Military Review

Ministry of Defense announced deadlines for state testing of the complex "Response"

35
State tests of the promising anti-submarine missile complex "Response" will end next year. This was stated by Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Alexei Krivoruchko.


Ministry of Defense announced deadlines for state testing of the complex "Response"


The deputy minister of defense as part of the commission of the Ministry of Defense visited the defense enterprises of Concern MPO-Gidropribor JSC. According to the results of the visit, Krivoruchko said that the promising missile complex Response, designed to destroy submarines, was put into pilot production and its state tests are planned complete in 2020 year.

Hydropropribor this year began the pilot production of the promising anti-submarine complex “Response”. It is planned to complete state tests of this complex next year.

- he explained.

Answering the corresponding question, Krivoruchko said that the anti-submarine complex “Response” would be used by both new and modern surface ships under construction. The complex is designed for installation on ships of the class frigate, corvette, cruiser. It is already known for certain that the nuclear-powered cruiser Admiral Nakhimov undergoing modernization at Sevmash will be armed with the “Answer”.

The complex is designed to destroy the submarines of a potential enemy. The warhead after separation from the missile falls into the area of ​​the likely location of the submarine and automatically finds and strikes it

- said the deputy minister.

It was previously reported that the Navy was preparing to adopt a new guided missile designed to destroy submarines.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sky strike fighter
    Sky strike fighter 11 September 2019 11: 01
    +1
    "Answer" is a new anti-submarine missile system, not in any way related to anti-submarine missiles from the Caliber missile family?
  2. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 11 September 2019 11: 10
    +1
    Concern JSC MPO - Hydraulic tool"


    "Hydraulic appliance"this year has started pilot production


    So "Gidropribor" or "Gidpropribor"?
    I do not quibble, but in the second version I almost broke my eyes, especially when in italics))
    1. Cry
      Cry 12 September 2019 06: 28
      -2
      Ask the FSB, they will rinse your gut, as it should.
  3. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 11 September 2019 11: 27
    0
    The "answer" for enemy submarines will be very tough .....
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 11 September 2019 11: 47
      +4
      I agree ... but only with reliable means of detection and target designation ....
      at all times, we had no particular problems with the means of destruction of submarines ...
      which cannot be said about acoustics, especially for PLNK ...
      now, without a "number" in acoustics, anti-submariners are very tight ... I hope that they will solve this problem too soon ...
      1. YOUR
        YOUR 11 September 2019 12: 04
        0
        Anti-submarine complex, like other anti-..... it is not only a launcher.
        1. kepmor
          kepmor 11 September 2019 12: 21
          0
          Vladimir, I agree ... but the HAC (GAS, BUGAS, OGAS) on the PLNK in the anti-submarine complex never entered, but only mated with it ... an example of this - URPK-3,4 ...
          although everything is changing ... maybe they will unite, finally, everything is put together ...
          1. YOUR
            YOUR 11 September 2019 12: 37
            0
            So what? Is this on the ship? To unite there is a BIUS
            1. Fizik M
              Fizik M 11 September 2019 16: 46
              -3
              To unite there is a BIUS

              our underwater BIUS is more likely to "disconnect" angry
    2. Chaldon48
      Chaldon48 11 September 2019 11: 57
      0
      It all depends on whether the GOS torpedoes can for that short time while the torpedo can maintain mobility to detect the target.
      1. kepmor
        kepmor 11 September 2019 12: 06
        0
        add also the ability to select targets of the GOS torpedoes ...
        it is extremely difficult to figure out where the GPA means, where is the simulator of the submarine and where the submarine itself is without "numbers in the head" ...
        1. Fizik M
          Fizik M 11 September 2019 16: 47
          +3
          Quote: kepmor
          it is extremely difficult to figure out where the GPA means, where is the simulator of the submarine and where the submarine itself is without "numbers in the head" ...

          this was done with us in 70x on APR-2 in analogue
          and the figure on this topic lives in products from the end of 80x - the beginning of 90x
        2. Chaldon48
          Chaldon48 11 September 2019 17: 38
          0
          Real weapons can only be checked in real combat. Of course, specially to him, being in their right mind, no one will bring.
      2. garri-lin
        garri-lin 11 September 2019 12: 12
        0
        There, in theory, after splashing, the range should be minimal.
        1. kepmor
          kepmor 11 September 2019 12: 35
          0
          not a fact ... depending on the reliability of the contact, the nature of maneuvering and determining the elements of the target's movement, the methods of firing are different ...
          the minimum distance is only when firing at a predetermined place of the target, if the submarine stupidly does not deviate in course, depth and speed ... but it's just nonsense ...
          1. garri-lin
            garri-lin 11 September 2019 13: 21
            +1
            Flight time is scanty. Although it is not known for sure, in any case the boat will have time to leave well for a couple of kilometers. Not much for a rocket head. The question is different. Will the ship that launched the "response" be able to transmit corrective data to the torpedo? Here's a catchy idea. And at the present stage it is also doable.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 11 September 2019 19: 32
            +4
            Quote: kepmor
            the minimum distance is only when firing at a predetermined place of the target, if the submarine stupidly does not deviate in course, depth and speed ... but it's just nonsense ...

            Lesh, well, you give! No.
            Minimum distance ... in a duel situation? Always talked about minimal time. And this is shooting at the target’s real place, with little preparation, possibly only identifying the side of the target’s movement (target’s side) ...
            For firing at a prearranged spot, an EDC is needed, and this is a time that will not be in a duel situation. Full EDC can be obtained, as a rule, when shooting according to the VII (spit or pointing), it is possible from the Coastal system or PBA ...
            But, most likely, at first I will have to work with the "Packet", because it is difficult for me to imagine (without PLO aircraft) that NK would be the first to attack a combat-ready submarine!
            Therefore, probably the name was given PLURO - "Answer", so that it was clear WHAT was expected of it. And all errors in place and EDC should be selected by a "smart" torpedo (underwater projectile) with its advanced sensors and on-board computers ...
            It seems to me somehow, however ... From the experience of the CRC-PLO.
            But, better and more accurately, a respected Mina (Max Klimov) can illuminate the issue, because he is a pro! yes
            1. Fizik M
              Fizik M 11 September 2019 21: 13
              -1
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              For firing at a prearranged spot, an EDC is needed, and this is a time that will not be in a duel situation.

              will
              in the presence of VIP (ШП) and a doppler one parcel is enough
              etc.
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              It’s hard for me to imagine (without PLO aviation) that the NK would be the first to attack a combat-ready submarine!

              No problem
              for example, NUPV Melentiev was a very big supporter of the "long arm" of the submarine - because "had the pleasure" of hitting his RTMK "like a chicken in the snip" a pair of BOD pr.1155 with "Trumpet" (with practical torpedo guidance) and vertices
  4. Igor Borisov_2
    Igor Borisov_2 11 September 2019 11: 32
    0
    The complex is designed for installation on ships of the class frigate, corvette, cruiser

    I did not notice IPC class ships in this list. We are not very ....
    1. ser56
      ser56 11 September 2019 11: 39
      0
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      I did not notice IPC class ships in this list.

      But how do they find submarines? laughing
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 11 September 2019 16: 03
      +2
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      I did not notice IPC class ships in this list.

      So the only IPC of the Russian Navy are "Albatrosses", which still remember Gorbachev. If we put PLUR on them, then after the exit from modernization, in terms of service life, there is a direct road to cutting.
      And there will be no new IPC. In the best case, there will be OVR corvettes.
    3. Fizik M
      Fizik M 11 September 2019 16: 48
      0
      because PLURs stick at UVP, although an inclined start is urgently needed
    4. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 11 September 2019 19: 38
      +2
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      I did not notice IPC class ships in this list

      They need to grow up (in terms of displacement!), But then it will be corvettes ...
      Quote: ser56
      But how do they find submarines?
      By smell ... like Mukhtar laughing
  5. Igor Borisov_2
    Igor Borisov_2 11 September 2019 11: 42
    0
    Quote: ser56
    Quote: Igor Borisov_2
    I did not notice IPC class ships in this list.

    But how do they find submarines? laughing

    And how are sub ships of other classes looking? Underhand and towed GAS ...
  6. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 September 2019 11: 49
    -2
    How does it work and where can I see it?
  7. K-36
    K-36 11 September 2019 12: 58
    +3
    Quote: Ros 56
    How does it work and where can I see it?


    In the design office, where he, in fact, is being developed. Want a peek? what
    Good luck then... good
  8. Sarduor
    Sarduor 11 September 2019 14: 00
    0
    I see Response working in conjunction with anti-submarine aircraft, and more likely anti-submarine helicopters. The first are looking for a target, and are engaged in target designation for missile torpedoes. Although judging by the publication, the answer itself may find the goal.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 11 September 2019 19: 45
      +1
      Quote: Sarduor
      The answer itself can find the goal.

      This is how, if not a secret? Straight without BUGAS, peering over the jump layer? Yes on 50-70 km? (Closer his boat is the first to attack).
      Or do you rely on torpedoes for GOS, so she has the first type of hydrology D obn = 1500-2000м - and it’s good if it will be so!
  9. Fizik M
    Fizik M 11 September 2019 16: 50
    0
    mdYa ... interesting statement;)
    looks like "the old State contract has been torn and a new one has been signed" (NEW terms)
    "and about" The answer is the same ";)

    about "Answer" at 1.57 by timing
  10. Kaw
    Kaw 11 September 2019 18: 30
    0
    Interestingly, these are anti-submarine missiles that should be produced from universal launchers for calibers?
  11. AAK
    AAK 11 September 2019 20: 26
    0
    Tests of the new PLRK are good, but only in the photo at the beginning of the article, for some reason, the launch of a "mosquito" with a RKVP of the "Bora" type is shown
  12. Vlad Vlad (Shimas)
    Vlad Vlad (Shimas) 12 September 2019 22: 18
    0
    with the surname Krivoruchko it is better to stay away from the plants. they are genes.
  13. Mister who
    Mister who 13 September 2019 20: 32
    0
    Brother, are you kidding me, if the submarine in the launch area reached the target of 1000-2000 km and shot off the entire nuclear ammunition, what the fuck answer is, it has completed its mission and can easily be knocked out. It is necessary to develop means of detection, means of destruction are enough, and better means of counterintelligence))))
  14. Mister who
    Mister who 13 September 2019 20: 53
    0
    The system of underwater vehicles (submarines) is the answer (retaliation) system, when nuclear charges are torn over its own territory, it guarantees a retaliatory strike against the enemy (the task is to work out nuclear ammunition over the enemy’s territory), and after what happens, even if the answer arrives, the main thing to do is the task, the answer system is a late fight, even under the USSR there was a task to deliver a preemptive strike despite the victims - hundreds lie down, you save hundreds of thousands, it makes sense to play ahead of the curve, and the answer system is already late !!!!
  15. Mister who
    Mister who 13 September 2019 21: 05
    0
    Who knows - the GDR of the KGB, saboteurs - the task was to disable the perchs, knowing the exact time of launches, this is the topic, suicide bombers. practiced even at that time, counterintelligence rules.