Military Review

US forces claimed missile strike on militant base in Idlib

25
Middle Eastern media publish materials that talk about American military activity in Syria.


US forces claimed missile strike on militant base in Idlib


Thus, the Lebanese information service AMN claims that the Americans launched a missile strike on the outskirts of the Syrian city of Idlib (in the province of the same name), which houses a large base of jihadists of the Tahrir Hayyat al-Sham group (* the former Jebhat al-Nusra, banned in Russia ) and its affiliate Urras al-Din *. Dozens of militants eliminated.

It is claimed that the Americans struck using cruise missiles. If so, then this is the first American missile strike in the last few months on the territory of Syria. At the same time, the Pentagon has not yet commented on statements about striking at militants in Idlib.

At the same time, a number of other information resources of the Middle East write that the strike “could have been inflicted from one of the ships of the Russian Navy fleet". There is no specifics in this regard in the Middle East mass media. The Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet commented on this type of message.

Meanwhile, militant-controlled resources come out with materials that allow themselves to criticize Ankara. It is noted that "Erdogan decided to surrender territories in the province of Idlib after negotiations with Putin." Recall that a few days ago the Turkish president met with his Russian counterpart at the International Aviation and Space Salon, after which he stated that Turkey would consider buying a Su-57 fighter.
25 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Fanis
    Fanis 1 September 2019 08: 02
    +3
    Article puzzle - so who made the strike with cruise missiles, Americans or Russians?
    1. Boomandroid
      Boomandroid 1 September 2019 08: 06
      0
      Quote: Fanis
      Article puzzle - so who made the strike with cruise missiles, Americans or Russians?

      We'll find out everything later, it seems to me that it’s ours, or maybe pocket barmaley have lost their hands, that the belt had to be pulled out ... Or so they flipped over an empty building, like, well, we are fighting.
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 1 September 2019 10: 20
        +2
        But it’s worth considering who CANNOT strike this blow.
        Syrians - they do not have cruise missiles. Turkey - in this war they have not used cruise missiles yet. Israel - this bombing only ISIS opponents. Saudis - these will not bomb those in whom Iran is fighting. Iran - if he launched rockets, he would not be silent, and the Americans would have definitely detected the launch, and the media would have already spoken about this.
        1. Nicholas C.
          Nicholas C. 1 September 2019 11: 29
          +2
          The news came yesterday.
          The reason may be as follows. Erdogan is actively suppressing the United States on the issue of creating a "safe zone" in Syria from the left bank of the Euphrates, they say, if we do not agree on a certain day, then our troops will enter without any agreements. A missile strike is like a warning. In this regard, the submission of material from the BBC is very curious: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49538528
      2. Labrador
        Labrador 1 September 2019 11: 19
        0
        If the Americans, then most likely buried documents or multi-knowledge. If ours, then just work.
    2. U-58
      U-58 1 September 2019 08: 55
      +2
      Most notably, we and the necromancers are equally interested in clicking on the nose of Recep al-Tayyip.
      Moreover, the bases are diametrically opposite, but the result is one ...
      1. den3080
        den3080 1 September 2019 11: 52
        0
        Quote: U-58
        Most notably, we and the necromancers are equally interested in clicking on the nose of Recep al-Tayyip.
        Moreover, the bases are diametrically opposite, but the result is one ...

        Fasting (quote) reminded me of Vysotsky’s song smile
        [media = https: //youtu.be/jMdxOsB9bEc]
    3. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 1 September 2019 11: 08
      +1
      Quote: Fanis
      Puzzle article

      Our Ministry of Defense reports that it was the mattresses that were slammed without notifying either us or the Turks. Hmm, striped all in the winners are torn at the "distribution of hats".
    4. ilimnoz
      ilimnoz 1 September 2019 11: 09
      0
      if it’s decided to pour a gasoline into the fire then very on time. Erdogan is probably cornered.
    5. g1v2
      g1v2 1 September 2019 12: 51
      +2
      The Americans. Removed several field commanders htsh. They have already done this several times since they were 16. Apparently they are cleaning their tails. By the way, Benya Laden himself once went to the tsar until they decided to write him off to expense in Bosnia. The result is known.
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 1 September 2019 13: 15
        0
        Quote: g1v2
        Apparently they are cleaning their tails.

        It is logical, because tails have long tongues. yes
        1. g1v2
          g1v2 1 September 2019 13: 29
          +1
          In 15 or 16, there was a Senate hearing about where the $ 500 million allocated for training and equipping "the Syrian opposition fighting against the ISIS" went. And the Pentagon spokesman there, turning pale and stammering, said that the Pentagon had trained 500 people for $ 4 million. Ours trolled them for a long time. But the general simply could not openly say that several thousand Al Qaeda fighters were trained for jabhat al Nusra with these $ 500 million. Now it is Hayat Tahrir ash sham (htsh). New York police and firefighters' unions might not have been overly happy to hear that their taxes were being used by the militants of the organization that killed dozens of their colleagues.
          Again, this infa in the conditions of political splinter in the states can be used for courts and showdowns between Democrats and Republicans. No body, no business. request
  2. ML-334
    ML-334 1 September 2019 08: 04
    0
    If the losses were among the Syrian army, then definitely the Americans.
  3. knn54
    knn54 1 September 2019 08: 05
    +1
    The main thing is that the blow was dealt to pro-Turkish militants.
    1. Every
      Every 1 September 2019 08: 49
      +1
      Quote: knn54
      The main thing is that the blow was dealt to pro-Turkish militants.

      And thus, hinting to the Turks what could happen to friends if they have their own opinion. Or maybe just petty revenge.
      Although, in general, a strange situation. Usually, after such strikes, the involved party starts screaming about their victories as soon as possible. And here, silence.
      1. Kontrik
        Kontrik 1 September 2019 09: 00
        0
        Quote: Every
        And thus, hinting to the Turks what could happen to friends if they have their own opinion. Or maybe just petty revenge.

        In the right direction, think .. Most likely it is! No matter how much more serious provocation there was. USA-Israel can’t even think about Turkey-Russia alliance. Hope our intelligence services are on the alert?
  4. Vladimir_6
    Vladimir_6 1 September 2019 09: 04
    0
    Well, the news.
    US forces claimed missile strike on militant base in Idlib

    At the same time, the Pentagon has not yet commented on statements about striking at militants in Idlib.

    The Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet commented on this type of message.

    And in the appendage:
    Recall that a few days ago the Turkish president met with his Russian counterpart at the International Aviation and Space Salon, after which he stated that Turkey would consider buying a Su-57 fighter.
  5. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
    SERGEY SERGEEVICS 1 September 2019 09: 04
    0
    If so, then they have done at least one right thing in recent times, thereby destroying the base of militants.
  6. bbtcs
    bbtcs 1 September 2019 09: 16
    -1
    They bark at each other, but the enemy turns out to be one?
    Yes, some Turks ....
    Complicated.
    Boredom.
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 1 September 2019 10: 07
    0
    Striped decided to help our videoconferencing, what would it be?
  8. askort154
    askort154 1 September 2019 10: 19
    0
    The Americans could not strike at their "fosterlings".
    They, and all Western media, call them not terrorists, but "opposition to the Assad regime." The howl of the "white helmets" will begin soon.
  9. Vkd dvk
    Vkd dvk 1 September 2019 10: 26
    0
    Quote: Every
    Quote: knn54
    The main thing is that the blow was dealt to pro-Turkish militants.

    And thus, hinting to the Turks what could happen to friends if they have their own opinion. Or maybe just petty revenge.
    Although, in general, a strange situation. Usually, after such strikes, the involved party starts screaming about their victories as soon as possible. And here, silence.

    There is nothing strange here. Both sides (Russia and the USA) benefit from terrorists thinking on others, and fearing and trying to answer. Substrate in its purest form. Retraction into active hostilities and description later in atrocities against civilians.
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 September 2019 11: 21
    0
    Zone controlled by Turkey. It is possible that the Americans struck to once again show Erdogan that he should not have bought the S-400 and moved closer to Russia. It is doubtful that, in another case, they would be hit by the rockets they fed.
    1. protoss
      protoss 1 September 2019 12: 11
      0
      the blow was not against the pro-Turkish, but against the irreconcilable from htsh (julani and ko). they are primarily not convenient for the Turks themselves, because they are high-handed and poorly execute orders (it is affected by the fact that under the control of the Turks they did not voluntarily transfer from the Saudis). but at the same time, the Turks need them as cannon fodder, but for another war. the Turks have long convinced them to move to Libya all together, but so far relatively few militants have been taken there.
      therefore, the Turks themselves, for image reasons, cannot eliminate the top of the htsh (the most intractable), because of which the main problem is. such things are outsourced to the "wrong".
  11. ddmitrij
    ddmitrij 1 September 2019 11: 55
    0
    the Central Command of the US Armed Forces stated that they attacked Al-Qaida * positions in the Syrian city of Idlib.

    RT writes