Military Review

Leon Trotsky - The Red Bonaparte of the World Revolution

35
In the 2017 year, Russia celebrated the 100 year anniversary of a grandiose historical event - a great shock that affected not only our country, but also many world powers. During the October Revolution, new heroes entered the political arena.




One of these heroes, who played one of the brightest roles in this event of world significance, was played by Leon Trotsky. The figure, to put it mildly, is ambiguous, as, incidentally, are all the revolutionaries of that era, and indeed of any era in general.

For his ambitiousness, ruthlessness, and the ability to find a way out of the most difficult troubles, he received the nickname "Red Bonaparte". For many years he paved his way to the political Olympus. The fate of millions of people and the world depended on him, but his "star" did not fully flare up.

Documentary prepared by the TV channel "History", In a completely new way will illuminate the key points of the biography of Leon Trotsky, relying on unique documentary materials, photographs, research by domestic and foreign scientists.

Whose interests did Trotsky represent? Who funded the Red Bonaparte? Thanks to whom Trotsky owes his exaltation? How did he pay these "bills"? Watch the video.


Photos used:
Depositphotos.com
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Phil77
    Phil77 27 August 2019 12: 15
    +6
    Dear author, Well, forgive me generously, but (ellipsis) Trotsky is not Napoleon! Far from Napoleon. Who is he? Trotsky. His merit is frankly not enough.
    1. Old Michael
      Old Michael 27 August 2019 19: 16
      0
      His merit is frankly not enough.

      But the followers and ideological heirs are still not extinct.
    2. naidas
      naidas 28 August 2019 21: 59
      +2
      Quote: Phil77
      Trotsky is not Napoleon!

      This is not the author of the article:
      Until 1925, Bolshevik propaganda regarded Leo Trotsky as "one of the leaders of the Red Army", and opponents as the "military leader" of Bolshevism.
      Researchers V. Krasnov and V. Daines in their work “Unknown Trotsky: Red Bonaparte”, Trotsky, as the head of the Red Army, managed to completely defeat all the internal armed resistance to the Communists, while the struggle against external enemies was not so successful.
      -initiated the widespread involvement of “military specialists”,
      -introduced such a managerial unit as the Revolutionary Military Councils of armies and fronts
      - the first text of the military oath
      -system of military commissariats
      - Resolution "On compulsory training in the art of war" for all workers.
      - Established a system of operational, forced mass mobilization of the population. This system also worked after it.
      -approved the red star as a badge
      -in 1919, individual insignia were introduced in the form of squares and rhombuses, a uniform uniform was introduced, and the restoration of traditional military greetings in the army.
      On the other hand:
      -provoked the Czechoslovak rebellion
      - devotion to executions, including executions of honored communists
      - non-negotiable, only Lenin was able to reconcile him with everyone, Lenin did not, Trotsky did not.
  2. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 27 August 2019 12: 24
    +7
    Whose interests did Trotsky represent? Who funded the Red Bonaparte? Thanks to whom Trotsky owes his exaltation?
    The US citizen's passport was handed to Lev Davidovich by President Woodrow Wilson himself. Here is the answer to all the questions.
    1. Phil77
      Phil77 27 August 2019 12: 29
      +10
      It goes without saying, but it’s not a sin at all to recall how much Russian blood this * devil of the revolution shed * - here I consider a more correct definition of this character of our history.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 27 August 2019 12: 36
        +2
        Quote: Phil77
        it’s not a sin to remember how much Russian blood this * devil of revolution * shed

        Such a measure has not yet been invented.
        1. Phil77
          Phil77 27 August 2019 12: 40
          +4
          Good day, dear Vlad! I perfectly understand that revolution, civil war, victims and cruelty on both sides. But this monster, by its bloodthirstiness, I think can not be compared with anyone! And call him Napoleon (even red)?
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 27 August 2019 12: 53
            +2
            Quote: Phil77
            And call him Napoleon (even red)?

            My tongue will not move to call him Napoleon, more likely the Chancellor of 3 Reich. (And another such demon was. Died 16 March 1919 year).
            1. Phil77
              Phil77 27 August 2019 13: 35
              +4
              And, I remembered! Do you mean Vlad, Sverdlov? He has diamonds and very good. was the hard currency in the safe?
              1. tihonmarine
                tihonmarine 27 August 2019 14: 17
                +1
                Quote: Phil77
                And, I remembered! Do you mean Vlad, Sverdlov? He has diamonds and very good. was the hard currency in the safe?

                About him, when in March he was lying with lobar pneumonia, one person V.I. Lenin did not come to the hospital, and Sverdlov was the second person in the state. I hope we read the same thing.
                1. Phil77
                  Phil77 27 August 2019 14: 46
                  +2
                  You know, Vlad, it’s a shame that you (and I, to the best of your humble merit) devoted the best years of your life to the creation of a state, this vampire had a direct part. Alas! You won’t take away from him. At least with respect to the invincible and legendary.
                  1. aybolyt678
                    aybolyt678 27 August 2019 20: 34
                    +1
                    Quote: Phil77
                    Know this ghoul had a direct part. Alas! And this can not be taken away from him. At least in relation to the invincible and legendary.

                    Yes, he had an attitude. there was also a goal - to create an army of the world revolution! and also to create a Cominter and its institutions. As a result, first the army, then the world revolution, then .... "We are on the mountain all the bourgeoisie will fan the world fire, the world fire in blood, God bless" Blok.
                    One continent in the blood of another - a mono-state with a developed industry for the sale of weapons ... does not resemble anything? The Soviet Union is a project that began to live its own life, in contrast to the original goal.
      2. AU Ivanov.
        AU Ivanov. 27 August 2019 14: 15
        +1
        That's what Trotsky was called. Only not the devil, but the demon of revolution. The difference, in principle, is small.
        1. Phil77
          Phil77 27 August 2019 14: 21
          0
          Yes, yes. The devil is a little taller. But still this one, oh well, to put it mildly? Well, in short, history condemned him.
        2. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 27 August 2019 14: 27
          +2
          Demon - the collective name of supernatural beings or spirits, occupying a lower position compared to the gods, which can play both a positive and a negative role .. The Devil is a religious and mythological character: the supreme demon of evil; lord of hell; incitement of people to sin
          . As you can see, the difference is big. In this case, the Devil is more suitable than the Demon.
          1. Phil77
            Phil77 27 August 2019 14: 39
            0
            Vlad, excuse me, but they still called him the demon! That is, again, well, never Napoleon Bonaparte! He certainly is not the devil, but the Emperor of France and the commander !!!! And this? Bloodthirsty ghoul.
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 27 August 2019 14: 53
              +1
              Quote: Phil77
              called it a demon!

              Well, try at that time to call this ghoul "Devil", the one who said this would not have lived a minute. Now we can say "Hu from Hu".
              1. Phil77
                Phil77 27 August 2019 14: 56
                0
                Grays! Grays! Can a demon be? At that time?
            2. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 27 August 2019 14: 56
              +1
              And this brow of ambitions had a hoo, and of course he wanted to be called Napoleon. Although, as my grandfather said, his name was different.
              1. Phil77
                Phil77 27 August 2019 15: 04
                0
                Question! And what did your grandfather call him? Think-Lyovka?
                1. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 27 August 2019 15: 19
                  0
                  Quote: Phil77
                  Think-Lyovkoy?

                  little bloody ...
  3. Phil77
    Phil77 27 August 2019 12: 31
    +1
    Sorry! The word * generously * of course one * n *! Error!
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. Phil77
      Phil77 27 August 2019 12: 46
      +5
      These occupiers in the 30s were pretty much cleaned up by Comrade Stalin. Yes, and this * demon of revolution * was eliminated.
      1. Xnumx vis
        Xnumx vis 27 August 2019 12: 54
        +1
        Quote: Phil77
        These occupiers in the 30s were pretty much cleaned up by Comrade Stalin. Yes, and this * demon of revolution * was eliminated.

        Then Brezhnev continued to press them .. Restrictions (not vowels!) On admission to military schools, to some universities, permission to leave the USSR .. They cleaned as they could .. However .. do not expel them to their historical homeland, rest against .. Ukraine is all the top of God's chosen ..a la branch of Israel ..
        1. Phil77
          Phil77 27 August 2019 13: 09
          +1
          Slightly different weight categories, I meant exactly those who were in power. With regards to entering certain universities. Again, an example from my personal life: I had a classmate with such a mother * German * surname (well, let it be Friedland) named Alexey. So you won’t believe, from the first call he enters the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology! He enrolled and studied. And then he scattered, scattered throughout his life. But, the result! After a long absence in Moscow I meet him on the street, well, the tramp who has completely descended is never like ! whom I remembered at school. On questions muttered something it was illegible and went calling calling empty bottles in the string bag. Sorry, if not the topic!
        2. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 27 August 2019 15: 10
          0
          Quote: 30 vis
          In Ukraine, the whole elite of the God-chosen ..a la branch of Israel ..

          Read then the statements of Menachem M. Schneerson.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 27 August 2019 12: 54
        +3
        Somewhere I.V. not finalized.
  5. Amateur
    Amateur 27 August 2019 12: 57
    +1
    Leiba Davidovich Bronstein. Party pseudonyms: Leo Davidovich Trotsky, Feather, Antid Oto, L. Sedov, The Old Man.
    It is necessary to call everything by their proper names.
    1. Phil77
      Phil77 27 August 2019 13: 17
      +3
      Quote: Amateur
      Leiba Davidovich Bronstein. Party pseudonyms: Leo Davidovich Trotsky, Feather, Antid Oto, L. Sedov, The Old Man.
      It is necessary to call everything by their proper names.

      Yes, God bless them with * chases * - that! The fact is that in history he remained Trotsky, bloody Trotsky! And absolutely not Bonaparte !!!!
      1. Rostislav Bely
        Rostislav Bely 27 August 2019 16: 04
        0
        taking into account the fact that after Lenin's call to the party, "anti-Semitism" began in the party and Trotsky's days were numbered ...
        Stalin could be conditionally called "Bonaparte" with one caveat (he was not defeated and overthrown like Napoleon)
        1. Phil77
          Phil77 27 August 2019 16: 19
          +1
          Dear Rostislav, I note that IV Stalin was not defeated by anyone, nor overthrown. He remained in our memory precisely with Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (Dzhugashvili). And to compare it with the respected Napoleon Buonparte (Bonaparte) is not correct!
          1. mat-vey
            mat-vey 28 August 2019 15: 04
            0
            ". And to compare him with the respected Napoleon Buonparté (Bonaparte)" - and what is so respected in Bounaparte?
  6. Ehanatone
    Ehanatone 27 August 2019 16: 27
    +2
    The film honestly did not watch what else can be said about, to put it mildly, not very neat, inhuman, for whom Russia acted as a match, for a world fire ...
    An ice ax to help him ...
    Speaking of ice ax:
    it’s worth noting purely human courage and cleanliness or something, I don’t know what to call it more precisely ...
    - at the first attempt, he instantly climbed under the bed, not forgetting to take his wife with him ...
    what distinguishes it favorably from another symbol of Vlasov's liberoids, which, without hesitation, did not hesitate, when surrendering to the Germans, said to shoot the woman that was with him ...
    And how from such a guano maneuvers to sculpt a fighter against the regime, apparently they themselves are not far from this ...
  7. Phil77
    Phil77 27 August 2019 17: 05
    0
    I repeat: this vampire (ghoul) to Napoleon Bonaparte as to China in an interesting position (ladies, sorry, please!).
  8. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 28 August 2019 20: 38
    0
    One of these heroes, who played one of the brightest roles in this event of world significance, was played by Leon Trotsky. The figure, to put it mildly, is ambiguous, as, incidentally, are all the revolutionaries of that era, and indeed of any era in general.
    Not a hero, "but the last scoundrel", a terry Russophobe and a bloody maniac! angry
    I didn’t watch the film, but I curse it.