Military Review

Global Warming Myths

42
In recent decades, they talk and write a lot about global warming. For the first time, scientists started talking about this process in the 60 of the 20 century.


Global Warming Myths


The very problem of global climate change was first voiced at the UN level in the 80's. Today, new scientific hypotheses are constantly appearing in the media that often contradict each other and thereby mislead people. The problem of global warming for many has turned into a “global confusion”: there is talk of global warming, and in July the weather in the middle zone is October, but in September it is warmer than in July.

Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences Vladimir Polevanov, guest of the Day TV channel, believes that global warming is a complete lie, humanity is purposefully trying to hang noodles on their ears. Talking about the need to deal with carbon dioxide is pure fraud. He exposes the traditional myths of global warming on our planet.

What is really happening with the climate on the planet? Who benefits from promoting global warming? Why is it necessary to talk not about global warming, but about global cooling? How should Russia behave in this situation? Answers to these and other questions in the video:

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rocket757
    rocket757 11 September 2019 07: 27 New
    +3
    Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences Vladimir Polevanov, guest of the Day TV channel, believes that global warming is a complete lie, humanity is purposefully trying to hang noodles on their ears.

    "Game" for a very long time !!! Some people want to get benefits right now, this is expected. And when everything really becomes clear, who was right ??? Whether those living today will survive to that moment is a big question!
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 11 September 2019 09: 06 New
      0
      I don’t know whether warming or cooling is going on, but the climate has clearly changed, in Moscow it has become very rainy and cold, in Tatarstan it has become warmer and there is more sun, hurricanes began to occur more often in the middle part of Russia, before this did not happen at all.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 11 September 2019 09: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: Svarog
        the climate has clearly changed

        There are changes, we all see it!
        But, according to the same scientists, many, it all fits into a certain natural cycle that lasts for decades, centuries, and even millennia! Here's how to judge, take someone's specific side!
        We will just live, adapt to what we have right now!
  2. Sergst
    Sergst 11 September 2019 07: 34 New
    -3
    There are many myths and they are tenacious. In addition to global warming, the myth that forests are “light planets” and they are a source of oxygen is very tenacious. Although everyone in the school was taught that the reaction of photosynthesis is reversible and equilibrium. And the myth lives on ...
    1. demo
      demo 11 September 2019 09: 07 New
      +6
      Do you think that the forest is not "light planets"?
      Well, well.
      You just compare the indicators of our Ministry of Health for pulmonary diseases in remote from the cities of Siberian villages and large cities.
      Even worse.
      Over the past 20 years, the number of newborns with chronic diseases (i.e., those received at the stage of fetal formation, its formation and development) has approached 100%. In 9 out of 10 newborns these diseases are fixed.
      Okay !?

      I could tell a lot about how the struggle for ecology turns into a struggle with ecology.
      Only VO is not the place where you need to say it.
      And believe me, I am an expert consultant in a company that is developing innovative products designed to significantly reduce exhaust emissions.
      I at least a little, but I understand what is happening.

      By the way.
      Floods in Siberia, the Kuban, and the Stavropol Territory are primarily the lack of vegetation, soil degradation, low water retention by vegetation, and as a result, its concentration in river beds that simply cannot physically transfer it to natural reservoirs - lakes, seas and oceans.

      Read it.
      "Stalin's landing. If he could plant more!
      In 1948 When Europe was still recovering from the consequences of a devastating war, the USSR, on Stalin's initiative, issued a decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks of October 20, 1948 “On a plan of field-afforestation plantations, introduction of grass crop rotation, construction of ponds and ponds to ensure high sustainable crops in the steppe and forest-steppe regions of the European part of the USSR. " In print, this document was called the "Stalinist plan for the transformation of nature."

      The fifteen-year program of scientific regulation of nature, which has no analogues in world practice, was developed on the basis of the works of prominent Russian agronomists.
      According to the plan for the transformation of nature, a grand attack on drought began by planting forest stands, introducing grassland crop rotation, building ponds and ponds. The strength of this plan was in a single will, complexity and scale. The plan had no precedent in world experience in scale.

      According to this magnificent plan, over 15 years 8 large state forest protection zones with a total length of over 5.300 kilometers will be created, protective forest plantations with a total area of ​​5.709 thousand hectares will be created on the fields of collective farms and state farms, and by 1955 44.228 ponds and reservoirs will be built on collective farms and state farms . All this, combined with advanced Soviet agricultural technology, will provide high, stable, weather-independent crops in an area of ​​over 120 million hectares. Crop harvested from this area of ​​crops is enough to feed half of the inhabitants of the Earth. The central place in the plan was occupied by afforestation and irrigation "......
      And so on.
      https://shibaev.livejournal.com/147431.html
      Well, let's argue?
      Or we agree that we must correctly deal with nature.
      You need to understand where everything will lead.
      And it is necessary to identify unscrupulous politicians who use such a burning topic for their selfish interests.
      1. bar
        bar 11 September 2019 09: 40 New
        0
        Quote: demo
        Floods in Siberia, Kuban, Stavropol Territory - this is before the lack of vegetation,

        Something you all have in common. And the low water in the Volga region, the shallowing of the Volga up to the cessation of shipping - a consequence of excessive vegetation or what?
        1. demo
          demo 11 September 2019 09: 52 New
          +1
          Lack of vegetation.
          Ponds with vegetation along the banks, shallow slower than those that do not have vegetation.
          The forest not only “drinks water” in its pure form, but it absorbs it from the surrounding air and accumulates in its trunks, leaves.
          Those. Forest is a storehouse of moisture.
          Where is the contradiction?

          Flooding is a process that occurs if the soil cannot absorb all the moisture that has fallen as a result of precipitation.
          Saturation of the soil reaches its limit and moisture begins to rush, under the influence of the law of gravity into the nearest channel of the stream.
          And there are thousands of such streams.
          And there is a river.
          The channel capacity is limited.
          There is water congestion.
          And the water ran in different directions.

          Available?

          And where is the forest?
          But the forest is not there. They cut it and sold it.
      2. Sergst
        Sergst 11 September 2019 11: 44 New
        0
        Hmm, did I say somewhere that forests are bad ?? I just pointed out one myth, namely in terms of oxygen production by forests. No need to ascribe to me what I did not say.
    2. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 12 September 2019 21: 55 New
      -2
      Quote: Sergst
      There are many myths and they are tenacious. In addition to global warming, the myth that forests are “light planets” and they are a source of oxygen is very tenacious. Although everyone in the school was taught that the reaction of photosynthesis is reversible and equilibrium. And the myth lives on ...

      Yes, yes, all this nonsense, we were also told at school that parallel lines do not intersect, that the earth revolves around the sun, and the triangle has 3 angles, well, delirium of pure water, a myth!
  3. apro
    apro 11 September 2019 07: 45 New
    +4
    I liked about the greenhouse effect about the dangers of cars and cows and carbon dioxide. The volcanologist suggested calculating the harmfulness of the emission of an average volcano, and this exceeds what people have accumulated several times and not in one century ...
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 12 September 2019 21: 57 New
      0
      Quote: apro
      I liked about the greenhouse effect about the dangers of cars and cows and carbon dioxide. The volcanologist suggested calculating the harmfulness of the emission of an average volcano, and this exceeds what people have accumulated several times and not in one century ...

      Give calculations as an example, or at least a reference to them, otherwise it is unfounded, but not on LJ and other jaundice please
    2. Antares
      Antares 21 September 2019 21: 00 New
      -1
      Quote: apro
      I liked about the greenhouse effect about the dangers of cars and cows and carbon dioxide. The volcanologist suggested calculating the harmfulness of the emission of an average volcano, and this exceeds what people have accumulated several times and not in one century ...

      since alarmism in society is paid more and more than routine work, they will talk about the danger of all that is possible. Apocalypse of everything and as soon as possible.
      The peculiarity of human perception.
      If we paid good news more than bad news, it would be different.
      But we are happy to pay with our money / attention only alarmism.
      And almost all Nicherta do not know about paleoclimatology.
      For example, after the eruption of the Pinatubo volcano on the Philippine island of Luzon in 1991, meteorologists recorded a temporary drop in the average temperature of the Earth by 0,5 ° C.
      More serious consequences were caused by the eruption of Tambora volcano on the island of Sumbawa in 1815, reaching 7 points on the eruption scale. Throughout the year, it caused a decrease in the global average temperature by 0,4-0,7 ° C, and in some areas by 3-5 ° C, which in Europe was accompanied by frosts in mid-July, which is why 1816 was called contemporaries year without summer. Until 1819, an unusual cold snap caused crop failures and famine and contributed to the migration waves from Europe to America.
      Presumably, a similar event took place in the VI century, when in 536, 540 and 547 three strong eruptions caused the onset of the Late Antique ice age.
      For Russia, the greatest consequences may have been the eruption of the Peruvian volcano Uaynaputina in 1600, which some researchers consider the cause of cooling, crop failure and the Great Famine in 1601-1603.
      According to one theory, the eruption of the Toba volcano on the island of Sumatra 74 thousand years ago was the reason for the reduction of the entire terrestrial population of the ancestors of modern people to about 10 thousand individuals, and the synchronous super-eruption of the Phlegrean fields in the Apennines, Kazbek and St. Anna volcano in the Southern Carpathians, synchronous by geological standards about 40 thousand years ago, it may have caused the extinction of Neanderthals, numbering then from Gibraltar in the south of the Iberian Peninsula to Okladnikova Cave in Altai about 12 thousand individuals, of which 3500 are female
      What about Global Warming?
      The probable value of a possible temperature increase over the 0,3st century based on climate models will be 1,7–2,6 ° C for the minimum emission scenario; 4,8 ° C for the maximum emission scenario ...
      A couple of conditional "Tambor" and we are in a very low ...
      But let's fight ... Humanity is so bored without problems ...
      By the way, the Russian Federation plays the most from GP.
      The eternal problem with temperature and average moisture will go away.
  4. riwas
    riwas 11 September 2019 08: 02 New
    +2
    Well, yes, they also fought for their time with ozone holes. At each "intersection" they shouted, and now they are silent.
    1. skinar
      skinar 11 September 2019 08: 06 New
      +4
      well, the main task was performed by screamers: the frion refrigerant was discontinued, and less efficient refrigerants were accepted everywhere
      1. Antares
        Antares 21 September 2019 21: 01 New
        0
        Quote: skinar
        screamers

        Dupont is in the black.
        He foresaw and financed in time.
    2. bar
      bar 11 September 2019 09: 44 New
      +2
      But many good medicines in aerosol form were killed under this case. We changed the refrigerants in refrigerators and air conditioners to less efficient ones, leading to increased energy consumption.
  5. Rwmos
    Rwmos 11 September 2019 08: 07 New
    -3
    Note to the author - maybutne should not stoop to .... Operands of those to whom you say your "fi"?
    Well, and - I didn’t quite understand - Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences ... What is this news?
    1. riwas
      riwas 11 September 2019 08: 22 New
      +2
      Well - I didn’t quite understand - "Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences"

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Категория:Доктора_геолого-минералогических_наук&from=Ж
      1. Rwmos
        Rwmos 11 September 2019 13: 05 New
        -1
        U-oops ... Followed the link, found a friend. Kononov, Yuri, alas. already deceased. Only he was a geologist
  6. Igor Pa
    Igor Pa 11 September 2019 08: 31 New
    +3
    In 30 years, one machine with an internal combustion engine does as much harm as the production of one battery for Tesla does in one day. I have said everything.
    1. novel66
      novel66 11 September 2019 08: 57 New
      +2
      one Eya volcano .. fuya .. somehow there .. inflicted so much that everyone in the world of ICE will not inflict in a hundred years
    2. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 12 September 2019 21: 58 New
      -1
      Quote: Igor Pa
      In 30 years, one machine with an internal combustion engine does as much harm as the production of one battery for Tesla does in one day. I have said everything.

      Where did you read? TVNZ?
      1. Igor Pa
        Igor Pa 15 September 2019 10: 01 New
        -1
        Komsom I do not always have the opportunity to read. This is from some German’s report. I read it for myself. The report was in paper form. So I can’t give a link. It was still about ships. He compared the emissions of the cargo fleet. Everything is bad there! And if you add military and passenger, then mom close the shutters! In general, I live in Germany and the topic is not parallel to me precisely because of the brutal taxes on internal combustion engines. Here it is very actively procrastinated in the media and in the kitchens.
        https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissionen_durch_die_Schifffahrt
  7. Gust
    Gust 11 September 2019 08: 38 New
    0
    Quote: Sergst
    There are many myths and they are tenacious. In addition to global warming, the myth that forests are “light planets” and they are a source of oxygen is very tenacious. Although everyone in the school was taught that the reaction of photosynthesis is reversible and equilibrium. And the myth lives on ...

    They also taught at school that atmospheric carbon dioxide is absorbed as a result of photosynthesis, carbon is extracted from it, which is then bound in the biomass of the plant. And if this wood then does not burn out and does not decompose, for example in a swamp, there it binds for a long time in the form of peat-coal.
    The data is mixed, that's all there is to it. There have been times in the history of the Earth with a concentration of carbon dioxide twice that of the present. There were much lower ones.
  8. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 11 September 2019 08: 39 New
    +1
    Horses with cows fart 10 times a day, and a billion cars puff around the clock 365 days a year, burning millions of liters of gasoline and solariums. The “volcano” is on wheels, but for some reason the “scientists” are inclined to think that livestock farming is to blame for the warming, including the suggestion that they grow artificial meat. I believe that a steak from this “protein plastic” will cost more than the whole cow, but someone on this technology wants to earn a lot of money by plucking large-horned ones to the root. The more global the world, the more global the scam. request
    1. Antares
      Antares 21 September 2019 21: 04 New
      0
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      "scientists" are inclined to the idea that animal husbandry is to blame for warming, including the suggestion

      sorry, but how to stop the ocean?
      It is the main source of gases (along with volcanoes) on the planet. It absorbs the most and emits the most.
      Compared to the planet, humanity is just an insect ..
      the planet gas is much cooler
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 21 September 2019 23: 41 New
        +1
        Quote: Antares
        sorry, but how to stop the ocean?

        This question should be addressed to scientists, but I just focused on the cows with horses, which they indicate as one of the causes of climate warming. It is clear that humanity is "just an insect", but the fact that this "insect" changes the face of the planet is unambiguous. And not for the better. hi
  9. Pavel57
    Pavel57 11 September 2019 09: 21 New
    0
    Well, you decide that there is a warming or cooling? But then that everyone rushed to the north (Northern Sea Route, Greenland?).
  10. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
    SERGEY SERGEEVICS 11 September 2019 09: 27 New
    +2
    In recent decades, they talk and write a lot about global warming.

    This is a normal natural phenomenon that occurs in nature, it used to be and there is nothing wrong with that and it didn’t exist. And now, just someone decided to raise money from this and begin to promote it and untwist it.
    1. riwas
      riwas 11 September 2019 09: 51 New
      +3
      Earth has a protective mechanism against global warming.
      With increasing temperature, the evaporation of the world's oceans rises, the sky is covered with clouds that reflect sunlight.
      1. psiho117
        psiho117 11 September 2019 10: 16 New
        +1
        Quote: riwas
        With increasing temperature, the evaporation of the world's oceans rises, the sky is covered with clouds that reflect sunlight.

        Humidity also rises, from which more precipitation condenses.
        Here is such a paradox - with global warming - on the contrary it will be colder in winter: there will be snowstorms, hurricanes and more rain
        1. KJIETyc
          KJIETyc 11 September 2019 15: 56 New
          0
          In Belarus (!) A subtropical zone of agriculture appeared. Cool, you say? 2 weeks of winter maximum.
          1. psiho117
            psiho117 12 September 2019 02: 26 New
            0
            Quote: KJIETyc
            Cool, you say

            incorrectly put it - rather more severe, albeit short. But with blizzards, snow and a half meters, icy rains, etc.
      2. Vol4ara
        Vol4ara 12 September 2019 22: 08 New
        -1
        Quote: riwas
        Earth has a protective mechanism against global warming.
        With increasing temperature, the evaporation of the world's oceans rises, the sky is covered with clouds that reflect sunlight.

        Sit down 2. Steam is the most efficient greenhouse gas. The ocean albedo is an order of magnitude lower than that of land, the more water, the more light is absorbed, the faster the planet warms up
      3. Antares
        Antares 21 September 2019 21: 05 New
        0
        Quote: riwas
        Earth has a protective mechanism against global warming.

        volcanic cycle
        the past was relatively calm
    2. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 11 September 2019 10: 58 New
      0
      The issue is not that the climate is changing. The climate is changing the whole history of the Earth. The only question is the speed of change. If a significant change occurs over hundreds and thousands of years, then all living things have time to adapt and live in a new climate with minimal losses. If a major climate change occurs in a few decades - this is a disaster for the biosphere. This is the whole trick. This troubles has been happening for the last 150 years with a ponytail. And with an ever increasing speed. And this is very correlated with the development of industry on our planet.
  11. Gestas
    Gestas 11 September 2019 09: 33 New
    +1
    Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences Vladimir Polevanov
    discussing climate change, and why not a climatologist? Here we have one mathematician who trampled on history, now another amateur is climbing into someone else's field.
  12. U-58
    U-58 11 September 2019 12: 35 New
    0
    Some kind of half material.
    Myths indicated, questions asked ... And not a single answer.
    At least in the form of a hypothesis
  13. KJIETyc
    KJIETyc 11 September 2019 15: 54 New
    0
    September 11 +30 on the street - is it cooling? Author, go out at last!
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 12 September 2019 22: 09 New
      -1
      Quote: KJIETyc
      September 11 +30 on the street - is it cooling? Author, go out at last!

      Do not confuse the weather and climate. But the video is not very, here you are right
  14. nikvic46
    nikvic46 13 September 2019 06: 28 New
    0
    That there is speculation on warming is a fact.
  15. kig
    kig 13 September 2019 06: 32 New
    0
    Melting polar ice is also obviously a myth.