Tu-22M3M: modernization, achievements and plans

71
On 30 on August 1969 the first flight of the Tu-22M long-range bomber took place. Subsequently, such equipment entered service and went through a series of modernizations. The next aircraft renewal project is being implemented right now. The appearance of the upgraded Tu-22М3М will allow maintaining the fleet of bombers, raising their characteristics to the required level. To date, aircraft manufacturers and the military have managed to reveal some of the information about the current project.


Rollout of the first prototype Tu-22М3М




Exterior elements


According to open data, the Tu-22М3М project does not provide for a major restructuring of the airframe, although some changes are proposed. At the same time, the modernization of existing aircraft should be carried out with the implementation of overhaul and extension of the resource.

One of the most notable innovations of the Tu-22М3М project is the installation of a fuel receiver rod covered by a characteristic casing. In-flight refueling facilities were used on early versions of the Tu-22M, but they were removed in accordance with the OSV-2 agreement. Now there are no restrictions of this kind, and bombers can get the rods back. The possibility of refueling will increase the combat radius of aircraft. Now this parameter, depending on the flight profile and combat load, does not exceed 2-2,5 thousand km. The presence of a rod will ensure the growth of such characteristics.

There is another external difference - in the tail. With Tu-22М3М the stern cannon installation is removed, instead of which a fairing with some devices is installed. According to new ideas, for self-defense, a bomber should not use weapon, and electronic or other means of counteraction.

Onboard equipment


The biggest changes in the Tu-22М3М project are related to the on-board equipment complex. Stated replacement approx. 80% of systems for various purposes. The use of new devices for navigation, communications, arms control, etc. is envisaged. It is curious that the new complex for the Tu-22М3М is partially unified with the avionics of the promising Tu-160М2. This should simplify the simultaneous operation of two types of aircraft and their joint combat use.

The equipment of pilots' workplaces is being significantly processed. At the same time, new devices improve crew awareness and partially unload it. In particular, reference information and various materials for navigators are now available in electronic form, which simplifies the work and also allows you to put paper media in reserve.



For a more effective solution to combat missions, the installation of the SVP-24-22 Hephaestus system is provided, which provides automatic processing of various information and provides data for the use of unguided weapons. In addition, the sighting and navigation system provides compatibility with all modern and promising long-range cruise missiles aviation.

Apparently, other areas of modernization of avionics are also planned, but the details are still a mystery. Perhaps new interesting data will appear in the near future.

weaponry


During the modernization of the Tu-22M3M must maintain full compatibility with all weapons of the base Tu-22M3, with the exception of those decommissioned. Thus, the X-22 anti-ship missile or its upgraded version will remain one of the main weapons. Also, the aircraft will be able to carry and use unguided bombs of various types and calibers. Probably, the military will not refuse the possibility of using sea mines.

In the past, the possibility of using new missiles of various types was repeatedly mentioned. These can be X-101 and X-555 products. It is also known about the intention to introduce the “Dagger” missile system. Thus, after modernization, the Tu-22М3 will be able to carry a variety of weapons suitable for hitting various ground or surface targets. The range of tasks to be expanded and the effectiveness of such work will increase.


The first flight of the Tu-22M3M


With all this, the aircraft, as already mentioned, loses its built-in weapons. In modern conditions, the presence of the GSh-23 gun is not necessary, and the compartment of the stern artillery mount is given for other equipment.

Achievements and plans


The first modernized Tu-22М3М was rolled out of the assembly shop of the Kazan aircraft plant in August last year. On December 28 he made his first flight. Over the past months, several new flights took place in different modes, during which new instruments and equipment were being tested.

In June of this year it was reported that a second prototype aircraft would soon be withdrawn from the workshop. Its appearance will speed up flight tests of new equipment, which will contribute to a more rapid completion of the current stages of the project. Based on the test results of the two machines, the final decision will be made to launch the modernization of the Tu-22М3 aircraft under the new project.

According to open data, now in the Russian Aerospace Forces there are about 60 Tu-22М3 aircraft. Modernization of the new project will be half of this technology. Works on a serial basis will start in the foreseeable future and will take several years. After that, an equal number of updated Tu-22М3М and Tu-22М3 in the previous configuration will be in service. It is expected that this will increase the combat effectiveness of long-range aviation.

Benefits of modernization


One of the main advantages of the Tu-22М3М project is the fact of updating existing equipment. A well-developed and time-tested platform in the form of the Tu-22М3 receives new equipment and weapons that meet the requirements of the time. As a result, the growth potential of long-range aviation is ensured without the cost of building completely new aircraft.



Despite the preservation of engines, a glider and a number of general aircraft systems, the flight and combat characteristics of the Tu-22M3M are growing. The presence of refueling facilities in flight allows you to increase both range and combat radius. Moreover, the aircraft does not contradict international treaties. So, earlier Russia notified the United States that the range of aircraft does not exceed 8 thousand km, and they comply with START-3.

The aerobatic and combat qualities of bombers are enhanced by new equipment. Improved avionics simplifies the flight, allows you to more accurately go to the lines of application and more efficient use of weapons.

The expansion of the range of ammunition due to new samples is an undoubted plus. At the same time, it is proposed to both modernize existing missiles and introduce completely new ones. The X-32 and Dagger missiles, as well as other weapons, will provide a solution to a wide range of combat missions, including in the face of enemy opposition.

However, the current project and current plans of the aerospace forces regarding the Tu-22М3 have weaknesses. The problem can be considered the timing of the project. So, work on a large modernization of aircraft called Tu-22M4 started back in the mid-eighties, but did not give real results. A new major modernization project is being implemented only now, and its results will appear only in the foreseeable future.


Tu-22M3 in the original configuration


Another cause for concern is the number of updated cars. In the VKS there are only 60 Tu-22М3 bombers, and only half of this equipment will undergo modernization. Whether this will give all the desired benefits is unknown. It may be necessary to modernize the entire park to achieve the maximum positive effect, but it is impossible due to lack of funding.

Service continues


At the moment, only the Tu-22М3, previously undergoing scheduled repairs and upgrades, is present in the fleet of long-range combatant aircraft. In the new M3M configuration, there is only one aircraft, and another aircraft is due to be tested soon. Massive technology upgrades remain a thing of the future.

The events of the following years are obvious. Tu-22M3M will successfully reach the operation in the troops and increase the combat effectiveness of long-range aviation. The service of machines of the Tu-22M family will continue. Half a century has passed since the day of the first flight of such a bomber, and this equipment will probably also celebrate new anniversaries in the service.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 September 2019 18: 21
    "One of the most notable innovations of the Tu-22M3M project is the installation of a fuel receiver rod, .."
    HOORAY! HOORAY! HOORAY! Guys, I'm crying :) But this, tears of happiness. Really ... Well, finally. Oh! I didn’t think that I would survive, right :)

    Super news! "Bomb!" You made my mood before New Year :)
    How glad I am! Oh!

    UPD / PS In wild debates, Andrei Nikolaevich gave birth to this car together with Alexander Borisovich Gorodesky, the greatest aviation mathematician (I was small then, arrogant and greyhound). How happy i am Job grandfathers got a second wind!
    Overwhelming.
    1. +5
      3 September 2019 18: 31
      Keep good!!! Dalnik becomes practically a Strategist! good
      Good luck ... Killer Aircraft Carriers (if also with a Dagger !!!)
    2. +15
      3 September 2019 22: 49
      More than 250 Tu-22M3 aircraft were produced; in 1992, about 150 aircraft remained in the Air Force and Navy; now, not 60 are operational, but about 40, of which it makes sense to upgrade 30 aircraft, with a resource extension to the next repair ....
      What kind of increase in combat power is meant, in 10 years they will all fall apart. The airframe scheme is not resourceful, the wing is small and also loaded with an inverter, the fuselage does not carry ... Why are they being upgraded? For two reasons. First, from hopelessness, there are no others ... Second, equipment is put on them from 160, because it is not profitable to arrange the production of new equipment for 20 aircraft, but for more or less for 50 ... Where is it relaxing?
      1. +5
        3 September 2019 23: 08
        Read:
        https://topwar.ru/92587-tu-22m3-pora-na-pensiyu.html
      2. +3
        4 September 2019 00: 33
        61 Tu-22M3, 1 Tu-22M3M and 1 Tu-22MR (in overhaul), as of 2018 (The military balance. P199).
      3. 0
        4 September 2019 01: 11
        hi all this is sad.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      4 September 2019 03: 20
      Quote: Gnefredov
      "One of the most notable innovations of the Tu-22M3M project is the installation of a fuel receiver rod, .."
      HOORAY! HOORAY! HOORAY! Guys, I'm crying :) But this, tears of happiness. Really ... Well, finally. Oh! I didn’t think that I would survive, right :)

      good The rare ability to present material with such an ironic (sarcastic?) Background ... fellow
    6. 0
      11 January 2024 08: 43
      I am writing to you from 2024; unfortunately, your joy turned out to be premature. For 5 years, no information has been received about the modernization of the M3 into the M3M modification. As the old people were in their Soviet modification, they remain the same. Alas
  2. +1
    3 September 2019 18: 51
    Yes, this idea has endured such a bunch of everything that God forbid! The first "emki" categorically did not like our Air Force (in the memoirs of V.V. Reshetnikov, this is all described). The Tupolevites agreed with this and made the Tu-22M3, but how much time has passed ... And the refueling system is still a "song". Thank God, all these problems have been overcome and the car can be upgraded further. All the same - there are no alternatives. angry
  3. +14
    3 September 2019 18: 54
    The number of millionaires and billionaires is increasing, and there is not enough funding even for aviation. Is it time to resolve this contradiction in the direction of aviation? request
    1. +2
      3 September 2019 20: 02
      Financing is always not enough, but hundreds of Su-30/35/34 hundreds of Yak-130 hundreds of Ka-52 Mi-8/28/35 helicopters have been received recently by the aircraft (including) considerable funds have been allocated, planes are being built and developed military transport aircraft.

      You compare this to what it was 10 years ago, and then whine.
      1. -6
        3 September 2019 20: 08
        Great comment. Right, for you: drinks
      2. -4
        3 September 2019 20: 20
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        and then whine.

        Both before and after. Is always. Type of character such
      3. +7
        4 September 2019 03: 31
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Funding is always in short supply, but for aviation

        Financing is always not enough, but considerable funds have been allocated recently for aviation (including). Thousands of Su-30/35/34/37/38/39/40 enter the troops; millions of Yak-130/131/132; billions of helicopters Ka-52/53/54/55, Mi-8/28/35/45/55. Yachts, palaces, landlords' lands are being built on Moscow and other lands, schemes for withdrawing money from the budget by various difficult to detect schemes are being developed, even jet planes for personal aviation appear.
        And you compare it with what it was 40 years ago, and then squeal with happiness and overwhelming euphoria.
        In the very first post you were given to understand how to correctly accept this news about "deep modernization" Didn't you get it? Then here:
        Quote: VO3A
        More than 250 Tu-22M3 aircraft were produced; in 1992, about 150 aircraft remained in the Air Force and Navy; now, not 60 are operational, but about 40, of which it makes sense to upgrade 30 aircraft, with a resource extension to the next repair ....
        What kind of increase in combat power is meant, in 10 years they will all fall apart. The airframe scheme is not resourceful, the wing is small and also loaded with an inverter, the fuselage does not carry ... Why are they being upgraded? For two reasons. First, from hopelessness, there are no others ... Second, equipment is put on them from 160, because it is not profitable to arrange the production of new equipment for 20 aircraft, but for more or less for 50 ... Where is it relaxing?

        And you, like that Chubais, are all happy about the allocation of money ...
    2. -2
      3 September 2019 20: 18
      Quote: Ros 56
      Is it time to resolve this contradiction in the direction of aviation

      And the navy is worse?
  4. 0
    3 September 2019 19: 10
    Didn't the crew be reduced from 4x to 2x?
    Somebody knows?
    1. 0
      3 September 2019 19: 47
      No (and done right).
      1. -1
        3 September 2019 20: 13
        A radio operator shooter now where?
        1. +2
          3 September 2019 23: 23
          A radio operator shooter now where?


          He never was there. A commander with a pravak, and two navigators (navigation and weapons)
          1. 0
            3 September 2019 23: 31
            I think he has a twin gun in his tail, who should shoot from it?
            1. +1
              4 September 2019 07: 57
              Now no one, she was completely removed as unnecessary. But they did something, and they didn’t say what, but for defense.
              1. 0
                4 September 2019 19: 41
                Quote: karabass
                I think he has a twin gun in his tail, who should shoot from it?

                Quote: Ros 56
                it was completely removed as unnecessary.

    2. -8
      3 September 2019 20: 21
      Quote: Old Operator
      Didn't the crew be reduced from 4x to 2x?

      But how can it be reduced? Everyone has a job
  5. +14
    3 September 2019 19: 33
    "Another cause for concern is the number of vehicles being upgraded. The Aerospace Forces has only 60 Tu-22M3 bombers, and only half of this technology will be upgraded. Whether this will give all the desired advantages is unknown."
    hi
    So it really is.
    How many there were and how many became, and how they were transferred from the Navy to the Air Force is a separate song. But the barmaley are bombed.
    1. +6
      3 September 2019 22: 58
      If only 30 were collected during the examination, they can still write off a lot ..., especially after 10 years, everyone will go to the trash ....
      1. -6
        4 September 2019 14: 38
        it's time for you to hand over the trash ((((
        1. +4
          4 September 2019 16: 14
          Sorry to upset your fantasies with the harsh reality of life ....
          1. -5
            4 September 2019 16: 20
            better then they will again leave reality)))
      2. 0
        4 September 2019 21: 34
        Specialist, mean? Assigned resource glider 45-03 do not tell me?
        1. 0
          4 September 2019 22: 47
          I'm interested too. I left the Su-24, there 10 + 8 + 7 = 25 there, and then, as with the complex of work to extend the resource ... And for the flight hours ... 45 is this the last series? Specify a resource if there is infa ....
  6. +7
    3 September 2019 19: 38
    Quote: Old Operator
    Didn't the crew be reduced from 4x to 2x?
    Somebody knows?

    Judging by the presence of side glazing for the second row of seats - a crew of 4
    1. +2
      3 September 2019 19: 45
      Glasses to remove is to change the design of the glider, which is not easy. And replacing seats with fuel tanks is much easier. Probable "partners" for B2 have 2 people.
      1. +2
        3 September 2019 19: 47
        There are five people on the B-52, why don't they clean up to two?
        1. +8
          3 September 2019 20: 13
          Because someone needs to crawl / reach the bomb bay and pull out the fuses from the "vigorous loaf".

          PS This is not a banter or a joke. For Americans, the procedures in the flight map (had the ability to read it) are registered.
          1. +1
            3 September 2019 20: 23
            Quote: Gnefredov
            the procedures in the flight map (had the ability to read it) are registered

            What kind of anachronism do Americans have, by the way, in the article under discussion it says that ......reference information and various materials for navigators are now available electronically, some inattentively read articles, then they ask a question about the size of the crew.
  7. +10
    3 September 2019 19: 47
    Quote: Old Operator
    Didn't the crew be reduced from 4x to 2x?
    Somebody knows?

    If I find out, I'll tell you (maybe). In fact (I am a supporter of the old concept, when no one and nothing can replace a person) - I think the configuration of the crew - is ideal. Ideal in the sense that the PIC is already loaded up with problems. I would not castrate the crew.
    PS A long time ago, .. Back in 1977, ... I listened to the negotiations of the flight crew. I heard enough. Hmm, after that, all the headphones in the headsets were redone (this is my, incidental, modest contribution to the domestic aviation).
    1. +1
      4 September 2019 06: 17
      Hmm, after that, all the headphones in the headsets were redone (this is my, incidental, modest contribution to the domestic aviation).

      not headphones. The laryngophones were removed and the microphone was mounted in the CM. It was so. But not for long
  8. -12
    3 September 2019 19: 50
    Quote: Ros 56
    The number of millionaires and billionaires is increasing, and there is not enough funding even for aviation. Is it time to resolve this contradiction in the direction of aviation? request

    No need to look into the pockets of others. Do you think Khrushchev was poor? Haha
    Exactly.
    Millionaires and billionaires (as you wrote above) live their own lives.
    Do not go to them, go about your business.
  9. +6
    3 September 2019 19: 53
    Quote: Nycomed
    Tupolevs agreed with this and made the Tu-22M3


    To be honest, this is Myasishchev’s car (like the TU-160). But the party ordered, the Party members answered, there are!

    PS I'm sorry OKB-23.
    1. +2
      4 September 2019 08: 37
      Quote: Gnefredov
      To be honest, this is Myasishchev’s car (like the TU-160). But the party ordered, the Party members answered, there are!

      About Tu-160 - which is true, then true!
      But about the Tu-22M - some news ... She got such an index because Tupolev already had the Tu-22.

      The country's leadership at that time refused to finance new developments of "strategists", so Tupolev came up with a bike with "deep modernization". For the aircraft, by the way, this turned out sideways: in order to preserve at least the appearance of continuity with the Tu-22, the car was made a low-wing aircraft, but for structures with variable wing geometry, the high-wing aircraft is optimal. I.e for political reasons the car consciously not designed in the most optimal way.
  10. -3
    3 September 2019 20: 04
    Quote: Ros 56
    The number of millionaires and billionaires is increasing, and there is not enough funding even for aviation. Is it time to resolve this contradiction in the direction of aviation? request


    What side does this concern you?

    and enough funding is not enough even for aviation

    Well, tell us about financing, national aviation. Tell us about the sufficiency of funding. I turned into ears. Go ahead. Talk step by step, step by step. All the attention.
  11. +1
    3 September 2019 20: 08
    Quote: Old Operator
    And replacing seats with fuel tanks is much easier.

    Oh. No, not easier.
    1. 0
      4 September 2019 08: 48
      Quote: Gnefredov

      Quote: Old Operator
      And replacing seats with fuel tanks is much easier.

      Oh. No, not easier.

      In fact, it is even useful to "remove the glass" and even the hatches: the alterations are minimal and they do not weaken, but strengthen the structure (since there are fewer cutouts and connectors, and the original power set remains). Plus, the design becomes lighter by a hundred or two kilograms (taking into account the removal of a crew member and all his life support equipment). Although it is not a fact that this is good: the center of gravity will go back, and the car may become unstable - you will have to put some kind of ballast.
      But with TB, things are different: there you have to pull up the armature and change the algorithm for generating tanks. The alignment, again, will somehow change ... Although there are examples of such ...
      1. 0
        4 September 2019 09: 33


        It’s incomprehensible, this is exactly the new-old refueling rod ??? Or a fairing under the antenna?
        1. 0
          4 September 2019 21: 35
          Quote: NN52
          It’s incomprehensible, this is exactly the new-old refueling rod ???

          The bar is lower, and still "shooting".

  12. +1
    3 September 2019 20: 15
    Quote: karabass
    A radio operator shooter now where?

    ??
    1. 0
      4 September 2019 08: 40
      Quote: Gnefredov

      Quote: karabass
      A radio operator shooter now where?

      ??

      Liquor chassis drink!
      1. +1
        4 September 2019 09: 16
        Liquor chassis drink!

        Our sword is all :)
        By the way, many people know about the sword, but not many come from this name
        1. +1
          4 September 2019 09: 50
          Quote: Ka-52
          Our sword is all :)
          By the way, many people know about the sword, but not many come from this name

          By the way, on old bombers the button for spraying the "sword" was just at the rear shooter ("... I will boil the" sword ": I don't drink - and you don't drink!").
          At VK at the institute, it seems, they told us that this is an official abbreviation (but I forgot its decoding over the past years and uselessness), but there is another version:
          The “epee” was poured into the tank in the “Wind” compartment through the filler neck on board the aircraft, and its level in the tank was measured with a rubber ruler, on which the liquid left a wet mark, as the oil left a mark on the dipstick, which is used to measure the oil level in a car engine . The ruler had a handle of a special shape that resembled a guard - a protective device on the hilt of a cold weapon. Therefore, the "sword". The length of the line just roughly corresponded to the length of the blade of a combat sword.

          ([media = https: //weapon.temadnya.com/948902318097041704/shpaga/])
          1. +2
            4 September 2019 10: 35
            At VK at the institute, it seems, they told us that this is the official abbreviation

            The official name is SHS.
            but there is another version:

            Yes sir. Because of her, darling.
            1. +1
              4 September 2019 10: 40
              Quote: Ka-52
              Yes sir. Because of her, darling.

              On the Su-7B (and U) SHS was used to cool the brakes. Along the gazovka, Shishig drove with a tank, and technicians ran to her with banal aluminum kettles ...
              But merge SHS from the Su-7th was very difficult ...
              1. +2
                4 September 2019 11: 33
                But to merge the SHS with the Su-7th was very difficult.

                In fact, they called it a sword with us, in YES, and the sailors seemed to call it a helmet.
                And also for migrants - GSR-12KIS (25x emnip): combined evaporation system
                At 22x, the SHS was used to cool the cab. From the 9th stage of the compressor, air was drawn into the air system. Initial cooling took place at TCU, then through an evaporator with SHS. Accordingly, you fly sweating - but then you have a heating pad. Merged without any problems
                On the Su-7B (and U)

                On the Yak-28u sparks, it also seemed to be cooling the SHS brake pads. 20l per day. Its name there was shadyma (shalyma) or something like that.
                1. +2
                  4 September 2019 13: 13
                  Quote: Ka-52
                  Its name there was shadyma (shalyma) or something like that.

                  It would be nice for someone to embed the article: where was it used, how was it called, how was it drained, how was it drunk ...
  13. 0
    3 September 2019 21: 22
    They also promised NK32 turbojet engines
  14. +3
    3 September 2019 21: 43
    Sad number of 60 only 30 will undergo modernization. Let the other 30 fly as is.
    1. +4
      4 September 2019 03: 38
      Quote: Pavel57
      Sad number of 60 only 30 will undergo modernization. Let the other 30 fly as is.

      Sad that the polls By modernization, some civilians are trying to hide the inconsistency in the development of individual weapons systems and equipment. I'd love to see the modernization of PAK YES ...
      Let the rest fly on what they "sent", and new weapons should be welcomed in the Russian house ...
      1. 0
        4 September 2019 08: 55
        Quote: ROSS 42
        It is sad that some civilians are trying to hide the inconsistency in the development of individual weapon systems and equipment by universal modernization.

        And what's wrong with modernization?
        Vaughn B-52 is 22 years older than Tu-15M (namely "M" - the first of the family's cars), but they still form the basis of the fleet of US Air Force strategists - all sorts of "Lancers" and "Spirits" did not take root, a new bomber will appear , it is not clear when. And the old man Stratofortress serves himself and serves, flies and flies, loads enemies with bombs and "Tomahawks" and loads ... And at the same time he survived as many as ... 11 modernizations ([media = https: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki / Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress # Upgrades])
        1. 0
          4 September 2019 16: 34
          The B-52 has a glider with a large resource, it will fly for a long time ... But the Tu-22M3 has a glider with a small resource, since it is heavily overloaded ... A long fuselage of insufficient rigidity, but it is not as bad as a heavily loaded small one the wing also has swivel lower parts of the consoles ... The mount of the swivel part is cracking with time, and it is not titanium, like on the Tu-160 ... The latter will also be written off for the same reason .. The scheme of aircraft with a PCP is a necessary compromise in the direction of flight performance due to the deterioration of the airframe’s life, the decrease in its use efficiency, and the extra weight ... Everyone has abandoned such an outdated scheme for a long time ... So, there is no need to repeat the fairy tale about the TU-160 ...
          1. +1
            4 September 2019 17: 52
            Quote: VO3A
            So, what about the perfect TU-160 fairy tale does not need to be repeated ...

            And who is repeating it here?
  15. +4
    3 September 2019 21: 45
    At the moment, only the Tu-22M3, previously undergoing scheduled repairs and upgrades, is present in the fleet of long-range combatant aircraft equipment.

    And now another upgrade? And then more and more?
    There are only 60 Tu-22M3 bombers in the VKS, and only half of this equipment will undergo modernization. Whether this will give all the desired benefits is unknown.

    And here it was also necessary to begin!
    So, work on a large modernization of aircraft called Tu-22M4 started back in the mid-eighties, but did not give real results.

    This was when the USSR was, unique qualified personnel, specialists, etc.
  16. -7
    3 September 2019 22: 06
    Quote: Lipchanin
    Quote: Ros 56
    Is it time to resolve this contradiction in the direction of aviation

    And the navy is worse?

    Navy is who? These are the ones that Tsushima did ... fuku? :-)
  17. 0
    3 September 2019 23: 25
    The bar and everything else is great! It is high time.
    General's question: why so dirty? Where is the new innovative radar absorbing coating, where is the culture of aviation production? Any manifestation of sloppiness is sloppiness. A shame!
  18. +1
    4 September 2019 10: 15
    If you upgrade, so all the remaining 60 sides, it will be more expedient, otherwise it will turn out to be assorted with different types of aircraft, and the Tu-22M3 is decently obsolete, modernization will at least for some time support their flight age and combat capabilities.
  19. +2
    4 September 2019 12: 11
    https://testpilot.ru/rossiya/tupolev/tu-22m3m/
    On the upgraded Tu-22M3 aircraft, the old PNA airborne radars will be replaced by new NV-45 radars manufactured by St. Petersburg OOO TsNPO Leninets. It is noted that this radar is a variant of the radar station PPS Novella-P38 of the IL-38N anti-submarine aircraft.
    Source: https://testpilot.ru/rossiya/tupolev/tu-22m3m/ Testers © www.testpilot.ru
    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/1828679.html
    Repair of systems and devices of Tu-22M3 aircraft No. 11105, 11102, 11205 and the fourth undergoing repairs with modernization [probably while at the defect stage] at KAZ them. S.P. Gorbunova
    Link to purchase No. 31603490426, link to download documentation
    For four cars undergoing repairs with modernization under the state contract concluded in 2016, the following were ordered:
    1) four NV-45 radars for 567 million rubles. at TsNPO "Leninets" with quarterly delivery in the 4th quarter of 2016. - Q3 2017
    Link to purchase No. 31603490262, link to download documentation
    2) four ed. U-001M [probably a modernized missile control system?] For 206 million rubles. from JSC "Arzamas Instrument-Making Plant"
    Link to purchase No. 31603402931, link to download documentation
    3) Eight INS-2000-04 inertial systems with the RM-71 mounting frame for 79,9 million rubles. from JSC "Ramenskiy instrument-making plant"
    Link to purchase No. 31603403032, link to download documentation
    4) Four interrogators of the state recognition system 623-3D-23 for 45 million rubles. from Kazan JSC "Radiopribor"
    Link to purchase No. 31603348457, link to download documentation
  20. 0
    4 September 2019 14: 01
    Waiting for the Tu-22m3MMM.
    1. 0
      4 September 2019 14: 41
      Where do you deliver?
      Cash only
  21. 0
    4 September 2019 19: 17
    Quote: VO3A
    the wing is small and also loaded with inverters, the fuselage is not bearing ...

    Oh, byadovaya byadovaya !!! What to do what what to do ??? Urgently give the kid a huge wing with a dry fuselage and a snow shovel !! Let him train to clean the snow, maybe as he grows up, he will adapt himself not to be a burden. And I will use the good old "Cs" with the old IAS. Maybe we will drive striped irons in the okyan seas.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    4 September 2019 19: 26
    Quote: sgrabik
    Yes and decently outdated Tu-22M3

    you yourself have answered the expediency of modernizing the entire fleet. What is the point of modernizing aircraft, which will be written off in 2-3 years after its completion. The "youngest" Tu-22M3 1993 and NSS 35 years
    1. 0
      5 September 2019 12: 43
      The B-52 is in the ranks of everything, including those that have been remotorized since 1958.
      Nobody is going to write them off for another 100 years.
      Oksti darling.
  23. +2
    5 September 2019 12: 42
    The cruising speed of the car is subsonic.
    The limit is 2500 km / h, it can fly at this speed for 10 minutes, then it will fall apart.
    The only dignity that can take on board enough ammunition. In order to fly somewhere with serious ammunition, you need refueling. The refueling bar costs 20 out of 160 vehicles. That is, 20 aircraft can actually carry out some combat missions. For a country like Russia, 20 planes are not zero, but not enough.
    What are they talking about? This, as my teacher said about musical instruments, is not an instrument, this is furniture.
  24. kig
    0
    11 October 2019 04: 57
    for self-defense, the bomber should not use weapons, but electronic or other countermeasures.
    - in my opinion, right. No fighter will come close enough, but try to hit a rocket from a cannon.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"