Military Review

Another shooting occurred in the USA amid softening the rules for carrying weapons

72
In the United States, the third massacre incident in the month of shooting occurred during the month. Five people were killed, about 20 injured.




In Texas, another massacre involving the use of a gunshot weapons. During the third such incident, at least five people died in a month.

The incident occurred on August 31 in the cities of Odessa and Midland, Texas. Starting September 1, the state enacts another law to soften the rules for carrying firearms. Moreover, in August this is the second massacre in the state. Coincidence?

The killing was not planned


At the same time, this tragedy was not planned in advance and had a spontaneous character. The fire was opened by a criminal whose car was stopped by the police during a random inspection.

It is known that having opened fire on police officers, the offender also began firing at civilians, after which he tried to escape. During the chase, he left the car and hijacked a mail van.

During the culmination of a shoot-out between law enforcement and a criminal near the Cinergy Cinema, the latter died: it is not specified whether he was killed by the police or committed suicide. At the moment, it is known that foreign citizens were not injured during the incident, the Russian Consulate General in Houston reported about this on Twitter.

The name of the killer has not yet been announced


The name of the killer is not reported. He only knows that he is about 30 years old, the name and surname of the deceased criminal have not yet been announced. According to reports, at least five Americans were killed, 21 people were injured, among them three law enforcement officers.

At least seven civilians are in critical condition, two more are in serious condition. Among the wounded - 2-year-old child. CNN, citing a Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman, Elizabeth Carter, said the fire was fired from an automatic rifle.

In August, the United States experienced three massacres with shooting. On August 3, in a Walmart chain store in El Paso, Texas, another criminal opened fire on people, killing 22 people, 8 of them were Mexican citizens. More than 20 civilians were injured, the attacker was detained.

The next day, a similar incident occurred in Ohio, in the city of Dayton. Then, during the incident, 9 people were killed and about 20 were injured.
72 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 1 September 2019 09: 22
    +9
    US-country shooting range ....
    1. Ross_ulair
      Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 09: 31
      +7
      But the right to defend oneself is legalized.
      And it is somewhat reckless to want conclusions that because of several loonies it is necessary to cancel this right
      1. Andrey Chistyakov
        Andrey Chistyakov 1 September 2019 09: 34
        +5
        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
        But the right to defend oneself is legalized.
        And it is somewhat reckless to want conclusions that because of several loonies it is necessary to cancel this right

        There are a lot of crazy people ..
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 1 September 2019 09: 45
          +10
          When a psycho shoots, but his victims - no, naturally, the victims will suffer.
          Three injured policemen - I think this is the same patrol that stopped him.
          It is not enough to have the right to carry a weapon - you also have to HAVE it, BE ABLE to use it and DO NOT BE AFRAID to use it.
          A crowd of several dozen, and no one psycho shot, they preferred to allow themselves to shoot with impunity. They allowed to escape - and then the cops shot him.

          I believe that at least half of this crowd will now carry weapons, and a quarter will also regularly train at the shooting range. But a third - on the contrary, will join the ranks of supporters of the strict ban on carrying weapons, as if it would save from loonies - they can do things with a hammer.
          1. Ross_ulair
            Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 10: 30
            +3
            Here is an analysis of one of the executions:


            Here are examples of civilians using military weapons to help the police (their citizenship and public consciousness are very strong, this cannot be taken away), and for self-defense:
            1. Shoots the wheel to prevent it from leaving (from the 4 minute)


            2. Shooting civilians to kill, after he blocked the car of the criminal with his car (from the 50 sec.)


            3. Self-defense of himself and the passenger, 1 shot, immediately tight. Even no one has brought charges (from 4.40 min.)


            4. Self-defense, too tightly on the basis of. Full excuse, even the trial did not reach (with 2.30 the main action and further analysis)


            And so that with these civilians we had something like this happen. How much would you crouch
        2. Ezekiel 25-17
          Ezekiel 25-17 1 September 2019 10: 11
          +1
          Compulsory treatment at Reagan was canceled ...
      2. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 1 September 2019 09: 36
        +3
        those. three mass executions are not an indicator at all, huh? per month?
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 1 September 2019 09: 40
          +8
          Quote: carstorm 11
          At the same time, this tragedy was not planned in advance and had a spontaneous character. The fire was opened by a criminal whose car was stopped by the police during a random check.


          Quote: carstorm 11
          those. three mass executions are not an indicator at all, huh? per month?

          Well, what does the "Law on Weapons" have to do with it?
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 1 September 2019 10: 25
            +3
            the man said early to draw conclusions. I answered that. about the law, this is not for me. give the opportunity to get weapons to the crowd, I think the height of idiocy.
            1. Adcapa
              Adcapa 1 September 2019 16: 34
              +3
              That's how many years the Russian Federation - Mother so much and this "wed ... time"
              give the opportunity to get weapons to the crowd, I think the height of idiocy.
              carstorm 11 and other proponents of "Deny" If you are discussing the news, then your comment is not in the cashier: READ
              Fire opened criminalwhose car was stopped by the police
              I selected the CRIMINAL .. ie. deliberately a scumbag with the capabilities of what has "legalize" weapons.
              I remember in the "dashing years" we stayed with a friend in Moscow, naturally with a bunch of trunks. I began to shove them under the bed and I "don't need to say". MOM NATIVE looked at six serious trunks ... It turns out they were driving. just rode - stopped the patrol (you see, honest ones got caught). In the process of detention - they did not even resist it - a man drove up and took the material evidence and then took him to his friend. just so wrapped in a blanket, threw it under the bed and said to lie there for a couple of weeks. We lay like that for several months (we often visited Moscow and checked). Why am I this - otherwise. that getting a "firearm" for a crime is "not a question" as well as its use. And practically anyone. over there in 404 recently 23mm ZUshka was detained at the border. and it is not necessary. they say it was dragged to the ferrous metal for a dozen lands. It’s good if the babakhs have this (it’s doubtful - through Poland, the route is inconvenient, it’s easier by sea to Turkey), but if in the middle of some “Oktoberfest” or during the storming of the house of a local “authority” ... In France (sale to the population is also prohibited), the police openly admit that in the slums on the hands of weapons, as it were, no more than in their department there, even to patrol specifically only natives of the locals are sent. so that it doesn't work out.
              1. Adcapa
                Adcapa 1 September 2019 17: 36
                +1
                Thus, my opinion is that all this "shooting" lies at least in the following planes 1: Crime - and this is a problem of the relevant authorities as inescapable as a human thirst for easy money (its plus (if I can say so) basically showdowns go among their own mowing thugs) will always be. but the more “prosperous” society is, the less it splashes out on the average person. 2: Psychiatry is an accidental, most often spontaneous phenomenon from which one cannot be insured. "Ku-kuha" can also go to a layman. and the bandit. and ... as we unfortunately saw - an employee of power structures. And for no apparent reason. 3: Society is the most frequent lately. directly related to clause 2 because it is difficult to make out where there is psychosis and where it is simply not a matter of morality. We have adopted the "Western" model of building society and education. and in it ... Any problem is solved with "fists" - an axiom that has been hammered into the subcortex since childhood. "Tom and Jerry": a downtrodden mouse is always ready to throw dynamite or shoot at a cat. The showdown ends only after the complete destruction of the house or with the arrival of the PSA / hostess. and the substitute from the side of the little one (why lie, dodge). "road runner" "Woody the woodpecker" they don't even "give out weapons" the villain himself brings his own death and not weak calibers. No brakes is the motto of the action. collateral losses are not important. I am silent about the "difficult child". Next is the school. a bunch of movies. Let's say "Be the first" (by the way, already the 2nd remake), a young man comes to school and shoots. what he does - right - goes to capoeira and the girl is against and she is already ready with the hero "even for hard labor" - live and rejoice. no. we kick off the opponent - happy end. Such films are like a blueprint for darkness. There is nothing to say about adult militants. everywhere the powerless police - O HOW - and the hero solves his problems with "fire and peace". It is clear why they only have 911 without 02 because the first are all-powerful "rescue service" (nothing is just the dispatching office they called that) and the second are corrupt or suckers ... or all together.
                1. Adcapa
                  Adcapa 1 September 2019 18: 55
                  +1
                  The result is a tandem: Confidence - power decides everything. and Confidence - there will be nothing for me. The first - I unfolded above - to be transferred to ANY sometimes completely insignificant problems and multiplied by youthful maximalism (There is no person no problem) leads to tragedy. The second is not only the lack of life experience but also the infantility inherent in adults as a result of juvenile education when children are absolutely unpunished. An adult is always wrong - this is how the system works. Problems and competition - NO. And when they all appear - catatonia. stupor. Inability and often unwillingness to OVERCOME lead to radical decisions. Beat. Suppose you even went to the section there they said they pulled themselves up 10 times. could not. They said come come on. tried it - hard. threw it away. resentment grows and then dad’s trunk catches my eye ...
                  We are all IMMORTAL an amazing but absolute truth. The overwhelming majority of people think so. "The car is far away" "I have walked this ladder 1000 times" - does it look like anything? Even the military in the battle "How so why didn’t I stick my head out?" Anything bad can happen ... just not to us. This is our universal creed.
                  Plus the "hero" complex, but nothing can happen to the hero. And at the end, he proudly walks into the sunset, embracing "her" - and then a sheet (with a nasty patter) with a listing of the articles of the Criminal Code violated by the SG "in progress" and the terms - and what. like on cigarettes. suddenly think.
                  And the last thing: the third factor has now been added to the above, which is very dangerous and especially for young people. Media presence - mass media including the Internet. almost instantly spread information around the world. This is not evil or good - it is a fact. And even if you are "caliph for an hour," but it's so tempting. and hero or antihero - the current mass culture and villains perfectly turns into charms. "Leon" is a killer ... a conscientious killer "Doberman" so why Keitel's character is a moral hoopoe but against the background of a cop ... "Adrenaline" "Carrier" "Fast and Furious" Statham has very cute Persians - interesting. and what were they doing before their paths with the mafia parted? .. the works of Guy Ritchie - there is no place to put a stigma here at all .. oh yes, a comedy ... a cut of society - in an interesting society we live, however. Moreover, everyone has one motive - close to everyone - “selfish interest” Pavka Korchagin. Elusive .. Timur with the team where are you?
                  Listening to this (even keeping quiet about the masterpieces of game development where the association with the character is several times higher), what do we expect? That the new generation will grow weed will be. but not for rabbits. What a complex ... mouth. anyone who wants to bask in the glory will not step over those around him - but simply "all means are good" and then write a book ... if he survives. hi
        2. Ross_ulair
          Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 10: 22
          +1
          I agree, dofiga turned out sad I feel sorry for people.
          But the statistics is such a thing - if nothing happens in the next couple of years, these shootings will be smeared with a thin layer. Or in the statistics for the second decade of the XXI century will fall.
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 1 September 2019 10: 48
            -3
            Well, in the states, probably in a day, thousands must die to begin to talk about it. we are different. for me, the presence of any weapon other than hunting among the civilian population is a prerequisite for such cases.
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 1 September 2019 11: 17
              +1
              Do you think the rest of the population is dumber than yourself?
              You propose to prohibit the right to manage your own life, but will a specially trained uncle dispose of it for a person?
            2. Simargl
              Simargl 1 September 2019 21: 49
              +1
              Quote: carstorm 11
              for me, the presence of any weapon other than hunting among the civilian population is a prerequisite for such cases.
              Tough nonsense! The Kerch shooter would explain.
        3. Blackmokona
          Blackmokona 1 September 2019 12: 22
          +4
          Of course, because the criminal will have weapons, you can ban only law-abiding citizens
        4. Simargl
          Simargl 1 September 2019 21: 47
          0
          Quote: carstorm 11
          those. three mass executions are not an indicator at all, huh? per month?
          In our city, and without the police and cops, they kill and rush people. Prohibit knives and axes?
      3. Evil543
        Evil543 1 September 2019 10: 34
        +2
        This self-defense just doesn't help them, and there are too many crazy people
        1. Ross_ulair
          Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 10: 41
          0

          Texas, meanwhile, continues to be one of the last bastions of Old America.
          After two executions, the Legislature decided to relax restrictions on the carrying of weapons in public places.
      4. APASUS
        APASUS 1 September 2019 17: 34
        0
        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
        But the right to defend oneself is legalized.

        But this rule doesn’t especially help them. As you look, all the dead arrows were neutralized by the police
        1. Ross_ulair
          Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 18: 00
          +3
          Quote: APASUS
          But this rule doesn’t especially help them. As you look, all the dead arrows were neutralized by the police


          A rather controversial statement, if we look at the statistics of incidents with shooting in general, without focusing on mass executions.
          It can be seen from the statistics for the first 8 months of the 19 year: 1015 cases of self-defense against 1338 cases of police shooting


          Here is the ratio of deaths from a gunshot, and the place of mass executions in it. It can be seen that at the level of statistical error (data for the 16 year)


          So self-defense is quite a place to be, and quite successful.
          1. APASUS
            APASUS 1 September 2019 18: 14
            0
            Quote: ROSS_Ulair
            So self-defense is quite a place to be, and quite successful.

            Everything is purely rude statistically:
            Boomstick in the USA
            The number of incidents -
            Killed -
            Wounded -
            etc.
            where in these statistics are numbers showing that the Americans came in handy at the time of the mass executions?
            1. Ross_ulair
              Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 18: 22
              +1
              Quote: APASUS
              ... where in these statistics are numbers showing that the Americans came in handy at the time of the mass executions?

              Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer? smile

              Quote: ROSS_Ulair
              A rather controversial statement, if we look at the statistics of incidents with shooting in general, without focusing on mass executions.

              Quote: ROSS_Ulair
              Here is the ratio of deaths from a gunshot, and the place of mass executions in it. It can be seen that at the level of statistical error (data for the 16 year)


              I seem to have written this, as well as indicated the number of deaths from mass executions.
              We are more likely to be hit at a pedestrian crossing
              1. APASUS
                APASUS 1 September 2019 20: 08
                0
                Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer?

                I again for the especially gifted hi :
                Where in these statistics are the facts that the Americans used weapons for self-defense during mass executions?
                Personal weapons in Las Vegas helped a lot when Stephen Paddock opened fire from Mandalay Bay Resort? There was just an arms exhibition in the hotel lobby, there were several trucks of weapons. This is of course an isolated case, but very significant
                1. Ross_ulair
                  Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 20: 32
                  +2
                  Quote: APASUS
                  I again for the especially gifted hi :

                  Thank you for recognizing my talents. laughing hi

                  I didn’t seem to say anywhere that during mass shootings, very often armed citizens liquidate the attacker.

                  Quote: APASUS
                  As you look, all the dead arrows were neutralized by the police

                  If the "shooters" mean exactly criminals in mass executions, then I misunderstood a little drinks

                  On the other hand, 5 min sitting in Google, found the same precedent:
                  https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2017/12/01/black-friday-schlenker-shooting-what-we-know/911335001/
                  The Black Friday Schlenker shooting: What we know

                  Here it was the armed citizens who prevented a possible mass execution. But since they prevented it, it falls into statistics precisely as self-defense.
                  But the case is very significant
                  1. APASUS
                    APASUS 2 September 2019 18: 22
                    +1
                    Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                    If the "shooters" mean exactly criminals in mass executions, then I misunderstood a little

                    The fact is that all the ideological inspirers of weapons for the population, namely personal protection, are positioned as the main argument. In this case, there can be no a priori mass executions in the USA, simply based on the source data.
                    1. Ross_ulair
                      Ross_ulair 2 September 2019 18: 28
                      +1
                      In the two comments above, I gave examples of how individuals successfully protect themselves - these are statistics for the first 8 months, and the prevention of execution in Florida.
                      What is wrong again? request
                      1. APASUS
                        APASUS 2 September 2019 18: 30
                        0
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        What is wrong again?

                        It's alright, I was just trying to get my point across
                      2. Ross_ulair
                        Ross_ulair 2 September 2019 18: 32
                        +1
                        So again I do not understand feel
                        drinks
                      3. APASUS
                        APASUS 2 September 2019 18: 35
                        0
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        So again I do not understand

                        All OK drinks
                      4. Ross_ulair
                        Ross_ulair 3 September 2019 10: 43
                        0
                        I didn’t pass, but because of the advantages I adjusted where I could hi
                      5. APASUS
                        APASUS 3 September 2019 18: 03
                        0
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        I didn’t pass, but because of the advantages I adjusted where I could hi

                        Shoutbox good
      5. General failure
        General failure 1 September 2019 19: 03
        -1
        But the right to defend oneself is legalized.

        It is not a problem to buy a bullet-proof vest and we have "no registration and SMS".
    2. Proxima
      Proxima 1 September 2019 09: 37
      +4
      I am not against the sale of weapons to individuals, but everything needs a measure. Why sell automatic weapons from which the lion's share of people suffer? Do you sell any smooth-bore or okay, rifled, but single-loading, he will shoot someone while drunk, but the victims in any case will be counted in units, not in dozens.
      1. Ross_ulair
        Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 10: 20
        +2
        Quote: Proxima
        I am not against the sale of weapons to individuals, but everything needs a measure. Why sell automatic weapons from which the lion's share of people suffer? Do you sell any smooth-bore or okay, rifled, but single-loading, he will shoot someone while drunk, but the victims in any case will be counted in units, not in dozens.

        So they kind of semi-automatic for civilians are allowed.
        Only the entire Internet is littered with rollers, how can these semi-automatic machines be switched to fully automatic mode, "with a slight movement of the hand" (c)
        And other rollers, how to assemble a muffler for any barrel from "manure and sticks"
      2. Ezekiel 25-17
        Ezekiel 25-17 1 September 2019 10: 20
        +2
        Quote: Proxima
        I am not against the sale of weapons to individuals, but everything needs a measure. Why sell automatic weapons from which the lion's share of people suffer? Do you sell any smooth-bore or okay, rifled, but single-loading, he will shoot someone while drunk, but the victims in any case will be counted in units, not in dozens.

        Automatic weapons are not sold there, so, semiautomatic devices ... As for the smooth-bore, sorry, but you are an optimist, the same Saiga is 20-30 meters more killer than the AR-15. And then, when there is intention, then there is preparation, as a rule, they take 2-3 units.
      3. Simargl
        Simargl 1 September 2019 21: 54
        0
        Quote: Proxima
        Why sell automatic weapons from which the lion's share of people suffer?
        In the USA there is no permission to carry automatic weapons.
        The energy of the AK bullet is about 2000 J, my smooth barrel has 3000 + J. True, from a smooth bullet, most likely, it will simply tear an animal the size of a person.
    3. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
      SERGEY SERGEEVICS 1 September 2019 10: 17
      0
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      US-country shooting range ....

      Yes, to them, about this, it was always somehow parallel and always loyal to this.
  2. Theodore
    Theodore 1 September 2019 09: 22
    +4
    For 55 years, they crumbled there, like a half million! In Civil, only 600 thousand! Significantly.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 1 September 2019 11: 19
      -3
      Only they still have the first world economy for 300 million people, and we have only 140.
      1. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor 1 September 2019 14: 13
        0
        Fascist Germany, too, had an excellent economy at one time, and also at the expense of others, they still cannot wash themselves.
        1. Simargl
          Simargl 1 September 2019 21: 59
          +2
          Quote: Incvizitor
          У fascist Germany, too, had an excellent economy at one time and also at the expense of others,
          When Germany was fascist, and according to what data was the economy of "fascist" Germany excellent?
      2. dvina71
        dvina71 1 September 2019 14: 20
        +2
        Quote: Mestny
        and the first world economy,

        This is doubtful .. Inflated GDP is not an indicator ..
        1. Ross_ulair
          Ross_ulair 1 September 2019 15: 29
          0
          But we have the most honest in the world. And we measure growth in fractions of a percent - an increase of one tenth of a holiday!
          It is especially piquant if you think about the fact that in the USSR growth was measured from the best indicators, and now from the worst.

          But not blown, yes
          1. dvina71
            dvina71 1 September 2019 16: 02
            +1
            Quote: ROSS_Ulair
            But we have the most honest in the world.

            Remind plizz .. when did the Russian Federation claim the dominance of the ball?

            Quote: ROSS_Ulair
            It is especially piquant if you think about the fact that in the USSR growth was measured from the best indicators, and now from the worst.

            It is especially juicy .. that in the USSR they were measured with RI arr. 1913 ..
  3. Plantagenet
    Plantagenet 1 September 2019 09: 24
    +6
    "There are no bad weapons, there are bad shooters."

    Kliment Voroshilov
  4. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 1 September 2019 09: 28
    +3
    CNN, citing a Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman, Elizabeth Carter, said the fire was fired from an automatic rifle.

    Not a short barrel, began to be ...
    1. novel66
      novel66 1 September 2019 09: 35
      +3
      with a short-barrel something else would be different !! culturally surrendered to the policemen and all, and this rifle brought to trouble ...
      1. sabakina
        sabakina 1 September 2019 09: 47
        0
        Novel, hi you're right, if he had a couple of Stechkins, would crumble everyone into a vinaigrette ...
    2. andrewkor
      andrewkor 1 September 2019 09: 40
      +1
      I agree with you, to put so many people, at least Ingram is needed!
      And to the victims and their relatives my sympathy!
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 September 2019 09: 40
    +2
    And if the fire was fired from a shotgun? At short distances, buckshot is terrible at all! This is about the prohibition of ownership of a short barrel, etc.
    And the short barrel didn’t help anyone. Police officers with pistols against an automatic rifle? I do not envy the cops.
  6. Kontrik
    Kontrik 1 September 2019 09: 41
    -3
    Something "advocates" of our free sale of arms keep quiet ..!
    1. zache
      zache 1 September 2019 09: 56
      -2
      I would definitely not entrust Mehan with any weapon .... For he is constantly under the "fly".
  7. Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 1 September 2019 09: 47
    +4
    I don’t understand ... what does the softening of the rules for carrying weapons mean? It’s not weapons that kill - people kill.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 1 September 2019 10: 28
      0
      by itself. only a person with and without arms is two different personalities in one body.
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 1 September 2019 11: 23
        0
        Not just with weapons, but with the right to use them, for example, to protect your loved ones.
        Such a person really does not look like ours. He is confident that he has the right to protect himself and his property.
        Ours is not responsible for anything, is not capable of initiative because everything is decided by the boss for him.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 1 September 2019 11: 39
          -4
          I didn’t say that. I said that a person changes after receiving a weapon. and most often in a very bad way. I saw it hundreds of times.
          1. Plantagenet
            Plantagenet 1 September 2019 12: 13
            +3
            I have owned weapons since 2000, I don’t know, maybe I have changed, but my relatives don’t notice.
          2. Simargl
            Simargl 1 September 2019 22: 03
            0
            Quote: carstorm 11
            I said that a person changes after receiving a weapon. and most often in a very bad way.
            Nobody noticed me. Mother-in-law - so for a couple of months I did not know that the trunk appeared in the house.
            Even the neighbor-dol ... the music fan does not know ...
  8. knn54
    knn54 1 September 2019 09: 48
    +2
    I could be wrong, but the shooting takes place in states where, among the population, a high% of Hispanics, African Americans, Chinese. Northern states are relatively "safe".
    1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
      SERGEY SERGEEVICS 1 September 2019 10: 00
      +1
      . Northern states are relatively "safe".

      In these states, there is a completely different policy in arms, more liberal.
  9. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 1 September 2019 09: 49
    +2
    Have they got there still wild west shooting?
    1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
      SERGEY SERGEEVICS 1 September 2019 10: 01
      +1
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Have they got there still wild west shooting?

      Well, especially in Texas, there almost all restrictions are lifted on weapons.
  10. Rwmos
    Rwmos 1 September 2019 10: 12
    -4
    The United States ceased to be able to shoot OUTSIDE the USA ... In Afghanistan, Syria or Iraq, where members of the Academy’s PMC repeatedly opened fire on unarmed miners. They began to shoot the peaceful people in their mattress - this can only be welcomed as part of the global community
  11. taiga2018
    taiga2018 1 September 2019 10: 51
    +1
    interestingly, they also have people who, after such cases, scream that this is because the system is rotten ...
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 1 September 2019 11: 27
      -1
      Of course they are. But because of the mentality, there are few of them. They are generally not inclined to shift failures to external circumstances. Only yourself. It turns out - well done. No - loshara.
      Everyone has what they deserve.
      It is almost impossible to imagine how we have a massive whining about "they should give us, but they didn't give us".
  12. Rostislav
    Rostislav 1 September 2019 10: 54
    +2
    How does this incident relate to the rules of carrying weapons if a criminal opened shooting while trying to believe his car?
  13. nobody111body
    nobody111body 1 September 2019 10: 56
    0
    villains that make loot arms sales did not care about killing niggas Latinos and Indians lizhby their own skin was intact, well want a "humane democracy" and to continue to be in the United States; and they also teach the whole world brotherhood and prosperity themselves disgrace - you can also cancel drugs than not "business"
  14. l.jensen
    l.jensen 1 September 2019 13: 53
    +2
    We (UK) collided with 3 cars this morning, drivers had a fight with knives and 1 death, one was wounded. The Weapons Act is strict, but in London several people are killed with knives every week. My wife is Swiss. There are a lot of rifles and machine guns at home in glass shafts. Not only her. Everyone has a lot of automatic weapons. The shooting range behind the village. Weekends, they go there with food and children, everyone shoots, and the children. There are no accidents. Many people of different ages. It happens that politicians come to such gatherings, communicate with people. They have no massacres. Probably the whole thing is in consciousness (or consciousness?). I remember once my wife answered - We do not have an army, the whole of Switzerland is an army. Maybe for a reason?
  15. Hokunin
    Hokunin 1 September 2019 15: 39
    -2
    Massacres in the United States is already their national tradition. And about the daily minor shootings of bandit groups, they don’t even mention it)))). The police do not call in the ghetto once again)))) because it will necessarily end with the murder of a black man and subsequent brainwashing and speeches)))). People are already howling about the ban on weapons, but the thoroughly corrupt US government wanted to spit on it, the arms lobby, they earn money from the deaths of their people))))
  16. Bookcase
    Bookcase 1 September 2019 17: 56
    0
    The aggressor country has its own social habits. The fact that in star-striped mode, people often kill each other is a consequence of politics and focusing on people and aggression.