does not want Syria or Iran - they want the whole world.

        I’ll make a small adjustment, your words, they want only those countries that are rich in minerals, where you can get good money from this.
    2. +2
      16 September 2019 10: 20
      US President began talking about the possibility of "taking military action against Iran"

      As always, "we have strong evidence, but we will not show them to anyone ..." (c). Familiar songs Yes
      1. +1
        16 September 2019 10: 49
        Quote: Terenin
        As always, "we have strong evidence, but we will not show it to anyone ..."

        Well, well, and Powell Colin shook a test tube with evidence (although no one still knows what is in the test tube). But the main thing is that it was shaking, and not what was in it.
    3. +12
      16 September 2019 10: 30
      ... after the attack on oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia

      It’s interesting and funny to me, "what a hell of a lot" the Saudis buy for tens of billions of dollars various "Patriots", F-35 fighters, and some small, penny drone flew in, and blew everything "to a hair dryer" fool
      1. +3
        16 September 2019 10: 40
        Because they are obliged to buy, buy and buy, primarily from the United States, weapons.
      2. +6
        16 September 2019 11: 26
        Quote: Terenin
        "what a hell" the Saudis buy for tens of billions of dollars various "Patriot", F-35 fighters,

        will not buy - there will be problems with democracy smile
        1. +2
          16 September 2019 16: 11
          Quote: Black
          Quote: Terenin
          "what a hell" the Saudis buy for tens of billions of dollars various "Patriot", F-35 fighters,

          will not buy - there will be problems with democracy smile

          Yeah. While the Saudis pay, the Americans do not notice, even such a climax of democracy:
          Saudi Supreme Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz Ali resolved cannibalism in October 2015. Aziz Ali broadcast:
          If a man is deadly hungry and does not find food at home, he can cut off a fragment of his wife’s body and eat it. A woman should treat this decision with devotion and humility, as she is one with her husband.
        2. 0
          16 September 2019 17: 09
          there is rather a computerized, ultramodern feudalism. democracy and does not smell.
    4. +2
      16 September 2019 10: 50
      I would not be surprised if over time it turns out that the attack of "Houthi" drones was led by a simple American guy from somewhere from the Rammstein or Incirlik base ..
      1. +1
        16 September 2019 11: 13
        This is unlikely.
        In fact, this blow is an indicator of the helplessness of the Saudi air defense. Created by USA, Secured by USA, trained by USA.
        1. +2
          16 September 2019 11: 30
          Quote: Spade
          This is unlikely.
          In fact, this blow is an indicator of the helplessness of the Saudi air defense. Created by USA, Secured by USA, trained by USA.

          Well, why is it unlikely ... Saudi Americans will force them to buy their planes and systems (otherwise they will have problems with democracy) ... but they are quite happy to arrange a glove box in the region (like Israel, for example). It's no secret that the Americans want to bend Iran - the main supplier of oil to China and the EU
    5. +3
      16 September 2019 10: 50
      The United States, no one called to Syria, but after all, Turkey, too.
    6. +2
      16 September 2019 11: 16
      according to the US State Department .. where there is oil and gas, it is urgent to bring democracy. on the wings of aviation, and on US aircraft carriers. otherwise these peoples are undemocratic in their use of natural resources!
    7. 0
      16 September 2019 19: 56
      The US military presence east of the Euphrates is a manifestation of American interventionism. The United States is constantly violating international law and undermining the very possibility of peace returning to these lands.

      Zionism will stop at nothing .. Russia has come to BV for good reason, so it’s not yet evening Syria and Iran, the last outpost!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"