Military Review

Mikhail Leontyev: “Russia currently does not have the resources to physically protect Syria”

121
Mikhail Leontyev: “Russia currently does not have the resources to physically protect Syria”

Of course, it would be unfair to deny the efforts and certain individual tactical successes of Russian diplomacy, which does not bend and forces them to retreat from the proclaimed declarations.

At present, Asad will win any free elections.



If we talk about the text (Declaration of the Geneva Conference. - Approx. KM.RU), then the refusal to accept the amendment on illegal shipments weapons Syria is absolutely transparent. If the supply of weapons is illegal, then how can you oppose the adoption of a resolution against illegal deliveries? .. That is, from a diplomatic point of view, this is absurd. And even if such an absurdity does not cause any problems, then the position is understandable.

In fact, all these negotiations are negotiations about nothing. It is possible that this is a gain in time, although it is unclear who wants to gain time in this case, because there are two ways to solve it in the Syrian issue. No peaceful contacts, no coalition, no free elections are able to resolve the issue.

It is completely obvious that at present, Assad will win any free elections. But to hold free elections in Syria is technically impossible, so this is a meaningless conversation. Now it is impossible neither theoretically nor practically, because the position of the West is still in the demolition of the Assad government and support for the rebels, in supporting their intransigence.

The second option is to let Assad kill the bastard who is waging war against his own country.

One way of developing the situation is that there will be a big slaughter, and the result will be determined when the smoke clears and the blood flows. But the result is unpredictable, especially since Syria is not an isolated country: it all goes in the context that exists in the region, among its neighbors, etc.

The second option is to let Assad kill the bastard who wages a war against his own country with the participation of foreigners. This is the only way to save the country, there are no other options. This is obvious to all observers, even biased. From this point of view, paying tribute to Russian diplomacy, I would nevertheless be forced to state that in strategic and even medium-term terms, this is all - talking about nothing.

No one knows how events will develop, but it is clear that if you torment a country with the use of means that are used now, then sooner or later, the so-called. Assad's regime will fall. He can not fall, because the population is just tired. Even if it supports him now, it is impossible to exist in an atmosphere of a growing nightmare, especially since all this is accompanied by both economic pressure and continuous terror. People just get tired.

I do not know what we can do. In fact, Russia currently does not possess such resources and weight to be able to physically protect Syria. If Syria itself dealt with its problems, then there would no longer be any militants there. And why does the opposition insist on external intervention, not simply on support or help, but on intervention? Because it considers as its main task the organization of external intervention. Because she is in no way able to cope at the moment with military tasks.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru
121 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. volcano
    volcano 10 July 2012 07: 14
    +8
    Let’s hope that Assad will have enough time, which Russia gives him with such difficulty together with China.
    After Syria, there will be Iran for anyone, and then we will not be good. The war will be at our doorstep.
    1. ughhh
      ughhh 10 July 2012 09: 39
      +4
      Russia and China are doing what they need - they are holding back any shusher from sinking into the internal affairs of Syria. And hell is clear that Russia does not have any resources to fight against NATO with America at the head. They have hundreds of times more weapons. So do not ...
      1. Facturin
        Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 20
        +8
        If Assad is demolished, the militants will be left without work, and they cannot be unemployed. What will they do? If they are not set against Iran, they will smash the whole Middle East. Yes, and our Caucasus will not escape their attention ... Moreover, the number of people who want to fight is growing and growing!
    2. Tirpitz
      Tirpitz 10 July 2012 09: 39
      +7
      Assad, unfortunately, is no longer enough time. the noose around the neck is tightened. In Iran, the economic crisis, people are starting to worry, soon they will not be able to help Syria. Syria, slowly (maybe during the next year) but they will finish it.
      1. revnagan
        revnagan 10 July 2012 11: 02
        +3
        Quote: Tirpitz
        Syria, slowly (maybe during the next year) but they will finish it.

        Yes, it’s like that. Waging war by economic and political methods. Not by washing, so by skating, but to achieve our goal. And Russia does not have the resources to counter this.
        1. Facturin
          Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 33
          +8
          Our Bashar is too long to mess with bandits! They didn’t see his actions. They shot and ran, observers arrived, counted the corpses, each made his own conclusions, refuting the opponent’s conclusions ... and that’s it! And so, day after day ... Smash so smash, otherwise he was going to save himself and Syria. His army, in any case, is more than all the militants combined.
          1. Midshipman
            Midshipman 10 July 2012 22: 02
            +1
            Apparently Assad does not feel moral strength behind him, otherwise he would have put all the rebels in cancer long ago, imposed a curfew and all that is supposed to be, but he would have achieved order. I can’t believe that having a reliable regular army, you can’t clean out these invaders in half with criminals.
      2. Brother Sarych
        Brother Sarych 10 July 2012 13: 37
        -5
        They don’t finish it, they’ll surrender ...
        1. ole
          ole 10 July 2012 18: 12
          -8
          Quote: Brother Sarich
          Do not finish, so surrender ..

          Exactly and very true, and the trend has been going on for a long time (on delivery), they simply can’t agree on price.
          1. ole
            ole 11 July 2012 22: 13
            0
            Well, where are the arguments, ours are either sending weapons, then Lavrov agrees either they don’t send everyone clearly, then they suddenly seek consensus, if they take time, then for whom, Assad hell only and he’ll do nothing, I’d already Turkey air defense covers.
      3. Nick
        Nick 10 July 2012 19: 29
        +2
        Quote: Tirpitz
        Syria, slowly (maybe during the next year) but they will finish it.

        You may be right, dear Tirpitz, but, in my opinion, every day of Bashar al-Assad’s resistance gives us time to prepare for a possible future major conflict in the Middle East.
        1. Harlin
          Harlin 10 July 2012 21: 09
          +3
          Nick,
          The ships have already left. Our truth is that this has nothing to do with the situation in Syria, but for some reason they are not trusted in the West. request
    3. MDesant
      MDesant 11 July 2012 04: 55
      0
      And if it’s also blazing in North Korea, then we certainly won’t be greeted.
  2. Magadan
    Magadan 10 July 2012 07: 30
    +21
    "The second option is to let Assad kill the bastard who is waging war against his own country with the participation of foreigners. This is the only way to save the country. There are no other options.."

    But the whole article that such an option is not feasible ?! Michael! Are you also mentally preparing us for the surrender of Syria? What are these carts for? Are Russia and China unable to help Assad organize a border guard so that foreigners cannot get into the country? Really these bandits cannot be stupidly starved? And the people of Syria, those who are for Assad, are sent food products using their registered grocery cards? And buy food from Russian agricultural producers on donations from Russians?
    Our people will not tolerate surrender to Syria !!! Give people the opportunity to help whoever can and how can and the bald horse that NATO will!
    1. valokordin
      valokordin 10 July 2012 07: 42
      +21
      Magadan, you are right. The position of Leontiev is incomprehensible; he claims to be the prophet. Assad must be supported morally and by military supplies. Engage his allies to help and do not hesitate to act as anti-terrorist forces. Allow Bashir to act quickly and efficiently, and not pretend to be peacekeepers. These negotiators, if they come to power, God forbid, they will drown the Russians and Christians in Syria in blood. We must by all means protect our citizens.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 10 July 2012 08: 38
        +10
        Guys ...
        where does Leontyev’s position stand?
        The usual laws of the genre and PR technologies.
        You will not be declared - in a week you will be forgotten. And they will not remember. And then you lose the rating.
        ...
        Normal, passage article.
        The usual mark ... in the report card - I am alive, I am acting.
        ...
        And Leontiev’s opinion is like, let's see, we’ll see, it’s becoming interesting.
        That's all.
        1. spdm
          spdm 10 July 2012 10: 44
          +4
          Quote: Igarr
          And Leontiev’s opinion is like, let's see, we’ll see, it’s becoming interesting.
          And all

          Leontiev’s rhetoric has changed, from Assad’s unequivocal support to some ambiguous and wary stance. Leontiev is close to the Kremlin and understands where the wind is blowing. After the statement of the Syrian opposition about successful negotiations held in Moscow. There was no refutation or comment by the Foreign Ministry. The conclusion suggests itself .....
        2. Facturin
          Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 28
          +7
          Quote: Igarr
          Common laws of the genre and PR technologies

          A journalist cannot do without extremes. Extremes attract attention, excite, make you argue ... And Leontyev’s proximity to the Kremlin is purely geographical. Who will dedicate this to deep geopolitical plans!
          1. spdm
            spdm 10 July 2012 11: 39
            +3
            Quote: Facturin
            Who will devote such a thing to deep geopolitical plans!

            Of course, if these are just not the case when everything is decided and it remains only to prepare public opinion
            1. Facturin
              Facturin 10 July 2012 12: 46
              +6
              spdm,
              But judging by us, such childish forwarding is ineffective!
              We are not so full as to live in the opinion of others.
        3. PARTISAN
          PARTISAN 10 July 2012 13: 20
          +1
          Correctly said. + Big to you! You shouldn't make such conclusions from his television platform. Take Iran, they were already at the first stage of the current exercises, practicing methods of struggle in a "psychological war." And if pessimistic forecasts start pouring out of the lips of the allies, then the morale will drop not only among the military, but indeed, among the entire Syrian people, and as stated in the article "the people will simply get tired."
    2. Kaa
      Kaa 10 July 2012 09: 29
      +6
      The article is written in such a tone that parallels such as "The Chechen war could not have ended well for Russia, because the people would simply be tired" suggests themselves. If we do not give the possibility of outside intervention, Assad will sort it out inside the country.
    3. Professor
      Professor 10 July 2012 10: 28
      0
      Our people will not tolerate surrender to Syria !!! Give people the opportunity to help whoever can and how can and the bald horse that NATO will!

      What is the problem? Here are the cheap Moscow - Damascus tickets. Go to the rescue of the Assad regime.
      Flights to Damascus (Syria) (495) 543-34-44
      1. spdm
        spdm 10 July 2012 11: 51
        +4
        Quote: Professor
        What is the problem? Here are the cheap Moscow - Damascus tickets. Go to the rescue of the Assad regime.

        Damn yourself 740 bucks a ticket, for the money you can save Egypt 2 times bully
        1. Professor
          Professor 10 July 2012 11: 55
          -1
          When it comes to "saving" Syria, talking about money is not appropriate. wink
          1. spdm
            spdm 10 July 2012 11: 58
            +2
            Quote: Professor
            When it comes to "saving" Syria, talking about money is not appropriate.

            maybe you're right, but you can get 2 times more medals in Sharm for a long time and the trenches are dug and the positions are equipped
          2. Odessa
            Odessa 10 July 2012 12: 20
            +1
            Professor,
            Talk about money is not appropriate when it comes to "saving" Syria

            What your problems are, it’s close to Syria, therefore it’s inappropriate, ask any camel how to get to Damascus and Nazareth by taxi can be either to Syria or Jordan. Hot tour packages to Damascus now with tremendous discounts.
            spdm
            Damn yourself 740 bucks a ticket, for the money you can save Egypt 2 times

            Where does the electric one take you? Refrain from trips to Egypt, and in particular to Sinai, because you warned, you'll be more whole!
            1. Professor
              Professor 10 July 2012 13: 58
              +2
              I am not going to help the "people" of Syria or its government, so for me how to get there is not important, but those who are so eager to rake in the heat of someone else's hands can indicate where to order tickets.
            2. spdm
              spdm 10 July 2012 14: 55
              +2
              Quote: Odessa
              And where does the electric carry you?

              Well, then we will reach our wires wherever you want, even to Odessa, or to any city in Israel with numerous Odessa suburbs drinks
          3. CC-20a
            CC-20a 11 July 2012 06: 12
            0
            but why go, do not go anywhere the red button and the start of the Strategic Missile Forces. It’s not for nothing that our grandfathers created this miracle ... precisely in order to not have to go anywhere but just sitting at home ...
      2. Arc76
        Arc76 10 July 2012 19: 14
        +1
        Five points professor. Those who wish to stand up for the interests of the Syrian king reign in a breeze and go to the front. good
    4. antiaircrafter
      antiaircrafter 10 July 2012 11: 27
      +1
      Quote: Magadan
      Our people will not tolerate surrender to Syria !!!

      The people, for the most part, are absolutely parallel to the fate of Syria.
    5. Midshipman
      Midshipman 10 July 2012 22: 15
      +1
      What does starvation mean? The most decisive action! Uncompromisingly and without looking back. Any self-respecting leader would have acted that way. At one time, smart people proposed to Saddam during the American threat to capture and mine the Qatari and Saudi industries, the explosion of which would lead to the collapse of the then American economy, and he fell asleep - he thought he would breed Musi-Pusi ​​with him.
  3. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 10 July 2012 07: 47
    +11
    Statements by the Russian side to suspend military supplies (under previously concluded contracts) should be regarded as treason.
    Under the fool and wimp, everyone knows how to mow.
    But take and protect, not by direct participation, but by the execution of contracts.
    1. alexng
      alexng 10 July 2012 08: 35
      +1
      Please link to an official statement from Russia, but only an official source, or any tape. Wed ...
      1. Ivan Tarasov
        Ivan Tarasov 12 July 2012 08: 21
        0
        There are no official comments on this subject.
        Information taken from Russian inform. agencies.
        However, not refuted by the official side.
    2. FREGATENKAPITAN
      FREGATENKAPITAN 10 July 2012 08: 35
      +6
      ....... Maybe not so simple ... and ours are calculating various options, including the US and NATO intervention in Syria ... in this case, our newest air defense systems and other weapons immediately fall into the hands of our "FRIENDS" ...... and by the way, we won't wait for payment of the bills ... as in the case of Iraq or Libya ...
      I think that the already delivered weapons will be enough to suppress internal resistance ...... but it will not come to the invasion ... (this is what we, the PRC need to prevent by all available means) .... ..
      1. Facturin
        Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 35
        +6
        Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
        ...... but before the invasion, it still doesn’t reach

        There will be no Iraq, but Libya - easily!
    3. Kaa
      Kaa 10 July 2012 17: 09
      +4
      Will such a protection fit in the first case?
      The large anti-submarine ship Admiral Chabanenko and three large landing ships sailed from Severomorsk to the Mediterranean Sea on Tuesday, where they are scheduled to call at the Syrian port of Tartus.

      “The program of the voyage calls for calling at the Syrian port of Tartus, where the naval logistics center is located,” a military-diplomatic source said. According to him, during this trip, the Baltic Fleet’s patrol ship “Yaroslav the Wise” and auxiliary fleet ships will join the Northern Fleet’s ships. The interlocutor of the agency said that the ships of the Northern Fleet’s marine corps are on board the ships. According to him, the detachment’s campaign is in accordance with the plans for combat training of the Navy. It is not connected with the aggravation of the situation in Syria. “The ships in the port of Tartus will replenish fuel, water and food supplies,” the source added. The large anti-submarine ship Admiral Chabanenko, project 11551, is armed with supersonic anti-ship missiles “Mosquito” and the unique anti-submarine complex “Vodopad-NK”. Mine-torpedo armament - 2 quad launchers of anti-ship missile launchers Moskit, 2 anti-submarine rocket-propelled bombing installations and 2 Ka-27 helicopters. The crew is 220 people. The range is 3000 nautical miles.
  4. TRex
    TRex 10 July 2012 07: 48
    +11
    Breshet Bear about the lack of resources.
    Say - there is no political will or even a desire to contradict their overseas owners.
  5. Trailer
    Trailer 10 July 2012 08: 00
    +5
    "In fact, Russia at the moment does not have such resources and weight to be able to physically defend Syria ..." Nonsense of a gray gelding. Why, if we had to solve the problem with South Ossetia, did we beat down on the opinion of the whole world and go ahead, knocking the Americans out of Tskhinval? Why, if we had to solve the problem with our militants, who were supported by the West, then we razed entire villages and cities to the ground? Now what: "No physical ability?" Is there a lot of belly or shells out? It is not the country that lacks strength, but those who make decisions on behalf of this country! If they wanted to, they would have helped Syria long ago with instructors and weapons. But, you see, the forces are not enough, the West will scold! The modern world of wild capitalism respects strength! And the weak are pinched. In the words of the author, we are weak! And that means we will be pinched!
    1. antiaircrafter
      antiaircrafter 10 July 2012 11: 29
      +1
      Quote: Karavan
      or did the shells run out?

      Shells exploded right in the warehouses ...
    2. lotus04
      lotus04 10 July 2012 15: 10
      +2
      Quote: Karavan
      If they wanted, they would have long helped Syria with instructors and weapons. But, you see, there are few forces, the West will curse! The modern world of wild capitalism respects power! A weak squeeze. In the words of the author, we are weak! And that means they will pinch us!


      Raise the bombers into the air, declare the territory of Syria and Iran a zone of their vital interests and regard any attack on their territory as their own. We need to learn from someone, we will have the same, arrogance is the second happiness. This is the end of the war. Try, let drool and stop. No one will fight with us. Let us announce a boycott, impose sanctions, funerals, have already passed. We have a self-sufficient state, we have everything unlike them. We can introduce energy sanctions to them. There will be an incentive to grow by ourselves, to develop production and agriculture. Only this is most likely not beneficial to our ..... And then the WTO will not accept.
      1. Trailer
        Trailer 10 July 2012 16: 36
        -1
        Quote: lotus04
        Let us announce a boycott, impose sanctions, poh ..., have already passed.
        Here is more accurate:
        1. Freezing the stabilization fund of Russia, stored in the United States.
        2. Freezing the accounts of our officials.
        3. Our hind legs. And whale !!!
        1. jokes
          jokes 10 July 2012 19: 37
          +4
          Russia has long since withdrawn most of its money from the United States. And our stabilization fund was never kept by amers fool
    3. Arc76
      Arc76 10 July 2012 19: 18
      +4
      I also think that Kazakhstan needs to support Syria and send troops there. And we will see ....
  6. Goga
    Goga 10 July 2012 08: 17
    +9
    Somehow joyfully after the article of my respected M. Leontyev .... It’s understandable that it’s not physically possible, that is, in a direct military confrontation — that’s understandable, but we didn’t fight directly in Syria even before the USSR, but we found ways to provide assistance.
    Indeed, this whole situation cannot but suggest some kind of "bargaining", only in my opinion this is just the case when "bargaining is not appropriate", the wrong "partners" to bargain with - will blow again ... what
    1. Armata
      Armata 10 July 2012 08: 39
      +7
      Greetings Igor. If you think about the meaning of bargaining in Russia is the cessation of financing bandits and the ability of Assad’s troops to clean up their house and prepare to repel external aggression, otherwise Russia and China will be untied.
      1. Goga
        Goga 10 July 2012 08: 57
        +5
        Steam engine - Greetings, Eugene! It’s clear that ours is dragging on time, but it’s not infinite, and Assad needs to move sharper somehow. For thousands, every rabble fells across the Syrian border - is that Assad is not already able to take these borders under control? Well, and how should he help, then? You can help someone who helps himself, and if Bashar snot chews, who will fight for him?
        1. Goga
          Goga 10 July 2012 09: 58
          +6
          However, Bashar does not seem to chew "snot", here is the message - "The Syrian special forces carried out a successful operation to liberate the town of Morek from the Hama province, the settlements of Khan Sheikhun and Taman A of the Idlib province from the militants. Instead of the allotted three days, the whole operation took six hours. During the fighting. many militants were killed and wounded, 62 terrorists were taken prisoner and are now giving confessions ... "
          1. Armata
            Armata 10 July 2012 10: 08
            +8
            Well, good news. I said that our ZHZHZHZHZHZHZHZ is not easy. Soon so far, there was no panic command bully .
          2. Yarbay
            Yarbay 10 July 2012 10: 59
            +5
            Dear Igor!
            Today another message came that Russia was suspending the supply of Syrian weapons until the end of hostilities !!
            http://defence.az/news/a-1968.html
            1. Facturin
              Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 39
              +8
              Yarbay,
              Weapons can be delivered through other channels, without entering into direct confrontation with our "partners". There are a lot of options.
              1. Yarbay
                Yarbay 10 July 2012 11: 44
                +1
                I'm not talking about Zahar!
                ** Weapons can be delivered through other channels, without entering into direct confrontation with our "partners". There are a lot of options. **
                If our cause is right, then why crawl like snakes ??
                and something I didn’t see Russia use * other * channels in recent years!
                why then in the beginning * pawed * on * partners * ???
                this is another betrayal!
                1. Facturin
                  Facturin 10 July 2012 12: 48
                  +7
                  Yarbay,
                  This is a cunning maneuver to confuse the enemy! wassat
            2. Goga
              Goga 10 July 2012 13: 36
              +8
              Yarbay - Colleague, this "message" is based on information from "Lenta.ru" is a well-known hotbed of liber @ static stuffing and trusting them is not respecting yourself.
              And yet, below Colleague, Fakturin wrote very correctly - Russia also refused to supply S-300 to Iran - as a result, the S-300 went to Venezuela - and it should happen, Venezuela resold them to Iran.
              1. Yarbay
                Yarbay 10 July 2012 13: 39
                +2
                Igor did not know about the tape !!
                As far as I know, the only copy of the S-300 was sold to Iran by Belarus, and the two S-300PMU2 divisions manufactured by Iran’s order were then sold to Azerbaijan!
                Apparently, about the Iran-Deza installation transferred by Venezuela !!
            3. spdm
              spdm 10 July 2012 15: 00
              +5
              Quote: Yarbay
              Today another message came that Russia was suspending the supply of Syrian weapons until the end of hostilities !!

              Dear Alibek!
              The secret is probably simple, who wants to lose money? Nobody wants a repeat of Libya at Rosoboronexport.
              Therefore, I think that a decision has been made in the political leadership of Russia. Assad can only find a suitable country, or he will share the fate of Gaddafi. There will be no mercy . In the Middle East, they shoot first, only then they say - oops, a mistake.
              1. Yarbay
                Yarbay 10 July 2012 15: 29
                +3
                alexander!
                It is likely even more than !!
                It just surprises me with the inconsistency of politics!
                Well, if you can’t, why oppose something to aggravate ??
                If you know you're losing, why play ??
                1. Odessa
                  Odessa 10 July 2012 15: 46
                  +3
                  Yarbay,
                  It just surprises me with the inconsistency of politics!

                  And where did you even see logic among politicians at politicians? Such a concept as logic is alien to them, especially here, in the Middle East, the main trump card is unpredictability, it is not for nothing that there is a saying - only God knows what will happen tomorrow!
                  1. Yarbay
                    Yarbay 10 July 2012 15: 51
                    +6
                    Esther is least interested in the politicians themselves!
                    It's just a pity for people!
                    With age I became very sentimental, I can’t calmly look at the suffering of the elderly, women, children without emotion !!
                  2. spdm
                    spdm 10 July 2012 15: 56
                    +4
                    Quote: Odessa
                    No wonder there is a saying - only one God knows what will happen tomorrow!

                    As well as everywhere
                2. spdm
                  spdm 10 July 2012 15: 53
                  +3
                  Quote: Yarbay
                  It just surprises me with the inconsistency of politics!

                  What many politicians would like to wish

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTjRC7aRuhE

                  Set real goals.
                  Or someone will gobble up all the cream for you laughing
      2. Facturin
        Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 41
        +7
        Quote: Steam Train
        the meaning of bargaining in Russia is to stop financing bandits

        Well, this meaning is more like nonsense ... the West does not seem to be financing the Caucasian terrorists either, but nevertheless the bandit’s money is not getting smaller.
    2. Cadet787
      Cadet787 10 July 2012 11: 22
      +5
      A sad article, it seems the amers threatened to Magnitsky’s list to freeze the assets of the Russian elite in banks. This is the logical conclusion.
      1. Irkit
        Irkit 10 July 2012 13: 27
        +1
        By the way, amers are directly threatening us and China. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zqu7UzHzz8
        1. Odessa
          Odessa 10 July 2012 13: 35
          +4
          Irkit,
          By the way, amers are directly threatening us and China.

          A threat is a reaction to fear or fear. So the amers are afraid of you!
          1. spdm
            spdm 10 July 2012 15: 58
            +2
            Quote: Odessa
            A threat is a reaction to fear or fear. So the amers are afraid of you!

            I agree, America is afraid of Russia.
      2. ytqnhfk
        ytqnhfk 10 July 2012 21: 37
        +1
        less grandmas will be kept there on our hands! otherwise grandmothers are used to getting out!
  7. Delink
    Delink 10 July 2012 08: 18
    +3
    Guys all good morning everyone!
    I support you all, they said correctly.
    Assad needs help now. And our eccentrics with the letter "M" ssat.
    They would show "Kuz'kina's mother"., You look and would calm down.
  8. badhoy
    badhoy 10 July 2012 08: 23
    +5
    Surrender to Syria-a spit in the face of Russia !!! The leadership of the Russian Federation stock up on scarves, wake up your face-wimps ....
  9. kuzmich
    kuzmich 10 July 2012 08: 46
    +3
    Well, who else but the Leontiev Jews should talk about this, an expert horseradish am
  10. nokki
    nokki 10 July 2012 08: 46
    +3
    TRex,
    It is the lack of political will that is the misfortune of modern Russian politicians. I don’t even want to think about betrayal, because then an analogy will have to be drawn with the betrayal of Christ by Judas! Not less! I don’t know what historical prototypes the current government has, but it looks like a Kerensky’s pro-Mason cabinet. What disaster this led to, we remember. If it were not for the will of Stalin, reinforced by the titanic efforts and sacrifices of the people, Russia could have been forgotten. What now? I’m just at a loss ... Some kind of Jewish puzzle!
  11. alexs30
    alexs30 10 July 2012 08: 47
    +2
    We are not talking about the physical protection of Syria. Our rulers would give her the opportunity to defend herself. And by canceling (or suspending, by the way, what is the difference) a previously signed contract for the S-300, we deprive them of the opportunity to at least somehow defend ourselves ......
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 10 July 2012 11: 04
      0
      Russia will not supply new types of weapons to Syria and conclude defense contracts with the country's leadership until the situation in the country stabilizes.

      According to RIA Novosti, on Monday, July 9, Vyacheslav Dzirkaln, deputy director of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSVTS), said.
      http://defence.az/news/a-1968.html
      1. Ataturk
        Ataturk 10 July 2012 11: 55
        +2
        Quote: Yarbay
        Russia will not supply new types of weapons to Syria and conclude defense contracts with the country's leadership until the situation in the country stabilizes.


        Hi brother. I have already said that the entire top in one boat and surrendered Syria.
        I just have a different question. WHAT'S NEXT?????????????????????????

        Why Syria? There is no such amount of oil to say that they are rich.
        Al Qaeda? Not! Al Qaeda is weak there, if any!
        What is the interest? Hit on an ally of Russia? I do not believe!!! Russia has the only ally - this is their own army. I was convinced of this. Although sometimes seeing how they supply the army, I doubt it. Hit Iran's ally? But is it not better to hit Iran and at the same time solve with 1 shot 2 birds with one stone?
        I think they know that too.

        So the conclusion is one. They want to dismember Syria. Rather, they will create Kurdistan. Each will receive its own piece. Or

        They will put their man at the head. In short, gahpyahana is the real one.
        1. Yarbay
          Yarbay 10 July 2012 12: 46
          +1
          Apparently the issue is not only in Syria!
          You're right!
          They want to redraw the map!
          I once wrote here that before the war in Iraq on one of the Turkish channels there was a speech by a retired Turkish general, he served in the center for strategic research!
          and he openly said that according to his observations and the available information, America would divide Iraq into three parts, Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish!
          Then the redistribution of the political map of the world begins !!
          what happens!
          1. Ataturk
            Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 53
            0
            Quote: Yarbay
            Then the redistribution of the political map of the world begins !!

            A lot of commoners will lie in coffins. Lots of!
  12. patriot2
    patriot2 10 July 2012 08: 50
    +4
    Unfortunately, the geopolitical position of Syria is such that having borders with: Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon and access to the Mediterranean Sea, real assistance can be provided either by sea, which is blocked by the AUG of the states, or by air corridors from Tehran. Since Iran, to put it mildly, "is not friendly" with the amers, then the cards are in their hands. We should think about real military assistance to Syria through third countries in all available ways: for example, Venezuela buys weapons and takes them to it by sea with a call to Syria. Think strategists, think and you will be lucky. And who said that volunteers, for example, from Belarus, very beloved by amers, would not want to come to Syria? Think gentlemen-comrades and negotiate with whom you need.
    1. vpm
      vpm 10 July 2012 14: 17
      0
      And I wonder what the Chinese think, they supported Russia's position on Syria, but what about jointly organizing support for the Syrian government? The Russians will produce weapons - the Chinese will finance, they will definitely have enough money. I know it sounds fantastic, but China must also understand that the games of the Americans in Eurasia will affect not only Russia, but also China and its ambitions, and simply on its internal security. If Russia has a painful point - separatism in the Caucasus, then in China - regional separatism in Xinjiang Uygur AR, which can also be financed from the same sources as the activities of "friends of Syria".
  13. NICK
    NICK 10 July 2012 09: 07
    0
    Syria will be drained slowly, even weapons are not sold after a shout from the Pentagon
  14. korvin1976
    korvin1976 10 July 2012 09: 16
    +2
    The article is really about nothing. As Leontiev himself says in his article: ".... talk about nothing."
    The whole article is nothing more than pouring from empty to empty. Personally, I treat Leontyev's opinion, mostly positively and respectfully, but here, I'm right in shock. It seems that he said something, but if you throw away everything superficial, the meaning behind what was said is not visible. More precisely, the meaning is there, but this meaning is akin to the studies of English "scientists": How does the population of hedgehogs living in Russia affect the mating games of goat-footed sheep in Peru?
  15. Spartak
    Spartak 10 July 2012 09: 30
    +3
    It is also not easy to kill all the bastard waging a war against your country with the participation of foreigners. We have been drinking in the Caucasus for a long time. Until the friends of these so-called "rebels" understand that we will not give Syria to be torn apart, nothing will change. And for this you need to show your fists. But will they show?
  16. Beck
    Beck 10 July 2012 09: 42
    -12
    Guys. Who are you protecting? Assad? Is he that democratically elected president? He received power from his father. All the elections held by him are elections as in the former USSR, 98% for the power of the Communists. Assad is a real dictator with, more or less, the guise of modern civilization. When did the people of Syria take up arms? Only after six months of peaceful demonstrations that Assad shot. Which people can bear more?
    Such a defense position may also cover Hitler. Wow, what Germans terrorists 21 times organized an attempt on Hitler, and he was friendly until 41. Or to complain that, in due time, the Haitian people had overthrown the dictator - Pope Duke.
    Of course, some extremist elements adapted to the rebellious people, but this always happens during times of turmoil. But such elements never have the potential for such proportions. What the people of Syria demand, only human rights and free elections. Assad knew and knows that any free elections will lead to his defeat. So he uses force. Like the dictator of Gaddafi. And why did you find this in, in recent times, in the Gaddafi of a civilized civilization, whose unloading exploded. The Libyan people also wanted free elections and he got them. And the first free elections in Libya have passed. If Assad, at the first mass demands of his people, held free elections, then of course he would have lost power. But that would be a million times better than today's massacre of their own people.
    1. Krilion
      Krilion 10 July 2012 10: 14
      +8
      Quote: Beck
      Guys. Who are you protecting? Assad?


      I didn’t guess ... they do not personally protect the Assad or Gaddafi ... ultimately they protect the remnants of international law so that in the future, including your representative, the uncle Sam’s representative would break into the house ...
      1. Amalek
        Amalek 12 July 2012 17: 23
        0
        Ahh .. used to when the occupier in their native language will understand the community, right? The elder Ohm in the gallery is a fiery convert.
    2. TRex
      TRex 10 July 2012 10: 17
      +7
      Along with the democratic elections, the people of Libya received a civil war, deprived of free education, medical care, guaranteed jobs and many other pleasant benefits that they used under the "dictator".
      Glorious democracy came and Iraq was hanged, Saddam was torn up ... Serbia was very democratically treated - how many thousands of tons of bombs were dropped on their heads?
      No need for airplanes ... production costs.

      Beck! You are a Cossack mishandled! Do you want to instill NATO democracy? He hid the pebbles in his bosom? "Guys. Who are you protecting?" Do you want to make another bonfire under the belly of Russia?
    3. Facturin
      Facturin 10 July 2012 11: 47
      +8
      Beck,
      Dictatorship is in America, where power has not changed for centuries! Only the avatars of the dummy "presidents" change, but neither the policy nor the way of action changes.
  17. Chemist
    Chemist 10 July 2012 10: 01
    -1
    TRex,

    I completely agree with you, political will is all. No wonder the Japanese in the recent past stated:
    The leadership of the Russian Federation lacks the political will to use nuclear weapons
    The population of Japan and the Russian Federation is Comparable (130ml - 140ml rough)
    You can start a war for the northern territories with the ensuing.
    I have no words.
  18. ShturmKGB
    ShturmKGB 10 July 2012 10: 09
    0
    It’s a pity that they began to retreat ... maybe a tactical maneuver? I want to believe that so.
  19. Krilion
    Krilion 10 July 2012 10: 11
    +6
    Mikhail Leontyev: “Russia currently does not have the resources to physically protect Syria”

    it certainly is so ... Russia will never have any resources, because they have long been handed over to all sorts of Friedman, Deripassi, Vekselbergs, Rotenbergs and others ... besides the complete Kremlin of traitors ...
  20. vladimir64ss
    vladimir64ss 10 July 2012 10: 18
    +2
    Syria can and must be saved. Russia has experience in overcoming such conflicts. And amers are already able to upset. Clintonsha spat on her image, tapping her tongue like the last messenger. Amers resource is also limited.
  21. Professor
    Professor 10 July 2012 10: 23
    +5
    It is clear that Assad will win any free election today.

    Not at all obvious. An example of this is Egypt ...
    1. spdm
      spdm 10 July 2012 16: 00
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      It is clear that Assad will win any free election today.
      Not at all obvious. An example of this is Egypt ...


      Absolutely not obvious. In the situation in Syria, the voices will be divided according to clans (religion) of the Alawites, nothing shines.
  22. igor_ua.
    igor_ua. 10 July 2012 10: 24
    +1
    Quote: Chemist
    No wonder the Japanese in the recent past stated:
    The leadership of the Russian Federation lacks the political will to use nuclear weapons

    Well, what kind of application of nuclear weapons can we talk about if money, real estate, and ELITE-RELATIVES OF THE ELITE IN THE WEST ?!
    1. volcano
      volcano 10 July 2012 10: 39
      +3
      Chemist
      This is when they announced? Who is it, but the Japanese? ..... Who have experienced what it is?
      Honestly hard to believe.
      And given our graters with them about the Kuril Islands ... They’re not afraid, declaring such that we will use them if necessary.
      Something like a desu. I'm sorry.
  23. Magadan
    Magadan 10 July 2012 10: 38
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    What is the problem? Here are the cheap Moscow - Damascus tickets. Go to the rescue of the Assad regime.
    Flights to Damascus (Syria) (495) 543-34-44

    It costs me 40 thousand to fly to Moscow. And I’d better give this money to the one who went through the Chechen war, it will be of more use to him.
    And thanks for the phone
  24. AIvanA
    AIvanA 10 July 2012 10: 38
    +1
    In this case, the author is very disingenuous, "Russia does not have the resources to physically protect Syria", which is probably why British pirates do not let ships with Russian weapons in, therefore they refuse very vital deals for the factories on the supply of weapons to Assad, this is nothing more than the fear of the owners that the Syrians can arrange their own no-fly zone, and is this not one of the types of Syrian defense, well, etc. In general, the author is disingenuous.
  25. itr
    itr 10 July 2012 10: 43
    0
    Why physically possible information. What do not say, and tyagomotina goes for a long time
  26. malera
    malera 10 July 2012 10: 44
    -2
    Quote: Magadan
    And the people of Syria, those who are for Assad, are sent food products using their registered grocery cards? And buy food from Russian agricultural producers on donations from Russians? Our people will not tolerate surrender to Syria !!!


    It’s good that you think about the Syrian Arabs.
    Maybe you will find time to think about the Russian people at your leisure.
    There are no basic accessories, gloves, boots, wheelbarrows in the Ministry of Emergencies.
    http://news.rambler.ru/14662904/
    There are no basic living conditions in the barracks. http://lifenews.ru/news/70779
    There are no basic medicines in hospitals - they say they bring them with you. I myself lay, I know.
    Anyone else you want to help, such as blacks in Africa?
  27. sapulid
    sapulid 10 July 2012 10: 45
    +1
    They attacked Michael well. This, his opinion and he, RIGHT to express him. This is not an axiom, therefore, there is debate here.

    So, can Russia confront the West at present? Probably, the threat of using nuclear weapons will cool down possible interventionists. But, obviously, no one but the opposition is at war. NATO will try to go there when the country is already covered in blood and the Syrians themselves will ask anyone who can, by any means, stop the war. What will our country look like in the eyes of the world community, hindering the establishment of peace? Have you calculated the consequences of possible isolation? Ah, dividends, interventions?

    In my opinion, the position of Russia is fully consistent with the moment. DECOMPOSE AND SECURE a probable enemy with the wrong hands, this is aerobatics! And the longer it goes on, the better for us, however blasphemous it may sound.
    1. badhoy
      badhoy 10 July 2012 10: 51
      0
      Here it is aerobatics !!!)

      http://vz.ru/news/2012/7/10/587746.html
  28. escobar
    escobar 10 July 2012 11: 26
    -1
    Russia, step by step, is slowly losing ground in Syria because Assad cannot resolve the internal conflict for a long time. I think Assad should think about a government in exile in the same Belarus. Perhaps the hour has not yet struck.
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 10 July 2012 11: 47
      +1
      Quote: escobar
      I think Assad should think about a government in exile in the same Belarus.

      If Assad is accepted as a person, then this is not a problem, especially as Assad did not seem to be tainted by terrible atrocities, but the government is in exile, I think that even Belarusi does not need such a crap.
      Honestly, at the expense of Yugoslavia, I understand and worried when the brotherly people were bombed, a single faith, a similar mentality.
      And Syria, some kind of toli Arabs toli Persians, tomorrow Assad will agree with the Americans and will be their best friend, and Russia will remain as it once was in Egypt. In place of diplomats, he can focus on Ukraine and try to work fruitfully, there may be great prospects for cooperation.
    2. Ataturk
      Ataturk 10 July 2012 11: 50
      -1
      Quote: escobar
      Russia, step by step, is slowly losing ground in Syria.

      Absolutely right! Already afraid to surrendered.
  29. Ataturk
    Ataturk 10 July 2012 11: 49
    +1
    Good afternoon friends.

    I once wrote about the fact that they handed over Syria, and I also said that we would soon find out what and how. Here I read today's news and was not surprised by God. Otmazyvatsya professionally.

    I still can not believe that some kind of Scotland coast guard stopped the Russian ship (FEAR LOST) with a ship of equipment for Syria.

    I have a couple of questions here. WHY IS THIS SHIP? From what time did they start to stop the Russian ships? KNOW THAT THE TECHNOLOGY IS THERE?! THEN THEN THESE THAT WESTERN AGENCY EXCELLENTLY WORKS IN RUSSIA WHAT? OR RUSSIA ALREADY DO NOT COUNT FOR POWER? I DO NOT BELIEVE!!!

    I think it was a setup. Do not be surprised if the ship was empty. Or to leave and save face as a reliable seller of weapons, they say I sent, the British are bad bastards, they detained the RUSSIAN SHIP, I repeat, RUSSIAN and not some kind of ZIMBABOU.

    So false. The guys surrendered a hundred pounds to Syria. It's just that the media feeds us with false information. Unfortunately I do not own such info about specials. of such contracts, but I immediately realized that the media hang noodles. They just take time to prepare and crush psychologically, maybe Assad will surrender or run away. In short, his book has already been written. It's a question of time. Bastards are preparing another war in Syria. This is a 100% very similar situation with Iraq. It was exactly the same. Once again I understand that my hopes are that the WEST and Russia and China and the entire world TOP are sailing in the same ship. It's a pity!!!



    EVERYTHING GOES TO ANARCHY AND APAKALIPS.
  30. apro
    apro 10 July 2012 12: 01
    -4
    Today, Russia has exchanged the remnants of Soviet dews for accounts in non-banks and for Amerian traders. The country’s strength and resources would be enough to protect both Libya and Syria to prevent pressure on Iran to speak and there is strength and will, but there is no will power our elite is dependent. And as for international law, it hasn’t been there since the betrayal of the USSR when there was a force balance to prevent any violation of these most international rights. Syria has only one way out to firmly crush the help of enemies to wait, in this sense, Russia is not an assistant.
    1. Ataturk
      Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 09
      0
      Quote: apro
      Today, Russia has exchanged the remnants of Soviet dear money for accounts in non-banks and for Amer’s traders. The country’s strength and resources would be enough to protect Libya and Syria to prevent pressure on Iran to speak and there is willpower, but there’s no willpower our top is dependent

      This suggests that Putin is at the head of Russia + for the United States.

      Quote: apro
      Syria has only one way out on its own to firmly crush the enemies of aid to wait for a lack of success in this sense, Russia is not an assistant.

      +1

      Only Syria has no scrap against another scrap. Alas
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 10 July 2012 12: 28
        +3
        Ataturk,
        Only Syria has no scrap against another scrap. Alas

        Support for Ahminejan, which for some reason does not moo, does not weigh in the direction of Assad. There is a crowbar, and quite weighty, only a snag in application ...
        1. Ataturk
          Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 37
          +1
          Quote: Odessa
          Support for Ahminejan, which for some reason does not moo

          zamochit then and for him quickly take up. That is silent!

          Quote: Odessa
          There is a crowbar, and quite weighty

          what scrap does Assad have? I didn’t understand something
          1. Odessa
            Odessa 10 July 2012 12: 41
            0
            Ataturk,
            zamochit then and for him quickly take up. That is silent!

            Who will take the USA? The hands of Israel?
            I didn’t understand something

            see photo what
            1. Ataturk
              Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 51
              0
              Quote: Odessa
              Who will take the USA? The hands of Israel?

              And here is Israel. Why Israel when there are ulcers like pen-dos, NATO, Britain, Canada and Australia.

              Quote: Odessa
              see photo

              Iran will not be able to save itself. I know a couple of people. They say food pipets became expensive, people steal food. No money left.
              That's horrible. So to call Iran a crowbar, well, I can’t honestly say that. With a stick, but not with a crowbar.

              I don’t feel special love for them, but they don’t act humanely. I feel sorry for the people. They have nothing to do with it, but alas, they are the first and in the answer.
              1. Odessa
                Odessa 10 July 2012 13: 08
                +4
                Ataturk,
                And here is Israel

                Yes, all the same ... Just a few months ago, the United States dragged some of the material for bombing Iranian nuclear reactors into Israel. Ahminejan was threatened, in return, to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
                Iran will not be able to save itself

                The United States writes scripts for all this mess, it doesn’t matter who, and it doesn’t matter where, it will be an ally. The state has a huge debt, and you can cover it only by earning oil, or start a war that will write everything off, at least they think so. This is what the state bloggers write about. I only read about it the other day.
                1. Armata
                  Armata 10 July 2012 13: 14
                  +4
                  Hi Esther.
                  Quote: Odessa
                  The state has a huge debt, and you can cover it only by earning oil, or start a war that will write everything off,
                  They think all the world's oil reserves are nonsense, their debt will not be written off, and the war will only be written off, not by debt, but by humanity from the face of the earth, and first of all.
                  1. Ataturk
                    Ataturk 10 July 2012 13: 26
                    +2
                    Quote: Steam Train
                    and the war will only write off not debt but humanity from the face of the earth, and in the first place.

                    right my friend.

                    plus every time they impose a war, it saves them from the crisis.
                  2. Odessa
                    Odessa 10 July 2012 13: 28
                    +4
                    Hello Steam Engine!
                    They think all the world's oil reserves are nonsense, their debt will not be written off, and the war will only be written off, not by debt, but by humanity from the face of the earth, and first of all.

                    Only when will it be?
                    Hilary (the mad duchess) pays visits to the countries where the US military contingent is deployed, a woman on a ship (or in politics) is in trouble, Obama has a `` headache '' about the election flight. Correctly Alibek said yesterday that autumn is not calm This rat fuss, in search of possible ways of enrichment for the United States, continues, they did not manage to let Syria through the Libyan scenario, etc.
                    1. Yarbay
                      Yarbay 10 July 2012 13: 47
                      +1
                      Dear friends!
                      The game is too serious now !!
                      Rather, a game of serious people (Rockefellers, Rothschilds, etc., etc.)!
                      This game will not allow misfires at this stage!
                      As long as everything is as they want, there is no alternative force !!
                      Then I am sure the Almighty as always will put the proud in their place!
                      1. Odessa
                        Odessa 10 July 2012 14: 59
                        +5
                        Yarbay,
                        Then I am sure the Almighty as always will put the proud in their place!

                        Alibek, I respect your religious feelings, but sometimes in life there are times when evil can only be stopped by force. As they say, hope in God, but don’t condone yourself! If everyone trusted in the Almighty, then humanity would not know the word war But the State Department, the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds are unfortunately not familiar with the basics of religion. They have their own religion of money, and their deity is the Golden idol, on whose altar whole nations are sacrificed.
                      2. Yarbay
                        Yarbay 10 July 2012 15: 11
                        +4
                        Esther, so am I about it !!
                        Just saying the Almighty, I do not mean that He will destroy everyone with thunder from heaven, although this is possible !!
                        I'm talking about the fact that sooner or later He will put them in place, maybe even with his hands
                        baby or the weakest army in the world !!
                        I assure you I have witnessed not small miracles!

                        recalled a parable about the prophet Moses * Once he saw a dead man in a very poor condition near the ditch and was surprised because he knew that person as a devout and God-fearing man! Then he entered the city and saw the magnificent funeral of the governor of the city known for his cruelty and immorality !! The Prophet Musa asked God why so ??
                        What God answered him, that the God-fearing one in life once turned to this ruler for help, and God does not like when those faithful to humiliate himself before the unworthy, and therefore he did not die very well, so that his sin would not be asked from him at the Court! of life, he did only one good deed, fulfilled the request of that person, and therefore God gave him a magnificent funeral, so that he would not ask for anything else at the Judgment! *
                      3. Odessa
                        Odessa 10 July 2012 15: 34
                        +3
                        Yarbay,
                        I assure you I have witnessed not small miracles!

                        I believe you, I once saw things that can not be explained by more than one logical explanation, then this is a miracle. An unexploded grenade in my hand, an unexploded ordnance that fell in a meter, a walk along a minefield is practically impossible, but nevertheless these are real stories .People in such cases of luck say that someone was born in a shirt, and someone in a vest, and someone in a bulletproof vest. bullyAnd believers say that God saves the safe.
                      4. Yarbay
                        Yarbay 10 July 2012 15: 57
                        +4
                        Designated +++++ good
                2. saturn.mmm
                  saturn.mmm 10 July 2012 16: 59
                  0
                  Quote: Odessa
                  The state has a huge debt

                  With the development of technologies and production in the eastern countries of the United States, it is more and more difficult to promote its products, competition is intensifying, debt is growing faster, no sane person believes that the United States will be able to stabilize the economy with this debt, even a local war will not help, it can aggravate the situation, terrorist activity aimed at oil production in the Middle East will affect the price, and when everything is settled in this region, God knows. So again Shakespeare "To be or not to be that is the question."
                  Probably in the Cold War as in nuclear, there will be no winners.
  31. vladeinord
    vladeinord 10 July 2012 12: 21
    -2
    Passed Assad and this is a fact !!!! Whoever the Arabs, Negroes, or Slavs are there, the fact of betrayal is obvious. So you look and merge us ..... WHAT TO DO ???
    1. antiaircrafter
      antiaircrafter 10 July 2012 12: 42
      -2
      Quote: vladeinord
      WHAT TO DO???

      Stock up salt, matches, kerosene. Plow the garden.
    2. Ataturk
      Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 47
      0
      Quote: vladeinord
      So you look and merge us ..... WHAT TO DO ???

      And they will merge. You think absolutely correctly. Everything goes to the fact that there will be 1 state in the world and all in slavery.
      Purpose?

      1. Reducing the world's population by at least half.
      2. There will be tops and there will be slaves.
      3. Have children, have something, all by permission of the above authority.

      I will not go far in my time in the 60s in Scandinavia .... when the physicians came across people with disabilities, those who were deprived of their minds, or with what types of illnesses, from a diabetes, FIG knows what you know what they did?

      THEY FORCEDLY STERILIZED WOMEN. In peacetime!
      Bill Heitz is doing the same thing in AFRICA now under the banner of help.

      Output? Yes no !!! The process is running. All who are not dictated by the West will be destroyed. Watch the programs of David Duke .... you will understand everything.
  32. sergo0000
    sergo0000 10 July 2012 12: 23
    +3
    Well, Leontiev sang the Syria's departure prayer! I didn’t expect from him, to be honest. As sometimes the leader of our country wants such a level as I.V. Stalin! A man who was on the side of the people in everything. And most importantly, the people trusted him in everything! It seems that our rulers already don’t trust the people. They will support one solution to any unpopular liberal decision on Syria and therefore try to please the masses and the West at the same time. It’s not surprising, however, when our media and the Internet are captured by enemies!
    1. Ataturk
      Ataturk 10 July 2012 12: 40
      +1
      Quote: sergo0000
      A man who was on the side of the people in everything

      Gold words.

      I’m afraid now who is at the head of any state, it doesn’t matter, they will either sail with the west or they will be overthrown.
      But modern politicians have snickered .... I don’t want to lose money and wealth.
      And Switzerland is ready to freeze accounts at any time.

      That's so
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 10 July 2012 13: 11
        +2
        Here, about Switzerland sent.
        Switzerland once again stated its disagreement with the oil embargo against Iran.
        Despite pressure from the US and the EU, the Swiss Ministry of Economy emphasized that it would not join the oil embargo against Iran.
        A spokeswoman for the Swiss Economy Headquarters Marie Ut, noting that many Swiss companies support the oil business with Iran, called on these companies to report their oil contracts with Iran to the country's headquarters.
        Switzerland also opposed the imposition of sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran, despite the fact that the Secretary of State of the State Department and the US ambassador in Switzerland have in recent months put different pressure on the Swiss government to join unilateral sanctions against Iran.
        The Swiss have the courage to show America a hand on the elbow, and the Zionist regime the middle finger. They wanted to spit on all sorts of pressure to please muddy personalities.
        1. Ataturk
          Ataturk 10 July 2012 13: 28
          0
          Quote: Odessa
          Switzerland once again stated its disagreement with the oil embargo against Iran.


          What do you think, if Switzerland says YES I WILL LIKE THE ACCOUNTS OF THE RICH IRANIANS, will it not be food for others to send their banks to hell?
          1. Odessa
            Odessa 10 July 2012 13: 40
            +2
            Ataturk,
            they will not be other food for the mind,

            Maybe it’s just not the banks to send, but the US banking system that is partially disabled. In principle (without knowing it), the Central Bank of Israel is engaged in this, buying up the falling dollar.
          2. Amalek
            Amalek 12 July 2012 17: 10
            -1
            What does the rich Iranians have to do with it?
            A little article putenoidnoy scum pushy-delusional passage. Well, nothing ... Soon, Qatar-Yamal and Puteyna will be kicked out of the Kremlin. The size of the value is only for the drunken sub-intake.
    2. sapulid
      sapulid 10 July 2012 19: 01
      +1
      Sergo, did you understand that you wrote about the Internet? :))) Unfortunately for you, on the Internet, there is no proper discipline, to which, you seem to be used to at the party meeting. Opinions are different and that’s good. This means that people are really free to express their opinions. You know, sometimes opponents may be right, however strange it sounds to you. No need to label anyone, please. Otherwise, you will have enemies who do not sing along to you. It seems that the country has already passed.
  33. KAZAKHSTAN
    KAZAKHSTAN 10 July 2012 12: 50
    -4
    Rave! who is leontiev ?! singer?! AMATEUR!!! non-panting article
  34. Brother Sarych
    Brother Sarych 10 July 2012 13: 43
    -1
    I think that this article by Leontyev is another signal of the gradual surrender of Syria - they say that I didn’t really want to contradict the USA and its allies ...
    Things are stagnating with the rebels and their patrons, so the Russian authorities thought, saying, are we really harnessed for Syria? What good will alter Assad opponents?
  35. sazhka0
    sazhka0 10 July 2012 14: 28
    -2
    The Greatest Country Run by Pu Has No Resources ??? Class. Have reached
  36. PARTISAN
    PARTISAN 10 July 2012 14: 34
    +2
    That's right, Igarr. + Big to you! You shouldn't draw such conclusions from his television platform. Take Iran, they were already at the first stage of the current exercises, practicing methods of struggle in a "psychological war." And if pessimistic forecasts start pouring out of the lips of the allies, then the morale will drop not only among the military, but indeed, among the entire Syrian people, and as stated in the article "the people will simply get tired."
  37. Mozart
    Mozart 10 July 2012 16: 41
    +1
    Russian Navy flotilla headed for Syria




    The large anti-submarine ship "Admiral Chabanenko" and three large landing ships left Severomorsk on a cruise to the Mediterranean Sea on Tuesday. According to Interfax, citing a military-diplomatic source, the Baltic Fleet patrol ship Yaroslav the Wise and ships of the auxiliary fleet will join the ships of the Northern Fleet in this voyage.

    In addition, according to Reuters, the Black Sea Fleet destroyer Smetlivy left Sevastopol for the eastern Mediterranean on the morning of July 10.

    The interlocutor of "Interfax" said that on board the ships of the Northern Fleet are marine units. It is expected that all ships going on the voyage will go to the logistics center in the port of Tartus.

    According to the source, the ships' voyage has nothing to do with the current crisis in Syria, but is being conducted "in accordance with the plans for the combat training of the Navy." In Tartus, the ships will replenish their supplies of fuel, food and fresh water.

    As expected, the ship’s voyage will take several months and will end by early October of this year.

    The characteristics of the BOD "Admiral Chabanenko" can be found in detail at this link, with the performance characteristics of "Yaroslav the Wise" - for this, a detailed story about the landing ship "Caesar Kunikov" - here.

    A month ago, NBC already announced the sending of Russian infantry to Syria, but then this information was not confirmed.

    http://www.lenta.ru/news/2012/07/10/destroyer/
  38. darkman70
    darkman70 10 July 2012 16: 44
    +1
    But Syria may not be surrendered. Since in this case, Russian business, for example Gazprom, may lose a lot of money. And grandmas are sacred for the modern Russian authorities.
    The second argument against the surrender of Syria: the people will not forgive Putin for the next surrender of our ally. Support rating, and now not very high, will fall below the plinth. And this is perfectly understood in the Kremlin.
    1. cool.cube2012
      cool.cube2012 11 July 2012 00: 56
      +2
      A quote from the article "How not to cry here?" http://www.zavtra.ru/content/view/kak-tut-ne-plakat/ Many have noticed that during a protocol visit to the so-called Western Wall in Jerusalem, President Putin behaved quite exaltedly: covering his face with his palm, he was heavy and sighed bitterly - people offer options for answers to this behavior of the commander.
      1. Amalek
        Amalek 12 July 2012 17: 13
        0
        And what is there to assume)))
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeFG2UZ2uMo
  39. wolverine7778
    wolverine7778 10 July 2012 16: 44
    +1
    In fact, Russia currently does not have such resources and weight to be able to physically protect Syria.
    Leoniev clearly said that Russia no longer wants to remain Assad’s defender when his power is already melting away by the day, and by the hour. At the same time, Assad can still count on the support of the army, but it is almost impossible to win the civil war. No.
  40. malera
    malera 10 July 2012 17: 28
    -3
    Quote: Odessa
    . The state has a huge debt, and you can cover it only by earning oil, or start a war that will write everything off, at least they think so.

    Woman, think with your brains and you will be happy. The US has debt in dollars. They will print as much as necessary, if necessary.
  41. AK-74-1
    AK-74-1 10 July 2012 17: 50
    0
    I read the opinion of Leontiev. But after watching HERE OF THIS PLOT, I personally have no doubts about Assad's victory.
    Who served check out the thug's treatment with a mortar:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdBqyG_3ww&feature=player_embedded
  42. sapulid
    sapulid 10 July 2012 18: 03
    +1
    Once again, I repeat, NOBODY IN THE WORLD sent troops to Syria! There is a quiet armament of the opposition. The fighting gives rise to bloodsheds and, thus, the conflict becomes protracted and insoluble for Assad. Sooner or later, the people will howl and pray for the one who will stop the massacre. (Up to this point, the conflict will be fueled by money and weapons, and by mercenaries, both the West and Alkaeda, Islamists, etc.) Against whom do you want Russia to deploy troops? In this Great Game, Assad’s position is unenviable. He kills the civilian population, in the eyes of the western man in the street. Help to the executioner threatens our country with international isolation. DO NOT HELP OPEN. THEREFORE, BOOTS WILL BE DEMANDED. It is in Russia's interests to bleed out a possible adversary without entering into a direct armed conflict. Yes, this is cynicism, but, politics is cynical, in fact. If you remain an important player by the time the conflict is resolved, then you can defend YOUR geopolitical interests in the region and gain weight in the Arab world, which the country began to lose by entering Afghanistan and which, finally, thanks .... Kozyrev-Yeltsin link.
  43. Oleg Rosskiyy
    Oleg Rosskiyy 10 July 2012 18: 11
    +1
    If there were a population in Syria, and, in principle, in modern Russia, with the same patriotic spirit as in the USSR in 1941, then the fight against militants would have ended long ago. Fighting terrorism is necessary for everyone, not just the regular army, so most to show the West about the unacceptability of imposing their demands. Our government suspends the sale of weapons to Syria, and who will be better off, because the states are just waiting for this, while they themselves continue to arm Alqaeda militants. The US intends to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, trained militants there, helped them establish drug trafficking, set them new tasks to change power in countries they did not like. Russia defends a sovereign state, because in the recent past it itself faced the same situation in the North Caucasus, and the West blamed us the same. With the fall of Syria, Iran, the next in line we, the fighters of Alkaida are already ready, other sabotage groups are being prepared in the Baltic countries, it remains only to say face, and what's next, we will also get tired and goon the occasion of these "peacekeepers"?
    1. sapulid
      sapulid 10 July 2012 19: 10
      -1
      Please specify what part of the population are you talking about? About convicts, of whom there was a sufficient part, about Crimean Tatars, about Chechens, about dispossessed people, etc.? Patriotism, oddly enough, was engendered by the victims of the civilian population and the atrocities of the fascists. "Hurray-patriotism" gave way to hatred. Only then, the enemy was beaten like a mad dog.
      1. Azalea
        Azalea 10 July 2012 23: 20
        +3
        My grandfathers both came to Berlin were patriots.
        When I was in Afghanistan, I was also a patriot. There was no hatred, and my grandfathers told this - We fought for the country, for its honor and freedom.
        What in the Second World War for life and in Afghanistan against the drug blockage of the country. Russians, Chechens, Tatars, Kazakhs, Yakuts, all peoples fought with honor then and now.
  44. Oleg U
    Oleg U 10 July 2012 20: 52
    -1
    From the words that we are not able to help Syria, I COME into a rage! PEOPLE! There is our base! Which for some reason is named a repair dock. With a hint that it is not so important and it is not scary to lose it. LORD YOUR GOD IS MY! What idiots in our government! And most likely traitors, by whom foreign accounts are more expensive than the interests of the state! There is only one conclusion from this, the sovereignty of the country is lost and only appearance is created so that the people do not rebel.
    1. Professor
      Professor 10 July 2012 21: 25
      0
      Which for some reason is named a repair dock.

      Because it's a repair dock, CEP. fellow
  45. Afftar
    Afftar 10 July 2012 22: 39
    +1
    The professor is a dumbass. You look at the flight dates on your tickets.
  46. Azalea
    Azalea 10 July 2012 23: 00
    +2
    Russia is a country of thieves.

    GLONASS was stolen, the routes for the summit were falling apart, the M7 highway was also eroded at the approaches to Moscow.

    Of course, these are elements of defense, the enemy will not pass, will not pass, and will not enter Glonass.

    And how to live like normal people, or will we always live in a state of war?
  47. Magadan
    Magadan 11 July 2012 00: 11
    +1
    Quote: malera
    Maybe you will find time to think about the Russian people at your leisure.

    The fate of the Russian people seek justice and protect the weak. Someone should do this and I am proud that our country has always done this. And the Lord is not indebted to such a people - therefore, we have such a large country and almost half of the planet's resources.
  48. 8 company
    8 company 11 July 2012 02: 13
    +1
    The second option is to let Assad kill the bastard who is waging war against his own country.

    It would be nice if someone had heard and implemented this wish in relation to the revolutionary terrorist rifle who waged a war against Russia in 1917.
  49. Magadan
    Magadan 11 July 2012 05: 02
    +1
    Quote: Company 8
    It would be nice if someone had heard and implemented this wish in relation to the revolutionary terrorist rifle who waged a war against Russia in 1917.

    I agree, only the train has already left. One can only hope that even though Lenin is finally removed from the main square of the country.
  50. Rodriques
    Rodriques 11 July 2012 12: 27
    0
    I don’t know, in my head there is no solution to this stalemate. And it is impossible to enter into an open military clash, and nothing can be done either. Maybe it is better to occupy all the strategically important former union republics, with the necessary resources, spit on the cries of the entire Western world, close all borders, all oil and gas pipelines and get on a military footing? And let the rest of the world marinate in their own shit. Let's see how long they last.
    Not really, of course, inspired. am
    1. Amalek
      Amalek 12 July 2012 17: 28
      0
      And will you eat in the process of your own kind? On the military rails.
      Let's see how long the erefia will last .. praying to the valve from which it drips less and less. But the scenario, in principle, is not bad .. those who voted for the Sun are worthy of Juche and pasture.