Optimization of the army in Chinese. PLA reform results

41
Since 2016, China has carried out a massive restructuring of its armed forces. According to the plans of the command, the People’s Liberation Army had to change its organizational structure in accordance with the requirements of the time. In just a few years, the tasks set were completed and the reform was completed. Now the PLA is smaller in terms of numbers, but its combat potential was to increase.





Background and preparation


The need for transformations in the PLA has been discussed for several years, and on 1 on January 2016, the country's leadership launched a new reform. According to plans of that time, all work should have been completed by 2020. It should be noted that 2020 occupies a special place in Beijing's plans, including in the military sphere.

The reason for the reform was a long-standing criticism of the existing PLA structure. In its architecture, the army met the requirements of past decades, but did not meet current views on defense. In addition, there were corruption and other negative phenomena. All this led to the need for reform.

The preparation of the reform took several years. During this time, more than 850 forums and conferences were held on the current and desired appearance of the PLA, a survey of the personnel of 700 military units was conducted, and the opinion of more than 900 commanders at different levels was taken into account.

It is known about the analysis and application of foreign experience. The military and political leadership of China took into account the latest transformations in the armed forces of the United States and Russia. Using all the data obtained, the military leaders were able to determine the development of the army and draw up a clear program of action.


The military-administrative division of China after the reform


The first goal of the reform was to change the organizational structure of the armed forces in order to eliminate bureaucratic and corruption problems, as well as to expedite the work and more easily solve the tasks. It was also planned to reduce the number of personnel to acceptable values, allowing to maintain combat efficiency and have the necessary reserves. In parallel, it was necessary to carry out re-equipment with modern models of all classes.

Administrative transformations


On 11 on January 2016, an order was signed to transform the higher command structures. The General Staff, the Main Political Directorate, the Main Logistics Directorate and the Main Arms Directorate have transformed into 15 new smaller organizations with their goals and objectives. Some of these departments were previously part of the larger, while some appeared for the first time.

Under the Central Military Council, several new structures appeared. These are the Committee on Science and Technology, the Office of Strategic Planning, Reforms and International Military Cooperation. The tasks of monitoring the progress of the work are assigned to the Audit Office of the CVC.

In 2017, the restructuring of military administrative units began. Prior to that, the army was part of the seven military districts. Now, instead of them, there are five combined commands, divided by geographical feature. The boundaries of the zones of responsibility of such OKs partially coincide with the division of the old districts.

Army changes


Along with the transformation of the districts into the PLA, there was a restructuring of the main formations. Until 2017, ground forces included 20 armies - from 3 to 5 in each military district. After the reform, their number was reduced to 13, the armies subordinated to OK were also rebuilt.



For example, earlier in the Shenyang Military District there were 16th, 26th, 39th and 40th combined arms armies, including infantry, tank and other compounds. As part of the reform, the Northern Joint Command was created on the basis of the district, to which the 78th, 79th and 80th armies are subordinate. These associations were created by transforming and re-equipping the four existing armies.

Each new army includes six combined-arms brigades with infantry, tank and other units. The army also has six support brigades, artillery, air defense, army brigades aviation etc. Northern OK directly controls 11 border brigades and 4 coastal defense brigades.

The main striking means of the armies of the new look are combined arms brigades. They include two tank battalions of 40 vehicles in each and two motorized infantry battalions on an 31 armored vehicle each. The artillery division of the brigade includes 36 guns; the air defense division is equipped with 18 anti-aircraft defense systems.

Conversion to strategic nuclear forces


Against the background of general army reforms, the renaming of the land component of strategic nuclear forces took place. Until the end of 2015, the 2th artillery corps of the PLA was responsible for the operation of ground-based missile systems. On 1 of January 2016, the corps was reorganized into the missile forces of the People's Liberation Army.



According to foreign data, the reorganization of the 2 artillery corps into missile forces did not lead to any major changes in the organizational structure. In fact, it is only a change of name. The land component of the strategic nuclear forces in terms of numbers and capabilities has long exceeded the army corps, and now it has been renamed into troops.

Strategic Support Forces


Since 2016, a completely new structure has been operating in the PLA - strategic support forces. This type of armed forces is responsible for the implementation and application of the most advanced rocket-space and radio-electronic technologies. Using spacecraft and electronics, the MTR should conduct reconnaissance, carry out operations in cyberspace and counteract the enemy’s electronic weapons.

According to known data, MTR includes the management of space systems and the management of network systems. The first structure is responsible for the operation of military spaceports and various equipment, both in orbit and on the ground. The second works in the field of cyber war and electronics in general. For obvious reasons, the strategic support forces attract special attention of foreign intelligence, but the main aspects of their activities remain a mystery.

Reform Results


At the beginning of this year, the PLA command published interesting data on the results of the conversion of the ground forces and the armed forces as a whole. As part of the reform, more than half of the non-combat units fell under reduction. All this affected the personnel. So, the number of officers in the service decreased by 30%.



An interesting result of the reform was a change in the proportions of personnel in different branches of the armed forces. First time in stories PLA, the number of ground forces dropped below 50% of the total number of troops in the armed forces. However, the exact numbers at that time were not called. It is also regularly reported that the combat effectiveness of the army is growing according to the results of the transformations.

From the available data, it follows that the positive results of the current reform are based on several key factors. First of all, it is the optimization of management structures with the division of responsibilities between different organizations. A noticeable economic effect could give a reduction in the number of units and personnel. In parallel with the reform of the army, new types of weapons and equipment with improved characteristics were produced, which could enhance the effect of organizational transformations.

An important step is the creation of strategic support forces uniting a number of previously existing structures. Combining them into a single MTR simplifies the conduct of necessary operations and interaction with other types of armed forces and combat arms. The transformation of the 2 artillery corps into missile forces has no serious consequences, because the development of this structure is primarily associated with new technologies and developments.

It is known that when developing the reform plan, foreign experience was taken into account, including transformations in the Russian army in previous years. Apparently, it was Russia that became the source of basic ideas and solutions. As a result, the new combined-arms armies and their brigades in their structure to a certain extent resemble associations of the “new look” from the Russian army.

It is alleged that according to the results of the 2016-19 reform. The People’s Liberation Army of China has become a little smaller, but stronger and more effective. Carrying out such transformations, with positive consequences, fully fits into Beijing’s current strategy. China wants to gain a foothold in the position of regional leader, and then become a world power. The solution of such problems requires a powerful developed army, which requires reforms and transformations.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 September 2019 06: 36
    They include two tank battalions of 40 vehicles each and two motorized infantry battalions with 31 armored vehicles each.

    Not exactly the other way around? Some scanty motorized rifle battalions then go out, but the battalion commander does not have a tank tank.
    36 guns in the brigade - is it exclusively a barrel artillery with the removal of a rzso in separate formations, or how are we 18 + 18 barrel / reactive?
    And of course it’s interesting - even after the reduction of about 80 Olga’s combined arms brigades
    1. +10
      12 September 2019 06: 53
      There are 13 tanks in the companies. The battalion commander has the 40th. The structure, as in the tank battalions of our motorized rifle brigades.
    2. -4
      12 September 2019 07: 17
      Don’t go to a fortuneteller, Chinese generals persuade the CPC Central Committee to check the power in action, among other things, given that the Chinese have a very powerful planning horizon, I won’t be surprised if the operation is being prepared now, but will be carried out in the 30s. Effective managers are not there.
      1. -1
        12 September 2019 10: 02
        .
        Quote: Civil
        Effective managers are not there.

        Yes, even how.
        They are only called differently, communist
      2. +6
        12 September 2019 11: 14
        The funny thing is that the model of the PLA reform was the reform of Serdyukov. Reducing officers by 30 percent and the number of units and districts, plus the formation of joint commands on a territorial basis. Doesn’t resemble anything? wink
        1. 0
          5 December 2019 10: 46
          And what has changed after Serdyukov’s departure?
      3. 0
        13 September 2019 12: 12
        on whom do they want to practice?)))))
        1. 0
          14 September 2019 02: 15
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          on whom do they want to practice?)))))

          already trained when they wanted to shove into the non-shoved and disperse the non-accelerated ...
  2. +1
    12 September 2019 07: 11
    In short, they are on the brigade system, and again we are divisional? laughing The brigades will be weak in a combined arms battle. And what did they do with the "territories"? The article deals with the regular troops ...
    I remember that they had many times more territorials. Such, so to speak, the people's militia ...
    1. +2
      12 September 2019 09: 37
      are they on the brigade system, and again are we divisional?

      We are not always divisional, but why the Chinese have switched to brigades is incomprehensible. Maybe they slipped our disu them? I remember during the 5 exercises in Transbaikalia our brigades against a conditional enemy were able to hold out for a week, after which they were surrounded. Conclusion: we can’t cope with brigades against our neighbor.
      Although, on the other hand, the Chinese could have felt that it was excessive to hold divisions against us.
      And what did they do with the "territories"? The article deals with the regular troops ...

      Infantry was reduced in the troops, and left in the territories.
    2. 0
      12 September 2019 11: 03
      The transition to brigades in Russia was absolutely correct.
      The number of headquarters (neither divisions, nor regiments) has decreased, with an absurd number of generals and colonels. Teams are more mobile and manageable.
      1. +2
        13 September 2019 15: 55
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Teams are more mobile and manageable.

        it if there is no large-scale war-it needs full-blooded divisions ....
        1. 0
          13 September 2019 18: 36
          For the large-scale past war. The wars of the regular armies have also changed.
          The rear is shot and bombed. Structures due to be flexible and
          mobile.
          1. 0
            24 September 2019 13: 49
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The rear fire and bomb

            The tank division used to have its own ZR regiment - you won’t especially bomb it - this is not possible in the brigade 8 ... request
      2. 0
        15 September 2019 22: 28
        The transition to brigades in Russia was absolutely correct.

        The teachings showed that it is impossible to say unequivocally.
        The number of headquarters (neither divisions, nor regiments) has decreased, with an absurd number of generals and colonels.

        The number of staffs remained the same, but the number of officers really decreased. But not the fact that it benefited.
    3. 0
      14 September 2019 02: 21
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      In short, they are on the brigade system, and again we are divisional? laughing Weak brigades will be in combined arms combat.

      and they don’t even need to seize the bridgehead, defend the bridgehead and wait for the main troops (divisions) to approach ...
  3. -5
    12 September 2019 07: 23
    -And how does China contain such a lot of "parasites" ??? -This is how much food, gasoline and fuels and lubricants, uniforms, living quarters are needed; in order to provide all this with such a mass of people ... who practically do not produce anything and do not do ... - Tomorrow they will attack and take away, take everything for nothing (even from the same Russia); but today they still live "at their own expense" ...
    -What do they have ...- in every military unit there are household plots where vegetables, cereals are grown, livestock is kept ??? -Otherwise, where to get it all ???
    1. +14
      12 September 2019 07: 51
      The second economy of the world - can afford. In addition, the army means salaries and purchases within the country; money does not leave the economy and is not a dead weight.
    2. -5
      12 September 2019 10: 04
      It is believed that the figures voiced by the CCP are traditional lies for comrades.
      1. +2
        12 September 2019 14: 56
        Not a lie, but a military trick. You might think gentlemen always tell everyone the truth ...
    3. +6
      12 September 2019 12: 01
      The question is correct, but there are also nuances smile
      A million army against the background of one and a half billion people is not particularly irrelevant - an analogue - if Russia had an army somewhere between 140 and 200.
      The maintenance of the army is not only a waste, but also the possibility of developing economics. Factories, scientific institutes, agriculture, investments in infrastructure, social services, solvent demand, etc. Examples ... see how many small settlements survived when military units were closed. Or more towns when defense enterprises were closed.
      So, to maintain an army is, of course, expensive, but not to contain even worse ... because the rest will not be ...
      1. -4
        12 September 2019 12: 23
        - Alas, but this is not so ... - China also has a "different army" ... - This is about a billion hungry and beggars who live in rural remote areas; without electricity and water supply; no central heating; without pensions and benefits; not having any social and medical services ...
        -And ... it used to be from this "impoverished environment" recruited the army of China (PLA), and now they are recruiting the PLA from the townspeople and with a secondary education .. -And even those who have tattoos on their bodies are not taken to military officer schools and who snores in a dream ... is such a selection ...
        -So the army of China is very expensive ...
        1. +3
          12 September 2019 12: 31
          So the army is very expensive for China ...

          The same can be said about India, for example. And about any country in the world. But armies are not being liquidated anywhere, on the contrary, they are affordable.
          1. 0
            12 September 2019 13: 01
            -No, in India everything is completely different ...
            -India has not been able to get rid of its pagan patriarchal (rajah, maharajah, clan caste classes, etc.) ...- although it has modern weapons ... -India can fight the same "panopticon state" ( Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, etc.) ...
            -The army of India - even next to the PLA "is not worth" ...
            1. +2
              12 September 2019 13: 17
              I mean that the Indian army is more expensive than the Chinese. Still, they have full-fledged nuclear weapons, a fleet, etc. Plus, there’s no but combat experience. But their poverty is greater than that of China. The economy is also thinner. So, relatively, the maintenance of the army is more expensive. And the fact that the PLA is a cut above, no one disputes.
    4. 0
      13 September 2019 12: 53
      Quote: gorenina91
      -And how does China contain such a lot of "parasites" ???


      To serve in the Chinese army is an honor.
      There is a competition for contract service - not everyone will be taken.
      It's hard to even imagine how much China is investing in popularizing the army - for example, an army and navy museum not far from Shanghai in the form of an aircraft carrier - inside there are models of military equipment, a historical exposition and modern weapons, on the "deck" of aviation - cool!




  4. 0
    12 September 2019 07: 48
    And about corruption in the Chinese army can be more detailed?
    1. +6
      12 September 2019 09: 42
      And about corruption in the Chinese army can be more detailed?

      Those who could tell have probably already been shot wassat
      1. -3
        12 September 2019 10: 05
        That's right, communist.
        Steal, but no one should know except their own.
        1. +1
          12 September 2019 14: 58
          Rather, American. When corruption is called the economy.
  5. 0
    12 September 2019 09: 41
    There was information that the Chinese in the combined arms armies now have the same states as ours.
    With two exceptions:
    1. The armies have the same number of tank and combined arms brigades. We recall in the combined arms army more motorized rifle, and in the tank more tank brigades.
    2. There are no missile brigades in armies. We have an Iskander brigade in each army.
  6. Naz
    +2
    12 September 2019 09: 54
    The Chinese are well done. Already do their weapons. Maybe for now copies, but I think it will soon be clean. That is what the Communist Party can do with a normal approach.
    1. +1
      12 September 2019 12: 38
      Quote: Naz
      The Chinese are well done. Already do their weapons. Maybe for now copies, but I think it will soon be clean. That is what the Communist Party can do with a normal approach.

      Have you fallen from the moon? Nikita Khrushchev built a powerful military industry for China, though later he quarreled with Mao and the USSR had a terrible headache. Look at the series of books "Red Dragon" https://flot.com/publications/books/shelf/reddragon/
      https://www.abirus.ru/user/files/Military/RedDragon/RedDragon.pdf
      https://www.litmir.me/bd/?b=211400
      https://military.wikireading.ru/54536
      https://warspot.ru/3162-deti-krasnogo-drakona
      https://www.litmir.me/bd/?b=565547
  7. +4
    12 September 2019 10: 58
    "combined arms brigades. They include two tank battalions of 40 vehicles each and two motorized infantry battalions on 31 armored vehicles each. The brigade's artillery battalion includes 36 guns" ////
    -----
    Great structure.
    Instead of bulky divisions - brigades saturated with tanks and artillery. There are no extra structures — regiments.
    1. +2
      12 September 2019 12: 18
      In fact, the Wehrmacht tank battalion arr. 43 years old, reinforced by motorized infantry and artillery. Able to solve most of the tasks for a "classic" motorized rifle division.
    2. 0
      15 September 2019 22: 30
      Great structure.
      Instead of bulky divisions - brigades saturated with tanks and artillery.

      There are no rear structures. And without them, more than a week to hold out is problematic.
  8. +1
    12 September 2019 13: 19
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    And what did they do with the "territories"? The article deals with the regular troops ...
    I remember that they had many times more territorials. Such, so to speak, the people's militia ...

    China has divided into army and territorial militia
    the first is equipped perfectly and highly mobile, the second is almost not mobile and is capable of only static passive object defense.
    In addition, approximately 340 thousand expeditionary forces are allocated in the PLA.
    These are forces that are equipped for operations and landing outside the country.
    In general, China creates very mobile forces and creates a network of bases to defend its borders and influence areas of investment.
  9. 0
    12 September 2019 13: 38
    It seems that the sharpening is going on against the amers and allies .. The sea and air component is being strengthened, the ground forces are also aimed mainly at mobility .. Just for Bodalov in the southern seas .. They would aim at us - they would not disperse divisions ..
  10. +1
    12 September 2019 14: 04
    The Chinese comrades are working.
    Only now it is necessary to check-run all of your concepts and samples. And not Tibetans high-mountainous. In the same Syria, we can cut into areas for cleaning, there are just the most violent Uyghurs there. In Afghanistan - we need to get ready to control, it seems that the Americans will do their feet at the first opportunity.
    And then the division-brigade back and forth, this and we have been marking time for more than 20 years. As the guarantor Yeltsin used to say: "You make me as cheaper as possible, and do not tell what you are missing!"
    One must seriously prepare for war, because it always comes suddenly, the enemy is always strong and treacherous, and very often underestimated.
  11. +1
    12 September 2019 15: 02
    The army also has six support brigades, artillery brigades, air defense, army aviation etc.
    . What can I say, great.
  12. -1
    27 September 2019 19: 49
    Well, at least you can more or less accurately predict that we still have 2-3 years in reserve. Of course, this will not increase our combat readiness, but for this our elite has a backlash in time, they will be able to earn even more overwork and it will be even better to provide for their old age and the future of children. How can one not be glad for people smile