Space nuclear tug. TEM on MAX-2019

40
In our country, the development of the transport and energy module of the TEM with the megawatt-class nuclear propulsion system (YEDU) continues. The appearance of such a model suitable for operation will have a serious impact on the further development of domestic and world space exploration. In the meantime, TEM is at the design stage, and recently the public again showed the layout of such a product in its current form.


New TEM layout at MAX-2019. RIA Photo News / ria.ru




Exhibit MAX-2019


In recent years, various materials on TEM and NEDU for him have been repeatedly published. Among other things, the developers showed drawings with the possible appearance of such a sample. In late August, the first demonstration of the new TEM prototype, reflecting current views on this project, was held as part of the MAKS-2019 salon. The model was present in the Roscosmos pavilion at the Arsenal Design Bureau stand.

The current version of the appearance of TEM is markedly different from the previously demonstrated versions, but retains certain of their features. In particular, the general provisions of the assembly layout and design approaches have been retained. There are a number of characteristic differences.

The largest element of the breadboard module is a telescopic four-section round-section truss, which is the basis for the assembly of units. Its head part is equipped with a conical truss and a closed compartment. On the sides of the farm are fixed six panels of the cooling system. The tail compartment of the TEM is made in the form of a closed rectangular housing. The main farm is fixed on it in front, solar panels are on the sides. A new type of rocket engine and other units are placed in the body.

New and old


Earlier in the publications on the topic of TEM and YaEDU, images with a technique of a different appearance appeared. According to one of the later versions of the project, the transport and energy module should be based on a longitudinal sliding truss of square section and large elongation, which facilitates the launch of the product into orbit. In its head part, a compartment with a reactor is placed; in the tail part, an electric rocket engine and other systems located on the disclosed supports. Along the supporting farm it was planned to place cooling equipment.

The layout from Arsenal Design Bureau has a number of characteristic features and differs from older images. First of all, it is distinguished by the design of the main farm and the layout of the units. The new TEM version is characterized by a more massive carrier farm of a different design. He also lost the X-shaped tail beams, revealed in flight and carrying part of the instruments.

Layout design allows for a layout change. Perhaps now a large tail housing accommodates not only an electric rocket engine, but also a nuclear reactor with associated systems. In this case, the smaller head housing can be used to accommodate control systems or other equipment.

Different designs previously featured differing cooling system configurations. The same applies to the new layout. This time, it is proposed to use six emitter panels installed along the truss in the form of three parallel “planes” to radiate excess heat into space. Other cooler configurations were previously proposed, including aggregates of a larger area, occupying almost the entire length of the supporting truss.

In November last year, the Roskosmos television studio published a video showing the possible look of the future TEM with nuclear power plants. This version of the module was very different from those shown earlier. While maintaining a linear architecture based on a sliding truss, such a TEM had to have tail units made in the form of an open cylinder. In this form, it was necessary to perform a power plant, cooling, etc.

Space nuclear tug. TEM on MAX-2019
An early version of the TEM layout. Figure RSC Energia / kosmolenta.com


It is easy to see that the current TEM layout differs from the “last year” version of the look. Moreover, in its appearance and design, it is much closer to earlier versions of the project.

Technical tasks


The TEM project is of the highest technical complexity and for its successful implementation it is necessary to solve a lot of special problems. To create such a module, new designs of units and assemblies, new technologies and materials with special characteristics are needed. The need to solve all these problems has led to the development of nuclear power plants and TEMs carried out by a number of enterprises from Roskosmos and Rosatom.

At different times in the published materials there were different versions of TEM, and the reason for this can be considered precisely the overall complexity of the project. Success in finding solutions to various problems led to corresponding changes in the overall appearance of the module. Accordingly, the latest TEM model from Arsenal Design Bureau shows current views on the project.

According to well-known data, a gas-cooled fast neutron reactor was chosen as the basis for nuclear power generation. The helium-xenon mixture will be used in the primary circuit of the cooling system. Fuel with a high degree of enrichment will be placed in the active zone. The core temperature will reach 1500 ° K. It is planned to provide the highest resource of design, allowing to operate TEM during 10-12 years.

Nuclear power plants of this kind and with such characteristics have not yet been created and operated. For the construction of such a design, materials with high resistance to thermal and mechanical loads are required. It is also necessary to work out the design itself, so that at the required power it would have acceptable dimensions and weight.

There are difficulties in the field of cooling systems. A megawatt-class NEDF should dissipate comparable volumes of thermal energy into space. Modern radiators for space technology can not yet boast of such characteristics. So, the ISS cooling system throws into space approx. 70 kW of thermal energy is many times less than that required for nuclear power plants and TEM.

Various versions of coolers for TEM are being developed, which is reflected in the figures and during the assembly of models. Apparently, the set of flat radiators on the layout from Arsenal is currently considered the most profitable design with optimal characteristics. However, it is quite possible that this system will not be the final option.

Despite all the difficulties, significant success has been achieved in the framework of the TEM project. So, several years ago, tests began on the ID-500 electric rocket engine, created specifically for the future nuclear power plant. In 2017, such a product worked at the 300 watch stand, showing the power of 35 kW.


TEM sample of 2018. Frame from the video studio "Roscosmos"


The assembly and testing of the individual components of the nuclear power system and TEM are regularly carried out. For example, last year we tested a prototype of a drip cooling system. Other components of the reactor, auxiliary systems, and the transport and energy module as a whole are being developed.

Transport of the distant future


The purpose of the current projects of nuclear power and nuclear power engineering and TEM is to create a promising complex that can provide a solution to new problems in outer space. The transport and energy module with a reactor and an electric rocket engine will have important advantages over missile systems of traditional designs and will successfully organize new missions.

The main field of application of TEM is considered to be flights to other celestial bodies. NEDU shows the highest fuel efficiency and has a unique specific impulse, which simplifies flights to the Moon or Mars. There is also the opportunity to increase the payload compared to current space systems. An important feature of TEM is the possibility of power supply of the load due to the standard means of the module.

However, obtaining such results is possible only in the distant future. According to current plans, flight tests of TEMs in full package will begin no earlier than the end of the twenties. Launching the operation and bringing the module to real work is possible only in the early thirties.

Work on the TEM will continue for several years, and during this time the project may undergo noticeable changes. In this regard, we can assume that the layout of the module for MAX-2019 will soon cease to reflect the real appearance of the product being created. However, a change in views on the structure and its elements will lead to the appearance of new demonstration materials - already at the next exhibitions.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    6 September 2019 05: 29
    Said famously, there will be no good. Of the models that we demonstrate at the exhibitions, it is easy to build a space fleet. The other thing is that we really started to bring it to life. ..
    1. +6
      6 September 2019 06: 35
      Quote: Thrifty
      The other thing is that we really started to bring it to life. ..

      An electric rocket engine with a power of 40 kW was tested. I saw it with my own eyes. In that very Moscow. MAI. Impressive. The resource is really 300 hours. "Grids" are triggered by accelerating ones. There is a selection of materials and design improvement. Apparently, other people are working on the nuclear reactor.
      1. -2
        6 September 2019 11: 00
        300 hours for erd is not enough
        For example, the existing Russian SPD-100 has a resource of 7500 hours.
        A tugboat needs a minimum of 20 thousand
        1. +1
          6 September 2019 13: 07
          Quote: BlackMokona
          For example, the existing Russian SPD-100 has a resource of 7500 hours.

          Only the power is different. Absolutely. This engine at a power of 1 kW will also work 15000 hours!
          1. -1
            6 September 2019 13: 40
            So the engine is much larger and heavier. Immediately 100 kilowatts are pumped not into the SPD-40. The most important thing is that with 300 hours, the project can generally be closed. Who will change the engines after each operation to move the orbit? Here either an ordinal buildup, or there is no sense in the project
      2. -6
        6 September 2019 13: 03
        Everything that "Ryabov Kirill" writes should be either critically assessed, or, if lazy, divided by at least 10, or even by 100. It's not just that this sandpiper praises his swamp, although he praises it stupidly and clumsy. On this topic. With these nuclear "Poseidons", "Petrel", "Lomonosov" everyone went crazy or something? Even in the "great and indestructible" USSR, after the fall of a satellite with a nuclear power plant in Canada and Chernobyl, they were very careful about nuclear power. The projects of torpedoes, aircraft and nuclear-powered missiles were abandoned even earlier, at a time when Sakharov was engaged in "superbombs" and the like, and not "in the fight for peace." Moreover, they refused almost simultaneously in the USSR and in the USA. What changed? Has the half-life of uranium or plutonium been reduced to days? Radioactive cesium, iodine and other elements have become useful for humans? The need for biological protection has disappeared, alpha, beta and gamma radiation "strengthens the tan"? In fact, they impose on us (specifically, they do not offer) FOR OUR MONEY (taxes) to make hundreds of devices (ammunition units, unmanned aerial vehicles, etc.), which, even without SBS, are EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, and in the case of application (testing, exercises), it is unambiguous "dirty". A nuclear engine in space is the safest of all of the above, although in a set with Roskosmos, Rogozin and a drill it can surpass Fukushima and Chernobyl taken together.
        1. +2
          6 September 2019 15: 52
          Why fly to other planets? hi give everything to pensioners ... bully
          1. -2
            6 September 2019 16: 24
            Not all. We’ll leave the drill, and then there’s nothing to blame, why it didn’t reach other planets. Yes, and I would like to objection to the point. Or will we wait for another explosion near Nenoksa?
            1. +5
              6 September 2019 18: 33
              Quote: samaravega
              Yes, and I would like objections on the merits

              all the objections in the article - to fly even to Mars on chemical fuel is utopia, but with such a tugboat - completely! hi And not three years, but three months ... request As for danger - until the reactor was turned on - there is only fuel - fresh uranium, it is not dangerous ...
        2. 0
          26 November 2019 20: 14
          There are no prospects without nuclear power plants in large space. Most long-term satellites have atomic electric-thermal modules. You can't even imagine how many radioactive materials are flying over our heads, and for quite a long time. Development of nuclear power plants for aircraft, cruise missiles, torpedoes. were carried out until the range of ballistic missiles made it possible to guarantee to reach the enemy. As soon as it became possible, the projects were frozen. With the appearance of the "partners" of missile defense systems, the topic of guaranteed defeat became relevant again and dust was blown off the projects. Poseidon and Petrel, political weapons intimidation and vryatli will be produced in a significant amount. This is like at one time with "Tsar Bomba" and the charge of the same Poseidon is comparable in power to it. Then one demonstration was enough to seat the United States at the negotiating table, now it will be the same. reactor for a tug, new developments are always needed at least in terms of R&D, while it is absolutely not important from what year itself to concept of ideas and whether they will be embodied in metal.
          1. 0
            3 December 2019 17: 34
            On radioactive materials over our head, can you specifically? With the indication of the satellite, the country of the owner, the date of launch, the date of termination of operation with an explanation, where did the satellite go, roughly "burial orbit" or "dense layers"? On all the satellites of the USSR with nuclear power plants on board, information is not even in the "internet", but in official books. Anything to add specifically? Or blah blah blah again?
            1. -1
              5 December 2019 12: 20
              If you are aware of the USSR satellites, military serials "Kosmos", then what kind of blah-blah-blah are you planting? What is the burial orbit also in the know, or why is only a part of space debris burned in the atmosphere and drowned?
    2. -1
      8 September 2019 21: 24
      Quote: Thrifty
      The other thing is that we really started to bring it to life. ..

      Like what? Initially, it was supposed to build a flight prototype in 2022 - 2023 (google "Transport and energy module of a megawatt class). The dates are shifted at a rate of one and a half years in a year. We have already reached the end of the thirties - but the reports are becoming more cheerful, and Mr. Rogozin - Everything is more optimistic. Guess when all this will end? I suggest: never. And they probably began to implement it, according to our old custom.
  2. 0
    6 September 2019 05: 53
    There is a good prototype. Nostromo.
    1. +6
      6 September 2019 09: 33
      Nah, there everybody runs on the ceiling.
  3. +4
    6 September 2019 06: 14
    Let us announce a competition among the readers of VO for the best drawing of a model of a space nuclear tug. Prize - the opportunity to use foul language addressed to Roscosmos. wassat
    1. +15
      6 September 2019 06: 38
      Let us announce a competition among the readers of VO for the best drawing of a model of a space nuclear tug. Prize - the opportunity to use foul language addressed to Roscosmos

      It would be better to announce a test task who will last longer without stupid comments on VO. I think this is a much more difficult task and most of the local "experts" will not even pass the qualifiers laughing
      1. +5
        6 September 2019 10: 27
        I fully support it, because this nonsense is already impossible to read and smart comments among it are lost !!!
        1. +1
          6 September 2019 13: 59
          I fully support it, because this nonsense is already impossible to read and smart comments among it are lost !!!

          So write something clever about the layout and picture. I enjoy reading. recourse
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. AAK
    +2
    6 September 2019 09: 30
    Looking at the extreme image it is not clear, "Roscosmos" stole the idea from "Avatar" or "Avatar" from "Roscosmos" ... :)))
    1. +1
      6 September 2019 22: 58
      Cameron for Avatar himself stole the idea from Karl Sagan.
  6. Hog
    -3
    6 September 2019 10: 40
    Well, another 50 billion will be requested for it, and then it turns out that they could not be created, but the budget funds were fully utilized)))
    1. +4
      6 September 2019 13: 00
      Do you think you don’t have to do anything?
      1. Hog
        -4
        6 September 2019 15: 37
        You just have to do it, but by what’s going on in Roskosmos, business is not visible.
    2. +1
      6 September 2019 15: 53
      Quote: Hog
      Well, another 50 billion will be requested

      let money rot better in gold reserves? bully
      1. Hog
        -2
        6 September 2019 17: 15
        let money rot better in gold reserves?

        That's right, why goodness disappears in vain, maybe someone will buy a yacht or something else.
    3. vka
      +1
      6 September 2019 20: 35
      and new technologies, materials, etc. are what we don’t need
      1. Hog
        -4
        6 September 2019 20: 54
        technologies, materials

        But what does Roskosmos have to do with it?
  7. +4
    6 September 2019 21: 45
    First, a little about the comments on VO:
    Recently, the quality of comments has dropped so dramatically that it's just disgusting to read. Previously, the discussions were more detailed. And now "Ug, they will be stolen, Rogozin down, bugaag ugaga" And so on.
    As if they form the image "Roskosmos is evil, Rogozin is the leader of evil." And the problem is not that they may be partly right. And the fact is that the slogans are only about the fact that they are not partly right, but completely and unconditionally !! As if there is no other opinion and judgment.
    Either they don’t see from their blindness, or they don’t want to, they only see the bad, they remember only the bad, they begin to believe in their own lies and carry nonsense.
    It's disgusting to read such! And believe me, when I read sound criticism with details and arguments, I always accept it. But idle talk and "bugaga", it's not here, please!

    And according to the articleI am delighted to follow the changes in this project. The project can be said to be significant. Many have already been launched into space, but the road to remote parts of space is inaccessible to us, without decent power.
    This installation is only the beginning, but the most important step. Only such engines and power will allow us to master in space, not only as a guest for a couple of days. If on Earth we can get liquid fuel in many places. Logistics already allows us to do this. But in space, fuel delivery alone will cost several times more. And there only compact energy sources are possible. In the meantime, only nuclear fuel.
    And this is, after all, probably an obvious step, an obvious step in the development of space exploration (and even space exploration), it is obvious that it is necessary, but all development in capacities rested against the wall, and barely moves. Like an obvious step, they do not want to see or walk.
    In this regard, the fact that such a project is developing in Russia gives our country very great prospects for development and earnings. I'm not talking about technological solutions, which can also be very interesting on Earth. It is in our country that nuclear energy is developing very well. And perhaps it is Russia and lead such a project. Give a new leap in development for space exploration!
    Yes, there were problems and the fall of radioactive parts to Canada, this is not something to brag about. However, unfortunately, not without experience in errors. I think those mistakes were largely due to rush. In any case, it is precisely in this sense of experience that we have a lot more experience, to whom, no matter how we bring it to mind!
    1. 0
      8 September 2019 22: 01
      But is this thing necessary at all? Let's count.
      The mass of figs is 20,3 tons, but this is without load. Suppose she carries a spacecraft weighing 3 tons, this is not very much. For manned long-range expeditions, more is needed, to Mars, say - at least 30 tons. Total minimum weight - 23 tons. With a thrust of 18 N, we obtain an acceleration in zero gravity of less than 0,783 mm / s / s. Is it a lot or a little? In a day, the speed will increase by 67,62 m / s, in a month it will reach 2 km / s - this is when moving in deep space. And when starting from near-Earth orbit, the traction force will not only perform work to increase kinetic energy, but also against gravity - and therefore acceleration will be even slower. This means that a month after starting from near-Earth orbit, the tug will still unwind the spiral around the earth, rising higher. You can specifically calculate the time for which, for example, the orbit of the moon will be reached - but let others do it. I'm lazy.
      In a year, the device will reach a speed of 24,5 km / s, i.e. taking into account the initial zero radial component, the average annual speed will be no more than 12,2 km / s. But in reality - less, because it will have to fly to Mars or Jupiter against the gravity of the Sun. Again, with a payload weight of 30 tons (for example, a manned flight to Mars), the acceleration will be 0,36 mm / s / s - less than 1 km / s per month! - and this even without taking into account the attraction of the Sun! It looks sad somehow. Against the background of this calculation, the joyful cries of the inevitability of great victories look unconvincing.
      1. +2
        9 September 2019 16: 16
        Not going into details of calculations. The question will be logical. Is there anything more convenient? Do installations now produce more speed? On the same principles. You also did not consider the possibility of long-term operation, the ability to power equipment with high energy consumption. All this is not available there now, and you are only about one example. It’s all the same if you all this time in the forest for your needs were powered by a solar battery, and now you have 1 megawatt, and the possibilities increase dramatically. Isn't energy the development factor here? Any ideas are limited by power. Always so, unfortunately. And the more power we can provide there, the more we can do.
        1. 0
          9 September 2019 17: 47
          Quote: vargo
          Not going into details of calculations.

          And what will I answer you if you ignore the calculations? So far I see you have one argument - you want this thing to fly and fly well. I also want to. But what is the use of our Wishlist? Moreover, desire is a weak argument, in contrast to the laws of mechanics. Of course, it can be assumed that I considered it wrong, but Newton’s second law is not the kind of physics with which you can get a little naughty and messy.
          1. +2
            9 September 2019 21: 50
            I do not ignore the calculations. I mean that in these calculations, unfortunately, I cannot be a worthy opponent for you or, on the contrary, support your arguments. I'm not that good at this. But in the theses given by me about the duration of work and peak power in orbit (or out of orbit) there is still something that you "want". I don't think you will completely deny this moment.
            I can not also give arguments in favor of the expression, but among the articles there is a phrase about "To Mars in a month, with the possibility of returning." I know that sometimes in a fit of fantasy they can write a lot, but still, I think this expression is based on something.
            1. +2
              9 September 2019 23: 26
              I don't think they are building a real space tug yet. A prototype is being built on which technologies will be tested in the closest space, no further than the orbit around the Earth - and more than one year. In order to obtain overwhelming advantages over "chemistry", it will be necessary to increase the specific power of the power plant - and this is very difficult. Already now there is 3,8 MW of thermal power for about 15 tons of the reactor - an insane power! Probably, they plan to increase the efficiency of radiators - and this can be done by replacing, for example, heavy bismuth with light alloys of sodium or lithium. Alkali metals are highly corrosive, so this task is very difficult. In general, the idea is incredibly complex and very beautiful, and the people who are working on it can be envied for good. But it seems to me that the conversations
              Quote: vargo
              about "To Mars in a month, with the possibility of return"
              do not relate to the construction, but to the future car. I also think that a real working model will fly into deep space (and only there its advantages will manifest in full) not earlier than the end of the fifties. And I’m unlikely to live up to this.
              1. -2
                10 September 2019 20: 32
                It has long been known that low-thrust engines - and this one will be from this category - do not significantly accelerate the flight to Mars. I did not delve into the details of your calculation, but the essence does not contradict the known. The only thing is that when the orbit is ascending, until the ship has entered the departure trajectory, the speed usually decreases, rather than increases. That is, the engine will work for acceleration, and the device will move away from the Earth and slow down, oddly enough. But the "characteristic velocity" will increase.
                The time to reach the orbit of the moon will also be enormous. Such an apparatus can repeatedly wander between the orbits of the Moon and the Earth with low fuel costs, but each flight will be very long, and most likely unmanned.
                How many unmanned cargo are we sending to the orbit of the moon? Yes, not at all!
                How many stations do we send to Mars? I remember - there was Phobos-Grunt, who did not want to fly anywhere.
                Why do we need a twenty-ton nuclear tug? This is Oblomovism (fruitless dreaminess) and propaganda. Why not a similar solar powered tug? Environmentally friendly? Which one can be done now? Most likely, over time, this nuclear "megawatt class" will be quietly forgotten, and that's all.
                1. -2
                  11 September 2019 10: 58
                  Olepyatka: Manilovism, not Oblomovism (this is a slightly different literary character). Although now you can apply another metaphor - Medvedevschina.
  8. +4
    7 September 2019 00: 26
    In this regard, we can assume that the layout of the module for MAX-2019 will soon cease to reflect the real appearance of the product being created.

    It will be so. What layout they piled up, they immediately slap the sphere onil, the dimensions are the same. laughing
    I will add that while there is no alternative to this engine, if we want to fly somewhere. Therefore, it is necessary to refine, since the gravitap is not given in any way winked
  9. 0
    27 September 2019 16: 08
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Here either an ordinal buildup, or there is no sense in the project

    always start somewhere
    the average mileage of the T-34 before failure from 40 km in 1941 was increased by the end of the war to 600
    and the tank was essentially the same
  10. 0
    9 October 2019 12: 29
    A new one, which has no analogues, usually undergoes more than one transformation even before being embodied in metal, especially in space engineering, where each gram is specially registered. This then rolled-in solution is adopted by all those who are interested in saving their own money, but here there is no place to wait for help, even you and I will have little use.
  11. 0
    22 December 2019 11: 39
    Hello everybody. The article is all about what was already in print. The change in the appearance of the product speaks to the awkward thoughts of the designers. There is still no final decision, even in appearance. I was interested in the topic of the efficiency of the nuclear installation. Now the highest efficiency is about 40%. The fuel elements will melt at 1700. Between the illuminated part of the spacecraft and the shadow temperature difference 400-500 and more. Is it really necessary to heat the cosmos, is it really impossible to transform this good into electricity? hi

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"