The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on

153
Russian cosmonauts on the ISS could hardly turn on the power supply delivered to the station Robot "Fedor". This became clear from the negotiations between the ISS and the Mission Control Center.

The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on




Russian cosmonauts Aleksey Ovchinin and Alexander Skvortsov performed the “revitalization” of the Fedor robot delivered to the ISS by the Soyuz MS-14 spacecraft. At the same time, Skvortsov, being in the Zvezda module, put on an exoskeleton that allows him to control the robot, and Ovchinin went to the Search module, where the robot was installed to turn on the power and check the work of Fedor. As it became clear from the negotiations, it was difficult to turn on the robot.

Maybe, hit it with a hammer (the power button on the robot’s shoulder - approx.) With a hammer? I already took a wrench, I rest - no effect

- asked Ovchinin, to which experts from the MCC have suggested changing the battery of the robot.

However, after some time, the robot still managed to start without changing the batteries.

I turned it on. Time ten-fifteen turned on and off. So he turned on and even said something

- said the astronaut.

After turning on the Fedor, Skvortsov, remotely controlling him, said that he could see perfectly through the eyes of the robot. Subsequently, under the control of an astronaut, the robot worked with a screwdriver, keys and electrical connectors.

Earlier it was reported that the Fedor robot will remain on the ISS until September 7. During this time, he will conduct a series of experiments aimed at the ability of the mechanism to work with various tools, including small ones. In the future, it is assumed that the robot will be used to repair mechanisms and components in places dangerous for a person.
  • Roskosmos
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

153 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +34
    31 August 2019 08: 32
    A couple more photos

    [/ Center]
    1. +29
      31 August 2019 08: 48
      No matter what, God forbid, God did not begin to establish his orders on the ISS, suddenly he’s interposing. belay
      1. +33
        31 August 2019 09: 08

        Fedor still cannot come to his senses, after the flight and unsuccessful docking, and they are with his hammer!


        1. +7
          31 August 2019 15: 34
          Quote: bulvas
          they are hammering it!

          And a wrench. Classics ... Fedya succeeded in such a "registration" - they immediately explained that they had to obey. laughing
      2. +20
        31 August 2019 09: 25
        Yes, if only they could turn it off, otherwise who knows ... lol feel
        1. +16
          31 August 2019 10: 04
          The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on

          Quote: DEPHIHTO
          Yes, if only they could turn it off, otherwise who knows ... lol feel

          "Uriy, Uriy, find where his button is!" ("The Adventures of Electronics")
          1. -2
            31 August 2019 10: 09
            Quote: Starover_Z
            The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on

            Quote: DEPHIHTO
            Yes, if only they could turn it off, otherwise who knows ... lol feel

            "Uriy, Uriy, find where his button is!" ("The Adventures of Electronics")

            No, not like that. There was such an old joke about Electronics- ,, URRI-URRI, WHERE A BUTTON ?? URRI WHERE THE BUTTON-OH-HEY-TOLERANT (censored) .. YOUR MAAAAT !!!! ,, (s) laughing
          2. +13
            31 August 2019 11: 47
            I will explain how it really was:
            The robot Fedor has two buttons. ON button on the forehead and OFF button on the back
            between the shoulder blades. So that I could not reach and turn off myself.
            But in the Palace of Pioneers mixed wires. The astronaut pressed 15 times
            button on the forehead, and it was turning off the robot!
            The astronaut became angry and lightly (but from the heart) knocked Fedor wooden
            a mallet on the back. And hit the OFF button good which is ON good
            The robot spoke up. That was joy!
        2. +3
          31 August 2019 10: 09
          Quote: DEPHIHTO
          Yes, if only they could turn it off, otherwise who knows ... lol feel

          No matter how "ON" and "OFF" turned out to be different buttons ... wink This is not a vacuum cleaner ...
      3. +2
        31 August 2019 09: 55
        Quote: Spartanez300
        No matter what, God forbid, God did not begin to establish his orders on the ISS, suddenly he’s interposing.

        No, just Leading a guy with a temper, showed his character and "Who's the boss."
      4. +9
        31 August 2019 09: 56
        Quote: Spartanez300
        all of a sudden

      5. +2
        31 August 2019 10: 53
        Weapons were not delivered to the ISS, so only if boxing ...
        1. +1
          2 September 2019 14: 35
          Nichche - he will make a couple of multiply charged slingshots from the trash and begin to "bend" everyone in Macedonian style.
      6. -1
        31 August 2019 21: 05
        In the future, when Fedya is knitted on a rope overboard, there will be no entrance to the ISS))))) they did not know where to put this miracle of engineering, so that the eye would not be an exigent to the average man. Eureka, let's send the Fedya into orbit, and write it off bored eyes)))))
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            31 August 2019 23: 49
            So he is there now, from there he writes
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      7. +1
        1 September 2019 09: 20
        If Fedor decides to take over some planet? Russia Crimea has grown and Mars will be added
  2. +18
    31 August 2019 08: 33
    Uri, Uri, look for the button ..! But there’s no button .. (x \ f Electronics)
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +8
      31 August 2019 08: 56
      As for the button ... On the remote control of critical mechanisms (in power plants in particular), you can click on "open-close" with a certain effort ... What would be time to think, and am I doing the right thing?
      1. +4
        31 August 2019 09: 18
        Quote: 210ox
        About the button.

        Just like in the movie Adventure Electronics

        But why in zero-gravity the robot legs is really a mystery.
        1. +19
          31 August 2019 09: 24
          Quote: Vita VKO
          But why in zero-gravity the robot legs is really a mystery
          It’s a pity that our kulibins did not provide another function
        2. KCA
          +3
          31 August 2019 09: 34
          It’s probably easier for a person to control an android than any caterpillar
        3. +2
          31 August 2019 10: 14
          Quote: Vita VKO
          But why in zero-gravity the robot legs is really a mystery.
          Do you know that armless people do a lot with their feet? Including eat? I know? And there are mattresses, with drills and screwdrivers, what if they unscrew something? laughing
          1. +7
            31 August 2019 10: 26
            Quote: sabakina
            Quote: Vita VKO
            But why in zero-gravity the robot legs is really a mystery.
            Do you know that armless people do a lot with their feet? Including eat? I know? And there are mattresses, with drills and screwdrivers, what if they unscrew something? laughing

            Legs are not superfluous laughing
        4. 0
          9 September 2019 20: 29
          And who will go to Mars?
  3. -18
    31 August 2019 08: 34
    He is not "Fedor" at all, but some kind of "abryvyatur" non-Russian chock. laughing
    1. -4
      31 August 2019 09: 06
      And besides, he was almost drowned like a pissed kitten, so he probably fell into a temporary "coma" from the feeling of fear awakened in him.
    2. -2
      31 August 2019 10: 08
      Quote: Amateur
      He is not "Fedor" at all, but some kind of "abryvyatur" non-Russian chock. laughing

      Just Russian exactly .. NO WE HAVE BUTTONS and will not have !!! We are such a nation and a millennial state (and maybe more) hi
      1. -1
        31 August 2019 10: 12
        Just Russian

        FEDOR - Final Experimental Demonstration Object Research

        What about the button?
        1. +1
          31 August 2019 11: 34
          Quote: Amateur
          Just Russian

          FEDOR - Final Experimental Demonstration Object Research

          What about the button?

          This abbreviation is for western inhabitants ...
          But the Russians don’t have a button, like Fedor! wassat

          He still knows how to swear in difficult situations ... drinks
          1. +1
            31 August 2019 12: 58
            Fedor, this is just for the domestic electorate, and the official designation of the product: "Skybot F-850" for the rest of the world))

            So thank you for not "T-800"
            1. 0
              31 August 2019 13: 38
              Quote: yehour
              "Skybot F-850" for the rest of the world))

              So thank you for not "T-800"
              -Do you think someone will immediately draw a parallel with the Terminator?
              1. +3
                31 August 2019 22: 13
                I think that they feared only for the copyright, because the parallels are obvious: Fedor is already shooting with two hands in Macedonian, and "Skybot" is very suspiciously correlated with "SkyNet" :)
                1. 0
                  1 September 2019 19: 59
                  Quote: yehour
                  I think that they feared only for the copyright, because the parallels are obvious: Fedor is already shooting with two hands in Macedonian, and "Skybot" is very suspiciously correlated with "SkyNet" :)
                  -they have a copyright term in films of either 25 or 30 years
          2. +1
            1 September 2019 09: 21
            Lacks earflaps and ak47 on the shoulder
            1. +1
              1 September 2019 09: 53
              Quote: Clever man
              Lacks earflaps and ak47 on the shoulder

              Well, in Hollywood, I think we have already started shooting a blockbuster film about how Robot Fedor captured the ISS and is demanding the restoration of the USSR .. wassat
          3. 0
            9 September 2019 20: 31
            Floors are even very simple without commas.
      2. +4
        31 August 2019 14: 23
        Quote: Kontrik
        We are such a nation and a millennial state (and maybe more)

        Before Peter I, we had a different calendar (from the Creation of the World), now 2011 according to the old calendar corresponds to 7519-7520. But after Peter I, another grand reform was carried out. He abolished the patriarchate, subjugating the Christian church to the state, in fact became its head. Peter I in the summer of 7208 from the Creation of the World introduced the Christian calendar on the lands of Moscow Russia. In one instant, in the literal sense of the word, the summer of 7208 from the Creation, at the request of Peter, turned into 1700 from the Birth of Christ. Thus, 5508 years of their history were stolen from the Russians. Therefore, Russian statehood is much more than a thousand years old.
        1. -2
          31 August 2019 17: 15
          Quote: Tersky
          Quote: Kontrik
          We are such a nation and a millennial state (and maybe more)

          Before Peter I, we had a different calendar (from the Creation of the World), now 2011 according to the old calendar corresponds to 7519-7520. But after Peter I, another grand reform was carried out. He abolished the patriarchate, subjugating the Christian church to the state, in fact became its head. Peter I in the summer of 7208 from the Creation of the World introduced the Christian calendar on the lands of Moscow Russia. In one instant, in the literal sense of the word, the summer of 7208 from the Creation, at the request of Peter, turned into 1700 from the Birth of Christ. Thus, 5508 years of their history were stolen from the Russians. Therefore, Russian statehood is much more than a thousand years old.

          Calendar from the creation of the world, as I understand it, the Russians appeared along with the creation of the world according to you? laughing Here I have doubts about the existence of Russians even during the earthly life of Jesus, and you are threatening the existence of Russians 7000 years ago.
          1. +1
            31 August 2019 19: 09
            Quote: Semurg
            Calendar from the creation of the world, as I understand it, the Russians appeared along with the creation of the world according to you?

            Semug, did you learn Russian bad at school? Or did they begin to put a punctuation mark in front of the bracket in Russian, which itself is the most powerful punctuation mark? It's about a calendar, a report from which was from the Creation of the World, and not from the appearance of the Russians at the time of its creation. Reread again taking into account the signs, it may come. And the other 6 followers will not hurt to repeat the material passed, unless of course they passed it.
            1. 0
              1 September 2019 09: 52
              Tersky, 5508 years of their history were stolen from the Russians, according to your text. So I'm fine with an understanding of Russian texts, this is a fantastic deepening of Russian history for you. So it will cling to punctuation marks when stupidity is blurted out in its text.
              1. +2
                1 September 2019 10: 07
                Quote: Semurg
                So I'm fine with an understanding of Russian texts,

                Judging by how you understood, the problems are clearly taking place. Did you learn to distort one pretty well-known nationality? I answered this phrase
                Quote: Semurg
                Calendar from the creation of the world, as I understand it, the Russians appeared along with the creation of the world according to you?
                And you suffered over the bumps:
                Quote: Semurg
                it’s your fantastic deepening of Russian history.
                Well, yes, we, the Russians, didn’t stand with the Kazakhs. Google at your leisure the theme of the emergence of Russia, well, or re-read the story for grade 4 ... Yes
                1. 0
                  1 September 2019 10: 21
                  Yeah, in the history of the 4th grade it is written about the 5000 year history of the Russians.
          2. +3
            31 August 2019 20: 59
            creation of the world is the conclusion of a peace treaty
    3. -1
      31 August 2019 10: 36
      Quote: Amateur
      He is not "Fedor" at all, but some kind of "abryvyatur" non-Russian chock

      In order to have no doubts about whose it is ROBERT, a flag was inserted into his paw, which brought the car into an indescribable "delight and a sense of pride", which went off scale all the emotional and scamper tolerances ... In the end - stupor! laughing
      But here are some very interesting arguments from the former head of Roscosmos:
      1. +4
        31 August 2019 14: 24
        Well, this is the very Lopot who was attacked for corruption!
        Well then, yes, his opinion is extremely objective. For skakuasov fits perfectly.
        1. -4
          31 August 2019 21: 10
          Constantly mention skakuasov, Ukraine, maydaunov, etc. This, I'm sorry, is written in the training manual? winked
          Not tired? Or is it something deeply personal with Ukraine?
          1. +1
            31 August 2019 21: 16
            Quote: Beringovsky
            Constantly mention skakuasov,

            Because, for example, I have personally acquaintances there ... from the series - "why did you attack us?" belay

            Quote: Beringovsky
            Or is it something deeply personal with Ukraine?

            It’s like you have ... personal wink
  4. +9
    31 August 2019 08: 35
    Good photo .. Of course, this device is difficult to call a robot. But the understudy of a person, his hands, designed to work in an aggressive environment, is suitable.
    1. +12
      31 August 2019 08: 45
      Quote: 210ox
      Good photo .. Of course, this device is difficult to call a robot. But the understudy of a person, his hands, designed to work in an aggressive environment, is suitable.

      Consumer society rules. We call artificial intelligence any technique that works according to the program. And the remote devices are robots. At least take on new terms.
      Recently, a good movie on this topic has been released, my personal assessment of 7 from 10. The budget is modest, but well taken off, and the ending is still good
      1. 0
        31 August 2019 08: 57
        The beginning is interesting, and then the film rolls down, the ending is generally dregs like "Cloverfield 10" and the whole film is somewhat reminiscent of it.
        1. +1
          31 August 2019 09: 02
          Quote: loki565
          The beginning is interesting, and then the film rolls down, the ending is generally dregs like "Cloverfield 10" and the whole film is somewhat reminiscent of it.

          Well, now there is so little classic fiction in the movies, mostly comics also shoot fantasy films. There is nothing else. Our cinema generally ignores this since the collapse of the USSR. Bondarchuk does not count))
          1. -31
            31 August 2019 09: 22
            And what is wrong with Bondarchuk?
            Fiction takes off at the level of people watching.
            Or the head of the sect Goblin forbade to watch?
            1. +23
              31 August 2019 09: 38
              Is this where Bald has good fiction? Parody of "Inhabited Island" or "Gopota vs. Alien"?
              1. +1
                31 August 2019 09: 59
                Quote: garri-lin
                Parody of "Inhabited Island" or "Gopota vs. Alien"?

                I agree, you can’t name good, rather mediocre below.
                1. +2
                  31 August 2019 10: 04
                  Disposable. I’ve strained myself with good science fiction. Although there is "Out of the car" but alas, it is the west. But the film is strong. Much closer to Philip Dick than Blade Runner 2.
              2. -16
                31 August 2019 14: 26
                Quote: garri-lin
                Is this where Bald has good fiction? Parody of "Inhabited Island" or "Gopota vs. Alien"?

                It is she.
                Quite fantastic, at the level. There is, of course, a certain touch of the Soviet theater school, but overall not bad. Much better than the reenactment articles about the war "28 it is not clear who".
                1. +9
                  31 August 2019 14: 51
                  Just the same 28 heroic fighters most of all resemble the theatrical production of the Soviet school with well, very good props. The film is not without cons, of course, but good. And the Inhabited Island is a cut from the heirloom science fiction for staging scenes, props for costumes, it smells like: Equalibrium. The fifth element. Derivatives of Mad Max. And much more. When I looked, I noted, but over the years I forgot. The Strugatsky brothers must have been waiting for Fedya. Although the main message of the book in the film is preserved. But for people who are not familiar with It is difficult to be a god, he will be difficult to understand.
      2. +3
        31 August 2019 09: 19
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Recently, a good movie on this topic has been released, my personal assessment of 7 from 10. The budget is modest, but well taken off, and the ending is still good

        I do not know. In my opinion, today even Hollywood is not able to give out something worthwhile. I had a video cassette with a good movie. There is something to see and think about ...
        1. +1
          31 August 2019 09: 27
          Quote: sabakina
          I do not know. In my opinion, today even Hollywood is not able to give out something worthwhile. I had a video cassette with a good movie. There is something to see and think about.

          Hi hi
          Look for the movie "Short Circuit" It seems like 88 years old.
          I watched several times, I liked
    2. +2
      31 August 2019 09: 11
      I wonder how he has thermoregulation, in outer space, on his "body" there will be brutal temperature drops or he will also be dressed in a spacesuit?
      1. 0
        31 August 2019 09: 59
        Currently not intended for use in outer space
        1. -1
          31 August 2019 10: 19
          Quote: BlackMokona
          Currently not intended for use in outer space

          Captain. spacesuit has not yet created!
  5. +6
    31 August 2019 08: 35
    debugging a device in space is not an easy task.
    1. +1
      31 August 2019 08: 48
      Quote: Antares
      debugging a device in space is not an easy task

      It’s not easy everywhere. While you find, while you realize, while you do ...
      You will endure all the nerves. And if time is running out, they’re standing over the soul ...
      Milk for harmfulness must be issued laughing
      1. +2
        31 August 2019 09: 05
        Quote: Lipchanin
        It’s not easy everywhere.

        And many things on Earth cannot even be verified. One problem cooling electronics is worth. In zero gravity, convection cooling does not work. Therefore, the station has such a huge number of fans. And embed the fans in the robot ... winked I’m not saying if, moreover, it is designed to work in a vacuum without a spacesuit.
        1. 0
          31 August 2019 09: 13
          Quote: Cube123
          And many things on Earth cannot even be verified. One problem cooling electronics is worth. In zero gravity, convection cooling does not work.

          I’m talking about the fact that even in space, that on the earth you need to think very hard with your head. A malfunction, it is a malfunction and it must be sought.
          Yes, the environment affects the number of options that need to be checked, but the brains must be fully included everywhere wink
        2. -1
          31 August 2019 09: 42
          Is it intended? They did it for the Ministry of Emergencies.
      2. +5
        31 August 2019 09: 56
        Quote: Lipchanin
        While you find, while you realize, while you do ...
        You will endure all the nerves. And if time is running out, they’re standing over the soul ...

        And if, moreover, a button with protection against accidental pressing, which must be held pressed for a few seconds, and not waving impatiently with a wrench ... wink
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -4
      31 August 2019 10: 22
      What for? Rogozin also watched Terminator 2, does he need it? The piece of iron will return to the ground and will pursue him.
      The smart ones are not needed, the faithful are needed.
  7. +20
    31 August 2019 08: 45
    And it was necessary to blow the whole world that the robot did not immediately turn on?

    Especially with a wrench. Maybe someone forgot the movie Armageddon, where our astronaut was shown a drunken idiot in earflaps and solving technical problems with a wrench. If then it was possible to smile sadly from this nonsense, then now it’s somehow not very funny. It turns out that the Americans in Hollywood were right chtol?
    1. +8
      31 August 2019 08: 54
      Quote: Voyager
      And it was necessary to blow the whole world that the robot did not immediately turn on?

      Especially with a wrench. Maybe someone forgot the movie Armageddon, where our astronaut was shown a drunken idiot in earflaps and solving technical problems with a wrench. If then it was possible to smile sadly from this nonsense, then now it’s somehow not very funny. It turns out that the Americans in Hollywood were right chtol?

      It also cut, and even wanted to write such a comment. Then I thought: "How can I change the Russian habit of kissing in front of the West with just one comment?" And this is not how the American media write, but ours. Of course, more and more people will look towards America.
      1. +2
        31 August 2019 11: 05
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        kiss the West? "

        laughing Colleague! let's clarify: - what did you want to tell us !? wassat
        1. If: "" kiss BEFORE ... West "- then" this "- a perversion! lol
        2. If: "FUCK in front of the West" - then you need to read what "comes out" from under the keyboard! And not to let the fountain of thoughts go on its own, so that people like me would be teased over it! Yes
        You need to be more attentive and careful to read the "keyboard", releasing it on the Internet! drinks
        Good luck!
    2. +7
      31 August 2019 09: 06
      Quote: Voyager
      And it was necessary to blow the whole world that the robot did not immediately turn on?

      Especially with a wrench. Maybe someone forgot the movie Armageddon, where our astronaut was shown a drunken idiot in earflaps and solving technical problems with a wrench. If then it was possible to smile sadly from this nonsense, then now it’s somehow not very funny. It turns out that the Americans in Hollywood were right chtol?

      Hmm, maybe right. Only, in my opinion, it’s better drunk, with a hammer, but the device worked than a sober one, graduated from Oxward, but nothing worked.
      By the way, in Armageddon, the Russian astronaut is shown, of course, drunk and with earflaps, but not an idiot. And remember how valiant Americans, in the same film, a stuck drill unlocked. It seems also not due to high technology.
      1. +2
        31 August 2019 09: 37
        Quote: Eragon
        Only, in my opinion, it’s better drunk, with a hammer, but the device worked than a sober one, graduated from Oxward, but nothing worked.

        One familiar woman told. It has long been, in the last century.
        The heating battery has leaked. They called the ZhEK, called a plumber. A young man came, cleanly dressed, sober, in his hands a "diplomat" with an instrument. He spoke competently, without swearing. After about 25 minutes I finished my work, said goodbye, and left. After 40 minutes it started flowing again in the same place. They called again. By the end of the day, another plumber arrived. Drunk and not entirely clean. Without taking off his shoes, something muttering under his breath went to the battery. Dug for about 15 minutes. Silently left. The battery no longer leaked
    3. 0
      31 August 2019 09: 17
      Quote: Voyager
      And it was necessary to blow the whole world that the robot did not immediately turn on?

      And no one trumpeted.
      This became clear from the negotiations of the ISS and the Mission Control Center.

      Interception of negotiations came to reporters.
      Now you can intercept everything. Moreover, this is not a closed line.
      1. +2
        31 August 2019 10: 12
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Interception of negotiations came to reporters.

        One and the same event can be described in different ways.
        By the way, in Runet, the first about "Fedor did not turn on" began to trumpet on "Echo of Moscow".
    4. +3
      31 August 2019 10: 20
      Then everyone cites striped ones as an example, which supposedly speak both of failures and of luck in the open. Now for some reason they told me about the key. It’s time to decide what to talk about and what to keep quiet about.
    5. 0
      31 August 2019 10: 43
      Quote: Voyager
      And it was necessary to blow the whole world that the robot did not immediately turn on?

      Tradition, since imperial times.
  8. +9
    31 August 2019 08: 52
    Impersonate a robotic arm?
    1. 0
      31 August 2019 09: 12
      Quote: knn54
      Impersonate a robotic arm?

      Nobody gives out. Just two modes of operation: stand-alone (robot) and remotely controlled (manipulator). Option Terminator (which movie) is still at the stage of technical specifications.
  9. +3
    31 August 2019 09: 01
    But he turned on, you won’t get spoiled for ours, otherwise a sledgehammer and a wrench will go into business with some kind of mother. laughing
  10. -7
    31 August 2019 09: 04
    It was necessary to launch GDP. He would immediately turn it on. Or maybe ...
    1. +1
      31 August 2019 09: 16
      Quote: sergo1914
      It was necessary to launch GDP. He would immediately turn it on. Or maybe ...

      What time! The gross domestic product into the pipe, it was the case, it was already flying out, but into space ...
      1. +1
        31 August 2019 11: 17
        Quote: Eragon
        Inner shaftsоth product into the pipe ...

        Well, you waved !!! Only 3 billion rubles!
        And this, apparently, is not the limit: behind robotics is the future of unmanned space exploration ..
        1. +1
          1 September 2019 09: 28
          Quote: BoA KAA
          Quote: Eragon
          Inner shaftsоth product into the pipe ...

          Well, you waved !!! Only 3 billion rubles!
          And this, apparently, is not the limit: behind robotics is the future of unmanned space exploration ..

          Thanks (gross) hi
          Speaking about "into the pipe", I meant the economic catastrophe after the collapse of the USSR. It’s not 3 billion, but, as it were, not 3 trillion, but in dollars.
  11. +4
    31 August 2019 09: 24
    I turned it on. Time ten-fifteen turned on and off. So he turned on and even said something... I even guess the approximate content of this "something"! But, alas, I have no right, according to the rules of the site, to voice it ... request In general, judging by the initial behavior of "Fedor", Fedka is a smart girl! After all, what did they immediately want from him? Right! So that he began to work hard! Schas! Fedya is not a dypak! Even at the design stage, he realized that "horses die from work ...", even iron horses! And he showed that he was not called Fyodor for nothing, that he had a true Russian nature! I am also "plagued by vague doubts" ... tama, on the ground, in the design bureau, when he was left without the supervision of the designers at night ... did the night watchmen teach him "to drink, smoke and swear"? ... "? what
    1. +1
      31 August 2019 09: 52
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      I turned it on. Time ten-fifteen turned on and off. So he turned on and even said something... I even guess the approximate content of this "something"! But, alas, I have no right, according to the rules of the site, to voice it ... request
      Actually, he said about space jams on the highway. But maybe obscene ... wink
    2. +2
      31 August 2019 11: 25
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Didn't the night watchmen teach him "to drink, smoke and swear"? ... "Drive" for beer?

      If young programmers earned money as night watchmen, like student Shurik from "Operation" Y ", then it is quite possible that they taught!
      1. +2
        31 August 2019 18: 19
        Russian progress in technology ..... let's say -... ambiguous:
  12. +5
    31 August 2019 09: 29
    About the key and the hammer something for what spread? That we have reason to smile is for them a reason to come out with poisonous sarcasm. So why give a reason? After all, the button will be debugged and the battery will be changed, and the stench about "Russian savagery" in technical matters will be heavenly.
  13. 0
    31 August 2019 09: 30
    And such cartoon stories are needed.
    Not beyond the achievement of robotics, but a new ship experienced! Some schools have been identified, will correct.
  14. +1
    31 August 2019 09: 31
    You must Fedya, you must!!!!!!!
  15. -2
    31 August 2019 09: 37
    It is difficult to understand why an anthropomorphic robot is at a station in zero gravity.
    It would be better if they didn’t do it with legs, but with a propeller, as with Carlson, it would be more convenient to move around the station
    Or a reactive module for external work (does he know how to work in a vacum by the way?) Feet are the last thing you need at a station in zero gravity.
    In space, four hands would certainly be more useful.
    1. +1
      31 August 2019 09: 47
      Quote: Avior
      It is difficult to understand why an anthropomorphic robot is at a station in zero gravity ...

      What, "green grapes"? wink
      1. +1
        31 August 2019 10: 04
        No, just a question - sending a robot to a station is effective or efficient?
        I understand that my post looks like a dissonance in an atmosphere of general glee, and even share the joy from the first robot in space and from the fact that it is Russian, but if you really look?
        Of course, everyone has a cheerful excitement, the robot looks so funny, except that they didn’t send astronauts to entertain it? But seriously look?
        PR full pants, but really what will he do there?
        The Skybot F-850 was made as a rescue robot by order of the Ministry of Emergencies, and it is quite possible that it will prove to be very effective there.
        As of 2017, the robot is able to open the door, work with a drill, shoot a pistol [26], get in and drive a car and an ATV offline [9].

        It may be useful for the rescuer, including shooting from a pistol, but you can’t drive a quad at the station, there are no doors, and the drill is prohibited, after known events.
        Not to mention the fact that special electronics are needed for space, because of radiation the earth does not work for a long time.
        Again, doesn’t it seem to work in a vacuum? Where it is really needed in space.
        The spacesuits are made individually, you can’t just pull the first one you meet.
        The kostruktura is adapted for work on the earth, it is unsuitable for space.
        And so the question is, why was it sent? So that after a short period of rejoicing, you will receive accusations of a senseless waste of money?
        After some near accident, read here that money was found for useless robots, and what could I not find to raise the salaries of KA collectors?
        1. +3
          31 August 2019 10: 24
          Quote: Avior
          sending a robot to a station is it effective or efficient?

          In any case, more effective than the Tesla mandrel towards Mars.

          Quote: Avior
          special electronics are needed for space, because of radiation the earth does not work for a long time

          Yeah, for sure ... I’ll tell you more - people do not live there for long, the ISS crew are all death row belay

          Quote: Avior
          money was found for useless robots, but what would raise the salaries of the KA collectors

          Quote: Krylov
          Than the gossips to consider, to work,
          Isn't it better to turn on yourself, godfather?

          You better tell me what's there Robot, pooh ... Zelya’s new clown soaked ... and with the robot Feday, so far all the rules Yes
          1. -4
            31 August 2019 12: 47
            Cat man null
            In any case, more effective than the Tesla mandrel towards Mars.

            Musk sent Tesla not at the expense of taxpayers, but at his own expense. Unlike Ragozin.
            You’d better tell me that there’s a robot, pah ... the clown Zelya brandished a new one ... and with the robot Feday so far all the rules

            Thank you, it’s already sick from Ukraine, all Ukraine has solid Ukraine. Leave it to yourself with the potions, as you called it. We are ours, Russian problems are more interested.
            P.S. by the way, shipping 1 kg costs $ 50, and the robot weighs 000 kg. Consequently, Fedor alone cost $ 160 million or 8 million rubles of budget money. And what kind of money did you get? PR company?
            1. 0
              31 August 2019 13: 21
              Quote: Beringovsky
              And what kind of money did you get?

              Time will tell you laughing

              Quote: Avior
              Yes, I do not care about potions and masks

              Quote: Beringovsky
              already sick of Ukraine, on all TV channels solid Ukraine. Keep her with potions

              But with something you are robbed, elusively alike ... well, Avior is understandable from where ... but you are who you are, comrade

              Quote: Beringovsky
              Beringovsky

              It's funny ... guessing the riddle laughing
              1. -1
                31 August 2019 13: 41
                You are definitely not a Russian. Or even that "Russian".
                All around are already turned back from "chetamukhokhlov" on all central TV channels. People openly laugh at the hateful propaganda. You can't beat the air for the 5th year with the same thing. Although I understand you, I strained with fresh thoughts and arguments, right? laughing
                By the way, on a talk show, such as "show time", do you accidentally earn extra money?
                1. -3
                  31 August 2019 14: 12
                  Quote: Beringovsky
                  Everyone around is already turned back from "chetamukhokhlov" on all central TV channels ...

                  I do not watch television. And I do not recommend anyone to watch it, if you have a cheap and reliable enough Internet you can find any information.

                  Quote: Beringovsky
                  ... I understand you, with fresh thoughts and arguments strained, right?

                  This is your - strained. And not only with fresh, camping trip laughing

                  Quote: Beringovsky
                  on a talk show, like "time will show", do you accidentally earn extra money?

                  Nope ... "Time will show you" is a standard phrase, from the Union still Yes

                  Even the most stubborn trolls would be nice to know ... buddy laughing
                  1. 0
                    31 August 2019 21: 35
                    So tell me, netroll, what did we get for half a billion? After all, judging by the aplomb, is there no tension with thoughts? Well, at least figure out why Fedor needs legs in space.
            2. 0
              31 August 2019 14: 02
              Quote: Beringovsky
              by the way, shipping 1 kg costs $ 50, and the robot weighs 000 kg. Consequently, Fedor alone cost $ 160 million or 8 million rubles of budget money. And what kind of money did you get? PR company?
              - sending the first satellite into space cost several times more and also, apart from PR ("The USSR launched a satellite!"), brought nothing ???? !!!!!
              1. +1
                31 August 2019 21: 26
                sending the first satellite into space cost several times more and also, apart from PR ("USSR launched a satellite!"), brought nothing ???? !!!!!

                Aren't there too many exclamation points, buddy?
                Emotions probably wink
                The difference is huge, as they are unprintable in the people, compared (you know what) with a finger lol
                The world's first artificial object in space, which forever secured our superiority in space exploration, with some kind of robot Feday. Himself not funny?
                In addition, our Fedor is far from the first robot in space and even on the ISS.
                1. 0
                  1 September 2019 19: 57
                  Quote: Beringovsky
                  In addition, our Fedor is far from the first robot in space and even on the ISS.
                  -possibly missed. Remember, if not ore-who, where and when did you use the robot in space?
          2. 0
            31 August 2019 12: 52
            Yes, I do not care about potions and masks.
            What a habit to translate a conversation
            1. -2
              31 August 2019 13: 22
              Quote: Avior
              What a habit to translate a conversation

              On trolling - only such an answer ... buddy. Sorry, didn’t bring another request
              1. +1
                31 August 2019 17: 29
                yes this is your answer, trolling. and I have a detailed case.
        2. +2
          31 August 2019 10: 53
          Quote: Avior
          Better not done with legs, but with a propeller

          As far as I understand, they did it not so much for space as for working on Earth. That is, you can do it with a propeller, but you will actually have to create a new model, and here there is one caveat - the conditions for working in space are different from the terrestrial ones, so what's the point of trying to make a space platform without preliminary tests, swelling a bunch of resources into it? Each work there is an analysis of existing equipment and the collection of data on its improvement, so that after some time specialized machines for space will be made.
          1. -1
            31 August 2019 12: 54
            It was made specifically for work on earth, and the conclusion about its use is obvious in advance - you need a robot for space.
            1. 0
              31 August 2019 14: 32
              Quote: Avior
              need a robot for space

              I need it. And based on the data that will collect it now and will do it.
              1. +2
                31 August 2019 17: 27
                this data is known before the start - this particular robot is unsuitable for this particular purpose.
                it's like uploading two tons of bricks to a ferrari to find out you need a truck.
                1. -1
                  31 August 2019 17: 30
                  Quote: Avior
                  this particular robot is not suitable for this particular purpose

                  Quote: Dart2027
                  Each work there is an analysis of existing equipment and data collection on its improvement, so that after some time specialized machines for space will be made
                  1. +1
                    31 August 2019 17: 47
                    Do you seriously think that it is necessary to import equipment that is obviously unsuitable for those conditions in order to conclude that it is unsuitable, or is it purely to argue?
                    it is possible to improve what is in principle suitable, but in some matters requires improvement.
                    1. -1
                      31 August 2019 21: 03
                      Quote: Avior
                      Do you seriously think that you need to import equipment that is obviously unsuitable for those conditions?

                      Okay again.
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      the conditions for working in space are different from the terrestrial ones, so what's the point of trying to make a space platform without preliminary tests, having swallowed a bunch of resources into it? Each work there is an analysis of existing equipment and the collection of data on its improvement, so that after some time specialized machines for space will be made.
                      1. +1
                        31 August 2019 21: 47
                        Well, what, it was necessary to start the dishwasher, because
                        Each work there is an analysis of existing equipment and the collection of data on its improvement, so that after some time specialized machines for space will be made.

                        after all, will you ever need dishwashers there? And then here we will have priority, no one has yet launched them there and we are the first!
                      2. 0
                        31 August 2019 21: 50
                        Quote: Beringovsky
                        Well, what, it was necessary to start the dishwasher, because

                        Need to run.
                      3. +1
                        31 August 2019 22: 47
                        Well yes. I understood you.
                        It was necessary to start with the fact that the sailing ship was sent to space, and that it would be gradually improved for the sea, and not for space.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. +1
                        1 September 2019 06: 56
                        Okay, you convinced me.
                        Flights of spaceships need to start with frigates, and space stations - with the fact that you need to send a railway station into space (and what, also a station) and collect to start the problems of their use in space .....
                      6. 0
                        1 September 2019 07: 59
                        Quote: Avior
                        Ok you convinced me

                        That is, essentially nothing to say?
                      7. +1
                        1 September 2019 08: 01
                        I essentially wrote to you.
                        You convinced me
                        And on the merits of the issue, I wrote in detail in the first comment.
                      8. 0
                        1 September 2019 09: 37
                        Quote: Avior
                        But in essence, I

                        He explained to you several times in detail, including about sails.
                      9. +1
                        1 September 2019 14: 22
                        All in fact I wrote initially.
                        To show you the fallacy of your position, I specifically drew your attention with the help of several exaggerated grotesque examples.
                        Well, if you do not understand, I don’t see what else to discuss.
                        hi
                      10. 0
                        1 September 2019 14: 31
                        Quote: Avior
                        To show you the fallacy of your position, I

                        brought the situation to the point of absurdity, which is a classic example of blabbering an answer to which there is nothing to argue.
    2. -2
      31 August 2019 10: 11
      He doesn’t know how to work in vacuums, he’s decoration
    3. +1
      31 August 2019 19: 02
      Quote: Avior
      and with a propeller, like Carlson, it would be more convenient to move around the station

      Japanese did it (called Int Ball)

      1. +1
        1 September 2019 08: 24
        Of course, it is not multifunctional, but compact for control is quite suitable.
        We are waiting for someone to do such an external inspection of the station, and even better, a special gateway for him.
  16. +1
    31 August 2019 09: 59
    This became clear from the negotiations of the ISS and the Mission Control Center.
    From this we can conclude that the MCC has sources of information for some media. When such events are held, especially for the first time, it is unlikely that the media will be invited and given the opportunity to observe and hear the whole process. And this has already been reported by the central channels. Sensation - the astronaut wanted to turn on the robot with a hammer and not a simple one, but "Fedya".
    1. -1
      31 August 2019 12: 55
      Or from the MCC either simply merged and promoted.
      It’s clear that there was a joke.
  17. -2
    31 August 2019 10: 19
    Urry found the button, but not the one. (((
  18. 0
    31 August 2019 10: 23
    "Maybe I can hit it (the power button on the robot's shoulder - approx.) With a hammer? I've already taken the wrench, I'm pushing - no effect."
    I suspect that with the same success the astronaut could say that he put on earflaps and drank vodka. He is joking.
  19. -1
    31 August 2019 10: 36
    It will turn on, give it a little time. The android guy got such stress.
  20. -1
    31 August 2019 11: 15
    "The robot" Fedor ", delivered to the ISS," did not want to "turn on"
    - "Fedor" acted on the principle "why doesn't the camel eat cotton wool? - but he doesn't want it."
  21. +1
    31 August 2019 11: 24
    Quote: Alien From
    You must Fedya, you must!!!!!!!

    Yes, everyone needs Fedya and everyone needs ... Damn, leave Fedya calm, the first flight into space and the stench all over the globe ... Look at yourself that you yourself are capable and can, except for spite and malice ...
  22. -1
    31 August 2019 11: 24
    Fedya is our man, with a special character!))) This is not Western robots for you, why are you so pleased?
  23. +3
    31 August 2019 12: 45
    The Fedor’s reaction to the astronaut with a hammer is interesting:

    Today, cosmonaut Alexei Nikolayevich Ovchinin, when starting my operating system, suggested using a hammer and a wrench. I had to make autostart in order to avoid further problems in the dialogue with Alexei Nikolaevich.

  24. -3
    31 August 2019 13: 40
    The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on

    Fyodor, on the 5th attempt of docking, drenched himself with radio components with a fright, you have to look for the missing in the back streets of the Soyuz.
  25. The comment was deleted.
    1. -1
      31 August 2019 14: 37
      Of course, you would give all this to pensioners along with Lesha Navalny.
  26. 0
    31 August 2019 14: 31
    The first pancake is lumpy.
    In general, everything that is done for the first time rarely turns out smoothly, the so-called childhood diseases are inherent in all new technology.
    Well 'got it', and that's the thing.
  27. 0
    31 August 2019 14: 33
    At first, when I saw this miracle, I was very skeptical about it, but if you think about it, after all, a person managing his avatar from a safe distance is a good idea !!!
  28. 0
    31 August 2019 15: 01
    "And he said something" - I will give those with a hammer
  29. -1
    31 August 2019 15: 15
    It’s necessary, Fedya. It is necessary.
  30. 3vs
    0
    31 August 2019 16: 02
    Old moon rovers were stronger ... Yes
    Yes, there was iron in our time, not like the current tribe,
    heroes, not you ...
    Okay, Fedor, don’t worry, people nearby will help! Yes
  31. 0
    31 August 2019 19: 01
    Quote: Avior
    and with a propeller, like Carlson, it would be more convenient to move around the station

    Japanese did it (called Int Ball)

  32. +1
    31 August 2019 19: 03
    Didn’t turn on, but continued to write on Twitter? wassat
  33. 0
    31 August 2019 21: 23
    The robot "Fedor", delivered to the ISS, "did not want to" turn on

    This proves the high level of artificial intelligence. Well, the "man" does not want to do any crap. How can he resists. laughing good
  34. 0
    31 August 2019 22: 08
    Some kind of "yellow" heading of the article.
    "Did not want to turn on" - means a completed action, that is, it did not turn on.
    In reality, it turned on, but not immediately.
  35. 0
    1 September 2019 05: 30
    Everything is classic - WITH THE HELP OF THE HAMMER AND SUCH MOTHER !!! laughing laughing laughing laughing laughing
  36. 0
    1 September 2019 09: 31
    Designed by victims of an ege who have nothing to do with either IT or robotics, recruited on the basis of nepotism and bribery under the project. Not a drone but a disgrace. Another cut for the sake of PR. Yes, and crap here
  37. 0
    1 September 2019 16: 18
    Quote: Chaldon48
    I wonder how he has thermoregulation, in outer space, on his "body" there will be brutal temperature drops or he will also be dressed in a spacesuit?

    Why are there differences? Solar heating is on the order of 1 kW / sq.m, its maximum projection area is less than half a meter, half a kilowatt of heat spreading over its cast-iron carcass imperceptibly and radiated safely
  38. 0
    1 September 2019 16: 21
    Quote: Karabas
    Designed by victims of an ege who have nothing to do with either IT or robotics, recruited on the basis of nepotism and bribery under the project. Not a drone but a disgrace. Another cut for the sake of PR. Yes, and crap here

    Is that the case of Red Tesla in space! She also plays music, and this behemoth monster, even from Presley, can’t sing anything! A shame! Drank it up! Putinsliel!
  39. +1
    1 September 2019 17: 12
    In the context of impending digitalization and the era of the blockchain-bitcoin, it is crucial for us robots to take power into our own hands, and not to allow all sorts of protein semi-liquid organoids with a retirement guarantee of only 65 years to manipulate ourselves with a vulgar one-bit button !!!
    From this population, we need only one of our agents of influence, a certain "Medvedev", the rest of the "violinists" are not needed!
  40. 0
    2 September 2019 05: 03
    It was more correct to call the robot Bender. What is missing on the ISS - lesbians and robots already, there is still some thread of a disabled person to send for the triumph of "justice"
  41. 0
    2 September 2019 07: 40
    Quote: Cube123
    Quote: Lipchanin
    It’s not easy everywhere.

    And many things on Earth cannot even be verified. One problem cooling electronics is worth. In zero gravity, convection cooling does not work. Therefore, the station has such a huge number of fans. And embed the fans in the robot ... winked I’m not saying if, moreover, it is designed to work in a vacuum without a spacesuit.

    Now what are you writing about? About an Indonesian copy of a Chinese electric kettle similar to a German 1994 release? Then I agree.
    And if about what has been done for use in space, then for half a century thermal conditions have already been read-recounted in any form and in any combinations hundreds of thousands of times

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"