Military Review

Shugaev: the United States went beyond the bounds of decency in pressure on Russia's partners in the military-technical cooperation

51
The United States has already gone beyond the legal framework in exerting pressure on Russia's partners in the field of military-technical cooperation. This was stated by the head of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation of Russia (FSVTS) Dmitry Shugaev.


Shugaev: the United States went beyond the bounds of decency in pressure on Russia's partners in the military-technical cooperation


Responding to a question from journalists, the head of the FSMTC noted that US pressure on Russian partners in the military-technical cooperation is growing rapidly and has reached unprecedented proportions. At the same time, American representatives have long since cast aside all limits of decency, they simply directly threaten the imposition of sanctions against those countries that intend to acquire Russian military equipment.

Every day we receive information that embassy officials, military missions, representatives of the State Department come and just say: guys, you know, we have sanctions, now you’ll get right away. This is unprecedented, it has never happened before. Even in the worst of times, this has never happened. Some elementary decency existed. Now all this has gone beyond some legal relationship

- explained Shugaev.

He emphasized that the United States uses unfair competition methods and Russia knows all the facts of regular pressure on foreign countries by the United States. In some cases, this works, and in some, as with Turkey, this number does not work with the Americans, he noted.

According to Shugaev, US sanctions create certain problems, but Russia has already learned to circumvent them by applying various solutions to the current situation, such as refusing the dollar in transactions and switching to settlement in national currencies.

We are not going to engage in charity work with respect to Americans, nor will we substitute partners. We have various arrangements.

- said Shugaev, adding that in settlements between the CSTO countries, the Russian ruble is used as the currency in the calculations.
Photos used:
https://ru.depositphotos.com/
51 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Honest Citizen
    Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 16: 15
    -18
    The FSVTC head noted that US pressure on Russian partners in the military-technical cooperation sector is growing rapidly and has reached unprecedented proportions. At the same time, American representatives have long since cast aside all limits of decency, they simply directly threaten the imposition of sanctions against those countries that intend to acquire Russian military equipment.

    Consider a lost gesheft?
    Well, no one forbade them to produce better military equipment.
    And if we have already "done it", then marketing will not help either.
    1. totoro21
      totoro21 28 August 2019 16: 35
      +3
      And what does quality have to do with it? Or do you think that the United States will not hinder the sale of "quality" equipment?
      1. Honest Citizen
        Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 16: 46
        +1
        How to tell you ...
        Here is just an example of how a math problem.
        You are offered to buy a "promoted" brand, say, for 100 units of money. And they offer better quality for 60. Which one will you buy?
        So it is here. Here the USA has "untwisted" its "Apaches", "Patriots" - and fight for the brand money. But in fact, Ka-52 and S-400 are cooler. And they are cheaper.
        Let's argue further?
        1. totoro21
          totoro21 28 August 2019 17: 28
          +1
          We will be. The article is not about US brands being cooler. Or quality. And the fact that the Turks want to buy the S-400, and the United States is beginning to bother them: they say you buy, and then we will not sell the F-35 (in which the Turks have already invested a lot of dough, actually).
          What does the brand, promotion and quality have to do with it?
          1. Honest Citizen
            Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 18: 03
            -2
            the Turks want to buy the S-400, and the United States starts to bother them: they say you buy, and then we will not sell the F-35 to you (in which the Turks have already invested a bunch of dough, actually)

            those. Do you think the Turks are so stupid that they began to buy the S-400, knowing or assuming US sanctions on the F-35 deal?
            you put on your underpants or take off your cross (s)
            1. totoro21
              totoro21 28 August 2019 18: 43
              0
              And in your opinion, are the Turks so stupid that they did not suspect the alleged sanctions, despite the fact that the United States shouted about them at every corner? Oh well.
              1. Honest Citizen
                Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 18: 49
                -3
                In my opinion, the Turks decided that it was more profitable - either the air defense system, "when the fly won't fly," or the incomprehensible F-35 with fine-tuning, don't understand when.
                Ilya, you will disappoint me.
                1. totoro21
                  totoro21 28 August 2019 21: 59
                  0
                  Turks have decided? Like this? You yourself in the previous message claimed that the Turks did not suspect any sanctions from the United States when buying the S-400. And before that, you argued that sanctions have something to do with the quality of our weapons, which must be improved. And now it turns out they quite consciously abandoned the F-35, because the S-400 is better .... It is very difficult to understand what you want to say. Regarding the fact that I am disappointing you - what can I do?
                  1. Honest Citizen
                    Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 22: 45
                    -2
                    Turks have decided? Like this? You yourself in the previous message claimed that the Turks did not suspect any sanctions from the United States when buying the S-400. And before that, you argued that sanctions have something to do with the quality of our weapons, which must be improved.

                    Mixed in a bunch, horses, people (s)
                    So. I repeat for those who read diagonally.
                    The Turks very clearly determined for themselves that the S-400 is more important to them than the unfinished F-35.
                    The quality of the weapon that needs to be improved - this phrase is related to US products. If you misunderstood, these are your problems. Read the whole post. If something is not clear - ask.
                    PS One could also throw in geopolitics here, but I'm afraid that this will simply "overload" you ... so I will simply keep silent about the Turkish Stream ...
                    1. totoro21
                      totoro21 29 August 2019 09: 26
                      0
                      Really mixed up. But who was stopping them?

                      Quote: Honest Citizen
                      The Turks very clearly determined for themselves that the S-400 is more important to them than the F-35, which is not ready to the end

                      Let it be so.
                      But why did they even have to choose between the F-35 and S-400, if in your opinion they did not even suspect that the USA would refuse to supply the fighter to them?
                      Quote: Honest Citizen
                      Do you think the Turks are so stupid that they began to buy the S-400, knowing or assuming US sanctions on the F-35 deal?
                      I didn’t write it, right?
                      Further, yes, I really calculated that the text on improving the quality refers to our weapons and not to the United States. Not realized. But are these my problems?

                      Quote: Honest Citizen
                      Well, I am ALWAYS "misunderstood" ...
                      these are also your words, not mine. So, if people ALWAYS misunderstand you, then probably the problem is in you, and not in people?
                      Let's go further: the article was actually about the US sanctions. In your comments, I did not see the word "sanctions" at all. You talk about brands, quality, prices, whatever. Except for sanctions. I don't know how for others, but it's hard for me to understand (although 16 minuses suggest that it is difficult for others)
                      Here is your "math problem"
                      Quote: Honest Citizen
                      You are offered to buy a "promoted" brand, say, for 100 units of money. And they offer better quality for 60. Which one will you buy?

                      Everything seems to be true, but in fact it is not absolutely true. The correct formulation of the problem would be: "You are offered to buy a" promoted "brand, say, for 100 units of money. And they offer a better quality for 60, but if you buy a better one for 60, then you will be penalized for another 60 conventional units. at 160. " And which brand will you buy? The article is precisely about the fact that the United States is playing dishonestly, using tools of pressure, and not about the fact that their quality is worse but the brand is better. By the way, their quality is quite high, the price tag goes off scale, yes.
                      Quote: Honest Citizen
                      It would be possible to splash geopolitics here as well, but I'm afraid that this will simply "overload" you.

                      Don't be afraid. As the hero of L. Kuravleva said in the famous film: "Bolder, I'm near!"
        2. maden.usmanow
          maden.usmanow 28 August 2019 17: 36
          -6
          Ka 52 cooler than Apache?

          Oh well.
          1. Honest Citizen
            Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 17: 48
            0
            Do you have any doubts?
      2. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 28 August 2019 18: 42
        0
        Quote: totoro21
        And what does quality have to do with it? Or do you think that the United States will not hinder the sale of "quality" equipment?

        Why not? Will be. But if the SU-57 is in all respects better than the F-35, then no mattress pressure will help.
        1. totoro21
          totoro21 28 August 2019 22: 02
          +1
          All of the above is true, but this does not justify American sanctions. Why does not conditional Turkey buy American weapons does not receive sanctions from the Russian Federation or China? And buying Russian, gets sanctions from the United States? In the end, it is Turkey’s private affair what to buy and from whom, right?
    2. Svarog
      Svarog 28 August 2019 16: 49
      +1
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      Well, no one forbade them to produce better military equipment.

      If our equipment would not be of high quality, the United States would not be so excited .. They do not interfere with the Chinese in this regard ..
      1. Honest Citizen
        Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 18: 01
        +1
        Vladimir, so this point needs to be clarified totoro21 (Ilya)
        And then everything was brightened up on my first post, but my head was no longer thinking ...
        1. Svarog
          Svarog 28 August 2019 18: 12
          0
          Quote: Honest Citizen
          Vladimir, so this moment should be clarified totoro21 (Ilya)
          And then everything was brightened up on my first post, but my head was no longer thinking ..

          Sergey, perhaps you did not understand correctly .. hi
          1. Honest Citizen
            Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 18: 13
            -2
            Well, they always "misunderstand" me ...
            Classical Soviet education, now, alas, a rarity ...
            So I try not to pay attention to the graduates of the Unified State Exam, but sometimes, nevertheless, their "impenetrability" hurts.
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 28 August 2019 18: 15
              0
              Quote: Honest Citizen
              Well, they always "misunderstand" me ...
              Classical Soviet education, now, alas, a rarity ...
              So I try not to pay attention to the graduates of the Unified State Exam, but sometimes, nevertheless, their "impenetrability" hurts.

              You know, sometimes it also happens to me, I’ll write, implying one thing, and then it turns out that you can understand in two ways .. and the people here are harsh, they immediately throw minuses laughing drinks
        2. Ehanatone
          Ehanatone 28 August 2019 18: 46
          +1
          "And then everyone snapped at my first post, and no-no ..."
          And not a damn thing was clear, so I slammed a minus, call me ..!. lol
          1. Honest Citizen
            Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 18: 49
            -4
            You are forgivable, you have passed the exam for 100 points ...
            1. Ehanatone
              Ehanatone 28 August 2019 19: 28
              +1
              "You are forgiven, you passed the exam for 100 points ..."
              Thank you, but I didn’t reach 40 years ago ...! ... laughing
              1. Honest Citizen
                Honest Citizen 28 August 2019 19: 32
                -3
                So WHAT specifically didn’t you understand?
                And not a damn thing was clear

                A quote is given, a comment is left ...
                But there, above all minus ... also, apparently, "not clear" ...
                Moreover, you answered that you did not reach 40 years before the Unified State Examination? Read how to forget :?
                It's a shame for the country, for the people ...
  2. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 28 August 2019 16: 17
    +4
    State Department representatives come and just say: guys, you know, we have sanctions after all, now you’ll get right away. This is unprecedented, it has never happened before. Even in the worst of times, this has never happened.
    What decency can you expect from the Anglo-Saxons, just hamie.
    1. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 28 August 2019 16: 54
      +3
      Quote: tihonmarine
      State Department representatives come and just say: guys, you know, we have sanctions after all, now you’ll get right away. This is unprecedented, it has never happened before. Even in the worst of times, this has never happened.
      What decency can you expect from the Anglo-Saxons, just hamie.

      Yes Yes! And why would these descendants of the Dirty Harry gangster behave differently than in some provincial saloon of some Dakotovka? This is their style, their heredity and nature! negative
    2. major147
      major147 28 August 2019 18: 10
      +3
      Quote: tihonmarine
      What decency can you expect from the Anglo-Saxons, just hamie.

      Recently, in my opinion, a more accurate definition for them was voiced - "political gopniks".
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 28 August 2019 19: 23
        +1
        Quote: major147
        "political gopniks".

        Very accurate. You can’t name it better.
  3. tatarin_ru
    tatarin_ru 28 August 2019 16: 19
    +3
    The United States has already gone beyond the legal framework

    Yes, a long time ago, now they just stopped hiding it.
    1. mat-vey
      mat-vey 28 August 2019 16: 42
      +3
      Throughout the history of mankind there is one "legal framework" - the right of the strong. That's in this "legal field" they operate.
  4. Amateur
    Amateur 28 August 2019 16: 50
    0
    The one who has more rights

    Popular wisdom.
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 28 August 2019 16: 59
      +1
      Amateur hi -That is right, who has more clubs, the truth of life. ...
  5. V1er
    V1er 28 August 2019 16: 59
    +1
    I think this is just the beginning. Now they will start scribbling sanctions for flows, gas, oil, steel, resources. And absolutely against everyone. They will start with satellites in Europe and end with China and Turkey. They want to apply the Iranian strategy to us.
    1. totoro21
      totoro21 28 August 2019 17: 41
      +1
      We are not Iran. And especially not Iran, China, Turkey and Europe. In an economic war against the whole world, the United States may well lose.
      1. V1er
        V1er 28 August 2019 17: 49
        +1
        The whole world is built on the dollar. The US can only lose when the dollar system collapses.
        1. totoro21
          totoro21 28 August 2019 17: 55
          0
          Well? And why shouldn't she collapse?
          1. V1er
            V1er 28 August 2019 18: 00
            +1
            For 70 years, as we wait)
            1. totoro21
              totoro21 28 August 2019 18: 39
              0
              Well, the United States never in 70 years tried to fight the whole world at once.
            2. Ehanatone
              Ehanatone 28 August 2019 18: 52
              0
              "We've been waiting for 70 years"
              In the 80s there was such a moment, but the Judas labeled them saved ...
          2. Kronos
            Kronos 28 August 2019 18: 09
            0
            Because all the dollar he uses the world currency and are not going to refuse it yet
      2. Kronos
        Kronos 28 August 2019 18: 09
        0
        So the United States does not fight economically against the whole world; they have a powerful block of Setelites
        1. totoro21
          totoro21 28 August 2019 18: 40
          0
          Not a question for me. The idea that the United States will fight with all, said Comrade. V1er
  6. yehat
    yehat 28 August 2019 17: 01
    +2
    Quote: Svarog
    Quote: Honest Citizen
    Well, no one forbade them to produce better military equipment.

    If our equipment would not be of high quality, the United States would not be so excited .. They do not interfere with the Chinese in this regard ..

    interfere. but China is a very large trading partner and the United States really does not want to quarrel too much with it.
    1. maden.usmanow
      maden.usmanow 28 August 2019 17: 39
      0
      but China is a very large trading partner and the United States really does not want to quarrel too much with it.


      Too serious is war?
      Because everything else is already happening.
      1. yehat
        yehat 28 August 2019 17: 45
        0
        Quote: maden.usmanow
        Because everything else is already happening.

        these are Trump's clumsy methods - he is not delicate and straightforward.
        previously in the US were more dodgy in foreign policy.
  7. Rostislav Bely
    Rostislav Bely 28 August 2019 17: 08
    0
    The result is that it will fight weapons in third countries and will show its effectiveness (accounting) - as I understand it, the whole body of the state movement speaks about it (weapons) mostly fake in the hope that they will not contact US buyers (Hope in Lenin’s family dies last - Iran generally shot down their super-booper drone and they washed or wiped themselves) ...
  8. NF68
    NF68 28 August 2019 17: 13
    +1
    It seems that the United States is not going to stop there either. They have something to lose.
  9. rocket757
    rocket757 28 August 2019 17: 14
    +2
    Stripes, some decency ????? What are you talking about?
  10. Kontrik
    Kontrik 28 August 2019 17: 33
    +1
    State Department representatives come and just say: guys, you know, we have sanctions

    Well, what is the demand from them .. Naglosaksa in one word!
    By the way, sanctions against Russia began to be introduced in the 16th century, and about a hundred Dutchmen were arrested, who gathered in Russia at the invitation of work. hi
    So we don’t get used to it
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Alexander Ra
    Alexander Ra 28 August 2019 18: 30
    +1
    This is a feeling of a barrier in communications, a sign of our inadequacy in assessing the actions of the “partner”. It is necessary to radically revise the look at this "partner" - a hostile attitude towards us - to treat ourselves as the enemy, to throw games in decency, in a dead defense. Once upon a time, the mobilization regime must be included. The situation is quite like before 2MB. The quality problem of our elite is growing.
  13. APASUS
    APASUS 28 August 2019 18: 33
    0
    Such a phrase as an American businessman may soon acquire a different meaning - it will become abusive!
  14. Chaldon48
    Chaldon48 29 August 2019 03: 04
    0
    The USA went beyond the bounds of decency, how could they go beyond this bounds if they had never been in them?