Technodynamics creates a parachute that helps to survive the splashdown

In Russia, work has begun on the creation of new parachute systems that will avoid the death of military personnel when splashed onto water. Research and development work is carried out by the Technodinamika holding (part of Rostec). This was reported by TASS with reference to the press service of the holding.

The Research Institute of Parachute Engineering, part of the Technodinamika holding, has begun development work on the creation of a new parachute, which will help to avoid the death of military personnel in the water. During the work that has begun, several solutions have already been proposed that allow you to quickly get rid of the suspension system and the canopy of the parachute when landing on the water surface. As one of such methods, the use of quick-release carbines is proposed. At the same time, in order to avoid involuntary opening by accidental pressing, they will receive additional locking devices.

One of them is quick-release locks on the free ends of the parachute system, which allow you to quickly be released from the parachute system, as well as quick-release carbines

- said the CEO of Technodynamics Igor Nasenkov.

Among other options that can save from death during splashdown, the inclusion of a special buoyancy element in the design of the parachute, which is automatically inflated when it enters the water, is considered.

The press service added that the rescue system during splashdown will be used not only on new, just created parachute systems, but the parachutes already used in the troops, including the D-10, will undergo appropriate modernization.

Earlier it was reported that the Research Institute of Parachute Engineering begins testing the new D-14 Shelest parachute, designed specifically for use with Ratnik equipment. The design of the D-14 "Rustle" allows fighters to engage in combat and fire from a regular infantry weaponswhile still in the air.

Comments

[Zeev Zeev]

Stop. But what, in Russian parachutes there is no quick unfastening of the dome and the suspension system?

[SERGEY SERGEEVICS]

Of course there is, very reliable and efficient .

[Zeev Zeev]

And what about quick-release locks like those on the T-10 or "Tsabar-3"?

[SERGEY SERGEEVICS]

If you started developing in this direction, then it is logical to assume that there isn’t.

[ltc35]

There were such parachutes in the Soviet army. Quick-detachable carbines are good, but when several unpleasant incidents occurred, they were quickly removed from service. I saw these, though I don’t remember the name of these systems. And best of all, an ordinary sling cutter!

[Doliva63]

Quote: ltc35

There were such parachutes in the Soviet army. Quick-detachable carbines are good, but when several unpleasant incidents occurred, they were quickly removed from service. I saw these, though I don’t remember the name of these systems. And best of all, an ordinary sling cutter!

What are quick-detachable carbines, explain, pliz.

[ltc35]

Not carbines. Locks on the outboard. They are necessary when landing in strong winds, when there is no way to quickly extinguish the dome.

[Doliva63]

Quote: ltc35

Not carbines. Locks on the outboard. They are necessary when landing in strong winds, when there is no way to quickly extinguish the dome.

Well, about the locks, I kind of know. Carbines surprised And yes, locks are needed not only in your case. However, judging by the chevron, you should know yourself

[Errr]

Maybe you should try artificial gills like Triton? They are very compact, they work in any water up to 45 minutes.Details can be found here:
https://mensby.com/technology/tech/6935-breathing-under-water-triton

[ltc35]

How much will the equipment cost? Do not hang on everyone.

[Errr]

Do not consider me a masochist, but feel free to minus me for the idea of ​​artificial lungs "Triton", which turned out to be well-promoted crap from South Korea on the Internet.))) But having an emergency device with you with a small supply of compressed air is not a delusional idea.) Such a system would very well complement a sling cutter.
I apologize to you personally and to the entire staff of VO for hastily promulgated misinformation.)

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

A quick locks like those on the T-10

But if the article read, then this question may not be asked

that the rescue system during splashdown will be used not only on new, just created parachute systems, but they will undergo corresponding modernization parachutes used in the military, including D-10.

[Motivatornick]

which locks. They die during exercises just because they didn’t unfasten and got confused, and there you just don’t have time to cut everything, you get entangled in these slings and sheets and you go to the bottom. Already, the paratroopers have drowned so many times.

[ltc35]

Yes, and with such castles flew to the ground at a time. It is unfastened too easily.

[Doliva63]

Quote: SERGEY SERGEEVICS

Of course there is, very reliable and efficient .

Well, the reliability here depends on the preparation - you have to figure out when it's time to cut , and this is experience. Although, of course, they teach this fairly, but someone immediately understood, someone only at the first refusal, for example I have just one after the army remained, in common parlance - "fish", but this is not an army sling cutter, but DOSAAF. The army was a nutcracker, a switch-out. But usually - either a bayonet-knife, or some kind of Finnish.

[UAZ 452]

If you remember, there were reports on the death of pilots colliding over the Tatar Strait SU-34. There, people died during the splashdown. There was also given a sequence of actions that the splashed one should perform in a matter of seconds. There is such a quest that it will take you an hour to remember, and to complete it in a stressful atmosphere, and even if at night, in difficult weather conditions, is simply unrealistic.

[Corn]

There are two combs of the dome from the suspension system, but they are used when landing on land is unsuccessful (for example, the wind pulls after landing and there is no way to extend the lower slings, to extinguish the dome), but not with splashdown.
Yes, and such sea troubles are not needed for paratroopers, in this case the simpler the better, the main thing is to observe at least basic safety precautions and everything will be fine, there is nothing to throw soldiers with a parachute anywhere from the seas, forests and high-voltage electric highways. But pilots can be equipped without problems with a parachute-wing (a river or a lake can be removed from under their feet) and an inflatable raft in case of splashing into the sea.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Corn

Yes, and these sea troubles do not need paratroopers,

Well, paratroopers are different. Marine too.

[Whowhy]

When I jumped on D-5 there were such castles. But on the cadet's parachutes, they were riveted, so to speak, "in order to avoid."

[Souchastnik]

They offer something similar. Quick release carbines, and so as not to accidentally open - lock.

[ltc35]

Taki there and not everyone in the park will tear back the lock. And if done easily, then there will be many falls. It is difficult to find a compromise in this matter.

[Whowhy]

So there they were with lock - it was necessary to pull first, and then press. Only cadets have playful pens (they say there were cases - they were detached at a fair height), so they riveted.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Stop. But what, in Russian parachutes there is no quick unfastening of the dome and the suspension system?

I found them in the army back in 81st. There were no D-type domes, but on all sorts of T-4, UT-15, etc. were. I will tell you more - even on domes with simple control of "rolls" the fighters have always countered these "rolls", because they will foolishly fly away anywhere or nakuralesit in the air. And so, everything was invented a long time ago and where it should be applied.

[Pedrodepackes]

In Russia, work has begun on the creation of new parachute systems that will avoid the death of military personnel when splashed onto water.

it was high time, since the incident in childhood, the pilots were taken to the Volga during training jumps, they were drowning in front of everyone, the fishermen thought that they worked out the salvation of the pilots who had splashed down and thought for a long time while they sailed and there was no one else, and how many more such cases were. ..

[rotmistr60]

One of them is quick release couplings on the free ends of the parachute system, which allow you to quickly be released from the parachute system

On parachutes PTL, "Lesnik", with which we had to jump such locks are available. Trainings on uncoupling from the parachute during splashdown were carried out several times. In addition, training was conducted on partial release from the harness in the air before water landing. But to be honest, the most unpleasant moment comes when you understand that splashdown on a pond cannot be avoided.

[KVU-NSVD]

Better and quick-release, and self-inflating device on the newly developed, and on older systems, equipment with inflatable devices. Or it’s simpler - to create a life jacket that can keep a soldier in gear - to buy a certain number of such vests will be cheaper cheaper than to make smart with the proven systems of existing parachutes. Issue such vests when landing in places with a large number of ponds. In addition, there are even armor plates with buoyancy elements, but it’s hardly realistic to equip the entire airborne personnel with such

[Izotovp]

The floating armored armor is also a good thing. And after landing, it’s not a fact that you won’t have to force the water barrier. But to connect a life jacket with a parachute is an interesting idea.

[Pedrodepackes]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Better and quick-release, and self-inflating device on the newly developed, and on older systems, equipment with inflatable devices. Or it’s simpler - to create a life jacket that can keep a soldier in gear - to purchase a certain number of such vests will be cheaper more reliable

my thoughts are my horses)))) here after all, what’s the matter, putting a life jacket on a prohibitively loaded paratrooper is almost impossible, how to put it on top of or under the equipment? In both cases, problems. And it’s not a matter of buoyancy, or rather, not only in it, the canopy with slings in the water is swaddled so that you won’t get out, that’s why they drown.

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Issue such vests when landing in places with a large number of ponds

But how about the pilots? They fly everywhere and where it is necessary to catapult is unknown. I think:

the inclusion in the design of the parachute of a special buoyancy element, which is automatically inflated when it enters the water.

the best option, as well as quick couplings

[Doliva63]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Better and quick-release, and self-inflating device on the newly developed, and on older systems, equipment with inflatable devices. Or it’s simpler - to create a life jacket that can keep a soldier in gear - to buy a certain number of such vests will be cheaper cheaper than to make smart with the proven systems of existing parachutes. Issue such vests when landing in places with a large number of ponds. In addition, there are even armor plates with buoyancy elements, but it’s hardly realistic to equip the entire airborne personnel with such

I'm not aware of the armor with buoyancy elements, but back in the 70s, the flyers had 2 "packages" on the harness, and upon splashdown - 2 floating buoys with the "muzzle" up. Everything was invented long ago.

[UAZ 452]

Thank God! And then the statistics of deaths during splashed water is such that in the place of pilots in the event of an accident over the water you will think three times - are there any more chances if you do not catapult.

[Izotovp]

In airplanes, it’s time to make floating cockpit-capsules, which take off from the airplane and take the pilot out of the affected area.

[UAZ 452]

As in passenger aircraft - for the entire passenger cabin and cockpit. But apparently, while it is cheaper to pay insurance periodically to relatives.

[Izotovp]

There were such mock projects. With the separation of the passenger compartment into segments, in my opinion.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Izotovp

There were such mock projects. With the separation of the passenger compartment into segments, in my opinion.

Even in "The Adventures of Captain Vrungel" is described.

[NN52]

Something I don’t understand what they are discussing here .... The flight crew has a raft and there is a TSA 74. They fly with it ..
Everything for pilots was invented for a long time.
Well, paratroopers must also issue the same ASP 74.

[Piramidon]

Quote: NN52

Something I don’t understand what they are discussing here .... The flight crew has a raft and there is a TSA 74. They fly with it ..
Everything for pilots was invented for a long time.
Well, paratroopers must also issue the same ASP 74.

Have you ever tried to climb into LAS-1 even naked and in warm Black Sea water, not to mention the fur suit and in the water of the Barents Sea with a temperature of +4 degrees

[NN52]

Have you ever tried to get into PSN 1 in Agoy, or Khabarovsk?
And where did you climb the boat in a fur jumpsuit?
Navy is not fate?
Do not write nonsense .... There was a better opinion about you, make a mistake ...
And you didn’t fly ... Technician?

[Piramidon]

Quote: NN52

Have you ever tried to get into PSN 1 in Agoy, or Khabarovsk?
And where did you climb the boat in a fur jumpsuit?
Navy is not fate?
Do not write nonsense .... There was a better opinion about you, make a mistake ...
And you didn’t fly ... Technician?

First, I didn’t drink at the Brudershaft, and did not give me reason to be rude.
Second, our crews did not fly to MSC. Go to the forum of the Kipelovo Air Base website. There are a lot of photos of the crews before departure. Find at least one person there in the MSC.
Here's the first one. Pre-flight directions.

[NN52]

So .. first .. Stepan ... about to be rude, about the naked look you started, this time!
About the Barents Sea? Or didn’t you bend the Tatar Strait?
And you have not beguiled, pre-flight directions, with the departure of the crew ???? When do they change clothes in the air-force complex ???? Stepan ... if you don’t remember something, or don’t know, then there’s nothing to talk about it ....
And not MSC, but VMSK ... and everyone flew in IT .... Styopa ...
And I’m not just going to a brooder with you, but I won’t just drink, after such statements ...
Although the tech guys were normal guys ... but it's not about YOU.

[Piramidon]

Quote: NN52

And you have not beguiled, pre-flight directions, with the departure of the crew ???? When do they change clothes in the air-force complex ????

Here in this photo the commander gives instructions to his crew just before departure. Is this not pre-flight instructions, "normal child"? I don't know where they change their clothes in those parts where MSCs are used, tk. we didn’t use them, but I don’t think they were under the plane just before departure. The ventilation system for the suits of the MSC and the MSC, and not the Navy, was on the plane. Dmitry, if you did not serve in those days, then you do not need to pretend to be an aviation expert of all times and peoples.
What did you see rudeness on my part when I asked about LAS-1? But you began to poke me and accuse of delirium. All if there is a desire to continue to sculpt groundless accusations, then only in PM.

[NN52]

These are not pre-flight directions.
Pre-flight directions are conducted for flying crews in the pre-flight direction class, after airborne weather reconnaissance, with a report from all services, and in particular about the actual weather in the flight area from the weather reconnaissance crew.
Crews during flights, both before, during, and after, are in ZVS. What are you writing about? Stepan? The fact that you were at IPU or at the central heating center?
And Stepan ... you don’t understand what you are writing about ... about MSCs and Navy .......

[bogart047]

after so many dead, they finally decided ...

[Vadim02rus]

when splashed to water

I did not know that "splashdown" happens somewhere else.

[Denimax]

In any case you need a boat, you can’t go far in full gear. An automatic parachute reset cannot be invented ?! Like a cord with a load, when in contact with water, the cord tension will loosen and the reset lock will work. Only the button will need to be activated if I am sure that you are being reduced.

[Romanenko]

As far as I remember, quick-release locks were on all domes, at least starting from the D-5 Series 2, on the D-6 there were still half rings to add additional sliding to the dome when maneuvering was necessary. However, practically everywhere these systems were monitored by PDS officers "in order to avoid ..."

[Nikolaevich I]

Technodynamics creates a parachute that helps to survive the splashdown ...

If the first time did not work, then parachuting is not for you!
And finally ... you need a parachute!

[Svyatoslav Palchikov]

Why not just close up the water-controlled and automatic pyrataprons? In my opinion it is very simple.

[Ros 56]

To do this, hell knows when OSK locks were invented. I don’t know what and how it went further, sort of expensive.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Ros 56

To do this, hell knows when OSK locks were invented. I don’t know what and how it went further, sort of expensive.

This is where the center key is up, and then press 2 keys on the sides? What is there something expensive ?! Just nobody cares. Now there are no Margelovs.

[APASUS]

And what else needs to be invented?

ASP-74V aviation rescue belt. It is necessary if the pilot has to leave the plane above the sea. On the sides you can see the blue "floats" (buoyancy chambers) - they help the pilot to stay on the water. The chambers are filled with carbon dioxide from cartridges, the gas filling system is switched on manually, it is possible to blow through the mouth through special valves.

[Doliva63]

For the most stupid, you need a parachute with locks that will work when the probe touches the surface that way at 5 meters. Nothing else will help.

[Ros 56]

Dumb is better to planes and parachutes closer than a kilometer to keep out. More likely to stay alive.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Ros 56

Dumb is better to planes and parachutes closer than a kilometer to keep out. More likely to stay alive.

That is true, but someone must serve in the army!
Joke. In fact, the trouble is not in parachutes, but in people and their training. When I was taught, the matbase was huge, and the approach was really individual. When I was teaching, everything was already simpler - the base is primitive, there are less hours on the VDP. But even though they didn’t fight, they didn’t sink and didn’t burn on the wires. How right there with that, I don’t know.

[Ros 56]

But in any way, we had an ASK, every year 400 people were trained for the airborne forces plus athletes: both paratroopers and pilots and modellers. And now something is moving nominally there, but no flights, no jumps, no equipment, no team, no salary. In short, a half-corpse with no prospects if the state does not change its mind.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Motivatornick

which locks. They die during exercises just because they didn’t unfasten and got confused, and there you just don’t have time to cut everything, you get entangled in these slings and sheets and you go to the bottom. Already, the paratroopers have drowned so many times.

Such locks! To unfasten the suspension before splashing is longer than opening 2 locks. I don’t remember a single instance when a parachutist with dips on castles drowned. Do you make conclusions?

[Doliva63]

Quote: APASUS

And what else needs to be invented?

ASP-74V aviation rescue belt. It is necessary if the pilot has to leave the plane above the sea. On the sides you can see the blue "floats" (buoyancy chambers) - they help the pilot to stay on the water. The chambers are filled with carbon dioxide from cartridges, the gas filling system is switched on manually, it is possible to blow through the mouth through special valves.

Invented in the 74th of the last century.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Ros 56

But in any way, we had an ASK, every year 400 people were trained for the airborne forces plus athletes: both paratroopers and pilots and modellers. And now something is moving nominally there, but no flights, no jumps, no equipment, no team, no salary. In short, a half-corpse with no prospects if the state does not change its mind.

Clear. Sad, what.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Romanenko

As far as I remember, quick-release locks were on all domes, at least starting from the D-5 Series 2, on the D-6 there were still half rings to add additional sliding to the dome when maneuvering was necessary. However, practically everywhere these systems were monitored by PDS officers "in order to avoid ..."

I think I know why you have 2 minuses:
1. "Rolls" on the D-6 are "countered" by definition. To "unlock", you just need to pull out the locking cord. Another thing is that the personnel were forbidden to do this, and warrant officers and officers sometimes used this device without problems. Although there is a nuance - in several parts I saw PROTECTED "rifts", but I was told that these came from the factory.
2. There are no PDS nicknames in the Airborne Forces; they are in the Air Force. And in the Airborne Forces called GVA nicknames. In any case, it was like that when he served in the Airborne Forces and Airborne Forces.