NATO announced no US intention to deploy missiles in Eurasia

39
The United States does not intend to deploy ground-based installations with medium- and shorter-range cruise missiles on the territory of Eurasia, since they already have enough sea and air-based missile systems deployed. This was stated by NATO Deputy Secretary General Rose Gottemoeller.

NATO announced no US intention to deploy missiles in Eurasia




Speaking in Oslo on nuclear deterrence, Gottemoeller, in particular, stated that the United States will not deploy ground-based missile systems previously banned by the INF Treaty in Eurasia, since they have a sufficient number of air and sea-based missile systems in this region, as well as stockpiles stored in Europe nuclear tactical weapons.

It can be said, in fact, that medium-range land-based missiles are not really needed by the United States for deterrence in Eurasia, since special bases must be sought for their deployment. Therefore, the United States has already deployed very powerful missile-based sea and air platforms in the region.

- she said.

According to her, the United States has kept tactical nuclear weapons in Europe since the Cold War. aviation the bombs. They are kept under complete "American control" and there is no access to other countries. However, the United States willingly connects "non-nuclear NATO countries" to the implementation of "US nuclear missions in Europe."

Russia should not worry about these reserves, since the United States retains complete control over them, which they do not intend to transfer to any other countries.

Gottemoeller said.

At the end of her speech, she also did not forget to repeat the American "mantra" that only Russia, which constantly violated the agreement, was to blame for the collapse of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate and Shorter-Range Missiles. The United States was always committed to the INF Treaty and withdrew from it only because of Russian violations.
  • https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/index.htm
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 September 2019 19: 46
    Fresh tradition ... lol
    1. +14
      11 September 2019 19: 55
      Only sprats, Sumerians, and Poles can believe the American talking.
      1. +5
        11 September 2019 20: 23
        Quote: Egorovich
        Only sprats, Sumerians, and Poles can believe the American talking.

        Duc said the truth, they pushed their checkpoints wherever they could
        1. +5
          11 September 2019 20: 38
          They will install type air defense installations -MK42 along the perimeter of Russia, and next to it is a warehouse of cruise "fine" missiles, which take off quite well from these installations) You can't believe the striped ones!
          1. -1
            11 September 2019 22: 13
            Read carefully:
            they already have enough deployed sea and air-based missile systems

            Indeed, why should they still, if there is already dofiga. Moreover, increased mobility, which, if necessary, can be very quickly transferred to any part of the world.
            So in this case, NATO can be trusted for the next year, I think. Well, maybe not much in Poland. As a "primary target" for Russian missiles in the event of a global war. So that the other goals survive.
    2. +2
      11 September 2019 20: 05
      Quote: Nycomed
      Fresh tradition ... lol

      Are you here again right here in front of the whole site? .. laughing I think you have little chance with your worldview ..)) wink
      But on the topic ..
      Russia should not worry about these reserves, since the United States retains complete control over them, which they do not intend to transfer to any other countries.

      Does anyone else believe this, except for Nycomed, the cunning, etc. . ?
      I feel the West will go to Va-Bank by genes.
      Jews are also "worried" about Iran .. well
      1. 0
        11 September 2019 20: 10
        And you could not "poke" me? Or education, in another way, does not allow?
    3. +1
      12 September 2019 00: 19
      These will lie - they will take inexpensively.
      Jackals have no faith!
  2. +3
    11 September 2019 19: 48
    The United States does not intend to deploy ground-based installations with medium- and shorter-range cruise missiles on the territory of Eurasia, since they already have enough sea and air-based missile systems deployed. This was stated by NATO Deputy Secretary General Rose Gottemoeller.

    And then some time passes and another representative of NATO pretends that no one promised to deploy missiles. This is almost the same as with the entry of NATO air forces
  3. +2
    11 September 2019 19: 53
    Well, yes, NATO promised a lot of things, in words -and not expand at the expense of the former socialist countries, and the republics of the former USSR. And nn closer to our borders. Believing them is dangerous for the future of Russia.
    1. +3
      11 September 2019 20: 10
      Quote: Thrifty
      Believing them is dangerous for the future of Russia.

      To them in the West Russia is like a bone in the throat, for a thousand years of our existence, as a state, as a nation, etc.
      While we are resisting and reborn to evil to thieves and other demons within the country. soldier
    2. +1
      11 September 2019 21: 28
      Quote: Thrifty
      . Believing them is dangerous for the future of Russia.

      Believe them NOT! Not now, not tomorrow, not when ..
  4. +4
    11 September 2019 20: 01
    Russia should not worry about these reserves, since the United States retains complete control over them, which they do not intend to transfer to any other countries.

    I’m soothed so much soothed !!!
  5. +2
    11 September 2019 20: 11
    Worthless words to her!
  6. +2
    11 September 2019 20: 12
    Russia should not worry about these reserves, since the United States retains complete control over them, which they do not intend to transfer to any other countries.

    Gottemoeller said.


    All. Calmed down. Relaxed. Go to sleep.
    Good grandmother. She told a bedtime story.
  7. +3
    11 September 2019 20: 14
    Lord But where are they finding such terrible women ?!
    1. +2
      11 September 2019 20: 33
      They burned all the beautiful ones for heresy.
    2. 0
      11 September 2019 20: 54
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Lord But where are they finding such terrible women ?!

      She looks like a man. Transgender ...
    3. 0
      11 September 2019 21: 15
      Are ugly ministers easier to start a war?
  8. 0
    11 September 2019 20: 14
    Worthless words to her!
  9. 0
    11 September 2019 20: 19
    The deputy secretary general of NATO (whose responsibility includes the subcontinent Europe and the continent of North America) clearly went to the roof - where is NATO and where is the subcontinent of Asia.

    And what does the international middle-class official have to do with the US president, who has already voiced his decision to limit the non-deployment zone of American ground-based RSDs to Europe only?
  10. 0
    11 September 2019 20: 21
    Just look at her biography, even on Wikipedia.
  11. 0
    11 September 2019 20: 29
    How did Stanislavsky like to say? Could actors better find.
  12. -9
    11 September 2019 20: 32
    Quote: Kontrik
    Quote: Thrifty
    Believing them is dangerous for the future of Russia.

    To them in the West Russia is like a bone in the throat, for a thousand years of our existence, as a state, as a nation, etc.
    While we are resisting and reborn to evil to thieves and other demons within the country. soldier

    it’s not been here for thousands of years, and so propaganda works well - if citizens don’t believe that there are only bloodthirsty ghouls around, they begin to ask the authorities uncomfortable questions. The mythical enemy is better.
    1. +3
      11 September 2019 20: 56
      Quote: Nadir Shah
      Quote: Kontrik
      Quote: Thrifty
      Believing them is dangerous for the future of Russia.

      To them in the West Russia is like a bone in the throat, for a thousand years of our existence, as a state, as a nation, etc.
      While we are resisting and reborn to evil to thieves and other demons within the country. soldier

      it’s not been here for thousands of years, and so propaganda works well - if citizens don’t believe that there are only bloodthirsty ghouls around, they begin to ask the authorities uncomfortable questions. The mythical enemy is better.

      Well yes. Russia "moved" to the borders of NATO ...
  13. +2
    11 September 2019 20: 32
    We have already talked about the non-expansion of the American national terrorist organization to the east, and this bump on the outskirts of Russia has already climbed up, to trust them not to respect themselves.
  14. +2
    11 September 2019 20: 47
    A goat got into the garden to walk, as if he could not break his horns ...
  15. -1
    11 September 2019 21: 06
    Aunt Rosa has a double surname - Gotte and Muller. This is evidence of adherence to the double standards of American foreign policy. And now the United States is satisfied with the maritime and air component in ensuring the security of NATO countries without claims to the Eurasian land. This is the right decision: there is not enough land now, even for fruit and vegetable bases, not like cruise missiles. And what is important, the trend leads to an increase in the share of peaceful areas in comparison with similar sites for the deployment of INF systems.
    The problem is different: is Russia to blame for such a shift of emphasis in ensuring defense capability, or are the laws of business and economic European integration naturally leading to such a state of affairs when rockets become inappropriate not only on the surface, but also on the water and even in the air?
    In this regard, withdrawal from the Agreement may be premature, because In the short term, Russia plans to switch to wingless missiles with doubled rocket thrust with an internal stabilizer and an electronic navigation circuit hidden for detection by conventional means.
    This turn of events may again lead to a dead end for American engineers and electronics experts in rocket instrumentation.
    1. +1
      11 September 2019 21: 22
      Do you understand what you wrote?
      1. +1
        16 September 2019 19: 48
        What is there to understand: who benefits from listening to an American grandmother in Oslo about the US presence in Europe? Russia or Europe. Eslmi Europe is beneficial, then to whom exactly? Judging by the emphasis on Oslo, probably the Norwegians. Norway, the only NATO country that bordered on the USSR. Where is that USSR now? He is not here. What is there? Russia. If you listen to Rose Gottemoeller, then Russia is destined for the fate of the USSR. That's what I understand in what I wrote. Is it now understandable?
        1. 0
          16 September 2019 20: 40
          Without doubling the internal traction and the electronic navigation scheme is more understandable. They have long wanted to eat Russia.
  16. +4
    11 September 2019 21: 17
    I want to look at the person who believes these promises
  17. 0
    11 September 2019 21: 32
    Yes, of course, we won’t; they promise with one hand, shit with the other, we’ll see which one will fill up faster.
  18. +1
    11 September 2019 21: 51
    Believe them, do not respect yourself ...
  19. 0
    11 September 2019 22: 30
    The Hohs, too, believed that they would be taken to NATO.
  20. +1
    11 September 2019 22: 36
    They believe themselves do not respect
  21. +1
    12 September 2019 05: 01
    The United States does not intend to deploy ground-based installations with medium- and shorter-range cruise missiles on the territory of Eurasia, since they already have enough sea and air-based missile systems deployed. This was stated by NATO Deputy Secretary General Rose Gottemoeller.

    S-who will believe this nonsense ?! wassat ... naive, I can’t laughing
  22. 0
    12 September 2019 07: 22
    that the US will not place in Eurasia ground installations of missiles previously banned by the INF Treaty, since they have in this region a sufficient number of air and sea-based missile systems, as well as stockpiles of nuclear tactical weapons stored in Europe.
    No options, don't lie, "Always tell the truth." feel
    The USA has already tested the PU missile defense system; they are quite suitable for launching the INF. And they have long been installed in Eastern Europe. am angry
  23. 0
    12 September 2019 13: 11
    There are no intentions, but they will post
    Otherwise, why should they withdraw from the agreements?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"