Military Review

IG terrorists attacked a convoy of Syrian soldiers

65
This week, the Islamic State terrorist group * (IG, banned on the territory of the Russian Federation) staged another ambush on the Syrian military in the province of Dara (Syrian Arab Republic). It is reported by Al Masdar.




According to Al Masdar agency reports, Islamic State militants organized another outing against the Syrian military, attacking them from an ambush along the road connecting Al-Hirak and Isra settlements. It is noted that this is the first attack carried out by bandits from this group in the Yarmuk river basin since the moment they were knocked out of the province during the operation “Basalt” (2018 year).

According to a military report, one of the Syrian Arab Army (CAA) soldiers died. The militants managed to repel the attack.

Idlib


In turn, in Idlib, in territories controlled by militants of a group of the Tahrir al-Sham group banned in Russia, demonstrations took place, during which local residents protested against the militants and their leader al-Jauliani. In the city of Serakib, the terrorists had to suppress the demonstration, but soon a similar manifestation took place in the city of Maaret-en-Numan and the village of Ariha. This was reported by the Halab Today TV news agency.

Deir ez-zor


In Deir ez-Zor, the so-called The "Syrian Democratic Forces", together with the coalition forces led by the United States, conducted an operation to search for terrorists from the Islamic State group. They managed to detain 11 militants, two of them were IS field commanders.

One of them, known as the Talib, the former head of the militant security service during the province’s occupation, is accused of dozens of executions.

aleppo


In the province of Aleppo, clashes between Kurds and pro-Turkish armed groups continue. The artillery of the Turkish army opened fire on the Kurdish "People’s Self-Defense Forces" (YPG), whose positions were located near the village of Maranaz. As a result of the counterattack, the Kurds managed to destroy several militants of the so-called The Syrian Free Army (SSA).

Kurdish units also launched a mortar attack on the SSA positions near the villages of Marea and Kafr Kalbin. The fighting continues in other sectors of the front, among other things, the parties use heavy artillery.
65 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Signal
    Signal 3 September 2019 16: 19
    +1
    The defeated IG. The end and edge are not visible.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 16: 23
      +6
      Quote: Signal
      The defeated IG. The end and edge are not visible.

      As long as the entire territory of Syria is not under the control of the government, this can not be dreamed of.
      1. Alexander Sokolov
        Alexander Sokolov 3 September 2019 16: 24
        +1
        Igilovites also operate in territories controlled by asad, it's time to forget thinking in the framework of the second world war
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 3 September 2019 16: 36
          +7
          Quote: Alexander Sokolov
          Igilovites also operate in territories controlled by asad, it's time to forget thinking in the framework of the second world war

          My thinking is not in the framework of the Second World War, just as long as there are foreign forces on the territory of Syria that train and equip militants, it will not work out. When the territory is controlled by Damascus and the borders are covered, it will be much easier to fight!
          1. Alexander Sokolov
            Alexander Sokolov 3 September 2019 16: 40
            +2
            Through each meter there will be a border guard with a red scarlet, you obviously very poorly imagine the Middle East as a whole and Syria in particular, because you are arguing in the framework of the Soviet model of territory control
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 3 September 2019 17: 10
              +2
              Quote: Alexander Sokolov
              Through each meter there will be a border guard with a red scarlet, you obviously very poorly imagine the Middle East as a whole and Syria in particular, because you are arguing in the framework of the Soviet model of territory control

              And you have little idea of ​​technical means of control, because you think based on the capabilities of technology from the Soviet period.
              1. Alexander Sokolov
                Alexander Sokolov 3 September 2019 17: 21
                +4
                And the Arabs who will sell for the money of the brother will control these means of control. I’m talking about the situation in Syria, come from the Soviet pattern
                1. 1976AG
                  1976AG 3 September 2019 17: 42
                  -2
                  Quote: Alexander Sokolov
                  And the Arabs who will sell for the money of the brother will control these means of control. I’m talking about the situation in Syria, come from the Soviet pattern

                  No need to tell me what my judgments are based on, to consider myself smarter than others is not a sign of a great mind. You have no idea where I was and what I saw.
              2. tihonmarine
                tihonmarine 3 September 2019 18: 04
                +1
                Quote: 1976AG
                And you have little idea of ​​the technical means of control, since you think based on the capabilities of technology from the Soviet period

                No, Alexander presents just right. You yourself imagine the desert, many tribes, and even between the tribes of discord. nepotism, lifestyle, mentality, different religions (even of the same faith, but different movements). Where are these technical means, who will use them and how. There are only hundreds of questions, but there are few answers so far.
                1. 1976AG
                  1976AG 3 September 2019 18: 26
                  +3
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                  Quote: 1976AG
                  And you have little idea of ​​the technical means of control, since you think based on the capabilities of technology from the Soviet period

                  No, Alexander presents just right. You yourself imagine the desert, many tribes, and even between the tribes of discord. nepotism, lifestyle, mentality, different religions (even of the same faith, but different movements). Where are these technical means, who will use them and how. There are only hundreds of questions, but there are few answers so far.

                  You directly described the current situation in Iraq and Libya, but somehow Hussein and Gaddafi were able to solve these issues. And not bad by the way they did it. That is why we now have a center for reconciliation of warring parties in Syria. Have you heard about this? Tribes will fight among themselves until there is a strong central authority. Or do you think that with weak power in any state, even in Europe, even in America there will be order? At once there will be contradictions even within the limits of one small group of the population.
                  1. tihonmarine
                    tihonmarine 3 September 2019 22: 17
                    0
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    Or do you think that with weak power in any state,

                    By the way, I don’t think anything, I just know and answered how Gaddafi and Hussein would have answered.
                    1. 1976AG
                      1976AG 4 September 2019 10: 37
                      0
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      Quote: 1976AG
                      Or do you think that with weak power in any state,

                      By the way, I don’t think anything, I just know and answered how Gaddafi and Hussein would have answered.

                      What you don’t think or do not want to think is, I guessed about the rest, there’s just a curtain))
                      1. tihonmarine
                        tihonmarine 4 September 2019 11: 35
                        0
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        as for the rest, it's just a curtain

                        Something like this.
      2. Nycomed
        Nycomed 3 September 2019 16: 32
        -5
        She ("the entire territory of Syria") will never be under Assad's control. Sunnis never accept Alawite primacy.
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 3 September 2019 16: 37
          +2
          Never say never.
          1. Nycomed
            Nycomed 3 September 2019 16: 41
            -2
            You want to believe in what you want to believe in - this is your right.
          2. Doctor
            Doctor 3 September 2019 16: 55
            0
            Never say never.

            The Alawites are a minority of the population. It is as if the Chinese had put the Tatar in power, and he took over all his senior posts. You must choose the right allies.
            1. Nadrub
              Nadrub 3 September 2019 17: 11
              -3
              And we already have the Tatar in power .... the capital spuds so that only the crack is worth it! And for all the key posts, he ...
              I think everyone understood :))
            2. 1976AG
              1976AG 3 September 2019 17: 15
              -1
              Quote: Arzt
              Never say never.

              The Alawites are a minority of the population. It is as if the Chinese had put the Tatar in power, and he took over all his senior posts. You must choose the right allies.

              Apparently, you would choose IS allies as all-powerful states support them.
              1. Doctor
                Doctor 3 September 2019 19: 55
                -2
                Apparently, you would choose IS allies as all-powerful states support them.

                No, I would, with the help of Ramzan Akhmadovich, pick up a candidate from the Sunnis, most of them there. Yes, he’s already chosen a campaign, he just refused to leave. Bashar has to go with him to the end.
                And as for the states and the IG, you don’t particularly worry, this is temporary until Assad is at the helm. We fought Ahmad Shah Masoud for 10 years, then we supported him in the fight against the Taliban, and now we accept them in Moscow.
                States (like us) are least interested in creating a powerful Islamic state. They consider themselves the heirs of the Roman Republic, which means the main principle of “divide et impera”.
                1. 1976AG
                  1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 17
                  -1
                  Quote: Arzt
                  Apparently, you would choose IS allies as all-powerful states support them.

                  No, I would, with the help of Ramzan Akhmadovich, pick up a candidate from the Sunnis, most of them there. Yes, he’s already chosen a campaign, he just refused to leave. Bashar has to go with him to the end.
                  And as for the states and the IG, you don’t particularly worry, this is temporary until Assad is at the helm. We fought Ahmad Shah Masoud for 10 years, then we supported him in the fight against the Taliban, and now we accept them in Moscow.
                  States (like us) are least interested in creating a powerful Islamic state. They consider themselves the heirs of the Roman Republic, which means the main principle of “divide et impera”.

                  Sunnis do not want to serve in the army, so you are laying another time bomb, the ruling clan will have an army of a hostile clan! So this number will not work.
                  1. Doctor
                    Doctor 3 September 2019 20: 31
                    0
                    Sunnis do not want to serve in the army

                    And then who is fighting the Assad? (Yes, and for Assad).
                    1. 1976AG
                      1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 33
                      -1
                      Quote: Arzt
                      Sunnis do not want to serve in the army

                      And then who is fighting the Assad? (Yes, and for Assad).

                      Understand how Assad came to power, I’m tired of chewing everything for you, let’s already
                  2. Doctor
                    Doctor 3 September 2019 20: 40
                    0
                    the ruling clan will have an army of a hostile clan

                    I did not understand what I mean.
                    I am talking about the need to rely on the majority in the country. No matter what social attribute this majority is organized. In the case of Syria, preferably religiously. Most Syrian citizens are Sunnis (74%). So the president and senior leaders in all areas should be Sunnis. Then most citizens will support them.
                    But of course it should be OUR Sunnis. Faithful foot soldiers in the Middle East.
                    1. Shahno
                      Shahno 3 September 2019 20: 49
                      +1
                      Most in the country? Who is this? If you're talking about the army. Then in Syria, the majority are foreign mercenaries, the most effective and decisive force. .
                      If you are about ordinary citizens. Then there was no free expression of will. And now, in general, a mess.
                    2. 1976AG
                      1976AG 3 September 2019 21: 05
                      0
                      But of course it should be OUR Sunnis. Faithful foot soldiers in the Middle East.
                      You can’t understand the simple thing, if the Sunnis are ours, then for the states they will be enemies like Assad, and again there will be a reason for US intervention in Syria and there will again be war.
                      1. Doctor
                        Doctor 3 September 2019 22: 23
                        -1
                        You can’t understand the simple thing, if the Sunnis are ours, then for the states they will be enemies like Assad, and again there will be a reason for US intervention in Syria and there will again be war.

                        Yes, but the majority of the population will be on our side, which means more chances to win. This is the essence of politics - to choose the strongest side.
                      2. 1976AG
                        1976AG 4 September 2019 10: 45
                        0
                        Most of the population wants peace and a normal life, not war and poverty, and therefore you can always come to an agreement with them, those who receive money for the killings will always fight. To choose the strongest side is the essence of opportunists, and not the essence of politics. The essence of politics is to develop the right tactics and strategy of behavior.
                    3. tihonmarine
                      tihonmarine 3 September 2019 22: 20
                      0
                      Quote: Arzt
                      So the president and senior leaders in all areas should be Sunnis. Then most citizens will support them.

                      You speak as a Soviet person, with his thinking. But not like an Arab.
                2. 1976AG
                  1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 21
                  -1
                  States (like us) are least interested in creating a powerful Islamic state.
                  And therefore, in the five years of the state’s struggle with the Islamic State, terrorists only gained strength. And who supplied the weapons to the terrorists? Isn't it the states? You have fantasized a lot.
                  1. Doctor
                    Doctor 3 September 2019 20: 24
                    -1
                    And who supplied the weapons to the terrorists?

                    And they will deliver. Until Assad leaves. And if our protege again comes to Assad’s place, they will continue deliveries. But if Syria is headed by a state governor, then the first thing he will cover is IG. (But we will not allow this. wink ).
                    1. 1976AG
                      1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 28
                      +1
                      Until Assad leaves.
                      Are you an employee of the US State Department? What have you done "Assad must go"? We will help him, so sorry, move over!
                      1. Doctor
                        Doctor 3 September 2019 20: 44
                        -1
                        We will help him

                        We will, where to go, we must keep our word. But for the majority of the Syrian population, he will remain a stranger whose power rests on foreign bayonets (or bombers if you want). And that means we are stuck again.
                      2. 1976AG
                        1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 56
                        0
                        Quote: Arzt
                        We will help him

                        We will, where to go, we must keep our word. But for the majority of the Syrian population, he will remain a stranger whose power rests on foreign bayonets (or bombers if you want). And that means we are stuck again.

                        Before the armed conflict, the population of Syria lived well with this "outsider" and they already understood that they succumbed to foreign influence and made a big mistake in this. To bring back the way of life that was before the conflict and in their interests too, so not everything is as gloomy as you think. Well, in the very near future we will have a testing ground for weapons and military equipment, which has no alternative.
                      3. Doctor
                        Doctor 3 September 2019 21: 11
                        -1
                        they succumbed to foreign influence and made a big mistake in this; they already understood.

                        In Russia, it is believed that the West (mainly the United States) is conducting a large-scale operation to overthrow the former Soviet regimes in Arab countries. But not so simple.
                        Here is Primakov’s opinion:
                        The Arab Spring is primarily disadvantageous for the Americans. The previous regimes suited them, because their leaders fought against Islamic extremism and terrorists. "Spring" began spontaneously, but its spread across the Arab countries is already associated with the latest technologies - the Internet, television, and other communications. The Islamists "saddled" this process. Their organizations have taken control of the situation, and this must be reckoned with. "
                        (Interview to the newspaper "Century" on 16.04.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX)
                      4. 1976AG
                        1976AG 3 September 2019 21: 44
                        0
                        Quote: Arzt
                        they succumbed to foreign influence and made a big mistake in this; they already understood.

                        In Russia, it is believed that the West (mainly the United States) is conducting a large-scale operation to overthrow the former Soviet regimes in Arab countries. But not so simple.
                        Here is Primakov’s opinion:
                        The Arab Spring is primarily disadvantageous for the Americans. The previous regimes suited them, because their leaders fought against Islamic extremism and terrorists. "Spring" began spontaneously, but its spread across the Arab countries is already associated with the latest technologies - the Internet, television, and other communications. The Islamists "saddled" this process. Their organizations have taken control of the situation, and this must be reckoned with. "
                        (Interview to the newspaper "Century" on 16.04.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX)

                        Primakov did not find the time when the states supplied them with weapons, otherwise he would have adjusted his opinion. And how did they fight IS? Is it that the states don’t know how to fight, or didn’t want to fight them if the result of their struggle was the further spread of IS in Syria? But are the Taliban and Al Qaeda their product? First create a ter.organization, and then type fight with them. And the matter is not in the former Soviet regimes, but simply eliminate those who, for whatever reason, become not pleasing to them.
        2. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 September 2019 18: 07
          0
          Quote: Nycomed
          Sunnis will never recognize the supremacy of the Alawites.

          Correctly. But they can come to some kind of agreement, and then rather a minor agreement. If the war is very tired, they will find a compromise. But everything is very complicated there.
        3. capsid
          capsid 3 September 2019 19: 40
          -2
          Quote: Nycomed
          She ("the entire territory of Syria") will never be under Assad's control. Sunnis never accept Alawite primacy.

          Will, maybe after Assad ...
      3. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 3 September 2019 17: 57
        0
        Quote: 1976AG
        As long as the entire territory of Syria is not under the control of the government, this can not be dreamed of.

        And this will not happen soon, they do not give and do not want to give peace there.
  3. Alexander Sokolov
    Alexander Sokolov 3 September 2019 16: 22
    +1
    IG is impossible to defeat, IG is an idea, it’s in the minds
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 16: 38
      +4
      Quote: Alexander Sokolov
      IG is impossible to defeat, IG is an idea, it’s in the minds

      But the scale of activity can be reduced many times.
      1. Wolverine
        Wolverine 4 September 2019 10: 32
        0
        Quote: 1976AG
        Quote: Alexander Sokolov
        IG is impossible to defeat, IG is an idea, it’s in the minds

        But the scale of activity can be reduced many times.

        No, not like that, it’s grandmas in the pocket of the sponsors, plus robbery and murder, under the guise of the United States.
  4. Old26
    Old26 3 September 2019 17: 00
    +3
    Quote: 1976AG
    But the scale of activity can be reduced many times.

    Can. But do not forget that guerrilla wars can last for decades.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 17: 13
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: 1976AG
      But the scale of activity can be reduced many times.

      Can. But do not forget that guerrilla wars can last for decades.

      And no one forgets, just if you got down to business, you need to work to the maximum, and if you think like you, then you need to drop everything and surrender to the winner, only mercy will not come from him.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 September 2019 18: 13
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      Can. But do not forget that guerrilla wars can last for decades.

      To begin, shut off the supply.
  5. Old26
    Old26 3 September 2019 18: 00
    0
    Quote: 1976AG
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: 1976AG
    But the scale of activity can be reduced many times.

    Can. But do not forget that guerrilla wars can last for decades.

    And no one forgets, just if you got down to business, you need to work to the maximum, and if you think like you, then you need to drop everything and surrender to the winner, only mercy will not come from him.

    Oh, are you already reading my mind? Didn't you try to think about how to carry out a cleanup of the territory in which there are several tens of thousands of civilians and several thousand militants dissolved between them? This is a very, very difficult task. And you immediately, to the maximum. Yes, you can and to the maximum. Cover this town with Buratin, no matter who gets hit. Peaceful or militants. Then walk through the aircraft, pour napalm and fill it with fragmentation bombs. And the third stage is the infantry units. This will be the maximum ...
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 18: 08
      0
      Well, what are you all exaggerating so? Cleaning up the territory is of course a complicated matter, I didn’t even think about arguing on this issue, it’s just one thing when you puff up and clean up the territory, and at this time new groups of terrorists seep into this very territory and it’s a completely different thing when the borders are under control and your efforts are not in vain .
  6. Old26
    Old26 3 September 2019 18: 24
    0
    Quote: 1976AG
    Well, what are you all exaggerating so? Cleaning up the territory is of course a complicated matter, I didn’t even think about arguing on this issue, it’s just one thing when you puff up and clean up the territory, and at this time new groups of terrorists seep into this very territory and it’s a completely different thing when the borders are under control and your efforts are not in vain .

    I will not exaggerate. Syria, as someone wrote to you correctly earlier, is not the territory of Russia. Semi-desert terrain, even at the borders, at least around cities (provinces). The issue of territory control is very acute. There would be no problems if Assad would have a multi-million army, which could tightly close the borders and carry out the blockade of gangster enclaves. But she is not there. Even according to pre-war data, he had about 150 thousand armed forces. How much was left as a result of several years of civil war, how much went into the camp of his opponents. This is a question that cannot be unambiguously answered now. Therefore, I wrote that the guerrilla war will continue for years, if not decades, especially in a cauldron like Syria. After all, as the IG wrote correctly - this is not only an organization, but an ideology. It is enough for 3-5 carriers of this ideology to leak through the cordons with civilians and they will begin their destructive work already in the cleared area
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 18: 35
      0
      And what, the territory of Russia is a fairly simple option for you? Yes, we have no desert, but we have mountains. Or do you think it is easier to control the territory there? And the number of troops here will not help you either. The fact that it will be easy I never said. And the rest of the questions, as I said, to the experience of Hussein and Gaddafi. And by the way, they also did not exhibit a border outfit on every meter of the desert. So inappropriately here about the millionth armies.
    2. 1976AG
      1976AG 3 September 2019 18: 38
      -1
      And what am I talking about Hussein and Gaddafi, refer to the experience of Hafez al-Assad - there is a XNUMX% recipe.
      1. Nycomed
        Nycomed 3 September 2019 20: 00
        0
        There is a very bad recipe; They chewed off their own little head for Grandpa Muamar, Grandfather Saddam was pulled out of the "rat" hole and thrown a loop around his neck. Grandfather Hafiz, by the will of fate, avoided this. Therefore, I want to say: run, Bashar, run! am
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 3 September 2019 20: 13
          +1
          Quote: Nycomed
          There is a very bad recipe; They chewed off their own little head for Grandpa Muamar, Grandfather Saddam was pulled out of the "rat" hole and thrown a loop around his neck. Grandfather Hafiz, by the will of fate, avoided this. Therefore, I want to say: run, Bashar, run! am

          Well, you understand who arranged it, what kind of naughty ones are there? But you understood what I meant, these countries flourished until democracy was exported there. So you can live well with the composition of the population, if you do not do stupid things. And with stupidity, Yanukovych in the enlightened geyrope almost paid his life.
          1. Nycomed
            Nycomed 3 September 2019 21: 15
            0
            Well, first of all, you and I didn't have a brotherhood. And these tales, about how well they lived, tell someone else. And the "export of" Gaddafia "to Chad and Sudan, how is it?
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 3 September 2019 21: 19
              0
              Quote: Nycomed
              Well, first of all, you and I didn't have a brotherhood. And these tales, about how well they lived, tell someone else. And the "export of" Gaddafia "to Chad and Sudan, how is it?

              Brudershaft was not, I apologize. And how can you live from different sources and what happened before was much better than it is now, so there is something to compare.
              1. Nycomed
                Nycomed 3 September 2019 21: 44
                +1
                Apologies are accepted. hi
        2. AKS-U
          AKS-U 4 September 2019 01: 00
          +1
          No need to drive Assad from his land. Such and GDP can be driven. No successes whatsoever. Fires alone, modernization, and ... the growth of taxpayer welfare in each RosStat report.
  7. bbtcs
    bbtcs 3 September 2019 22: 50
    -2
    Quote: Arzt
    But we will not allow this.

    Loves a banned organization in Russia !? am am
    It's interesting to read you. "Your" Sunnis, "your" Assads. And where is mine? And why do I need "your"?
    "You have no idea where I was! ...". And I'm not going to represent your dirt.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 4 September 2019 14: 15
      0
      "You have no idea where I was! ...". And I'm not going to represent your dirt.
      And I didn’t write this to you, so you can pass by.
  8. bbtcs
    bbtcs 3 September 2019 22: 53
    -2
    Quote: 1976AG
    Well, you understand who arranged it, what kind of their

    Very own. And there is nothing to blame for America (and the Russian rulers). The Arabs themselves have a crooked face.
    In vain you defend the Busurman. Soak them in mud.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 4 September 2019 14: 06
      0
      Quote: bbtcs
      Quote: 1976AG
      Well, you understand who arranged it, what kind of their

      Very own. And there is nothing to blame for America (and the Russian rulers). The Arabs themselves have a crooked face.
      In vain you defend the Busurman. Soak them in mud.

      When America ceases to climb where it is not asked, then it will stop blaming.
  9. bbtcs
    bbtcs 3 September 2019 22: 58
    -3
    Quote: 1976AG
    geyrope

    There is nothing to lie. Everything about them is normal with orientation.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 4 September 2019 14: 09
      0
      Quote: bbtcs
      Quote: 1976AG
      geyrope

      There is nothing to lie. Everything about them is normal with orientation.

      I'm not lying. Their gay parades are watched by the whole world and their upbringing of the younger generation in the style of "parent 1" and "parent 2" instead of dad and mom is not a secret for us either. A person with a normal orientation would never allow this.
  10. bbtcs
    bbtcs 3 September 2019 23: 03
    -2
    Quote: 1976AG
    We will help him

    At the expense of the Russian people, yeah. and the Americans were going to overthrow at the expense of the American. Feel the difference! What is beneficial for a Russian person? So that the 1976AG never helps anyone.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 4 September 2019 14: 12
      0
      Quote: bbtcs
      Quote: 1976AG
      We will help him

      At the expense of the Russian people, yeah. and the Americans were going to overthrow at the expense of the American. Feel the difference! What is beneficial for a Russian person? So that the 1976AG never helps anyone.

      The Americans are also deploying their bases near our borders at the expense of their own and geyropekskih taxpayers, and we are forced to take retaliatory measures at our own expense, also order to abandon them? Sitting silently watching, but the money is not wasted.
  11. AKS-U
    AKS-U 4 September 2019 00: 56
    0
    Do not take prisoner.