The Ministry of Defense denied the information about the emergency landing of the MiG-31BM

55
The Ministry of Defense denied the information about the emergency landing of the MiG-31BM fighter-interceptor at the Bolshoye Savino airfield during a complex exercise. This was reported by the press service of the Central Military District.

The Ministry of Defense denied the information about the emergency landing of the MiG-31BM




The Russian military department said that the information circulated by some media about the alleged emergency landing of the MiG-31BM fighter due to a fire occurred was not true. The plane crashed in normal mode, the detected malfunction was identified during the mandatory post-flight inspection of the aircraft and has already been fixed.

On September 10 on 2019 of the year, the MiG-31БМ aircraft, after carrying out a planned training flight, made a regular landing at the airfield in Perm. When conducting a mandatory after-flight inspection, a malfunction was detected, which is currently resolved

- it is spoken in the message of the Ministry of Defense.

It is added that at the present time both the aircraft itself and the crew are ready to carry out further tasks for their intended purpose.

Earlier, some media reported that on September 10 during the exercises on the integrated combat use of the supersonic MiG-31BM fighters and Su-34 fighter-bomber, the MiG-31BM fighter made an emergency landing on the Bolshoye Savino airfield in the Perm Territory. The cause was called a fire on board the aircraft.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    55 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +6
      11 September 2019 13: 22
      information circulated by some media about the alleged emergency landing of the MiG-31BM fighter due to a fire,
      Question: Do we need such publicity?
      1. +6
        11 September 2019 13: 30
        And everything is simple. Responsibility for publishing unverified news. Financial liability of the owner of the media that issued the untrusted news.
      2. +7
        11 September 2019 13: 33
        It would be necessary to call these "some media" then their messages will have the appropriate trust
      3. +5
        11 September 2019 13: 38
        I need it. Otherwise, they begin to think about what happened or did not happen is overgrown with rumors, comes to insanity in stories from the "first" mouth. Moreover, no one is going to share serious secrets.
      4. -2
        11 September 2019 14: 09
        Answer: not needed!
      5. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      11 September 2019 13: 47
      And everything is simple. Responsibility for publishing unverified news

      Right And after the third fine for a year, revoke the license for six months
      1. 0
        11 September 2019 15: 23
        Quote: KelWin
        And everything is simple. Responsibility for publishing unverified news

        Right And after the third fine for a year, revoke the license for six months

        And what they will eat, they are children. feel It seems to me that all these media have long been foreign grant-eaters.
    3. 0
      11 September 2019 13: 58
      the detected malfunction was identified during the mandatory post-flight inspection of the aircraft and has already been fixed.

      That's right, there will be fewer problems.
    4. -1
      11 September 2019 14: 11
      When conducting a mandatory after-flight inspection, a malfunction was detected, which is currently resolved

      after-flight preparation is to put the plane into the parking lot faster and get out of the airfield ... to find horseradish there
      1. +2
        11 September 2019 14: 33
        Quote: novel xnumx
        after-flight preparation is to put the plane into the parking lot faster and get out of the airfield ... to find horseradish there

        If a malfunction is found in flight and is recorded in the log, then you will dump the horseradish until you fix it + prompt refueling. It's good when a small plane (attack aircraft, fighter), and here, I remember how they will give out - "operational refueling of 87 tons", so sit, wait for these TZ.
        1. +3
          11 September 2019 14: 52
          Well. this is the case of the SDKs, and the gunsmith can also blame .. hi
          1. -3
            11 September 2019 15: 45
            Quote: novel xnumx
            and the gunsmith can and topple ..

            Yeah, I think only if the fuck from the army, that is, completely, with giblets! those who try to blame as soon as possible - are not needed in the videoconferencing
            1. +3
              11 September 2019 15: 59
              no spray needed !! each has its own carrot
            2. +4
              11 September 2019 18: 28
              Quote: Igor Aviator
              Quote: novel xnumx
              and the gunsmith can and topple ..

              Yeah, I think only if the fuck from the army, that is, completely, with giblets! those who try to blame as soon as possible - are not needed in the videoconferencing

              Igor, this is a slang of professionals, do not take everything to heart, especially without proper education, even if you saw off and met planes behind the fence. wink
          2. -1
            11 September 2019 15: 49
            Well, this is a completely different conversation !!!
      2. +1
        11 September 2019 14: 53
        to quickly roll the plane into the parking lot and get off the airfield ...

        Roman, in vain you are so ironic, the boys before they run home (they have specialists for this) carefully check and inspect the equipment, whether it is -40 frost or +40 heat.
        1. +3
          11 September 2019 16: 00
          Sergey, well, the right word, I’m from there myself
          1. +1
            11 September 2019 16: 06
            Well, I, as if involved in them, too, and therefore I am writing to you, as is allotment.
            1. +3
              11 September 2019 16: 09
              in fact, the most important thing was to grab a tractor for yourself to push it into the parking lot, and there, depending on the flight mission, either remove the rocket - (this takes a long time) or unscrew the rocket launchers - this is fast ... then seal the plane, hand over the guard and faster to drape all the rest later
              1. +1
                11 September 2019 16: 16
                Roman, it’s not the pilots who are doing this, but the working personnel (mechanics). Maybe it was considered normal for you, and here, until everyone checks and reports anywhere from there and you don’t steer, and there wasn’t anyone I did it.
                1. +3
                  11 September 2019 16: 25
                  and I don’t speak for the pilots, they dumped faster than anyone, but, as a rule, the entire schedule was on the next day, flights were 10-12 hours, and at the end there was nothing left to do
                  1. 0
                    11 September 2019 16: 27
                    And you, that there was no calculated duty staff for this.
                    1. +3
                      11 September 2019 16: 28
                      no, the system is crewed, and besides you, there was nothing to the plane ... although, I probably shouldn't compare - I served on "Kamakhs"
                      1. +1
                        11 September 2019 16: 33
                        It’s simpler to say where you served, there was a complete FIT in relation to the service.
                        1. +3
                          11 September 2019 16: 36
                          Far East ... somewhere you are right, but !!! We didn’t have any flight accidents due to equipment, and our squadron raised 10 out of 12 for exercises - but they could have done it, there was no order, I don’t know how to judge here ..
                      2. +1
                        11 September 2019 16: 36
                        Our commander would come to you, in a week, everyone would follow the strings and each would fulfill his immediate duties.
                        1. +3
                          11 September 2019 16: 37
                          Yes, he would have drunk a fuck, they saw all ...
                        2. 0
                          11 September 2019 16: 39
                          So I, about the Far East and say. But without it drinks also impossible.
                        3. +2
                          11 September 2019 16: 42
                          and identity too !! drinks where without it
                        4. 0
                          11 September 2019 16: 46
                          Novel, over the past years, the Air Force doesn’t care, there is more order than it was 10-15 years ago.
                        5. +2
                          11 September 2019 16: 58
                          28 years ago ... The Union was still ..
                        6. 0
                          11 September 2019 17: 08
                          You served back in Soviet times, and I wrote to you about our time.
      3. -1
        11 September 2019 15: 41
        Quote: novel xnumx
        after-flight preparation is to put the plane into the parking lot faster and get out of the airfield ... to find horseradish there

        Don't lie, dear! Refueling with fuel and gases, at least, do not forget about the battery; And if there is a malfunction? Even the gunmen had a job - to remove the cassettes from the LTC, to perform work on the cannon (if firing was carried out), not to mention the "shooting" in case of use, if it is not included in the main option ...
        It all depends on how the IAS service is delivered.
        1. +3
          11 September 2019 16: 01
          the guns clean and discharge the prapora - arrows, this is their carrot
      4. 0
        11 September 2019 15: 44
        Why do you write this nonsense, in your opinion, it may be so, but no one has yet canceled the regulations; both pre-flight preparation and mandatory inspection after the flight are carried out.
        1. +2
          11 September 2019 16: 02
          regulations ... NIAS-78 ..... life is harsher !!
      5. +4
        11 September 2019 17: 23
        Technique blades have always been checked for after-flight.
        And so be you even three times an armourer, until the engineer gives the go-ahead - what the hell are you going to dump after the flights.
        1. +1
          11 September 2019 17: 25
          funny ... engineer .. blades - we have NK - 12 there to reach the blades ...
          1. +3
            11 September 2019 17: 26
            Here is an article about ed.01
            1. +2
              11 September 2019 17: 27
              I'm in the know .. so, something was lost
        2. +1
          11 September 2019 17: 26
          and once again - it’s a startup and engine business all this
        3. +1
          11 September 2019 17: 27
          and who would ask him, an engineer ...
          1. +4
            11 September 2019 17: 34
            Quote: novel xnumx
            and who would ask him, an engineer ...

            Roman, are you in Makhno’s father’s aviation?
            "Regulations are not regulations for you. An engineer - whoever asked him at all ..."
            The engineer is the most important in the parking lot, the commander does not command without his permission in the zone.
            1. +1
              11 September 2019 18: 11
              the main task of the engineer is to get alcohol in the fuel and lubricants correctly, and in the parking lot and without it we will figure it out
              1. +4
                11 September 2019 18: 15
                Um ...
                How many times have you received the rank of lieutenant?
                1. +3
                  11 September 2019 18: 21
                  one ... and one senior .. but understand - there are more people than people in the parking lot of Tu-95 aircraft, and the engineer is really not able to be everywhere, the heads of the TEC detachments still have some influence, but the start and bortach
                  1. +5
                    11 September 2019 19: 17
                    I see, Roman, I see.
                    So they would say that on Tu-95 after-flight we did so ...
                    And here we are Interceptor Mig, you know, 31 are discussing. Hence the discrepancies in the estimates.
                    And then I write that the technician climbs into the air intake on the topic of the article, and you answer that you are not climbing, because the NK-12, you know ...
                    Where is the MiG-31 and where is the NK-12.
                    hi
                    1. +2
                      11 September 2019 19: 49
                      Yes, spit, I remembered it .. inspired ... hi
      6. The comment was deleted.
    5. -4
      11 September 2019 14: 18
      But they (MiG-31) in Bolshoye Savino land for landing right above the center of Perm.
      1. 0
        11 September 2019 15: 56
        Well, and so what, at many airports and at many airfields, airplanes approach the glide path directly above the city and this does not mean anything !!! I remember a passenger Boeing crashed in Perm, and for the MiG-31 to crash there, this has never happened before !!!
        1. -2
          11 September 2019 16: 02
          "On September 6, 2011, in the area of ​​the Bolshoye Savino airfield (Perm Territory), a few minutes after takeoff, the MiG-31 crashed [74]. Crew members: ship commander - 1st class pilot Lieutenant Colonel S. Yu. Stolpyansky and 1st class navigator Major A.V. Gorbachev were killed"

          "On May 18, 2018, the MiG-31 caught fire 300 meters after the start of the take-off at the Bolshoye Savino airport. Both pilots escaped"
          Something like this ... sad
          1. 0
            11 September 2019 16: 12
            The military airfield "Falcon" in the immediate vicinity of the airport "Bolshoye Savino" has been located for more than 40 years, and what do you want to say that your statistics exceed the permissible standards, especially since in the second case you indicated nothing serious happened and there was no danger was not, the plane has already been repaired and continues to fly, you better raise the general statistics, and not only on the "Falcon" and you will see that this is a completely safe, accident-free airfield, and the MiG-31BM is a very reliable and safe aircraft.
            1. 0
              11 September 2019 16: 21
              "then this has never happened !!!"
              Sorry, but, these are your words. hi
              1. -2
                11 September 2019 16: 26
                These are not my words, but statistics, passenger planes crash much more often, only those who do not fly at all never fall, the picture is no better abroad, again, you better use statistics, not your own opinion.
                1. -1
                  11 September 2019 17: 55
                  So I use the statistics on the accident rate of the MiG-31 in the "Bolshoy Savino", and you, it is your own opinion: "and that the MiG-31 crashed there, then this has never happened !!!"

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"